[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
www/philosophy open-source-misses-the-point.de....
|
From: |
GNUN |
|
Subject: |
www/philosophy open-source-misses-the-point.de.... |
|
Date: |
Sun, 28 Apr 2019 07:59:32 -0400 (EDT) |
CVSROOT: /web/www
Module name: www
Changes by: GNUN <gnun> 19/04/28 07:59:31
Modified files:
philosophy : open-source-misses-the-point.de.html
open-source-misses-the-point.it.html
open-source-misses-the-point.ja.html
open-source-misses-the-point.nl.html
open-source-misses-the-point.pl.html
open-source-misses-the-point.sq.html
open-source-misses-the-point.uk.html
philosophy/po : open-source-misses-the-point.ar-diff.html
open-source-misses-the-point.ar.po
open-source-misses-the-point.bg.po
open-source-misses-the-point.de-diff.html
open-source-misses-the-point.de.po
open-source-misses-the-point.el.po
open-source-misses-the-point.es.po
open-source-misses-the-point.fa.po
open-source-misses-the-point.fr.po
open-source-misses-the-point.hr-diff.html
open-source-misses-the-point.hr.po
open-source-misses-the-point.it-diff.html
open-source-misses-the-point.it.po
open-source-misses-the-point.ja-diff.html
open-source-misses-the-point.ja.po
open-source-misses-the-point.lt-diff.html
open-source-misses-the-point.lt.po
open-source-misses-the-point.ml.po
open-source-misses-the-point.nl-diff.html
open-source-misses-the-point.nl.po
open-source-misses-the-point.pl-diff.html
open-source-misses-the-point.pl.po
open-source-misses-the-point.pot
open-source-misses-the-point.pt-br.po
open-source-misses-the-point.ro.po
open-source-misses-the-point.ru.po
open-source-misses-the-point.sq-diff.html
open-source-misses-the-point.sq.po
open-source-misses-the-point.ta.po
open-source-misses-the-point.tr.po
open-source-misses-the-point.uk-diff.html
open-source-misses-the-point.uk.po
open-source-misses-the-point.zh-cn.po
Log message:
Automatic update by GNUnited Nations.
CVSWeb URLs:
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/open-source-misses-the-point.de.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.71&r2=1.72
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/open-source-misses-the-point.it.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.51&r2=1.52
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/open-source-misses-the-point.ja.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.47&r2=1.48
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/open-source-misses-the-point.nl.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.22&r2=1.23
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/open-source-misses-the-point.pl.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.49&r2=1.50
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/open-source-misses-the-point.sq.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.33&r2=1.34
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/open-source-misses-the-point.uk.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.16&r2=1.17
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/po/open-source-misses-the-point.ar-diff.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.25&r2=1.26
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/po/open-source-misses-the-point.ar.po?cvsroot=www&r1=1.74&r2=1.75
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/po/open-source-misses-the-point.bg.po?cvsroot=www&r1=1.50&r2=1.51
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/po/open-source-misses-the-point.de-diff.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.2&r2=1.3
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/po/open-source-misses-the-point.de.po?cvsroot=www&r1=1.103&r2=1.104
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/po/open-source-misses-the-point.el.po?cvsroot=www&r1=1.17&r2=1.18
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/po/open-source-misses-the-point.es.po?cvsroot=www&r1=1.104&r2=1.105
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/po/open-source-misses-the-point.fa.po?cvsroot=www&r1=1.59&r2=1.60
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/po/open-source-misses-the-point.fr.po?cvsroot=www&r1=1.104&r2=1.105
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/po/open-source-misses-the-point.hr-diff.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.16&r2=1.17
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/po/open-source-misses-the-point.hr.po?cvsroot=www&r1=1.35&r2=1.36
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/po/open-source-misses-the-point.it-diff.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.1&r2=1.2
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/po/open-source-misses-the-point.it.po?cvsroot=www&r1=1.77&r2=1.78
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/po/open-source-misses-the-point.ja-diff.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.1&r2=1.2
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/po/open-source-misses-the-point.ja.po?cvsroot=www&r1=1.73&r2=1.74
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/po/open-source-misses-the-point.lt-diff.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.7&r2=1.8
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/po/open-source-misses-the-point.lt.po?cvsroot=www&r1=1.17&r2=1.18
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/po/open-source-misses-the-point.ml.po?cvsroot=www&r1=1.60&r2=1.61
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/po/open-source-misses-the-point.nl-diff.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.28&r2=1.29
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/po/open-source-misses-the-point.nl.po?cvsroot=www&r1=1.47&r2=1.48
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/po/open-source-misses-the-point.pl-diff.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.6&r2=1.7
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/po/open-source-misses-the-point.pl.po?cvsroot=www&r1=1.74&r2=1.75
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/po/open-source-misses-the-point.pot?cvsroot=www&r1=1.46&r2=1.47
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/po/open-source-misses-the-point.pt-br.po?cvsroot=www&r1=1.42&r2=1.43
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/po/open-source-misses-the-point.ro.po?cvsroot=www&r1=1.42&r2=1.43
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/po/open-source-misses-the-point.ru.po?cvsroot=www&r1=1.101&r2=1.102
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/po/open-source-misses-the-point.sq-diff.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.4&r2=1.5
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/po/open-source-misses-the-point.sq.po?cvsroot=www&r1=1.74&r2=1.75
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/po/open-source-misses-the-point.ta.po?cvsroot=www&r1=1.4&r2=1.5
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/po/open-source-misses-the-point.tr.po?cvsroot=www&r1=1.44&r2=1.45
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/po/open-source-misses-the-point.uk-diff.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.2&r2=1.3
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/po/open-source-misses-the-point.uk.po?cvsroot=www&r1=1.43&r2=1.44
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/po/open-source-misses-the-point.zh-cn.po?cvsroot=www&r1=1.56&r2=1.57
Patches:
Index: open-source-misses-the-point.de.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/open-source-misses-the-point.de.html,v
retrieving revision 1.71
retrieving revision 1.72
diff -u -b -r1.71 -r1.72
--- open-source-misses-the-point.de.html 21 Apr 2019 10:30:26 -0000
1.71
+++ open-source-misses-the-point.de.html 28 Apr 2019 11:59:29 -0000
1.72
@@ -3,7 +3,7 @@
https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/po/open-source-misses-the-point.de.po</a>'
--><!--#set var="ORIGINAL_FILE"
value="/philosophy/open-source-misses-the-point.html"
--><!--#set var="DIFF_FILE"
value="/philosophy/po/open-source-misses-the-point.de-diff.html"
- --><!--#set var="OUTDATED_SINCE" value="2019-02-20" --><!--#set
var="ENGLISH_PAGE" value="/philosophy/open-source-misses-the-point.en.html" -->
+ --><!--#set var="OUTDATED_SINCE" value="2019-02-20" -->
<!--#include virtual="/server/header.de.html" -->
<!-- Parent-Version: 1.79 -->
@@ -531,7 +531,7 @@
<p class="unprintable"><!-- timestamp start -->
Letzte Ãnderung:
-$Date: 2019/04/21 10:30:26 $
+$Date: 2019/04/28 11:59:29 $
<!-- timestamp end -->
</p>
Index: open-source-misses-the-point.it.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/open-source-misses-the-point.it.html,v
retrieving revision 1.51
retrieving revision 1.52
diff -u -b -r1.51 -r1.52
--- open-source-misses-the-point.it.html 21 Apr 2019 10:30:26 -0000
1.51
+++ open-source-misses-the-point.it.html 28 Apr 2019 11:59:29 -0000
1.52
@@ -3,7 +3,7 @@
https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/po/open-source-misses-the-point.it.po</a>'
--><!--#set var="ORIGINAL_FILE"
value="/philosophy/open-source-misses-the-point.html"
--><!--#set var="DIFF_FILE"
value="/philosophy/po/open-source-misses-the-point.it-diff.html"
- --><!--#set var="OUTDATED_SINCE" value="2019-02-20" --><!--#set
var="ENGLISH_PAGE" value="/philosophy/open-source-misses-the-point.en.html" -->
+ --><!--#set var="OUTDATED_SINCE" value="2019-02-20" -->
<!--#include virtual="/server/header.it.html" -->
<!-- Parent-Version: 1.79 -->
@@ -517,7 +517,7 @@
<p class="unprintable"><!-- timestamp start -->
Ultimo aggiornamento:
-$Date: 2019/04/21 10:30:26 $
+$Date: 2019/04/28 11:59:29 $
<!-- timestamp end -->
</p>
Index: open-source-misses-the-point.ja.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/open-source-misses-the-point.ja.html,v
retrieving revision 1.47
retrieving revision 1.48
diff -u -b -r1.47 -r1.48
--- open-source-misses-the-point.ja.html 21 Apr 2019 10:30:26 -0000
1.47
+++ open-source-misses-the-point.ja.html 28 Apr 2019 11:59:29 -0000
1.48
@@ -3,7 +3,7 @@
https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/po/open-source-misses-the-point.ja.po</a>'
--><!--#set var="ORIGINAL_FILE"
value="/philosophy/open-source-misses-the-point.html"
--><!--#set var="DIFF_FILE"
value="/philosophy/po/open-source-misses-the-point.ja-diff.html"
- --><!--#set var="OUTDATED_SINCE" value="2019-02-20" --><!--#set
var="ENGLISH_PAGE" value="/philosophy/open-source-misses-the-point.en.html" -->
+ --><!--#set var="OUTDATED_SINCE" value="2019-02-20" -->
<!--#include virtual="/server/header.ja.html" -->
<!-- Parent-Version: 1.79 -->
@@ -220,7 +220,7 @@
<p class="unprintable"><!-- timestamp start -->
æçµæ´æ°:
-$Date: 2019/04/21 10:30:26 $
+$Date: 2019/04/28 11:59:29 $
<!-- timestamp end -->
</p>
Index: open-source-misses-the-point.nl.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/open-source-misses-the-point.nl.html,v
retrieving revision 1.22
retrieving revision 1.23
diff -u -b -r1.22 -r1.23
--- open-source-misses-the-point.nl.html 21 Apr 2019 10:30:26 -0000
1.22
+++ open-source-misses-the-point.nl.html 28 Apr 2019 11:59:29 -0000
1.23
@@ -3,7 +3,7 @@
https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/po/open-source-misses-the-point.nl.po</a>'
--><!--#set var="ORIGINAL_FILE"
value="/philosophy/open-source-misses-the-point.html"
--><!--#set var="DIFF_FILE"
value="/philosophy/po/open-source-misses-the-point.nl-diff.html"
- --><!--#set var="OUTDATED_SINCE" value="2019-02-20" --><!--#set
var="ENGLISH_PAGE" value="/philosophy/open-source-misses-the-point.en.html" -->
+ --><!--#set var="OUTDATED_SINCE" value="2019-02-20" -->
<!--#include virtual="/server/header.nl.html" -->
<!-- Parent-Version: 1.79 -->
@@ -468,7 +468,7 @@
<p class="unprintable"><!-- timestamp start -->
Bijgewerkt:
-$Date: 2019/04/21 10:30:26 $
+$Date: 2019/04/28 11:59:29 $
<!-- timestamp end -->
</p>
Index: open-source-misses-the-point.pl.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/open-source-misses-the-point.pl.html,v
retrieving revision 1.49
retrieving revision 1.50
diff -u -b -r1.49 -r1.50
--- open-source-misses-the-point.pl.html 21 Apr 2019 10:30:26 -0000
1.49
+++ open-source-misses-the-point.pl.html 28 Apr 2019 11:59:29 -0000
1.50
@@ -3,7 +3,7 @@
https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/po/open-source-misses-the-point.pl.po</a>'
--><!--#set var="ORIGINAL_FILE"
value="/philosophy/open-source-misses-the-point.html"
--><!--#set var="DIFF_FILE"
value="/philosophy/po/open-source-misses-the-point.pl-diff.html"
- --><!--#set var="OUTDATED_SINCE" value="2019-02-20" --><!--#set
var="ENGLISH_PAGE" value="/philosophy/open-source-misses-the-point.en.html" -->
+ --><!--#set var="OUTDATED_SINCE" value="2019-02-20" -->
<!--#include virtual="/server/header.pl.html" -->
<!-- Parent-Version: 1.79 -->
@@ -539,7 +539,7 @@
<p class="unprintable"><!-- timestamp start -->
Aktualizowane:
-$Date: 2019/04/21 10:30:26 $
+$Date: 2019/04/28 11:59:29 $
<!-- timestamp end -->
</p>
Index: open-source-misses-the-point.sq.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/open-source-misses-the-point.sq.html,v
retrieving revision 1.33
retrieving revision 1.34
diff -u -b -r1.33 -r1.34
--- open-source-misses-the-point.sq.html 21 Apr 2019 10:30:26 -0000
1.33
+++ open-source-misses-the-point.sq.html 28 Apr 2019 11:59:29 -0000
1.34
@@ -3,7 +3,7 @@
https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/po/open-source-misses-the-point.sq.po</a>'
--><!--#set var="ORIGINAL_FILE"
value="/philosophy/open-source-misses-the-point.html"
--><!--#set var="DIFF_FILE"
value="/philosophy/po/open-source-misses-the-point.sq-diff.html"
- --><!--#set var="OUTDATED_SINCE" value="2019-02-20" --><!--#set
var="ENGLISH_PAGE" value="/philosophy/open-source-misses-the-point.en.html" -->
+ --><!--#set var="OUTDATED_SINCE" value="2019-02-20" -->
<!--#include virtual="/server/header.sq.html" -->
<!-- Parent-Version: 1.79 -->
@@ -497,7 +497,7 @@
<p class="unprintable"><!-- timestamp start -->
U përditësua më:
-$Date: 2019/04/21 10:30:26 $
+$Date: 2019/04/28 11:59:29 $
<!-- timestamp end -->
</p>
Index: open-source-misses-the-point.uk.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/open-source-misses-the-point.uk.html,v
retrieving revision 1.16
retrieving revision 1.17
diff -u -b -r1.16 -r1.17
--- open-source-misses-the-point.uk.html 21 Apr 2019 10:30:26 -0000
1.16
+++ open-source-misses-the-point.uk.html 28 Apr 2019 11:59:29 -0000
1.17
@@ -3,7 +3,7 @@
https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/po/open-source-misses-the-point.uk.po</a>'
--><!--#set var="ORIGINAL_FILE"
value="/philosophy/open-source-misses-the-point.html"
--><!--#set var="DIFF_FILE"
value="/philosophy/po/open-source-misses-the-point.uk-diff.html"
- --><!--#set var="OUTDATED_SINCE" value="2019-02-20" --><!--#set
var="ENGLISH_PAGE" value="/philosophy/open-source-misses-the-point.en.html" -->
+ --><!--#set var="OUTDATED_SINCE" value="2019-02-20" -->
<!--#include virtual="/server/header.uk.html" -->
<!-- Parent-Version: 1.79 -->
@@ -499,7 +499,7 @@
<p class="unprintable"><!-- timestamp start -->
Ðновлено:
-$Date: 2019/04/21 10:30:26 $
+$Date: 2019/04/28 11:59:29 $
<!-- timestamp end -->
</p>
Index: po/open-source-misses-the-point.ar-diff.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/po/open-source-misses-the-point.ar-diff.html,v
retrieving revision 1.25
retrieving revision 1.26
diff -u -b -r1.25 -r1.26
--- po/open-source-misses-the-point.ar-diff.html 2 Mar 2019 03:30:03
-0000 1.25
+++ po/open-source-misses-the-point.ar-diff.html 28 Apr 2019 11:59:30
-0000 1.26
@@ -133,26 +133,38 @@
because its license does not allow making a modified version and using
it privately.</em></ins></span> Fortunately, few programs use <span
class="removed"><del><strong>those</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>such</em></ins></span> licenses.</p>
-<p>Second, and more <span
class="removed"><del><strong>important,</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>important in practice,</em></ins></span> many
products containing
-computers
-<span class="removed"><del><strong>(including many Android devices) come
with</strong></del></span> <span class="inserted"><ins><em>check signatures on
their</em></ins></span> executable programs <span
class="removed"><del><strong>that
-correspond</strong></del></span> to <span class="removed"><del><strong>free
software source code, but the devices do not allow
-the user to install modified versions of those</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>block users
+<p>Second, <span class="removed"><del><strong>and more important, many
products containing computers
+(including many Android devices) come</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>when a program's source code carries a weak license,
one
+without copyleft, its executables can carry additional nonfree
+conditions. <a href="https://code.visualstudio.com/License/">Microsoft
+does this</em></ins></span> with <span class="removed"><del><strong>executable
programs that</strong></del></span> <span class="inserted"><ins><em>Visual
Studio,</a> for example.</p>
+
+<p>If these executables fully</em></ins></span> correspond to <span
class="removed"><del><strong>free software</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>the released sources, they
+qualify as open</em></ins></span> source <span
class="removed"><del><strong>code,</strong></del></span> but <span
class="removed"><del><strong>the devices do</strong></del></span> not <span
class="removed"><del><strong>allow</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>as free software. However, in that
+case users can compile</em></ins></span> the <span
class="removed"><del><strong>user</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>source code</em></ins></span> to <span
class="removed"><del><strong>install modified versions of
those</strong></del></span> <span class="inserted"><ins><em>make and distribute
free
+executables.</p>
+
+<p>Finally, and most important in practice, many products containing
+computers check signatures on their executable programs to block users
from installing different</em></ins></span> executables; only one
<span class="removed"><del><strong>special</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>privileged</em></ins></span> company <span
class="removed"><del><strong>has</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>can
make executables that can run in</em></ins></span> the <span
class="removed"><del><strong>power to modify them.</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>device or can access its full
capabilities.</em></ins></span> We call these devices “tyrants”,
and the
practice is called “tivoization” after the product <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>(Tivo)</em></ins></span>
where we first saw it.
-<span class="removed"><del><strong>These executables are
not</strong></del></span> <span class="inserted"><ins><em>Even if the
executable is made from</em></ins></span> free <span
class="removed"><del><strong>software even though their</strong></del></span>
-source <span class="removed"><del><strong>code</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>code, the users cannot run modified versions of it,
so the
-executable</em></ins></span> is <span class="removed"><del><strong>free
software. The</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>nonfree.</p>
-
-<p>The</em></ins></span> criteria for open source do not recognize this
issue; they are
-concerned solely with the licensing of the source <span
class="removed"><del><strong>code.</p></strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>code. Thus, these
-unmodifiable executables, when made from source code such as Linux
-that is open source and free, are open source but not free. Many
-Android products contain nonfree tivoized executables of
Linux.</p></em></ins></span>
+<span class="removed"><del><strong>These executables are
not</strong></del></span> <span class="inserted"><ins><em>Even if the
executable is made from</em></ins></span> free <span
class="removed"><del><strong>software</strong></del></span>
+<span class="inserted"><ins><em>source code, and nominally carries a free
license, the users cannot
+run modified versions of it, so the executable is de-facto nonfree.</p>
+
+<p>Many Android products contain nonfree tivoized executables of
+Linux,</em></ins></span> even though <span
class="removed"><del><strong>their</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>its</em></ins></span> source code is <span
class="removed"><del><strong>free software. The</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>under GNU GPL version 2. We
+designed GNU GPL version 3 to prohibit this practice.</p>
+
+<p>The</em></ins></span> criteria for open source <span
class="removed"><del><strong>do not recognize this
+issue; they</strong></del></span> are concerned solely with the
+licensing of the source <span
class="removed"><del><strong>code.</p></strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>code. Thus, these nonfree executables, when
+made from source code such as Linux that is open source and free, are
+open source but not free.</p></em></ins></span>
<h3>Common Misunderstandings of “Free Software” and
“Open Source”</h3>
@@ -197,11 +209,11 @@
that anyone can get copies of its source code files.” I don't
think he deliberately sought to reject or dispute the official
definition. I think he simply applied the conventions of the English
-language to come up with a meaning for the term. The <span
class="removed"><del><strong>state</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em><a
-href="https://web.archive.org/web/20001011193422/http://da.state.ks.us/ITEC/TechArchPt6ver80.pdf">state</em></ins></span>
-of <span class="removed"><del><strong>Kansas</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>Kansas</a></em></ins></span> published a
similar definition:
-<span class="removed"><del><strong><!-- It was from
http://da.state.ks.us/itec/TechArchPt6ver80.pdf, but
-that page is no longer available. --></strong></del></span> “Make use
of
+language to come up with a meaning for the term. The <span
class="removed"><del><strong>state of Kansas published a similar definition:
+<!-- It was from http://da.state.ks.us/itec/TechArchPt6ver80.pdf, but
+that page is no longer available. --></strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em><a
+href="https://web.archive.org/web/20001011193422/http://da.state.ks.us/ITEC/TechArchPt6ver80.pdf">state
+of Kansas</a> published a similar definition:</em></ins></span>
“Make use of
open-source software (OSS). OSS is software for which the source code
is freely and publicly available, though the specific licensing
agreements vary as to what one is allowed to do with that
@@ -506,7 +518,7 @@
<span class="inserted"><ins><em><p
class="unprintable">Updated:</em></ins></span>
<!-- timestamp start -->
-$Date: 2019/03/02 03:30:03 $
+$Date: 2019/04/28 11:59:30 $
<!-- timestamp end -->
</p>
</div>
Index: po/open-source-misses-the-point.ar.po
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/po/open-source-misses-the-point.ar.po,v
retrieving revision 1.74
retrieving revision 1.75
diff -u -b -r1.74 -r1.75
--- po/open-source-misses-the-point.ar.po 2 Mar 2019 03:30:05 -0000
1.74
+++ po/open-source-misses-the-point.ar.po 28 Apr 2019 11:59:30 -0000
1.75
@@ -10,7 +10,7 @@
msgid ""
msgstr ""
"Project-Id-Version: open-source-misses-the-point\n"
-"POT-Creation-Date: 2019-03-02 03:26+0000\n"
+"POT-Creation-Date: 2019-04-28 11:56+0000\n"
"PO-Revision-Date: 2014-09-27 17:26+0100\n"
"Last-Translator: Rafik E. Younan <address@hidden>\n"
"Language-Team: Arabic <address@hidden>\n"
@@ -291,6 +291,21 @@
"Ù
ÙÙدة ÙÙØرÙØ§ØªØ ÙØ°ÙÙ Ùا تؤÙÙ Ùأ٠تعد رخص
Øرة. ÙØس٠اÙØØ¸Ø Ø¨Ø±Ù
جÙات ÙÙÙÙØ© تستخدÙ
"
"تÙ٠اÙرخص."
+#. type: Content of: <div><p>
+msgid ""
+"Second, when a program's source code carries a weak license, one without "
+"copyleft, its executables can carry additional nonfree conditions. <a href="
+"\"https://code.visualstudio.com/License/\";>Microsoft does this with Visual "
+"Studio,</a> for example."
+msgstr ""
+
+#. type: Content of: <div><p>
+msgid ""
+"If these executables fully correspond to the released sources, they qualify "
+"as open source but not as free software. However, in that case users can "
+"compile the source code to make and distribute free executables."
+msgstr ""
+
# | Second, and more [-important,-] {+important in practice,+} many products
# | containing computers [-(including many Android devices) come with-]
# | {+check signatures on their+} executable programs [-that correspond-] to
@@ -321,14 +336,15 @@
#| "for open source do not recognize this issue; they are concerned solely "
#| "with the licensing of the source code."
msgid ""
-"Second, and more important in practice, many products containing computers "
+"Finally, and most important in practice, many products containing computers "
"check signatures on their executable programs to block users from installing "
"different executables; only one privileged company can make executables that "
"can run in the device or can access its full capabilities. We call these "
"devices “tyrants”, and the practice is called “"
"tivoization” after the product (Tivo) where we first saw it. Even if "
-"the executable is made from free source code, the users cannot run modified "
-"versions of it, so the executable is nonfree."
+"the executable is made from free source code, and nominally carries a free "
+"license, the users cannot run modified versions of it, so the executable is "
+"de-facto nonfree."
msgstr ""
"ثاÙÙاÙØ ÙاÙØ£ÙÙ
Ø Ø§ÙعدÙد Ù
٠اÙÙ
Ùتجات اÙتÙ
تØÙÙ Øاسبات (بÙ
ا ÙÙ Ø°Ù٠اÙعدÙد Ù
Ù "
"أجÙزة اÙØ£ÙدرÙÙد) تأت٠Ù
ØÙ
ÙØ© ببرÙ
جÙات
تÙÙÙØ°ÙØ© ÙبرÙ
جÙات Øرة اÙÙ
ØµØ¯Ø±Ø ÙÙÙ "
@@ -341,11 +357,16 @@
#. type: Content of: <div><p>
msgid ""
-"The criteria for open source do not recognize this issue; they are concerned "
-"solely with the licensing of the source code. Thus, these unmodifiable "
-"executables, when made from source code such as Linux that is open source "
-"and free, are open source but not free. Many Android products contain "
-"nonfree tivoized executables of Linux."
+"Many Android products contain nonfree tivoized executables of Linux, even "
+"though its source code is under GNU GPL version 2. We designed GNU GPL "
+"version 3 to prohibit this practice."
+msgstr ""
+
+#. type: Content of: <div><p>
+msgid ""
+"The criteria for open source are concerned solely with the licensing of the "
+"source code. Thus, these nonfree executables, when made from source code "
+"such as Linux that is open source and free, are open source but not free."
msgstr ""
#. type: Content of: <div><h3>
Index: po/open-source-misses-the-point.bg.po
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/po/open-source-misses-the-point.bg.po,v
retrieving revision 1.50
retrieving revision 1.51
diff -u -b -r1.50 -r1.51
--- po/open-source-misses-the-point.bg.po 2 Mar 2019 03:30:05 -0000
1.50
+++ po/open-source-misses-the-point.bg.po 28 Apr 2019 11:59:30 -0000
1.51
@@ -7,7 +7,7 @@
msgid ""
msgstr ""
"Project-Id-Version: open-source-misses-the-point.html\n"
-"POT-Creation-Date: 2019-03-02 03:26+0000\n"
+"POT-Creation-Date: 2019-04-28 11:56+0000\n"
"PO-Revision-Date: 2009-10-28 14:55+0200\n"
"Last-Translator: Yavor Doganov <address@hidden>\n"
"Language-Team: Bulgarian <address@hidden>\n"
@@ -286,23 +286,44 @@
#. type: Content of: <div><p>
msgid ""
-"Second, and more important in practice, many products containing computers "
+"Second, when a program's source code carries a weak license, one without "
+"copyleft, its executables can carry additional nonfree conditions. <a href="
+"\"https://code.visualstudio.com/License/\";>Microsoft does this with Visual "
+"Studio,</a> for example."
+msgstr ""
+
+#. type: Content of: <div><p>
+msgid ""
+"If these executables fully correspond to the released sources, they qualify "
+"as open source but not as free software. However, in that case users can "
+"compile the source code to make and distribute free executables."
+msgstr ""
+
+#. type: Content of: <div><p>
+msgid ""
+"Finally, and most important in practice, many products containing computers "
"check signatures on their executable programs to block users from installing "
"different executables; only one privileged company can make executables that "
"can run in the device or can access its full capabilities. We call these "
"devices “tyrants”, and the practice is called “"
"tivoization” after the product (Tivo) where we first saw it. Even if "
-"the executable is made from free source code, the users cannot run modified "
-"versions of it, so the executable is nonfree."
+"the executable is made from free source code, and nominally carries a free "
+"license, the users cannot run modified versions of it, so the executable is "
+"de-facto nonfree."
+msgstr ""
+
+#. type: Content of: <div><p>
+msgid ""
+"Many Android products contain nonfree tivoized executables of Linux, even "
+"though its source code is under GNU GPL version 2. We designed GNU GPL "
+"version 3 to prohibit this practice."
msgstr ""
#. type: Content of: <div><p>
msgid ""
-"The criteria for open source do not recognize this issue; they are concerned "
-"solely with the licensing of the source code. Thus, these unmodifiable "
-"executables, when made from source code such as Linux that is open source "
-"and free, are open source but not free. Many Android products contain "
-"nonfree tivoized executables of Linux."
+"The criteria for open source are concerned solely with the licensing of the "
+"source code. Thus, these nonfree executables, when made from source code "
+"such as Linux that is open source and free, are open source but not free."
msgstr ""
#. type: Content of: <div><h3>
Index: po/open-source-misses-the-point.de-diff.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/po/open-source-misses-the-point.de-diff.html,v
retrieving revision 1.2
retrieving revision 1.3
diff -u -b -r1.2 -r1.3
--- po/open-source-misses-the-point.de-diff.html 21 Apr 2019 10:30:27
-0000 1.2
+++ po/open-source-misses-the-point.de-diff.html 28 Apr 2019 11:59:30
-0000 1.3
@@ -136,21 +136,36 @@
because its license does not allow making a modified version and using
it privately. Fortunately, few programs use such licenses.</p>
-<p>Second, and more important in practice, many products containing
+<p>Second, <span class="inserted"><ins><em>when a program's source code
carries a weak license, one
+without copyleft, its executables can carry additional nonfree
+conditions. <a href="https://code.visualstudio.com/License/">Microsoft
+does this with Visual Studio,</a> for example.</p>
+
+<p>If these executables fully correspond to the released sources, they
+qualify as open source but not as free software. However, in that
+case users can compile the source code to make</em></ins></span> and <span
class="removed"><del><strong>more</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>distribute free
+executables.</p>
+
+<p>Finally, and most</em></ins></span> important in practice, many
products containing
computers check signatures on their executable programs to block users
from installing different executables; only one privileged company can
make executables that can run in the device or can access its full
capabilities. We call these devices “tyrants”, and the
practice is called “tivoization” after the product (Tivo)
where we first saw it. Even if the executable is made from free
-source code, the users cannot run modified versions of it, so the
-executable is nonfree.</p>
+source code, <span class="inserted"><ins><em>and nominally carries a free
license,</em></ins></span> the users cannot
+run modified versions of it, so the executable is <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>de-facto</em></ins></span> nonfree.</p>
-<p>The criteria for open source do not recognize this issue; they are
-concerned solely with the licensing of the source code. Thus, these
-unmodifiable executables, when made from source code such as Linux
-that is open source and free, are open source but not free. Many
-Android products contain nonfree tivoized executables of Linux.</p>
+<span class="inserted"><ins><em><p>Many Android products contain nonfree
tivoized executables of
+Linux, even though its source code is under GNU GPL version 2. We
+designed GNU GPL version 3 to prohibit this
practice.</p></em></ins></span>
+
+<p>The criteria for open source <span class="removed"><del><strong>do
not recognize this issue; they</strong></del></span> are concerned solely with
the
+licensing of the source code. Thus, these
+<span class="removed"><del><strong>unmodifiable</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>nonfree</em></ins></span> executables, when
+made from source code such as Linux that is open source and free, are
+open source but not <span class="removed"><del><strong>free. Many
+Android products contain nonfree tivoized executables of
Linux.</p></strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>free.</p></em></ins></span>
<h3>Common Misunderstandings of “Free Software” and
“Open Source”</h3>
@@ -496,7 +511,7 @@
<p class="unprintable">Updated:
<!-- timestamp start -->
-$Date: 2019/04/21 10:30:27 $
+$Date: 2019/04/28 11:59:30 $
<!-- timestamp end -->
</p>
</div>
Index: po/open-source-misses-the-point.de.po
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/po/open-source-misses-the-point.de.po,v
retrieving revision 1.103
retrieving revision 1.104
diff -u -b -r1.103 -r1.104
--- po/open-source-misses-the-point.de.po 2 Mar 2019 03:30:05 -0000
1.103
+++ po/open-source-misses-the-point.de.po 28 Apr 2019 11:59:30 -0000
1.104
@@ -9,7 +9,7 @@
msgstr ""
"Project-Id-Version: open-source-misses-the-point.html\n"
"Report-Msgid-Bugs-To: address@hidden"
-"POT-Creation-Date: 2019-03-02 03:26+0000\n"
+"POT-Creation-Date: 2019-04-28 11:56+0000\n"
"PO-Revision-Date: 2016-08-08 22:00+0200\n"
"Last-Translator: Jоегg Kоhпе <joeko (AT) online [PUNKT] de>\n"
"Language-Team: German <www-de <address@hidden>\n"
@@ -318,14 +318,51 @@
#. type: Content of: <div><p>
msgid ""
-"Second, and more important in practice, many products containing computers "
+"Second, when a program's source code carries a weak license, one without "
+"copyleft, its executables can carry additional nonfree conditions. <a href="
+"\"https://code.visualstudio.com/License/\";>Microsoft does this with Visual "
+"Studio,</a> for example."
+msgstr ""
+
+#. type: Content of: <div><p>
+msgid ""
+"If these executables fully correspond to the released sources, they qualify "
+"as open source but not as free software. However, in that case users can "
+"compile the source code to make and distribute free executables."
+msgstr ""
+
+#. type: Content of: <div><p>
+# | [-Second,-]{+Finally,+} and [-more-] {+most+} important in practice, many
+# | products containing computers check signatures on their executable
+# | programs to block users from installing different executables; only one
+# | privileged company can make executables that can run in the device or can
+# | access its full capabilities. We call these devices
+# | “tyrants”, and the practice is called
+# | “tivoization” after the product (Tivo) where we first saw it.
+# | Even if the executable is made from free source code, {+and nominally
+# | carries a free license,+} the users cannot run modified versions of it, so
+# | the executable is {+de-facto+} nonfree.
+#, fuzzy
+#| msgid ""
+#| "Second, and more important in practice, many products containing "
+#| "computers check signatures on their executable programs to block users "
+#| "from installing different executables; only one privileged company can "
+#| "make executables that can run in the device or can access its full "
+#| "capabilities. We call these devices “tyrants”, and the "
+#| "practice is called “tivoization” after the product (Tivo) "
+#| "where we first saw it. Even if the executable is made from free source "
+#| "code, the users cannot run modified versions of it, so the executable is "
+#| "nonfree."
+msgid ""
+"Finally, and most important in practice, many products containing computers "
"check signatures on their executable programs to block users from installing "
"different executables; only one privileged company can make executables that "
"can run in the device or can access its full capabilities. We call these "
"devices “tyrants”, and the practice is called “"
"tivoization” after the product (Tivo) where we first saw it. Even if "
-"the executable is made from free source code, the users cannot run modified "
-"versions of it, so the executable is nonfree."
+"the executable is made from free source code, and nominally carries a free "
+"license, the users cannot run modified versions of it, so the executable is "
+"de-facto nonfree."
msgstr ""
"Zweitens ‑ und in der Praxis noch wichtiger ‑"
" prüfen viele Produkte, die rechnergestützt sind, die Signaturen zu "
@@ -341,11 +378,28 @@
#. type: Content of: <div><p>
msgid ""
-"The criteria for open source do not recognize this issue; they are concerned "
-"solely with the licensing of the source code. Thus, these unmodifiable "
-"executables, when made from source code such as Linux that is open source "
-"and free, are open source but not free. Many Android products contain "
-"nonfree tivoized executables of Linux."
+"Many Android products contain nonfree tivoized executables of Linux, even "
+"though its source code is under GNU GPL version 2. We designed GNU GPL "
+"version 3 to prohibit this practice."
+msgstr ""
+
+#. type: Content of: <div><p>
+# | The criteria for open source [-do not recognize this issue; they-] are
+# | concerned solely with the licensing of the source code. Thus, these
+# | [-unmodifiable-] {+nonfree+} executables, when made from source code such
+# | as Linux that is open source and free, are open source but not free.
+# | [-Many Android products contain nonfree tivoized executables of Linux.-]
+#, fuzzy
+#| msgid ""
+#| "The criteria for open source do not recognize this issue; they are "
+#| "concerned solely with the licensing of the source code. Thus, these "
+#| "unmodifiable executables, when made from source code such as Linux that "
+#| "is open source and free, are open source but not free. Many Android "
+#| "products contain nonfree tivoized executables of Linux."
+msgid ""
+"The criteria for open source are concerned solely with the licensing of the "
+"source code. Thus, these nonfree executables, when made from source code "
+"such as Linux that is open source and free, are open source but not free."
msgstr ""
"Die Open-Source-Kriterien erkennen dieses Problem nicht; sie befassen sich "
"einzig mit der Lizenzierung des Quellcodes. Somit sind diese "
Index: po/open-source-misses-the-point.el.po
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/po/open-source-misses-the-point.el.po,v
retrieving revision 1.17
retrieving revision 1.18
diff -u -b -r1.17 -r1.18
--- po/open-source-misses-the-point.el.po 2 Mar 2019 03:30:05 -0000
1.17
+++ po/open-source-misses-the-point.el.po 28 Apr 2019 11:59:30 -0000
1.18
@@ -9,7 +9,7 @@
msgid ""
msgstr ""
"Project-Id-Version: open-source-misses-the-point.html\n"
-"POT-Creation-Date: 2019-03-02 03:26+0000\n"
+"POT-Creation-Date: 2019-04-28 11:56+0000\n"
"PO-Revision-Date: \n"
"Last-Translator: Thérèse Godefroy <godef.th AT free.fr>\n"
"Language-Team: web-translators <address@hidden>\n"
@@ -399,23 +399,44 @@
#. type: Content of: <div><p>
msgid ""
-"Second, and more important in practice, many products containing computers "
+"Second, when a program's source code carries a weak license, one without "
+"copyleft, its executables can carry additional nonfree conditions. <a href="
+"\"https://code.visualstudio.com/License/\";>Microsoft does this with Visual "
+"Studio,</a> for example."
+msgstr ""
+
+#. type: Content of: <div><p>
+msgid ""
+"If these executables fully correspond to the released sources, they qualify "
+"as open source but not as free software. However, in that case users can "
+"compile the source code to make and distribute free executables."
+msgstr ""
+
+#. type: Content of: <div><p>
+msgid ""
+"Finally, and most important in practice, many products containing computers "
"check signatures on their executable programs to block users from installing "
"different executables; only one privileged company can make executables that "
"can run in the device or can access its full capabilities. We call these "
"devices “tyrants”, and the practice is called “"
"tivoization” after the product (Tivo) where we first saw it. Even if "
-"the executable is made from free source code, the users cannot run modified "
-"versions of it, so the executable is nonfree."
+"the executable is made from free source code, and nominally carries a free "
+"license, the users cannot run modified versions of it, so the executable is "
+"de-facto nonfree."
+msgstr ""
+
+#. type: Content of: <div><p>
+msgid ""
+"Many Android products contain nonfree tivoized executables of Linux, even "
+"though its source code is under GNU GPL version 2. We designed GNU GPL "
+"version 3 to prohibit this practice."
msgstr ""
#. type: Content of: <div><p>
msgid ""
-"The criteria for open source do not recognize this issue; they are concerned "
-"solely with the licensing of the source code. Thus, these unmodifiable "
-"executables, when made from source code such as Linux that is open source "
-"and free, are open source but not free. Many Android products contain "
-"nonfree tivoized executables of Linux."
+"The criteria for open source are concerned solely with the licensing of the "
+"source code. Thus, these nonfree executables, when made from source code "
+"such as Linux that is open source and free, are open source but not free."
msgstr ""
#. type: Content of: <div><h3>
Index: po/open-source-misses-the-point.es.po
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/po/open-source-misses-the-point.es.po,v
retrieving revision 1.104
retrieving revision 1.105
diff -u -b -r1.104 -r1.105
--- po/open-source-misses-the-point.es.po 4 Mar 2019 10:49:49 -0000
1.104
+++ po/open-source-misses-the-point.es.po 28 Apr 2019 11:59:30 -0000
1.105
@@ -10,7 +10,7 @@
msgstr ""
"Project-Id-Version: open-source-misses-the-point.html\n"
"Report-Msgid-Bugs-To: \n"
-"POT-Creation-Date: 2019-03-02 03:26+0000\n"
+"POT-Creation-Date: 2019-04-28 11:56+0000\n"
"PO-Revision-Date: \n"
"Last-Translator: Javier Fdez. Retenaga <address@hidden>\n"
"Language-Team: Spanish <address@hidden>\n"
@@ -18,6 +18,7 @@
"MIME-Version: 1.0\n"
"Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8\n"
"Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit\n"
+"X-Outdated-Since: 2019-04-28 11:56+0000\n"
"Plural-Forms: nplurals=2; plural=(n!=1);\n"
"X-Generator: Poedit 1.8.11\n"
@@ -275,14 +276,51 @@
#. type: Content of: <div><p>
msgid ""
-"Second, and more important in practice, many products containing computers "
+"Second, when a program's source code carries a weak license, one without "
+"copyleft, its executables can carry additional nonfree conditions. <a href="
+"\"https://code.visualstudio.com/License/\";>Microsoft does this with Visual "
+"Studio,</a> for example."
+msgstr ""
+
+#. type: Content of: <div><p>
+msgid ""
+"If these executables fully correspond to the released sources, they qualify "
+"as open source but not as free software. However, in that case users can "
+"compile the source code to make and distribute free executables."
+msgstr ""
+
+#. type: Content of: <div><p>
+# | [-Second,-]{+Finally,+} and [-more-] {+most+} important in practice, many
+# | products containing computers check signatures on their executable
+# | programs to block users from installing different executables; only one
+# | privileged company can make executables that can run in the device or can
+# | access its full capabilities. We call these devices
+# | “tyrants”, and the practice is called
+# | “tivoization” after the product (Tivo) where we first saw it.
+# | Even if the executable is made from free source code, {+and nominally
+# | carries a free license,+} the users cannot run modified versions of it, so
+# | the executable is {+de-facto+} nonfree.
+#, fuzzy
+#| msgid ""
+#| "Second, and more important in practice, many products containing "
+#| "computers check signatures on their executable programs to block users "
+#| "from installing different executables; only one privileged company can "
+#| "make executables that can run in the device or can access its full "
+#| "capabilities. We call these devices “tyrants”, and the "
+#| "practice is called “tivoization” after the product (Tivo) "
+#| "where we first saw it. Even if the executable is made from free source "
+#| "code, the users cannot run modified versions of it, so the executable is "
+#| "nonfree."
+msgid ""
+"Finally, and most important in practice, many products containing computers "
"check signatures on their executable programs to block users from installing "
"different executables; only one privileged company can make executables that "
"can run in the device or can access its full capabilities. We call these "
"devices “tyrants”, and the practice is called “"
"tivoization” after the product (Tivo) where we first saw it. Even if "
-"the executable is made from free source code, the users cannot run modified "
-"versions of it, so the executable is nonfree."
+"the executable is made from free source code, and nominally carries a free "
+"license, the users cannot run modified versions of it, so the executable is "
+"de-facto nonfree."
msgstr ""
"En segundo lugar, y lo que en la práctica es más importante, muchos "
"productos que funcionan como ordenadores verifican las firmas de sus "
@@ -297,11 +335,28 @@
#. type: Content of: <div><p>
msgid ""
-"The criteria for open source do not recognize this issue; they are concerned "
-"solely with the licensing of the source code. Thus, these unmodifiable "
-"executables, when made from source code such as Linux that is open source "
-"and free, are open source but not free. Many Android products contain "
-"nonfree tivoized executables of Linux."
+"Many Android products contain nonfree tivoized executables of Linux, even "
+"though its source code is under GNU GPL version 2. We designed GNU GPL "
+"version 3 to prohibit this practice."
+msgstr ""
+
+#. type: Content of: <div><p>
+# | The criteria for open source [-do not recognize this issue; they-] are
+# | concerned solely with the licensing of the source code. Thus, these
+# | [-unmodifiable-] {+nonfree+} executables, when made from source code such
+# | as Linux that is open source and free, are open source but not free.
+# | [-Many Android products contain nonfree tivoized executables of Linux.-]
+#, fuzzy
+#| msgid ""
+#| "The criteria for open source do not recognize this issue; they are "
+#| "concerned solely with the licensing of the source code. Thus, these "
+#| "unmodifiable executables, when made from source code such as Linux that "
+#| "is open source and free, are open source but not free. Many Android "
+#| "products contain nonfree tivoized executables of Linux."
+msgid ""
+"The criteria for open source are concerned solely with the licensing of the "
+"source code. Thus, these nonfree executables, when made from source code "
+"such as Linux that is open source and free, are open source but not free."
msgstr ""
"Los criterios del código abierto no contemplan esta cuestión, solo les "
"interesa la licencia del código fuente. De modo que estos ejecutables no "
Index: po/open-source-misses-the-point.fa.po
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/po/open-source-misses-the-point.fa.po,v
retrieving revision 1.59
retrieving revision 1.60
diff -u -b -r1.59 -r1.60
--- po/open-source-misses-the-point.fa.po 2 Mar 2019 03:30:05 -0000
1.59
+++ po/open-source-misses-the-point.fa.po 28 Apr 2019 11:59:30 -0000
1.60
@@ -9,7 +9,7 @@
msgid ""
msgstr ""
"Project-Id-Version: open-source-misses-the-point.html\n"
-"POT-Creation-Date: 2019-03-02 03:26+0000\n"
+"POT-Creation-Date: 2019-04-28 11:56+0000\n"
"PO-Revision-Date: 2011-01-16 23:22+0330\n"
"Last-Translator: Mahyar Moghimi <address@hidden>\n"
"Language-Team: Persian <address@hidden>\n"
@@ -277,23 +277,44 @@
#. type: Content of: <div><p>
msgid ""
-"Second, and more important in practice, many products containing computers "
+"Second, when a program's source code carries a weak license, one without "
+"copyleft, its executables can carry additional nonfree conditions. <a href="
+"\"https://code.visualstudio.com/License/\";>Microsoft does this with Visual "
+"Studio,</a> for example."
+msgstr ""
+
+#. type: Content of: <div><p>
+msgid ""
+"If these executables fully correspond to the released sources, they qualify "
+"as open source but not as free software. However, in that case users can "
+"compile the source code to make and distribute free executables."
+msgstr ""
+
+#. type: Content of: <div><p>
+msgid ""
+"Finally, and most important in practice, many products containing computers "
"check signatures on their executable programs to block users from installing "
"different executables; only one privileged company can make executables that "
"can run in the device or can access its full capabilities. We call these "
"devices “tyrants”, and the practice is called “"
"tivoization” after the product (Tivo) where we first saw it. Even if "
-"the executable is made from free source code, the users cannot run modified "
-"versions of it, so the executable is nonfree."
+"the executable is made from free source code, and nominally carries a free "
+"license, the users cannot run modified versions of it, so the executable is "
+"de-facto nonfree."
+msgstr ""
+
+#. type: Content of: <div><p>
+msgid ""
+"Many Android products contain nonfree tivoized executables of Linux, even "
+"though its source code is under GNU GPL version 2. We designed GNU GPL "
+"version 3 to prohibit this practice."
msgstr ""
#. type: Content of: <div><p>
msgid ""
-"The criteria for open source do not recognize this issue; they are concerned "
-"solely with the licensing of the source code. Thus, these unmodifiable "
-"executables, when made from source code such as Linux that is open source "
-"and free, are open source but not free. Many Android products contain "
-"nonfree tivoized executables of Linux."
+"The criteria for open source are concerned solely with the licensing of the "
+"source code. Thus, these nonfree executables, when made from source code "
+"such as Linux that is open source and free, are open source but not free."
msgstr ""
#. type: Content of: <div><h3>
Index: po/open-source-misses-the-point.fr.po
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/po/open-source-misses-the-point.fr.po,v
retrieving revision 1.104
retrieving revision 1.105
diff -u -b -r1.104 -r1.105
--- po/open-source-misses-the-point.fr.po 2 Mar 2019 12:57:29 -0000
1.104
+++ po/open-source-misses-the-point.fr.po 28 Apr 2019 11:59:30 -0000
1.105
@@ -9,7 +9,7 @@
msgid ""
msgstr ""
"Project-Id-Version: open-source-misses-the-point.html\n"
-"POT-Creation-Date: 2019-03-02 03:26+0000\n"
+"POT-Creation-Date: 2019-04-28 11:56+0000\n"
"PO-Revision-Date: 2019-03-02 13:56+0100\n"
"Last-Translator: Thérèse Godefroy <godef.th AT free.fr>\n"
"Language-Team: French <address@hidden>\n"
@@ -17,6 +17,7 @@
"MIME-Version: 1.0\n"
"Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8\n"
"Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit\n"
+"X-Outdated-Since: 2019-04-28 11:56+0000\n"
"Plural-Forms: \n"
"X-Generator: Gtranslator 2.91.5\n"
@@ -276,14 +277,51 @@
#. type: Content of: <div><p>
msgid ""
-"Second, and more important in practice, many products containing computers "
+"Second, when a program's source code carries a weak license, one without "
+"copyleft, its executables can carry additional nonfree conditions. <a href="
+"\"https://code.visualstudio.com/License/\";>Microsoft does this with Visual "
+"Studio,</a> for example."
+msgstr ""
+
+#. type: Content of: <div><p>
+msgid ""
+"If these executables fully correspond to the released sources, they qualify "
+"as open source but not as free software. However, in that case users can "
+"compile the source code to make and distribute free executables."
+msgstr ""
+
+#. type: Content of: <div><p>
+# | [-Second,-]{+Finally,+} and [-more-] {+most+} important in practice, many
+# | products containing computers check signatures on their executable
+# | programs to block users from installing different executables; only one
+# | privileged company can make executables that can run in the device or can
+# | access its full capabilities. We call these devices
+# | “tyrants”, and the practice is called
+# | “tivoization” after the product (Tivo) where we first saw it.
+# | Even if the executable is made from free source code, {+and nominally
+# | carries a free license,+} the users cannot run modified versions of it, so
+# | the executable is {+de-facto+} nonfree.
+#, fuzzy
+#| msgid ""
+#| "Second, and more important in practice, many products containing "
+#| "computers check signatures on their executable programs to block users "
+#| "from installing different executables; only one privileged company can "
+#| "make executables that can run in the device or can access its full "
+#| "capabilities. We call these devices “tyrants”, and the "
+#| "practice is called “tivoization” after the product (Tivo) "
+#| "where we first saw it. Even if the executable is made from free source "
+#| "code, the users cannot run modified versions of it, so the executable is "
+#| "nonfree."
+msgid ""
+"Finally, and most important in practice, many products containing computers "
"check signatures on their executable programs to block users from installing "
"different executables; only one privileged company can make executables that "
"can run in the device or can access its full capabilities. We call these "
"devices “tyrants”, and the practice is called “"
"tivoization” after the product (Tivo) where we first saw it. Even if "
-"the executable is made from free source code, the users cannot run modified "
-"versions of it, so the executable is nonfree."
+"the executable is made from free source code, and nominally carries a free "
+"license, the users cannot run modified versions of it, so the executable is "
+"de-facto nonfree."
msgstr ""
"Plus important encore en pratique, beaucoup de produits embarquant des "
"ordinateurs vérifient les signatures de leurs programmes exécutables de "
@@ -298,11 +336,28 @@
#. type: Content of: <div><p>
msgid ""
-"The criteria for open source do not recognize this issue; they are concerned "
-"solely with the licensing of the source code. Thus, these unmodifiable "
-"executables, when made from source code such as Linux that is open source "
-"and free, are open source but not free. Many Android products contain "
-"nonfree tivoized executables of Linux."
+"Many Android products contain nonfree tivoized executables of Linux, even "
+"though its source code is under GNU GPL version 2. We designed GNU GPL "
+"version 3 to prohibit this practice."
+msgstr ""
+
+#. type: Content of: <div><p>
+# | The criteria for open source [-do not recognize this issue; they-] are
+# | concerned solely with the licensing of the source code. Thus, these
+# | [-unmodifiable-] {+nonfree+} executables, when made from source code such
+# | as Linux that is open source and free, are open source but not free.
+# | [-Many Android products contain nonfree tivoized executables of Linux.-]
+#, fuzzy
+#| msgid ""
+#| "The criteria for open source do not recognize this issue; they are "
+#| "concerned solely with the licensing of the source code. Thus, these "
+#| "unmodifiable executables, when made from source code such as Linux that "
+#| "is open source and free, are open source but not free. Many Android "
+#| "products contain nonfree tivoized executables of Linux."
+msgid ""
+"The criteria for open source are concerned solely with the licensing of the "
+"source code. Thus, these nonfree executables, when made from source code "
+"such as Linux that is open source and free, are open source but not free."
msgstr ""
"Les critères de l'open source ne tiennent pas compte de ce problème ; ils "
"s'intéressent uniquement à la licence du code source. Par conséquent ces "
Index: po/open-source-misses-the-point.hr-diff.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/po/open-source-misses-the-point.hr-diff.html,v
retrieving revision 1.16
retrieving revision 1.17
diff -u -b -r1.16 -r1.17
--- po/open-source-misses-the-point.hr-diff.html 2 Mar 2019 03:30:05
-0000 1.16
+++ po/open-source-misses-the-point.hr-diff.html 28 Apr 2019 11:59:30
-0000 1.17
@@ -136,26 +136,38 @@
because its license does not allow making a modified version and using
it privately.</em></ins></span> Fortunately, few programs use <span
class="removed"><del><strong>those</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>such</em></ins></span> licenses.</p>
-<p>Second, and more <span
class="removed"><del><strong>important,</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>important in practice,</em></ins></span> many
products containing
-computers
-<span class="removed"><del><strong>(including many Android devices) come
with</strong></del></span> <span class="inserted"><ins><em>check signatures on
their</em></ins></span> executable programs <span
class="removed"><del><strong>that
-correspond</strong></del></span> to <span class="removed"><del><strong>free
software source code, but the devices do not allow
-the user to install modified versions of those</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>block users
+<p>Second, <span class="removed"><del><strong>and more important, many
products containing computers
+(including many Android devices) come</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>when a program's source code carries a weak license,
one
+without copyleft, its executables can carry additional nonfree
+conditions. <a href="https://code.visualstudio.com/License/">Microsoft
+does this</em></ins></span> with <span class="removed"><del><strong>executable
programs that</strong></del></span> <span class="inserted"><ins><em>Visual
Studio,</a> for example.</p>
+
+<p>If these executables fully</em></ins></span> correspond to <span
class="removed"><del><strong>free software</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>the released sources, they
+qualify as open</em></ins></span> source <span
class="removed"><del><strong>code,</strong></del></span> but <span
class="removed"><del><strong>the devices do</strong></del></span> not <span
class="removed"><del><strong>allow</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>as free software. However, in that
+case users can compile</em></ins></span> the <span
class="removed"><del><strong>user</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>source code</em></ins></span> to <span
class="removed"><del><strong>install modified versions of
those</strong></del></span> <span class="inserted"><ins><em>make and distribute
free
+executables.</p>
+
+<p>Finally, and most important in practice, many products containing
+computers check signatures on their executable programs to block users
from installing different</em></ins></span> executables; only one
<span class="removed"><del><strong>special</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>privileged</em></ins></span> company <span
class="removed"><del><strong>has</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>can
make executables that can run in</em></ins></span> the <span
class="removed"><del><strong>power to modify them.</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>device or can access its full
capabilities.</em></ins></span> We call these devices “tyrants”,
and the
practice is called “tivoization” after the product <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>(Tivo)</em></ins></span>
where we first saw it.
-<span class="removed"><del><strong>These executables are
not</strong></del></span> <span class="inserted"><ins><em>Even if the
executable is made from</em></ins></span> free <span
class="removed"><del><strong>software even though their</strong></del></span>
-source <span class="removed"><del><strong>code</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>code, the users cannot run modified versions of it,
so the
-executable</em></ins></span> is <span class="removed"><del><strong>free
software. The</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>nonfree.</p>
-
-<p>The</em></ins></span> criteria for open source do not recognize this
issue; they are
-concerned solely with the licensing of the source <span
class="removed"><del><strong>code.</p></strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>code. Thus, these
-unmodifiable executables, when made from source code such as Linux
-that is open source and free, are open source but not free. Many
-Android products contain nonfree tivoized executables of
Linux.</p></em></ins></span>
+<span class="removed"><del><strong>These executables are
not</strong></del></span> <span class="inserted"><ins><em>Even if the
executable is made from</em></ins></span> free <span
class="removed"><del><strong>software</strong></del></span>
+<span class="inserted"><ins><em>source code, and nominally carries a free
license, the users cannot
+run modified versions of it, so the executable is de-facto nonfree.</p>
+
+<p>Many Android products contain nonfree tivoized executables of
+Linux,</em></ins></span> even though <span
class="removed"><del><strong>their</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>its</em></ins></span> source code is <span
class="removed"><del><strong>free software. The</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>under GNU GPL version 2. We
+designed GNU GPL version 3 to prohibit this practice.</p>
+
+<p>The</em></ins></span> criteria for open source <span
class="removed"><del><strong>do not recognize this
+issue; they</strong></del></span> are concerned solely with the
+licensing of the source <span
class="removed"><del><strong>code.</p></strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>code. Thus, these nonfree executables, when
+made from source code such as Linux that is open source and free, are
+open source but not free.</p></em></ins></span>
<h3>Common Misunderstandings of “Free Software” and
“Open Source”</h3>
@@ -507,7 +519,7 @@
<p class="unprintable">Updated:
<!-- timestamp start -->
-$Date: 2019/03/02 03:30:05 $
+$Date: 2019/04/28 11:59:30 $
<!-- timestamp end -->
</p>
</div>
Index: po/open-source-misses-the-point.hr.po
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/po/open-source-misses-the-point.hr.po,v
retrieving revision 1.35
retrieving revision 1.36
diff -u -b -r1.35 -r1.36
--- po/open-source-misses-the-point.hr.po 2 Mar 2019 03:30:05 -0000
1.35
+++ po/open-source-misses-the-point.hr.po 28 Apr 2019 11:59:30 -0000
1.36
@@ -7,7 +7,7 @@
msgid ""
msgstr ""
"Project-Id-Version: open-source-misses-the-point.html\n"
-"POT-Creation-Date: 2019-03-02 03:26+0000\n"
+"POT-Creation-Date: 2019-04-28 11:56+0000\n"
"PO-Revision-Date: 2014-02-06 22:11+0100\n"
"Last-Translator: Martina Bebek <address@hidden>\n"
"Language-Team: GNU Croatian Translation Team <address@hidden>\n"
@@ -326,22 +326,37 @@
"slobodne licence. SreÄom, samo nekoliko programa koristi te licence."
#. type: Content of: <div><p>
-# | Second, and more [-important,-] {+important in practice,+} many products
-# | containing computers [-(including many Android devices) come with-]
-# | {+check signatures on their+} executable programs [-that correspond-] to
-# | [-free software source code, but the devices do not allow the user to
-# | install modified versions of those-] {+block users from installing
-# | different+} executables; only one [-special-] {+privileged+} company [-has
-# | the power to modify them.-] {+can make executables that can run in the
-# | device or can access its full capabilities.+} We call these devices
-# | “tyrants”, and the practice is called
-# | “tivoization” after the product {+(Tivo)+} where we first saw
-# | it. [-These executables are not free software even though their source
-# | code-] {+Even if the executable+} is {+made from+} free [-software. The
-# | criteria for open-] source [-do not recognize this issue; they are
-# | concerned solely with-] {+code,+} the [-licensing-] {+users cannot run
-# | modified versions+} of {+it, so+} the [-source code.-] {+executable is
-# | nonfree.+}
+msgid ""
+"Second, when a program's source code carries a weak license, one without "
+"copyleft, its executables can carry additional nonfree conditions. <a href="
+"\"https://code.visualstudio.com/License/\";>Microsoft does this with Visual "
+"Studio,</a> for example."
+msgstr ""
+
+#. type: Content of: <div><p>
+msgid ""
+"If these executables fully correspond to the released sources, they qualify "
+"as open source but not as free software. However, in that case users can "
+"compile the source code to make and distribute free executables."
+msgstr ""
+
+#. type: Content of: <div><p>
+# | [-Second,-]{+Finally,+} and [-more important,-] {+most important in
+# | practice,+} many products containing computers [-(including many Android
+# | devices) come with-] {+check signatures on their+} executable programs
+# | [-that correspond to free software source code, but the devices do not
+# | allow the user-] to [-install modified versions of those-] {+block users
+# | from installing different+} executables; only one [-special-]
+# | {+privileged+} company [-has the power to modify them.-] {+can make
+# | executables that can run in the device or can access its full
+# | capabilities.+} We call these devices “tyrants”, and the
+# | practice is called “tivoization” after the product {+(Tivo)+}
+# | where we first saw it. [-These executables are not free software even
+# | though their source code-] {+Even if the executable+} is {+made from+}
+# | free [-software. The criteria for open-] source [-do not recognize this
+# | issue; they are concerned solely with-] {+code, and nominally carries a
+# | free license,+} the [-licensing-] {+users cannot run modified versions+}
+# | of {+it, so+} the [-source code.-] {+executable is de-facto nonfree.+}
#, fuzzy
#| msgid ""
#| "Second, and more important, many products containing computers (including "
@@ -355,14 +370,15 @@
#| "for open source do not recognize this issue; they are concerned solely "
#| "with the licensing of the source code."
msgid ""
-"Second, and more important in practice, many products containing computers "
+"Finally, and most important in practice, many products containing computers "
"check signatures on their executable programs to block users from installing "
"different executables; only one privileged company can make executables that "
"can run in the device or can access its full capabilities. We call these "
"devices “tyrants”, and the practice is called “"
"tivoization” after the product (Tivo) where we first saw it. Even if "
-"the executable is made from free source code, the users cannot run modified "
-"versions of it, so the executable is nonfree."
+"the executable is made from free source code, and nominally carries a free "
+"license, the users cannot run modified versions of it, so the executable is "
+"de-facto nonfree."
msgstr ""
"Drugo, važnije, mnogi proizvodi koji sadrže raÄunala (ukljuÄujuÄi mnoge "
"Android ureÄaje) dolaze sa izvrÅ¡nim programima koji odgovaraju izvornom
kodu "
@@ -376,11 +392,16 @@
#. type: Content of: <div><p>
msgid ""
-"The criteria for open source do not recognize this issue; they are concerned "
-"solely with the licensing of the source code. Thus, these unmodifiable "
-"executables, when made from source code such as Linux that is open source "
-"and free, are open source but not free. Many Android products contain "
-"nonfree tivoized executables of Linux."
+"Many Android products contain nonfree tivoized executables of Linux, even "
+"though its source code is under GNU GPL version 2. We designed GNU GPL "
+"version 3 to prohibit this practice."
+msgstr ""
+
+#. type: Content of: <div><p>
+msgid ""
+"The criteria for open source are concerned solely with the licensing of the "
+"source code. Thus, these nonfree executables, when made from source code "
+"such as Linux that is open source and free, are open source but not free."
msgstr ""
#. type: Content of: <div><h3>
Index: po/open-source-misses-the-point.it-diff.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/po/open-source-misses-the-point.it-diff.html,v
retrieving revision 1.1
retrieving revision 1.2
diff -u -b -r1.1 -r1.2
--- po/open-source-misses-the-point.it-diff.html 21 Apr 2019 10:30:27
-0000 1.1
+++ po/open-source-misses-the-point.it-diff.html 28 Apr 2019 11:59:30
-0000 1.2
@@ -136,21 +136,36 @@
because its license does not allow making a modified version and using
it privately. Fortunately, few programs use such licenses.</p>
-<p>Second, and more important in practice, many products containing
+<p>Second, <span class="inserted"><ins><em>when a program's source code
carries a weak license, one
+without copyleft, its executables can carry additional nonfree
+conditions. <a href="https://code.visualstudio.com/License/">Microsoft
+does this with Visual Studio,</a> for example.</p>
+
+<p>If these executables fully correspond to the released sources, they
+qualify as open source but not as free software. However, in that
+case users can compile the source code to make</em></ins></span> and <span
class="removed"><del><strong>more</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>distribute free
+executables.</p>
+
+<p>Finally, and most</em></ins></span> important in practice, many
products containing
computers check signatures on their executable programs to block users
from installing different executables; only one privileged company can
make executables that can run in the device or can access its full
capabilities. We call these devices “tyrants”, and the
practice is called “tivoization” after the product (Tivo)
where we first saw it. Even if the executable is made from free
-source code, the users cannot run modified versions of it, so the
-executable is nonfree.</p>
+source code, <span class="inserted"><ins><em>and nominally carries a free
license,</em></ins></span> the users cannot
+run modified versions of it, so the executable is <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>de-facto</em></ins></span> nonfree.</p>
-<p>The criteria for open source do not recognize this issue; they are
-concerned solely with the licensing of the source code. Thus, these
-unmodifiable executables, when made from source code such as Linux
-that is open source and free, are open source but not free. Many
-Android products contain nonfree tivoized executables of Linux.</p>
+<span class="inserted"><ins><em><p>Many Android products contain nonfree
tivoized executables of
+Linux, even though its source code is under GNU GPL version 2. We
+designed GNU GPL version 3 to prohibit this
practice.</p></em></ins></span>
+
+<p>The criteria for open source <span class="removed"><del><strong>do
not recognize this issue; they</strong></del></span> are concerned solely with
the
+licensing of the source code. Thus, these
+<span class="removed"><del><strong>unmodifiable</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>nonfree</em></ins></span> executables, when
+made from source code such as Linux that is open source and free, are
+open source but not <span class="removed"><del><strong>free. Many
+Android products contain nonfree tivoized executables of
Linux.</p></strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>free.</p></em></ins></span>
<h3>Common Misunderstandings of “Free Software” and
“Open Source”</h3>
@@ -496,7 +511,7 @@
<p class="unprintable">Updated:
<!-- timestamp start -->
-$Date: 2019/04/21 10:30:27 $
+$Date: 2019/04/28 11:59:30 $
<!-- timestamp end -->
</p>
</div>
Index: po/open-source-misses-the-point.it.po
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/po/open-source-misses-the-point.it.po,v
retrieving revision 1.77
retrieving revision 1.78
diff -u -b -r1.77 -r1.78
--- po/open-source-misses-the-point.it.po 2 Mar 2019 03:30:05 -0000
1.77
+++ po/open-source-misses-the-point.it.po 28 Apr 2019 11:59:30 -0000
1.78
@@ -7,7 +7,7 @@
msgid ""
msgstr ""
"Project-Id-Version: open-source-misses-the-point.html\n"
-"POT-Creation-Date: 2019-03-02 03:26+0000\n"
+"POT-Creation-Date: 2019-04-28 11:56+0000\n"
"PO-Revision-Date: 2016-07-30 17:23+0100\n"
"Last-Translator: Andrea Pescetti <address@hidden>\n"
"Language-Team: Italian\n"
@@ -319,14 +319,51 @@
#. type: Content of: <div><p>
msgid ""
-"Second, and more important in practice, many products containing computers "
+"Second, when a program's source code carries a weak license, one without "
+"copyleft, its executables can carry additional nonfree conditions. <a href="
+"\"https://code.visualstudio.com/License/\";>Microsoft does this with Visual "
+"Studio,</a> for example."
+msgstr ""
+
+#. type: Content of: <div><p>
+msgid ""
+"If these executables fully correspond to the released sources, they qualify "
+"as open source but not as free software. However, in that case users can "
+"compile the source code to make and distribute free executables."
+msgstr ""
+
+#. type: Content of: <div><p>
+# | [-Second,-]{+Finally,+} and [-more-] {+most+} important in practice, many
+# | products containing computers check signatures on their executable
+# | programs to block users from installing different executables; only one
+# | privileged company can make executables that can run in the device or can
+# | access its full capabilities. We call these devices
+# | “tyrants”, and the practice is called
+# | “tivoization” after the product (Tivo) where we first saw it.
+# | Even if the executable is made from free source code, {+and nominally
+# | carries a free license,+} the users cannot run modified versions of it, so
+# | the executable is {+de-facto+} nonfree.
+#, fuzzy
+#| msgid ""
+#| "Second, and more important in practice, many products containing "
+#| "computers check signatures on their executable programs to block users "
+#| "from installing different executables; only one privileged company can "
+#| "make executables that can run in the device or can access its full "
+#| "capabilities. We call these devices “tyrants”, and the "
+#| "practice is called “tivoization” after the product (Tivo) "
+#| "where we first saw it. Even if the executable is made from free source "
+#| "code, the users cannot run modified versions of it, so the executable is "
+#| "nonfree."
+msgid ""
+"Finally, and most important in practice, many products containing computers "
"check signatures on their executable programs to block users from installing "
"different executables; only one privileged company can make executables that "
"can run in the device or can access its full capabilities. We call these "
"devices “tyrants”, and the practice is called “"
"tivoization” after the product (Tivo) where we first saw it. Even if "
-"the executable is made from free source code, the users cannot run modified "
-"versions of it, so the executable is nonfree."
+"the executable is made from free source code, and nominally carries a free "
+"license, the users cannot run modified versions of it, so the executable is "
+"de-facto nonfree."
msgstr ""
"E poi, e questo è più importante in pratica, molti prodotti che contengono "
"computer controllano l'integrità dei loro programmi eseguibili per impedire "
@@ -340,11 +377,28 @@
#. type: Content of: <div><p>
msgid ""
-"The criteria for open source do not recognize this issue; they are concerned "
-"solely with the licensing of the source code. Thus, these unmodifiable "
-"executables, when made from source code such as Linux that is open source "
-"and free, are open source but not free. Many Android products contain "
-"nonfree tivoized executables of Linux."
+"Many Android products contain nonfree tivoized executables of Linux, even "
+"though its source code is under GNU GPL version 2. We designed GNU GPL "
+"version 3 to prohibit this practice."
+msgstr ""
+
+#. type: Content of: <div><p>
+# | The criteria for open source [-do not recognize this issue; they-] are
+# | concerned solely with the licensing of the source code. Thus, these
+# | [-unmodifiable-] {+nonfree+} executables, when made from source code such
+# | as Linux that is open source and free, are open source but not free.
+# | [-Many Android products contain nonfree tivoized executables of Linux.-]
+#, fuzzy
+#| msgid ""
+#| "The criteria for open source do not recognize this issue; they are "
+#| "concerned solely with the licensing of the source code. Thus, these "
+#| "unmodifiable executables, when made from source code such as Linux that "
+#| "is open source and free, are open source but not free. Many Android "
+#| "products contain nonfree tivoized executables of Linux."
+msgid ""
+"The criteria for open source are concerned solely with the licensing of the "
+"source code. Thus, these nonfree executables, when made from source code "
+"such as Linux that is open source and free, are open source but not free."
msgstr ""
"I criteri per l'open source non riconoscono questo problema; guardano "
"solamente la licenza del codice sorgente. Quindi questi eseguibili non "
Index: po/open-source-misses-the-point.ja-diff.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/po/open-source-misses-the-point.ja-diff.html,v
retrieving revision 1.1
retrieving revision 1.2
diff -u -b -r1.1 -r1.2
--- po/open-source-misses-the-point.ja-diff.html 21 Apr 2019 10:30:27
-0000 1.1
+++ po/open-source-misses-the-point.ja-diff.html 28 Apr 2019 11:59:30
-0000 1.2
@@ -136,21 +136,36 @@
because its license does not allow making a modified version and using
it privately. Fortunately, few programs use such licenses.</p>
-<p>Second, and more important in practice, many products containing
+<p>Second, <span class="inserted"><ins><em>when a program's source code
carries a weak license, one
+without copyleft, its executables can carry additional nonfree
+conditions. <a href="https://code.visualstudio.com/License/">Microsoft
+does this with Visual Studio,</a> for example.</p>
+
+<p>If these executables fully correspond to the released sources, they
+qualify as open source but not as free software. However, in that
+case users can compile the source code to make</em></ins></span> and <span
class="removed"><del><strong>more</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>distribute free
+executables.</p>
+
+<p>Finally, and most</em></ins></span> important in practice, many
products containing
computers check signatures on their executable programs to block users
from installing different executables; only one privileged company can
make executables that can run in the device or can access its full
capabilities. We call these devices “tyrants”, and the
practice is called “tivoization” after the product (Tivo)
where we first saw it. Even if the executable is made from free
-source code, the users cannot run modified versions of it, so the
-executable is nonfree.</p>
+source code, <span class="inserted"><ins><em>and nominally carries a free
license,</em></ins></span> the users cannot
+run modified versions of it, so the executable is <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>de-facto</em></ins></span> nonfree.</p>
-<p>The criteria for open source do not recognize this issue; they are
-concerned solely with the licensing of the source code. Thus, these
-unmodifiable executables, when made from source code such as Linux
-that is open source and free, are open source but not free. Many
-Android products contain nonfree tivoized executables of Linux.</p>
+<span class="inserted"><ins><em><p>Many Android products contain nonfree
tivoized executables of
+Linux, even though its source code is under GNU GPL version 2. We
+designed GNU GPL version 3 to prohibit this
practice.</p></em></ins></span>
+
+<p>The criteria for open source <span class="removed"><del><strong>do
not recognize this issue; they</strong></del></span> are concerned solely with
the
+licensing of the source code. Thus, these
+<span class="removed"><del><strong>unmodifiable</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>nonfree</em></ins></span> executables, when
+made from source code such as Linux that is open source and free, are
+open source but not <span class="removed"><del><strong>free. Many
+Android products contain nonfree tivoized executables of
Linux.</p></strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>free.</p></em></ins></span>
<h3>Common Misunderstandings of “Free Software” and
“Open Source”</h3>
@@ -496,7 +511,7 @@
<p class="unprintable">Updated:
<!-- timestamp start -->
-$Date: 2019/04/21 10:30:27 $
+$Date: 2019/04/28 11:59:30 $
<!-- timestamp end -->
</p>
</div>
Index: po/open-source-misses-the-point.ja.po
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/po/open-source-misses-the-point.ja.po,v
retrieving revision 1.73
retrieving revision 1.74
diff -u -b -r1.73 -r1.74
--- po/open-source-misses-the-point.ja.po 2 Mar 2019 03:30:05 -0000
1.73
+++ po/open-source-misses-the-point.ja.po 28 Apr 2019 11:59:30 -0000
1.74
@@ -6,7 +6,7 @@
msgid ""
msgstr ""
"Project-Id-Version: open-source-misses-the-point.html\n"
-"POT-Creation-Date: 2019-03-02 03:26+0000\n"
+"POT-Creation-Date: 2019-04-28 11:56+0000\n"
"PO-Revision-Date: 2017-01-17 16:07+0900\n"
"Last-Translator: NIIBE Yutaka <address@hidden>\n"
"Language-Team: Japanese <address@hidden>\n"
@@ -274,14 +274,41 @@
#. type: Content of: <div><p>
msgid ""
-"Second, and more important in practice, many products containing computers "
+"Second, when a program's source code carries a weak license, one without "
+"copyleft, its executables can carry additional nonfree conditions. <a href="
+"\"https://code.visualstudio.com/License/\";>Microsoft does this with Visual "
+"Studio,</a> for example."
+msgstr ""
+
+#. type: Content of: <div><p>
+msgid ""
+"If these executables fully correspond to the released sources, they qualify "
+"as open source but not as free software. However, in that case users can "
+"compile the source code to make and distribute free executables."
+msgstr ""
+
+#. type: Content of: <div><p>
+#, fuzzy
+#| msgid ""
+#| "Second, and more important in practice, many products containing "
+#| "computers check signatures on their executable programs to block users "
+#| "from installing different executables; only one privileged company can "
+#| "make executables that can run in the device or can access its full "
+#| "capabilities. We call these devices “tyrants”, and the "
+#| "practice is called “tivoization” after the product (Tivo) "
+#| "where we first saw it. Even if the executable is made from free source "
+#| "code, the users cannot run modified versions of it, so the executable is "
+#| "nonfree."
+msgid ""
+"Finally, and most important in practice, many products containing computers "
"check signatures on their executable programs to block users from installing "
"different executables; only one privileged company can make executables that "
"can run in the device or can access its full capabilities. We call these "
"devices “tyrants”, and the practice is called “"
"tivoization” after the product (Tivo) where we first saw it. Even if "
-"the executable is made from free source code, the users cannot run modified "
-"versions of it, so the executable is nonfree."
+"the executable is made from free source code, and nominally carries a free "
+"license, the users cannot run modified versions of it, so the executable is "
+"de-facto nonfree."
msgstr ""
"第äºã«ãå®éã«ã¯ããã£ã¨éè¦ãªã®ã§ãããå¤ãã®ã³ã³ãã¥ã¼ã¿ãå
èµãã製åã¯ã"
"å®è¡ããã°ã©ã
ã®é»åç½²åããã§ãã¯ããã¦ã¼ã¶ãç°ãªãå®è¡å½¢å¼ãã¤ã³ã¹ãã¼ã«ã§"
@@ -294,11 +321,23 @@
#. type: Content of: <div><p>
msgid ""
-"The criteria for open source do not recognize this issue; they are concerned "
-"solely with the licensing of the source code. Thus, these unmodifiable "
-"executables, when made from source code such as Linux that is open source "
-"and free, are open source but not free. Many Android products contain "
-"nonfree tivoized executables of Linux."
+"Many Android products contain nonfree tivoized executables of Linux, even "
+"though its source code is under GNU GPL version 2. We designed GNU GPL "
+"version 3 to prohibit this practice."
+msgstr ""
+
+#. type: Content of: <div><p>
+#, fuzzy
+#| msgid ""
+#| "The criteria for open source do not recognize this issue; they are "
+#| "concerned solely with the licensing of the source code. Thus, these "
+#| "unmodifiable executables, when made from source code such as Linux that "
+#| "is open source and free, are open source but not free. Many Android "
+#| "products contain nonfree tivoized executables of Linux."
+msgid ""
+"The criteria for open source are concerned solely with the licensing of the "
+"source code. Thus, these nonfree executables, when made from source code "
+"such as Linux that is open source and free, are open source but not free."
msgstr ""
"ãªã¼ãã³ã½ã¼ã¹ã®åºæºã¯ãã®åé¡ãèªèãã¾ãããã½ã¼ã¹ã³ã¼ãã®ã©ã¤ã»ã³ã·ã³ã°ã«"
"ã¤ãã¦ã
ããé¢ä¸ãã¾ããã§ãããããããã£ãå¤æ´ã§ããªãå®è¡å½¢å¼ã¯ãLinuxã®ã"
Index: po/open-source-misses-the-point.lt-diff.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/po/open-source-misses-the-point.lt-diff.html,v
retrieving revision 1.7
retrieving revision 1.8
diff -u -b -r1.7 -r1.8
--- po/open-source-misses-the-point.lt-diff.html 2 Mar 2019 03:30:05
-0000 1.7
+++ po/open-source-misses-the-point.lt-diff.html 28 Apr 2019 11:59:30
-0000 1.8
@@ -136,21 +136,36 @@
because its license does not allow making a modified version and using
it privately. Fortunately, few programs use such licenses.</p>
-<p>Second, and more important in practice, many products containing
+<p>Second, <span class="inserted"><ins><em>when a program's source code
carries a weak license, one
+without copyleft, its executables can carry additional nonfree
+conditions. <a href="https://code.visualstudio.com/License/">Microsoft
+does this with Visual Studio,</a> for example.</p>
+
+<p>If these executables fully correspond to the released sources, they
+qualify as open source but not as free software. However, in that
+case users can compile the source code to make</em></ins></span> and <span
class="removed"><del><strong>more</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>distribute free
+executables.</p>
+
+<p>Finally, and most</em></ins></span> important in practice, many
products containing
computers check signatures on their executable programs to block users
from installing different executables; only one privileged company can
make executables that can run in the device or can access its full
capabilities. We call these devices “tyrants”, and the
practice is called “tivoization” after the product (Tivo)
where we first saw it. Even if the executable is made from free
-source code, the users cannot run modified versions of it, so the
-executable is nonfree.</p>
+source code, <span class="inserted"><ins><em>and nominally carries a free
license,</em></ins></span> the users cannot
+run modified versions of it, so the executable is <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>de-facto</em></ins></span> nonfree.</p>
-<p>The criteria for open source do not recognize this issue; they are
-concerned solely with the licensing of the source code. Thus, these
-unmodifiable executables, when made from source code such as Linux
-that is open source and free, are open source but not free. Many
-Android products contain nonfree tivoized executables of Linux.</p>
+<span class="inserted"><ins><em><p>Many Android products contain nonfree
tivoized executables of
+Linux, even though its source code is under GNU GPL version 2. We
+designed GNU GPL version 3 to prohibit this
practice.</p></em></ins></span>
+
+<p>The criteria for open source <span class="removed"><del><strong>do
not recognize this issue; they</strong></del></span> are concerned solely with
the
+licensing of the source code. Thus, these
+<span class="removed"><del><strong>unmodifiable</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>nonfree</em></ins></span> executables, when
+made from source code such as Linux that is open source and free, are
+open source but not <span class="removed"><del><strong>free. Many
+Android products contain nonfree tivoized executables of
Linux.</p></strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>free.</p></em></ins></span>
<h3>Common Misunderstandings of “Free Software” and
“Open Source”</h3>
@@ -496,7 +511,7 @@
<p class="unprintable">Updated:
<!-- timestamp start -->
-$Date: 2019/03/02 03:30:05 $
+$Date: 2019/04/28 11:59:30 $
<!-- timestamp end -->
</p>
</div>
Index: po/open-source-misses-the-point.lt.po
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/po/open-source-misses-the-point.lt.po,v
retrieving revision 1.17
retrieving revision 1.18
diff -u -b -r1.17 -r1.18
--- po/open-source-misses-the-point.lt.po 2 Mar 2019 03:30:05 -0000
1.17
+++ po/open-source-misses-the-point.lt.po 28 Apr 2019 11:59:30 -0000
1.18
@@ -7,7 +7,7 @@
msgid ""
msgstr ""
"Project-Id-Version: open-source-misses-the-point.html\n"
-"POT-Creation-Date: 2019-03-02 03:26+0000\n"
+"POT-Creation-Date: 2019-04-28 11:56+0000\n"
"PO-Revision-Date: 2016-01-15 02:06+0200\n"
"Last-Translator: Donatas Klimašauskas <address@hidden>\n"
"Language-Team: Lithuanian <address@hidden>\n"
@@ -293,14 +293,41 @@
#. type: Content of: <div><p>
msgid ""
-"Second, and more important in practice, many products containing computers "
+"Second, when a program's source code carries a weak license, one without "
+"copyleft, its executables can carry additional nonfree conditions. <a href="
+"\"https://code.visualstudio.com/License/\";>Microsoft does this with Visual "
+"Studio,</a> for example."
+msgstr ""
+
+#. type: Content of: <div><p>
+msgid ""
+"If these executables fully correspond to the released sources, they qualify "
+"as open source but not as free software. However, in that case users can "
+"compile the source code to make and distribute free executables."
+msgstr ""
+
+#. type: Content of: <div><p>
+#, fuzzy
+#| msgid ""
+#| "Second, and more important in practice, many products containing "
+#| "computers check signatures on their executable programs to block users "
+#| "from installing different executables; only one privileged company can "
+#| "make executables that can run in the device or can access its full "
+#| "capabilities. We call these devices “tyrants”, and the "
+#| "practice is called “tivoization” after the product (Tivo) "
+#| "where we first saw it. Even if the executable is made from free source "
+#| "code, the users cannot run modified versions of it, so the executable is "
+#| "nonfree."
+msgid ""
+"Finally, and most important in practice, many products containing computers "
"check signatures on their executable programs to block users from installing "
"different executables; only one privileged company can make executables that "
"can run in the device or can access its full capabilities. We call these "
"devices “tyrants”, and the practice is called “"
"tivoization” after the product (Tivo) where we first saw it. Even if "
-"the executable is made from free source code, the users cannot run modified "
-"versions of it, so the executable is nonfree."
+"the executable is made from free source code, and nominally carries a free "
+"license, the users cannot run modified versions of it, so the executable is "
+"de-facto nonfree."
msgstr ""
"Antra, ir labiau svarbu praktikoje, daug produktų, turinÄių kompiuterius, "
"tikrina savo vykdomųjų programų parašus, kad naudotojus užblokuotų nuo
kitų "
@@ -314,11 +341,23 @@
#. type: Content of: <div><p>
msgid ""
-"The criteria for open source do not recognize this issue; they are concerned "
-"solely with the licensing of the source code. Thus, these unmodifiable "
-"executables, when made from source code such as Linux that is open source "
-"and free, are open source but not free. Many Android products contain "
-"nonfree tivoized executables of Linux."
+"Many Android products contain nonfree tivoized executables of Linux, even "
+"though its source code is under GNU GPL version 2. We designed GNU GPL "
+"version 3 to prohibit this practice."
+msgstr ""
+
+#. type: Content of: <div><p>
+#, fuzzy
+#| msgid ""
+#| "The criteria for open source do not recognize this issue; they are "
+#| "concerned solely with the licensing of the source code. Thus, these "
+#| "unmodifiable executables, when made from source code such as Linux that "
+#| "is open source and free, are open source but not free. Many Android "
+#| "products contain nonfree tivoized executables of Linux."
+msgid ""
+"The criteria for open source are concerned solely with the licensing of the "
+"source code. Thus, these nonfree executables, when made from source code "
+"such as Linux that is open source and free, are open source but not free."
msgstr ""
"Kriterijai atviram šaltiniui šitos problemos neatpažįsta; jais
rūpinamasi "
"tik Å¡altinio kodo licencijavimu. TodÄl, Å¡ie nemodifikuojami vykdomieji "
Index: po/open-source-misses-the-point.ml.po
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/po/open-source-misses-the-point.ml.po,v
retrieving revision 1.60
retrieving revision 1.61
diff -u -b -r1.60 -r1.61
--- po/open-source-misses-the-point.ml.po 25 Apr 2019 18:00:53 -0000
1.60
+++ po/open-source-misses-the-point.ml.po 28 Apr 2019 11:59:30 -0000
1.61
@@ -9,7 +9,7 @@
msgid ""
msgstr ""
"Project-Id-Version: open-source-misses-the-point.html 1\n"
-"POT-Creation-Date: 2019-03-02 03:26+0000\n"
+"POT-Creation-Date: 2019-04-28 11:56+0000\n"
"PO-Revision-Date: 2019-04-25 18:37+0200\n"
"Last-Translator: Aiswarya kk <address@hidden>\n"
"Language-Team: Malayalam <address@hidden>\n"
@@ -17,6 +17,7 @@
"MIME-Version: 1.0\n"
"Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8\n"
"Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8-bit\n"
+"X-Outdated-Since: 2019-04-28 11:56+0000\n"
"Plural-Forms: nplurals=2; plural=n != 1;\n"
"X-Generator: Lokalize 18.12.3\n"
@@ -260,14 +261,51 @@
#. type: Content of: <div><p>
msgid ""
-"Second, and more important in practice, many products containing computers "
+"Second, when a program's source code carries a weak license, one without "
+"copyleft, its executables can carry additional nonfree conditions. <a href="
+"\"https://code.visualstudio.com/License/\";>Microsoft does this with Visual "
+"Studio,</a> for example."
+msgstr ""
+
+#. type: Content of: <div><p>
+msgid ""
+"If these executables fully correspond to the released sources, they qualify "
+"as open source but not as free software. However, in that case users can "
+"compile the source code to make and distribute free executables."
+msgstr ""
+
+#. type: Content of: <div><p>
+# | [-Second,-]{+Finally,+} and [-more-] {+most+} important in practice, many
+# | products containing computers check signatures on their executable
+# | programs to block users from installing different executables; only one
+# | privileged company can make executables that can run in the device or can
+# | access its full capabilities. We call these devices
+# | “tyrants”, and the practice is called
+# | “tivoization” after the product (Tivo) where we first saw it.
+# | Even if the executable is made from free source code, {+and nominally
+# | carries a free license,+} the users cannot run modified versions of it, so
+# | the executable is {+de-facto+} nonfree.
+#, fuzzy
+#| msgid ""
+#| "Second, and more important in practice, many products containing "
+#| "computers check signatures on their executable programs to block users "
+#| "from installing different executables; only one privileged company can "
+#| "make executables that can run in the device or can access its full "
+#| "capabilities. We call these devices “tyrants”, and the "
+#| "practice is called “tivoization” after the product (Tivo) "
+#| "where we first saw it. Even if the executable is made from free source "
+#| "code, the users cannot run modified versions of it, so the executable is "
+#| "nonfree."
+msgid ""
+"Finally, and most important in practice, many products containing computers "
"check signatures on their executable programs to block users from installing "
"different executables; only one privileged company can make executables that "
"can run in the device or can access its full capabilities. We call these "
"devices “tyrants”, and the practice is called “"
"tivoization” after the product (Tivo) where we first saw it. Even if "
-"the executable is made from free source code, the users cannot run modified "
-"versions of it, so the executable is nonfree."
+"the executable is made from free source code, and nominally carries a free "
+"license, the users cannot run modified versions of it, so the executable is "
+"de-facto nonfree."
msgstr ""
"à´°à´£àµà´à´¾à´®à´¤àµà´¤àµà´¤àµà´ ഫലതàµà´¤à´¿àµ½
à´àµà´àµà´¤àµ½ à´ªàµà´°à´¾à´§à´¾à´¨àµà´¯à´®àµà´³àµà´³à´¤àµà´, പല
à´à´²àµà´ªà´¨àµà´¨à´àµà´à´³àµà´àµà´¯àµà´
à´à´àµà´¸à´¿à´àµà´¯àµà´àµà´à´¬à´¿àµ¾
à´ªàµà´°àµà´àµà´°à´¾à´®àµà´à´³à´¿àµ½ "
"à´µàµà´¯à´¤àµà´¯à´¸àµà´¤à´®à´¾à´¯
മറàµà´±àµà´¤àµà´àµà´à´¿à´²àµà´
à´à´àµà´¸à´¿à´àµà´¯àµà´àµà´à´¬à´¿àµ¾ à´àµ»à´¸àµà´±àµà´±à´¾àµ¾
à´àµà´¯àµà´¯àµà´¨àµà´¨à´¤à´¿àµ½ നിനàµà´¨àµà´
à´à´ªà´¯àµà´àµà´¤à´¾à´µà´¿à´¨àµ "
@@ -282,11 +320,28 @@
#. type: Content of: <div><p>
msgid ""
-"The criteria for open source do not recognize this issue; they are concerned "
-"solely with the licensing of the source code. Thus, these unmodifiable "
-"executables, when made from source code such as Linux that is open source "
-"and free, are open source but not free. Many Android products contain "
-"nonfree tivoized executables of Linux."
+"Many Android products contain nonfree tivoized executables of Linux, even "
+"though its source code is under GNU GPL version 2. We designed GNU GPL "
+"version 3 to prohibit this practice."
+msgstr ""
+
+#. type: Content of: <div><p>
+# | The criteria for open source [-do not recognize this issue; they-] are
+# | concerned solely with the licensing of the source code. Thus, these
+# | [-unmodifiable-] {+nonfree+} executables, when made from source code such
+# | as Linux that is open source and free, are open source but not free.
+# | [-Many Android products contain nonfree tivoized executables of Linux.-]
+#, fuzzy
+#| msgid ""
+#| "The criteria for open source do not recognize this issue; they are "
+#| "concerned solely with the licensing of the source code. Thus, these "
+#| "unmodifiable executables, when made from source code such as Linux that "
+#| "is open source and free, are open source but not free. Many Android "
+#| "products contain nonfree tivoized executables of Linux."
+msgid ""
+"The criteria for open source are concerned solely with the licensing of the "
+"source code. Thus, these nonfree executables, when made from source code "
+"such as Linux that is open source and free, are open source but not free."
msgstr ""
"à´à´ªàµà´ªàµº à´¸àµà´´àµà´¸à´¿à´¨àµà´±àµ
മാനദണàµà´¡à´àµà´àµ¾ à´ à´ªàµà´°à´¶àµà´¨à´
തിരിà´àµà´à´±à´¿à´¯àµà´¨àµà´¨à´¿à´²àµà´²; à´
വർ
à´¸àµà´´àµà´¸àµ à´àµà´¡à´¿à´¨àµà´±àµ
സമàµà´®à´¤à´ªà´¤àµà´°à´¤àµà´¤à´¿àµ½ "
"മാതàµà´°à´®àµ താൽപരàµà´¯à´
à´ªàµà´°à´à´à´¿à´ªàµà´ªà´¿à´¯àµà´àµà´àµà´¨àµà´¨àµà´³àµà´³àµ. à´
തായതàµ, à´à´¤àµà´¤à´°à´
à´®àµà´àµà´à´ªàµà´ªàµà´àµà´¤àµà´¤à´¾àµ» à´à´´à´¿à´¯à´¾à´¤àµà´¤ "
Index: po/open-source-misses-the-point.nl-diff.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/po/open-source-misses-the-point.nl-diff.html,v
retrieving revision 1.28
retrieving revision 1.29
diff -u -b -r1.28 -r1.29
--- po/open-source-misses-the-point.nl-diff.html 21 Apr 2019 10:30:27
-0000 1.28
+++ po/open-source-misses-the-point.nl-diff.html 28 Apr 2019 11:59:30
-0000 1.29
@@ -136,21 +136,36 @@
because its license does not allow making a modified version and using
it privately. Fortunately, few programs use such licenses.</p>
-<p>Second, and more important in practice, many products containing
+<p>Second, <span class="inserted"><ins><em>when a program's source code
carries a weak license, one
+without copyleft, its executables can carry additional nonfree
+conditions. <a href="https://code.visualstudio.com/License/">Microsoft
+does this with Visual Studio,</a> for example.</p>
+
+<p>If these executables fully correspond to the released sources, they
+qualify as open source but not as free software. However, in that
+case users can compile the source code to make</em></ins></span> and <span
class="removed"><del><strong>more</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>distribute free
+executables.</p>
+
+<p>Finally, and most</em></ins></span> important in practice, many
products containing
computers check signatures on their executable programs to block users
from installing different executables; only one privileged company can
make executables that can run in the device or can access its full
capabilities. We call these devices “tyrants”, and the
practice is called “tivoization” after the product (Tivo)
where we first saw it. Even if the executable is made from free
-source code, the users cannot run modified versions of it, so the
-executable is nonfree.</p>
+source code, <span class="inserted"><ins><em>and nominally carries a free
license,</em></ins></span> the users cannot
+run modified versions of it, so the executable is <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>de-facto</em></ins></span> nonfree.</p>
-<p>The criteria for open source do not recognize this issue; they are
-concerned solely with the licensing of the source code. Thus, these
-unmodifiable executables, when made from source code such as Linux
-that is open source and free, are open source but not free. Many
-Android products contain nonfree tivoized executables of Linux.</p>
+<span class="inserted"><ins><em><p>Many Android products contain nonfree
tivoized executables of
+Linux, even though its source code is under GNU GPL version 2. We
+designed GNU GPL version 3 to prohibit this
practice.</p></em></ins></span>
+
+<p>The criteria for open source <span class="removed"><del><strong>do
not recognize this issue; they</strong></del></span> are concerned solely with
the
+licensing of the source code. Thus, these
+<span class="removed"><del><strong>unmodifiable</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>nonfree</em></ins></span> executables, when
+made from source code such as Linux that is open source and free, are
+open source but not <span class="removed"><del><strong>free. Many
+Android products contain nonfree tivoized executables of
Linux.</p></strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>free.</p></em></ins></span>
<h3>Common Misunderstandings of “Free Software” and
“Open Source”</h3>
@@ -496,7 +511,7 @@
<p class="unprintable">Updated:
<!-- timestamp start -->
-$Date: 2019/04/21 10:30:27 $
+$Date: 2019/04/28 11:59:30 $
<!-- timestamp end -->
</p>
</div>
Index: po/open-source-misses-the-point.nl.po
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/po/open-source-misses-the-point.nl.po,v
retrieving revision 1.47
retrieving revision 1.48
diff -u -b -r1.47 -r1.48
--- po/open-source-misses-the-point.nl.po 2 Mar 2019 03:30:05 -0000
1.47
+++ po/open-source-misses-the-point.nl.po 28 Apr 2019 11:59:30 -0000
1.48
@@ -7,7 +7,7 @@
msgid ""
msgstr ""
"Project-Id-Version: open-source-misses-the-point.html\n"
-"POT-Creation-Date: 2019-03-02 03:26+0000\n"
+"POT-Creation-Date: 2019-04-28 11:56+0000\n"
"PO-Revision-Date: \n"
"Last-Translator: Justin van Steijn <address@hidden>\n"
"Language-Team: Dutch\n"
@@ -309,14 +309,51 @@
#. type: Content of: <div><p>
msgid ""
-"Second, and more important in practice, many products containing computers "
+"Second, when a program's source code carries a weak license, one without "
+"copyleft, its executables can carry additional nonfree conditions. <a href="
+"\"https://code.visualstudio.com/License/\";>Microsoft does this with Visual "
+"Studio,</a> for example."
+msgstr ""
+
+#. type: Content of: <div><p>
+msgid ""
+"If these executables fully correspond to the released sources, they qualify "
+"as open source but not as free software. However, in that case users can "
+"compile the source code to make and distribute free executables."
+msgstr ""
+
+#. type: Content of: <div><p>
+# | [-Second,-]{+Finally,+} and [-more-] {+most+} important in practice, many
+# | products containing computers check signatures on their executable
+# | programs to block users from installing different executables; only one
+# | privileged company can make executables that can run in the device or can
+# | access its full capabilities. We call these devices
+# | “tyrants”, and the practice is called
+# | “tivoization” after the product (Tivo) where we first saw it.
+# | Even if the executable is made from free source code, {+and nominally
+# | carries a free license,+} the users cannot run modified versions of it, so
+# | the executable is {+de-facto+} nonfree.
+#, fuzzy
+#| msgid ""
+#| "Second, and more important in practice, many products containing "
+#| "computers check signatures on their executable programs to block users "
+#| "from installing different executables; only one privileged company can "
+#| "make executables that can run in the device or can access its full "
+#| "capabilities. We call these devices “tyrants”, and the "
+#| "practice is called “tivoization” after the product (Tivo) "
+#| "where we first saw it. Even if the executable is made from free source "
+#| "code, the users cannot run modified versions of it, so the executable is "
+#| "nonfree."
+msgid ""
+"Finally, and most important in practice, many products containing computers "
"check signatures on their executable programs to block users from installing "
"different executables; only one privileged company can make executables that "
"can run in the device or can access its full capabilities. We call these "
"devices “tyrants”, and the practice is called “"
"tivoization” after the product (Tivo) where we first saw it. Even if "
-"the executable is made from free source code, the users cannot run modified "
-"versions of it, so the executable is nonfree."
+"the executable is made from free source code, and nominally carries a free "
+"license, the users cannot run modified versions of it, so the executable is "
+"de-facto nonfree."
msgstr ""
"Ten tweede, en veel belangrijker, bevatten veel apparaten met computers erin "
"uitvoerbare programma's afkomstig uit vrije-software-broncode waarbij deze "
@@ -328,14 +365,31 @@
"zijn geen vrije software omdat gebruikers geen aangepaste versies kunnen "
"gebruiken, ook al is de broncode waar het van afstamt wel vrij."
-# verduidelijkt
#. type: Content of: <div><p>
msgid ""
-"The criteria for open source do not recognize this issue; they are concerned "
-"solely with the licensing of the source code. Thus, these unmodifiable "
-"executables, when made from source code such as Linux that is open source "
-"and free, are open source but not free. Many Android products contain "
-"nonfree tivoized executables of Linux."
+"Many Android products contain nonfree tivoized executables of Linux, even "
+"though its source code is under GNU GPL version 2. We designed GNU GPL "
+"version 3 to prohibit this practice."
+msgstr ""
+
+# verduidelijkt
+#. type: Content of: <div><p>
+# | The criteria for open source [-do not recognize this issue; they-] are
+# | concerned solely with the licensing of the source code. Thus, these
+# | [-unmodifiable-] {+nonfree+} executables, when made from source code such
+# | as Linux that is open source and free, are open source but not free.
+# | [-Many Android products contain nonfree tivoized executables of Linux.-]
+#, fuzzy
+#| msgid ""
+#| "The criteria for open source do not recognize this issue; they are "
+#| "concerned solely with the licensing of the source code. Thus, these "
+#| "unmodifiable executables, when made from source code such as Linux that "
+#| "is open source and free, are open source but not free. Many Android "
+#| "products contain nonfree tivoized executables of Linux."
+msgid ""
+"The criteria for open source are concerned solely with the licensing of the "
+"source code. Thus, these nonfree executables, when made from source code "
+"such as Linux that is open source and free, are open source but not free."
msgstr ""
"Open bron erkent dit probleem niet; het gaat ze alleen om het uitgeven van "
"de broncode. Deze programma's zijn gemaakt van broncode zoals Linux die "
Index: po/open-source-misses-the-point.pl-diff.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/po/open-source-misses-the-point.pl-diff.html,v
retrieving revision 1.6
retrieving revision 1.7
diff -u -b -r1.6 -r1.7
--- po/open-source-misses-the-point.pl-diff.html 21 Apr 2019 10:30:27
-0000 1.6
+++ po/open-source-misses-the-point.pl-diff.html 28 Apr 2019 11:59:30
-0000 1.7
@@ -136,21 +136,36 @@
because its license does not allow making a modified version and using
it privately. Fortunately, few programs use such licenses.</p>
-<p>Second, and more important in practice, many products containing
+<p>Second, <span class="inserted"><ins><em>when a program's source code
carries a weak license, one
+without copyleft, its executables can carry additional nonfree
+conditions. <a href="https://code.visualstudio.com/License/">Microsoft
+does this with Visual Studio,</a> for example.</p>
+
+<p>If these executables fully correspond to the released sources, they
+qualify as open source but not as free software. However, in that
+case users can compile the source code to make</em></ins></span> and <span
class="removed"><del><strong>more</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>distribute free
+executables.</p>
+
+<p>Finally, and most</em></ins></span> important in practice, many
products containing
computers check signatures on their executable programs to block users
from installing different executables; only one privileged company can
make executables that can run in the device or can access its full
capabilities. We call these devices “tyrants”, and the
practice is called “tivoization” after the product (Tivo)
where we first saw it. Even if the executable is made from free
-source code, the users cannot run modified versions of it, so the
-executable is nonfree.</p>
+source code, <span class="inserted"><ins><em>and nominally carries a free
license,</em></ins></span> the users cannot
+run modified versions of it, so the executable is <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>de-facto</em></ins></span> nonfree.</p>
-<p>The criteria for open source do not recognize this issue; they are
-concerned solely with the licensing of the source code. Thus, these
-unmodifiable executables, when made from source code such as Linux
-that is open source and free, are open source but not free. Many
-Android products contain nonfree tivoized executables of Linux.</p>
+<span class="inserted"><ins><em><p>Many Android products contain nonfree
tivoized executables of
+Linux, even though its source code is under GNU GPL version 2. We
+designed GNU GPL version 3 to prohibit this
practice.</p></em></ins></span>
+
+<p>The criteria for open source <span class="removed"><del><strong>do
not recognize this issue; they</strong></del></span> are concerned solely with
the
+licensing of the source code. Thus, these
+<span class="removed"><del><strong>unmodifiable</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>nonfree</em></ins></span> executables, when
+made from source code such as Linux that is open source and free, are
+open source but not <span class="removed"><del><strong>free. Many
+Android products contain nonfree tivoized executables of
Linux.</p></strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>free.</p></em></ins></span>
<h3>Common Misunderstandings of “Free Software” and
“Open Source”</h3>
@@ -496,7 +511,7 @@
<p class="unprintable">Updated:
<!-- timestamp start -->
-$Date: 2019/04/21 10:30:27 $
+$Date: 2019/04/28 11:59:30 $
<!-- timestamp end -->
</p>
</div>
Index: po/open-source-misses-the-point.pl.po
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/po/open-source-misses-the-point.pl.po,v
retrieving revision 1.74
retrieving revision 1.75
diff -u -b -r1.74 -r1.75
--- po/open-source-misses-the-point.pl.po 2 Mar 2019 03:30:05 -0000
1.74
+++ po/open-source-misses-the-point.pl.po 28 Apr 2019 11:59:30 -0000
1.75
@@ -8,7 +8,7 @@
msgstr ""
"Project-Id-Version: Why Open Source misses the point of Free Software\n"
"Report-Msgid-Bugs-To: \n"
-"POT-Creation-Date: 2019-03-02 03:26+0000\n"
+"POT-Creation-Date: 2019-04-28 11:56+0000\n"
"PO-Revision-Date: 2017-05-01 10:34-0600\n"
"Last-Translator: Jan Owoc <jsowoc AT gmail.com>\n"
"Language-Team: Polish <address@hidden>\n"
@@ -331,14 +331,51 @@
#. type: Content of: <div><p>
msgid ""
-"Second, and more important in practice, many products containing computers "
+"Second, when a program's source code carries a weak license, one without "
+"copyleft, its executables can carry additional nonfree conditions. <a href="
+"\"https://code.visualstudio.com/License/\";>Microsoft does this with Visual "
+"Studio,</a> for example."
+msgstr ""
+
+#. type: Content of: <div><p>
+msgid ""
+"If these executables fully correspond to the released sources, they qualify "
+"as open source but not as free software. However, in that case users can "
+"compile the source code to make and distribute free executables."
+msgstr ""
+
+#. type: Content of: <div><p>
+# | [-Second,-]{+Finally,+} and [-more-] {+most+} important in practice, many
+# | products containing computers check signatures on their executable
+# | programs to block users from installing different executables; only one
+# | privileged company can make executables that can run in the device or can
+# | access its full capabilities. We call these devices
+# | “tyrants”, and the practice is called
+# | “tivoization” after the product (Tivo) where we first saw it.
+# | Even if the executable is made from free source code, {+and nominally
+# | carries a free license,+} the users cannot run modified versions of it, so
+# | the executable is {+de-facto+} nonfree.
+#, fuzzy
+#| msgid ""
+#| "Second, and more important in practice, many products containing "
+#| "computers check signatures on their executable programs to block users "
+#| "from installing different executables; only one privileged company can "
+#| "make executables that can run in the device or can access its full "
+#| "capabilities. We call these devices “tyrants”, and the "
+#| "practice is called “tivoization” after the product (Tivo) "
+#| "where we first saw it. Even if the executable is made from free source "
+#| "code, the users cannot run modified versions of it, so the executable is "
+#| "nonfree."
+msgid ""
+"Finally, and most important in practice, many products containing computers "
"check signatures on their executable programs to block users from installing "
"different executables; only one privileged company can make executables that "
"can run in the device or can access its full capabilities. We call these "
"devices “tyrants”, and the practice is called “"
"tivoization” after the product (Tivo) where we first saw it. Even if "
-"the executable is made from free source code, the users cannot run modified "
-"versions of it, so the executable is nonfree."
+"the executable is made from free source code, and nominally carries a free "
+"license, the users cannot run modified versions of it, so the executable is "
+"de-facto nonfree."
msgstr ""
"Po drugie, i co ważniejsze w praktyce, wiele produktów "
"bÄdÄ
cych swego rodzaju komputerami sprawdzajÄ
podpisy na programach "
@@ -353,11 +390,28 @@
#. type: Content of: <div><p>
msgid ""
-"The criteria for open source do not recognize this issue; they are concerned "
-"solely with the licensing of the source code. Thus, these unmodifiable "
-"executables, when made from source code such as Linux that is open source "
-"and free, are open source but not free. Many Android products contain "
-"nonfree tivoized executables of Linux."
+"Many Android products contain nonfree tivoized executables of Linux, even "
+"though its source code is under GNU GPL version 2. We designed GNU GPL "
+"version 3 to prohibit this practice."
+msgstr ""
+
+#. type: Content of: <div><p>
+# | The criteria for open source [-do not recognize this issue; they-] are
+# | concerned solely with the licensing of the source code. Thus, these
+# | [-unmodifiable-] {+nonfree+} executables, when made from source code such
+# | as Linux that is open source and free, are open source but not free.
+# | [-Many Android products contain nonfree tivoized executables of Linux.-]
+#, fuzzy
+#| msgid ""
+#| "The criteria for open source do not recognize this issue; they are "
+#| "concerned solely with the licensing of the source code. Thus, these "
+#| "unmodifiable executables, when made from source code such as Linux that "
+#| "is open source and free, are open source but not free. Many Android "
+#| "products contain nonfree tivoized executables of Linux."
+msgid ""
+"The criteria for open source are concerned solely with the licensing of the "
+"source code. Thus, these nonfree executables, when made from source code "
+"such as Linux that is open source and free, are open source but not free."
msgstr ""
"Kryteria otwartego oprogramowania zdajÄ
siÄ nie zauważaÄ tego problemu "
"i zwracajÄ
uwagÄ tylko na licencjÄ kodu źródÅowego. Te
programy, "
Index: po/open-source-misses-the-point.pot
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/po/open-source-misses-the-point.pot,v
retrieving revision 1.46
retrieving revision 1.47
diff -u -b -r1.46 -r1.47
--- po/open-source-misses-the-point.pot 2 Mar 2019 03:30:05 -0000 1.46
+++ po/open-source-misses-the-point.pot 28 Apr 2019 11:59:30 -0000 1.47
@@ -7,7 +7,7 @@
msgid ""
msgstr ""
"Project-Id-Version: open-source-misses-the-point.html\n"
-"POT-Creation-Date: 2019-03-02 03:26+0000\n"
+"POT-Creation-Date: 2019-04-28 11:56+0000\n"
"PO-Revision-Date: YEAR-MO-DA HO:MI+ZONE\n"
"Last-Translator: FULL NAME <address@hidden>\n"
"Language-Team: LANGUAGE <address@hidden>\n"
@@ -168,23 +168,44 @@
#. type: Content of: <div><p>
msgid ""
-"Second, and more important in practice, many products containing computers "
+"Second, when a program's source code carries a weak license, one without "
+"copyleft, its executables can carry additional nonfree conditions. <a "
+"href=\"https://code.visualstudio.com/License/\";>Microsoft does this with "
+"Visual Studio,</a> for example."
+msgstr ""
+
+#. type: Content of: <div><p>
+msgid ""
+"If these executables fully correspond to the released sources, they qualify "
+"as open source but not as free software. However, in that case users can "
+"compile the source code to make and distribute free executables."
+msgstr ""
+
+#. type: Content of: <div><p>
+msgid ""
+"Finally, and most important in practice, many products containing computers "
"check signatures on their executable programs to block users from installing "
"different executables; only one privileged company can make executables that "
"can run in the device or can access its full capabilities. We call these "
"devices “tyrants”, and the practice is called "
"“tivoization” after the product (Tivo) where we first saw it. "
-"Even if the executable is made from free source code, the users cannot run "
-"modified versions of it, so the executable is nonfree."
+"Even if the executable is made from free source code, and nominally carries "
+"a free license, the users cannot run modified versions of it, so the "
+"executable is de-facto nonfree."
+msgstr ""
+
+#. type: Content of: <div><p>
+msgid ""
+"Many Android products contain nonfree tivoized executables of Linux, even "
+"though its source code is under GNU GPL version 2. We designed GNU GPL "
+"version 3 to prohibit this practice."
msgstr ""
#. type: Content of: <div><p>
msgid ""
-"The criteria for open source do not recognize this issue; they are concerned "
-"solely with the licensing of the source code. Thus, these unmodifiable "
-"executables, when made from source code such as Linux that is open source "
-"and free, are open source but not free. Many Android products contain "
-"nonfree tivoized executables of Linux."
+"The criteria for open source are concerned solely with the licensing of the "
+"source code. Thus, these nonfree executables, when made from source code "
+"such as Linux that is open source and free, are open source but not free."
msgstr ""
#. type: Content of: <div><h3>
Index: po/open-source-misses-the-point.pt-br.po
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/po/open-source-misses-the-point.pt-br.po,v
retrieving revision 1.42
retrieving revision 1.43
diff -u -b -r1.42 -r1.43
--- po/open-source-misses-the-point.pt-br.po 12 Mar 2019 14:31:29 -0000
1.42
+++ po/open-source-misses-the-point.pt-br.po 28 Apr 2019 11:59:30 -0000
1.43
@@ -9,7 +9,7 @@
msgid ""
msgstr ""
"Project-Id-Version: open-source-misses-the-point.html\n"
-"POT-Creation-Date: 2019-03-02 03:26+0000\n"
+"POT-Creation-Date: 2019-04-28 11:56+0000\n"
"PO-Revision-Date: 2019-03-12 08:17-0200\n"
"Last-Translator: Rafael Fontenelle <address@hidden>\n"
"Language-Team: Brazilian Portuguese <address@hidden>\n"
@@ -17,6 +17,7 @@
"MIME-Version: 1.0\n"
"Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8\n"
"Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit\n"
+"X-Outdated-Since: 2019-04-28 11:56+0000\n"
"Plural-Forms: nplurals=2; plural=(n > 1);\n"
"X-Generator: Virtaal 1.0.0-beta1\n"
@@ -264,14 +265,41 @@
#. type: Content of: <div><p>
msgid ""
-"Second, and more important in practice, many products containing computers "
+"Second, when a program's source code carries a weak license, one without "
+"copyleft, its executables can carry additional nonfree conditions. <a href="
+"\"https://code.visualstudio.com/License/\";>Microsoft does this with Visual "
+"Studio,</a> for example."
+msgstr ""
+
+#. type: Content of: <div><p>
+msgid ""
+"If these executables fully correspond to the released sources, they qualify "
+"as open source but not as free software. However, in that case users can "
+"compile the source code to make and distribute free executables."
+msgstr ""
+
+#. type: Content of: <div><p>
+#, fuzzy
+#| msgid ""
+#| "Second, and more important in practice, many products containing "
+#| "computers check signatures on their executable programs to block users "
+#| "from installing different executables; only one privileged company can "
+#| "make executables that can run in the device or can access its full "
+#| "capabilities. We call these devices “tyrants”, and the "
+#| "practice is called “tivoization” after the product (Tivo) "
+#| "where we first saw it. Even if the executable is made from free source "
+#| "code, the users cannot run modified versions of it, so the executable is "
+#| "nonfree."
+msgid ""
+"Finally, and most important in practice, many products containing computers "
"check signatures on their executable programs to block users from installing "
"different executables; only one privileged company can make executables that "
"can run in the device or can access its full capabilities. We call these "
"devices “tyrants”, and the practice is called “"
"tivoization” after the product (Tivo) where we first saw it. Even if "
-"the executable is made from free source code, the users cannot run modified "
-"versions of it, so the executable is nonfree."
+"the executable is made from free source code, and nominally carries a free "
+"license, the users cannot run modified versions of it, so the executable is "
+"de-facto nonfree."
msgstr ""
"Segundo, e mais importante na prática, muitos produtos contendo computadores
"
"verificam assinaturas em seus programas executáveis para bloquear usuários "
@@ -285,11 +313,23 @@
#. type: Content of: <div><p>
msgid ""
-"The criteria for open source do not recognize this issue; they are concerned "
-"solely with the licensing of the source code. Thus, these unmodifiable "
-"executables, when made from source code such as Linux that is open source "
-"and free, are open source but not free. Many Android products contain "
-"nonfree tivoized executables of Linux."
+"Many Android products contain nonfree tivoized executables of Linux, even "
+"though its source code is under GNU GPL version 2. We designed GNU GPL "
+"version 3 to prohibit this practice."
+msgstr ""
+
+#. type: Content of: <div><p>
+#, fuzzy
+#| msgid ""
+#| "The criteria for open source do not recognize this issue; they are "
+#| "concerned solely with the licensing of the source code. Thus, these "
+#| "unmodifiable executables, when made from source code such as Linux that "
+#| "is open source and free, are open source but not free. Many Android "
+#| "products contain nonfree tivoized executables of Linux."
+msgid ""
+"The criteria for open source are concerned solely with the licensing of the "
+"source code. Thus, these nonfree executables, when made from source code "
+"such as Linux that is open source and free, are open source but not free."
msgstr ""
"Os critérios de código aberto não reconhecem essa questão; eles se
preocupam "
"unicamente com o licenciamento do código aberto. Então, esses executáveis "
Index: po/open-source-misses-the-point.ro.po
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/po/open-source-misses-the-point.ro.po,v
retrieving revision 1.42
retrieving revision 1.43
diff -u -b -r1.42 -r1.43
--- po/open-source-misses-the-point.ro.po 2 Mar 2019 03:30:05 -0000
1.42
+++ po/open-source-misses-the-point.ro.po 28 Apr 2019 11:59:30 -0000
1.43
@@ -8,7 +8,7 @@
msgid ""
msgstr ""
"Project-Id-Version: open-source-misses-the-point.html\n"
-"POT-Creation-Date: 2019-03-02 03:26+0000\n"
+"POT-Creation-Date: 2019-04-28 11:56+0000\n"
"PO-Revision-Date: 2010-08-27 20:00+0300\n"
"Last-Translator: CÄtÄlin Frâncu <address@hidden>\n"
"Language-Team: Romanian <address@hidden>\n"
@@ -299,23 +299,44 @@
#. type: Content of: <div><p>
msgid ""
-"Second, and more important in practice, many products containing computers "
+"Second, when a program's source code carries a weak license, one without "
+"copyleft, its executables can carry additional nonfree conditions. <a href="
+"\"https://code.visualstudio.com/License/\";>Microsoft does this with Visual "
+"Studio,</a> for example."
+msgstr ""
+
+#. type: Content of: <div><p>
+msgid ""
+"If these executables fully correspond to the released sources, they qualify "
+"as open source but not as free software. However, in that case users can "
+"compile the source code to make and distribute free executables."
+msgstr ""
+
+#. type: Content of: <div><p>
+msgid ""
+"Finally, and most important in practice, many products containing computers "
"check signatures on their executable programs to block users from installing "
"different executables; only one privileged company can make executables that "
"can run in the device or can access its full capabilities. We call these "
"devices “tyrants”, and the practice is called “"
"tivoization” after the product (Tivo) where we first saw it. Even if "
-"the executable is made from free source code, the users cannot run modified "
-"versions of it, so the executable is nonfree."
+"the executable is made from free source code, and nominally carries a free "
+"license, the users cannot run modified versions of it, so the executable is "
+"de-facto nonfree."
+msgstr ""
+
+#. type: Content of: <div><p>
+msgid ""
+"Many Android products contain nonfree tivoized executables of Linux, even "
+"though its source code is under GNU GPL version 2. We designed GNU GPL "
+"version 3 to prohibit this practice."
msgstr ""
#. type: Content of: <div><p>
msgid ""
-"The criteria for open source do not recognize this issue; they are concerned "
-"solely with the licensing of the source code. Thus, these unmodifiable "
-"executables, when made from source code such as Linux that is open source "
-"and free, are open source but not free. Many Android products contain "
-"nonfree tivoized executables of Linux."
+"The criteria for open source are concerned solely with the licensing of the "
+"source code. Thus, these nonfree executables, when made from source code "
+"such as Linux that is open source and free, are open source but not free."
msgstr ""
#. type: Content of: <div><h3>
Index: po/open-source-misses-the-point.ru.po
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/po/open-source-misses-the-point.ru.po,v
retrieving revision 1.101
retrieving revision 1.102
diff -u -b -r1.101 -r1.102
--- po/open-source-misses-the-point.ru.po 2 Mar 2019 05:59:34 -0000
1.101
+++ po/open-source-misses-the-point.ru.po 28 Apr 2019 11:59:30 -0000
1.102
@@ -10,7 +10,7 @@
msgid ""
msgstr ""
"Project-Id-Version: open-source-misses-the-point.html\n"
-"POT-Creation-Date: 2019-03-02 03:26+0000\n"
+"POT-Creation-Date: 2019-04-28 11:56+0000\n"
"PO-Revision-Date: 2019-02-20 17:17+0000\n"
"Last-Translator: Ineiev <address@hidden>\n"
"Language-Team: Russian <address@hidden>\n"
@@ -18,6 +18,7 @@
"MIME-Version: 1.0\n"
"Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8\n"
"Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit\n"
+"X-Outdated-Since: 2019-04-28 11:56+0000\n"
# type: Content of: <title>
#. type: Content of: <title>
@@ -285,14 +286,51 @@
#. type: Content of: <div><p>
msgid ""
-"Second, and more important in practice, many products containing computers "
+"Second, when a program's source code carries a weak license, one without "
+"copyleft, its executables can carry additional nonfree conditions. <a href="
+"\"https://code.visualstudio.com/License/\";>Microsoft does this with Visual "
+"Studio,</a> for example."
+msgstr ""
+
+#. type: Content of: <div><p>
+msgid ""
+"If these executables fully correspond to the released sources, they qualify "
+"as open source but not as free software. However, in that case users can "
+"compile the source code to make and distribute free executables."
+msgstr ""
+
+#. type: Content of: <div><p>
+# | [-Second,-]{+Finally,+} and [-more-] {+most+} important in practice, many
+# | products containing computers check signatures on their executable
+# | programs to block users from installing different executables; only one
+# | privileged company can make executables that can run in the device or can
+# | access its full capabilities. We call these devices
+# | “tyrants”, and the practice is called
+# | “tivoization” after the product (Tivo) where we first saw it.
+# | Even if the executable is made from free source code, {+and nominally
+# | carries a free license,+} the users cannot run modified versions of it, so
+# | the executable is {+de-facto+} nonfree.
+#, fuzzy
+#| msgid ""
+#| "Second, and more important in practice, many products containing "
+#| "computers check signatures on their executable programs to block users "
+#| "from installing different executables; only one privileged company can "
+#| "make executables that can run in the device or can access its full "
+#| "capabilities. We call these devices “tyrants”, and the "
+#| "practice is called “tivoization” after the product (Tivo) "
+#| "where we first saw it. Even if the executable is made from free source "
+#| "code, the users cannot run modified versions of it, so the executable is "
+#| "nonfree."
+msgid ""
+"Finally, and most important in practice, many products containing computers "
"check signatures on their executable programs to block users from installing "
"different executables; only one privileged company can make executables that "
"can run in the device or can access its full capabilities. We call these "
"devices “tyrants”, and the practice is called “"
"tivoization” after the product (Tivo) where we first saw it. Even if "
-"the executable is made from free source code, the users cannot run modified "
-"versions of it, so the executable is nonfree."
+"the executable is made from free source code, and nominally carries a free "
+"license, the users cannot run modified versions of it, so the executable is "
+"de-facto nonfree."
msgstr ""
"Ðо-вÑоÑÑÑ
, ÑÑо на пÑакÑике более важно,
многие пÑодÑкÑÑ, ÑодеÑжаÑие "
"компÑÑÑеÑÑ, пÑовеÑÑÑÑ Ð¿Ð¾Ð´Ð¿Ð¸Ñи на ÑайлаÑ
иÑполнÑемÑÑ
ими пÑогÑамм и не даÑÑ "
@@ -307,11 +345,28 @@
#. type: Content of: <div><p>
msgid ""
-"The criteria for open source do not recognize this issue; they are concerned "
-"solely with the licensing of the source code. Thus, these unmodifiable "
-"executables, when made from source code such as Linux that is open source "
-"and free, are open source but not free. Many Android products contain "
-"nonfree tivoized executables of Linux."
+"Many Android products contain nonfree tivoized executables of Linux, even "
+"though its source code is under GNU GPL version 2. We designed GNU GPL "
+"version 3 to prohibit this practice."
+msgstr ""
+
+#. type: Content of: <div><p>
+# | The criteria for open source [-do not recognize this issue; they-] are
+# | concerned solely with the licensing of the source code. Thus, these
+# | [-unmodifiable-] {+nonfree+} executables, when made from source code such
+# | as Linux that is open source and free, are open source but not free.
+# | [-Many Android products contain nonfree tivoized executables of Linux.-]
+#, fuzzy
+#| msgid ""
+#| "The criteria for open source do not recognize this issue; they are "
+#| "concerned solely with the licensing of the source code. Thus, these "
+#| "unmodifiable executables, when made from source code such as Linux that "
+#| "is open source and free, are open source but not free. Many Android "
+#| "products contain nonfree tivoized executables of Linux."
+msgid ""
+"The criteria for open source are concerned solely with the licensing of the "
+"source code. Thus, these nonfree executables, when made from source code "
+"such as Linux that is open source and free, are open source but not free."
msgstr ""
"ÐÑиÑеÑии оÑкÑÑÑого ÑекÑÑа не пÑизнаÑÑ
ÑÑой пÑоблемÑ; они ÑаÑÑмаÑÑиваÑÑ "
"ÑолÑко лиÑензиÑование иÑÑ
одного ÑекÑÑа.
Таким обÑазом, когда ÑÑи иÑполнÑемÑе "
Index: po/open-source-misses-the-point.sq-diff.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/po/open-source-misses-the-point.sq-diff.html,v
retrieving revision 1.4
retrieving revision 1.5
diff -u -b -r1.4 -r1.5
--- po/open-source-misses-the-point.sq-diff.html 21 Apr 2019 10:30:27
-0000 1.4
+++ po/open-source-misses-the-point.sq-diff.html 28 Apr 2019 11:59:30
-0000 1.5
@@ -136,21 +136,36 @@
because its license does not allow making a modified version and using
it privately. Fortunately, few programs use such licenses.</p>
-<p>Second, and more important in practice, many products containing
+<p>Second, <span class="inserted"><ins><em>when a program's source code
carries a weak license, one
+without copyleft, its executables can carry additional nonfree
+conditions. <a href="https://code.visualstudio.com/License/">Microsoft
+does this with Visual Studio,</a> for example.</p>
+
+<p>If these executables fully correspond to the released sources, they
+qualify as open source but not as free software. However, in that
+case users can compile the source code to make</em></ins></span> and <span
class="removed"><del><strong>more</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>distribute free
+executables.</p>
+
+<p>Finally, and most</em></ins></span> important in practice, many
products containing
computers check signatures on their executable programs to block users
from installing different executables; only one privileged company can
make executables that can run in the device or can access its full
capabilities. We call these devices “tyrants”, and the
practice is called “tivoization” after the product (Tivo)
where we first saw it. Even if the executable is made from free
-source code, the users cannot run modified versions of it, so the
-executable is nonfree.</p>
+source code, <span class="inserted"><ins><em>and nominally carries a free
license,</em></ins></span> the users cannot
+run modified versions of it, so the executable is <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>de-facto</em></ins></span> nonfree.</p>
-<p>The criteria for open source do not recognize this issue; they are
-concerned solely with the licensing of the source code. Thus, these
-unmodifiable executables, when made from source code such as Linux
-that is open source and free, are open source but not free. Many
-Android products contain nonfree tivoized executables of Linux.</p>
+<span class="inserted"><ins><em><p>Many Android products contain nonfree
tivoized executables of
+Linux, even though its source code is under GNU GPL version 2. We
+designed GNU GPL version 3 to prohibit this
practice.</p></em></ins></span>
+
+<p>The criteria for open source <span class="removed"><del><strong>do
not recognize this issue; they</strong></del></span> are concerned solely with
the
+licensing of the source code. Thus, these
+<span class="removed"><del><strong>unmodifiable</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>nonfree</em></ins></span> executables, when
+made from source code such as Linux that is open source and free, are
+open source but not <span class="removed"><del><strong>free. Many
+Android products contain nonfree tivoized executables of
Linux.</p></strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>free.</p></em></ins></span>
<h3>Common Misunderstandings of “Free Software” and
“Open Source”</h3>
@@ -496,7 +511,7 @@
<p class="unprintable">Updated:
<!-- timestamp start -->
-$Date: 2019/04/21 10:30:27 $
+$Date: 2019/04/28 11:59:30 $
<!-- timestamp end -->
</p>
</div>
Index: po/open-source-misses-the-point.sq.po
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/po/open-source-misses-the-point.sq.po,v
retrieving revision 1.74
retrieving revision 1.75
diff -u -b -r1.74 -r1.75
--- po/open-source-misses-the-point.sq.po 2 Mar 2019 03:30:05 -0000
1.74
+++ po/open-source-misses-the-point.sq.po 28 Apr 2019 11:59:30 -0000
1.75
@@ -6,7 +6,7 @@
msgid ""
msgstr ""
"Project-Id-Version: open-source-misses-the-point.html\n"
-"POT-Creation-Date: 2019-03-02 03:26+0000\n"
+"POT-Creation-Date: 2019-04-28 11:56+0000\n"
"PO-Revision-Date: 2017-12-25 00:07+0200\n"
"Last-Translator: Besnik Bleta <address@hidden>\n"
"Language-Team: Albanian <address@hidden>\n"
@@ -284,14 +284,41 @@
#. type: Content of: <div><p>
msgid ""
-"Second, and more important in practice, many products containing computers "
+"Second, when a program's source code carries a weak license, one without "
+"copyleft, its executables can carry additional nonfree conditions. <a href="
+"\"https://code.visualstudio.com/License/\";>Microsoft does this with Visual "
+"Studio,</a> for example."
+msgstr ""
+
+#. type: Content of: <div><p>
+msgid ""
+"If these executables fully correspond to the released sources, they qualify "
+"as open source but not as free software. However, in that case users can "
+"compile the source code to make and distribute free executables."
+msgstr ""
+
+#. type: Content of: <div><p>
+#, fuzzy
+#| msgid ""
+#| "Second, and more important in practice, many products containing "
+#| "computers check signatures on their executable programs to block users "
+#| "from installing different executables; only one privileged company can "
+#| "make executables that can run in the device or can access its full "
+#| "capabilities. We call these devices “tyrants”, and the "
+#| "practice is called “tivoization” after the product (Tivo) "
+#| "where we first saw it. Even if the executable is made from free source "
+#| "code, the users cannot run modified versions of it, so the executable is "
+#| "nonfree."
+msgid ""
+"Finally, and most important in practice, many products containing computers "
"check signatures on their executable programs to block users from installing "
"different executables; only one privileged company can make executables that "
"can run in the device or can access its full capabilities. We call these "
"devices “tyrants”, and the practice is called “"
"tivoization” after the product (Tivo) where we first saw it. Even if "
-"the executable is made from free source code, the users cannot run modified "
-"versions of it, so the executable is nonfree."
+"the executable is made from free source code, and nominally carries a free "
+"license, the users cannot run modified versions of it, so the executable is "
+"de-facto nonfree."
msgstr ""
"Së dyti, dhe çâështë më e rëndësishmja, shumë produkte që
përmbajnë "
"kompjutera, kontrollojnë nënshkrimet në programe të ekzekutueshme, për
tâua "
@@ -306,11 +333,23 @@
#. type: Content of: <div><p>
msgid ""
-"The criteria for open source do not recognize this issue; they are concerned "
-"solely with the licensing of the source code. Thus, these unmodifiable "
-"executables, when made from source code such as Linux that is open source "
-"and free, are open source but not free. Many Android products contain "
-"nonfree tivoized executables of Linux."
+"Many Android products contain nonfree tivoized executables of Linux, even "
+"though its source code is under GNU GPL version 2. We designed GNU GPL "
+"version 3 to prohibit this practice."
+msgstr ""
+
+#. type: Content of: <div><p>
+#, fuzzy
+#| msgid ""
+#| "The criteria for open source do not recognize this issue; they are "
+#| "concerned solely with the licensing of the source code. Thus, these "
+#| "unmodifiable executables, when made from source code such as Linux that "
+#| "is open source and free, are open source but not free. Many Android "
+#| "products contain nonfree tivoized executables of Linux."
+msgid ""
+"The criteria for open source are concerned solely with the licensing of the "
+"source code. Thus, these nonfree executables, when made from source code "
+"such as Linux that is open source and free, are open source but not free."
msgstr ""
"Kriteri për burim të hapur nuk e njeh një çështje të tillë; ata
shqetësohen "
"vetëm për licencimin e kodit burim. Ndaj, këta të ekzekutueshëm të "
Index: po/open-source-misses-the-point.ta.po
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/po/open-source-misses-the-point.ta.po,v
retrieving revision 1.4
retrieving revision 1.5
diff -u -b -r1.4 -r1.5
--- po/open-source-misses-the-point.ta.po 2 Mar 2019 03:30:06 -0000
1.4
+++ po/open-source-misses-the-point.ta.po 28 Apr 2019 11:59:30 -0000
1.5
@@ -7,7 +7,7 @@
msgid ""
msgstr ""
"Project-Id-Version: open-source-misses-the-point.html\n"
-"POT-Creation-Date: 2019-03-02 03:26+0000\n"
+"POT-Creation-Date: 2019-04-28 11:56+0000\n"
"PO-Revision-Date: \n"
"Last-Translator: Thérèse Godefroy <godef.th AT free.fr>\n"
"Language-Team: web-translators <address@hidden>\n"
@@ -382,23 +382,44 @@
#. type: Content of: <div><p>
msgid ""
-"Second, and more important in practice, many products containing computers "
+"Second, when a program's source code carries a weak license, one without "
+"copyleft, its executables can carry additional nonfree conditions. <a href="
+"\"https://code.visualstudio.com/License/\";>Microsoft does this with Visual "
+"Studio,</a> for example."
+msgstr ""
+
+#. type: Content of: <div><p>
+msgid ""
+"If these executables fully correspond to the released sources, they qualify "
+"as open source but not as free software. However, in that case users can "
+"compile the source code to make and distribute free executables."
+msgstr ""
+
+#. type: Content of: <div><p>
+msgid ""
+"Finally, and most important in practice, many products containing computers "
"check signatures on their executable programs to block users from installing "
"different executables; only one privileged company can make executables that "
"can run in the device or can access its full capabilities. We call these "
"devices “tyrants”, and the practice is called “"
"tivoization” after the product (Tivo) where we first saw it. Even if "
-"the executable is made from free source code, the users cannot run modified "
-"versions of it, so the executable is nonfree."
+"the executable is made from free source code, and nominally carries a free "
+"license, the users cannot run modified versions of it, so the executable is "
+"de-facto nonfree."
+msgstr ""
+
+#. type: Content of: <div><p>
+msgid ""
+"Many Android products contain nonfree tivoized executables of Linux, even "
+"though its source code is under GNU GPL version 2. We designed GNU GPL "
+"version 3 to prohibit this practice."
msgstr ""
#. type: Content of: <div><p>
msgid ""
-"The criteria for open source do not recognize this issue; they are concerned "
-"solely with the licensing of the source code. Thus, these unmodifiable "
-"executables, when made from source code such as Linux that is open source "
-"and free, are open source but not free. Many Android products contain "
-"nonfree tivoized executables of Linux."
+"The criteria for open source are concerned solely with the licensing of the "
+"source code. Thus, these nonfree executables, when made from source code "
+"such as Linux that is open source and free, are open source but not free."
msgstr ""
#. type: Content of: <div><h3>
Index: po/open-source-misses-the-point.tr.po
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/po/open-source-misses-the-point.tr.po,v
retrieving revision 1.44
retrieving revision 1.45
diff -u -b -r1.44 -r1.45
--- po/open-source-misses-the-point.tr.po 2 Mar 2019 03:30:06 -0000
1.44
+++ po/open-source-misses-the-point.tr.po 28 Apr 2019 11:59:30 -0000
1.45
@@ -8,7 +8,7 @@
msgid ""
msgstr ""
"Project-Id-Version: open-source-misses-the-point.html\n"
-"POT-Creation-Date: 2019-03-02 03:26+0000\n"
+"POT-Creation-Date: 2019-04-28 11:56+0000\n"
"PO-Revision-Date: 2010-05-16 16:54+0200\n"
"Last-Translator: Tahir Emre Kalaycı <address@hidden>\n"
"Language-Team: Turkish <address@hidden>\n"
@@ -285,23 +285,44 @@
#. type: Content of: <div><p>
msgid ""
-"Second, and more important in practice, many products containing computers "
+"Second, when a program's source code carries a weak license, one without "
+"copyleft, its executables can carry additional nonfree conditions. <a href="
+"\"https://code.visualstudio.com/License/\";>Microsoft does this with Visual "
+"Studio,</a> for example."
+msgstr ""
+
+#. type: Content of: <div><p>
+msgid ""
+"If these executables fully correspond to the released sources, they qualify "
+"as open source but not as free software. However, in that case users can "
+"compile the source code to make and distribute free executables."
+msgstr ""
+
+#. type: Content of: <div><p>
+msgid ""
+"Finally, and most important in practice, many products containing computers "
"check signatures on their executable programs to block users from installing "
"different executables; only one privileged company can make executables that "
"can run in the device or can access its full capabilities. We call these "
"devices “tyrants”, and the practice is called “"
"tivoization” after the product (Tivo) where we first saw it. Even if "
-"the executable is made from free source code, the users cannot run modified "
-"versions of it, so the executable is nonfree."
+"the executable is made from free source code, and nominally carries a free "
+"license, the users cannot run modified versions of it, so the executable is "
+"de-facto nonfree."
+msgstr ""
+
+#. type: Content of: <div><p>
+msgid ""
+"Many Android products contain nonfree tivoized executables of Linux, even "
+"though its source code is under GNU GPL version 2. We designed GNU GPL "
+"version 3 to prohibit this practice."
msgstr ""
#. type: Content of: <div><p>
msgid ""
-"The criteria for open source do not recognize this issue; they are concerned "
-"solely with the licensing of the source code. Thus, these unmodifiable "
-"executables, when made from source code such as Linux that is open source "
-"and free, are open source but not free. Many Android products contain "
-"nonfree tivoized executables of Linux."
+"The criteria for open source are concerned solely with the licensing of the "
+"source code. Thus, these nonfree executables, when made from source code "
+"such as Linux that is open source and free, are open source but not free."
msgstr ""
#. type: Content of: <div><h3>
Index: po/open-source-misses-the-point.uk-diff.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/po/open-source-misses-the-point.uk-diff.html,v
retrieving revision 1.2
retrieving revision 1.3
diff -u -b -r1.2 -r1.3
--- po/open-source-misses-the-point.uk-diff.html 21 Apr 2019 10:30:27
-0000 1.2
+++ po/open-source-misses-the-point.uk-diff.html 28 Apr 2019 11:59:31
-0000 1.3
@@ -136,21 +136,36 @@
because its license does not allow making a modified version and using
it privately. Fortunately, few programs use such licenses.</p>
-<p>Second, and more important in practice, many products containing
+<p>Second, <span class="inserted"><ins><em>when a program's source code
carries a weak license, one
+without copyleft, its executables can carry additional nonfree
+conditions. <a href="https://code.visualstudio.com/License/">Microsoft
+does this with Visual Studio,</a> for example.</p>
+
+<p>If these executables fully correspond to the released sources, they
+qualify as open source but not as free software. However, in that
+case users can compile the source code to make</em></ins></span> and <span
class="removed"><del><strong>more</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>distribute free
+executables.</p>
+
+<p>Finally, and most</em></ins></span> important in practice, many
products containing
computers check signatures on their executable programs to block users
from installing different executables; only one privileged company can
make executables that can run in the device or can access its full
capabilities. We call these devices “tyrants”, and the
practice is called “tivoization” after the product (Tivo)
where we first saw it. Even if the executable is made from free
-source code, the users cannot run modified versions of it, so the
-executable is nonfree.</p>
+source code, <span class="inserted"><ins><em>and nominally carries a free
license,</em></ins></span> the users cannot
+run modified versions of it, so the executable is <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>de-facto</em></ins></span> nonfree.</p>
-<p>The criteria for open source do not recognize this issue; they are
-concerned solely with the licensing of the source code. Thus, these
-unmodifiable executables, when made from source code such as Linux
-that is open source and free, are open source but not free. Many
-Android products contain nonfree tivoized executables of Linux.</p>
+<span class="inserted"><ins><em><p>Many Android products contain nonfree
tivoized executables of
+Linux, even though its source code is under GNU GPL version 2. We
+designed GNU GPL version 3 to prohibit this
practice.</p></em></ins></span>
+
+<p>The criteria for open source <span class="removed"><del><strong>do
not recognize this issue; they</strong></del></span> are concerned solely with
the
+licensing of the source code. Thus, these
+<span class="removed"><del><strong>unmodifiable</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>nonfree</em></ins></span> executables, when
+made from source code such as Linux that is open source and free, are
+open source but not <span class="removed"><del><strong>free. Many
+Android products contain nonfree tivoized executables of
Linux.</p></strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>free.</p></em></ins></span>
<h3>Common Misunderstandings of “Free Software” and
“Open Source”</h3>
@@ -496,7 +511,7 @@
<p class="unprintable">Updated:
<!-- timestamp start -->
-$Date: 2019/04/21 10:30:27 $
+$Date: 2019/04/28 11:59:31 $
<!-- timestamp end -->
</p>
</div>
Index: po/open-source-misses-the-point.uk.po
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/po/open-source-misses-the-point.uk.po,v
retrieving revision 1.43
retrieving revision 1.44
diff -u -b -r1.43 -r1.44
--- po/open-source-misses-the-point.uk.po 2 Mar 2019 03:30:06 -0000
1.43
+++ po/open-source-misses-the-point.uk.po 28 Apr 2019 11:59:31 -0000
1.44
@@ -6,7 +6,7 @@
msgid ""
msgstr ""
"Project-Id-Version: open-source-misses-the-point.html\n"
-"POT-Creation-Date: 2019-03-02 03:26+0000\n"
+"POT-Creation-Date: 2019-04-28 11:56+0000\n"
"PO-Revision-Date: 2016-08-04 07:30+0200\n"
"Last-Translator: Andriy Bandura <address@hidden>\n"
"Language-Team: Ukrainian <>\n"
@@ -288,14 +288,41 @@
#. type: Content of: <div><p>
msgid ""
-"Second, and more important in practice, many products containing computers "
+"Second, when a program's source code carries a weak license, one without "
+"copyleft, its executables can carry additional nonfree conditions. <a href="
+"\"https://code.visualstudio.com/License/\";>Microsoft does this with Visual "
+"Studio,</a> for example."
+msgstr ""
+
+#. type: Content of: <div><p>
+msgid ""
+"If these executables fully correspond to the released sources, they qualify "
+"as open source but not as free software. However, in that case users can "
+"compile the source code to make and distribute free executables."
+msgstr ""
+
+#. type: Content of: <div><p>
+#, fuzzy
+#| msgid ""
+#| "Second, and more important in practice, many products containing "
+#| "computers check signatures on their executable programs to block users "
+#| "from installing different executables; only one privileged company can "
+#| "make executables that can run in the device or can access its full "
+#| "capabilities. We call these devices “tyrants”, and the "
+#| "practice is called “tivoization” after the product (Tivo) "
+#| "where we first saw it. Even if the executable is made from free source "
+#| "code, the users cannot run modified versions of it, so the executable is "
+#| "nonfree."
+msgid ""
+"Finally, and most important in practice, many products containing computers "
"check signatures on their executable programs to block users from installing "
"different executables; only one privileged company can make executables that "
"can run in the device or can access its full capabilities. We call these "
"devices “tyrants”, and the practice is called “"
"tivoization” after the product (Tivo) where we first saw it. Even if "
-"the executable is made from free source code, the users cannot run modified "
-"versions of it, so the executable is nonfree."
+"the executable is made from free source code, and nominally carries a free "
+"license, the users cannot run modified versions of it, so the executable is "
+"de-facto nonfree."
msgstr ""
"Ðо-дÑÑге, Ñо на пÑакÑиÑÑ Ð±ÑлÑÑ Ð²Ð°Ð¶Ð»Ð¸Ð²Ð¾,
багаÑо пÑодÑкÑи, Ñо мÑÑÑÑÑÑ "
"комп'ÑÑеÑи, пеÑевÑÑÑÑÑÑ Ð¿ÑдпиÑи на ÑайлаÑ
виконÑваниÑ
ними пÑогÑам Ñ Ð½Ðµ "
@@ -310,11 +337,23 @@
#. type: Content of: <div><p>
msgid ""
-"The criteria for open source do not recognize this issue; they are concerned "
-"solely with the licensing of the source code. Thus, these unmodifiable "
-"executables, when made from source code such as Linux that is open source "
-"and free, are open source but not free. Many Android products contain "
-"nonfree tivoized executables of Linux."
+"Many Android products contain nonfree tivoized executables of Linux, even "
+"though its source code is under GNU GPL version 2. We designed GNU GPL "
+"version 3 to prohibit this practice."
+msgstr ""
+
+#. type: Content of: <div><p>
+#, fuzzy
+#| msgid ""
+#| "The criteria for open source do not recognize this issue; they are "
+#| "concerned solely with the licensing of the source code. Thus, these "
+#| "unmodifiable executables, when made from source code such as Linux that "
+#| "is open source and free, are open source but not free. Many Android "
+#| "products contain nonfree tivoized executables of Linux."
+msgid ""
+"The criteria for open source are concerned solely with the licensing of the "
+"source code. Thus, these nonfree executables, when made from source code "
+"such as Linux that is open source and free, are open source but not free."
msgstr ""
"ÐÑиÑеÑÑÑ Ð²ÑдкÑиÑого ÐºÐ¾Ð´Ñ Ð½Ðµ визнаÑÑÑ ÑÑÑÑ
пÑоблеми; вони ÑозглÑдаÑÑÑ ÑÑлÑки "
"лÑÑензÑÐ²Ð°Ð½Ð½Ñ Ð²Ð¸Ñ
Ñдного кодÑ. Таким Ñином,
коли ÑÑ Ð´Ð²ÑÐ¹ÐºÐ¾Ð²Ñ Ñайли, ÑÐºÑ Ð½Ðµ "
Index: po/open-source-misses-the-point.zh-cn.po
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/po/open-source-misses-the-point.zh-cn.po,v
retrieving revision 1.56
retrieving revision 1.57
diff -u -b -r1.56 -r1.57
--- po/open-source-misses-the-point.zh-cn.po 2 Mar 2019 12:30:22 -0000
1.56
+++ po/open-source-misses-the-point.zh-cn.po 28 Apr 2019 11:59:31 -0000
1.57
@@ -7,7 +7,7 @@
msgid ""
msgstr ""
"Project-Id-Version: 1.0\n"
-"POT-Creation-Date: 2019-03-02 03:26+0000\n"
+"POT-Creation-Date: 2019-04-28 11:56+0000\n"
"PO-Revision-Date: 2019-03-02 19:37+0800\n"
"Last-Translator: Wensheng Xie <address@hidden>\n"
"Language-Team: Chinese <address@hidden>\n"
@@ -15,6 +15,7 @@
"MIME-Version: 1.0\n"
"Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8\n"
"Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit\n"
+"X-Outdated-Since: 2019-04-28 11:56+0000\n"
#. type: Content of: <title>
msgid ""
@@ -229,14 +230,41 @@
#. type: Content of: <div><p>
msgid ""
-"Second, and more important in practice, many products containing computers "
+"Second, when a program's source code carries a weak license, one without "
+"copyleft, its executables can carry additional nonfree conditions. <a href="
+"\"https://code.visualstudio.com/License/\";>Microsoft does this with Visual "
+"Studio,</a> for example."
+msgstr ""
+
+#. type: Content of: <div><p>
+msgid ""
+"If these executables fully correspond to the released sources, they qualify "
+"as open source but not as free software. However, in that case users can "
+"compile the source code to make and distribute free executables."
+msgstr ""
+
+#. type: Content of: <div><p>
+#, fuzzy
+#| msgid ""
+#| "Second, and more important in practice, many products containing "
+#| "computers check signatures on their executable programs to block users "
+#| "from installing different executables; only one privileged company can "
+#| "make executables that can run in the device or can access its full "
+#| "capabilities. We call these devices “tyrants”, and the "
+#| "practice is called “tivoization” after the product (Tivo) "
+#| "where we first saw it. Even if the executable is made from free source "
+#| "code, the users cannot run modified versions of it, so the executable is "
+#| "nonfree."
+msgid ""
+"Finally, and most important in practice, many products containing computers "
"check signatures on their executable programs to block users from installing "
"different executables; only one privileged company can make executables that "
"can run in the device or can access its full capabilities. We call these "
"devices “tyrants”, and the practice is called “"
"tivoization” after the product (Tivo) where we first saw it. Even if "
-"the executable is made from free source code, the users cannot run modified "
-"versions of it, so the executable is nonfree."
+"the executable is made from free source code, and nominally carries a free "
+"license, the users cannot run modified versions of it, so the executable is "
+"de-facto nonfree."
msgstr ""
"å¦å¤ï¼å®é
æä½æ¶è¿ææ´éè¦çä¸ç¹ãå¾å¤äº§å带ææ£æµå¯æ§è¡æ件ç¾ååè½ç计ç®"
"æºï¼å®ä¼ç¦æ¢ç¨æ·å®è£
æè¿è¡ä¿®æ¹åçå¯æ§è¡æ件ï¼èåªæä¸å®¶ç¹æå
¬å¸æè½ç产å¯æ§"
@@ -248,11 +276,23 @@
#. type: Content of: <div><p>
msgid ""
-"The criteria for open source do not recognize this issue; they are concerned "
-"solely with the licensing of the source code. Thus, these unmodifiable "
-"executables, when made from source code such as Linux that is open source "
-"and free, are open source but not free. Many Android products contain "
-"nonfree tivoized executables of Linux."
+"Many Android products contain nonfree tivoized executables of Linux, even "
+"though its source code is under GNU GPL version 2. We designed GNU GPL "
+"version 3 to prohibit this practice."
+msgstr ""
+
+#. type: Content of: <div><p>
+#, fuzzy
+#| msgid ""
+#| "The criteria for open source do not recognize this issue; they are "
+#| "concerned solely with the licensing of the source code. Thus, these "
+#| "unmodifiable executables, when made from source code such as Linux that "
+#| "is open source and free, are open source but not free. Many Android "
+#| "products contain nonfree tivoized executables of Linux."
+msgid ""
+"The criteria for open source are concerned solely with the licensing of the "
+"source code. Thus, these nonfree executables, when made from source code "
+"such as Linux that is open source and free, are open source but not free."
msgstr ""
"å¼æºçæ å没ææè¯å°è¿ä¸ªé®é¢ï¼å®ä»¬åªå
³å¿æºä»£ç
ç许å¯è¯ãè¿æ ·ä»¥æ¥ï¼è¿äºç¼è¯èª"
"诸å¦Linuxçå¼æºåèªç±è½¯ä»¶çå¯æ§è¡æ件ï¼åå°æªå¨ï¼æ¯å¼æºçï¼ä½ä¸æ¯èªç±çã许å¤"