www/gnu/po thegnuproject.ca.po

[Therese Godefroy]

CVSROOT:        /webcvs/www
Module name:    www
Changes by:     Therese Godefroy <th_g> 19/07/21 16:04:20

Modified files:
        gnu/po         : thegnuproject.ca.po 

Log message:
        Unfuzzify a string.

CVSWeb URLs:
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/gnu/po/thegnuproject.ca.po?cvsroot=www&r1=1.51&r2=1.52

Patches:
Index: thegnuproject.ca.po
===================================================================
RCS file: /webcvs/www/www/gnu/po/thegnuproject.ca.po,v
retrieving revision 1.51
retrieving revision 1.52
diff -u -b -r1.51 -r1.52
--- thegnuproject.ca.po 13 May 2019 18:00:42 -0000      1.51
+++ thegnuproject.ca.po 21 Jul 2019 20:04:20 -0000      1.52
@@ -805,24 +805,6 @@
 "aquests usuaris disposarien de drets; només de què fossin nombrosos."
 
 #. type: Content of: <p>
-# | This led to a paradoxical situation where two different ways of counting
-# | the amount of freedom gave different answers to the question, [-«Is-]
-# | {+&ldquo;Is+} this program free?&rdquo; If you judged based on the freedom
-# | provided by the distribution terms of the MIT release, you would say that
-# | X was free software.  But if you measured the freedom of the average user
-# | of X, you would have to say it was proprietary software.  Most X users
-# | were running the proprietary versions that came with Unix systems, not the
-# | free version.
-#, fuzzy
-#| msgid ""
-#| "This led to a paradoxical situation where two different ways of counting "
-#| "the amount of freedom gave different answers to the question, «Is this "
-#| "program free?&rdquo; If you judged based on the freedom provided by the "
-#| "distribution terms of the MIT release, you would say that X was free "
-#| "software.  But if you measured the freedom of the average user of X, you "
-#| "would have to say it was proprietary software.  Most X users were running "
-#| "the proprietary versions that came with Unix systems, not the free "
-#| "version."
 msgid ""
 "This led to a paradoxical situation where two different ways of counting the "
 "amount of freedom gave different answers to the question, &ldquo;Is this "