[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
www/philosophy/po fighting-software-patents.ta....
From: |
Ineiev |
Subject: |
www/philosophy/po fighting-software-patents.ta.... |
Date: |
Mon, 1 Feb 2021 05:37:39 -0500 (EST) |
CVSROOT: /web/www
Module name: www
Changes by: Ineiev <ineiev> 21/02/01 05:37:39
Modified files:
philosophy/po : fighting-software-patents.ta.po
Added files:
philosophy/po : fighting-software-patents.ta-en.html
Log message:
Reconstruct translated version.
CVSWeb URLs:
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/po/fighting-software-patents.ta.po?cvsroot=www&r1=1.3&r2=1.4
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/po/fighting-software-patents.ta-en.html?cvsroot=www&rev=1.1
Patches:
Index: fighting-software-patents.ta.po
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/po/fighting-software-patents.ta.po,v
retrieving revision 1.3
retrieving revision 1.4
diff -u -b -r1.3 -r1.4
--- fighting-software-patents.ta.po 23 Jun 2019 15:28:32 -0000 1.3
+++ fighting-software-patents.ta.po 1 Feb 2021 10:37:39 -0000 1.4
@@ -2,13 +2,14 @@
# Copyright (C) 2007 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
# This file is distributed under the same license as the original article.
# Sri Ramadoss M <amachu@yavarkkum.org>, 2007.
-# Feb. 2017: GNUNify.
+# Thérèse Godefroy <godef.th AT free.fr> Feb. 2017: GNUNify.
+# Ineiev, 2021: minor fixes.
#
msgid ""
msgstr ""
"Project-Id-Version: fighting-software-patents.html\n"
"POT-Creation-Date: 2014-03-14 04:33+0000\n"
-"PO-Revision-Date: \n"
+"PO-Revision-Date: 2021-02-01 17:17+0000\n"
"Last-Translator: Thérèse Godefroy <godef.th AT free.fr>\n"
"Language-Team: web-translators <web-translators@gnu.org>\n"
"Language: ta\n"
@@ -218,20 +219,15 @@
#. our web pages, see <a
#. href="/server/standards/README.translations.html">Translations
#. README</a>.
-#. type: Content of: <div><div><p>
-#, fuzzy
msgid ""
"Please see the <a href=\"/server/standards/README.translations.html"
"\">Translations README</a> for information on coordinating and submitting "
"translations of this article."
msgstr ""
-"à®à®¨à¯à®¤ à®à®à¯à®à¯à®°à¯à®¯à®¿à®©à¯
à®®à¯à®´à®¿à®ªà¯à®¯à®°à¯à®ªà¯à®ªà¯
à®à®°à¯à®à¯à®à®¿à®£à¯à®ªà¯à®ªà®¤à¯,
à®à®®à®°à¯à®ªà¯à®ªà®¿à®ªà¯à®ªà®¤à¯ தà¯à®à®°à¯à®ªà®¾à®©
விவரà®à¯à®à®³à¯à®à¯à®à¯ <a "
-"href=\"/server/standards/README.translations.html\">à®®à¯à®´à®¿à®ªà¯à®¯à®°à¯à®ªà¯à®ªà¯à®à®³à¯
README "
-"à®à¯à®ªà¯à®ªà¯à®à¯</a> à®à®¾à®£à®µà¯à®®à¯."
#. type: Content of: <div><p>
msgid "Copyright © 2004 Richard Stallman"
-msgstr "Copyright © 2004 Richard Stallman (ரிà®à¯à®à®°à¯à®à¯
ஸà¯à®à®¾à®²à¯à®®à¯à®©à¯)"
+msgstr "Copyright © 2004 Richard Stallman"
#. type: Content of: <div><p>
msgid ""
Index: fighting-software-patents.ta-en.html
===================================================================
RCS file: fighting-software-patents.ta-en.html
diff -N fighting-software-patents.ta-en.html
--- /dev/null 1 Jan 1970 00:00:00 -0000
+++ fighting-software-patents.ta-en.html 1 Feb 2021 10:37:39 -0000
1.1
@@ -0,0 +1,116 @@
+<!--#include virtual="/server/header.html" -->
+<!-- Parent-Version: 1.77 -->
+<title>Fighting Software Patents
+- Singly and Together - GNU Project - Free Software Foundation</title>
+<!--#include virtual="/philosophy/po/fighting-software-patents.translist" -->
+<!--#include virtual="/server/banner.html" -->
+<h2>Fighting Software Patents - Singly and Together</h2>
+
+<p>by Richard Stallman</p>
+
+<p>
+Software patents are the software project equivalent of land mines:
+each design decision carries a risk of stepping on a patent, which can
+destroy your project.</p>
+<p>
+Developing a large and complex program means combining many ideas,
+often hundreds or thousands of them. In a country that allows
+software patents, chances are that some substantial fraction of the
+ideas in your program will be patented already by various companies.
+Perhaps hundreds of patents will cover parts of your program. A study
+in 2004 found almost 300 US patents that covered various parts of a
+single important program. It is so much work to do such a study that
+only one has been done.</p>
+<p>
+Practically speaking, if you are a software developer, you will
+usually be threatened by one patent at a time. When this happens, you
+may be able to escape unscathed if you find legal grounds to overturn
+the patent. You may as well try it; if you succeed, that will mean one
+less mine in the mine field. If this patent is particularly
+threatening to the public, the <a href="http://www.pubpat.org">Public
+Patent Foundation (pubpat.org)</a> may take up the case; that is its
+specialty. If you ask for the computer-using community's help in
+searching for prior publication of the same idea, to use as evidence
+to overturn a patent, we should all respond with whatever useful
+information we might have.</p>
+<p>
+However, fighting patents one by one will never eliminate the danger
+of software patents, any more than swatting mosquitos will eliminate
+malaria. You cannot expect to defeat every patent that comes at you,
+any more than you can expect to kill every monster in a video game:
+sooner or later, one is going to defeat you and damage your program.
+The US patent office issues around a hundred thousand software patents
+each year; our best efforts could never clear these mines as fast as
+they plant more.</p>
+<p>
+Some of these mines are impossible to clear. Every software patent is
+harmful, and every software patent unjustly restricts how you use your
+computer, but not every software patent is legally invalid according
+to the patent system's criteria. The software patents we can overturn
+are those that result from “mistakes”, where the patent
+system's rules were not properly carried out. There is nothing we can
+do when the only relevant mistake was the policy of allowing software
+patents.</p>
+<p>
+To make a part of the castle safe, you've got to do more than kill the
+monsters as they appear—you have to wipe out the generator that
+produces them. Overturning existing patents one by one will not make
+programming safe. To do that, we have to change the patent system so
+that patents can no longer threaten software developers and users.</p>
+<p>
+There is no conflict between these two campaigns: we can work on the
+short-term escape and the long-term fix at once. If we take care, we
+can make our efforts to overturn individual software patents do double
+duty, building support for efforts to correct the whole problem. The
+crucial point is not to equate “bad” software patents with
+mistaken or invalid software patents. Each time we invalidate one
+software patent, each time we talk about our plans to try, we should
+say in no uncertain terms, “One less software patent, one less
+menace to programmers: the target is zero.”</p>
+<p>
+The battle over software patents in the European Union is reaching a
+crucial stage. The European Parliament voted a year ago to reject
+software patents conclusively. In May, the Council of Ministers voted
+to undo the Parliament's amendments and make the directive even worse
+than when it started. However, at least one country that supported
+this has already reversed its vote. We must all do our utmost right
+now to convince an additional European country to change its vote, and
+to convince the newly elected members of the European Parliament to
+stand behind the previous vote. Please refer
+to <a href="http://www.ffii.org/"> www.ffii.org</a> for more
+information on how to help, and to get in touch with other
+activists.</p>
+</div><!-- for id="content", starts in the include above -->
+<!--#include virtual="/server/footer.html" -->
+<div id="footer">
+<div class="unprintable">
+
+<p>Please send FSF & GNU inquiries to <a
+href="mailto:gnu@gnu.org"><gnu@gnu.org></a>. There are also <a
+href="/contact/">other ways to contact</a> the FSF.
+<br />
+Please send broken links and other corrections or suggestions to <a
+href="mailto:webmasters@gnu.org"><webmasters@gnu.org></a>.</p>
+
+<p>Please see the <a
+href="/server/standards/README.translations.html">Translations README</a> for
+information on coordinating and submitting translations of this article.</p>
+</div>
+
+<p>Copyright © 2004 Richard Stallman</p>
+
+<p>This page is licensed under a <a rel="license"
+href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/3.0/us/">Creative
+Commons Attribution-NoDerivs 3.0 United States License</a>.</p>
+
+<!--#include virtual="/server/bottom-notes.html" -->
+
+<p class="unprintable">Updated:
+<!-- timestamp start -->
+$Date: 2021/02/01 10:37:39 $
+<!-- timestamp end -->
+</p>
+</div>
+</div>
+</body>
+</html>
[Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread] |
- www/philosophy/po fighting-software-patents.ta....,
Ineiev <=