www licenses/gpl-faq.ru.html licenses/po/gpl-fa...

[GNUN]

CVSROOT:        /web/www
Module name:    www
Changes by:     GNUN <gnun>     18/12/25 12:28:50

Modified files:
        licenses       : gpl-faq.ru.html 
        licenses/po    : gpl-faq.ru-en.html gpl-faq.ru.po 
        software       : recent-releases-include.ru.html 
        software/po    : recent-releases-include.ru.po 

Log message:
        Automatic update by GNUnited Nations.

CVSWeb URLs:
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/licenses/gpl-faq.ru.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.85&r2=1.86
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/licenses/po/gpl-faq.ru-en.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.67&r2=1.68
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/licenses/po/gpl-faq.ru.po?cvsroot=www&r1=1.155&r2=1.156
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/software/recent-releases-include.ru.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.1611&r2=1.1612
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/software/po/recent-releases-include.ru.po?cvsroot=www&r1=1.2273&r2=1.2274

Patches:
Index: licenses/gpl-faq.ru.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/licenses/gpl-faq.ru.html,v
retrieving revision 1.85
retrieving revision 1.86
diff -u -b -r1.85 -r1.86
--- licenses/gpl-faq.ru.html    15 Dec 2018 14:46:14 -0000      1.85
+++ licenses/gpl-faq.ru.html    25 Dec 2018 17:28:49 -0000      1.86
@@ -3900,7 +3900,7 @@
 <p class="unprintable"><!-- timestamp start -->
 Обновлено:
 
-$Date: 2018/12/15 14:46:14 $
+$Date: 2018/12/25 17:28:49 $
 
 <!-- timestamp end -->
 </p>

Index: licenses/po/gpl-faq.ru-en.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/licenses/po/gpl-faq.ru-en.html,v
retrieving revision 1.67
retrieving revision 1.68
diff -u -b -r1.67 -r1.68
--- licenses/po/gpl-faq.ru-en.html      15 Dec 2018 14:46:18 -0000      1.67
+++ licenses/po/gpl-faq.ru-en.html      25 Dec 2018 17:28:49 -0000      1.68
@@ -80,7 +80,7 @@
   
     <li><a href="#AssignCopyright">Why does the FSF require that
     contributors to FSF-copyrighted programs assign copyright to the
-    FSF?  If I hold copyright on a GPL'ed program, should I do this,
+    FSF?  If I hold copyright on a GPLed program, should I do this,
     too?  If so, how?</a></li>
   
     <li><a href="#ModifyGPL">Can I modify the GPL and make a modified
@@ -108,7 +108,7 @@
 
     <li><a href="#WhatDoesWrittenOfferValid">What does &ldquo;written offer
     valid for any third party&rdquo; mean in GPLv2? Does that mean everyone
-    in the world can get the source to any GPL'ed program no matter
+    in the world can get the source to any GPLed program no matter
     what?</a></li>
 
     <li><a href="#TheGPLSaysModifiedVersions">The GPL says that modified
@@ -127,7 +127,7 @@
     and/or notify me?</a></li>
   
     <li><a href="#DoesTheGPLRequireAvailabilityToPublic">If I distribute
-    GPL'd software for a fee, am I required to also make it available to
+    GPLed software for a fee, am I required to also make it available to
     the public without a charge?</a></li>
   
     <li><a href="#DoesTheGPLAllowNDA">Does the GPL allow me to
@@ -187,7 +187,7 @@
   
     <li><a href="#AssignCopyright">Why does the FSF require that
     contributors to FSF-copyrighted programs assign copyright to the
-    FSF?  If I hold copyright on a GPL'ed program, should I do this,
+    FSF?  If I hold copyright on a GPLed program, should I do this,
     too?  If so, how?</a></li>
   
     <li><a href="#GPLCommercially">If I use a piece of software that has
@@ -410,12 +410,12 @@
     GPL?</a></li>
 
     <li><a href="#CompanyGPLCostsMoney">I just found out that a company
-    has a copy of a GPL'ed program, and it costs money to get it.
+    has a copy of a GPLed program, and it costs money to get it.
     Aren't they violating the GPL by not making it available on the
     Internet?</a></li>
 
     <li><a href="#UnreleasedMods">A company is running a modified
-    version of a GPL'ed program on a web site.  Does the GPL say they
+    version of a GPLed program on a web site.  Does the GPL say they
     must release their modified sources?</a></li>
 
     <li><a href="#UnreleasedModsAGPL">A company is running a modified
@@ -570,7 +570,7 @@
     (not the LGPL), does that mean that any software which uses it has to
     be under the GPL or a GPL-compatible license?</a></li>
   
-    <li><a href="#LinkingWithGPL">You have a GPL'ed program that I'd
+    <li><a href="#LinkingWithGPL">You have a GPLed program that I'd
     like to link with my code to build a proprietary program.  Does the
     fact that I link with your program mean I have to GPL my
     program?</a></li>
@@ -648,7 +648,7 @@
     I combine or link Q with a GPL-covered program?</a></li>
 
     <li><a href="#OOPLang">In an object-oriented language such as Java,
-    if I use a class that is GPL'ed without modifying, and subclass it,
+    if I use a class that is GPLed without modifying, and subclass it,
     in what way does the GPL affect the larger program?</a></li>
 
     <li><a href="#NonfreeDriverKernelLinux">Does distributing a
@@ -687,14 +687,14 @@
     GPL?</a></li>
   
     <li><a href="#HeardOtherLicense">I heard that someone got a copy of
-    a GPL'ed program under another license.  Is this possible?</a></li>
+    a GPLed program under another license.  Is this possible?</a></li>
   
     <li><a href="#DeveloperViolate">Is the developer of a GPL-covered
     program bound by the GPL?  Could the developer's actions ever be a
     violation of the GPL?</a></li>
   
     <li><a href="#CompanyGPLCostsMoney">I just found out that a company
-    has a copy of a GPL'ed program, and it costs money to get it.
+    has a copy of a GPLed program, and it costs money to get it.
     Aren't they violating the GPL by not making it available on the
     Internet?</a></li>
 
@@ -861,7 +861,7 @@
 
 <dt id="WhatDoesWrittenOfferValid">What does &ldquo;written offer
     valid for any third party&rdquo; mean in GPLv2?  Does that mean
-    everyone in the world can get the source to any GPL'ed program
+    everyone in the world can get the source to any GPLed program
     no matter what?
  <span class="anchor-reference-id">(<a href="#WhatDoesWrittenOfferValid"
  >#WhatDoesWrittenOfferValid</a>)</span></dt>
@@ -988,7 +988,7 @@
 
 
 <dt id="DoesTheGPLRequireAvailabilityToPublic">If I
-    distribute GPL'd software for a fee, am I required to also make
+    distribute GPLed software for a fee, am I required to also make
     it available to the public without a charge?
  <span class="anchor-reference-id">
  (<a href="#DoesTheGPLRequireAvailabilityToPublic"
@@ -1070,7 +1070,7 @@
 <dd><p> No, this is not permitted under the terms of the GPL. While we
 recognize that proper citation is an important part of academic
 publications, citation cannot be added as an additional requirement to
-the GPL. Requiring citation in research papers which made use of GPL'd
+the GPL. Requiring citation in research papers which made use of GPLed
 software goes beyond what would be an acceptable additional
 requirement under section 7(b) of GPLv3, and therefore would be
 considered an additional restriction under Section 7 of the GPL. And
@@ -1441,7 +1441,7 @@
 
 
 <dt id="HeardOtherLicense">I heard that someone got a copy
-    of a GPL'ed program under another license.  Is this possible?
+    of a GPLed program under another license.  Is this possible?
  <span class="anchor-reference-id">(<a href="#HeardOtherLicense"
  >#HeardOtherLicense</a>)</span></dt>
 <dd><p>
@@ -1584,15 +1584,15 @@
 version: v2, v2.1 or v3): </p>
 
 <blockquote>
-  <p>(1) If you statically link against an LGPL'd library, you must
+  <p>(1) If you statically link against an LGPLed library, you must
 also provide your application in an object (not necessarily source)
 format, so that a user has the opportunity to modify the library and
 relink the application.</p>
 
-<p>(2) If you dynamically link against an LGPL'd library <em>already
+<p>(2) If you dynamically link against an LGPLed library <em>already
 present on the user's computer</em>, you need not convey the library's
 source. On the other hand, if you yourself convey the executable
-LGPL'd library along with your application, whether linked with
+LGPLed library along with your application, whether linked with
 statically or dynamically, you must also convey the library's sources,
 in one of the ways for which the LGPL provides.</p>
 </blockquote></dd>
@@ -1718,7 +1718,7 @@
 many Java classes.  These libraries and the programs that call them
 are always dynamically linked together.</p>
 
-<p>A consequence is that if you choose to use GPL'd Perl modules or Java
+<p>A consequence is that if you choose to use GPLed Perl modules or Java
 classes in your program, you must release the program in a
 GPL-compatible way, regardless of the license used in the Perl or Java
 interpreter that the combined Perl or Java program will run on.
@@ -1856,7 +1856,7 @@
 writing free software that uses a nonfree library.</a></p></dd>
 
 
-<dt id="LinkingWithGPL">You have a GPL'ed program that I'd like
+<dt id="LinkingWithGPL">You have a GPLed program that I'd like
     to link with my code to build a proprietary program.  Does the fact
     that I link with your program mean I have to GPL my program?
  <span class="anchor-reference-id">(<a href="#LinkingWithGPL"
@@ -2013,7 +2013,7 @@
 
 <dt id="AssignCopyright">Why does
     the FSF require that contributors to FSF-copyrighted programs assign
-    copyright to the FSF?  If I hold copyright on a GPL'ed program, should
+    copyright to the FSF?  If I hold copyright on a GPLed program, should
     I do this, too?  If so, how?
  <span class="anchor-reference-id">(<a href="#AssignCopyright"
  >#AssignCopyright</a>)</span></dt>
@@ -2409,7 +2409,7 @@
 
 
 <dt id="UnreleasedMods">A company
-    is running a modified version of a GPL'ed program on a web site.
+    is running a modified version of a GPLed program on a web site.
     Does the GPL say they must release their modified sources?
  <span class="anchor-reference-id">(<a href="#UnreleasedMods"
  >#UnreleasedMods</a>)</span></dt>
@@ -2422,7 +2422,7 @@
 href="#UnreleasedModsAGPL">GNU Affero GPL</a>.</p>
 
 <p>Compare this to a situation where the web site contains or links to
-separate GPL'ed programs that are distributed to the user when they
+separate GPLed programs that are distributed to the user when they
 visit the web site (often written in <a
 href="/philosophy/javascript-trap.html">JavaScript</a>, but other
 languages are used as well). In this situation the source code for the
@@ -2854,13 +2854,13 @@
 
 
 <dt id="OOPLang">In an object-oriented language such as Java,
-    if I use a class that is GPL'ed without modifying, and subclass it,
+    if I use a class that is GPLed without modifying, and subclass it,
     in what way does the GPL affect the larger program?
  <span class="anchor-reference-id">(<a href="#OOPLang"
  >#OOPLang</a>)</span></dt>
 <dd><p>
 Subclassing is creating a derivative work.  Therefore, the terms of
-the GPL affect the whole program where you create a subclass of a GPL'ed
+the GPL affect the whole program where you create a subclass of a GPLed
 class.
 </p></dd>
 
@@ -2897,7 +2897,7 @@
 
 
 <dt id="CompanyGPLCostsMoney">I just found out that a company has a
-    copy of a GPL'ed program, and it costs money to get it.  Aren't they
+    copy of a GPLed program, and it costs money to get it.  Aren't they
     violating the GPL by not making it available on the Internet?
  <span class="anchor-reference-id">(<a href="#CompanyGPLCostsMoney"
  >#CompanyGPLCostsMoney</a>)</span></dt>
@@ -2987,7 +2987,7 @@
 software.</p></dd>
 
 
-<dt id="ExportWarranties">Some distributors of GPL'd software
+<dt id="ExportWarranties">Some distributors of GPLed software
     require me in their umbrella EULAs or as part of their downloading
     process to &ldquo;represent and warrant&rdquo; that I am located in
     the US or that I intend to distribute the software in compliance with
@@ -3941,7 +3941,7 @@
 
 <p class="unprintable">Updated:
 <!-- timestamp start -->
-$Date: 2018/12/15 14:46:18 $
+$Date: 2018/12/25 17:28:49 $
 <!-- timestamp end -->
 </p>
 </div>

Index: licenses/po/gpl-faq.ru.po
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/licenses/po/gpl-faq.ru.po,v
retrieving revision 1.155
retrieving revision 1.156
diff -u -b -r1.155 -r1.156
--- licenses/po/gpl-faq.ru.po   25 Dec 2018 17:18:45 -0000      1.155
+++ licenses/po/gpl-faq.ru.po   25 Dec 2018 17:28:49 -0000      1.156
@@ -19,7 +19,6 @@
 "MIME-Version: 1.0\n"
 "Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8\n"
 "Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit\n"
-"X-Outdated-Since: 2018-12-25 15:26+0000\n"
 
 #. type: Content of: <title>
 msgid ""
@@ -118,13 +117,6 @@
 msgstr "<a href=\"#WhoHasThePower\">Кто вправе требовать 
соблюдения GPL?</a>"
 
 #. type: Content of: <ul><li>
-# | <a href=\"#AssignCopyright\">Why does the FSF require that contributors to
-# | FSF-copyrighted programs assign copyright to the FSF? If I hold copyright
-# | on a GPL[-'-]ed program, should I do this, too? If so, how?</a>
-#| msgid ""
-#| "<a href=\"#AssignCopyright\">Why does the FSF require that contributors "
-#| "to FSF-copyrighted programs assign copyright to the FSF? If I hold "
-#| "copyright on a GPL'ed program, should I do this, too? If so, how?</a>"
 msgid ""
 "<a href=\"#AssignCopyright\">Why does the FSF require that contributors to "
 "FSF-copyrighted programs assign copyright to the FSF? If I hold copyright on "
@@ -186,13 +178,6 @@
 "под GPL, могу ли я требовать, чтобы он дал 
мне копию?</a>"
 
 #. type: Content of: <ul><li>
-# | <a href=\"#WhatDoesWrittenOfferValid\">What does &ldquo;written offer
-# | valid for any third party&rdquo; mean in GPLv2? Does that mean everyone in
-# | the world can get the source to any GPL[-'-]ed program no matter what?</a>
-#| msgid ""
-#| "<a href=\"#WhatDoesWrittenOfferValid\">What does &ldquo;written offer "
-#| "valid for any third party&rdquo; mean in GPLv2? Does that mean everyone "
-#| "in the world can get the source to any GPL'ed program no matter what?</a>"
 msgid ""
 "<a href=\"#WhatDoesWrittenOfferValid\">What does &ldquo;written offer valid "
 "for any third party&rdquo; mean in GPLv2? Does that mean everyone in the "
@@ -239,13 +224,6 @@
 "всякий, кто получает программу, платил мне 
или извещал меня?</a>"
 
 #. type: Content of: <ul><li>
-# | <a href=\"#DoesTheGPLRequireAvailabilityToPublic\">If I distribute
-# | GPL[-'-]{+e+}d software for a fee, am I required to also make it available
-# | to the public without a charge?</a>
-#| msgid ""
-#| "<a href=\"#DoesTheGPLRequireAvailabilityToPublic\">If I distribute GPL'd "
-#| "software for a fee, am I required to also make it available to the public "
-#| "without a charge?</a>"
 msgid ""
 "<a href=\"#DoesTheGPLRequireAvailabilityToPublic\">If I distribute GPLed "
 "software for a fee, am I required to also make it available to the public "
@@ -847,13 +825,6 @@
 "саму первоначальную версию&nbsp;&mdash; 
нельзя?</a>"
 
 #. type: Content of: <ul><li>
-# | <a href=\"#CompanyGPLCostsMoney\">I just found out that a company has a
-# | copy of a GPL[-'-]ed program, and it costs money to get it.  Aren't they
-# | violating the GPL by not making it available on the Internet?</a>
-#| msgid ""
-#| "<a href=\"#CompanyGPLCostsMoney\">I just found out that a company has a "
-#| "copy of a GPL'ed program, and it costs money to get it.  Aren't they "
-#| "violating the GPL by not making it available on the Internet?</a>"
 msgid ""
 "<a href=\"#CompanyGPLCostsMoney\">I just found out that a company has a copy "
 "of a GPLed program, and it costs money to get it.  Aren't they violating the "
@@ -864,13 +835,6 @@
 "деньги. Не нарушают ли они GPL, не делая ее 
доступной по Интернету?</a>"
 
 #. type: Content of: <ul><li>
-# | <a href=\"#UnreleasedMods\">A company is running a modified version of a
-# | GPL[-'-]ed program on a web site.  Does the GPL say they must release
-# | their modified sources?</a>
-#| msgid ""
-#| "<a href=\"#UnreleasedMods\">A company is running a modified version of a "
-#| "GPL'ed program on a web site.  Does the GPL say they must release their "
-#| "modified sources?</a>"
 msgid ""
 "<a href=\"#UnreleasedMods\">A company is running a modified version of a "
 "GPLed program on a web site.  Does the GPL say they must release their "
@@ -1187,13 +1151,6 @@
 "выпускаться на условиях GPL или 
совместимой с GPL лицензии?</a>"
 
 #. type: Content of: <ul><li>
-# | <a href=\"#LinkingWithGPL\">You have a GPL[-'-]ed program that I'd like to
-# | link with my code to build a proprietary program.  Does the fact that I
-# | link with your program mean I have to GPL my program?</a>
-#| msgid ""
-#| "<a href=\"#LinkingWithGPL\">You have a GPL'ed program that I'd like to "
-#| "link with my code to build a proprietary program.  Does the fact that I "
-#| "link with your program mean I have to GPL my program?</a>"
 msgid ""
 "<a href=\"#LinkingWithGPL\">You have a GPLed program that I'd like to link "
 "with my code to build a proprietary program.  Does the fact that I link with "
@@ -1364,13 +1321,6 @@
 "или связывать М с программой под GPL?</a>"
 
 #. type: Content of: <ul><li>
-# | <a href=\"#OOPLang\">In an object-oriented language such as Java, if I use
-# | a class that is GPL[-'-]ed without modifying, and subclass it, in what way
-# | does the GPL affect the larger program?</a>
-#| msgid ""
-#| "<a href=\"#OOPLang\">In an object-oriented language such as Java, if I "
-#| "use a class that is GPL'ed without modifying, and subclass it, in what "
-#| "way does the GPL affect the larger program?</a>"
 msgid ""
 "<a href=\"#OOPLang\">In an object-oriented language such as Java, if I use a "
 "class that is GPLed without modifying, and subclass it, in what way does the "
@@ -1447,11 +1397,6 @@
 "возможное нарушение GPL?</a>"
 
 #. type: Content of: <ul><li>
-# | <a href=\"#HeardOtherLicense\">I heard that someone got a copy of a
-# | GPL[-'-]ed program under another license.  Is this possible?</a>
-#| msgid ""
-#| "<a href=\"#HeardOtherLicense\">I heard that someone got a copy of a "
-#| "GPL'ed program under another license.  Is this possible?</a>"
 msgid ""
 "<a href=\"#HeardOtherLicense\">I heard that someone got a copy of a GPLed "
 "program under another license.  Is this possible?</a>"
@@ -1798,16 +1743,6 @@
 "распространять программу, если таково его 
решение."
 
 #. type: Content of: <dl><dt>
-# | What does &ldquo;written offer valid for any third party&rdquo; mean in
-# | GPLv2? Does that mean everyone in the world can get the source to any
-# | GPL[-'-]ed program no matter what? <span class=\"anchor-reference-id\">(<a
-# | href=\"#WhatDoesWrittenOfferValid\" >#WhatDoesWrittenOfferValid</a>)</span>
-#| msgid ""
-#| "What does &ldquo;written offer valid for any third party&rdquo; mean in "
-#| "GPLv2? Does that mean everyone in the world can get the source to any "
-#| "GPL'ed program no matter what? <span class=\"anchor-reference-id\">(<a "
-#| "href=\"#WhatDoesWrittenOfferValid\" >#WhatDoesWrittenOfferValid</a>)</"
-#| "span>"
 msgid ""
 "What does &ldquo;written offer valid for any third party&rdquo; mean in "
 "GPLv2? Does that mean everyone in the world can get the source to any GPLed "
@@ -2065,16 +2000,6 @@
 "платили вам, когда они получают копию <em>от 
кого-то другого</em>."
 
 #. type: Content of: <dl><dt>
-# | If I distribute GPL[-'-]{+e+}d software for a fee, am I required to also
-# | make it available to the public without a charge? <span
-# | class=\"anchor-reference-id\"> (<a
-# | href=\"#DoesTheGPLRequireAvailabilityToPublic\"
-# | >#DoesTheGPLRequireAvailabilityToPublic</a>)</span>
-#| msgid ""
-#| "If I distribute GPL'd software for a fee, am I required to also make it "
-#| "available to the public without a charge? <span class=\"anchor-reference-"
-#| "id\"> (<a href=\"#DoesTheGPLRequireAvailabilityToPublic\" "
-#| ">#DoesTheGPLRequireAvailabilityToPublic</a>)</span>"
 msgid ""
 "If I distribute GPLed software for a fee, am I required to also make it "
 "available to the public without a charge? <span class=\"anchor-reference-id"
@@ -2242,27 +2167,6 @@
 "\"#RequireCitation\">#RequireCitation</a>)</span>"
 
 #. type: Content of: <dl><dd><p>
-# | No, this is not permitted under the terms of the GPL. While we recognize
-# | that proper citation is an important part of academic publications,
-# | citation cannot be added as an additional requirement to the GPL.
-# | Requiring citation in research papers which made use of GPL[-'-]{+e+}d
-# | software goes beyond what would be an acceptable additional requirement
-# | under section 7(b) of GPLv3, and therefore would be considered an
-# | additional restriction under Section 7 of the GPL. And copyright law does
-# | not allow you to place such a <a href=\"#GPLOutput\">requirement on the
-# | output of software</a>, regardless of whether it is licensed under the
-# | terms of the GPL or some other license.
-#| msgid ""
-#| "No, this is not permitted under the terms of the GPL. While we recognize "
-#| "that proper citation is an important part of academic publications, "
-#| "citation cannot be added as an additional requirement to the GPL. "
-#| "Requiring citation in research papers which made use of GPL'd software "
-#| "goes beyond what would be an acceptable additional requirement under "
-#| "section 7(b) of GPLv3, and therefore would be considered an additional "
-#| "restriction under Section 7 of the GPL. And copyright law does not allow "
-#| "you to place such a <a href=\"#GPLOutput\">requirement on the output of "
-#| "software</a>, regardless of whether it is licensed under the terms of the "
-#| "GPL or some other license."
 msgid ""
 "No, this is not permitted under the terms of the GPL. While we recognize "
 "that proper citation is an important part of academic publications, citation "
@@ -3040,13 +2944,6 @@
 "См. страницу с <a 
href=\"/licenses/gpl-howto.html\">указаниями по GPL</a>."
 
 #. type: Content of: <dl><dt>
-# | I heard that someone got a copy of a GPL[-'-]ed program under another
-# | license.  Is this possible? <span class=\"anchor-reference-id\">(<a
-# | href=\"#HeardOtherLicense\" >#HeardOtherLicense</a>)</span>
-#| msgid ""
-#| "I heard that someone got a copy of a GPL'ed program under another "
-#| "license.  Is this possible? <span class=\"anchor-reference-id\">(<a href="
-#| "\"#HeardOtherLicense\" >#HeardOtherLicense</a>)</span>"
 msgid ""
 "I heard that someone got a copy of a GPLed program under another license.  "
 "Is this possible? <span class=\"anchor-reference-id\">(<a href="
@@ -3356,15 +3253,6 @@
 "момент версии: 2, 2.1 или 3),"
 
 #. type: Content of: <dl><dd><blockquote><p>
-# | (1) If you statically link against an LGPL[-'-]{+e+}d library, you must
-# | also provide your application in an object (not necessarily source) 
-# | format, so that a user has the opportunity to modify the library and
-# | relink the application.
-#| msgid ""
-#| "(1) If you statically link against an LGPL'd library, you must also "
-#| "provide your application in an object (not necessarily source)  format, "
-#| "so that a user has the opportunity to modify the library and relink the "
-#| "application."
 msgid ""
 "(1) If you statically link against an LGPLed library, you must also provide "
 "your application in an object (not necessarily source)  format, so that a "
@@ -3376,19 +3264,6 @@
 "библиотеку и перекомпоновать приложение."
 
 #. type: Content of: <dl><dd><blockquote><p>
-# | (2) If you dynamically link against an LGPL[-'-]{+e+}d library <em>already
-# | present on the user's computer</em>, you need not convey the library's
-# | source. On the other hand, if you yourself convey the executable
-# | LGPL[-'-]{+e+}d library along with your application, whether linked with
-# | statically or dynamically, you must also convey the library's sources, in
-# | one of the ways for which the LGPL provides.
-#| msgid ""
-#| "(2) If you dynamically link against an LGPL'd library <em>already present "
-#| "on the user's computer</em>, you need not convey the library's source. On "
-#| "the other hand, if you yourself convey the executable LGPL'd library "
-#| "along with your application, whether linked with statically or "
-#| "dynamically, you must also convey the library's sources, in one of the "
-#| "ways for which the LGPL provides."
 msgid ""
 "(2) If you dynamically link against an LGPLed library <em>already present on "
 "the user's computer</em>, you need not convey the library's source. On the "
@@ -3655,15 +3530,6 @@
 "программы, которые их вызывают, всегда 
динамически компонуются друг с другом."
 
 #. type: Content of: <dl><dd><p>
-# | A consequence is that if you choose to use GPL[-'-]{+e+}d Perl modules or
-# | Java classes in your program, you must release the program in a
-# | GPL-compatible way, regardless of the license used in the Perl or Java
-# | interpreter that the combined Perl or Java program will run on.
-#| msgid ""
-#| "A consequence is that if you choose to use GPL'd Perl modules or Java "
-#| "classes in your program, you must release the program in a GPL-compatible "
-#| "way, regardless of the license used in the Perl or Java interpreter that "
-#| "the combined Perl or Java program will run on."
 msgid ""
 "A consequence is that if you choose to use GPLed Perl modules or Java "
 "classes in your program, you must release the program in a GPL-compatible "
@@ -3940,15 +3806,6 @@
 "требований на главную программу."
 
 #. type: Content of: <dl><dt>
-# | You have a GPL[-'-]ed program that I'd like to link with my code to build
-# | a proprietary program.  Does the fact that I link with your program mean I
-# | have to GPL my program? <span class=\"anchor-reference-id\">(<a
-# | href=\"#LinkingWithGPL\" >#LinkingWithGPL</a>)</span>
-#| msgid ""
-#| "You have a GPL'ed program that I'd like to link with my code to build a "
-#| "proprietary program.  Does the fact that I link with your program mean I "
-#| "have to GPL my program? <span class=\"anchor-reference-id\">(<a href="
-#| "\"#LinkingWithGPL\" >#LinkingWithGPL</a>)</span>"
 msgid ""
 "You have a GPLed program that I'd like to link with my code to build a "
 "proprietary program.  Does the fact that I link with your program mean I "
@@ -4293,15 +4150,6 @@
 "влияет."
 
 #. type: Content of: <dl><dt>
-# | Why does the FSF require that contributors to FSF-copyrighted programs
-# | assign copyright to the FSF? If I hold copyright on a GPL[-'-]ed program,
-# | should I do this, too? If so, how? <span class=\"anchor-reference-id\">(<a
-# | href=\"#AssignCopyright\" >#AssignCopyright</a>)</span>
-#| msgid ""
-#| "Why does the FSF require that contributors to FSF-copyrighted programs "
-#| "assign copyright to the FSF? If I hold copyright on a GPL'ed program, "
-#| "should I do this, too? If so, how? <span class=\"anchor-reference-id\">"
-#| "(<a href=\"#AssignCopyright\" >#AssignCopyright</a>)</span>"
 msgid ""
 "Why does the FSF require that contributors to FSF-copyrighted programs "
 "assign copyright to the FSF? If I hold copyright on a GPLed program, should "
@@ -5141,15 +4989,6 @@
 "невыпущенной) версией компилятора."
 
 #. type: Content of: <dl><dt>
-# | A company is running a modified version of a GPL[-'-]ed program on a web
-# | site.  Does the GPL say they must release their modified sources? <span
-# | class=\"anchor-reference-id\">(<a href=\"#UnreleasedMods\"
-# | >#UnreleasedMods</a>)</span>
-#| msgid ""
-#| "A company is running a modified version of a GPL'ed program on a web "
-#| "site.  Does the GPL say they must release their modified sources? <span "
-#| "class=\"anchor-reference-id\">(<a href=\"#UnreleasedMods\" "
-#| ">#UnreleasedMods</a>)</span>"
 msgid ""
 "A company is running a modified version of a GPLed program on a web site.  "
 "Does the GPL say they must release their modified sources? <span class="
@@ -5176,20 +5015,6 @@
 "на условиях <a href=\"#UnreleasedModsAGPL\">GNU GPL 
Афферо</a>."
 
 #. type: Content of: <dl><dd><p>
-# | Compare this to a situation where the web site contains or links to
-# | separate GPL[-'-]ed programs that are distributed to the user when they
-# | visit the web site (often written in <a
-# | href=\"/philosophy/javascript-trap.html\">JavaScript</a>, but other
-# | languages are used as well). In this situation the source code for the
-# | programs being distributed must be released to the user under the terms of
-# | the GPL.
-#| msgid ""
-#| "Compare this to a situation where the web site contains or links to "
-#| "separate GPL'ed programs that are distributed to the user when they visit "
-#| "the web site (often written in <a href=\"/philosophy/javascript-trap.html"
-#| "\">JavaScript</a>, but other languages are used as well). In this "
-#| "situation the source code for the programs being distributed must be "
-#| "released to the user under the terms of the GPL."
 msgid ""
 "Compare this to a situation where the web site contains or links to separate "
 "GPLed programs that are distributed to the user when they visit the web site "
@@ -6094,15 +5919,6 @@
 "другой вопрос.</a>"
 
 #. type: Content of: <dl><dt>
-# | In an object-oriented language such as Java, if I use a class that is
-# | GPL[-'-]ed without modifying, and subclass it, in what way does the GPL
-# | affect the larger program? <span class=\"anchor-reference-id\">(<a
-# | href=\"#OOPLang\" >#OOPLang</a>)</span>
-#| msgid ""
-#| "In an object-oriented language such as Java, if I use a class that is "
-#| "GPL'ed without modifying, and subclass it, in what way does the GPL "
-#| "affect the larger program? <span class=\"anchor-reference-id\">(<a href="
-#| "\"#OOPLang\" >#OOPLang</a>)</span>"
 msgid ""
 "In an object-oriented language such as Java, if I use a class that is GPLed "
 "without modifying, and subclass it, in what way does the GPL affect the "
@@ -6115,13 +5931,6 @@
 "\"#OOPLang\" >#OOPLang</a>)</span>"
 
 #. type: Content of: <dl><dd><p>
-# | Subclassing is creating a derivative work.  Therefore, the terms of the
-# | GPL affect the whole program where you create a subclass of a GPL[-'-]ed
-# | class.
-#| msgid ""
-#| "Subclassing is creating a derivative work.  Therefore, the terms of the "
-#| "GPL affect the whole program where you create a subclass of a GPL'ed "
-#| "class."
 msgid ""
 "Subclassing is creating a derivative work.  Therefore, the terms of the GPL "
 "affect the whole program where you create a subclass of a GPLed class."
@@ -6198,15 +6007,6 @@
 "общества, то свои программы вам нужно 
делать свободными."
 
 #. type: Content of: <dl><dt>
-# | I just found out that a company has a copy of a GPL[-'-]ed program, and it
-# | costs money to get it.  Aren't they violating the GPL by not making it
-# | available on the Internet? <span class=\"anchor-reference-id\">(<a
-# | href=\"#CompanyGPLCostsMoney\" >#CompanyGPLCostsMoney</a>)</span>
-#| msgid ""
-#| "I just found out that a company has a copy of a GPL'ed program, and it "
-#| "costs money to get it.  Aren't they violating the GPL by not making it "
-#| "available on the Internet? <span class=\"anchor-reference-id\">(<a href="
-#| "\"#CompanyGPLCostsMoney\" >#CompanyGPLCostsMoney</a>)</span>"
 msgid ""
 "I just found out that a company has a copy of a GPLed program, and it costs "
 "money to get it.  Aren't they violating the GPL by not making it available "
@@ -6394,21 +6194,6 @@
 "установки."
 
 #. type: Content of: <dl><dt>
-# | Some distributors of GPL[-'-]{+e+}d software require me in their umbrella
-# | EULAs or as part of their downloading process to &ldquo;represent and
-# | warrant&rdquo; that I am located in the US or that I intend to distribute
-# | the software in compliance with relevant export control laws.  Why are
-# | they doing this and is it a violation of those distributors' obligations
-# | under GPL? <span class=\"anchor-reference-id\">(<a
-# | href=\"#ExportWarranties\" >#ExportWarranties</a>)</span>
-#| msgid ""
-#| "Some distributors of GPL'd software require me in their umbrella EULAs or "
-#| "as part of their downloading process to &ldquo;represent and "
-#| "warrant&rdquo; that I am located in the US or that I intend to distribute "
-#| "the software in compliance with relevant export control laws.  Why are "
-#| "they doing this and is it a violation of those distributors' obligations "
-#| "under GPL? <span class=\"anchor-reference-id\">(<a href="
-#| "\"#ExportWarranties\" >#ExportWarranties</a>)</span>"
 msgid ""
 "Some distributors of GPLed software require me in their umbrella EULAs or as "
 "part of their downloading process to &ldquo;represent and warrant&rdquo; "

Index: software/recent-releases-include.ru.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/software/recent-releases-include.ru.html,v
retrieving revision 1.1611
retrieving revision 1.1612
diff -u -b -r1.1611 -r1.1612
--- software/recent-releases-include.ru.html    24 Dec 2018 08:28:58 -0000      
1.1611
+++ software/recent-releases-include.ru.html    25 Dec 2018 17:28:50 -0000      
1.1612
@@ -1,10 +1,9 @@
 <ul>
-<li><strong>December 24, 2018</strong>
+<li><strong>24 декабря 2018</strong>
 <ul>
 <li><a
-href="http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/info-gnu/2018-12/msg00016.html";>GNU
-Linux-libre 4.20-gnu: Four.Two-Oh! Ho! Ho!</a>, <i>Alexandre Oliva</i>,
-<tt>02:51</tt></li>
+href="http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/info-gnu/2018-12/msg00016.html";>Вышел
+GNU Linux-libre 4.20-gnu</a>, <i>Александр Олива</i>, 
<tt>02:51</tt></li>
 </ul></li>
 <li><strong>23 декабря 2018</strong>
 <ul>

Index: software/po/recent-releases-include.ru.po
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/software/po/recent-releases-include.ru.po,v
retrieving revision 1.2273
retrieving revision 1.2274
diff -u -b -r1.2273 -r1.2274
--- software/po/recent-releases-include.ru.po   25 Dec 2018 17:18:47 -0000      
1.2273
+++ software/po/recent-releases-include.ru.po   25 Dec 2018 17:28:50 -0000      
1.2274
@@ -14,23 +14,12 @@
 "MIME-Version: 1.0\n"
 "Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8\n"
 "Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit\n"
-"X-Outdated-Since: 2018-12-24 08:27+0000\n"
 
 #. type: Content of: <ul><li>
-# | <strong>December 2[-3-]{+4+}, 2018</strong>
-#| msgid "<strong>December 23, 2018</strong>"
 msgid "<strong>December 24, 2018</strong>"
 msgstr "<strong>24 декабря 2018</strong>"
 
 #. type: Content of: <ul><li><ul><li>
-# | <a
-# | 
[-href=\"http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/info-gnu/2018-10/msg00002.html\";>GNU-]
-# | 
{+href=\"http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/info-gnu/2018-12/msg00016.html\";>GNU+}
-# | Linux-libre [-4.19-gnu</a>,-] {+4.20-gnu: Four.Two-Oh! Ho! Ho!</a>,+}
-# | <i>Alexandre Oliva</i>, [-<tt>16:12</tt>-] {+<tt>02:51</tt>+}
-#| msgid ""
-#| "<a href=\"http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/info-gnu/2018-10/msg00002.html";
-#| "\">GNU Linux-libre 4.19-gnu</a>, <i>Alexandre Oliva</i>, <tt>16:12</tt>"
 msgid ""
 "<a href=\"http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/info-gnu/2018-12/msg00016.html";
 "\">GNU Linux-libre 4.20-gnu: Four.Two-Oh! Ho! Ho!</a>, <i>Alexandre Oliva</"