[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
www/licenses gpl-faq.it.html po/gpl-faq.it-diff...
|
From: |
GNUN |
|
Subject: |
www/licenses gpl-faq.it.html po/gpl-faq.it-diff... |
|
Date: |
Mon, 7 May 2018 17:59:00 -0400 (EDT) |
CVSROOT: /web/www
Module name: www
Changes by: GNUN <gnun> 18/05/07 17:59:00
Modified files:
licenses : gpl-faq.it.html
licenses/po : gpl-faq.it-diff.html
Log message:
Automatic update by GNUnited Nations.
CVSWeb URLs:
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/licenses/gpl-faq.it.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.29&r2=1.30
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/licenses/po/gpl-faq.it-diff.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.3&r2=1.4
Patches:
Index: gpl-faq.it.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/licenses/gpl-faq.it.html,v
retrieving revision 1.29
retrieving revision 1.30
diff -u -b -r1.29 -r1.30
--- gpl-faq.it.html 20 Jan 2018 19:31:07 -0000 1.29
+++ gpl-faq.it.html 7 May 2018 21:58:59 -0000 1.30
@@ -1,4 +1,9 @@
-<!--#set var="ENGLISH_PAGE" value="/licenses/gpl-faq.en.html" -->
+<!--#set var="PO_FILE"
+ value='<a href="/licenses/po/gpl-faq.it.po">
+ https://www.gnu.org/licenses/po/gpl-faq.it.po</a>'
+ --><!--#set var="ORIGINAL_FILE" value="/licenses/gpl-faq.html"
+ --><!--#set var="DIFF_FILE" value="/licenses/po/gpl-faq.it-diff.html"
+ --><!--#set var="OUTDATED_SINCE" value="2018-03-08" --><!--#set
var="ENGLISH_PAGE" value="/licenses/gpl-faq.en.html" -->
<!--#include virtual="/server/header.it.html" -->
<!-- Parent-Version: 1.84 -->
@@ -47,6 +52,7 @@
<!--#include virtual="/licenses/po/gpl-faq.translist" -->
<!--#include virtual="/server/banner.it.html" -->
+<!--#include virtual="/server/outdated.it.html" -->
<h2>Domande ricorrenti sulle licenze GNU</h2>
<!--#include virtual="/licenses/fsf-licensing.it.html" -->
@@ -3886,7 +3892,7 @@
<p class="unprintable"><!-- timestamp start -->
Ultimo aggiornamento:
-$Date: 2018/01/20 19:31:07 $
+$Date: 2018/05/07 21:58:59 $
<!-- timestamp end -->
</p>
Index: po/gpl-faq.it-diff.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/licenses/po/gpl-faq.it-diff.html,v
retrieving revision 1.3
retrieving revision 1.4
diff -u -b -r1.3 -r1.4
--- po/gpl-faq.it-diff.html 28 Dec 2017 23:59:56 -0000 1.3
+++ po/gpl-faq.it-diff.html 7 May 2018 21:59:00 -0000 1.4
@@ -11,7 +11,7 @@
</style></head>
<body><pre>
<!--#include virtual="/server/header.html" -->
-<!-- Parent-Version: 1.79 -->
+<!-- Parent-Version: 1.84 -->
<title>Frequently Asked Questions about the GNU Licenses
- GNU Project - Free Software Foundation</title>
<style type="text/css" media="screen">
@@ -193,7 +193,11 @@
“aggregate” and other kinds of “modified
versions”?</a></li>
- <li><a href="#AssignCopyright">Why does the FSF require that
+ <li><a <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>href="#AggregateContainers">When it comes to
determining
+ whether two pieces of software form a single work, does the fact
+ that the code is in one or more containers have any
effect?</a></li>
+
+ <li><a</em></ins></span> href="#AssignCopyright">Why does the
FSF require that
contributors to FSF-copyrighted programs assign copyright to the
FSF? If I hold copyright on a GPL'ed program, should I do this,
too? If so, how?</a></li>
@@ -426,7 +430,12 @@
version of a GPL'ed program on a web site. Does the GPL say they
must release their modified sources?</a></li>
- <li><a href="#InternalDistribution">Is use within one
organization
+ <li><a <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>href="#UnreleasedModsAGPL">A company is running a
modified
+ version of a program licensed under the GNU Affero GPL (AGPL) on a
+ web site. Does the AGPL say they must release their modified
+ sources?</a></li>
+
+ <li><a</em></ins></span> href="#InternalDistribution">Is use
within one organization
or company “distribution”?</a></li>
<li><a href="#StolenCopy">If someone steals a CD containing a
@@ -1997,8 +2006,16 @@
could be a basis to consider the two parts as combined into a larger
program.</p></dd>
+<dt <span class="inserted"><ins><em>id="AggregateContainers">When it
comes to determining
+ whether two pieces of software form a single work, does the fact
+ that the code is in one or more containers have any effect?
+ <span class="anchor-reference-id">(<a href="#AggregateContainers"
+ >#AggregateContainers</a>)</span></dt>
+<dd><p>No, the analysis of whether they are a <a
+href="#MereAggregation">single work or an
+aggregate</a> is unchanged by the involvement of
containers.</p></dd>
-<dt id="AssignCopyright">Why does
+<dt</em></ins></span> id="AssignCopyright">Why does
the FSF require that contributors to FSF-copyrighted programs assign
copyright to the FSF? If I hold copyright on a GPL'ed program, should
I do this, too? If so, how?
@@ -2402,19 +2419,39 @@
>#UnreleasedMods</a>)</span></dt>
<dd><p>
The GPL permits anyone to make a modified version and use it without
-ever distributing it to others. What this company is doing is a
-special case of that. Therefore, the company does not have to release
-the modified sources.</p>
+ever distributing it to others. What this company is doing is a special
+case of that. Therefore, the company does not have to release the
+modified <span class="removed"><del><strong>sources.</p>
+
+<p>It</strong></del></span> <span class="inserted"><ins><em>sources. The
situation</em></ins></span> is <span class="removed"><del><strong>essential for
people</strong></del></span> <span class="inserted"><ins><em>different when the
modified program
+is licensed under the terms of the <a
+href="#UnreleasedModsAGPL">GNU Affero GPL</a>.</p>
-<p>It is essential for people to have the freedom to make modifications
and
+<p>Compare this</em></ins></span> to <span
class="removed"><del><strong>have</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>a situation where</em></ins></span> the <span
class="removed"><del><strong>freedom</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>web site contains or links</em></ins></span> to <span
class="removed"><del><strong>make modifications and
use them privately, without ever publishing those modifications. However,
-putting the program on a server machine for the public to talk to is hardly
-“private” use, so it would be legitimate to require release of
-the source code in that special case. Developers who wish to address this
+putting</strong></del></span>
+<span class="inserted"><ins><em>separate GPL'ed programs that are distributed
to the user when they
+visit the web site (often written in <a
+href="/philosophy/javascript-trap.html">JavaScript</a>, but other
+languages are used as well). In this situation the source code for the
+programs being distributed must be released to the user
under</em></ins></span> the
+<span class="inserted"><ins><em>terms of the GPL.</p></dd>
+
+<dt id="UnreleasedModsAGPL">A company is running a modified
+ version of a</em></ins></span> program <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>licensed under the GNU Affero GPL
(AGPL)</em></ins></span> on a <span class="removed"><del><strong>server machine
for</strong></del></span>
+ <span class="inserted"><ins><em>web site. Does</em></ins></span> the <span
class="removed"><del><strong>public to talk</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>AGPL say they must release their modified
+ sources?
+ <span class="anchor-reference-id">(<a href="#UnreleasedModsAGPL"
+ >#UnreleasedModsAGPL</a>)</span></dt>
+<dd><p>The <a href="/licenses/agpl.html">GNU Affero
GPL</a>
+requires that modified versions of the software offer all users
+interacting with it over a computer network an opportunity</em></ins></span>
to <span class="inserted"><ins><em>receive
+the source. What the company</em></ins></span> is <span
class="removed"><del><strong>hardly
+“private” use,</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>doing falls under that meaning,</em></ins></span> so
<span class="removed"><del><strong>it would be legitimate to
require</strong></del></span> <span class="inserted"><ins><em>the
+company must</em></ins></span> release <span
class="removed"><del><strong>of</strong></del></span> the <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>modified</em></ins></span> source <span
class="removed"><del><strong>code in that special case. Developers who wish to
address this
might want to use the
<a href="/licenses/agpl.html">GNU Affero GPL</a> for
programs
-designed for network server use.</p></dd>
-
+designed for network server use.</p></dd></strong></del></span>
<span class="inserted"><ins><em>code.</p></dd></em></ins></span>
<dt id="InternalDistribution">Is making and using multiple copies
within one organization or company “distribution”?
@@ -3352,13 +3389,13 @@
No, because those two goals contradict each other. The GNU GPL is
designed specifically to prevent the addition of further restrictions.
GPLv3 allows a very limited set of them, in section 7, but any other
-added restriction can be removed by the <span
class="removed"><del><strong>user.</p></dd></strong></del></span>
<span class="inserted"><ins><em>user.</p>
+added restriction can be removed by the user.</p>
<p>More generally, a license that limits who can use a program, or for
what,
is <a href="/philosophy/programs-must-not-limit-freedom-to-run.html">not
a free software license</a>.</p>
-</dd></em></ins></span>
+</dd>
<dt id="ConveyVsDistribute">Is “convey” in GPLv3 the same
@@ -3906,7 +3943,7 @@
Information document, www.gnu.org/prep/maintain. -->
-<p>Copyright © 2014, 2015, 2016, 2017 Free Software Foundation,
Inc.</p>
+<p>Copyright © 2014, 2015, 2016, 2017, 2018 Free Software
Foundation, Inc.</p>
<p>This page is licensed under a <a rel="license"
href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/">Creative
@@ -3916,7 +3953,7 @@
<p class="unprintable">Updated:
<!-- timestamp start -->
-$Date: 2017/12/28 23:59:56 $
+$Date: 2018/05/07 21:59:00 $
<!-- timestamp end -->
</p>
</div>
| [Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread] |
- www/licenses gpl-faq.it.html po/gpl-faq.it-diff...,
GNUN <=