www-commits
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

www/licenses/po gpl-faq.es.po gpl-faq.fr.po gpl...


From: GNUN
Subject: www/licenses/po gpl-faq.es.po gpl-faq.fr.po gpl...
Date: Thu, 1 Aug 2019 05:00:42 -0400 (EDT)

CVSROOT:        /web/www
Module name:    www
Changes by:     GNUN <gnun>     19/08/01 05:00:42

Modified files:
        licenses/po    : gpl-faq.es.po gpl-faq.fr.po 
                         gpl-faq.it-diff.html gpl-faq.it.po 
                         gpl-faq.ja-diff.html gpl-faq.ja.po gpl-faq.pot 
                         gpl-faq.ru.po gpl-faq.ta.po gpl-faq.zh-cn.po 

Log message:
        Automatic update by GNUnited Nations.

CVSWeb URLs:
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/licenses/po/gpl-faq.es.po?cvsroot=www&r1=1.117&r2=1.118
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/licenses/po/gpl-faq.fr.po?cvsroot=www&r1=1.218&r2=1.219
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/licenses/po/gpl-faq.it-diff.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.8&r2=1.9
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/licenses/po/gpl-faq.it.po?cvsroot=www&r1=1.68&r2=1.69
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/licenses/po/gpl-faq.ja-diff.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.18&r2=1.19
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/licenses/po/gpl-faq.ja.po?cvsroot=www&r1=1.94&r2=1.95
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/licenses/po/gpl-faq.pot?cvsroot=www&r1=1.88&r2=1.89
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/licenses/po/gpl-faq.ru.po?cvsroot=www&r1=1.165&r2=1.166
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/licenses/po/gpl-faq.ta.po?cvsroot=www&r1=1.79&r2=1.80
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/licenses/po/gpl-faq.zh-cn.po?cvsroot=www&r1=1.7&r2=1.8

Patches:
Index: gpl-faq.es.po
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/licenses/po/gpl-faq.es.po,v
retrieving revision 1.117
retrieving revision 1.118
diff -u -b -r1.117 -r1.118
--- gpl-faq.es.po       13 Apr 2019 09:00:08 -0000      1.117
+++ gpl-faq.es.po       1 Aug 2019 09:00:41 -0000       1.118
@@ -8,7 +8,7 @@
 msgid ""
 msgstr ""
 "Project-Id-Version: gpl-faq.html\n"
-"POT-Creation-Date: 2019-04-12 15:26+0000\n"
+"POT-Creation-Date: 2019-08-01 08:55+0000\n"
 "PO-Revision-Date: 2019-04-13 10:32+0200\n"
 "Last-Translator: Javier Fdez. Retenaga <address@hidden>\n"
 "Language-Team: Spanish <address@hidden>\n"
@@ -16,6 +16,7 @@
 "MIME-Version: 1.0\n"
 "Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8\n"
 "Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit\n"
+"X-Outdated-Since: 2019-08-01 08:55+0000\n"
 "Plural-Forms: nplurals=2; plural=(n!=1);\n"
 "X-Generator: Poedit 1.8.11\n"
 
@@ -880,9 +881,29 @@
 "esa versión?</a>"
 
 #. type: Content of: <ul><li>
+# | <a href=\"#TradeSecretRelease\">What if a company distributes a copy {+of
+# | some other developers' GPL-covered work to me+} as a trade secret?</a>
+#, fuzzy
+#| msgid ""
+#| "<a href=\"#TradeSecretRelease\">What if a company distributes a copy as a "
+#| "trade secret?</a>"
 msgid ""
-"<a href=\"#TradeSecretRelease\">What if a company distributes a copy as a "
-"trade secret?</a>"
+"<a href=\"#TradeSecretRelease\">What if a company distributes a copy of some "
+"other developers' GPL-covered work to me as a trade secret?</a>"
+msgstr ""
+"<a href=\"#TradeSecretRelease\">¿Qué sucede si una empresa distribuye una "
+"copia como secreto comercial?</a>"
+
+#. type: Content of: <ul><li>
+# | <a href=\"#TradeSecretRelease{+2+}\">What if a company distributes a copy
+# | {+of its own GPL-covered work to me+} as a trade secret?</a>
+#, fuzzy
+#| msgid ""
+#| "<a href=\"#TradeSecretRelease\">What if a company distributes a copy as a "
+#| "trade secret?</a>"
+msgid ""
+"<a href=\"#TradeSecretRelease2\">What if a company distributes a copy of its "
+"own GPL-covered work to me as a trade secret?</a>"
 msgstr ""
 "<a href=\"#TradeSecretRelease\">¿Qué sucede si una empresa distribuye una "
 "copia como secreto comercial?</a>"
@@ -5138,22 +5159,43 @@
 "no ha publicado esa versión, no se ha producido tal vulneración."
 
 #. type: Content of: <dl><dt>
-msgid ""
-"What if a company distributes a copy as a trade secret? <span class=\"anchor-"
-"reference-id\">(<a href=\"#TradeSecretRelease\" >#TradeSecretRelease</a>)</"
-"span>"
+# | What if a company distributes a copy {+of some other developers'
+# | GPL-covered work to me+} as a trade secret? <span
+# | class=\"anchor-reference-id\">(<a href=\"#TradeSecretRelease\"
+# | >#TradeSecretRelease</a>)</span>
+#, fuzzy
+#| msgid ""
+#| "What if a company distributes a copy as a trade secret? <span class="
+#| "\"anchor-reference-id\">(<a href=\"#TradeSecretRelease\" "
+#| ">#TradeSecretRelease</a>)</span>"
+msgid ""
+"What if a company distributes a copy of some other developers' GPL-covered "
+"work to me as a trade secret? <span class=\"anchor-reference-id\">(<a href="
+"\"#TradeSecretRelease\" >#TradeSecretRelease</a>)</span>"
 msgstr ""
 "¿Qué sucede si una empresa distribuye una copia como secreto comercial? "
 "<span class=\"anchor-reference-id\">(<a href=\"#TradeSecretRelease\" "
 ">#TradeSecretRelease</a>)</span>"
 
 #. type: Content of: <dl><dd><p>
-msgid ""
-"If a company distributes a copy to you and claims it is a trade secret, the "
-"company has violated the GPL and will have to cease distribution.  Note how "
-"this differs from the theft case above; the company does not intentionally "
-"distribute a copy when a copy is stolen, so in that case the company has not "
-"violated the GPL."
+# | [-If a company distributes a copy to you and claims it is a trade secret,
+# | the-]{+The+} company has violated the GPL and will have to cease
+# | [-distribution.-] {+distribution of that program.+} Note how this differs
+# | from the theft case above; the company does not intentionally distribute a
+# | copy when a copy is stolen, so in that case the company has not violated
+# | the GPL.
+#, fuzzy
+#| msgid ""
+#| "If a company distributes a copy to you and claims it is a trade secret, "
+#| "the company has violated the GPL and will have to cease distribution.  "
+#| "Note how this differs from the theft case above; the company does not "
+#| "intentionally distribute a copy when a copy is stolen, so in that case "
+#| "the company has not violated the GPL."
+msgid ""
+"The company has violated the GPL and will have to cease distribution of that "
+"program. Note how this differs from the theft case above; the company does "
+"not intentionally distribute a copy when a copy is stolen, so in that case "
+"the company has not violated the GPL."
 msgstr ""
 "Si una empresa le facilita a usted una copia y afirma que se trata de un "
 "secreto comercial, la empresa estaría vulnerando la GPL y tendría que dejar 
"
@@ -5162,6 +5204,36 @@
 "modo que en tal caso la empresa no vulnera la GPL."
 
 #. type: Content of: <dl><dt>
+# | What if a company distributes a copy {+of its own GPL-covered work to me+}
+# | as a trade secret? <span class=\"anchor-reference-id\">(<a
+# | [-href=\"#TradeSecretRelease\" >#TradeSecretRelease</a>)</span>-]
+# | {+href=\"#TradeSecretRelease2\" >#TradeSecretRelease2</a>)</span>+}
+#, fuzzy
+#| msgid ""
+#| "What if a company distributes a copy as a trade secret? <span class="
+#| "\"anchor-reference-id\">(<a href=\"#TradeSecretRelease\" "
+#| ">#TradeSecretRelease</a>)</span>"
+msgid ""
+"What if a company distributes a copy of its own GPL-covered work to me as a "
+"trade secret? <span class=\"anchor-reference-id\">(<a href="
+"\"#TradeSecretRelease2\" >#TradeSecretRelease2</a>)</span>"
+msgstr ""
+"¿Qué sucede si una empresa distribuye una copia como secreto comercial? "
+"<span class=\"anchor-reference-id\">(<a href=\"#TradeSecretRelease\" "
+">#TradeSecretRelease</a>)</span>"
+
+#. type: Content of: <dl><dd><p>
+msgid ""
+"If the program distributed does not incorporate anyone else's GPL-covered "
+"work, then the company is not violating the GPL (see &ldquo;<a href="
+"\"#DeveloperViolate\">Is the developer of a GPL-covered program bound by the "
+"GPL?</a>&rdquo; for more information). But it is making two contradictory "
+"statements about what you can do with that program: that you can "
+"redistribute it, and that you can't. It would make sense to demand "
+"clarification of the terms for use of that program before you accept a copy."
+msgstr ""
+
+#. type: Content of: <dl><dt>
 msgid ""
 "Why are some GNU libraries released under the ordinary GPL rather than the "
 "Lesser GPL? <span class=\"anchor-reference-id\">(<a href="

Index: gpl-faq.fr.po
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/licenses/po/gpl-faq.fr.po,v
retrieving revision 1.218
retrieving revision 1.219
diff -u -b -r1.218 -r1.219
--- gpl-faq.fr.po       12 Apr 2019 16:11:56 -0000      1.218
+++ gpl-faq.fr.po       1 Aug 2019 09:00:41 -0000       1.219
@@ -10,7 +10,7 @@
 msgid ""
 msgstr ""
 "Project-Id-Version: gpl-faq.html\n"
-"POT-Creation-Date: 2019-04-12 15:26+0000\n"
+"POT-Creation-Date: 2019-08-01 08:55+0000\n"
 "PO-Revision-Date: 2019-04-12 18:11+0200\n"
 "Last-Translator: Thérèse Godefroy <godef.th AT free.fr>\n"
 "Language-Team: French <address@hidden>\n"
@@ -18,6 +18,7 @@
 "MIME-Version: 1.0\n"
 "Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8\n"
 "Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit\n"
+"X-Outdated-Since: 2019-08-01 08:55+0000\n"
 "Plural-Forms: \n"
 "X-Generator: Gtranslator 2.91.5\n"
 
@@ -892,9 +893,29 @@
 "version ?</a>"
 
 #. type: Content of: <ul><li>
+# | <a href=\"#TradeSecretRelease\">What if a company distributes a copy {+of
+# | some other developers' GPL-covered work to me+} as a trade secret?</a>
+#, fuzzy
+#| msgid ""
+#| "<a href=\"#TradeSecretRelease\">What if a company distributes a copy as a "
+#| "trade secret?</a>"
 msgid ""
-"<a href=\"#TradeSecretRelease\">What if a company distributes a copy as a "
-"trade secret?</a>"
+"<a href=\"#TradeSecretRelease\">What if a company distributes a copy of some "
+"other developers' GPL-covered work to me as a trade secret?</a>"
+msgstr ""
+"<a href=\"#TradeSecretRelease\">Et si une société distribuait une copie 
sous "
+"couvert du secret industriel ?</a>"
+
+#. type: Content of: <ul><li>
+# | <a href=\"#TradeSecretRelease{+2+}\">What if a company distributes a copy
+# | {+of its own GPL-covered work to me+} as a trade secret?</a>
+#, fuzzy
+#| msgid ""
+#| "<a href=\"#TradeSecretRelease\">What if a company distributes a copy as a "
+#| "trade secret?</a>"
+msgid ""
+"<a href=\"#TradeSecretRelease2\">What if a company distributes a copy of its "
+"own GPL-covered work to me as a trade secret?</a>"
 msgstr ""
 "<a href=\"#TradeSecretRelease\">Et si une société distribuait une copie 
sous "
 "couvert du secret industriel ?</a>"
@@ -5160,22 +5181,43 @@
 "si la société n'a pas publié cette version, il n'y a pas eu violation."
 
 #. type: Content of: <dl><dt>
-msgid ""
-"What if a company distributes a copy as a trade secret? <span class=\"anchor-"
-"reference-id\">(<a href=\"#TradeSecretRelease\" >#TradeSecretRelease</a>)</"
-"span>"
+# | What if a company distributes a copy {+of some other developers'
+# | GPL-covered work to me+} as a trade secret? <span
+# | class=\"anchor-reference-id\">(<a href=\"#TradeSecretRelease\"
+# | >#TradeSecretRelease</a>)</span>
+#, fuzzy
+#| msgid ""
+#| "What if a company distributes a copy as a trade secret? <span class="
+#| "\"anchor-reference-id\">(<a href=\"#TradeSecretRelease\" "
+#| ">#TradeSecretRelease</a>)</span>"
+msgid ""
+"What if a company distributes a copy of some other developers' GPL-covered "
+"work to me as a trade secret? <span class=\"anchor-reference-id\">(<a href="
+"\"#TradeSecretRelease\" >#TradeSecretRelease</a>)</span>"
 msgstr ""
 "Et si une société distribuait une copie sous couvert du secret industriel 
? "
 "<span class=\"anchor-reference-id\">(<a href=\"#TradeSecretRelease\" "
 ">#TradeSecretRelease</a>)</span>"
 
 #. type: Content of: <dl><dd><p>
-msgid ""
-"If a company distributes a copy to you and claims it is a trade secret, the "
-"company has violated the GPL and will have to cease distribution.  Note how "
-"this differs from the theft case above; the company does not intentionally "
-"distribute a copy when a copy is stolen, so in that case the company has not "
-"violated the GPL."
+# | [-If a company distributes a copy to you and claims it is a trade secret,
+# | the-]{+The+} company has violated the GPL and will have to cease
+# | [-distribution.-] {+distribution of that program.+} Note how this differs
+# | from the theft case above; the company does not intentionally distribute a
+# | copy when a copy is stolen, so in that case the company has not violated
+# | the GPL.
+#, fuzzy
+#| msgid ""
+#| "If a company distributes a copy to you and claims it is a trade secret, "
+#| "the company has violated the GPL and will have to cease distribution.  "
+#| "Note how this differs from the theft case above; the company does not "
+#| "intentionally distribute a copy when a copy is stolen, so in that case "
+#| "the company has not violated the GPL."
+msgid ""
+"The company has violated the GPL and will have to cease distribution of that "
+"program. Note how this differs from the theft case above; the company does "
+"not intentionally distribute a copy when a copy is stolen, so in that case "
+"the company has not violated the GPL."
 msgstr ""
 "Si la société vous a distribué une copie en invoquant le secret 
industriel, "
 "la société a violé la GPL et doit cesser la distribution. Notez comme cela 
"
@@ -5184,6 +5226,36 @@
 "GPL."
 
 #. type: Content of: <dl><dt>
+# | What if a company distributes a copy {+of its own GPL-covered work to me+}
+# | as a trade secret? <span class=\"anchor-reference-id\">(<a
+# | [-href=\"#TradeSecretRelease\" >#TradeSecretRelease</a>)</span>-]
+# | {+href=\"#TradeSecretRelease2\" >#TradeSecretRelease2</a>)</span>+}
+#, fuzzy
+#| msgid ""
+#| "What if a company distributes a copy as a trade secret? <span class="
+#| "\"anchor-reference-id\">(<a href=\"#TradeSecretRelease\" "
+#| ">#TradeSecretRelease</a>)</span>"
+msgid ""
+"What if a company distributes a copy of its own GPL-covered work to me as a "
+"trade secret? <span class=\"anchor-reference-id\">(<a href="
+"\"#TradeSecretRelease2\" >#TradeSecretRelease2</a>)</span>"
+msgstr ""
+"Et si une société distribuait une copie sous couvert du secret industriel 
? "
+"<span class=\"anchor-reference-id\">(<a href=\"#TradeSecretRelease\" "
+">#TradeSecretRelease</a>)</span>"
+
+#. type: Content of: <dl><dd><p>
+msgid ""
+"If the program distributed does not incorporate anyone else's GPL-covered "
+"work, then the company is not violating the GPL (see &ldquo;<a href="
+"\"#DeveloperViolate\">Is the developer of a GPL-covered program bound by the "
+"GPL?</a>&rdquo; for more information). But it is making two contradictory "
+"statements about what you can do with that program: that you can "
+"redistribute it, and that you can't. It would make sense to demand "
+"clarification of the terms for use of that program before you accept a copy."
+msgstr ""
+
+#. type: Content of: <dl><dt>
 msgid ""
 "Why are some GNU libraries released under the ordinary GPL rather than the "
 "Lesser GPL? <span class=\"anchor-reference-id\">(<a href="

Index: gpl-faq.it-diff.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/licenses/po/gpl-faq.it-diff.html,v
retrieving revision 1.8
retrieving revision 1.9
diff -u -b -r1.8 -r1.9
--- gpl-faq.it-diff.html        12 Apr 2019 15:31:23 -0000      1.8
+++ gpl-faq.it-diff.html        1 Aug 2019 09:00:41 -0000       1.9
@@ -448,7 +448,11 @@
     redistribute that version?&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/li&gt;
 
     &lt;li&gt;&lt;a href="#TradeSecretRelease"&gt;What if a company 
distributes a
-    copy as a trade secret?&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/li&gt;
+    copy <span class="inserted"><ins><em>of some other developers' GPL-covered 
work to me as a trade
+    secret?&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/li&gt;
+
+    &lt;li&gt;&lt;a href="#TradeSecretRelease2"&gt;What if a company 
distributes a
+    copy of its own GPL-covered work to me</em></ins></span> as a trade 
secret?&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/li&gt;
 
     &lt;li&gt;&lt;a href="#GPLFairUse"&gt;Do I have &ldquo;fair use&rdquo; 
rights in
     using the source code of a GPL-covered program?&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/li&gt;
@@ -2494,19 +2498,37 @@
 hasn't released this version, no such violation has 
occurred.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/dd&gt;
 
 
-&lt;dt id="TradeSecretRelease"&gt;What if a company distributes a copy as
-    a trade secret?
+&lt;dt id="TradeSecretRelease"&gt;What if a company distributes a copy <span 
class="inserted"><ins><em>of
+    some other developers' GPL-covered work to me</em></ins></span> as a trade 
secret?
  &lt;span class="anchor-reference-id"&gt;(&lt;a href="#TradeSecretRelease"
  &gt;#TradeSecretRelease&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/dt&gt;
 &lt;dd&gt;&lt;p&gt;
-If a company distributes a copy to you and claims it is a trade
-secret, the company has violated the GPL and will have to cease
-distribution.  Note how this differs from the theft case above; the
+<span class="removed"><del><strong>If a company distributes a copy to you and 
claims it is a trade
+secret, the</strong></del></span>
+<span class="inserted"><ins><em>The</em></ins></span> company has violated the 
GPL and will have to cease
+<span class="removed"><del><strong>distribution.</strong></del></span> <span 
class="inserted"><ins><em>distribution
+of that program.</em></ins></span> Note how this differs from the theft case 
above; the
 company does not intentionally distribute a copy when a copy is
 stolen, so in that case the company has not violated the 
GPL.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/dd&gt;
 
 
-&lt;dt id="WhySomeGPLAndNotLGPL"&gt;Why are some GNU libraries released under
+&lt;dt <span class="inserted"><ins><em>id="TradeSecretRelease2"&gt;What if a 
company distributes a copy
+    of its own GPL-covered work to me as a trade secret?
+ &lt;span class="anchor-reference-id"&gt;(&lt;a href="#TradeSecretRelease2"
+ &gt;#TradeSecretRelease2&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/dt&gt;
+
+&lt;dd&gt;&lt;p&gt;
+If the program distributed does not incorporate anyone else's
+GPL-covered work, then the company is not violating the GPL (see
+&ldquo;&lt;a href="#DeveloperViolate"&gt;Is the developer of a GPL-covered
+program bound by the GPL?&lt;/a&gt;&rdquo; for more information). But it is
+making two contradictory statements about what you can do with that
+program: that you can redistribute it, and that you can't. It would
+make sense to demand clarification of the terms for use of that program
+before you accept a copy.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/dd&gt;
+
+
+&lt;dt</em></ins></span> id="WhySomeGPLAndNotLGPL"&gt;Why are some GNU 
libraries released under
     the ordinary GPL rather than the Lesser GPL?
  &lt;span class="anchor-reference-id"&gt;(&lt;a href="#WhySomeGPLAndNotLGPL"
  &gt;#WhySomeGPLAndNotLGPL&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/dt&gt;
@@ -3959,7 +3981,7 @@
 
 &lt;p class="unprintable"&gt;Updated:
 &lt;!-- timestamp start --&gt;
-$Date: 2019/04/12 15:31:23 $
+$Date: 2019/08/01 09:00:41 $
 &lt;!-- timestamp end --&gt;
 &lt;/p&gt;
 &lt;/div&gt;

Index: gpl-faq.it.po
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/licenses/po/gpl-faq.it.po,v
retrieving revision 1.68
retrieving revision 1.69
diff -u -b -r1.68 -r1.69
--- gpl-faq.it.po       12 Apr 2019 15:31:23 -0000      1.68
+++ gpl-faq.it.po       1 Aug 2019 09:00:41 -0000       1.69
@@ -11,7 +11,7 @@
 msgid ""
 msgstr ""
 "Project-Id-Version: gpl-faq.html\n"
-"POT-Creation-Date: 2019-04-12 15:26+0000\n"
+"POT-Creation-Date: 2019-08-01 08:55+0000\n"
 "PO-Revision-Date: 2018-11-19 17:42+0100\n"
 "Last-Translator: Andrea Pescetti <address@hidden>\n"
 "Language-Team: Italian <address@hidden>\n"
@@ -916,9 +916,29 @@
 "quella versione?</a>"
 
 #. type: Content of: <ul><li>
+# | <a href=\"#TradeSecretRelease\">What if a company distributes a copy {+of
+# | some other developers' GPL-covered work to me+} as a trade secret?</a>
+#, fuzzy
+#| msgid ""
+#| "<a href=\"#TradeSecretRelease\">What if a company distributes a copy as a "
+#| "trade secret?</a>"
 msgid ""
-"<a href=\"#TradeSecretRelease\">What if a company distributes a copy as a "
-"trade secret?</a>"
+"<a href=\"#TradeSecretRelease\">What if a company distributes a copy of some "
+"other developers' GPL-covered work to me as a trade secret?</a>"
+msgstr ""
+"<a href=\"#TradeSecretRelease\">E se una società distribuisse una copia come 
"
+"segreto industriale?</a>"
+
+#. type: Content of: <ul><li>
+# | <a href=\"#TradeSecretRelease{+2+}\">What if a company distributes a copy
+# | {+of its own GPL-covered work to me+} as a trade secret?</a>
+#, fuzzy
+#| msgid ""
+#| "<a href=\"#TradeSecretRelease\">What if a company distributes a copy as a "
+#| "trade secret?</a>"
+msgid ""
+"<a href=\"#TradeSecretRelease2\">What if a company distributes a copy of its "
+"own GPL-covered work to me as a trade secret?</a>"
 msgstr ""
 "<a href=\"#TradeSecretRelease\">E se una società distribuisse una copia come 
"
 "segreto industriale?</a>"
@@ -5331,22 +5351,43 @@
 "avvenuta alcuna violazione di questo genere."
 
 #. type: Content of: <dl><dt>
-msgid ""
-"What if a company distributes a copy as a trade secret? <span class=\"anchor-"
-"reference-id\">(<a href=\"#TradeSecretRelease\" >#TradeSecretRelease</a>)</"
-"span>"
+# | What if a company distributes a copy {+of some other developers'
+# | GPL-covered work to me+} as a trade secret? <span
+# | class=\"anchor-reference-id\">(<a href=\"#TradeSecretRelease\"
+# | >#TradeSecretRelease</a>)</span>
+#, fuzzy
+#| msgid ""
+#| "What if a company distributes a copy as a trade secret? <span class="
+#| "\"anchor-reference-id\">(<a href=\"#TradeSecretRelease\" "
+#| ">#TradeSecretRelease</a>)</span>"
+msgid ""
+"What if a company distributes a copy of some other developers' GPL-covered "
+"work to me as a trade secret? <span class=\"anchor-reference-id\">(<a href="
+"\"#TradeSecretRelease\" >#TradeSecretRelease</a>)</span>"
 msgstr ""
 "E se una società distribuisse una copia come segreto industriale? <span "
 "class=\"anchor-reference-id\">(<a href=\"#TradeSecretRelease\" "
 ">#TradeSecretRelease</a>)</span>"
 
 #. type: Content of: <dl><dd><p>
-msgid ""
-"If a company distributes a copy to you and claims it is a trade secret, the "
-"company has violated the GPL and will have to cease distribution.  Note how "
-"this differs from the theft case above; the company does not intentionally "
-"distribute a copy when a copy is stolen, so in that case the company has not "
-"violated the GPL."
+# | [-If a company distributes a copy to you and claims it is a trade secret,
+# | the-]{+The+} company has violated the GPL and will have to cease
+# | [-distribution.-] {+distribution of that program.+} Note how this differs
+# | from the theft case above; the company does not intentionally distribute a
+# | copy when a copy is stolen, so in that case the company has not violated
+# | the GPL.
+#, fuzzy
+#| msgid ""
+#| "If a company distributes a copy to you and claims it is a trade secret, "
+#| "the company has violated the GPL and will have to cease distribution.  "
+#| "Note how this differs from the theft case above; the company does not "
+#| "intentionally distribute a copy when a copy is stolen, so in that case "
+#| "the company has not violated the GPL."
+msgid ""
+"The company has violated the GPL and will have to cease distribution of that "
+"program. Note how this differs from the theft case above; the company does "
+"not intentionally distribute a copy when a copy is stolen, so in that case "
+"the company has not violated the GPL."
 msgstr ""
 "Se la società distribuisce a qualcuno una copia sostenendo che sia segreto "
 "industriale, la società sta violando la GPL e dovrà cessare la "
@@ -5356,6 +5397,36 @@
 "la GPL."
 
 #. type: Content of: <dl><dt>
+# | What if a company distributes a copy {+of its own GPL-covered work to me+}
+# | as a trade secret? <span class=\"anchor-reference-id\">(<a
+# | [-href=\"#TradeSecretRelease\" >#TradeSecretRelease</a>)</span>-]
+# | {+href=\"#TradeSecretRelease2\" >#TradeSecretRelease2</a>)</span>+}
+#, fuzzy
+#| msgid ""
+#| "What if a company distributes a copy as a trade secret? <span class="
+#| "\"anchor-reference-id\">(<a href=\"#TradeSecretRelease\" "
+#| ">#TradeSecretRelease</a>)</span>"
+msgid ""
+"What if a company distributes a copy of its own GPL-covered work to me as a "
+"trade secret? <span class=\"anchor-reference-id\">(<a href="
+"\"#TradeSecretRelease2\" >#TradeSecretRelease2</a>)</span>"
+msgstr ""
+"E se una società distribuisse una copia come segreto industriale? <span "
+"class=\"anchor-reference-id\">(<a href=\"#TradeSecretRelease\" "
+">#TradeSecretRelease</a>)</span>"
+
+#. type: Content of: <dl><dd><p>
+msgid ""
+"If the program distributed does not incorporate anyone else's GPL-covered "
+"work, then the company is not violating the GPL (see &ldquo;<a href="
+"\"#DeveloperViolate\">Is the developer of a GPL-covered program bound by the "
+"GPL?</a>&rdquo; for more information). But it is making two contradictory "
+"statements about what you can do with that program: that you can "
+"redistribute it, and that you can't. It would make sense to demand "
+"clarification of the terms for use of that program before you accept a copy."
+msgstr ""
+
+#. type: Content of: <dl><dt>
 msgid ""
 "Why are some GNU libraries released under the ordinary GPL rather than the "
 "Lesser GPL? <span class=\"anchor-reference-id\">(<a href="

Index: gpl-faq.ja-diff.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/licenses/po/gpl-faq.ja-diff.html,v
retrieving revision 1.18
retrieving revision 1.19
diff -u -b -r1.18 -r1.19
--- gpl-faq.ja-diff.html        26 Jun 2019 20:32:16 -0000      1.18
+++ gpl-faq.ja-diff.html        1 Aug 2019 09:00:41 -0000       1.19
@@ -448,7 +448,11 @@
     redistribute that version?&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/li&gt;
 
     &lt;li&gt;&lt;a href="#TradeSecretRelease"&gt;What if a company 
distributes a
-    copy as a trade secret?&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/li&gt;
+    copy <span class="inserted"><ins><em>of some other developers' GPL-covered 
work to me as a trade
+    secret?&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/li&gt;
+
+    &lt;li&gt;&lt;a href="#TradeSecretRelease2"&gt;What if a company 
distributes a
+    copy of its own GPL-covered work to me</em></ins></span> as a trade 
secret?&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/li&gt;
 
     &lt;li&gt;&lt;a href="#GPLFairUse"&gt;Do I have &ldquo;fair use&rdquo; 
rights in
     using the source code of a GPL-covered program?&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/li&gt;
@@ -1697,19 +1701,24 @@
  &lt;span class="anchor-reference-id"&gt;(&lt;a href="#IfLibraryIsGPL"
  &gt;#IfLibraryIsGPL&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/dt&gt;
 &lt;dd&gt;&lt;p&gt;
-Yes, because the <span class="inserted"><ins><em>program actually links to the 
library. As such, 
-the terms of the GPL apply to the entire combination. The</em></ins></span> 
software <span class="inserted"><ins><em>modules
+Yes, because the <span class="removed"><del><strong>software as it 
is</strong></del></span> <span 
class="inserted"><ins><em>program</em></ins></span> actually <span 
class="removed"><del><strong>run includes</strong></del></span> <span 
class="inserted"><ins><em>links to</em></ins></span> the
+<span class="removed"><del><strong>library.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/dd&gt;
+
+
+&lt;dt id="IfInterpreterIsGPL"&gt;If a programming language interpreter
+    is released under</strong></del></span> <span 
class="inserted"><ins><em>library. As such,</em></ins></span> 
+the <span class="removed"><del><strong>GPL, does that mean programs 
written</strong></del></span> <span class="inserted"><ins><em>terms of the GPL 
apply</em></ins></span> to <span class="removed"><del><strong>be
+    interpreted</strong></del></span> <span class="inserted"><ins><em>the 
entire combination. The software modules
 that link with the library may be under various GPL compatible licenses, but 
the 
-work</em></ins></span> as <span class="inserted"><ins><em>a whole must be 
licensed under the GPL. See also:
-&lt;a href="#WhatDoesCompatMean"&gt;What does</em></ins></span> it <span 
class="inserted"><ins><em>mean to say a license</em></ins></span> is <span 
class="removed"><del><strong>actually run includes</strong></del></span>
-<span class="inserted"><ins><em>&ldquo;compatible with</em></ins></span> the
-<span 
class="removed"><del><strong>library.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/dd&gt;</strong></del></span>
 <span class="inserted"><ins><em>GPL&rdquo;?&lt;/a&gt;
-&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/dd&gt;</em></ins></span>
+work as a whole must be licensed under the GPL. See also:
+&lt;a href="#WhatDoesCompatMean"&gt;What does it mean to say a license is
+&ldquo;compatible with the GPL&rdquo;?&lt;/a&gt;
+&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/dd&gt;
 
 
 &lt;dt id="IfInterpreterIsGPL"&gt;If a programming language interpreter
     is released under the GPL, does that mean programs written to be
-    interpreted by it must be under GPL-compatible licenses?
+    interpreted</em></ins></span> by it must be under GPL-compatible licenses?
  &lt;span class="anchor-reference-id"&gt;(&lt;a href="#IfInterpreterIsGPL"
  &gt;#IfInterpreterIsGPL&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/dt&gt;
 &lt;dd&gt;&lt;p&gt;
@@ -1839,12 +1848,12 @@
  &gt;#GPLPluginsInNF&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/dt&gt;</strong></del></span> 
<span class="inserted"><ins><em>href="#GPLAndPlugins"
  &gt;#GPLAndPlugins&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/dt&gt;</em></ins></span>
 &lt;dd&gt;&lt;p&gt;
-<span class="inserted"><ins><em>Please see this question &lt;a 
href="#GPLPlugins"&gt;for determining when
-plug-ins and a main program are considered a single combined program
-and when they are considered separate works&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
+<span class="removed"><del><strong>If the program uses fork and exec to invoke 
plug-ins, then the</strong></del></span>
+<span class="inserted"><ins><em>Please see this question &lt;a 
href="#GPLPlugins"&gt;for determining when</em></ins></span>
+plug-ins <span class="inserted"><ins><em>and a main program are considered a 
single combined program
+and when they</em></ins></span> are <span 
class="inserted"><ins><em>considered</em></ins></span> separate <span 
class="removed"><del><strong>programs, so</strong></del></span> <span 
class="inserted"><ins><em>works&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
 
-&lt;p&gt;</em></ins></span> If the <span 
class="inserted"><ins><em>main</em></ins></span> program <span 
class="removed"><del><strong>uses fork</strong></del></span> and <span 
class="removed"><del><strong>exec to invoke plug-ins, 
then</strong></del></span> the
-<span class="removed"><del><strong>plug-ins</strong></del></span> <span 
class="inserted"><ins><em>plugins</em></ins></span> are <span 
class="removed"><del><strong>separate programs, so the</strong></del></span> 
<span class="inserted"><ins><em>a single combined program then this means
+&lt;p&gt; If</em></ins></span> the <span class="inserted"><ins><em>main 
program and the plugins are a single combined program then this means
 you must</em></ins></span> license <span 
class="removed"><del><strong>for</strong></del></span> the <span 
class="inserted"><ins><em>plug-in under the GPL or a GPL-compatible free
 software license and distribute it with source code in a GPL-compliant
 way. A</em></ins></span> main program <span class="inserted"><ins><em>that is 
separate from its plug-ins</em></ins></span> makes no
@@ -1857,9 +1866,9 @@
  &gt;#GPLPluginsInNF&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/dt&gt;
 &lt;dd&gt;&lt;p&gt;
  Please see this question &lt;a href="#GPLPlugins"&gt;for determining when
-plug-ins</em></ins></span> and <span class="removed"><del><strong>there are no 
special requirements.&lt;/p&gt;
+plug-ins</em></ins></span> and <span 
class="removed"><del><strong>there</strong></del></span> <span 
class="inserted"><ins><em>a main program</em></ins></span> are <span 
class="removed"><del><strong>no special requirements.&lt;/p&gt;
 
-&lt;p&gt;If the</strong></del></span> <span class="inserted"><ins><em>a main 
program are considered a single combined</em></ins></span> program <span 
class="removed"><del><strong>dynamically links plug-ins,</strong></del></span>
+&lt;p&gt;If the</strong></del></span> <span 
class="inserted"><ins><em>considered a single combined</em></ins></span> 
program <span class="removed"><del><strong>dynamically links 
plug-ins,</strong></del></span>
 and <span class="inserted"><ins><em>when</em></ins></span> they <span 
class="removed"><del><strong>make function
 calls to each other and share data structures, we 
believe</strong></del></span> <span class="inserted"><ins><em>are considered 
separate programs&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
 &lt;p&gt; If</em></ins></span> they form a
@@ -1894,12 +1903,12 @@
 If</em></ins></span> they form a single <span 
class="removed"><del><strong>program, which must be treated as an extension of 
both the main</strong></del></span> <span 
class="inserted"><ins><em>combined</em></ins></span> program <span 
class="removed"><del><strong>and the plug-ins.  In order to use the GPL-covered 
plug-ins,</strong></del></span> <span 
class="inserted"><ins><em>then</em></ins></span> the
 main program must be released under the GPL or a GPL-compatible free
 software license, and <span 
class="removed"><del><strong>that</strong></del></span> the terms of the GPL 
must be followed when
-the main program is distributed for use with these plug-ins.&lt;/p&gt;
+the main program is <span class="removed"><del><strong>distributed for use 
with these plug-ins.&lt;/p&gt;
 
-<span class="removed"><del><strong>&lt;p&gt;If the program dynamically links 
plug-ins, but the communication
-between them is limited to invoking</strong></del></span>
+&lt;p&gt;If the program dynamically links plug-ins, but the communication
+between them is limited to invoking</strong></del></span> <span 
class="inserted"><ins><em>distributed for use with these plug-ins.&lt;/p&gt;
     
-<span class="inserted"><ins><em>&lt;p&gt;However, if they are separate works 
then</em></ins></span> the <span 
class="removed"><del><strong>&lsquo;main&rsquo; function</strong></del></span> 
<span class="inserted"><ins><em>license</em></ins></span> of the plug-in <span 
class="removed"><del><strong>with some options and waiting for it to return, 
that is a
+&lt;p&gt;However, if they are separate works then</em></ins></span> the <span 
class="removed"><del><strong>&lsquo;main&rsquo; function</strong></del></span> 
<span class="inserted"><ins><em>license</em></ins></span> of the plug-in <span 
class="removed"><del><strong>with some options and waiting for it to return, 
that is a
 borderline case.&lt;/p&gt;
 
 &lt;p&gt;Using shared memory to communicate with complex data structures
@@ -2053,20 +2062,19 @@
 So when they are used for communication, the modules normally are
 separate programs.  But if the semantics of the communication are
 intimate enough, exchanging complex internal data structures, that too
-could be a basis to consider the <span class="removed"><del><strong>two parts 
as combined into</strong></del></span> <span class="inserted"><ins><em>two 
parts as combined into a larger
+could be a basis to consider the two parts as combined into a larger
 program.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/dd&gt;
 
-&lt;dt id="AggregateContainers"&gt;When it comes to determining
+&lt;dt <span class="inserted"><ins><em>id="AggregateContainers"&gt;When it 
comes to determining
     whether two pieces of software form a single work, does the fact
     that the code is in one or more containers have any effect?
  &lt;span class="anchor-reference-id"&gt;(&lt;a href="#AggregateContainers"
  &gt;#AggregateContainers&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/dt&gt;
-&lt;dd&gt;&lt;p&gt;No, the analysis of whether they are</em></ins></span> a 
<span class="removed"><del><strong>larger
-program.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/dd&gt;</strong></del></span> <span 
class="inserted"><ins><em>&lt;a
+&lt;dd&gt;&lt;p&gt;No, the analysis of whether they are a &lt;a
 href="#MereAggregation"&gt;single work or an
-aggregate&lt;/a&gt; is unchanged by the involvement of 
containers.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/dd&gt;</em></ins></span>
+aggregate&lt;/a&gt; is unchanged by the involvement of 
containers.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/dd&gt;
 
-&lt;dt id="AssignCopyright"&gt;Why does
+&lt;dt</em></ins></span> id="AssignCopyright"&gt;Why does
     the FSF require that contributors to FSF-copyrighted programs assign
     copyright to the FSF?  If I hold copyright on a <span 
class="removed"><del><strong>GPL'ed</strong></del></span> <span 
class="inserted"><ins><em>GPLed</em></ins></span> program, should
     I do this, too?  If so, how?
@@ -2470,36 +2478,38 @@
  &gt;#UnreleasedMods&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/dt&gt;
 &lt;dd&gt;&lt;p&gt;
 The GPL permits anyone to make a modified version and use it without
-ever distributing it to others. What this company is doing is a special
+ever distributing it to <span 
class="removed"><del><strong>others.</strong></del></span> <span 
class="inserted"><ins><em>others. What this company is doing is a special
 case of that. Therefore, the company does not have to release the
-modified <span class="removed"><del><strong>sources.&lt;/p&gt;
-
-&lt;p&gt;It</strong></del></span> <span class="inserted"><ins><em>sources. The 
situation</em></ins></span> is <span class="removed"><del><strong>essential for 
people</strong></del></span> <span class="inserted"><ins><em>different when the 
modified program
+modified sources. The situation is different when the modified program
 is licensed under the terms of the &lt;a
 href="#UnreleasedModsAGPL"&gt;GNU Affero GPL&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
 
-&lt;p&gt;Compare this</em></ins></span> to <span 
class="removed"><del><strong>have</strong></del></span> <span 
class="inserted"><ins><em>a situation where</em></ins></span> the <span 
class="removed"><del><strong>freedom</strong></del></span> <span 
class="inserted"><ins><em>web site contains or links</em></ins></span> to <span 
class="removed"><del><strong>make modifications and
-use them privately, without ever publishing those modifications.  However,
-putting</strong></del></span>
-<span class="inserted"><ins><em>separate GPLed programs that are distributed 
to the user when they
+&lt;p&gt;Compare this to a situation where the web site contains or links to
+separate GPLed programs that are distributed to the user when they
 visit the web site (often written in &lt;a
 href="/philosophy/javascript-trap.html"&gt;JavaScript&lt;/a&gt;, but other
 languages are used as well). In this situation the source code for the
 programs being distributed must be released to the user under the
-terms of</em></ins></span> the <span 
class="inserted"><ins><em>GPL.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/dd&gt;
+terms of the GPL.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/dd&gt;
 
 &lt;dt id="UnreleasedModsAGPL"&gt;A company is running a modified
-    version of a</em></ins></span> program <span 
class="inserted"><ins><em>licensed under the GNU Affero GPL 
(AGPL)</em></ins></span> on a <span class="removed"><del><strong>server machine 
for</strong></del></span>
-    <span class="inserted"><ins><em>web site. Does</em></ins></span> the <span 
class="removed"><del><strong>public to talk</strong></del></span> <span 
class="inserted"><ins><em>AGPL say they must release their modified
+    version of a program licensed under the GNU Affero GPL (AGPL) on a
+    web site. Does the AGPL say they must release their modified
     sources?
  &lt;span class="anchor-reference-id"&gt;(&lt;a href="#UnreleasedModsAGPL"
  &gt;#UnreleasedModsAGPL&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/dt&gt;
 &lt;dd&gt;&lt;p&gt;The &lt;a href="/licenses/agpl.html"&gt;GNU Affero 
GPL&lt;/a&gt;
 requires that modified versions of the software offer all users
-interacting with it over a computer network an opportunity</em></ins></span> 
to <span class="inserted"><ins><em>receive
-the source. What the company</em></ins></span> is <span 
class="removed"><del><strong>hardly
-&ldquo;private&rdquo; use,</strong></del></span> <span 
class="inserted"><ins><em>doing falls under that meaning,</em></ins></span> so 
<span class="removed"><del><strong>it would be legitimate to 
require</strong></del></span> <span class="inserted"><ins><em>the
-company must</em></ins></span> release <span 
class="removed"><del><strong>of</strong></del></span> the <span 
class="inserted"><ins><em>modified</em></ins></span> source <span 
class="removed"><del><strong>code in that special case.  Developers who wish to 
address this
+interacting with it over a computer network an opportunity to receive
+the source.</em></ins></span> What <span 
class="removed"><del><strong>this</strong></del></span> <span 
class="inserted"><ins><em>the</em></ins></span> company is doing <span 
class="removed"><del><strong>is a
+special case of that.  Therefore,</strong></del></span> <span 
class="inserted"><ins><em>falls under that meaning, so</em></ins></span> the
+company <span class="removed"><del><strong>does not have 
to</strong></del></span> <span class="inserted"><ins><em>must</em></ins></span> 
release the modified <span class="removed"><del><strong>sources.&lt;/p&gt;
+
+&lt;p&gt;It is essential for people to have the freedom to make modifications 
and
+use them privately, without ever publishing those modifications.  However,
+putting the program on a server machine for the public to talk to is hardly
+&ldquo;private&rdquo; use, so it would be legitimate to require release of
+the</strong></del></span> source <span class="removed"><del><strong>code in 
that special case.  Developers who wish to address this
 might want to use the
 &lt;a href="/licenses/agpl.html"&gt;GNU&nbsp;Affero&nbsp;GPL&lt;/a&gt; for 
programs
 designed for network server use.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/dd&gt;</strong></del></span> 
<span class="inserted"><ins><em>code.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/dd&gt;</em></ins></span>
@@ -2539,19 +2549,37 @@
 hasn't released this version, no such violation has 
occurred.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/dd&gt;
 
 
-&lt;dt id="TradeSecretRelease"&gt;What if a company distributes a copy as
-    a trade secret?
+&lt;dt id="TradeSecretRelease"&gt;What if a company distributes a copy <span 
class="inserted"><ins><em>of
+    some other developers' GPL-covered work to me</em></ins></span> as a trade 
secret?
  &lt;span class="anchor-reference-id"&gt;(&lt;a href="#TradeSecretRelease"
  &gt;#TradeSecretRelease&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/dt&gt;
 &lt;dd&gt;&lt;p&gt;
-If a company distributes a copy to you and claims it is a trade
-secret, the company has violated the GPL and will have to cease
-distribution.  Note how this differs from the theft case above; the
+<span class="removed"><del><strong>If a company distributes a copy to you and 
claims it is a trade
+secret, the</strong></del></span>
+<span class="inserted"><ins><em>The</em></ins></span> company has violated the 
GPL and will have to cease
+<span class="removed"><del><strong>distribution.</strong></del></span> <span 
class="inserted"><ins><em>distribution
+of that program.</em></ins></span> Note how this differs from the theft case 
above; the
 company does not intentionally distribute a copy when a copy is
 stolen, so in that case the company has not violated the 
GPL.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/dd&gt;
 
 
-&lt;dt id="WhySomeGPLAndNotLGPL"&gt;Why are some GNU libraries released under
+&lt;dt <span class="inserted"><ins><em>id="TradeSecretRelease2"&gt;What if a 
company distributes a copy
+    of its own GPL-covered work to me as a trade secret?
+ &lt;span class="anchor-reference-id"&gt;(&lt;a href="#TradeSecretRelease2"
+ &gt;#TradeSecretRelease2&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/dt&gt;
+
+&lt;dd&gt;&lt;p&gt;
+If the program distributed does not incorporate anyone else's
+GPL-covered work, then the company is not violating the GPL (see
+&ldquo;&lt;a href="#DeveloperViolate"&gt;Is the developer of a GPL-covered
+program bound by the GPL?&lt;/a&gt;&rdquo; for more information). But it is
+making two contradictory statements about what you can do with that
+program: that you can redistribute it, and that you can't. It would
+make sense to demand clarification of the terms for use of that program
+before you accept a copy.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/dd&gt;
+
+
+&lt;dt</em></ins></span> id="WhySomeGPLAndNotLGPL"&gt;Why are some GNU 
libraries released under
     the ordinary GPL rather than the Lesser GPL?
  &lt;span class="anchor-reference-id"&gt;(&lt;a href="#WhySomeGPLAndNotLGPL"
  &gt;#WhySomeGPLAndNotLGPL&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/dt&gt;
@@ -4005,7 +4033,7 @@
 
 &lt;p class="unprintable"&gt;Updated:
 &lt;!-- timestamp start --&gt;
-$Date: 2019/06/26 20:32:16 $
+$Date: 2019/08/01 09:00:41 $
 &lt;!-- timestamp end --&gt;
 &lt;/p&gt;
 &lt;/div&gt;

Index: gpl-faq.ja.po
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/licenses/po/gpl-faq.ja.po,v
retrieving revision 1.94
retrieving revision 1.95
diff -u -b -r1.94 -r1.95
--- gpl-faq.ja.po       12 Apr 2019 15:31:23 -0000      1.94
+++ gpl-faq.ja.po       1 Aug 2019 09:00:42 -0000       1.95
@@ -6,7 +6,7 @@
 msgid ""
 msgstr ""
 "Project-Id-Version: gpl-faq.html\n"
-"POT-Creation-Date: 2019-04-12 15:26+0000\n"
+"POT-Creation-Date: 2019-08-01 08:55+0000\n"
 "PO-Revision-Date: 2017-01-11 09:42+0900\n"
 "Last-Translator: NIIBE Yutaka <address@hidden>\n"
 "Language-Team: Japanese <address@hidden>\n"
@@ -901,9 +901,25 @@
 "ました。GPLはかれにこのバージョンを再é…
å¸ƒã™ã‚‹æ¨©åˆ©ã‚’与えますか?</a>"
 
 #. type: Content of: <ul><li>
+#, fuzzy
+#| msgid ""
+#| "<a href=\"#TradeSecretRelease\">What if a company distributes a copy as a "
+#| "trade secret?</a>"
 msgid ""
-"<a href=\"#TradeSecretRelease\">What if a company distributes a copy as a "
-"trade secret?</a>"
+"<a href=\"#TradeSecretRelease\">What if a company distributes a copy of some "
+"other developers' GPL-covered work to me as a trade secret?</a>"
+msgstr ""
+"<a 
href=\"#TradeSecretRelease\">ある会社があるコピーをトレード・シークレット"
+"として配布したらどうですか?</a>"
+
+#. type: Content of: <ul><li>
+#, fuzzy
+#| msgid ""
+#| "<a href=\"#TradeSecretRelease\">What if a company distributes a copy as a "
+#| "trade secret?</a>"
+msgid ""
+"<a href=\"#TradeSecretRelease2\">What if a company distributes a copy of its "
+"own GPL-covered work to me as a trade secret?</a>"
 msgstr ""
 "<a 
href=\"#TradeSecretRelease\">ある会社があるコピーをトレード・シークレット"
 "として配布したらどうですか?</a>"
@@ -5340,22 +5356,33 @@
 "そのような違反は起こりません。"
 
 #. type: Content of: <dl><dt>
-msgid ""
-"What if a company distributes a copy as a trade secret? <span class=\"anchor-"
-"reference-id\">(<a href=\"#TradeSecretRelease\" >#TradeSecretRelease</a>)</"
-"span>"
+#, fuzzy
+#| msgid ""
+#| "What if a company distributes a copy as a trade secret? <span class="
+#| "\"anchor-reference-id\">(<a href=\"#TradeSecretRelease\" "
+#| ">#TradeSecretRelease</a>)</span>"
+msgid ""
+"What if a company distributes a copy of some other developers' GPL-covered "
+"work to me as a trade secret? <span class=\"anchor-reference-id\">(<a href="
+"\"#TradeSecretRelease\" >#TradeSecretRelease</a>)</span>"
 msgstr ""
 "ある会社があるコピーをトレード・シークレットとしてé…
å¸ƒã—たらどうですか? "
 "<span class=\"anchor-reference-id\">(<a href=\"#TradeSecretRelease\" "
 ">#TradeSecretRelease</a>)</span>"
 
 #. type: Content of: <dl><dd><p>
-msgid ""
-"If a company distributes a copy to you and claims it is a trade secret, the "
-"company has violated the GPL and will have to cease distribution.  Note how "
-"this differs from the theft case above; the company does not intentionally "
-"distribute a copy when a copy is stolen, so in that case the company has not "
-"violated the GPL."
+#, fuzzy
+#| msgid ""
+#| "If a company distributes a copy to you and claims it is a trade secret, "
+#| "the company has violated the GPL and will have to cease distribution.  "
+#| "Note how this differs from the theft case above; the company does not "
+#| "intentionally distribute a copy when a copy is stolen, so in that case "
+#| "the company has not violated the GPL."
+msgid ""
+"The company has violated the GPL and will have to cease distribution of that "
+"program. Note how this differs from the theft case above; the company does "
+"not intentionally distribute a copy when a copy is stolen, so in that case "
+"the company has not violated the GPL."
 msgstr ""
 "もし、ある会社があるコピーをあなたにé…
å¸ƒã—て、それをトレード・シークレットと"
 "主張するならば、その会社はGPLに違反しており、é…
å¸ƒã‚’停止しなければなりません。"
@@ -5363,6 +5390,32 @@
 "をé…
å¸ƒã—たのではないので、そのケースではGPLには違反していないのです。"
 
 #. type: Content of: <dl><dt>
+#, fuzzy
+#| msgid ""
+#| "What if a company distributes a copy as a trade secret? <span class="
+#| "\"anchor-reference-id\">(<a href=\"#TradeSecretRelease\" "
+#| ">#TradeSecretRelease</a>)</span>"
+msgid ""
+"What if a company distributes a copy of its own GPL-covered work to me as a "
+"trade secret? <span class=\"anchor-reference-id\">(<a href="
+"\"#TradeSecretRelease2\" >#TradeSecretRelease2</a>)</span>"
+msgstr ""
+"ある会社があるコピーをトレード・シークレットとしてé…
å¸ƒã—たらどうですか? "
+"<span class=\"anchor-reference-id\">(<a href=\"#TradeSecretRelease\" "
+">#TradeSecretRelease</a>)</span>"
+
+#. type: Content of: <dl><dd><p>
+msgid ""
+"If the program distributed does not incorporate anyone else's GPL-covered "
+"work, then the company is not violating the GPL (see &ldquo;<a href="
+"\"#DeveloperViolate\">Is the developer of a GPL-covered program bound by the "
+"GPL?</a>&rdquo; for more information). But it is making two contradictory "
+"statements about what you can do with that program: that you can "
+"redistribute it, and that you can't. It would make sense to demand "
+"clarification of the terms for use of that program before you accept a copy."
+msgstr ""
+
+#. type: Content of: <dl><dt>
 msgid ""
 "Why are some GNU libraries released under the ordinary GPL rather than the "
 "Lesser GPL? <span class=\"anchor-reference-id\">(<a href="

Index: gpl-faq.pot
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/licenses/po/gpl-faq.pot,v
retrieving revision 1.88
retrieving revision 1.89
diff -u -b -r1.88 -r1.89
--- gpl-faq.pot 12 Apr 2019 15:31:23 -0000      1.88
+++ gpl-faq.pot 1 Aug 2019 09:00:42 -0000       1.89
@@ -7,7 +7,7 @@
 msgid ""
 msgstr ""
 "Project-Id-Version: gpl-faq.html\n"
-"POT-Creation-Date: 2019-04-12 15:26+0000\n"
+"POT-Creation-Date: 2019-08-01 08:55+0000\n"
 "PO-Revision-Date: YEAR-MO-DA HO:MI+ZONE\n"
 "Last-Translator: FULL NAME <EMAIL@ADDRESS>\n"
 "Language-Team: LANGUAGE <address@hidden>\n"
@@ -635,8 +635,14 @@
 
 #. type: Content of: <ul><li>
 msgid ""
-"<a href=\"#TradeSecretRelease\">What if a company distributes a copy as a "
-"trade secret?</a>"
+"<a href=\"#TradeSecretRelease\">What if a company distributes a copy of some "
+"other developers' GPL-covered work to me as a trade secret?</a>"
+msgstr ""
+
+#. type: Content of: <ul><li>
+msgid ""
+"<a href=\"#TradeSecretRelease2\">What if a company distributes a copy of its "
+"own GPL-covered work to me as a trade secret?</a>"
 msgstr ""
 
 #. type: Content of: <ul><li>
@@ -3443,18 +3449,35 @@
 
 #. type: Content of: <dl><dt>
 msgid ""
-"What if a company distributes a copy as a trade secret? <span "
-"class=\"anchor-reference-id\">(<a href=\"#TradeSecretRelease\" "
-">#TradeSecretRelease</a>)</span>"
+"What if a company distributes a copy of some other developers' GPL-covered "
+"work to me as a trade secret? <span class=\"anchor-reference-id\">(<a "
+"href=\"#TradeSecretRelease\" >#TradeSecretRelease</a>)</span>"
+msgstr ""
+
+#. type: Content of: <dl><dd><p>
+msgid ""
+"The company has violated the GPL and will have to cease distribution of that "
+"program. Note how this differs from the theft case above; the company does "
+"not intentionally distribute a copy when a copy is stolen, so in that case "
+"the company has not violated the GPL."
+msgstr ""
+
+#. type: Content of: <dl><dt>
+msgid ""
+"What if a company distributes a copy of its own GPL-covered work to me as a "
+"trade secret? <span class=\"anchor-reference-id\">(<a "
+"href=\"#TradeSecretRelease2\" >#TradeSecretRelease2</a>)</span>"
 msgstr ""
 
 #. type: Content of: <dl><dd><p>
 msgid ""
-"If a company distributes a copy to you and claims it is a trade secret, the "
-"company has violated the GPL and will have to cease distribution.  Note how "
-"this differs from the theft case above; the company does not intentionally "
-"distribute a copy when a copy is stolen, so in that case the company has not "
-"violated the GPL."
+"If the program distributed does not incorporate anyone else's GPL-covered "
+"work, then the company is not violating the GPL (see &ldquo;<a "
+"href=\"#DeveloperViolate\">Is the developer of a GPL-covered program bound "
+"by the GPL?</a>&rdquo; for more information). But it is making two "
+"contradictory statements about what you can do with that program: that you "
+"can redistribute it, and that you can't. It would make sense to demand "
+"clarification of the terms for use of that program before you accept a copy."
 msgstr ""
 
 #. type: Content of: <dl><dt>

Index: gpl-faq.ru.po
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/licenses/po/gpl-faq.ru.po,v
retrieving revision 1.165
retrieving revision 1.166
diff -u -b -r1.165 -r1.166
--- gpl-faq.ru.po       13 Jun 2019 16:02:18 -0000      1.165
+++ gpl-faq.ru.po       1 Aug 2019 09:00:42 -0000       1.166
@@ -11,7 +11,7 @@
 msgid ""
 msgstr ""
 "Project-Id-Version: gpl-faq.html\n"
-"POT-Creation-Date: 2019-04-12 15:26+0000\n"
+"POT-Creation-Date: 2019-08-01 08:55+0000\n"
 "PO-Revision-Date: 2019-04-12 17:17+0000\n"
 "Last-Translator: Ineiev <address@hidden>\n"
 "Language-Team: Russian <address@hidden>\n"
@@ -19,6 +19,7 @@
 "MIME-Version: 1.0\n"
 "Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8\n"
 "Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit\n"
+"X-Outdated-Since: 2019-08-01 08:55+0000\n"
 
 #. type: Content of: <title>
 msgid ""
@@ -874,9 +875,29 @@
 "a>"
 
 #. type: Content of: <ul><li>
+# | <a href=\"#TradeSecretRelease\">What if a company distributes a copy {+of
+# | some other developers' GPL-covered work to me+} as a trade secret?</a>
+#, fuzzy
+#| msgid ""
+#| "<a href=\"#TradeSecretRelease\">What if a company distributes a copy as a "
+#| "trade secret?</a>"
 msgid ""
-"<a href=\"#TradeSecretRelease\">What if a company distributes a copy as a "
-"trade secret?</a>"
+"<a href=\"#TradeSecretRelease\">What if a company distributes a copy of some "
+"other developers' GPL-covered work to me as a trade secret?</a>"
+msgstr ""
+"<a href=\"#TradeSecretRelease\">Что, если предприятие 
передает копию как "
+"коммерческую тайну?</a>"
+
+#. type: Content of: <ul><li>
+# | <a href=\"#TradeSecretRelease{+2+}\">What if a company distributes a copy
+# | {+of its own GPL-covered work to me+} as a trade secret?</a>
+#, fuzzy
+#| msgid ""
+#| "<a href=\"#TradeSecretRelease\">What if a company distributes a copy as a "
+#| "trade secret?</a>"
+msgid ""
+"<a href=\"#TradeSecretRelease2\">What if a company distributes a copy of its "
+"own GPL-covered work to me as a trade secret?</a>"
 msgstr ""
 "<a href=\"#TradeSecretRelease\">Что, если предприятие 
передает копию как "
 "коммерческую тайну?</a>"
@@ -5128,22 +5149,43 @@
 "если предприятие эту версию не выпустило, 
то такого нарушения не было."
 
 #. type: Content of: <dl><dt>
-msgid ""
-"What if a company distributes a copy as a trade secret? <span class=\"anchor-"
-"reference-id\">(<a href=\"#TradeSecretRelease\" >#TradeSecretRelease</a>)</"
-"span>"
+# | What if a company distributes a copy {+of some other developers'
+# | GPL-covered work to me+} as a trade secret? <span
+# | class=\"anchor-reference-id\">(<a href=\"#TradeSecretRelease\"
+# | >#TradeSecretRelease</a>)</span>
+#, fuzzy
+#| msgid ""
+#| "What if a company distributes a copy as a trade secret? <span class="
+#| "\"anchor-reference-id\">(<a href=\"#TradeSecretRelease\" "
+#| ">#TradeSecretRelease</a>)</span>"
+msgid ""
+"What if a company distributes a copy of some other developers' GPL-covered "
+"work to me as a trade secret? <span class=\"anchor-reference-id\">(<a href="
+"\"#TradeSecretRelease\" >#TradeSecretRelease</a>)</span>"
 msgstr ""
 "Что, если предприятие передает копию как 
коммерческую тайну? <span class="
 "\"anchor-reference-id\">(<a href=\"#TradeSecretRelease\" "
 ">#TradeSecretRelease</a>)</span>"
 
 #. type: Content of: <dl><dd><p>
-msgid ""
-"If a company distributes a copy to you and claims it is a trade secret, the "
-"company has violated the GPL and will have to cease distribution.  Note how "
-"this differs from the theft case above; the company does not intentionally "
-"distribute a copy when a copy is stolen, so in that case the company has not "
-"violated the GPL."
+# | [-If a company distributes a copy to you and claims it is a trade secret,
+# | the-]{+The+} company has violated the GPL and will have to cease
+# | [-distribution.-] {+distribution of that program.+} Note how this differs
+# | from the theft case above; the company does not intentionally distribute a
+# | copy when a copy is stolen, so in that case the company has not violated
+# | the GPL.
+#, fuzzy
+#| msgid ""
+#| "If a company distributes a copy to you and claims it is a trade secret, "
+#| "the company has violated the GPL and will have to cease distribution.  "
+#| "Note how this differs from the theft case above; the company does not "
+#| "intentionally distribute a copy when a copy is stolen, so in that case "
+#| "the company has not violated the GPL."
+msgid ""
+"The company has violated the GPL and will have to cease distribution of that "
+"program. Note how this differs from the theft case above; the company does "
+"not intentionally distribute a copy when a copy is stolen, so in that case "
+"the company has not violated the GPL."
 msgstr ""
 "Если предприятие передает вам копию и 
заявляет, что она является "
 "коммерческой тайной, это предприятие 
нарушило GPL и должно будет прекратить "
@@ -5152,6 +5194,36 @@
 "крадут, так что в этом случае предприятие 
не нарушает GPL."
 
 #. type: Content of: <dl><dt>
+# | What if a company distributes a copy {+of its own GPL-covered work to me+}
+# | as a trade secret? <span class=\"anchor-reference-id\">(<a
+# | [-href=\"#TradeSecretRelease\" >#TradeSecretRelease</a>)</span>-]
+# | {+href=\"#TradeSecretRelease2\" >#TradeSecretRelease2</a>)</span>+}
+#, fuzzy
+#| msgid ""
+#| "What if a company distributes a copy as a trade secret? <span class="
+#| "\"anchor-reference-id\">(<a href=\"#TradeSecretRelease\" "
+#| ">#TradeSecretRelease</a>)</span>"
+msgid ""
+"What if a company distributes a copy of its own GPL-covered work to me as a "
+"trade secret? <span class=\"anchor-reference-id\">(<a href="
+"\"#TradeSecretRelease2\" >#TradeSecretRelease2</a>)</span>"
+msgstr ""
+"Что, если предприятие передает копию как 
коммерческую тайну? <span class="
+"\"anchor-reference-id\">(<a href=\"#TradeSecretRelease\" "
+">#TradeSecretRelease</a>)</span>"
+
+#. type: Content of: <dl><dd><p>
+msgid ""
+"If the program distributed does not incorporate anyone else's GPL-covered "
+"work, then the company is not violating the GPL (see &ldquo;<a href="
+"\"#DeveloperViolate\">Is the developer of a GPL-covered program bound by the "
+"GPL?</a>&rdquo; for more information). But it is making two contradictory "
+"statements about what you can do with that program: that you can "
+"redistribute it, and that you can't. It would make sense to demand "
+"clarification of the terms for use of that program before you accept a copy."
+msgstr ""
+
+#. type: Content of: <dl><dt>
 msgid ""
 "Why are some GNU libraries released under the ordinary GPL rather than the "
 "Lesser GPL? <span class=\"anchor-reference-id\">(<a href="

Index: gpl-faq.ta.po
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/licenses/po/gpl-faq.ta.po,v
retrieving revision 1.79
retrieving revision 1.80
diff -u -b -r1.79 -r1.80
--- gpl-faq.ta.po       2 Jun 2019 10:30:54 -0000       1.79
+++ gpl-faq.ta.po       1 Aug 2019 09:00:42 -0000       1.80
@@ -9,7 +9,7 @@
 msgid ""
 msgstr ""
 "Project-Id-Version: gpl-faq.html\n"
-"POT-Creation-Date: 2019-04-12 15:26+0000\n"
+"POT-Creation-Date: 2019-08-01 08:55+0000\n"
 "PO-Revision-Date: 2010-06-20 15:55+0530\n"
 "Last-Translator: Amachu <address@hidden>\n"
 "Language-Team: Tamil <address@hidden>\n"
@@ -678,8 +678,14 @@
 
 #. type: Content of: <ul><li>
 msgid ""
-"<a href=\"#TradeSecretRelease\">What if a company distributes a copy as a "
-"trade secret?</a>"
+"<a href=\"#TradeSecretRelease\">What if a company distributes a copy of some "
+"other developers' GPL-covered work to me as a trade secret?</a>"
+msgstr ""
+
+#. type: Content of: <ul><li>
+msgid ""
+"<a href=\"#TradeSecretRelease2\">What if a company distributes a copy of its "
+"own GPL-covered work to me as a trade secret?</a>"
 msgstr ""
 
 #. type: Content of: <ul><li>
@@ -3610,19 +3616,61 @@
 msgstr ""
 
 #. type: Content of: <dl><dt>
+# | [-Why should I use the GNU GPL rather than-]{+What if a company
+# | distributes a copy of some+} other [-free software licenses?-]
+# | {+developers' GPL-covered work to me as a trade secret?+} <span
+# | class=\"anchor-reference-id\">(<a [-href=\"#WhyUseGPL\"
+# | >#WhyUseGPL</a>)</span>-] {+href=\"#TradeSecretRelease\"
+# | >#TradeSecretRelease</a>)</span>+}
+#, fuzzy
+#| msgid ""
+#| "Why should I use the GNU GPL rather than other free software licenses? "
+#| "<span class=\"anchor-reference-id\">(<a href=\"#WhyUseGPL\" >#WhyUseGPL</"
+#| "a>)</span>"
 msgid ""
-"What if a company distributes a copy as a trade secret? <span class=\"anchor-"
-"reference-id\">(<a href=\"#TradeSecretRelease\" >#TradeSecretRelease</a>)</"
-"span>"
+"What if a company distributes a copy of some other developers' GPL-covered "
+"work to me as a trade secret? <span class=\"anchor-reference-id\">(<a href="
+"\"#TradeSecretRelease\" >#TradeSecretRelease</a>)</span>"
 msgstr ""
+"ஏனைய கட்டற்ற உரிமங்களை 
காட்டிலும் நான் ஏன் GNU GPLஐ 
பயன்படுத்த வேண்டும்? <span class="
+"\"anchor-reference-id\">(<a href=\"#WhyUseGPL\" >#WhyUseGPL</a>)</span>"
+
+#. type: Content of: <dl><dd><p>
+msgid ""
+"The company has violated the GPL and will have to cease distribution of that "
+"program. Note how this differs from the theft case above; the company does "
+"not intentionally distribute a copy when a copy is stolen, so in that case "
+"the company has not violated the GPL."
+msgstr ""
+
+#. type: Content of: <dl><dt>
+# | [-Why should I use the GNU GPL rather than other free software
+# | licenses?-]{+What if a company distributes a copy of its own GPL-covered
+# | work to me as a trade secret?+} <span class=\"anchor-reference-id\">(<a
+# | [-href=\"#WhyUseGPL\" >#WhyUseGPL</a>)</span>-]
+# | {+href=\"#TradeSecretRelease2\" >#TradeSecretRelease2</a>)</span>+}
+#, fuzzy
+#| msgid ""
+#| "Why should I use the GNU GPL rather than other free software licenses? "
+#| "<span class=\"anchor-reference-id\">(<a href=\"#WhyUseGPL\" >#WhyUseGPL</"
+#| "a>)</span>"
+msgid ""
+"What if a company distributes a copy of its own GPL-covered work to me as a "
+"trade secret? <span class=\"anchor-reference-id\">(<a href="
+"\"#TradeSecretRelease2\" >#TradeSecretRelease2</a>)</span>"
+msgstr ""
+"ஏனைய கட்டற்ற உரிமங்களை 
காட்டிலும் நான் ஏன் GNU GPLஐ 
பயன்படுத்த வேண்டும்? <span class="
+"\"anchor-reference-id\">(<a href=\"#WhyUseGPL\" >#WhyUseGPL</a>)</span>"
 
 #. type: Content of: <dl><dd><p>
 msgid ""
-"If a company distributes a copy to you and claims it is a trade secret, the "
-"company has violated the GPL and will have to cease distribution.  Note how "
-"this differs from the theft case above; the company does not intentionally "
-"distribute a copy when a copy is stolen, so in that case the company has not "
-"violated the GPL."
+"If the program distributed does not incorporate anyone else's GPL-covered "
+"work, then the company is not violating the GPL (see &ldquo;<a href="
+"\"#DeveloperViolate\">Is the developer of a GPL-covered program bound by the "
+"GPL?</a>&rdquo; for more information). But it is making two contradictory "
+"statements about what you can do with that program: that you can "
+"redistribute it, and that you can't. It would make sense to demand "
+"clarification of the terms for use of that program before you accept a copy."
 msgstr ""
 
 #. type: Content of: <dl><dt>

Index: gpl-faq.zh-cn.po
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/licenses/po/gpl-faq.zh-cn.po,v
retrieving revision 1.7
retrieving revision 1.8
diff -u -b -r1.7 -r1.8
--- gpl-faq.zh-cn.po    8 Jun 2019 15:42:34 -0000       1.7
+++ gpl-faq.zh-cn.po    1 Aug 2019 09:00:42 -0000       1.8
@@ -6,7 +6,7 @@
 msgid ""
 msgstr ""
 "Project-Id-Version: gpl-faq.html\n"
-"POT-Creation-Date: 2019-04-12 15:26+0000\n"
+"POT-Creation-Date: 2019-08-01 08:55+0000\n"
 "PO-Revision-Date: 2019-06-08 21:01+0800\n"
 "Last-Translator: Wensheng Xie <address@hidden>\n"
 "Language-Team: Chinese <address@hidden>\n"
@@ -14,6 +14,7 @@
 "MIME-Version: 1.0\n"
 "Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8\n"
 "Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit\n"
+"X-Outdated-Since: 2019-08-01 08:55+0000\n"
 
 #. type: Content of: <title>
 msgid ""
@@ -779,9 +780,25 @@
 "人再发布该软件?</a>"
 
 #. type: Content of: <ul><li>
+#, fuzzy
+#| msgid ""
+#| "<a href=\"#TradeSecretRelease\">What if a company distributes a copy as a "
+#| "trade secret?</a>"
 msgid ""
-"<a href=\"#TradeSecretRelease\">What if a company distributes a copy as a "
-"trade secret?</a>"
+"<a href=\"#TradeSecretRelease\">What if a company distributes a copy of some "
+"other developers' GPL-covered work to me as a trade secret?</a>"
+msgstr ""
+"<a href=\"#TradeSecretRelease\">如果公司按ç…
§å•†ä¸šç§˜å¯†æ¥å‘布软件拷贝会怎么样?"
+"</a>"
+
+#. type: Content of: <ul><li>
+#, fuzzy
+#| msgid ""
+#| "<a href=\"#TradeSecretRelease\">What if a company distributes a copy as a "
+#| "trade secret?</a>"
+msgid ""
+"<a href=\"#TradeSecretRelease2\">What if a company distributes a copy of its "
+"own GPL-covered work to me as a trade secret?</a>"
 msgstr ""
 "<a href=\"#TradeSecretRelease\">如果公司按ç…
§å•†ä¸šç§˜å¯†æ¥å‘布软件拷贝会怎么样?"
 "</a>"
@@ -4445,27 +4462,63 @@
 "么它就没有违反 GPL。"
 
 #. type: Content of: <dl><dt>
-msgid ""
-"What if a company distributes a copy as a trade secret? <span class=\"anchor-"
-"reference-id\">(<a href=\"#TradeSecretRelease\" >#TradeSecretRelease</a>)</"
-"span>"
+#, fuzzy
+#| msgid ""
+#| "What if a company distributes a copy as a trade secret? <span class="
+#| "\"anchor-reference-id\">(<a href=\"#TradeSecretRelease\" "
+#| ">#TradeSecretRelease</a>)</span>"
+msgid ""
+"What if a company distributes a copy of some other developers' GPL-covered "
+"work to me as a trade secret? <span class=\"anchor-reference-id\">(<a href="
+"\"#TradeSecretRelease\" >#TradeSecretRelease</a>)</span>"
 msgstr ""
 "如果公司按照商业秘密来发布软件拷贝会怎么样?<span 
class=\"anchor-reference-id"
 "\">(<a href=\"#TradeSecretRelease\" >#TradeSecretRelease</a>)</span>"
 
 #. type: Content of: <dl><dd><p>
-msgid ""
-"If a company distributes a copy to you and claims it is a trade secret, the "
-"company has violated the GPL and will have to cease distribution.  Note how "
-"this differs from the theft case above; the company does not intentionally "
-"distribute a copy when a copy is stolen, so in that case the company has not "
-"violated the GPL."
+#, fuzzy
+#| msgid ""
+#| "If a company distributes a copy to you and claims it is a trade secret, "
+#| "the company has violated the GPL and will have to cease distribution.  "
+#| "Note how this differs from the theft case above; the company does not "
+#| "intentionally distribute a copy when a copy is stolen, so in that case "
+#| "the company has not violated the GPL."
+msgid ""
+"The company has violated the GPL and will have to cease distribution of that "
+"program. Note how this differs from the theft case above; the company does "
+"not intentionally distribute a copy when a copy is stolen, so in that case "
+"the company has not violated the GPL."
 msgstr ""
 "如果一个公司发布拷贝并声称这是商业机密,那么该å…
¬å¸è¿åäº† GPL 并且必须停止发"
 
"布。请注意这和上面的盗窃问题不同;软件拷贝遭到盗窃时,å
…¬å¸å¹¶æœªæœ‰æ„å‘布该软"
 "件,因此公司没有违反 GPL。"
 
 #. type: Content of: <dl><dt>
+#, fuzzy
+#| msgid ""
+#| "What if a company distributes a copy as a trade secret? <span class="
+#| "\"anchor-reference-id\">(<a href=\"#TradeSecretRelease\" "
+#| ">#TradeSecretRelease</a>)</span>"
+msgid ""
+"What if a company distributes a copy of its own GPL-covered work to me as a "
+"trade secret? <span class=\"anchor-reference-id\">(<a href="
+"\"#TradeSecretRelease2\" >#TradeSecretRelease2</a>)</span>"
+msgstr ""
+"如果公司按照商业秘密来发布软件拷贝会怎么样?<span 
class=\"anchor-reference-id"
+"\">(<a href=\"#TradeSecretRelease\" >#TradeSecretRelease</a>)</span>"
+
+#. type: Content of: <dl><dd><p>
+msgid ""
+"If the program distributed does not incorporate anyone else's GPL-covered "
+"work, then the company is not violating the GPL (see &ldquo;<a href="
+"\"#DeveloperViolate\">Is the developer of a GPL-covered program bound by the "
+"GPL?</a>&rdquo; for more information). But it is making two contradictory "
+"statements about what you can do with that program: that you can "
+"redistribute it, and that you can't. It would make sense to demand "
+"clarification of the terms for use of that program before you accept a copy."
+msgstr ""
+
+#. type: Content of: <dl><dt>
 msgid ""
 "Why are some GNU libraries released under the ordinary GPL rather than the "
 "Lesser GPL? <span class=\"anchor-reference-id\">(<a href="



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]