[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
www/licenses/po gpl-faq.es.po gpl-faq.fr.po gpl...
From: |
GNUN |
Subject: |
www/licenses/po gpl-faq.es.po gpl-faq.fr.po gpl... |
Date: |
Thu, 1 Aug 2019 05:00:42 -0400 (EDT) |
CVSROOT: /web/www
Module name: www
Changes by: GNUN <gnun> 19/08/01 05:00:42
Modified files:
licenses/po : gpl-faq.es.po gpl-faq.fr.po
gpl-faq.it-diff.html gpl-faq.it.po
gpl-faq.ja-diff.html gpl-faq.ja.po gpl-faq.pot
gpl-faq.ru.po gpl-faq.ta.po gpl-faq.zh-cn.po
Log message:
Automatic update by GNUnited Nations.
CVSWeb URLs:
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/licenses/po/gpl-faq.es.po?cvsroot=www&r1=1.117&r2=1.118
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/licenses/po/gpl-faq.fr.po?cvsroot=www&r1=1.218&r2=1.219
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/licenses/po/gpl-faq.it-diff.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.8&r2=1.9
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/licenses/po/gpl-faq.it.po?cvsroot=www&r1=1.68&r2=1.69
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/licenses/po/gpl-faq.ja-diff.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.18&r2=1.19
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/licenses/po/gpl-faq.ja.po?cvsroot=www&r1=1.94&r2=1.95
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/licenses/po/gpl-faq.pot?cvsroot=www&r1=1.88&r2=1.89
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/licenses/po/gpl-faq.ru.po?cvsroot=www&r1=1.165&r2=1.166
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/licenses/po/gpl-faq.ta.po?cvsroot=www&r1=1.79&r2=1.80
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/licenses/po/gpl-faq.zh-cn.po?cvsroot=www&r1=1.7&r2=1.8
Patches:
Index: gpl-faq.es.po
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/licenses/po/gpl-faq.es.po,v
retrieving revision 1.117
retrieving revision 1.118
diff -u -b -r1.117 -r1.118
--- gpl-faq.es.po 13 Apr 2019 09:00:08 -0000 1.117
+++ gpl-faq.es.po 1 Aug 2019 09:00:41 -0000 1.118
@@ -8,7 +8,7 @@
msgid ""
msgstr ""
"Project-Id-Version: gpl-faq.html\n"
-"POT-Creation-Date: 2019-04-12 15:26+0000\n"
+"POT-Creation-Date: 2019-08-01 08:55+0000\n"
"PO-Revision-Date: 2019-04-13 10:32+0200\n"
"Last-Translator: Javier Fdez. Retenaga <address@hidden>\n"
"Language-Team: Spanish <address@hidden>\n"
@@ -16,6 +16,7 @@
"MIME-Version: 1.0\n"
"Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8\n"
"Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit\n"
+"X-Outdated-Since: 2019-08-01 08:55+0000\n"
"Plural-Forms: nplurals=2; plural=(n!=1);\n"
"X-Generator: Poedit 1.8.11\n"
@@ -880,9 +881,29 @@
"esa versión?</a>"
#. type: Content of: <ul><li>
+# | <a href=\"#TradeSecretRelease\">What if a company distributes a copy {+of
+# | some other developers' GPL-covered work to me+} as a trade secret?</a>
+#, fuzzy
+#| msgid ""
+#| "<a href=\"#TradeSecretRelease\">What if a company distributes a copy as a "
+#| "trade secret?</a>"
msgid ""
-"<a href=\"#TradeSecretRelease\">What if a company distributes a copy as a "
-"trade secret?</a>"
+"<a href=\"#TradeSecretRelease\">What if a company distributes a copy of some "
+"other developers' GPL-covered work to me as a trade secret?</a>"
+msgstr ""
+"<a href=\"#TradeSecretRelease\">¿Qué sucede si una empresa distribuye una "
+"copia como secreto comercial?</a>"
+
+#. type: Content of: <ul><li>
+# | <a href=\"#TradeSecretRelease{+2+}\">What if a company distributes a copy
+# | {+of its own GPL-covered work to me+} as a trade secret?</a>
+#, fuzzy
+#| msgid ""
+#| "<a href=\"#TradeSecretRelease\">What if a company distributes a copy as a "
+#| "trade secret?</a>"
+msgid ""
+"<a href=\"#TradeSecretRelease2\">What if a company distributes a copy of its "
+"own GPL-covered work to me as a trade secret?</a>"
msgstr ""
"<a href=\"#TradeSecretRelease\">¿Qué sucede si una empresa distribuye una "
"copia como secreto comercial?</a>"
@@ -5138,22 +5159,43 @@
"no ha publicado esa versión, no se ha producido tal vulneración."
#. type: Content of: <dl><dt>
-msgid ""
-"What if a company distributes a copy as a trade secret? <span class=\"anchor-"
-"reference-id\">(<a href=\"#TradeSecretRelease\" >#TradeSecretRelease</a>)</"
-"span>"
+# | What if a company distributes a copy {+of some other developers'
+# | GPL-covered work to me+} as a trade secret? <span
+# | class=\"anchor-reference-id\">(<a href=\"#TradeSecretRelease\"
+# | >#TradeSecretRelease</a>)</span>
+#, fuzzy
+#| msgid ""
+#| "What if a company distributes a copy as a trade secret? <span class="
+#| "\"anchor-reference-id\">(<a href=\"#TradeSecretRelease\" "
+#| ">#TradeSecretRelease</a>)</span>"
+msgid ""
+"What if a company distributes a copy of some other developers' GPL-covered "
+"work to me as a trade secret? <span class=\"anchor-reference-id\">(<a href="
+"\"#TradeSecretRelease\" >#TradeSecretRelease</a>)</span>"
msgstr ""
"¿Qué sucede si una empresa distribuye una copia como secreto comercial? "
"<span class=\"anchor-reference-id\">(<a href=\"#TradeSecretRelease\" "
">#TradeSecretRelease</a>)</span>"
#. type: Content of: <dl><dd><p>
-msgid ""
-"If a company distributes a copy to you and claims it is a trade secret, the "
-"company has violated the GPL and will have to cease distribution. Note how "
-"this differs from the theft case above; the company does not intentionally "
-"distribute a copy when a copy is stolen, so in that case the company has not "
-"violated the GPL."
+# | [-If a company distributes a copy to you and claims it is a trade secret,
+# | the-]{+The+} company has violated the GPL and will have to cease
+# | [-distribution.-] {+distribution of that program.+} Note how this differs
+# | from the theft case above; the company does not intentionally distribute a
+# | copy when a copy is stolen, so in that case the company has not violated
+# | the GPL.
+#, fuzzy
+#| msgid ""
+#| "If a company distributes a copy to you and claims it is a trade secret, "
+#| "the company has violated the GPL and will have to cease distribution. "
+#| "Note how this differs from the theft case above; the company does not "
+#| "intentionally distribute a copy when a copy is stolen, so in that case "
+#| "the company has not violated the GPL."
+msgid ""
+"The company has violated the GPL and will have to cease distribution of that "
+"program. Note how this differs from the theft case above; the company does "
+"not intentionally distribute a copy when a copy is stolen, so in that case "
+"the company has not violated the GPL."
msgstr ""
"Si una empresa le facilita a usted una copia y afirma que se trata de un "
"secreto comercial, la empresa estarÃa vulnerando la GPL y tendrÃa que dejar
"
@@ -5162,6 +5204,36 @@
"modo que en tal caso la empresa no vulnera la GPL."
#. type: Content of: <dl><dt>
+# | What if a company distributes a copy {+of its own GPL-covered work to me+}
+# | as a trade secret? <span class=\"anchor-reference-id\">(<a
+# | [-href=\"#TradeSecretRelease\" >#TradeSecretRelease</a>)</span>-]
+# | {+href=\"#TradeSecretRelease2\" >#TradeSecretRelease2</a>)</span>+}
+#, fuzzy
+#| msgid ""
+#| "What if a company distributes a copy as a trade secret? <span class="
+#| "\"anchor-reference-id\">(<a href=\"#TradeSecretRelease\" "
+#| ">#TradeSecretRelease</a>)</span>"
+msgid ""
+"What if a company distributes a copy of its own GPL-covered work to me as a "
+"trade secret? <span class=\"anchor-reference-id\">(<a href="
+"\"#TradeSecretRelease2\" >#TradeSecretRelease2</a>)</span>"
+msgstr ""
+"¿Qué sucede si una empresa distribuye una copia como secreto comercial? "
+"<span class=\"anchor-reference-id\">(<a href=\"#TradeSecretRelease\" "
+">#TradeSecretRelease</a>)</span>"
+
+#. type: Content of: <dl><dd><p>
+msgid ""
+"If the program distributed does not incorporate anyone else's GPL-covered "
+"work, then the company is not violating the GPL (see “<a href="
+"\"#DeveloperViolate\">Is the developer of a GPL-covered program bound by the "
+"GPL?</a>” for more information). But it is making two contradictory "
+"statements about what you can do with that program: that you can "
+"redistribute it, and that you can't. It would make sense to demand "
+"clarification of the terms for use of that program before you accept a copy."
+msgstr ""
+
+#. type: Content of: <dl><dt>
msgid ""
"Why are some GNU libraries released under the ordinary GPL rather than the "
"Lesser GPL? <span class=\"anchor-reference-id\">(<a href="
Index: gpl-faq.fr.po
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/licenses/po/gpl-faq.fr.po,v
retrieving revision 1.218
retrieving revision 1.219
diff -u -b -r1.218 -r1.219
--- gpl-faq.fr.po 12 Apr 2019 16:11:56 -0000 1.218
+++ gpl-faq.fr.po 1 Aug 2019 09:00:41 -0000 1.219
@@ -10,7 +10,7 @@
msgid ""
msgstr ""
"Project-Id-Version: gpl-faq.html\n"
-"POT-Creation-Date: 2019-04-12 15:26+0000\n"
+"POT-Creation-Date: 2019-08-01 08:55+0000\n"
"PO-Revision-Date: 2019-04-12 18:11+0200\n"
"Last-Translator: Thérèse Godefroy <godef.th AT free.fr>\n"
"Language-Team: French <address@hidden>\n"
@@ -18,6 +18,7 @@
"MIME-Version: 1.0\n"
"Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8\n"
"Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit\n"
+"X-Outdated-Since: 2019-08-01 08:55+0000\n"
"Plural-Forms: \n"
"X-Generator: Gtranslator 2.91.5\n"
@@ -892,9 +893,29 @@
"version ?</a>"
#. type: Content of: <ul><li>
+# | <a href=\"#TradeSecretRelease\">What if a company distributes a copy {+of
+# | some other developers' GPL-covered work to me+} as a trade secret?</a>
+#, fuzzy
+#| msgid ""
+#| "<a href=\"#TradeSecretRelease\">What if a company distributes a copy as a "
+#| "trade secret?</a>"
msgid ""
-"<a href=\"#TradeSecretRelease\">What if a company distributes a copy as a "
-"trade secret?</a>"
+"<a href=\"#TradeSecretRelease\">What if a company distributes a copy of some "
+"other developers' GPL-covered work to me as a trade secret?</a>"
+msgstr ""
+"<a href=\"#TradeSecretRelease\">Et si une société distribuait une copie
sous "
+"couvert du secret industriel ?</a>"
+
+#. type: Content of: <ul><li>
+# | <a href=\"#TradeSecretRelease{+2+}\">What if a company distributes a copy
+# | {+of its own GPL-covered work to me+} as a trade secret?</a>
+#, fuzzy
+#| msgid ""
+#| "<a href=\"#TradeSecretRelease\">What if a company distributes a copy as a "
+#| "trade secret?</a>"
+msgid ""
+"<a href=\"#TradeSecretRelease2\">What if a company distributes a copy of its "
+"own GPL-covered work to me as a trade secret?</a>"
msgstr ""
"<a href=\"#TradeSecretRelease\">Et si une société distribuait une copie
sous "
"couvert du secret industriel ?</a>"
@@ -5160,22 +5181,43 @@
"si la société n'a pas publié cette version, il n'y a pas eu violation."
#. type: Content of: <dl><dt>
-msgid ""
-"What if a company distributes a copy as a trade secret? <span class=\"anchor-"
-"reference-id\">(<a href=\"#TradeSecretRelease\" >#TradeSecretRelease</a>)</"
-"span>"
+# | What if a company distributes a copy {+of some other developers'
+# | GPL-covered work to me+} as a trade secret? <span
+# | class=\"anchor-reference-id\">(<a href=\"#TradeSecretRelease\"
+# | >#TradeSecretRelease</a>)</span>
+#, fuzzy
+#| msgid ""
+#| "What if a company distributes a copy as a trade secret? <span class="
+#| "\"anchor-reference-id\">(<a href=\"#TradeSecretRelease\" "
+#| ">#TradeSecretRelease</a>)</span>"
+msgid ""
+"What if a company distributes a copy of some other developers' GPL-covered "
+"work to me as a trade secret? <span class=\"anchor-reference-id\">(<a href="
+"\"#TradeSecretRelease\" >#TradeSecretRelease</a>)</span>"
msgstr ""
"Et si une société distribuait une copie sous couvert du secret industrielÂ
? "
"<span class=\"anchor-reference-id\">(<a href=\"#TradeSecretRelease\" "
">#TradeSecretRelease</a>)</span>"
#. type: Content of: <dl><dd><p>
-msgid ""
-"If a company distributes a copy to you and claims it is a trade secret, the "
-"company has violated the GPL and will have to cease distribution. Note how "
-"this differs from the theft case above; the company does not intentionally "
-"distribute a copy when a copy is stolen, so in that case the company has not "
-"violated the GPL."
+# | [-If a company distributes a copy to you and claims it is a trade secret,
+# | the-]{+The+} company has violated the GPL and will have to cease
+# | [-distribution.-] {+distribution of that program.+} Note how this differs
+# | from the theft case above; the company does not intentionally distribute a
+# | copy when a copy is stolen, so in that case the company has not violated
+# | the GPL.
+#, fuzzy
+#| msgid ""
+#| "If a company distributes a copy to you and claims it is a trade secret, "
+#| "the company has violated the GPL and will have to cease distribution. "
+#| "Note how this differs from the theft case above; the company does not "
+#| "intentionally distribute a copy when a copy is stolen, so in that case "
+#| "the company has not violated the GPL."
+msgid ""
+"The company has violated the GPL and will have to cease distribution of that "
+"program. Note how this differs from the theft case above; the company does "
+"not intentionally distribute a copy when a copy is stolen, so in that case "
+"the company has not violated the GPL."
msgstr ""
"Si la société vous a distribué une copie en invoquant le secret
industriel, "
"la société a violé la GPL et doit cesser la distribution. Notez comme cela
"
@@ -5184,6 +5226,36 @@
"GPL."
#. type: Content of: <dl><dt>
+# | What if a company distributes a copy {+of its own GPL-covered work to me+}
+# | as a trade secret? <span class=\"anchor-reference-id\">(<a
+# | [-href=\"#TradeSecretRelease\" >#TradeSecretRelease</a>)</span>-]
+# | {+href=\"#TradeSecretRelease2\" >#TradeSecretRelease2</a>)</span>+}
+#, fuzzy
+#| msgid ""
+#| "What if a company distributes a copy as a trade secret? <span class="
+#| "\"anchor-reference-id\">(<a href=\"#TradeSecretRelease\" "
+#| ">#TradeSecretRelease</a>)</span>"
+msgid ""
+"What if a company distributes a copy of its own GPL-covered work to me as a "
+"trade secret? <span class=\"anchor-reference-id\">(<a href="
+"\"#TradeSecretRelease2\" >#TradeSecretRelease2</a>)</span>"
+msgstr ""
+"Et si une société distribuait une copie sous couvert du secret industrielÂ
? "
+"<span class=\"anchor-reference-id\">(<a href=\"#TradeSecretRelease\" "
+">#TradeSecretRelease</a>)</span>"
+
+#. type: Content of: <dl><dd><p>
+msgid ""
+"If the program distributed does not incorporate anyone else's GPL-covered "
+"work, then the company is not violating the GPL (see “<a href="
+"\"#DeveloperViolate\">Is the developer of a GPL-covered program bound by the "
+"GPL?</a>” for more information). But it is making two contradictory "
+"statements about what you can do with that program: that you can "
+"redistribute it, and that you can't. It would make sense to demand "
+"clarification of the terms for use of that program before you accept a copy."
+msgstr ""
+
+#. type: Content of: <dl><dt>
msgid ""
"Why are some GNU libraries released under the ordinary GPL rather than the "
"Lesser GPL? <span class=\"anchor-reference-id\">(<a href="
Index: gpl-faq.it-diff.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/licenses/po/gpl-faq.it-diff.html,v
retrieving revision 1.8
retrieving revision 1.9
diff -u -b -r1.8 -r1.9
--- gpl-faq.it-diff.html 12 Apr 2019 15:31:23 -0000 1.8
+++ gpl-faq.it-diff.html 1 Aug 2019 09:00:41 -0000 1.9
@@ -448,7 +448,11 @@
redistribute that version?</a></li>
<li><a href="#TradeSecretRelease">What if a company
distributes a
- copy as a trade secret?</a></li>
+ copy <span class="inserted"><ins><em>of some other developers' GPL-covered
work to me as a trade
+ secret?</a></li>
+
+ <li><a href="#TradeSecretRelease2">What if a company
distributes a
+ copy of its own GPL-covered work to me</em></ins></span> as a trade
secret?</a></li>
<li><a href="#GPLFairUse">Do I have “fair use”
rights in
using the source code of a GPL-covered program?</a></li>
@@ -2494,19 +2498,37 @@
hasn't released this version, no such violation has
occurred.</p></dd>
-<dt id="TradeSecretRelease">What if a company distributes a copy as
- a trade secret?
+<dt id="TradeSecretRelease">What if a company distributes a copy <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>of
+ some other developers' GPL-covered work to me</em></ins></span> as a trade
secret?
<span class="anchor-reference-id">(<a href="#TradeSecretRelease"
>#TradeSecretRelease</a>)</span></dt>
<dd><p>
-If a company distributes a copy to you and claims it is a trade
-secret, the company has violated the GPL and will have to cease
-distribution. Note how this differs from the theft case above; the
+<span class="removed"><del><strong>If a company distributes a copy to you and
claims it is a trade
+secret, the</strong></del></span>
+<span class="inserted"><ins><em>The</em></ins></span> company has violated the
GPL and will have to cease
+<span class="removed"><del><strong>distribution.</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>distribution
+of that program.</em></ins></span> Note how this differs from the theft case
above; the
company does not intentionally distribute a copy when a copy is
stolen, so in that case the company has not violated the
GPL.</p></dd>
-<dt id="WhySomeGPLAndNotLGPL">Why are some GNU libraries released under
+<dt <span class="inserted"><ins><em>id="TradeSecretRelease2">What if a
company distributes a copy
+ of its own GPL-covered work to me as a trade secret?
+ <span class="anchor-reference-id">(<a href="#TradeSecretRelease2"
+ >#TradeSecretRelease2</a>)</span></dt>
+
+<dd><p>
+If the program distributed does not incorporate anyone else's
+GPL-covered work, then the company is not violating the GPL (see
+“<a href="#DeveloperViolate">Is the developer of a GPL-covered
+program bound by the GPL?</a>” for more information). But it is
+making two contradictory statements about what you can do with that
+program: that you can redistribute it, and that you can't. It would
+make sense to demand clarification of the terms for use of that program
+before you accept a copy.</p></dd>
+
+
+<dt</em></ins></span> id="WhySomeGPLAndNotLGPL">Why are some GNU
libraries released under
the ordinary GPL rather than the Lesser GPL?
<span class="anchor-reference-id">(<a href="#WhySomeGPLAndNotLGPL"
>#WhySomeGPLAndNotLGPL</a>)</span></dt>
@@ -3959,7 +3981,7 @@
<p class="unprintable">Updated:
<!-- timestamp start -->
-$Date: 2019/04/12 15:31:23 $
+$Date: 2019/08/01 09:00:41 $
<!-- timestamp end -->
</p>
</div>
Index: gpl-faq.it.po
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/licenses/po/gpl-faq.it.po,v
retrieving revision 1.68
retrieving revision 1.69
diff -u -b -r1.68 -r1.69
--- gpl-faq.it.po 12 Apr 2019 15:31:23 -0000 1.68
+++ gpl-faq.it.po 1 Aug 2019 09:00:41 -0000 1.69
@@ -11,7 +11,7 @@
msgid ""
msgstr ""
"Project-Id-Version: gpl-faq.html\n"
-"POT-Creation-Date: 2019-04-12 15:26+0000\n"
+"POT-Creation-Date: 2019-08-01 08:55+0000\n"
"PO-Revision-Date: 2018-11-19 17:42+0100\n"
"Last-Translator: Andrea Pescetti <address@hidden>\n"
"Language-Team: Italian <address@hidden>\n"
@@ -916,9 +916,29 @@
"quella versione?</a>"
#. type: Content of: <ul><li>
+# | <a href=\"#TradeSecretRelease\">What if a company distributes a copy {+of
+# | some other developers' GPL-covered work to me+} as a trade secret?</a>
+#, fuzzy
+#| msgid ""
+#| "<a href=\"#TradeSecretRelease\">What if a company distributes a copy as a "
+#| "trade secret?</a>"
msgid ""
-"<a href=\"#TradeSecretRelease\">What if a company distributes a copy as a "
-"trade secret?</a>"
+"<a href=\"#TradeSecretRelease\">What if a company distributes a copy of some "
+"other developers' GPL-covered work to me as a trade secret?</a>"
+msgstr ""
+"<a href=\"#TradeSecretRelease\">E se una società distribuisse una copia come
"
+"segreto industriale?</a>"
+
+#. type: Content of: <ul><li>
+# | <a href=\"#TradeSecretRelease{+2+}\">What if a company distributes a copy
+# | {+of its own GPL-covered work to me+} as a trade secret?</a>
+#, fuzzy
+#| msgid ""
+#| "<a href=\"#TradeSecretRelease\">What if a company distributes a copy as a "
+#| "trade secret?</a>"
+msgid ""
+"<a href=\"#TradeSecretRelease2\">What if a company distributes a copy of its "
+"own GPL-covered work to me as a trade secret?</a>"
msgstr ""
"<a href=\"#TradeSecretRelease\">E se una società distribuisse una copia come
"
"segreto industriale?</a>"
@@ -5331,22 +5351,43 @@
"avvenuta alcuna violazione di questo genere."
#. type: Content of: <dl><dt>
-msgid ""
-"What if a company distributes a copy as a trade secret? <span class=\"anchor-"
-"reference-id\">(<a href=\"#TradeSecretRelease\" >#TradeSecretRelease</a>)</"
-"span>"
+# | What if a company distributes a copy {+of some other developers'
+# | GPL-covered work to me+} as a trade secret? <span
+# | class=\"anchor-reference-id\">(<a href=\"#TradeSecretRelease\"
+# | >#TradeSecretRelease</a>)</span>
+#, fuzzy
+#| msgid ""
+#| "What if a company distributes a copy as a trade secret? <span class="
+#| "\"anchor-reference-id\">(<a href=\"#TradeSecretRelease\" "
+#| ">#TradeSecretRelease</a>)</span>"
+msgid ""
+"What if a company distributes a copy of some other developers' GPL-covered "
+"work to me as a trade secret? <span class=\"anchor-reference-id\">(<a href="
+"\"#TradeSecretRelease\" >#TradeSecretRelease</a>)</span>"
msgstr ""
"E se una società distribuisse una copia come segreto industriale? <span "
"class=\"anchor-reference-id\">(<a href=\"#TradeSecretRelease\" "
">#TradeSecretRelease</a>)</span>"
#. type: Content of: <dl><dd><p>
-msgid ""
-"If a company distributes a copy to you and claims it is a trade secret, the "
-"company has violated the GPL and will have to cease distribution. Note how "
-"this differs from the theft case above; the company does not intentionally "
-"distribute a copy when a copy is stolen, so in that case the company has not "
-"violated the GPL."
+# | [-If a company distributes a copy to you and claims it is a trade secret,
+# | the-]{+The+} company has violated the GPL and will have to cease
+# | [-distribution.-] {+distribution of that program.+} Note how this differs
+# | from the theft case above; the company does not intentionally distribute a
+# | copy when a copy is stolen, so in that case the company has not violated
+# | the GPL.
+#, fuzzy
+#| msgid ""
+#| "If a company distributes a copy to you and claims it is a trade secret, "
+#| "the company has violated the GPL and will have to cease distribution. "
+#| "Note how this differs from the theft case above; the company does not "
+#| "intentionally distribute a copy when a copy is stolen, so in that case "
+#| "the company has not violated the GPL."
+msgid ""
+"The company has violated the GPL and will have to cease distribution of that "
+"program. Note how this differs from the theft case above; the company does "
+"not intentionally distribute a copy when a copy is stolen, so in that case "
+"the company has not violated the GPL."
msgstr ""
"Se la società distribuisce a qualcuno una copia sostenendo che sia segreto "
"industriale, la società sta violando la GPL e dovrà cessare la "
@@ -5356,6 +5397,36 @@
"la GPL."
#. type: Content of: <dl><dt>
+# | What if a company distributes a copy {+of its own GPL-covered work to me+}
+# | as a trade secret? <span class=\"anchor-reference-id\">(<a
+# | [-href=\"#TradeSecretRelease\" >#TradeSecretRelease</a>)</span>-]
+# | {+href=\"#TradeSecretRelease2\" >#TradeSecretRelease2</a>)</span>+}
+#, fuzzy
+#| msgid ""
+#| "What if a company distributes a copy as a trade secret? <span class="
+#| "\"anchor-reference-id\">(<a href=\"#TradeSecretRelease\" "
+#| ">#TradeSecretRelease</a>)</span>"
+msgid ""
+"What if a company distributes a copy of its own GPL-covered work to me as a "
+"trade secret? <span class=\"anchor-reference-id\">(<a href="
+"\"#TradeSecretRelease2\" >#TradeSecretRelease2</a>)</span>"
+msgstr ""
+"E se una società distribuisse una copia come segreto industriale? <span "
+"class=\"anchor-reference-id\">(<a href=\"#TradeSecretRelease\" "
+">#TradeSecretRelease</a>)</span>"
+
+#. type: Content of: <dl><dd><p>
+msgid ""
+"If the program distributed does not incorporate anyone else's GPL-covered "
+"work, then the company is not violating the GPL (see “<a href="
+"\"#DeveloperViolate\">Is the developer of a GPL-covered program bound by the "
+"GPL?</a>” for more information). But it is making two contradictory "
+"statements about what you can do with that program: that you can "
+"redistribute it, and that you can't. It would make sense to demand "
+"clarification of the terms for use of that program before you accept a copy."
+msgstr ""
+
+#. type: Content of: <dl><dt>
msgid ""
"Why are some GNU libraries released under the ordinary GPL rather than the "
"Lesser GPL? <span class=\"anchor-reference-id\">(<a href="
Index: gpl-faq.ja-diff.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/licenses/po/gpl-faq.ja-diff.html,v
retrieving revision 1.18
retrieving revision 1.19
diff -u -b -r1.18 -r1.19
--- gpl-faq.ja-diff.html 26 Jun 2019 20:32:16 -0000 1.18
+++ gpl-faq.ja-diff.html 1 Aug 2019 09:00:41 -0000 1.19
@@ -448,7 +448,11 @@
redistribute that version?</a></li>
<li><a href="#TradeSecretRelease">What if a company
distributes a
- copy as a trade secret?</a></li>
+ copy <span class="inserted"><ins><em>of some other developers' GPL-covered
work to me as a trade
+ secret?</a></li>
+
+ <li><a href="#TradeSecretRelease2">What if a company
distributes a
+ copy of its own GPL-covered work to me</em></ins></span> as a trade
secret?</a></li>
<li><a href="#GPLFairUse">Do I have “fair use”
rights in
using the source code of a GPL-covered program?</a></li>
@@ -1697,19 +1701,24 @@
<span class="anchor-reference-id">(<a href="#IfLibraryIsGPL"
>#IfLibraryIsGPL</a>)</span></dt>
<dd><p>
-Yes, because the <span class="inserted"><ins><em>program actually links to the
library. As such,
-the terms of the GPL apply to the entire combination. The</em></ins></span>
software <span class="inserted"><ins><em>modules
+Yes, because the <span class="removed"><del><strong>software as it
is</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>program</em></ins></span> actually <span
class="removed"><del><strong>run includes</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>links to</em></ins></span> the
+<span class="removed"><del><strong>library.</p></dd>
+
+
+<dt id="IfInterpreterIsGPL">If a programming language interpreter
+ is released under</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>library. As such,</em></ins></span>
+the <span class="removed"><del><strong>GPL, does that mean programs
written</strong></del></span> <span class="inserted"><ins><em>terms of the GPL
apply</em></ins></span> to <span class="removed"><del><strong>be
+ interpreted</strong></del></span> <span class="inserted"><ins><em>the
entire combination. The software modules
that link with the library may be under various GPL compatible licenses, but
the
-work</em></ins></span> as <span class="inserted"><ins><em>a whole must be
licensed under the GPL. See also:
-<a href="#WhatDoesCompatMean">What does</em></ins></span> it <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>mean to say a license</em></ins></span> is <span
class="removed"><del><strong>actually run includes</strong></del></span>
-<span class="inserted"><ins><em>“compatible with</em></ins></span> the
-<span
class="removed"><del><strong>library.</p></dd></strong></del></span>
<span class="inserted"><ins><em>GPL”?</a>
-</p></dd></em></ins></span>
+work as a whole must be licensed under the GPL. See also:
+<a href="#WhatDoesCompatMean">What does it mean to say a license is
+“compatible with the GPL”?</a>
+</p></dd>
<dt id="IfInterpreterIsGPL">If a programming language interpreter
is released under the GPL, does that mean programs written to be
- interpreted by it must be under GPL-compatible licenses?
+ interpreted</em></ins></span> by it must be under GPL-compatible licenses?
<span class="anchor-reference-id">(<a href="#IfInterpreterIsGPL"
>#IfInterpreterIsGPL</a>)</span></dt>
<dd><p>
@@ -1839,12 +1848,12 @@
>#GPLPluginsInNF</a>)</span></dt></strong></del></span>
<span class="inserted"><ins><em>href="#GPLAndPlugins"
>#GPLAndPlugins</a>)</span></dt></em></ins></span>
<dd><p>
-<span class="inserted"><ins><em>Please see this question <a
href="#GPLPlugins">for determining when
-plug-ins and a main program are considered a single combined program
-and when they are considered separate works</a>.</p>
+<span class="removed"><del><strong>If the program uses fork and exec to invoke
plug-ins, then the</strong></del></span>
+<span class="inserted"><ins><em>Please see this question <a
href="#GPLPlugins">for determining when</em></ins></span>
+plug-ins <span class="inserted"><ins><em>and a main program are considered a
single combined program
+and when they</em></ins></span> are <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>considered</em></ins></span> separate <span
class="removed"><del><strong>programs, so</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>works</a>.</p>
-<p></em></ins></span> If the <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>main</em></ins></span> program <span
class="removed"><del><strong>uses fork</strong></del></span> and <span
class="removed"><del><strong>exec to invoke plug-ins,
then</strong></del></span> the
-<span class="removed"><del><strong>plug-ins</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>plugins</em></ins></span> are <span
class="removed"><del><strong>separate programs, so the</strong></del></span>
<span class="inserted"><ins><em>a single combined program then this means
+<p> If</em></ins></span> the <span class="inserted"><ins><em>main
program and the plugins are a single combined program then this means
you must</em></ins></span> license <span
class="removed"><del><strong>for</strong></del></span> the <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>plug-in under the GPL or a GPL-compatible free
software license and distribute it with source code in a GPL-compliant
way. A</em></ins></span> main program <span class="inserted"><ins><em>that is
separate from its plug-ins</em></ins></span> makes no
@@ -1857,9 +1866,9 @@
>#GPLPluginsInNF</a>)</span></dt>
<dd><p>
Please see this question <a href="#GPLPlugins">for determining when
-plug-ins</em></ins></span> and <span class="removed"><del><strong>there are no
special requirements.</p>
+plug-ins</em></ins></span> and <span
class="removed"><del><strong>there</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>a main program</em></ins></span> are <span
class="removed"><del><strong>no special requirements.</p>
-<p>If the</strong></del></span> <span class="inserted"><ins><em>a main
program are considered a single combined</em></ins></span> program <span
class="removed"><del><strong>dynamically links plug-ins,</strong></del></span>
+<p>If the</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>considered a single combined</em></ins></span>
program <span class="removed"><del><strong>dynamically links
plug-ins,</strong></del></span>
and <span class="inserted"><ins><em>when</em></ins></span> they <span
class="removed"><del><strong>make function
calls to each other and share data structures, we
believe</strong></del></span> <span class="inserted"><ins><em>are considered
separate programs</a>.</p>
<p> If</em></ins></span> they form a
@@ -1894,12 +1903,12 @@
If</em></ins></span> they form a single <span
class="removed"><del><strong>program, which must be treated as an extension of
both the main</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>combined</em></ins></span> program <span
class="removed"><del><strong>and the plug-ins. In order to use the GPL-covered
plug-ins,</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>then</em></ins></span> the
main program must be released under the GPL or a GPL-compatible free
software license, and <span
class="removed"><del><strong>that</strong></del></span> the terms of the GPL
must be followed when
-the main program is distributed for use with these plug-ins.</p>
+the main program is <span class="removed"><del><strong>distributed for use
with these plug-ins.</p>
-<span class="removed"><del><strong><p>If the program dynamically links
plug-ins, but the communication
-between them is limited to invoking</strong></del></span>
+<p>If the program dynamically links plug-ins, but the communication
+between them is limited to invoking</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>distributed for use with these plug-ins.</p>
-<span class="inserted"><ins><em><p>However, if they are separate works
then</em></ins></span> the <span
class="removed"><del><strong>‘main’ function</strong></del></span>
<span class="inserted"><ins><em>license</em></ins></span> of the plug-in <span
class="removed"><del><strong>with some options and waiting for it to return,
that is a
+<p>However, if they are separate works then</em></ins></span> the <span
class="removed"><del><strong>‘main’ function</strong></del></span>
<span class="inserted"><ins><em>license</em></ins></span> of the plug-in <span
class="removed"><del><strong>with some options and waiting for it to return,
that is a
borderline case.</p>
<p>Using shared memory to communicate with complex data structures
@@ -2053,20 +2062,19 @@
So when they are used for communication, the modules normally are
separate programs. But if the semantics of the communication are
intimate enough, exchanging complex internal data structures, that too
-could be a basis to consider the <span class="removed"><del><strong>two parts
as combined into</strong></del></span> <span class="inserted"><ins><em>two
parts as combined into a larger
+could be a basis to consider the two parts as combined into a larger
program.</p></dd>
-<dt id="AggregateContainers">When it comes to determining
+<dt <span class="inserted"><ins><em>id="AggregateContainers">When it
comes to determining
whether two pieces of software form a single work, does the fact
that the code is in one or more containers have any effect?
<span class="anchor-reference-id">(<a href="#AggregateContainers"
>#AggregateContainers</a>)</span></dt>
-<dd><p>No, the analysis of whether they are</em></ins></span> a
<span class="removed"><del><strong>larger
-program.</p></dd></strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em><a
+<dd><p>No, the analysis of whether they are a <a
href="#MereAggregation">single work or an
-aggregate</a> is unchanged by the involvement of
containers.</p></dd></em></ins></span>
+aggregate</a> is unchanged by the involvement of
containers.</p></dd>
-<dt id="AssignCopyright">Why does
+<dt</em></ins></span> id="AssignCopyright">Why does
the FSF require that contributors to FSF-copyrighted programs assign
copyright to the FSF? If I hold copyright on a <span
class="removed"><del><strong>GPL'ed</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>GPLed</em></ins></span> program, should
I do this, too? If so, how?
@@ -2470,36 +2478,38 @@
>#UnreleasedMods</a>)</span></dt>
<dd><p>
The GPL permits anyone to make a modified version and use it without
-ever distributing it to others. What this company is doing is a special
+ever distributing it to <span
class="removed"><del><strong>others.</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>others. What this company is doing is a special
case of that. Therefore, the company does not have to release the
-modified <span class="removed"><del><strong>sources.</p>
-
-<p>It</strong></del></span> <span class="inserted"><ins><em>sources. The
situation</em></ins></span> is <span class="removed"><del><strong>essential for
people</strong></del></span> <span class="inserted"><ins><em>different when the
modified program
+modified sources. The situation is different when the modified program
is licensed under the terms of the <a
href="#UnreleasedModsAGPL">GNU Affero GPL</a>.</p>
-<p>Compare this</em></ins></span> to <span
class="removed"><del><strong>have</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>a situation where</em></ins></span> the <span
class="removed"><del><strong>freedom</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>web site contains or links</em></ins></span> to <span
class="removed"><del><strong>make modifications and
-use them privately, without ever publishing those modifications. However,
-putting</strong></del></span>
-<span class="inserted"><ins><em>separate GPLed programs that are distributed
to the user when they
+<p>Compare this to a situation where the web site contains or links to
+separate GPLed programs that are distributed to the user when they
visit the web site (often written in <a
href="/philosophy/javascript-trap.html">JavaScript</a>, but other
languages are used as well). In this situation the source code for the
programs being distributed must be released to the user under the
-terms of</em></ins></span> the <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>GPL.</p></dd>
+terms of the GPL.</p></dd>
<dt id="UnreleasedModsAGPL">A company is running a modified
- version of a</em></ins></span> program <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>licensed under the GNU Affero GPL
(AGPL)</em></ins></span> on a <span class="removed"><del><strong>server machine
for</strong></del></span>
- <span class="inserted"><ins><em>web site. Does</em></ins></span> the <span
class="removed"><del><strong>public to talk</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>AGPL say they must release their modified
+ version of a program licensed under the GNU Affero GPL (AGPL) on a
+ web site. Does the AGPL say they must release their modified
sources?
<span class="anchor-reference-id">(<a href="#UnreleasedModsAGPL"
>#UnreleasedModsAGPL</a>)</span></dt>
<dd><p>The <a href="/licenses/agpl.html">GNU Affero
GPL</a>
requires that modified versions of the software offer all users
-interacting with it over a computer network an opportunity</em></ins></span>
to <span class="inserted"><ins><em>receive
-the source. What the company</em></ins></span> is <span
class="removed"><del><strong>hardly
-“private” use,</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>doing falls under that meaning,</em></ins></span> so
<span class="removed"><del><strong>it would be legitimate to
require</strong></del></span> <span class="inserted"><ins><em>the
-company must</em></ins></span> release <span
class="removed"><del><strong>of</strong></del></span> the <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>modified</em></ins></span> source <span
class="removed"><del><strong>code in that special case. Developers who wish to
address this
+interacting with it over a computer network an opportunity to receive
+the source.</em></ins></span> What <span
class="removed"><del><strong>this</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>the</em></ins></span> company is doing <span
class="removed"><del><strong>is a
+special case of that. Therefore,</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>falls under that meaning, so</em></ins></span> the
+company <span class="removed"><del><strong>does not have
to</strong></del></span> <span class="inserted"><ins><em>must</em></ins></span>
release the modified <span class="removed"><del><strong>sources.</p>
+
+<p>It is essential for people to have the freedom to make modifications
and
+use them privately, without ever publishing those modifications. However,
+putting the program on a server machine for the public to talk to is hardly
+“private” use, so it would be legitimate to require release of
+the</strong></del></span> source <span class="removed"><del><strong>code in
that special case. Developers who wish to address this
might want to use the
<a href="/licenses/agpl.html">GNU Affero GPL</a> for
programs
designed for network server use.</p></dd></strong></del></span>
<span class="inserted"><ins><em>code.</p></dd></em></ins></span>
@@ -2539,19 +2549,37 @@
hasn't released this version, no such violation has
occurred.</p></dd>
-<dt id="TradeSecretRelease">What if a company distributes a copy as
- a trade secret?
+<dt id="TradeSecretRelease">What if a company distributes a copy <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>of
+ some other developers' GPL-covered work to me</em></ins></span> as a trade
secret?
<span class="anchor-reference-id">(<a href="#TradeSecretRelease"
>#TradeSecretRelease</a>)</span></dt>
<dd><p>
-If a company distributes a copy to you and claims it is a trade
-secret, the company has violated the GPL and will have to cease
-distribution. Note how this differs from the theft case above; the
+<span class="removed"><del><strong>If a company distributes a copy to you and
claims it is a trade
+secret, the</strong></del></span>
+<span class="inserted"><ins><em>The</em></ins></span> company has violated the
GPL and will have to cease
+<span class="removed"><del><strong>distribution.</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>distribution
+of that program.</em></ins></span> Note how this differs from the theft case
above; the
company does not intentionally distribute a copy when a copy is
stolen, so in that case the company has not violated the
GPL.</p></dd>
-<dt id="WhySomeGPLAndNotLGPL">Why are some GNU libraries released under
+<dt <span class="inserted"><ins><em>id="TradeSecretRelease2">What if a
company distributes a copy
+ of its own GPL-covered work to me as a trade secret?
+ <span class="anchor-reference-id">(<a href="#TradeSecretRelease2"
+ >#TradeSecretRelease2</a>)</span></dt>
+
+<dd><p>
+If the program distributed does not incorporate anyone else's
+GPL-covered work, then the company is not violating the GPL (see
+“<a href="#DeveloperViolate">Is the developer of a GPL-covered
+program bound by the GPL?</a>” for more information). But it is
+making two contradictory statements about what you can do with that
+program: that you can redistribute it, and that you can't. It would
+make sense to demand clarification of the terms for use of that program
+before you accept a copy.</p></dd>
+
+
+<dt</em></ins></span> id="WhySomeGPLAndNotLGPL">Why are some GNU
libraries released under
the ordinary GPL rather than the Lesser GPL?
<span class="anchor-reference-id">(<a href="#WhySomeGPLAndNotLGPL"
>#WhySomeGPLAndNotLGPL</a>)</span></dt>
@@ -4005,7 +4033,7 @@
<p class="unprintable">Updated:
<!-- timestamp start -->
-$Date: 2019/06/26 20:32:16 $
+$Date: 2019/08/01 09:00:41 $
<!-- timestamp end -->
</p>
</div>
Index: gpl-faq.ja.po
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/licenses/po/gpl-faq.ja.po,v
retrieving revision 1.94
retrieving revision 1.95
diff -u -b -r1.94 -r1.95
--- gpl-faq.ja.po 12 Apr 2019 15:31:23 -0000 1.94
+++ gpl-faq.ja.po 1 Aug 2019 09:00:42 -0000 1.95
@@ -6,7 +6,7 @@
msgid ""
msgstr ""
"Project-Id-Version: gpl-faq.html\n"
-"POT-Creation-Date: 2019-04-12 15:26+0000\n"
+"POT-Creation-Date: 2019-08-01 08:55+0000\n"
"PO-Revision-Date: 2017-01-11 09:42+0900\n"
"Last-Translator: NIIBE Yutaka <address@hidden>\n"
"Language-Team: Japanese <address@hidden>\n"
@@ -901,9 +901,25 @@
"ã¾ãããGPLã¯ããã«ãã®ãã¼ã¸ã§ã³ãåé
å¸ãã権å©ãä¸ãã¾ãã?</a>"
#. type: Content of: <ul><li>
+#, fuzzy
+#| msgid ""
+#| "<a href=\"#TradeSecretRelease\">What if a company distributes a copy as a "
+#| "trade secret?</a>"
msgid ""
-"<a href=\"#TradeSecretRelease\">What if a company distributes a copy as a "
-"trade secret?</a>"
+"<a href=\"#TradeSecretRelease\">What if a company distributes a copy of some "
+"other developers' GPL-covered work to me as a trade secret?</a>"
+msgstr ""
+"<a
href=\"#TradeSecretRelease\">ããä¼ç¤¾ãããã³ãã¼ããã¬ã¼ãã»ã·ã¼ã¯ã¬ãã"
+"ã¨ãã¦é
å¸ãããã©ãã§ãã?</a>"
+
+#. type: Content of: <ul><li>
+#, fuzzy
+#| msgid ""
+#| "<a href=\"#TradeSecretRelease\">What if a company distributes a copy as a "
+#| "trade secret?</a>"
+msgid ""
+"<a href=\"#TradeSecretRelease2\">What if a company distributes a copy of its "
+"own GPL-covered work to me as a trade secret?</a>"
msgstr ""
"<a
href=\"#TradeSecretRelease\">ããä¼ç¤¾ãããã³ãã¼ããã¬ã¼ãã»ã·ã¼ã¯ã¬ãã"
"ã¨ãã¦é
å¸ãããã©ãã§ãã?</a>"
@@ -5340,22 +5356,33 @@
"ãã®ãããªéåã¯èµ·ããã¾ããã"
#. type: Content of: <dl><dt>
-msgid ""
-"What if a company distributes a copy as a trade secret? <span class=\"anchor-"
-"reference-id\">(<a href=\"#TradeSecretRelease\" >#TradeSecretRelease</a>)</"
-"span>"
+#, fuzzy
+#| msgid ""
+#| "What if a company distributes a copy as a trade secret? <span class="
+#| "\"anchor-reference-id\">(<a href=\"#TradeSecretRelease\" "
+#| ">#TradeSecretRelease</a>)</span>"
+msgid ""
+"What if a company distributes a copy of some other developers' GPL-covered "
+"work to me as a trade secret? <span class=\"anchor-reference-id\">(<a href="
+"\"#TradeSecretRelease\" >#TradeSecretRelease</a>)</span>"
msgstr ""
"ããä¼ç¤¾ãããã³ãã¼ããã¬ã¼ãã»ã·ã¼ã¯ã¬ããã¨ãã¦é
å¸ãããã©ãã§ãã? "
"<span class=\"anchor-reference-id\">(<a href=\"#TradeSecretRelease\" "
">#TradeSecretRelease</a>)</span>"
#. type: Content of: <dl><dd><p>
-msgid ""
-"If a company distributes a copy to you and claims it is a trade secret, the "
-"company has violated the GPL and will have to cease distribution. Note how "
-"this differs from the theft case above; the company does not intentionally "
-"distribute a copy when a copy is stolen, so in that case the company has not "
-"violated the GPL."
+#, fuzzy
+#| msgid ""
+#| "If a company distributes a copy to you and claims it is a trade secret, "
+#| "the company has violated the GPL and will have to cease distribution. "
+#| "Note how this differs from the theft case above; the company does not "
+#| "intentionally distribute a copy when a copy is stolen, so in that case "
+#| "the company has not violated the GPL."
+msgid ""
+"The company has violated the GPL and will have to cease distribution of that "
+"program. Note how this differs from the theft case above; the company does "
+"not intentionally distribute a copy when a copy is stolen, so in that case "
+"the company has not violated the GPL."
msgstr ""
"ãããããä¼ç¤¾ãããã³ãã¼ãããªãã«é
å¸ãã¦ãããããã¬ã¼ãã»ã·ã¼ã¯ã¬ããã¨"
"主張ãããªãã°ããã®ä¼ç¤¾ã¯GPLã«éåãã¦ãããé
å¸ãåæ¢ããªããã°ãªãã¾ããã"
@@ -5363,6 +5390,32 @@
"ãé
å¸ããã®ã§ã¯ãªãã®ã§ããã®ã±ã¼ã¹ã§ã¯GPLã«ã¯éåãã¦ããªãã®ã§ãã"
#. type: Content of: <dl><dt>
+#, fuzzy
+#| msgid ""
+#| "What if a company distributes a copy as a trade secret? <span class="
+#| "\"anchor-reference-id\">(<a href=\"#TradeSecretRelease\" "
+#| ">#TradeSecretRelease</a>)</span>"
+msgid ""
+"What if a company distributes a copy of its own GPL-covered work to me as a "
+"trade secret? <span class=\"anchor-reference-id\">(<a href="
+"\"#TradeSecretRelease2\" >#TradeSecretRelease2</a>)</span>"
+msgstr ""
+"ããä¼ç¤¾ãããã³ãã¼ããã¬ã¼ãã»ã·ã¼ã¯ã¬ããã¨ãã¦é
å¸ãããã©ãã§ãã? "
+"<span class=\"anchor-reference-id\">(<a href=\"#TradeSecretRelease\" "
+">#TradeSecretRelease</a>)</span>"
+
+#. type: Content of: <dl><dd><p>
+msgid ""
+"If the program distributed does not incorporate anyone else's GPL-covered "
+"work, then the company is not violating the GPL (see “<a href="
+"\"#DeveloperViolate\">Is the developer of a GPL-covered program bound by the "
+"GPL?</a>” for more information). But it is making two contradictory "
+"statements about what you can do with that program: that you can "
+"redistribute it, and that you can't. It would make sense to demand "
+"clarification of the terms for use of that program before you accept a copy."
+msgstr ""
+
+#. type: Content of: <dl><dt>
msgid ""
"Why are some GNU libraries released under the ordinary GPL rather than the "
"Lesser GPL? <span class=\"anchor-reference-id\">(<a href="
Index: gpl-faq.pot
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/licenses/po/gpl-faq.pot,v
retrieving revision 1.88
retrieving revision 1.89
diff -u -b -r1.88 -r1.89
--- gpl-faq.pot 12 Apr 2019 15:31:23 -0000 1.88
+++ gpl-faq.pot 1 Aug 2019 09:00:42 -0000 1.89
@@ -7,7 +7,7 @@
msgid ""
msgstr ""
"Project-Id-Version: gpl-faq.html\n"
-"POT-Creation-Date: 2019-04-12 15:26+0000\n"
+"POT-Creation-Date: 2019-08-01 08:55+0000\n"
"PO-Revision-Date: YEAR-MO-DA HO:MI+ZONE\n"
"Last-Translator: FULL NAME <EMAIL@ADDRESS>\n"
"Language-Team: LANGUAGE <address@hidden>\n"
@@ -635,8 +635,14 @@
#. type: Content of: <ul><li>
msgid ""
-"<a href=\"#TradeSecretRelease\">What if a company distributes a copy as a "
-"trade secret?</a>"
+"<a href=\"#TradeSecretRelease\">What if a company distributes a copy of some "
+"other developers' GPL-covered work to me as a trade secret?</a>"
+msgstr ""
+
+#. type: Content of: <ul><li>
+msgid ""
+"<a href=\"#TradeSecretRelease2\">What if a company distributes a copy of its "
+"own GPL-covered work to me as a trade secret?</a>"
msgstr ""
#. type: Content of: <ul><li>
@@ -3443,18 +3449,35 @@
#. type: Content of: <dl><dt>
msgid ""
-"What if a company distributes a copy as a trade secret? <span "
-"class=\"anchor-reference-id\">(<a href=\"#TradeSecretRelease\" "
-">#TradeSecretRelease</a>)</span>"
+"What if a company distributes a copy of some other developers' GPL-covered "
+"work to me as a trade secret? <span class=\"anchor-reference-id\">(<a "
+"href=\"#TradeSecretRelease\" >#TradeSecretRelease</a>)</span>"
+msgstr ""
+
+#. type: Content of: <dl><dd><p>
+msgid ""
+"The company has violated the GPL and will have to cease distribution of that "
+"program. Note how this differs from the theft case above; the company does "
+"not intentionally distribute a copy when a copy is stolen, so in that case "
+"the company has not violated the GPL."
+msgstr ""
+
+#. type: Content of: <dl><dt>
+msgid ""
+"What if a company distributes a copy of its own GPL-covered work to me as a "
+"trade secret? <span class=\"anchor-reference-id\">(<a "
+"href=\"#TradeSecretRelease2\" >#TradeSecretRelease2</a>)</span>"
msgstr ""
#. type: Content of: <dl><dd><p>
msgid ""
-"If a company distributes a copy to you and claims it is a trade secret, the "
-"company has violated the GPL and will have to cease distribution. Note how "
-"this differs from the theft case above; the company does not intentionally "
-"distribute a copy when a copy is stolen, so in that case the company has not "
-"violated the GPL."
+"If the program distributed does not incorporate anyone else's GPL-covered "
+"work, then the company is not violating the GPL (see “<a "
+"href=\"#DeveloperViolate\">Is the developer of a GPL-covered program bound "
+"by the GPL?</a>” for more information). But it is making two "
+"contradictory statements about what you can do with that program: that you "
+"can redistribute it, and that you can't. It would make sense to demand "
+"clarification of the terms for use of that program before you accept a copy."
msgstr ""
#. type: Content of: <dl><dt>
Index: gpl-faq.ru.po
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/licenses/po/gpl-faq.ru.po,v
retrieving revision 1.165
retrieving revision 1.166
diff -u -b -r1.165 -r1.166
--- gpl-faq.ru.po 13 Jun 2019 16:02:18 -0000 1.165
+++ gpl-faq.ru.po 1 Aug 2019 09:00:42 -0000 1.166
@@ -11,7 +11,7 @@
msgid ""
msgstr ""
"Project-Id-Version: gpl-faq.html\n"
-"POT-Creation-Date: 2019-04-12 15:26+0000\n"
+"POT-Creation-Date: 2019-08-01 08:55+0000\n"
"PO-Revision-Date: 2019-04-12 17:17+0000\n"
"Last-Translator: Ineiev <address@hidden>\n"
"Language-Team: Russian <address@hidden>\n"
@@ -19,6 +19,7 @@
"MIME-Version: 1.0\n"
"Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8\n"
"Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit\n"
+"X-Outdated-Since: 2019-08-01 08:55+0000\n"
#. type: Content of: <title>
msgid ""
@@ -874,9 +875,29 @@
"a>"
#. type: Content of: <ul><li>
+# | <a href=\"#TradeSecretRelease\">What if a company distributes a copy {+of
+# | some other developers' GPL-covered work to me+} as a trade secret?</a>
+#, fuzzy
+#| msgid ""
+#| "<a href=\"#TradeSecretRelease\">What if a company distributes a copy as a "
+#| "trade secret?</a>"
msgid ""
-"<a href=\"#TradeSecretRelease\">What if a company distributes a copy as a "
-"trade secret?</a>"
+"<a href=\"#TradeSecretRelease\">What if a company distributes a copy of some "
+"other developers' GPL-covered work to me as a trade secret?</a>"
+msgstr ""
+"<a href=\"#TradeSecretRelease\">ЧÑо, еÑли пÑедпÑиÑÑие
пеÑÐµÐ´Ð°ÐµÑ ÐºÐ¾Ð¿Ð¸Ñ ÐºÐ°Ðº "
+"коммеÑÑеÑкÑÑ ÑайнÑ?</a>"
+
+#. type: Content of: <ul><li>
+# | <a href=\"#TradeSecretRelease{+2+}\">What if a company distributes a copy
+# | {+of its own GPL-covered work to me+} as a trade secret?</a>
+#, fuzzy
+#| msgid ""
+#| "<a href=\"#TradeSecretRelease\">What if a company distributes a copy as a "
+#| "trade secret?</a>"
+msgid ""
+"<a href=\"#TradeSecretRelease2\">What if a company distributes a copy of its "
+"own GPL-covered work to me as a trade secret?</a>"
msgstr ""
"<a href=\"#TradeSecretRelease\">ЧÑо, еÑли пÑедпÑиÑÑие
пеÑÐµÐ´Ð°ÐµÑ ÐºÐ¾Ð¿Ð¸Ñ ÐºÐ°Ðº "
"коммеÑÑеÑкÑÑ ÑайнÑ?</a>"
@@ -5128,22 +5149,43 @@
"еÑли пÑедпÑиÑÑие ÑÑÑ Ð²ÐµÑÑÐ¸Ñ Ð½Ðµ вÑпÑÑÑило,
Ñо Ñакого наÑÑÑÐµÐ½Ð¸Ñ Ð½Ðµ бÑло."
#. type: Content of: <dl><dt>
-msgid ""
-"What if a company distributes a copy as a trade secret? <span class=\"anchor-"
-"reference-id\">(<a href=\"#TradeSecretRelease\" >#TradeSecretRelease</a>)</"
-"span>"
+# | What if a company distributes a copy {+of some other developers'
+# | GPL-covered work to me+} as a trade secret? <span
+# | class=\"anchor-reference-id\">(<a href=\"#TradeSecretRelease\"
+# | >#TradeSecretRelease</a>)</span>
+#, fuzzy
+#| msgid ""
+#| "What if a company distributes a copy as a trade secret? <span class="
+#| "\"anchor-reference-id\">(<a href=\"#TradeSecretRelease\" "
+#| ">#TradeSecretRelease</a>)</span>"
+msgid ""
+"What if a company distributes a copy of some other developers' GPL-covered "
+"work to me as a trade secret? <span class=\"anchor-reference-id\">(<a href="
+"\"#TradeSecretRelease\" >#TradeSecretRelease</a>)</span>"
msgstr ""
"ЧÑо, еÑли пÑедпÑиÑÑие пеÑÐµÐ´Ð°ÐµÑ ÐºÐ¾Ð¿Ð¸Ñ ÐºÐ°Ðº
коммеÑÑеÑкÑÑ ÑайнÑ? <span class="
"\"anchor-reference-id\">(<a href=\"#TradeSecretRelease\" "
">#TradeSecretRelease</a>)</span>"
#. type: Content of: <dl><dd><p>
-msgid ""
-"If a company distributes a copy to you and claims it is a trade secret, the "
-"company has violated the GPL and will have to cease distribution. Note how "
-"this differs from the theft case above; the company does not intentionally "
-"distribute a copy when a copy is stolen, so in that case the company has not "
-"violated the GPL."
+# | [-If a company distributes a copy to you and claims it is a trade secret,
+# | the-]{+The+} company has violated the GPL and will have to cease
+# | [-distribution.-] {+distribution of that program.+} Note how this differs
+# | from the theft case above; the company does not intentionally distribute a
+# | copy when a copy is stolen, so in that case the company has not violated
+# | the GPL.
+#, fuzzy
+#| msgid ""
+#| "If a company distributes a copy to you and claims it is a trade secret, "
+#| "the company has violated the GPL and will have to cease distribution. "
+#| "Note how this differs from the theft case above; the company does not "
+#| "intentionally distribute a copy when a copy is stolen, so in that case "
+#| "the company has not violated the GPL."
+msgid ""
+"The company has violated the GPL and will have to cease distribution of that "
+"program. Note how this differs from the theft case above; the company does "
+"not intentionally distribute a copy when a copy is stolen, so in that case "
+"the company has not violated the GPL."
msgstr ""
"ÐÑли пÑедпÑиÑÑие пеÑÐµÐ´Ð°ÐµÑ Ð²Ð°Ð¼ ÐºÐ¾Ð¿Ð¸Ñ Ð¸
заÑвлÑеÑ, ÑÑо она ÑвлÑеÑÑÑ "
"коммеÑÑеÑкой Ñайной, ÑÑо пÑедпÑиÑÑие
наÑÑÑило GPL и должно бÑÐ´ÐµÑ Ð¿ÑекÑаÑиÑÑ "
@@ -5152,6 +5194,36 @@
"кÑадÑÑ, Ñак ÑÑо в ÑÑом ÑлÑÑае пÑедпÑиÑÑие
не наÑÑÑÐ°ÐµÑ GPL."
#. type: Content of: <dl><dt>
+# | What if a company distributes a copy {+of its own GPL-covered work to me+}
+# | as a trade secret? <span class=\"anchor-reference-id\">(<a
+# | [-href=\"#TradeSecretRelease\" >#TradeSecretRelease</a>)</span>-]
+# | {+href=\"#TradeSecretRelease2\" >#TradeSecretRelease2</a>)</span>+}
+#, fuzzy
+#| msgid ""
+#| "What if a company distributes a copy as a trade secret? <span class="
+#| "\"anchor-reference-id\">(<a href=\"#TradeSecretRelease\" "
+#| ">#TradeSecretRelease</a>)</span>"
+msgid ""
+"What if a company distributes a copy of its own GPL-covered work to me as a "
+"trade secret? <span class=\"anchor-reference-id\">(<a href="
+"\"#TradeSecretRelease2\" >#TradeSecretRelease2</a>)</span>"
+msgstr ""
+"ЧÑо, еÑли пÑедпÑиÑÑие пеÑÐµÐ´Ð°ÐµÑ ÐºÐ¾Ð¿Ð¸Ñ ÐºÐ°Ðº
коммеÑÑеÑкÑÑ ÑайнÑ? <span class="
+"\"anchor-reference-id\">(<a href=\"#TradeSecretRelease\" "
+">#TradeSecretRelease</a>)</span>"
+
+#. type: Content of: <dl><dd><p>
+msgid ""
+"If the program distributed does not incorporate anyone else's GPL-covered "
+"work, then the company is not violating the GPL (see “<a href="
+"\"#DeveloperViolate\">Is the developer of a GPL-covered program bound by the "
+"GPL?</a>” for more information). But it is making two contradictory "
+"statements about what you can do with that program: that you can "
+"redistribute it, and that you can't. It would make sense to demand "
+"clarification of the terms for use of that program before you accept a copy."
+msgstr ""
+
+#. type: Content of: <dl><dt>
msgid ""
"Why are some GNU libraries released under the ordinary GPL rather than the "
"Lesser GPL? <span class=\"anchor-reference-id\">(<a href="
Index: gpl-faq.ta.po
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/licenses/po/gpl-faq.ta.po,v
retrieving revision 1.79
retrieving revision 1.80
diff -u -b -r1.79 -r1.80
--- gpl-faq.ta.po 2 Jun 2019 10:30:54 -0000 1.79
+++ gpl-faq.ta.po 1 Aug 2019 09:00:42 -0000 1.80
@@ -9,7 +9,7 @@
msgid ""
msgstr ""
"Project-Id-Version: gpl-faq.html\n"
-"POT-Creation-Date: 2019-04-12 15:26+0000\n"
+"POT-Creation-Date: 2019-08-01 08:55+0000\n"
"PO-Revision-Date: 2010-06-20 15:55+0530\n"
"Last-Translator: Amachu <address@hidden>\n"
"Language-Team: Tamil <address@hidden>\n"
@@ -678,8 +678,14 @@
#. type: Content of: <ul><li>
msgid ""
-"<a href=\"#TradeSecretRelease\">What if a company distributes a copy as a "
-"trade secret?</a>"
+"<a href=\"#TradeSecretRelease\">What if a company distributes a copy of some "
+"other developers' GPL-covered work to me as a trade secret?</a>"
+msgstr ""
+
+#. type: Content of: <ul><li>
+msgid ""
+"<a href=\"#TradeSecretRelease2\">What if a company distributes a copy of its "
+"own GPL-covered work to me as a trade secret?</a>"
msgstr ""
#. type: Content of: <ul><li>
@@ -3610,19 +3616,61 @@
msgstr ""
#. type: Content of: <dl><dt>
+# | [-Why should I use the GNU GPL rather than-]{+What if a company
+# | distributes a copy of some+} other [-free software licenses?-]
+# | {+developers' GPL-covered work to me as a trade secret?+} <span
+# | class=\"anchor-reference-id\">(<a [-href=\"#WhyUseGPL\"
+# | >#WhyUseGPL</a>)</span>-] {+href=\"#TradeSecretRelease\"
+# | >#TradeSecretRelease</a>)</span>+}
+#, fuzzy
+#| msgid ""
+#| "Why should I use the GNU GPL rather than other free software licenses? "
+#| "<span class=\"anchor-reference-id\">(<a href=\"#WhyUseGPL\" >#WhyUseGPL</"
+#| "a>)</span>"
msgid ""
-"What if a company distributes a copy as a trade secret? <span class=\"anchor-"
-"reference-id\">(<a href=\"#TradeSecretRelease\" >#TradeSecretRelease</a>)</"
-"span>"
+"What if a company distributes a copy of some other developers' GPL-covered "
+"work to me as a trade secret? <span class=\"anchor-reference-id\">(<a href="
+"\"#TradeSecretRelease\" >#TradeSecretRelease</a>)</span>"
msgstr ""
+"à®à®©à¯à®¯ à®à®à¯à®à®±à¯à®± à®à®°à®¿à®®à®à¯à®à®³à¯
à®à®¾à®à¯à®à®¿à®²à¯à®®à¯ நான௠à®à®©à¯ GNU GPLà®
பயனà¯à®ªà®à¯à®¤à¯à®¤ வà¯à®£à¯à®à¯à®®à¯? <span class="
+"\"anchor-reference-id\">(<a href=\"#WhyUseGPL\" >#WhyUseGPL</a>)</span>"
+
+#. type: Content of: <dl><dd><p>
+msgid ""
+"The company has violated the GPL and will have to cease distribution of that "
+"program. Note how this differs from the theft case above; the company does "
+"not intentionally distribute a copy when a copy is stolen, so in that case "
+"the company has not violated the GPL."
+msgstr ""
+
+#. type: Content of: <dl><dt>
+# | [-Why should I use the GNU GPL rather than other free software
+# | licenses?-]{+What if a company distributes a copy of its own GPL-covered
+# | work to me as a trade secret?+} <span class=\"anchor-reference-id\">(<a
+# | [-href=\"#WhyUseGPL\" >#WhyUseGPL</a>)</span>-]
+# | {+href=\"#TradeSecretRelease2\" >#TradeSecretRelease2</a>)</span>+}
+#, fuzzy
+#| msgid ""
+#| "Why should I use the GNU GPL rather than other free software licenses? "
+#| "<span class=\"anchor-reference-id\">(<a href=\"#WhyUseGPL\" >#WhyUseGPL</"
+#| "a>)</span>"
+msgid ""
+"What if a company distributes a copy of its own GPL-covered work to me as a "
+"trade secret? <span class=\"anchor-reference-id\">(<a href="
+"\"#TradeSecretRelease2\" >#TradeSecretRelease2</a>)</span>"
+msgstr ""
+"à®à®©à¯à®¯ à®à®à¯à®à®±à¯à®± à®à®°à®¿à®®à®à¯à®à®³à¯
à®à®¾à®à¯à®à®¿à®²à¯à®®à¯ நான௠à®à®©à¯ GNU GPLà®
பயனà¯à®ªà®à¯à®¤à¯à®¤ வà¯à®£à¯à®à¯à®®à¯? <span class="
+"\"anchor-reference-id\">(<a href=\"#WhyUseGPL\" >#WhyUseGPL</a>)</span>"
#. type: Content of: <dl><dd><p>
msgid ""
-"If a company distributes a copy to you and claims it is a trade secret, the "
-"company has violated the GPL and will have to cease distribution. Note how "
-"this differs from the theft case above; the company does not intentionally "
-"distribute a copy when a copy is stolen, so in that case the company has not "
-"violated the GPL."
+"If the program distributed does not incorporate anyone else's GPL-covered "
+"work, then the company is not violating the GPL (see “<a href="
+"\"#DeveloperViolate\">Is the developer of a GPL-covered program bound by the "
+"GPL?</a>” for more information). But it is making two contradictory "
+"statements about what you can do with that program: that you can "
+"redistribute it, and that you can't. It would make sense to demand "
+"clarification of the terms for use of that program before you accept a copy."
msgstr ""
#. type: Content of: <dl><dt>
Index: gpl-faq.zh-cn.po
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/licenses/po/gpl-faq.zh-cn.po,v
retrieving revision 1.7
retrieving revision 1.8
diff -u -b -r1.7 -r1.8
--- gpl-faq.zh-cn.po 8 Jun 2019 15:42:34 -0000 1.7
+++ gpl-faq.zh-cn.po 1 Aug 2019 09:00:42 -0000 1.8
@@ -6,7 +6,7 @@
msgid ""
msgstr ""
"Project-Id-Version: gpl-faq.html\n"
-"POT-Creation-Date: 2019-04-12 15:26+0000\n"
+"POT-Creation-Date: 2019-08-01 08:55+0000\n"
"PO-Revision-Date: 2019-06-08 21:01+0800\n"
"Last-Translator: Wensheng Xie <address@hidden>\n"
"Language-Team: Chinese <address@hidden>\n"
@@ -14,6 +14,7 @@
"MIME-Version: 1.0\n"
"Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8\n"
"Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit\n"
+"X-Outdated-Since: 2019-08-01 08:55+0000\n"
#. type: Content of: <title>
msgid ""
@@ -779,9 +780,25 @@
"人ååå¸è¯¥è½¯ä»¶ï¼</a>"
#. type: Content of: <ul><li>
+#, fuzzy
+#| msgid ""
+#| "<a href=\"#TradeSecretRelease\">What if a company distributes a copy as a "
+#| "trade secret?</a>"
msgid ""
-"<a href=\"#TradeSecretRelease\">What if a company distributes a copy as a "
-"trade secret?</a>"
+"<a href=\"#TradeSecretRelease\">What if a company distributes a copy of some "
+"other developers' GPL-covered work to me as a trade secret?</a>"
+msgstr ""
+"<a href=\"#TradeSecretRelease\">å¦æå
¬å¸æç
§åä¸ç§å¯æ¥åå¸è½¯ä»¶æ·è´ä¼æä¹æ ·ï¼"
+"</a>"
+
+#. type: Content of: <ul><li>
+#, fuzzy
+#| msgid ""
+#| "<a href=\"#TradeSecretRelease\">What if a company distributes a copy as a "
+#| "trade secret?</a>"
+msgid ""
+"<a href=\"#TradeSecretRelease2\">What if a company distributes a copy of its "
+"own GPL-covered work to me as a trade secret?</a>"
msgstr ""
"<a href=\"#TradeSecretRelease\">å¦æå
¬å¸æç
§åä¸ç§å¯æ¥åå¸è½¯ä»¶æ·è´ä¼æä¹æ ·ï¼"
"</a>"
@@ -4445,27 +4462,63 @@
"ä¹å®å°±æ²¡æè¿å GPLã"
#. type: Content of: <dl><dt>
-msgid ""
-"What if a company distributes a copy as a trade secret? <span class=\"anchor-"
-"reference-id\">(<a href=\"#TradeSecretRelease\" >#TradeSecretRelease</a>)</"
-"span>"
+#, fuzzy
+#| msgid ""
+#| "What if a company distributes a copy as a trade secret? <span class="
+#| "\"anchor-reference-id\">(<a href=\"#TradeSecretRelease\" "
+#| ">#TradeSecretRelease</a>)</span>"
+msgid ""
+"What if a company distributes a copy of some other developers' GPL-covered "
+"work to me as a trade secret? <span class=\"anchor-reference-id\">(<a href="
+"\"#TradeSecretRelease\" >#TradeSecretRelease</a>)</span>"
msgstr ""
"å¦æå
¬å¸æç
§åä¸ç§å¯æ¥åå¸è½¯ä»¶æ·è´ä¼æä¹æ ·ï¼<span
class=\"anchor-reference-id"
"\">(<a href=\"#TradeSecretRelease\" >#TradeSecretRelease</a>)</span>"
#. type: Content of: <dl><dd><p>
-msgid ""
-"If a company distributes a copy to you and claims it is a trade secret, the "
-"company has violated the GPL and will have to cease distribution. Note how "
-"this differs from the theft case above; the company does not intentionally "
-"distribute a copy when a copy is stolen, so in that case the company has not "
-"violated the GPL."
+#, fuzzy
+#| msgid ""
+#| "If a company distributes a copy to you and claims it is a trade secret, "
+#| "the company has violated the GPL and will have to cease distribution. "
+#| "Note how this differs from the theft case above; the company does not "
+#| "intentionally distribute a copy when a copy is stolen, so in that case "
+#| "the company has not violated the GPL."
+msgid ""
+"The company has violated the GPL and will have to cease distribution of that "
+"program. Note how this differs from the theft case above; the company does "
+"not intentionally distribute a copy when a copy is stolen, so in that case "
+"the company has not violated the GPL."
msgstr ""
"å¦æä¸ä¸ªå
¬å¸åå¸æ·è´å¹¶å£°ç§°è¿æ¯åä¸æºå¯ï¼é£ä¹è¯¥å
¬å¸è¿åäº GPL 并ä¸å¿
é¡»åæ¢å"
"å¸ã请注æè¿åä¸é¢çççªé®é¢ä¸åï¼è½¯ä»¶æ·è´éå°ççªæ¶ï¼å
¬å¸å¹¶æªææåå¸è¯¥è½¯"
"件ï¼å æ¤å
¬å¸æ²¡æè¿å GPLã"
#. type: Content of: <dl><dt>
+#, fuzzy
+#| msgid ""
+#| "What if a company distributes a copy as a trade secret? <span class="
+#| "\"anchor-reference-id\">(<a href=\"#TradeSecretRelease\" "
+#| ">#TradeSecretRelease</a>)</span>"
+msgid ""
+"What if a company distributes a copy of its own GPL-covered work to me as a "
+"trade secret? <span class=\"anchor-reference-id\">(<a href="
+"\"#TradeSecretRelease2\" >#TradeSecretRelease2</a>)</span>"
+msgstr ""
+"å¦æå
¬å¸æç
§åä¸ç§å¯æ¥åå¸è½¯ä»¶æ·è´ä¼æä¹æ ·ï¼<span
class=\"anchor-reference-id"
+"\">(<a href=\"#TradeSecretRelease\" >#TradeSecretRelease</a>)</span>"
+
+#. type: Content of: <dl><dd><p>
+msgid ""
+"If the program distributed does not incorporate anyone else's GPL-covered "
+"work, then the company is not violating the GPL (see “<a href="
+"\"#DeveloperViolate\">Is the developer of a GPL-covered program bound by the "
+"GPL?</a>” for more information). But it is making two contradictory "
+"statements about what you can do with that program: that you can "
+"redistribute it, and that you can't. It would make sense to demand "
+"clarification of the terms for use of that program before you accept a copy."
+msgstr ""
+
+#. type: Content of: <dl><dt>
msgid ""
"Why are some GNU libraries released under the ordinary GPL rather than the "
"Lesser GPL? <span class=\"anchor-reference-id\">(<a href="
- www/licenses/po gpl-faq.es.po gpl-faq.fr.po gpl...,
GNUN <=