[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
www/philosophy why-copyleft.ar.html why-copylef...
|
From: |
GNUN |
|
Subject: |
www/philosophy why-copyleft.ar.html why-copylef... |
|
Date: |
Fri, 9 Feb 2018 05:03:52 -0500 (EST) |
CVSROOT: /web/www
Module name: www
Changes by: GNUN <gnun> 18/02/09 05:03:52
Modified files:
philosophy : why-copyleft.ar.html why-copyleft.bg.html
why-copyleft.ca.html why-copyleft.fa.html
why-copyleft.hr.html why-copyleft.it.html
why-copyleft.ko.html why-copyleft.ml.html
why-copyleft.nl.html why-copyleft.pl.html
why-copyleft.pt-br.html why-copyleft.tr.html
philosophy/po : why-copyleft.fa-diff.html
why-copyleft.hr-diff.html
why-copyleft.ko-diff.html
why-copyleft.nl-diff.html
Added files:
philosophy/po : why-copyleft.ar-diff.html
why-copyleft.bg-diff.html
why-copyleft.ca-diff.html
why-copyleft.it-diff.html
why-copyleft.ml-diff.html
why-copyleft.pl-diff.html
why-copyleft.pt-br-diff.html
why-copyleft.tr-diff.html
Log message:
Automatic update by GNUnited Nations.
CVSWeb URLs:
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/why-copyleft.ar.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.21&r2=1.22
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/why-copyleft.bg.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.18&r2=1.19
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/why-copyleft.ca.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.36&r2=1.37
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/why-copyleft.fa.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.17&r2=1.18
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/why-copyleft.hr.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.8&r2=1.9
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/why-copyleft.it.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.24&r2=1.25
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/why-copyleft.ko.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.26&r2=1.27
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/why-copyleft.ml.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.19&r2=1.20
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/why-copyleft.nl.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.14&r2=1.15
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/why-copyleft.pl.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.37&r2=1.38
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/why-copyleft.pt-br.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.1&r2=1.2
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/why-copyleft.tr.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.17&r2=1.18
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/po/why-copyleft.fa-diff.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.1&r2=1.2
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/po/why-copyleft.hr-diff.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.4&r2=1.5
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/po/why-copyleft.ko-diff.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.3&r2=1.4
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/po/why-copyleft.nl-diff.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.3&r2=1.4
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/po/why-copyleft.ar-diff.html?cvsroot=www&rev=1.1
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/po/why-copyleft.bg-diff.html?cvsroot=www&rev=1.1
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/po/why-copyleft.ca-diff.html?cvsroot=www&rev=1.1
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/po/why-copyleft.it-diff.html?cvsroot=www&rev=1.1
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/po/why-copyleft.ml-diff.html?cvsroot=www&rev=1.1
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/po/why-copyleft.pl-diff.html?cvsroot=www&rev=1.1
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/po/why-copyleft.pt-br-diff.html?cvsroot=www&rev=1.1
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/po/why-copyleft.tr-diff.html?cvsroot=www&rev=1.1
Patches:
Index: why-copyleft.ar.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/why-copyleft.ar.html,v
retrieving revision 1.21
retrieving revision 1.22
diff -u -b -r1.21 -r1.22
--- why-copyleft.ar.html 8 Nov 2014 22:00:12 -0000 1.21
+++ why-copyleft.ar.html 9 Feb 2018 10:03:49 -0000 1.22
@@ -1,4 +1,9 @@
-<!--#set var="ENGLISH_PAGE" value="/philosophy/why-copyleft.en.html" -->
+<!--#set var="PO_FILE"
+ value='<a href="/philosophy/po/why-copyleft.ar.po">
+ https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/po/why-copyleft.ar.po</a>'
+ --><!--#set var="ORIGINAL_FILE" value="/philosophy/why-copyleft.html"
+ --><!--#set var="DIFF_FILE" value="/philosophy/po/why-copyleft.ar-diff.html"
+ --><!--#set var="OUTDATED_SINCE" value="2017-12-11" --><!--#set
var="ENGLISH_PAGE" value="/philosophy/why-copyleft.en.html" -->
<!--#include virtual="/server/header.ar.html" -->
<!-- Parent-Version: 1.77 -->
@@ -8,6 +13,7 @@
<!--#include virtual="/philosophy/po/why-copyleft.translist" -->
<!--#include virtual="/server/banner.ar.html" -->
+<!--#include virtual="/server/outdated.ar.html" -->
<h2>ÙÙ
اذا اÙØÙÙ٠اÙÙ
ترÙÙØ©Ø</h2>
<p>
@@ -119,7 +125,7 @@
<p class="unprintable"><!-- timestamp start -->
ØÙدثÙت:
-$Date: 2014/11/08 22:00:12 $
+$Date: 2018/02/09 10:03:49 $
<!-- timestamp end -->
</p>
Index: why-copyleft.bg.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/why-copyleft.bg.html,v
retrieving revision 1.18
retrieving revision 1.19
diff -u -b -r1.18 -r1.19
--- why-copyleft.bg.html 29 Dec 2014 09:29:46 -0000 1.18
+++ why-copyleft.bg.html 9 Feb 2018 10:03:49 -0000 1.19
@@ -1,4 +1,9 @@
-<!--#set var="ENGLISH_PAGE" value="/philosophy/why-copyleft.en.html" -->
+<!--#set var="PO_FILE"
+ value='<a href="/philosophy/po/why-copyleft.bg.po">
+ https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/po/why-copyleft.bg.po</a>'
+ --><!--#set var="ORIGINAL_FILE" value="/philosophy/why-copyleft.html"
+ --><!--#set var="DIFF_FILE" value="/philosophy/po/why-copyleft.bg-diff.html"
+ --><!--#set var="OUTDATED_SINCE" value="2017-12-11" --><!--#set
var="ENGLISH_PAGE" value="/philosophy/why-copyleft.en.html" -->
<!--#include virtual="/server/header.bg.html" -->
<!-- Parent-Version: 1.77 -->
@@ -8,6 +13,7 @@
<!--#include virtual="/philosophy/po/why-copyleft.translist" -->
<!--#include virtual="/server/banner.bg.html" -->
+<!--#include virtual="/server/outdated.bg.html" -->
<h2>ÐаÑо âcopyleftâ?</h2>
<p>
@@ -124,7 +130,7 @@
<p class="unprintable"><!-- timestamp start -->
ÐоÑледно обновÑване:
-$Date: 2014/12/29 09:29:46 $
+$Date: 2018/02/09 10:03:49 $
<!-- timestamp end -->
</p>
Index: why-copyleft.ca.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/why-copyleft.ca.html,v
retrieving revision 1.36
retrieving revision 1.37
diff -u -b -r1.36 -r1.37
--- why-copyleft.ca.html 11 Jul 2016 08:08:18 -0000 1.36
+++ why-copyleft.ca.html 9 Feb 2018 10:03:49 -0000 1.37
@@ -1,4 +1,9 @@
-<!--#set var="ENGLISH_PAGE" value="/philosophy/why-copyleft.en.html" -->
+<!--#set var="PO_FILE"
+ value='<a href="/philosophy/po/why-copyleft.ca.po">
+ https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/po/why-copyleft.ca.po</a>'
+ --><!--#set var="ORIGINAL_FILE" value="/philosophy/why-copyleft.html"
+ --><!--#set var="DIFF_FILE" value="/philosophy/po/why-copyleft.ca-diff.html"
+ --><!--#set var="OUTDATED_SINCE" value="2017-12-11" --><!--#set
var="ENGLISH_PAGE" value="/philosophy/why-copyleft.en.html" -->
<!--#include virtual="/server/header.ca.html" -->
<!-- Parent-Version: 1.77 -->
@@ -8,6 +13,7 @@
<!--#include virtual="/philosophy/po/why-copyleft.translist" -->
<!--#include virtual="/server/banner.ca.html" -->
+<!--#include virtual="/server/outdated.ca.html" -->
<h2>Per què Copyleft?</h2>
<p>
@@ -127,7 +133,7 @@
<p class="unprintable"><!-- timestamp start -->
Updated:
-$Date: 2016/07/11 08:08:18 $
+$Date: 2018/02/09 10:03:49 $
<!-- timestamp end -->
</p>
Index: why-copyleft.fa.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/why-copyleft.fa.html,v
retrieving revision 1.17
retrieving revision 1.18
diff -u -b -r1.17 -r1.18
--- why-copyleft.fa.html 5 Mar 2015 09:27:12 -0000 1.17
+++ why-copyleft.fa.html 9 Feb 2018 10:03:49 -0000 1.18
@@ -1,4 +1,9 @@
-<!--#set var="ENGLISH_PAGE" value="/philosophy/why-copyleft.en.html" -->
+<!--#set var="PO_FILE"
+ value='<a href="/philosophy/po/why-copyleft.fa.po">
+ https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/po/why-copyleft.fa.po</a>'
+ --><!--#set var="ORIGINAL_FILE" value="/philosophy/why-copyleft.html"
+ --><!--#set var="DIFF_FILE" value="/philosophy/po/why-copyleft.fa-diff.html"
+ --><!--#set var="OUTDATED_SINCE" value="2017-12-11" --><!--#set
var="ENGLISH_PAGE" value="/philosophy/why-copyleft.en.html" -->
<!--#include virtual="/server/header.fa.html" -->
<!-- Parent-Version: 1.77 -->
@@ -8,6 +13,7 @@
<!--#include virtual="/philosophy/po/why-copyleft.translist" -->
<!--#include virtual="/server/banner.fa.html" -->
+<!--#include virtual="/server/outdated.fa.html" -->
<h2>Úرا Ú©Ù¾ÛâÙÙتØ</h2>
<p>
@@ -122,7 +128,7 @@
<p class="unprintable"><!-- timestamp start -->
آخرÛ٠ب٠رÙز رساÙÛ:
-$Date: 2015/03/05 09:27:12 $
+$Date: 2018/02/09 10:03:49 $
<!-- timestamp end -->
</p>
Index: why-copyleft.hr.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/why-copyleft.hr.html,v
retrieving revision 1.8
retrieving revision 1.9
diff -u -b -r1.8 -r1.9
--- why-copyleft.hr.html 14 Apr 2017 15:01:10 -0000 1.8
+++ why-copyleft.hr.html 9 Feb 2018 10:03:49 -0000 1.9
@@ -1,4 +1,9 @@
-<!--#set var="ENGLISH_PAGE" value="/philosophy/why-copyleft.en.html" -->
+<!--#set var="PO_FILE"
+ value='<a href="/philosophy/po/why-copyleft.hr.po">
+ https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/po/why-copyleft.hr.po</a>'
+ --><!--#set var="ORIGINAL_FILE" value="/philosophy/why-copyleft.html"
+ --><!--#set var="DIFF_FILE" value="/philosophy/po/why-copyleft.hr-diff.html"
+ --><!--#set var="OUTDATED_SINCE" value="2017-12-11" --><!--#set
var="ENGLISH_PAGE" value="/philosophy/why-copyleft.en.html" -->
<!--#include virtual="/server/header.hr.html" -->
<!-- Parent-Version: 1.77 -->
@@ -8,6 +13,7 @@
<!--#include virtual="/philosophy/po/why-copyleft.translist" -->
<!--#include virtual="/server/banner.hr.html" -->
+<!--#include virtual="/server/outdated.hr.html" -->
<h2>Zašto Copyleft</h2>
<p>
@@ -124,7 +130,7 @@
<p class="unprintable"><!-- timestamp start -->
Vrijeme zadnje izmjene:
-$Date: 2017/04/14 15:01:10 $
+$Date: 2018/02/09 10:03:49 $
<!-- timestamp end -->
</p>
Index: why-copyleft.it.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/why-copyleft.it.html,v
retrieving revision 1.24
retrieving revision 1.25
diff -u -b -r1.24 -r1.25
--- why-copyleft.it.html 23 May 2015 06:11:09 -0000 1.24
+++ why-copyleft.it.html 9 Feb 2018 10:03:49 -0000 1.25
@@ -1,4 +1,9 @@
-<!--#set var="ENGLISH_PAGE" value="/philosophy/why-copyleft.en.html" -->
+<!--#set var="PO_FILE"
+ value='<a href="/philosophy/po/why-copyleft.it.po">
+ https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/po/why-copyleft.it.po</a>'
+ --><!--#set var="ORIGINAL_FILE" value="/philosophy/why-copyleft.html"
+ --><!--#set var="DIFF_FILE" value="/philosophy/po/why-copyleft.it-diff.html"
+ --><!--#set var="OUTDATED_SINCE" value="2017-12-11" --><!--#set
var="ENGLISH_PAGE" value="/philosophy/why-copyleft.en.html" -->
<!--#include virtual="/server/header.it.html" -->
<!-- Parent-Version: 1.77 -->
@@ -8,6 +13,7 @@
<!--#include virtual="/philosophy/po/why-copyleft.translist" -->
<!--#include virtual="/server/banner.it.html" -->
+<!--#include virtual="/server/outdated.it.html" -->
<h2>Perché Copyleft?</h2>
<p>
@@ -130,7 +136,7 @@
<p class="unprintable"><!-- timestamp start -->
Ultimo aggiornamento:
-$Date: 2015/05/23 06:11:09 $
+$Date: 2018/02/09 10:03:49 $
<!-- timestamp end -->
</p>
Index: why-copyleft.ko.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/why-copyleft.ko.html,v
retrieving revision 1.26
retrieving revision 1.27
diff -u -b -r1.26 -r1.27
--- why-copyleft.ko.html 12 Jul 2014 12:59:14 -0000 1.26
+++ why-copyleft.ko.html 9 Feb 2018 10:03:49 -0000 1.27
@@ -1,4 +1,9 @@
-<!--#set var="ENGLISH_PAGE" value="/philosophy/why-copyleft.en.html" -->
+<!--#set var="PO_FILE"
+ value='<a href="/philosophy/po/why-copyleft.ko.po">
+ https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/po/why-copyleft.ko.po</a>'
+ --><!--#set var="ORIGINAL_FILE" value="/philosophy/why-copyleft.html"
+ --><!--#set var="DIFF_FILE" value="/philosophy/po/why-copyleft.ko-diff.html"
+ --><!--#set var="OUTDATED_SINCE" value="2017-12-11" --><!--#set
var="ENGLISH_PAGE" value="/philosophy/why-copyleft.en.html" -->
<!--#include virtual="/server/header.ko.html" -->
<!-- Parent-Version: 1.77 -->
@@ -8,6 +13,7 @@
<!--#include virtual="/philosophy/po/why-copyleft.translist" -->
<!--#include virtual="/server/banner.ko.html" -->
+<!--#include virtual="/server/outdated.ko.html" -->
<h2>ì ì¹´í¼ë íí¸ì¸ê°?</h2>
<p>
@@ -110,7 +116,7 @@
<p class="unprintable"><!-- timestamp start -->
ìµì¢
ìì ì¼:
-$Date: 2014/07/12 12:59:14 $
+$Date: 2018/02/09 10:03:49 $
<!-- timestamp end -->
</p>
Index: why-copyleft.ml.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/why-copyleft.ml.html,v
retrieving revision 1.19
retrieving revision 1.20
diff -u -b -r1.19 -r1.20
--- why-copyleft.ml.html 11 Apr 2017 17:29:54 -0000 1.19
+++ why-copyleft.ml.html 9 Feb 2018 10:03:49 -0000 1.20
@@ -1,4 +1,9 @@
-<!--#set var="ENGLISH_PAGE" value="/philosophy/why-copyleft.en.html" -->
+<!--#set var="PO_FILE"
+ value='<a href="/philosophy/po/why-copyleft.ml.po">
+ https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/po/why-copyleft.ml.po</a>'
+ --><!--#set var="ORIGINAL_FILE" value="/philosophy/why-copyleft.html"
+ --><!--#set var="DIFF_FILE" value="/philosophy/po/why-copyleft.ml-diff.html"
+ --><!--#set var="OUTDATED_SINCE" value="2017-12-11" --><!--#set
var="ENGLISH_PAGE" value="/philosophy/why-copyleft.en.html" -->
<!--#include virtual="/server/header.ml.html" -->
<!-- Parent-Version: 1.77 -->
@@ -9,6 +14,7 @@
<!--#include virtual="/philosophy/po/why-copyleft.translist" -->
<!--#include virtual="/server/banner.ml.html" -->
+<!--#include virtual="/server/outdated.ml.html" -->
<h2>à´à´¨àµà´¤àµàµ à´àµà´¾à´£àµà´àµàµ
à´ªà´à´°àµâà´ªàµà´ªà´¨àµà´®à´¤à´¿?</h2>
<p>
@@ -134,7 +140,7 @@
<p class="unprintable"><!-- timestamp start -->
à´ªàµà´¤àµà´àµà´à´¿à´¯à´¤àµàµ:
-$Date: 2017/04/11 17:29:54 $
+$Date: 2018/02/09 10:03:49 $
<!-- timestamp end -->
</p>
Index: why-copyleft.nl.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/why-copyleft.nl.html,v
retrieving revision 1.14
retrieving revision 1.15
diff -u -b -r1.14 -r1.15
--- why-copyleft.nl.html 9 Feb 2015 21:03:03 -0000 1.14
+++ why-copyleft.nl.html 9 Feb 2018 10:03:49 -0000 1.15
@@ -1,4 +1,9 @@
-<!--#set var="ENGLISH_PAGE" value="/philosophy/why-copyleft.en.html" -->
+<!--#set var="PO_FILE"
+ value='<a href="/philosophy/po/why-copyleft.nl.po">
+ https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/po/why-copyleft.nl.po</a>'
+ --><!--#set var="ORIGINAL_FILE" value="/philosophy/why-copyleft.html"
+ --><!--#set var="DIFF_FILE" value="/philosophy/po/why-copyleft.nl-diff.html"
+ --><!--#set var="OUTDATED_SINCE" value="2017-12-11" --><!--#set
var="ENGLISH_PAGE" value="/philosophy/why-copyleft.en.html" -->
<!--#include virtual="/server/header.nl.html" -->
<!-- Parent-Version: 1.77 -->
@@ -8,6 +13,7 @@
<!--#include virtual="/philosophy/po/why-copyleft.translist" -->
<!--#include virtual="/server/banner.nl.html" -->
+<!--#include virtual="/server/outdated.nl.html" -->
<h2>Waarom Copyleft?</h2>
<p>
@@ -123,7 +129,7 @@
<p class="unprintable"><!-- timestamp start -->
Bijgewerkt:
-$Date: 2015/02/09 21:03:03 $
+$Date: 2018/02/09 10:03:49 $
<!-- timestamp end -->
</p>
Index: why-copyleft.pl.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/why-copyleft.pl.html,v
retrieving revision 1.37
retrieving revision 1.38
diff -u -b -r1.37 -r1.38
--- why-copyleft.pl.html 16 Jan 2016 00:05:03 -0000 1.37
+++ why-copyleft.pl.html 9 Feb 2018 10:03:49 -0000 1.38
@@ -1,4 +1,9 @@
-<!--#set var="ENGLISH_PAGE" value="/philosophy/why-copyleft.en.html" -->
+<!--#set var="PO_FILE"
+ value='<a href="/philosophy/po/why-copyleft.pl.po">
+ https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/po/why-copyleft.pl.po</a>'
+ --><!--#set var="ORIGINAL_FILE" value="/philosophy/why-copyleft.html"
+ --><!--#set var="DIFF_FILE" value="/philosophy/po/why-copyleft.pl-diff.html"
+ --><!--#set var="OUTDATED_SINCE" value="2017-12-11" --><!--#set
var="ENGLISH_PAGE" value="/philosophy/why-copyleft.en.html" -->
<!--#include virtual="/server/header.pl.html" -->
<!-- Parent-Version: 1.77 -->
@@ -8,6 +13,7 @@
<!--#include virtual="/philosophy/po/why-copyleft.translist" -->
<!--#include virtual="/server/banner.pl.html" -->
+<!--#include virtual="/server/outdated.pl.html" -->
<h2>Dlaczego copyleft?</h2>
<p>
@@ -131,7 +137,7 @@
<p class="unprintable"><!-- timestamp start -->
Aktualizowane:
-$Date: 2016/01/16 00:05:03 $
+$Date: 2018/02/09 10:03:49 $
<!-- timestamp end -->
</p>
Index: why-copyleft.pt-br.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/why-copyleft.pt-br.html,v
retrieving revision 1.1
retrieving revision 1.2
diff -u -b -r1.1 -r1.2
--- why-copyleft.pt-br.html 20 Jul 2017 08:01:12 -0000 1.1
+++ why-copyleft.pt-br.html 9 Feb 2018 10:03:49 -0000 1.2
@@ -1,4 +1,9 @@
-<!--#set var="ENGLISH_PAGE" value="/philosophy/why-copyleft.en.html" -->
+<!--#set var="PO_FILE"
+ value='<a href="/philosophy/po/why-copyleft.pt-br.po">
+ https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/po/why-copyleft.pt-br.po</a>'
+ --><!--#set var="ORIGINAL_FILE" value="/philosophy/why-copyleft.html"
+ --><!--#set var="DIFF_FILE"
value="/philosophy/po/why-copyleft.pt-br-diff.html"
+ --><!--#set var="OUTDATED_SINCE" value="2017-12-11" --><!--#set
var="ENGLISH_PAGE" value="/philosophy/why-copyleft.en.html" -->
<!--#include virtual="/server/header.pt-br.html" -->
<!-- Parent-Version: 1.77 -->
@@ -8,6 +13,7 @@
<!--#include virtual="/philosophy/po/why-copyleft.translist" -->
<!--#include virtual="/server/banner.pt-br.html" -->
+<!--#include virtual="/server/outdated.pt-br.html" -->
<h2>Por que Copyleft?</h2>
<p>
@@ -125,7 +131,7 @@
<p class="unprintable"><!-- timestamp start -->
Ãltima atualização:
-$Date: 2017/07/20 08:01:12 $
+$Date: 2018/02/09 10:03:49 $
<!-- timestamp end -->
</p>
Index: why-copyleft.tr.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/why-copyleft.tr.html,v
retrieving revision 1.17
retrieving revision 1.18
diff -u -b -r1.17 -r1.18
--- why-copyleft.tr.html 12 Jul 2014 12:59:14 -0000 1.17
+++ why-copyleft.tr.html 9 Feb 2018 10:03:49 -0000 1.18
@@ -1,4 +1,9 @@
-<!--#set var="ENGLISH_PAGE" value="/philosophy/why-copyleft.en.html" -->
+<!--#set var="PO_FILE"
+ value='<a href="/philosophy/po/why-copyleft.tr.po">
+ https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/po/why-copyleft.tr.po</a>'
+ --><!--#set var="ORIGINAL_FILE" value="/philosophy/why-copyleft.html"
+ --><!--#set var="DIFF_FILE" value="/philosophy/po/why-copyleft.tr-diff.html"
+ --><!--#set var="OUTDATED_SINCE" value="2017-12-11" --><!--#set
var="ENGLISH_PAGE" value="/philosophy/why-copyleft.en.html" -->
<!--#include virtual="/server/header.tr.html" -->
<!-- Parent-Version: 1.77 -->
@@ -8,6 +13,7 @@
<!--#include virtual="/philosophy/po/why-copyleft.translist" -->
<!--#include virtual="/server/banner.tr.html" -->
+<!--#include virtual="/server/outdated.tr.html" -->
<h2>Neden Copyleft?</h2>
<p>
@@ -153,7 +159,7 @@
<p class="unprintable"><!-- timestamp start -->
Son Güncelleme:
-$Date: 2014/07/12 12:59:14 $
+$Date: 2018/02/09 10:03:49 $
<!-- timestamp end -->
</p>
Index: po/why-copyleft.fa-diff.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/po/why-copyleft.fa-diff.html,v
retrieving revision 1.1
retrieving revision 1.2
diff -u -b -r1.1 -r1.2
--- po/why-copyleft.fa-diff.html 28 Oct 2014 21:57:00 -0000 1.1
+++ po/why-copyleft.fa-diff.html 9 Feb 2018 10:03:51 -0000 1.2
@@ -11,7 +11,7 @@
</style></head>
<body><pre>
<!--#include virtual="/server/header.html" -->
-<!-- Parent-Version: 1.77 -->
+<!-- Parent-Version: <span
class="removed"><del><strong>1.77</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>1.84</em></ins></span> -->
<title>Why Copyleft?
- GNU Project - Free Software Foundation</title>
<!--#include virtual="/philosophy/po/why-copyleft.translist" -->
@@ -43,22 +43,44 @@
</p>
<p>
-Humility is abnegating your own self interest, but you and the one who
-uses your code are not the only ones affected by your choice of which
-free software license to use for your code. Someone who uses your
-code in a nonfree program is trying to deny freedom to others, and if
-you let him do it, you're failing to defend their freedom. When it
-comes to defending the freedom of others, to lie down and do nothing
-is an act of weakness, not humility.
+Humility is <span
class="removed"><del><strong>abnegating</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>disregarding</em></ins></span> your own <span
class="removed"><del><strong>self interest,</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>self-interest,</em></ins></span> but <span
class="removed"><del><strong>you and</strong></del></span> the <span
class="removed"><del><strong>one who
+uses</strong></del></span> <span class="inserted"><ins><em>interest you
+abandon when you don't copyleft</em></ins></span> your code <span
class="removed"><del><strong>are not the only ones affected by your choice of
which
+free software license to use for</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>is much bigger than</em></ins></span> your <span
class="removed"><del><strong>code.</strong></del></span>
+<span class="inserted"><ins><em>own.</em></ins></span> Someone who uses your
code in a nonfree program is <span class="removed"><del><strong>trying to
deny</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>denying</em></ins></span>
+freedom to others, <span
class="removed"><del><strong>and</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>so</em></ins></span> if you <span
class="removed"><del><strong>let him do it,</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>allow that,</em></ins></span> you're failing to
defend <span class="removed"><del><strong>their</strong></del></span>
+<span class="inserted"><ins><em>those people's</em></ins></span> freedom.
When it comes to defending <span class="removed"><del><strong>the freedom of
others,</strong></del></span> <span class="inserted"><ins><em>everyone's
+freedom,</em></ins></span> to lie down and do nothing is an act of weakness,
not
+humility.
</p>
<p>
-Releasing your code under one of the BSD licenses, or some other
-permissive non-copyleft license, is not doing wrong; the program is
-still free software, and still a contribution to our community. But
-it is weak, and in most cases it is not the best way to promote users'
-freedom to share and change software.
-</p>
+Releasing your code under <span class="inserted"><ins><em><a
href="/licenses/bsd.html"></em></ins></span> one of the BSD <span
class="removed"><del><strong>licenses,</strong></del></span>
+<span class="inserted"><ins><em>licenses</a>,</em></ins></span> or some
other <span class="inserted"><ins><em>lax,</em></ins></span> permissive <span
class="removed"><del><strong>non-copyleft</strong></del></span> license, is not
doing
+wrong; the program is still free software, and still a contribution to
+our community. But it is weak, and in most cases it is not the best
+way to promote users' freedom to share and change software.
+</p>
+
+<span class="inserted"><ins><em><p>
+Here are specific examples of nonfree versions of free programs
+that have done major harm to the free world.</p>
+
+<ul>
+<li>Those who released LLVM under a non-copyleft
+license <a
href="https://www.anandtech.com/show/5238/nvidia-releases-cuda-41-cuda-goes-llvm-and-open-source-kind-of">enabled
+nVidia to release a high-quality nonfree compiler</a> for its GPUs,
+while keeping its instruction set secret. Thus, we can't write a free
+compiler for that platform without a big reverse engineering job. The
+nonfree adaptation of LLVM is the only compiler for those machines,
+and is likely to remain so.</li>
+
+<li>Intel uses
+<a
href="http://www.tomshardware.com/news/google-removing-minix-management-engine-intel,35876.html">a
+proprietary version of the MINIX system</a>, which is free but not
+copylefted, in the Management Engine back door in its modern
+processors.</li>
+</ul></em></ins></span>
</div><!-- for id="content", starts in the include above -->
<!--#include virtual="/server/footer.html" -->
@@ -92,7 +114,7 @@
<!-- Regarding copyright, in general, standalone pages (as opposed to
files generated as part of manuals) on the GNU web server should
- be under CC BY-ND 3.0 US. Please do NOT change or remove this
+ be under CC BY-ND <span class="removed"><del><strong>3.0
US.</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>4.0.</em></ins></span> Please do NOT change or
remove this
without talking with the webmasters or licensing team first.
Please make sure the copyright date is consistent with the
document. For web pages, it is ok to list just the latest year the
@@ -107,17 +129,18 @@
There is more detail about copyright years in the GNU Maintainers
Information document, www.gnu.org/prep/maintain. -->
-<p>Copyright © 2003, 2007, 2008, 2013 Free Software Foundation,
Inc.</p>
+<p>Copyright © 2003, 2007, 2008, <span
class="removed"><del><strong>2013</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>2013, 2017, 2018</em></ins></span> Free Software
Foundation, Inc.</p>
<p>This page is licensed under a <a rel="license"
-href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/3.0/us/">Creative
-Commons Attribution-NoDerivs 3.0 United States License</a>.</p>
+<span
class="removed"><del><strong>href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/3.0/us/">Creative</strong></del></span>
+<span
class="inserted"><ins><em>href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/">Creative</em></ins></span>
+Commons <span class="removed"><del><strong>Attribution-NoDerivs 3.0 United
States</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0
International</em></ins></span> License</a>.</p>
<!--#include virtual="/server/bottom-notes.html" -->
<p class="unprintable">Updated:
<!-- timestamp start -->
-$Date: 2014/10/28 21:57:00 $
+$Date: 2018/02/09 10:03:51 $
<!-- timestamp end -->
</p>
</div>
Index: po/why-copyleft.hr-diff.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/po/why-copyleft.hr-diff.html,v
retrieving revision 1.4
retrieving revision 1.5
diff -u -b -r1.4 -r1.5
--- po/why-copyleft.hr-diff.html 23 May 2015 06:11:15 -0000 1.4
+++ po/why-copyleft.hr-diff.html 9 Feb 2018 10:03:51 -0000 1.5
@@ -11,21 +11,13 @@
</style></head>
<body><pre>
<!--#include virtual="/server/header.html" -->
-<span class="inserted"><ins><em><!-- Parent-Version: 1.77
--></em></ins></span>
+<!-- Parent-Version: <span
class="removed"><del><strong>1.77</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>1.84</em></ins></span> -->
<title>Why Copyleft?
-- GNU Project - Free Software <span class="removed"><del><strong>Foundation
(FSF)</title></strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>Foundation</title></em></ins></span>
+- GNU Project - Free Software Foundation</title>
<!--#include virtual="/philosophy/po/why-copyleft.translist" -->
<!--#include virtual="/server/banner.html" -->
<h2>Why Copyleft?</h2>
-<span class="removed"><del><strong><!-- This document uses XHTML 1.0
Strict, but may be served as -->
-<!-- text/html. Please ensure that markup style considers -->
-<!-- appendex C of the XHTML 1.0 standard. See validator.w3.org. -->
-
-<!-- Please ensure links are consistent with Apache's MultiView. -->
-<!-- Change include statements to be consistent with the relevant -->
-<!-- language, where necessary. --></strong></del></span>
-
<p>
<cite>“When it comes to defending the freedom of others, to lie
down and do nothing is an act of weakness, not humility.”</cite>
@@ -51,48 +43,55 @@
</p>
<p>
-Humility is abnegating your own self interest, but you and the one who
-uses your code are not the only ones affected by your choice of which
-free software license to use for your code. Someone who uses your
-code in a <span class="removed"><del><strong>non-free</strong></del></span>
<span class="inserted"><ins><em>nonfree</em></ins></span> program is trying to
deny freedom to others, and if
-you let him do it, you're failing to defend their freedom. When it
-comes to defending the freedom of others, to lie down and do nothing
-is an act of weakness, not humility.
+Humility is <span
class="removed"><del><strong>abnegating</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>disregarding</em></ins></span> your own <span
class="removed"><del><strong>self interest,</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>self-interest,</em></ins></span> but <span
class="removed"><del><strong>you and</strong></del></span> the <span
class="removed"><del><strong>one who
+uses</strong></del></span> <span class="inserted"><ins><em>interest you
+abandon when you don't copyleft</em></ins></span> your code <span
class="removed"><del><strong>are not the only ones affected by your choice of
which
+free software license to use for</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>is much bigger than</em></ins></span> your <span
class="removed"><del><strong>code.</strong></del></span>
+<span class="inserted"><ins><em>own.</em></ins></span> Someone who uses your
code in a nonfree program is <span class="removed"><del><strong>trying to
deny</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>denying</em></ins></span>
+freedom to others, <span
class="removed"><del><strong>and</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>so</em></ins></span> if you <span
class="removed"><del><strong>let him do it,</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>allow that,</em></ins></span> you're failing to
defend <span class="removed"><del><strong>their</strong></del></span>
+<span class="inserted"><ins><em>those people's</em></ins></span> freedom.
When it comes to defending <span class="removed"><del><strong>the freedom of
others,</strong></del></span> <span class="inserted"><ins><em>everyone's
+freedom,</em></ins></span> to lie down and do nothing is an act of weakness,
not
+humility.
</p>
<p>
-Releasing your code under one of the BSD licenses, or some other
-permissive non-copyleft license, is not doing wrong; the program is
-still free software, and still a contribution to our community. But
-it is weak, and in most cases it is not the best way to promote users'
-freedom to share and change software.
-</p>
-
-<span class="removed"><del><strong><!-- If needed, change the copyright
block at the bottom. In general, -->
-<!-- all pages on the GNU web server should have the section about -->
-<!-- verbatim copying. Please do NOT remove this without talking -->
-<!-- with the webmasters first. -->
-<!-- Please make sure the copyright date is consistent with the document
-->
-<!-- and that it is like this "2001, 2002" not this "2001-2002."
--></strong></del></span>
+Releasing your code under <span class="inserted"><ins><em><a
href="/licenses/bsd.html"></em></ins></span> one of the BSD <span
class="removed"><del><strong>licenses,</strong></del></span>
+<span class="inserted"><ins><em>licenses</a>,</em></ins></span> or some
other <span class="inserted"><ins><em>lax,</em></ins></span> permissive <span
class="removed"><del><strong>non-copyleft</strong></del></span> license, is not
doing
+wrong; the program is still free software, and still a contribution to
+our community. But it is weak, and in most cases it is not the best
+way to promote users' freedom to share and change software.
+</p>
+
+<span class="inserted"><ins><em><p>
+Here are specific examples of nonfree versions of free programs
+that have done major harm to the free world.</p>
+
+<ul>
+<li>Those who released LLVM under a non-copyleft
+license <a
href="https://www.anandtech.com/show/5238/nvidia-releases-cuda-41-cuda-goes-llvm-and-open-source-kind-of">enabled
+nVidia to release a high-quality nonfree compiler</a> for its GPUs,
+while keeping its instruction set secret. Thus, we can't write a free
+compiler for that platform without a big reverse engineering job. The
+nonfree adaptation of LLVM is the only compiler for those machines,
+and is likely to remain so.</li>
+
+<li>Intel uses
+<a
href="http://www.tomshardware.com/news/google-removing-minix-management-engine-intel,35876.html">a
+proprietary version of the MINIX system</a>, which is free but not
+copylefted, in the Management Engine back door in its modern
+processors.</li>
+</ul></em></ins></span>
</div><!-- for id="content", starts in the include above -->
<!--#include virtual="/server/footer.html" -->
<div id="footer">
+<div class="unprintable">
-<span class="removed"><del><strong><p>
-Please</strong></del></span>
-<span class="inserted"><ins><em><div class="unprintable">
-
-<p>Please</em></ins></span> send <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>general</em></ins></span> FSF & GNU inquiries to
+<p>Please send general FSF & GNU inquiries to
<a href="mailto:address@hidden"><address@hidden></a>.
There are also <a href="/contact/">other ways to contact</a>
-the FSF.
-<span class="removed"><del><strong><br />
-Please send broken</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>Broken</em></ins></span> links and other corrections
or suggestions <span class="inserted"><ins><em>can be sent</em></ins></span>
-to <a <span
class="removed"><del><strong>href="mailto:address@hidden"><address@hidden></a>.
-</p>
-
-<p></strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>href="mailto:address@hidden"><address@hidden></a>.</p>
+the FSF. Broken links and other corrections or suggestions can be sent
+to <a
href="mailto:address@hidden"><address@hidden></a>.</p>
<p><!-- TRANSLATORS: Ignore the original text in this paragraph,
replace it with the translation of these two:
@@ -106,20 +105,16 @@
<p>For information on coordinating and submitting translations of
our web pages, see <a
href="/server/standards/README.translations.html">Translations
- README</a>. --></em></ins></span>
+ README</a>. -->
Please see the <a
href="/server/standards/README.translations.html">Translations
README</a> for information on coordinating and submitting translations
-of this <span class="removed"><del><strong>article.
-</p>
-
-<p>
-Copyright</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>article.</p>
+of this article.</p>
</div>
<!-- Regarding copyright, in general, standalone pages (as opposed to
files generated as part of manuals) on the GNU web server should
- be under CC BY-ND 3.0 US. Please do NOT change or remove this
+ be under CC BY-ND <span class="removed"><del><strong>3.0
US.</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>4.0.</em></ins></span> Please do NOT change or
remove this
without talking with the webmasters or licensing team first.
Please make sure the copyright date is consistent with the
document. For web pages, it is ok to list just the latest year the
@@ -134,22 +129,18 @@
There is more detail about copyright years in the GNU Maintainers
Information document, www.gnu.org/prep/maintain. -->
-<p>Copyright</em></ins></span> © 2003, 2007, <span
class="removed"><del><strong>2008</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>2008, 2013</em></ins></span> Free Software
Foundation, <span class="removed"><del><strong>Inc.,
-</p>
-<address>51 Franklin St, Fifth Floor, Boston, MA 02110,
USA</address></strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>Inc.</p></em></ins></span>
+<p>Copyright © 2003, 2007, 2008, <span
class="removed"><del><strong>2013</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>2013, 2017, 2018</em></ins></span> Free Software
Foundation, Inc.</p>
<p>This page is licensed under a <a rel="license"
-href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/3.0/us/">Creative
-Commons Attribution-NoDerivs 3.0 United States <span
class="removed"><del><strong>License</a>.
-</p></strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>License</a>.</p></em></ins></span>
+<span
class="removed"><del><strong>href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/3.0/us/">Creative</strong></del></span>
+<span
class="inserted"><ins><em>href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/">Creative</em></ins></span>
+Commons <span class="removed"><del><strong>Attribution-NoDerivs 3.0 United
States</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0
International</em></ins></span> License</a>.</p>
<!--#include virtual="/server/bottom-notes.html" -->
-<span class="removed"><del><strong><p>Updated:</strong></del></span>
-
-<span class="inserted"><ins><em><p
class="unprintable">Updated:</em></ins></span>
+<p class="unprintable">Updated:
<!-- timestamp start -->
-$Date: 2015/05/23 06:11:15 $
+$Date: 2018/02/09 10:03:51 $
<!-- timestamp end -->
</p>
</div>
Index: po/why-copyleft.ko-diff.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/po/why-copyleft.ko-diff.html,v
retrieving revision 1.3
retrieving revision 1.4
diff -u -b -r1.3 -r1.4
--- po/why-copyleft.ko-diff.html 12 Apr 2014 14:00:03 -0000 1.3
+++ po/why-copyleft.ko-diff.html 9 Feb 2018 10:03:51 -0000 1.4
@@ -11,21 +11,13 @@
</style></head>
<body><pre>
<!--#include virtual="/server/header.html" -->
-<span class="inserted"><ins><em><!-- Parent-Version: 1.77
--></em></ins></span>
+<!-- Parent-Version: <span
class="removed"><del><strong>1.77</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>1.84</em></ins></span> -->
<title>Why Copyleft?
-- GNU Project - Free Software <span class="removed"><del><strong>Foundation
(FSF)</title></strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>Foundation</title></em></ins></span>
+- GNU Project - Free Software Foundation</title>
<!--#include virtual="/philosophy/po/why-copyleft.translist" -->
<!--#include virtual="/server/banner.html" -->
<h2>Why Copyleft?</h2>
-<span class="removed"><del><strong><!-- This document uses XHTML 1.0
Strict, but may be served as -->
-<!-- text/html. Please ensure that markup style considers -->
-<!-- appendex C of the XHTML 1.0 standard. See validator.w3.org. -->
-
-<!-- Please ensure links are consistent with Apache's MultiView. -->
-<!-- Change include statements to be consistent with the relevant -->
-<!-- language, where necessary. --></strong></del></span>
-
<p>
<cite>“When it comes to defending the freedom of others, to lie
down and do nothing is an act of weakness, not humility.”</cite>
@@ -51,48 +43,55 @@
</p>
<p>
-Humility is abnegating your own self interest, but you and the one who
-uses your code are not the only ones affected by your choice of which
-free software license to use for your code. Someone who uses your
-code in a <span class="removed"><del><strong>non-free</strong></del></span>
<span class="inserted"><ins><em>nonfree</em></ins></span> program is trying to
deny freedom to others, and if
-you let him do it, you're failing to defend their freedom. When it
-comes to defending the freedom of others, to lie down and do nothing
-is an act of weakness, not humility.
+Humility is <span
class="removed"><del><strong>abnegating</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>disregarding</em></ins></span> your own <span
class="removed"><del><strong>self interest,</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>self-interest,</em></ins></span> but <span
class="removed"><del><strong>you and</strong></del></span> the <span
class="removed"><del><strong>one who
+uses</strong></del></span> <span class="inserted"><ins><em>interest you
+abandon when you don't copyleft</em></ins></span> your code <span
class="removed"><del><strong>are not the only ones affected by your choice of
which
+free software license to use for</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>is much bigger than</em></ins></span> your <span
class="removed"><del><strong>code.</strong></del></span>
+<span class="inserted"><ins><em>own.</em></ins></span> Someone who uses your
code in a nonfree program is <span class="removed"><del><strong>trying to
deny</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>denying</em></ins></span>
+freedom to others, <span
class="removed"><del><strong>and</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>so</em></ins></span> if you <span
class="removed"><del><strong>let him do it,</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>allow that,</em></ins></span> you're failing to
defend <span class="removed"><del><strong>their</strong></del></span>
+<span class="inserted"><ins><em>those people's</em></ins></span> freedom.
When it comes to defending <span class="removed"><del><strong>the freedom of
others,</strong></del></span> <span class="inserted"><ins><em>everyone's
+freedom,</em></ins></span> to lie down and do nothing is an act of weakness,
not
+humility.
</p>
<p>
-Releasing your code under one of the BSD licenses, or some other
-permissive non-copyleft license, is not doing wrong; the program is
-still free software, and still a contribution to our community. But
-it is weak, and in most cases it is not the best way to promote users'
-freedom to share and change software.
-</p>
-
-<span class="removed"><del><strong><!-- If needed, change the copyright
block at the bottom. In general, -->
-<!-- all pages on the GNU web server should have the section about -->
-<!-- verbatim copying. Please do NOT remove this without talking -->
-<!-- with the webmasters first. -->
-<!-- Please make sure the copyright date is consistent with the document
-->
-<!-- and that it is like this "2001, 2002" not this "2001-2002."
--></strong></del></span>
+Releasing your code under <span class="inserted"><ins><em><a
href="/licenses/bsd.html"></em></ins></span> one of the BSD <span
class="removed"><del><strong>licenses,</strong></del></span>
+<span class="inserted"><ins><em>licenses</a>,</em></ins></span> or some
other <span class="inserted"><ins><em>lax,</em></ins></span> permissive <span
class="removed"><del><strong>non-copyleft</strong></del></span> license, is not
doing
+wrong; the program is still free software, and still a contribution to
+our community. But it is weak, and in most cases it is not the best
+way to promote users' freedom to share and change software.
+</p>
+
+<span class="inserted"><ins><em><p>
+Here are specific examples of nonfree versions of free programs
+that have done major harm to the free world.</p>
+
+<ul>
+<li>Those who released LLVM under a non-copyleft
+license <a
href="https://www.anandtech.com/show/5238/nvidia-releases-cuda-41-cuda-goes-llvm-and-open-source-kind-of">enabled
+nVidia to release a high-quality nonfree compiler</a> for its GPUs,
+while keeping its instruction set secret. Thus, we can't write a free
+compiler for that platform without a big reverse engineering job. The
+nonfree adaptation of LLVM is the only compiler for those machines,
+and is likely to remain so.</li>
+
+<li>Intel uses
+<a
href="http://www.tomshardware.com/news/google-removing-minix-management-engine-intel,35876.html">a
+proprietary version of the MINIX system</a>, which is free but not
+copylefted, in the Management Engine back door in its modern
+processors.</li>
+</ul></em></ins></span>
</div><!-- for id="content", starts in the include above -->
<!--#include virtual="/server/footer.html" -->
<div id="footer">
+<div class="unprintable">
-<span class="removed"><del><strong><p>
-Please</strong></del></span>
-<span class="inserted"><ins><em><div class="unprintable">
-
-<p>Please</em></ins></span> send <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>general</em></ins></span> FSF & GNU inquiries to
+<p>Please send general FSF & GNU inquiries to
<a href="mailto:address@hidden"><address@hidden></a>.
There are also <a href="/contact/">other ways to contact</a>
-the FSF.
-<span class="removed"><del><strong><br />
-Please send broken</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>Broken</em></ins></span> links and other corrections
or suggestions <span class="inserted"><ins><em>can be sent</em></ins></span>
-to <a <span
class="removed"><del><strong>href="mailto:address@hidden"><address@hidden></a>.
-</p>
-
-<p></strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>href="mailto:address@hidden"><address@hidden></a>.</p>
+the FSF. Broken links and other corrections or suggestions can be sent
+to <a
href="mailto:address@hidden"><address@hidden></a>.</p>
<p><!-- TRANSLATORS: Ignore the original text in this paragraph,
replace it with the translation of these two:
@@ -106,20 +105,16 @@
<p>For information on coordinating and submitting translations of
our web pages, see <a
href="/server/standards/README.translations.html">Translations
- README</a>. --></em></ins></span>
+ README</a>. -->
Please see the <a
href="/server/standards/README.translations.html">Translations
README</a> for information on coordinating and submitting translations
-of this <span class="removed"><del><strong>article.
-</p>
-
-<p>
-Copyright</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>article.</p>
+of this article.</p>
</div>
<!-- Regarding copyright, in general, standalone pages (as opposed to
files generated as part of manuals) on the GNU web server should
- be under CC BY-ND 3.0 US. Please do NOT change or remove this
+ be under CC BY-ND <span class="removed"><del><strong>3.0
US.</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>4.0.</em></ins></span> Please do NOT change or
remove this
without talking with the webmasters or licensing team first.
Please make sure the copyright date is consistent with the
document. For web pages, it is ok to list just the latest year the
@@ -134,22 +129,18 @@
There is more detail about copyright years in the GNU Maintainers
Information document, www.gnu.org/prep/maintain. -->
-<p>Copyright</em></ins></span> © 2003, 2007, <span
class="removed"><del><strong>2008</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>2008, 2013</em></ins></span> Free Software
Foundation, <span class="removed"><del><strong>Inc.,
-</p>
-<address>51 Franklin St, Fifth Floor, Boston, MA 02110,
USA</address></strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>Inc.</p></em></ins></span>
+<p>Copyright © 2003, 2007, 2008, <span
class="removed"><del><strong>2013</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>2013, 2017, 2018</em></ins></span> Free Software
Foundation, Inc.</p>
<p>This page is licensed under a <a rel="license"
-href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/3.0/us/">Creative
-Commons Attribution-NoDerivs 3.0 United States <span
class="removed"><del><strong>License</a>.
-</p></strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>License</a>.</p></em></ins></span>
+<span
class="removed"><del><strong>href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/3.0/us/">Creative</strong></del></span>
+<span
class="inserted"><ins><em>href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/">Creative</em></ins></span>
+Commons <span class="removed"><del><strong>Attribution-NoDerivs 3.0 United
States</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0
International</em></ins></span> License</a>.</p>
<!--#include virtual="/server/bottom-notes.html" -->
-<span class="removed"><del><strong><p>Updated:</strong></del></span>
-
-<span class="inserted"><ins><em><p
class="unprintable">Updated:</em></ins></span>
+<p class="unprintable">Updated:
<!-- timestamp start -->
-$Date: 2014/04/12 14:00:03 $
+$Date: 2018/02/09 10:03:51 $
<!-- timestamp end -->
</p>
</div>
Index: po/why-copyleft.nl-diff.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/po/why-copyleft.nl-diff.html,v
retrieving revision 1.3
retrieving revision 1.4
diff -u -b -r1.3 -r1.4
--- po/why-copyleft.nl-diff.html 12 Apr 2014 14:00:03 -0000 1.3
+++ po/why-copyleft.nl-diff.html 9 Feb 2018 10:03:51 -0000 1.4
@@ -11,21 +11,13 @@
</style></head>
<body><pre>
<!--#include virtual="/server/header.html" -->
-<span class="inserted"><ins><em><!-- Parent-Version: 1.77
--></em></ins></span>
+<!-- Parent-Version: <span
class="removed"><del><strong>1.77</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>1.84</em></ins></span> -->
<title>Why Copyleft?
-- GNU Project - Free Software <span class="removed"><del><strong>Foundation
(FSF)</title></strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>Foundation</title></em></ins></span>
+- GNU Project - Free Software Foundation</title>
<!--#include virtual="/philosophy/po/why-copyleft.translist" -->
<!--#include virtual="/server/banner.html" -->
<h2>Why Copyleft?</h2>
-<span class="removed"><del><strong><!-- This document uses XHTML 1.0
Strict, but may be served as -->
-<!-- text/html. Please ensure that markup style considers -->
-<!-- appendex C of the XHTML 1.0 standard. See validator.w3.org. -->
-
-<!-- Please ensure links are consistent with Apache's MultiView. -->
-<!-- Change include statements to be consistent with the relevant -->
-<!-- language, where necessary. --></strong></del></span>
-
<p>
<cite>“When it comes to defending the freedom of others, to lie
down and do nothing is an act of weakness, not humility.”</cite>
@@ -51,48 +43,55 @@
</p>
<p>
-Humility is abnegating your own self interest, but you and the one who
-uses your code are not the only ones affected by your choice of which
-free software license to use for your code. Someone who uses your
-code in a <span class="removed"><del><strong>non-free</strong></del></span>
<span class="inserted"><ins><em>nonfree</em></ins></span> program is trying to
deny freedom to others, and if
-you let him do it, you're failing to defend their freedom. When it
-comes to defending the freedom of others, to lie down and do nothing
-is an act of weakness, not humility.
+Humility is <span
class="removed"><del><strong>abnegating</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>disregarding</em></ins></span> your own <span
class="removed"><del><strong>self interest,</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>self-interest,</em></ins></span> but <span
class="removed"><del><strong>you and</strong></del></span> the <span
class="removed"><del><strong>one who
+uses</strong></del></span> <span class="inserted"><ins><em>interest you
+abandon when you don't copyleft</em></ins></span> your code <span
class="removed"><del><strong>are not the only ones affected by your choice of
which
+free software license to use for</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>is much bigger than</em></ins></span> your <span
class="removed"><del><strong>code.</strong></del></span>
+<span class="inserted"><ins><em>own.</em></ins></span> Someone who uses your
code in a nonfree program is <span class="removed"><del><strong>trying to
deny</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>denying</em></ins></span>
+freedom to others, <span
class="removed"><del><strong>and</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>so</em></ins></span> if you <span
class="removed"><del><strong>let him do it,</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>allow that,</em></ins></span> you're failing to
defend <span class="removed"><del><strong>their</strong></del></span>
+<span class="inserted"><ins><em>those people's</em></ins></span> freedom.
When it comes to defending <span class="removed"><del><strong>the freedom of
others,</strong></del></span> <span class="inserted"><ins><em>everyone's
+freedom,</em></ins></span> to lie down and do nothing is an act of weakness,
not
+humility.
</p>
<p>
-Releasing your code under one of the BSD licenses, or some other
-permissive non-copyleft license, is not doing wrong; the program is
-still free software, and still a contribution to our community. But
-it is weak, and in most cases it is not the best way to promote users'
-freedom to share and change software.
-</p>
-
-<span class="removed"><del><strong><!-- If needed, change the copyright
block at the bottom. In general, -->
-<!-- all pages on the GNU web server should have the section about -->
-<!-- verbatim copying. Please do NOT remove this without talking -->
-<!-- with the webmasters first. -->
-<!-- Please make sure the copyright date is consistent with the document
-->
-<!-- and that it is like this "2001, 2002" not this "2001-2002."
--></strong></del></span>
+Releasing your code under <span class="inserted"><ins><em><a
href="/licenses/bsd.html"></em></ins></span> one of the BSD <span
class="removed"><del><strong>licenses,</strong></del></span>
+<span class="inserted"><ins><em>licenses</a>,</em></ins></span> or some
other <span class="inserted"><ins><em>lax,</em></ins></span> permissive <span
class="removed"><del><strong>non-copyleft</strong></del></span> license, is not
doing
+wrong; the program is still free software, and still a contribution to
+our community. But it is weak, and in most cases it is not the best
+way to promote users' freedom to share and change software.
+</p>
+
+<span class="inserted"><ins><em><p>
+Here are specific examples of nonfree versions of free programs
+that have done major harm to the free world.</p>
+
+<ul>
+<li>Those who released LLVM under a non-copyleft
+license <a
href="https://www.anandtech.com/show/5238/nvidia-releases-cuda-41-cuda-goes-llvm-and-open-source-kind-of">enabled
+nVidia to release a high-quality nonfree compiler</a> for its GPUs,
+while keeping its instruction set secret. Thus, we can't write a free
+compiler for that platform without a big reverse engineering job. The
+nonfree adaptation of LLVM is the only compiler for those machines,
+and is likely to remain so.</li>
+
+<li>Intel uses
+<a
href="http://www.tomshardware.com/news/google-removing-minix-management-engine-intel,35876.html">a
+proprietary version of the MINIX system</a>, which is free but not
+copylefted, in the Management Engine back door in its modern
+processors.</li>
+</ul></em></ins></span>
</div><!-- for id="content", starts in the include above -->
<!--#include virtual="/server/footer.html" -->
<div id="footer">
+<div class="unprintable">
-<span class="removed"><del><strong><p>
-Please</strong></del></span>
-<span class="inserted"><ins><em><div class="unprintable">
-
-<p>Please</em></ins></span> send <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>general</em></ins></span> FSF & GNU inquiries to
+<p>Please send general FSF & GNU inquiries to
<a href="mailto:address@hidden"><address@hidden></a>.
There are also <a href="/contact/">other ways to contact</a>
-the FSF.
-<span class="removed"><del><strong><br />
-Please send broken</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>Broken</em></ins></span> links and other corrections
or suggestions <span class="inserted"><ins><em>can be sent</em></ins></span>
-to <a <span
class="removed"><del><strong>href="mailto:address@hidden"><address@hidden></a>.
-</p>
-
-<p></strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>href="mailto:address@hidden"><address@hidden></a>.</p>
+the FSF. Broken links and other corrections or suggestions can be sent
+to <a
href="mailto:address@hidden"><address@hidden></a>.</p>
<p><!-- TRANSLATORS: Ignore the original text in this paragraph,
replace it with the translation of these two:
@@ -106,20 +105,16 @@
<p>For information on coordinating and submitting translations of
our web pages, see <a
href="/server/standards/README.translations.html">Translations
- README</a>. --></em></ins></span>
+ README</a>. -->
Please see the <a
href="/server/standards/README.translations.html">Translations
README</a> for information on coordinating and submitting translations
-of this <span class="removed"><del><strong>article.
-</p>
-
-<p>
-Copyright</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>article.</p>
+of this article.</p>
</div>
<!-- Regarding copyright, in general, standalone pages (as opposed to
files generated as part of manuals) on the GNU web server should
- be under CC BY-ND 3.0 US. Please do NOT change or remove this
+ be under CC BY-ND <span class="removed"><del><strong>3.0
US.</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>4.0.</em></ins></span> Please do NOT change or
remove this
without talking with the webmasters or licensing team first.
Please make sure the copyright date is consistent with the
document. For web pages, it is ok to list just the latest year the
@@ -134,22 +129,18 @@
There is more detail about copyright years in the GNU Maintainers
Information document, www.gnu.org/prep/maintain. -->
-<p>Copyright</em></ins></span> © 2003, 2007, <span
class="removed"><del><strong>2008</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>2008, 2013</em></ins></span> Free Software
Foundation, <span class="removed"><del><strong>Inc.,
-</p>
-<address>51 Franklin St, Fifth Floor, Boston, MA 02110,
USA</address></strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>Inc.</p></em></ins></span>
+<p>Copyright © 2003, 2007, 2008, <span
class="removed"><del><strong>2013</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>2013, 2017, 2018</em></ins></span> Free Software
Foundation, Inc.</p>
<p>This page is licensed under a <a rel="license"
-href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/3.0/us/">Creative
-Commons Attribution-NoDerivs 3.0 United States <span
class="removed"><del><strong>License</a>.
-</p></strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>License</a>.</p></em></ins></span>
+<span
class="removed"><del><strong>href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/3.0/us/">Creative</strong></del></span>
+<span
class="inserted"><ins><em>href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/">Creative</em></ins></span>
+Commons <span class="removed"><del><strong>Attribution-NoDerivs 3.0 United
States</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0
International</em></ins></span> License</a>.</p>
<!--#include virtual="/server/bottom-notes.html" -->
-<span class="removed"><del><strong><p>Updated:</strong></del></span>
-
-<span class="inserted"><ins><em><p
class="unprintable">Updated:</em></ins></span>
+<p class="unprintable">Updated:
<!-- timestamp start -->
-$Date: 2014/04/12 14:00:03 $
+$Date: 2018/02/09 10:03:51 $
<!-- timestamp end -->
</p>
</div>
Index: po/why-copyleft.ar-diff.html
===================================================================
RCS file: po/why-copyleft.ar-diff.html
diff -N po/why-copyleft.ar-diff.html
--- /dev/null 1 Jan 1970 00:00:00 -0000
+++ po/why-copyleft.ar-diff.html 9 Feb 2018 10:03:51 -0000 1.1
@@ -0,0 +1,150 @@
+<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Strict//EN"
+ "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-strict.dtd";>
+<!-- Generated by GNUN -->
+<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"; xml:lang="en" lang="en">
+<head>
+<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8" />
+<title>/philosophy/why-copyleft.html-diff</title>
+<style type="text/css">
+span.removed { background-color: #f22; color: #000; }
+span.inserted { background-color: #2f2; color: #000; }
+</style></head>
+<body><pre>
+<!--#include virtual="/server/header.html" -->
+<!-- Parent-Version: <span
class="removed"><del><strong>1.77</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>1.84</em></ins></span> -->
+<title>Why Copyleft?
+- GNU Project - Free Software Foundation</title>
+<!--#include virtual="/philosophy/po/why-copyleft.translist" -->
+<!--#include virtual="/server/banner.html" -->
+<h2>Why Copyleft?</h2>
+
+<p>
+<cite>“When it comes to defending the freedom of others, to lie
+down and do nothing is an act of weakness, not humility.”</cite>
+</p>
+
+<p>
+In the GNU Project we usually recommend people
+use <a href="/copyleft/copyleft.html">copyleft</a> licenses like
GNU
+GPL, rather than permissive non-copyleft free software licenses. We
+don't argue harshly against the non-copyleft licenses—in fact,
+we occasionally recommend them in special circumstances—but the
+advocates of those licenses show a pattern of arguing harshly against
+the <acronym title="General Public License">GPL</acronym>.
+</p>
+
+<p>
+In one such argument, a person stated that his use of one of the BSD
+licenses was an “act of humility”: “I ask nothing of
+those who use my code, except to credit me.” It is rather a
+stretch to describe a legal demand for credit as
+“humility”, but there is a deeper point to be considered
+here.
+</p>
+
+<p>
+Humility is <span
class="removed"><del><strong>abnegating</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>disregarding</em></ins></span> your own <span
class="removed"><del><strong>self interest,</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>self-interest,</em></ins></span> but <span
class="removed"><del><strong>you and</strong></del></span> the <span
class="removed"><del><strong>one who
+uses</strong></del></span> <span class="inserted"><ins><em>interest you
+abandon when you don't copyleft</em></ins></span> your code <span
class="removed"><del><strong>are not the only ones affected by your choice of
which
+free software license to use for</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>is much bigger than</em></ins></span> your <span
class="removed"><del><strong>code.</strong></del></span>
+<span class="inserted"><ins><em>own.</em></ins></span> Someone who uses your
code in a nonfree program is <span class="removed"><del><strong>trying to
deny</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>denying</em></ins></span>
+freedom to others, <span
class="removed"><del><strong>and</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>so</em></ins></span> if you <span
class="removed"><del><strong>let him do it,</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>allow that,</em></ins></span> you're failing to
defend <span class="removed"><del><strong>their</strong></del></span>
+<span class="inserted"><ins><em>those people's</em></ins></span> freedom.
When it comes to defending <span class="removed"><del><strong>the freedom of
others,</strong></del></span> <span class="inserted"><ins><em>everyone's
+freedom,</em></ins></span> to lie down and do nothing is an act of weakness,
not
+humility.
+</p>
+
+<p>
+Releasing your code under <span class="inserted"><ins><em><a
href="/licenses/bsd.html"></em></ins></span> one of the BSD <span
class="removed"><del><strong>licenses,</strong></del></span>
+<span class="inserted"><ins><em>licenses</a>,</em></ins></span> or some
other <span class="inserted"><ins><em>lax,</em></ins></span> permissive <span
class="removed"><del><strong>non-copyleft</strong></del></span> license, is not
doing
+wrong; the program is still free software, and still a contribution to
+our community. But it is weak, and in most cases it is not the best
+way to promote users' freedom to share and change software.
+</p>
+
+<span class="inserted"><ins><em><p>
+Here are specific examples of nonfree versions of free programs
+that have done major harm to the free world.</p>
+
+<ul>
+<li>Those who released LLVM under a non-copyleft
+license <a
href="https://www.anandtech.com/show/5238/nvidia-releases-cuda-41-cuda-goes-llvm-and-open-source-kind-of">enabled
+nVidia to release a high-quality nonfree compiler</a> for its GPUs,
+while keeping its instruction set secret. Thus, we can't write a free
+compiler for that platform without a big reverse engineering job. The
+nonfree adaptation of LLVM is the only compiler for those machines,
+and is likely to remain so.</li>
+
+<li>Intel uses
+<a
href="http://www.tomshardware.com/news/google-removing-minix-management-engine-intel,35876.html">a
+proprietary version of the MINIX system</a>, which is free but not
+copylefted, in the Management Engine back door in its modern
+processors.</li>
+</ul></em></ins></span>
+
+</div><!-- for id="content", starts in the include above -->
+<!--#include virtual="/server/footer.html" -->
+<div id="footer">
+<div class="unprintable">
+
+<p>Please send general FSF & GNU inquiries to
+<a href="mailto:address@hidden"><address@hidden></a>.
+There are also <a href="/contact/">other ways to contact</a>
+the FSF. Broken links and other corrections or suggestions can be sent
+to <a
href="mailto:address@hidden"><address@hidden></a>.</p>
+
+<p><!-- TRANSLATORS: Ignore the original text in this paragraph,
+ replace it with the translation of these two:
+
+ We work hard and do our best to provide accurate, good quality
+ translations. However, we are not exempt from imperfection.
+ Please send your comments and general suggestions in this regard
+ to <a href="mailto:address@hidden">
+ <address@hidden></a>.</p>
+
+ <p>For information on coordinating and submitting translations of
+ our web pages, see <a
+ href="/server/standards/README.translations.html">Translations
+ README</a>. -->
+Please see the <a
+href="/server/standards/README.translations.html">Translations
+README</a> for information on coordinating and submitting translations
+of this article.</p>
+</div>
+
+<!-- Regarding copyright, in general, standalone pages (as opposed to
+ files generated as part of manuals) on the GNU web server should
+ be under CC BY-ND <span class="removed"><del><strong>3.0
US.</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>4.0.</em></ins></span> Please do NOT change or
remove this
+ without talking with the webmasters or licensing team first.
+ Please make sure the copyright date is consistent with the
+ document. For web pages, it is ok to list just the latest year the
+ document was modified, or published.
+
+ If you wish to list earlier years, that is ok too.
+ Either "2001, 2002, 2003" or "2001-2003" are ok for specifying
+ years, as long as each year in the range is in fact a copyrightable
+ year, i.e., a year in which the document was published (including
+ being publicly visible on the web or in a revision control system).
+
+ There is more detail about copyright years in the GNU Maintainers
+ Information document, www.gnu.org/prep/maintain. -->
+
+<p>Copyright © 2003, 2007, 2008, <span
class="removed"><del><strong>2013</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>2013, 2017, 2018</em></ins></span> Free Software
Foundation, Inc.</p>
+
+<p>This page is licensed under a <a rel="license"
+<span
class="removed"><del><strong>href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/3.0/us/">Creative</strong></del></span>
+<span
class="inserted"><ins><em>href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/">Creative</em></ins></span>
+Commons <span class="removed"><del><strong>Attribution-NoDerivs 3.0 United
States</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0
International</em></ins></span> License</a>.</p>
+
+<!--#include virtual="/server/bottom-notes.html" -->
+
+<p class="unprintable">Updated:
+<!-- timestamp start -->
+$Date: 2018/02/09 10:03:51 $
+<!-- timestamp end -->
+</p>
+</div>
+</div>
+</body>
+</html>
+</pre></body></html>
Index: po/why-copyleft.bg-diff.html
===================================================================
RCS file: po/why-copyleft.bg-diff.html
diff -N po/why-copyleft.bg-diff.html
--- /dev/null 1 Jan 1970 00:00:00 -0000
+++ po/why-copyleft.bg-diff.html 9 Feb 2018 10:03:51 -0000 1.1
@@ -0,0 +1,150 @@
+<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Strict//EN"
+ "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-strict.dtd";>
+<!-- Generated by GNUN -->
+<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"; xml:lang="en" lang="en">
+<head>
+<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8" />
+<title>/philosophy/why-copyleft.html-diff</title>
+<style type="text/css">
+span.removed { background-color: #f22; color: #000; }
+span.inserted { background-color: #2f2; color: #000; }
+</style></head>
+<body><pre>
+<!--#include virtual="/server/header.html" -->
+<!-- Parent-Version: <span
class="removed"><del><strong>1.77</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>1.84</em></ins></span> -->
+<title>Why Copyleft?
+- GNU Project - Free Software Foundation</title>
+<!--#include virtual="/philosophy/po/why-copyleft.translist" -->
+<!--#include virtual="/server/banner.html" -->
+<h2>Why Copyleft?</h2>
+
+<p>
+<cite>“When it comes to defending the freedom of others, to lie
+down and do nothing is an act of weakness, not humility.”</cite>
+</p>
+
+<p>
+In the GNU Project we usually recommend people
+use <a href="/copyleft/copyleft.html">copyleft</a> licenses like
GNU
+GPL, rather than permissive non-copyleft free software licenses. We
+don't argue harshly against the non-copyleft licenses—in fact,
+we occasionally recommend them in special circumstances—but the
+advocates of those licenses show a pattern of arguing harshly against
+the <acronym title="General Public License">GPL</acronym>.
+</p>
+
+<p>
+In one such argument, a person stated that his use of one of the BSD
+licenses was an “act of humility”: “I ask nothing of
+those who use my code, except to credit me.” It is rather a
+stretch to describe a legal demand for credit as
+“humility”, but there is a deeper point to be considered
+here.
+</p>
+
+<p>
+Humility is <span
class="removed"><del><strong>abnegating</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>disregarding</em></ins></span> your own <span
class="removed"><del><strong>self interest,</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>self-interest,</em></ins></span> but <span
class="removed"><del><strong>you and</strong></del></span> the <span
class="removed"><del><strong>one who
+uses</strong></del></span> <span class="inserted"><ins><em>interest you
+abandon when you don't copyleft</em></ins></span> your code <span
class="removed"><del><strong>are not the only ones affected by your choice of
which
+free software license to use for</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>is much bigger than</em></ins></span> your <span
class="removed"><del><strong>code.</strong></del></span>
+<span class="inserted"><ins><em>own.</em></ins></span> Someone who uses your
code in a nonfree program is <span class="removed"><del><strong>trying to
deny</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>denying</em></ins></span>
+freedom to others, <span
class="removed"><del><strong>and</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>so</em></ins></span> if you <span
class="removed"><del><strong>let him do it,</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>allow that,</em></ins></span> you're failing to
defend <span class="removed"><del><strong>their</strong></del></span>
+<span class="inserted"><ins><em>those people's</em></ins></span> freedom.
When it comes to defending <span class="removed"><del><strong>the freedom of
others,</strong></del></span> <span class="inserted"><ins><em>everyone's
+freedom,</em></ins></span> to lie down and do nothing is an act of weakness,
not
+humility.
+</p>
+
+<p>
+Releasing your code under <span class="inserted"><ins><em><a
href="/licenses/bsd.html"></em></ins></span> one of the BSD <span
class="removed"><del><strong>licenses,</strong></del></span>
+<span class="inserted"><ins><em>licenses</a>,</em></ins></span> or some
other <span class="inserted"><ins><em>lax,</em></ins></span> permissive <span
class="removed"><del><strong>non-copyleft</strong></del></span> license, is not
doing
+wrong; the program is still free software, and still a contribution to
+our community. But it is weak, and in most cases it is not the best
+way to promote users' freedom to share and change software.
+</p>
+
+<span class="inserted"><ins><em><p>
+Here are specific examples of nonfree versions of free programs
+that have done major harm to the free world.</p>
+
+<ul>
+<li>Those who released LLVM under a non-copyleft
+license <a
href="https://www.anandtech.com/show/5238/nvidia-releases-cuda-41-cuda-goes-llvm-and-open-source-kind-of">enabled
+nVidia to release a high-quality nonfree compiler</a> for its GPUs,
+while keeping its instruction set secret. Thus, we can't write a free
+compiler for that platform without a big reverse engineering job. The
+nonfree adaptation of LLVM is the only compiler for those machines,
+and is likely to remain so.</li>
+
+<li>Intel uses
+<a
href="http://www.tomshardware.com/news/google-removing-minix-management-engine-intel,35876.html">a
+proprietary version of the MINIX system</a>, which is free but not
+copylefted, in the Management Engine back door in its modern
+processors.</li>
+</ul></em></ins></span>
+
+</div><!-- for id="content", starts in the include above -->
+<!--#include virtual="/server/footer.html" -->
+<div id="footer">
+<div class="unprintable">
+
+<p>Please send general FSF & GNU inquiries to
+<a href="mailto:address@hidden"><address@hidden></a>.
+There are also <a href="/contact/">other ways to contact</a>
+the FSF. Broken links and other corrections or suggestions can be sent
+to <a
href="mailto:address@hidden"><address@hidden></a>.</p>
+
+<p><!-- TRANSLATORS: Ignore the original text in this paragraph,
+ replace it with the translation of these two:
+
+ We work hard and do our best to provide accurate, good quality
+ translations. However, we are not exempt from imperfection.
+ Please send your comments and general suggestions in this regard
+ to <a href="mailto:address@hidden">
+ <address@hidden></a>.</p>
+
+ <p>For information on coordinating and submitting translations of
+ our web pages, see <a
+ href="/server/standards/README.translations.html">Translations
+ README</a>. -->
+Please see the <a
+href="/server/standards/README.translations.html">Translations
+README</a> for information on coordinating and submitting translations
+of this article.</p>
+</div>
+
+<!-- Regarding copyright, in general, standalone pages (as opposed to
+ files generated as part of manuals) on the GNU web server should
+ be under CC BY-ND <span class="removed"><del><strong>3.0
US.</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>4.0.</em></ins></span> Please do NOT change or
remove this
+ without talking with the webmasters or licensing team first.
+ Please make sure the copyright date is consistent with the
+ document. For web pages, it is ok to list just the latest year the
+ document was modified, or published.
+
+ If you wish to list earlier years, that is ok too.
+ Either "2001, 2002, 2003" or "2001-2003" are ok for specifying
+ years, as long as each year in the range is in fact a copyrightable
+ year, i.e., a year in which the document was published (including
+ being publicly visible on the web or in a revision control system).
+
+ There is more detail about copyright years in the GNU Maintainers
+ Information document, www.gnu.org/prep/maintain. -->
+
+<p>Copyright © 2003, 2007, 2008, <span
class="removed"><del><strong>2013</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>2013, 2017, 2018</em></ins></span> Free Software
Foundation, Inc.</p>
+
+<p>This page is licensed under a <a rel="license"
+<span
class="removed"><del><strong>href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/3.0/us/">Creative</strong></del></span>
+<span
class="inserted"><ins><em>href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/">Creative</em></ins></span>
+Commons <span class="removed"><del><strong>Attribution-NoDerivs 3.0 United
States</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0
International</em></ins></span> License</a>.</p>
+
+<!--#include virtual="/server/bottom-notes.html" -->
+
+<p class="unprintable">Updated:
+<!-- timestamp start -->
+$Date: 2018/02/09 10:03:51 $
+<!-- timestamp end -->
+</p>
+</div>
+</div>
+</body>
+</html>
+</pre></body></html>
Index: po/why-copyleft.ca-diff.html
===================================================================
RCS file: po/why-copyleft.ca-diff.html
diff -N po/why-copyleft.ca-diff.html
--- /dev/null 1 Jan 1970 00:00:00 -0000
+++ po/why-copyleft.ca-diff.html 9 Feb 2018 10:03:51 -0000 1.1
@@ -0,0 +1,150 @@
+<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Strict//EN"
+ "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-strict.dtd";>
+<!-- Generated by GNUN -->
+<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"; xml:lang="en" lang="en">
+<head>
+<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8" />
+<title>/philosophy/why-copyleft.html-diff</title>
+<style type="text/css">
+span.removed { background-color: #f22; color: #000; }
+span.inserted { background-color: #2f2; color: #000; }
+</style></head>
+<body><pre>
+<!--#include virtual="/server/header.html" -->
+<!-- Parent-Version: <span
class="removed"><del><strong>1.77</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>1.84</em></ins></span> -->
+<title>Why Copyleft?
+- GNU Project - Free Software Foundation</title>
+<!--#include virtual="/philosophy/po/why-copyleft.translist" -->
+<!--#include virtual="/server/banner.html" -->
+<h2>Why Copyleft?</h2>
+
+<p>
+<cite>“When it comes to defending the freedom of others, to lie
+down and do nothing is an act of weakness, not humility.”</cite>
+</p>
+
+<p>
+In the GNU Project we usually recommend people
+use <a href="/copyleft/copyleft.html">copyleft</a> licenses like
GNU
+GPL, rather than permissive non-copyleft free software licenses. We
+don't argue harshly against the non-copyleft licenses—in fact,
+we occasionally recommend them in special circumstances—but the
+advocates of those licenses show a pattern of arguing harshly against
+the <acronym title="General Public License">GPL</acronym>.
+</p>
+
+<p>
+In one such argument, a person stated that his use of one of the BSD
+licenses was an “act of humility”: “I ask nothing of
+those who use my code, except to credit me.” It is rather a
+stretch to describe a legal demand for credit as
+“humility”, but there is a deeper point to be considered
+here.
+</p>
+
+<p>
+Humility is <span
class="removed"><del><strong>abnegating</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>disregarding</em></ins></span> your own <span
class="removed"><del><strong>self interest,</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>self-interest,</em></ins></span> but <span
class="removed"><del><strong>you and</strong></del></span> the <span
class="removed"><del><strong>one who
+uses</strong></del></span> <span class="inserted"><ins><em>interest you
+abandon when you don't copyleft</em></ins></span> your code <span
class="removed"><del><strong>are not the only ones affected by your choice of
which
+free software license to use for</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>is much bigger than</em></ins></span> your <span
class="removed"><del><strong>code.</strong></del></span>
+<span class="inserted"><ins><em>own.</em></ins></span> Someone who uses your
code in a nonfree program is <span class="removed"><del><strong>trying to
deny</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>denying</em></ins></span>
+freedom to others, <span
class="removed"><del><strong>and</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>so</em></ins></span> if you <span
class="removed"><del><strong>let him do it,</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>allow that,</em></ins></span> you're failing to
defend <span class="removed"><del><strong>their</strong></del></span>
+<span class="inserted"><ins><em>those people's</em></ins></span> freedom.
When it comes to defending <span class="removed"><del><strong>the freedom of
others,</strong></del></span> <span class="inserted"><ins><em>everyone's
+freedom,</em></ins></span> to lie down and do nothing is an act of weakness,
not
+humility.
+</p>
+
+<p>
+Releasing your code under <span class="inserted"><ins><em><a
href="/licenses/bsd.html"></em></ins></span> one of the BSD <span
class="removed"><del><strong>licenses,</strong></del></span>
+<span class="inserted"><ins><em>licenses</a>,</em></ins></span> or some
other <span class="inserted"><ins><em>lax,</em></ins></span> permissive <span
class="removed"><del><strong>non-copyleft</strong></del></span> license, is not
doing
+wrong; the program is still free software, and still a contribution to
+our community. But it is weak, and in most cases it is not the best
+way to promote users' freedom to share and change software.
+</p>
+
+<span class="inserted"><ins><em><p>
+Here are specific examples of nonfree versions of free programs
+that have done major harm to the free world.</p>
+
+<ul>
+<li>Those who released LLVM under a non-copyleft
+license <a
href="https://www.anandtech.com/show/5238/nvidia-releases-cuda-41-cuda-goes-llvm-and-open-source-kind-of">enabled
+nVidia to release a high-quality nonfree compiler</a> for its GPUs,
+while keeping its instruction set secret. Thus, we can't write a free
+compiler for that platform without a big reverse engineering job. The
+nonfree adaptation of LLVM is the only compiler for those machines,
+and is likely to remain so.</li>
+
+<li>Intel uses
+<a
href="http://www.tomshardware.com/news/google-removing-minix-management-engine-intel,35876.html">a
+proprietary version of the MINIX system</a>, which is free but not
+copylefted, in the Management Engine back door in its modern
+processors.</li>
+</ul></em></ins></span>
+
+</div><!-- for id="content", starts in the include above -->
+<!--#include virtual="/server/footer.html" -->
+<div id="footer">
+<div class="unprintable">
+
+<p>Please send general FSF & GNU inquiries to
+<a href="mailto:address@hidden"><address@hidden></a>.
+There are also <a href="/contact/">other ways to contact</a>
+the FSF. Broken links and other corrections or suggestions can be sent
+to <a
href="mailto:address@hidden"><address@hidden></a>.</p>
+
+<p><!-- TRANSLATORS: Ignore the original text in this paragraph,
+ replace it with the translation of these two:
+
+ We work hard and do our best to provide accurate, good quality
+ translations. However, we are not exempt from imperfection.
+ Please send your comments and general suggestions in this regard
+ to <a href="mailto:address@hidden">
+ <address@hidden></a>.</p>
+
+ <p>For information on coordinating and submitting translations of
+ our web pages, see <a
+ href="/server/standards/README.translations.html">Translations
+ README</a>. -->
+Please see the <a
+href="/server/standards/README.translations.html">Translations
+README</a> for information on coordinating and submitting translations
+of this article.</p>
+</div>
+
+<!-- Regarding copyright, in general, standalone pages (as opposed to
+ files generated as part of manuals) on the GNU web server should
+ be under CC BY-ND <span class="removed"><del><strong>3.0
US.</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>4.0.</em></ins></span> Please do NOT change or
remove this
+ without talking with the webmasters or licensing team first.
+ Please make sure the copyright date is consistent with the
+ document. For web pages, it is ok to list just the latest year the
+ document was modified, or published.
+
+ If you wish to list earlier years, that is ok too.
+ Either "2001, 2002, 2003" or "2001-2003" are ok for specifying
+ years, as long as each year in the range is in fact a copyrightable
+ year, i.e., a year in which the document was published (including
+ being publicly visible on the web or in a revision control system).
+
+ There is more detail about copyright years in the GNU Maintainers
+ Information document, www.gnu.org/prep/maintain. -->
+
+<p>Copyright © 2003, 2007, 2008, <span
class="removed"><del><strong>2013</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>2013, 2017, 2018</em></ins></span> Free Software
Foundation, Inc.</p>
+
+<p>This page is licensed under a <a rel="license"
+<span
class="removed"><del><strong>href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/3.0/us/">Creative</strong></del></span>
+<span
class="inserted"><ins><em>href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/">Creative</em></ins></span>
+Commons <span class="removed"><del><strong>Attribution-NoDerivs 3.0 United
States</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0
International</em></ins></span> License</a>.</p>
+
+<!--#include virtual="/server/bottom-notes.html" -->
+
+<p class="unprintable">Updated:
+<!-- timestamp start -->
+$Date: 2018/02/09 10:03:51 $
+<!-- timestamp end -->
+</p>
+</div>
+</div>
+</body>
+</html>
+</pre></body></html>
Index: po/why-copyleft.it-diff.html
===================================================================
RCS file: po/why-copyleft.it-diff.html
diff -N po/why-copyleft.it-diff.html
--- /dev/null 1 Jan 1970 00:00:00 -0000
+++ po/why-copyleft.it-diff.html 9 Feb 2018 10:03:51 -0000 1.1
@@ -0,0 +1,150 @@
+<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Strict//EN"
+ "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-strict.dtd";>
+<!-- Generated by GNUN -->
+<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"; xml:lang="en" lang="en">
+<head>
+<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8" />
+<title>/philosophy/why-copyleft.html-diff</title>
+<style type="text/css">
+span.removed { background-color: #f22; color: #000; }
+span.inserted { background-color: #2f2; color: #000; }
+</style></head>
+<body><pre>
+<!--#include virtual="/server/header.html" -->
+<!-- Parent-Version: <span
class="removed"><del><strong>1.77</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>1.84</em></ins></span> -->
+<title>Why Copyleft?
+- GNU Project - Free Software Foundation</title>
+<!--#include virtual="/philosophy/po/why-copyleft.translist" -->
+<!--#include virtual="/server/banner.html" -->
+<h2>Why Copyleft?</h2>
+
+<p>
+<cite>“When it comes to defending the freedom of others, to lie
+down and do nothing is an act of weakness, not humility.”</cite>
+</p>
+
+<p>
+In the GNU Project we usually recommend people
+use <a href="/copyleft/copyleft.html">copyleft</a> licenses like
GNU
+GPL, rather than permissive non-copyleft free software licenses. We
+don't argue harshly against the non-copyleft licenses—in fact,
+we occasionally recommend them in special circumstances—but the
+advocates of those licenses show a pattern of arguing harshly against
+the <acronym title="General Public License">GPL</acronym>.
+</p>
+
+<p>
+In one such argument, a person stated that his use of one of the BSD
+licenses was an “act of humility”: “I ask nothing of
+those who use my code, except to credit me.” It is rather a
+stretch to describe a legal demand for credit as
+“humility”, but there is a deeper point to be considered
+here.
+</p>
+
+<p>
+Humility is <span
class="removed"><del><strong>abnegating</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>disregarding</em></ins></span> your own <span
class="removed"><del><strong>self interest,</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>self-interest,</em></ins></span> but <span
class="removed"><del><strong>you and</strong></del></span> the <span
class="removed"><del><strong>one who
+uses</strong></del></span> <span class="inserted"><ins><em>interest you
+abandon when you don't copyleft</em></ins></span> your code <span
class="removed"><del><strong>are not the only ones affected by your choice of
which
+free software license to use for</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>is much bigger than</em></ins></span> your <span
class="removed"><del><strong>code.</strong></del></span>
+<span class="inserted"><ins><em>own.</em></ins></span> Someone who uses your
code in a nonfree program is <span class="removed"><del><strong>trying to
deny</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>denying</em></ins></span>
+freedom to others, <span
class="removed"><del><strong>and</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>so</em></ins></span> if you <span
class="removed"><del><strong>let him do it,</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>allow that,</em></ins></span> you're failing to
defend <span class="removed"><del><strong>their</strong></del></span>
+<span class="inserted"><ins><em>those people's</em></ins></span> freedom.
When it comes to defending <span class="removed"><del><strong>the freedom of
others,</strong></del></span> <span class="inserted"><ins><em>everyone's
+freedom,</em></ins></span> to lie down and do nothing is an act of weakness,
not
+humility.
+</p>
+
+<p>
+Releasing your code under <span class="inserted"><ins><em><a
href="/licenses/bsd.html"></em></ins></span> one of the BSD <span
class="removed"><del><strong>licenses,</strong></del></span>
+<span class="inserted"><ins><em>licenses</a>,</em></ins></span> or some
other <span class="inserted"><ins><em>lax,</em></ins></span> permissive <span
class="removed"><del><strong>non-copyleft</strong></del></span> license, is not
doing
+wrong; the program is still free software, and still a contribution to
+our community. But it is weak, and in most cases it is not the best
+way to promote users' freedom to share and change software.
+</p>
+
+<span class="inserted"><ins><em><p>
+Here are specific examples of nonfree versions of free programs
+that have done major harm to the free world.</p>
+
+<ul>
+<li>Those who released LLVM under a non-copyleft
+license <a
href="https://www.anandtech.com/show/5238/nvidia-releases-cuda-41-cuda-goes-llvm-and-open-source-kind-of">enabled
+nVidia to release a high-quality nonfree compiler</a> for its GPUs,
+while keeping its instruction set secret. Thus, we can't write a free
+compiler for that platform without a big reverse engineering job. The
+nonfree adaptation of LLVM is the only compiler for those machines,
+and is likely to remain so.</li>
+
+<li>Intel uses
+<a
href="http://www.tomshardware.com/news/google-removing-minix-management-engine-intel,35876.html">a
+proprietary version of the MINIX system</a>, which is free but not
+copylefted, in the Management Engine back door in its modern
+processors.</li>
+</ul></em></ins></span>
+
+</div><!-- for id="content", starts in the include above -->
+<!--#include virtual="/server/footer.html" -->
+<div id="footer">
+<div class="unprintable">
+
+<p>Please send general FSF & GNU inquiries to
+<a href="mailto:address@hidden"><address@hidden></a>.
+There are also <a href="/contact/">other ways to contact</a>
+the FSF. Broken links and other corrections or suggestions can be sent
+to <a
href="mailto:address@hidden"><address@hidden></a>.</p>
+
+<p><!-- TRANSLATORS: Ignore the original text in this paragraph,
+ replace it with the translation of these two:
+
+ We work hard and do our best to provide accurate, good quality
+ translations. However, we are not exempt from imperfection.
+ Please send your comments and general suggestions in this regard
+ to <a href="mailto:address@hidden">
+ <address@hidden></a>.</p>
+
+ <p>For information on coordinating and submitting translations of
+ our web pages, see <a
+ href="/server/standards/README.translations.html">Translations
+ README</a>. -->
+Please see the <a
+href="/server/standards/README.translations.html">Translations
+README</a> for information on coordinating and submitting translations
+of this article.</p>
+</div>
+
+<!-- Regarding copyright, in general, standalone pages (as opposed to
+ files generated as part of manuals) on the GNU web server should
+ be under CC BY-ND <span class="removed"><del><strong>3.0
US.</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>4.0.</em></ins></span> Please do NOT change or
remove this
+ without talking with the webmasters or licensing team first.
+ Please make sure the copyright date is consistent with the
+ document. For web pages, it is ok to list just the latest year the
+ document was modified, or published.
+
+ If you wish to list earlier years, that is ok too.
+ Either "2001, 2002, 2003" or "2001-2003" are ok for specifying
+ years, as long as each year in the range is in fact a copyrightable
+ year, i.e., a year in which the document was published (including
+ being publicly visible on the web or in a revision control system).
+
+ There is more detail about copyright years in the GNU Maintainers
+ Information document, www.gnu.org/prep/maintain. -->
+
+<p>Copyright © 2003, 2007, 2008, <span
class="removed"><del><strong>2013</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>2013, 2017, 2018</em></ins></span> Free Software
Foundation, Inc.</p>
+
+<p>This page is licensed under a <a rel="license"
+<span
class="removed"><del><strong>href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/3.0/us/">Creative</strong></del></span>
+<span
class="inserted"><ins><em>href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/">Creative</em></ins></span>
+Commons <span class="removed"><del><strong>Attribution-NoDerivs 3.0 United
States</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0
International</em></ins></span> License</a>.</p>
+
+<!--#include virtual="/server/bottom-notes.html" -->
+
+<p class="unprintable">Updated:
+<!-- timestamp start -->
+$Date: 2018/02/09 10:03:51 $
+<!-- timestamp end -->
+</p>
+</div>
+</div>
+</body>
+</html>
+</pre></body></html>
Index: po/why-copyleft.ml-diff.html
===================================================================
RCS file: po/why-copyleft.ml-diff.html
diff -N po/why-copyleft.ml-diff.html
--- /dev/null 1 Jan 1970 00:00:00 -0000
+++ po/why-copyleft.ml-diff.html 9 Feb 2018 10:03:51 -0000 1.1
@@ -0,0 +1,150 @@
+<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Strict//EN"
+ "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-strict.dtd";>
+<!-- Generated by GNUN -->
+<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"; xml:lang="en" lang="en">
+<head>
+<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8" />
+<title>/philosophy/why-copyleft.html-diff</title>
+<style type="text/css">
+span.removed { background-color: #f22; color: #000; }
+span.inserted { background-color: #2f2; color: #000; }
+</style></head>
+<body><pre>
+<!--#include virtual="/server/header.html" -->
+<!-- Parent-Version: <span
class="removed"><del><strong>1.77</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>1.84</em></ins></span> -->
+<title>Why Copyleft?
+- GNU Project - Free Software Foundation</title>
+<!--#include virtual="/philosophy/po/why-copyleft.translist" -->
+<!--#include virtual="/server/banner.html" -->
+<h2>Why Copyleft?</h2>
+
+<p>
+<cite>“When it comes to defending the freedom of others, to lie
+down and do nothing is an act of weakness, not humility.”</cite>
+</p>
+
+<p>
+In the GNU Project we usually recommend people
+use <a href="/copyleft/copyleft.html">copyleft</a> licenses like
GNU
+GPL, rather than permissive non-copyleft free software licenses. We
+don't argue harshly against the non-copyleft licenses—in fact,
+we occasionally recommend them in special circumstances—but the
+advocates of those licenses show a pattern of arguing harshly against
+the <acronym title="General Public License">GPL</acronym>.
+</p>
+
+<p>
+In one such argument, a person stated that his use of one of the BSD
+licenses was an “act of humility”: “I ask nothing of
+those who use my code, except to credit me.” It is rather a
+stretch to describe a legal demand for credit as
+“humility”, but there is a deeper point to be considered
+here.
+</p>
+
+<p>
+Humility is <span
class="removed"><del><strong>abnegating</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>disregarding</em></ins></span> your own <span
class="removed"><del><strong>self interest,</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>self-interest,</em></ins></span> but <span
class="removed"><del><strong>you and</strong></del></span> the <span
class="removed"><del><strong>one who
+uses</strong></del></span> <span class="inserted"><ins><em>interest you
+abandon when you don't copyleft</em></ins></span> your code <span
class="removed"><del><strong>are not the only ones affected by your choice of
which
+free software license to use for</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>is much bigger than</em></ins></span> your <span
class="removed"><del><strong>code.</strong></del></span>
+<span class="inserted"><ins><em>own.</em></ins></span> Someone who uses your
code in a nonfree program is <span class="removed"><del><strong>trying to
deny</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>denying</em></ins></span>
+freedom to others, <span
class="removed"><del><strong>and</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>so</em></ins></span> if you <span
class="removed"><del><strong>let him do it,</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>allow that,</em></ins></span> you're failing to
defend <span class="removed"><del><strong>their</strong></del></span>
+<span class="inserted"><ins><em>those people's</em></ins></span> freedom.
When it comes to defending <span class="removed"><del><strong>the freedom of
others,</strong></del></span> <span class="inserted"><ins><em>everyone's
+freedom,</em></ins></span> to lie down and do nothing is an act of weakness,
not
+humility.
+</p>
+
+<p>
+Releasing your code under <span class="inserted"><ins><em><a
href="/licenses/bsd.html"></em></ins></span> one of the BSD <span
class="removed"><del><strong>licenses,</strong></del></span>
+<span class="inserted"><ins><em>licenses</a>,</em></ins></span> or some
other <span class="inserted"><ins><em>lax,</em></ins></span> permissive <span
class="removed"><del><strong>non-copyleft</strong></del></span> license, is not
doing
+wrong; the program is still free software, and still a contribution to
+our community. But it is weak, and in most cases it is not the best
+way to promote users' freedom to share and change software.
+</p>
+
+<span class="inserted"><ins><em><p>
+Here are specific examples of nonfree versions of free programs
+that have done major harm to the free world.</p>
+
+<ul>
+<li>Those who released LLVM under a non-copyleft
+license <a
href="https://www.anandtech.com/show/5238/nvidia-releases-cuda-41-cuda-goes-llvm-and-open-source-kind-of">enabled
+nVidia to release a high-quality nonfree compiler</a> for its GPUs,
+while keeping its instruction set secret. Thus, we can't write a free
+compiler for that platform without a big reverse engineering job. The
+nonfree adaptation of LLVM is the only compiler for those machines,
+and is likely to remain so.</li>
+
+<li>Intel uses
+<a
href="http://www.tomshardware.com/news/google-removing-minix-management-engine-intel,35876.html">a
+proprietary version of the MINIX system</a>, which is free but not
+copylefted, in the Management Engine back door in its modern
+processors.</li>
+</ul></em></ins></span>
+
+</div><!-- for id="content", starts in the include above -->
+<!--#include virtual="/server/footer.html" -->
+<div id="footer">
+<div class="unprintable">
+
+<p>Please send general FSF & GNU inquiries to
+<a href="mailto:address@hidden"><address@hidden></a>.
+There are also <a href="/contact/">other ways to contact</a>
+the FSF. Broken links and other corrections or suggestions can be sent
+to <a
href="mailto:address@hidden"><address@hidden></a>.</p>
+
+<p><!-- TRANSLATORS: Ignore the original text in this paragraph,
+ replace it with the translation of these two:
+
+ We work hard and do our best to provide accurate, good quality
+ translations. However, we are not exempt from imperfection.
+ Please send your comments and general suggestions in this regard
+ to <a href="mailto:address@hidden">
+ <address@hidden></a>.</p>
+
+ <p>For information on coordinating and submitting translations of
+ our web pages, see <a
+ href="/server/standards/README.translations.html">Translations
+ README</a>. -->
+Please see the <a
+href="/server/standards/README.translations.html">Translations
+README</a> for information on coordinating and submitting translations
+of this article.</p>
+</div>
+
+<!-- Regarding copyright, in general, standalone pages (as opposed to
+ files generated as part of manuals) on the GNU web server should
+ be under CC BY-ND <span class="removed"><del><strong>3.0
US.</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>4.0.</em></ins></span> Please do NOT change or
remove this
+ without talking with the webmasters or licensing team first.
+ Please make sure the copyright date is consistent with the
+ document. For web pages, it is ok to list just the latest year the
+ document was modified, or published.
+
+ If you wish to list earlier years, that is ok too.
+ Either "2001, 2002, 2003" or "2001-2003" are ok for specifying
+ years, as long as each year in the range is in fact a copyrightable
+ year, i.e., a year in which the document was published (including
+ being publicly visible on the web or in a revision control system).
+
+ There is more detail about copyright years in the GNU Maintainers
+ Information document, www.gnu.org/prep/maintain. -->
+
+<p>Copyright © 2003, 2007, 2008, <span
class="removed"><del><strong>2013</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>2013, 2017, 2018</em></ins></span> Free Software
Foundation, Inc.</p>
+
+<p>This page is licensed under a <a rel="license"
+<span
class="removed"><del><strong>href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/3.0/us/">Creative</strong></del></span>
+<span
class="inserted"><ins><em>href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/">Creative</em></ins></span>
+Commons <span class="removed"><del><strong>Attribution-NoDerivs 3.0 United
States</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0
International</em></ins></span> License</a>.</p>
+
+<!--#include virtual="/server/bottom-notes.html" -->
+
+<p class="unprintable">Updated:
+<!-- timestamp start -->
+$Date: 2018/02/09 10:03:51 $
+<!-- timestamp end -->
+</p>
+</div>
+</div>
+</body>
+</html>
+</pre></body></html>
Index: po/why-copyleft.pl-diff.html
===================================================================
RCS file: po/why-copyleft.pl-diff.html
diff -N po/why-copyleft.pl-diff.html
--- /dev/null 1 Jan 1970 00:00:00 -0000
+++ po/why-copyleft.pl-diff.html 9 Feb 2018 10:03:51 -0000 1.1
@@ -0,0 +1,150 @@
+<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Strict//EN"
+ "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-strict.dtd";>
+<!-- Generated by GNUN -->
+<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"; xml:lang="en" lang="en">
+<head>
+<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8" />
+<title>/philosophy/why-copyleft.html-diff</title>
+<style type="text/css">
+span.removed { background-color: #f22; color: #000; }
+span.inserted { background-color: #2f2; color: #000; }
+</style></head>
+<body><pre>
+<!--#include virtual="/server/header.html" -->
+<!-- Parent-Version: <span
class="removed"><del><strong>1.77</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>1.84</em></ins></span> -->
+<title>Why Copyleft?
+- GNU Project - Free Software Foundation</title>
+<!--#include virtual="/philosophy/po/why-copyleft.translist" -->
+<!--#include virtual="/server/banner.html" -->
+<h2>Why Copyleft?</h2>
+
+<p>
+<cite>“When it comes to defending the freedom of others, to lie
+down and do nothing is an act of weakness, not humility.”</cite>
+</p>
+
+<p>
+In the GNU Project we usually recommend people
+use <a href="/copyleft/copyleft.html">copyleft</a> licenses like
GNU
+GPL, rather than permissive non-copyleft free software licenses. We
+don't argue harshly against the non-copyleft licenses—in fact,
+we occasionally recommend them in special circumstances—but the
+advocates of those licenses show a pattern of arguing harshly against
+the <acronym title="General Public License">GPL</acronym>.
+</p>
+
+<p>
+In one such argument, a person stated that his use of one of the BSD
+licenses was an “act of humility”: “I ask nothing of
+those who use my code, except to credit me.” It is rather a
+stretch to describe a legal demand for credit as
+“humility”, but there is a deeper point to be considered
+here.
+</p>
+
+<p>
+Humility is <span
class="removed"><del><strong>abnegating</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>disregarding</em></ins></span> your own <span
class="removed"><del><strong>self interest,</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>self-interest,</em></ins></span> but <span
class="removed"><del><strong>you and</strong></del></span> the <span
class="removed"><del><strong>one who
+uses</strong></del></span> <span class="inserted"><ins><em>interest you
+abandon when you don't copyleft</em></ins></span> your code <span
class="removed"><del><strong>are not the only ones affected by your choice of
which
+free software license to use for</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>is much bigger than</em></ins></span> your <span
class="removed"><del><strong>code.</strong></del></span>
+<span class="inserted"><ins><em>own.</em></ins></span> Someone who uses your
code in a nonfree program is <span class="removed"><del><strong>trying to
deny</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>denying</em></ins></span>
+freedom to others, <span
class="removed"><del><strong>and</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>so</em></ins></span> if you <span
class="removed"><del><strong>let him do it,</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>allow that,</em></ins></span> you're failing to
defend <span class="removed"><del><strong>their</strong></del></span>
+<span class="inserted"><ins><em>those people's</em></ins></span> freedom.
When it comes to defending <span class="removed"><del><strong>the freedom of
others,</strong></del></span> <span class="inserted"><ins><em>everyone's
+freedom,</em></ins></span> to lie down and do nothing is an act of weakness,
not
+humility.
+</p>
+
+<p>
+Releasing your code under <span class="inserted"><ins><em><a
href="/licenses/bsd.html"></em></ins></span> one of the BSD <span
class="removed"><del><strong>licenses,</strong></del></span>
+<span class="inserted"><ins><em>licenses</a>,</em></ins></span> or some
other <span class="inserted"><ins><em>lax,</em></ins></span> permissive <span
class="removed"><del><strong>non-copyleft</strong></del></span> license, is not
doing
+wrong; the program is still free software, and still a contribution to
+our community. But it is weak, and in most cases it is not the best
+way to promote users' freedom to share and change software.
+</p>
+
+<span class="inserted"><ins><em><p>
+Here are specific examples of nonfree versions of free programs
+that have done major harm to the free world.</p>
+
+<ul>
+<li>Those who released LLVM under a non-copyleft
+license <a
href="https://www.anandtech.com/show/5238/nvidia-releases-cuda-41-cuda-goes-llvm-and-open-source-kind-of">enabled
+nVidia to release a high-quality nonfree compiler</a> for its GPUs,
+while keeping its instruction set secret. Thus, we can't write a free
+compiler for that platform without a big reverse engineering job. The
+nonfree adaptation of LLVM is the only compiler for those machines,
+and is likely to remain so.</li>
+
+<li>Intel uses
+<a
href="http://www.tomshardware.com/news/google-removing-minix-management-engine-intel,35876.html">a
+proprietary version of the MINIX system</a>, which is free but not
+copylefted, in the Management Engine back door in its modern
+processors.</li>
+</ul></em></ins></span>
+
+</div><!-- for id="content", starts in the include above -->
+<!--#include virtual="/server/footer.html" -->
+<div id="footer">
+<div class="unprintable">
+
+<p>Please send general FSF & GNU inquiries to
+<a href="mailto:address@hidden"><address@hidden></a>.
+There are also <a href="/contact/">other ways to contact</a>
+the FSF. Broken links and other corrections or suggestions can be sent
+to <a
href="mailto:address@hidden"><address@hidden></a>.</p>
+
+<p><!-- TRANSLATORS: Ignore the original text in this paragraph,
+ replace it with the translation of these two:
+
+ We work hard and do our best to provide accurate, good quality
+ translations. However, we are not exempt from imperfection.
+ Please send your comments and general suggestions in this regard
+ to <a href="mailto:address@hidden">
+ <address@hidden></a>.</p>
+
+ <p>For information on coordinating and submitting translations of
+ our web pages, see <a
+ href="/server/standards/README.translations.html">Translations
+ README</a>. -->
+Please see the <a
+href="/server/standards/README.translations.html">Translations
+README</a> for information on coordinating and submitting translations
+of this article.</p>
+</div>
+
+<!-- Regarding copyright, in general, standalone pages (as opposed to
+ files generated as part of manuals) on the GNU web server should
+ be under CC BY-ND <span class="removed"><del><strong>3.0
US.</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>4.0.</em></ins></span> Please do NOT change or
remove this
+ without talking with the webmasters or licensing team first.
+ Please make sure the copyright date is consistent with the
+ document. For web pages, it is ok to list just the latest year the
+ document was modified, or published.
+
+ If you wish to list earlier years, that is ok too.
+ Either "2001, 2002, 2003" or "2001-2003" are ok for specifying
+ years, as long as each year in the range is in fact a copyrightable
+ year, i.e., a year in which the document was published (including
+ being publicly visible on the web or in a revision control system).
+
+ There is more detail about copyright years in the GNU Maintainers
+ Information document, www.gnu.org/prep/maintain. -->
+
+<p>Copyright © 2003, 2007, 2008, <span
class="removed"><del><strong>2013</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>2013, 2017, 2018</em></ins></span> Free Software
Foundation, Inc.</p>
+
+<p>This page is licensed under a <a rel="license"
+<span
class="removed"><del><strong>href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/3.0/us/">Creative</strong></del></span>
+<span
class="inserted"><ins><em>href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/">Creative</em></ins></span>
+Commons <span class="removed"><del><strong>Attribution-NoDerivs 3.0 United
States</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0
International</em></ins></span> License</a>.</p>
+
+<!--#include virtual="/server/bottom-notes.html" -->
+
+<p class="unprintable">Updated:
+<!-- timestamp start -->
+$Date: 2018/02/09 10:03:51 $
+<!-- timestamp end -->
+</p>
+</div>
+</div>
+</body>
+</html>
+</pre></body></html>
Index: po/why-copyleft.pt-br-diff.html
===================================================================
RCS file: po/why-copyleft.pt-br-diff.html
diff -N po/why-copyleft.pt-br-diff.html
--- /dev/null 1 Jan 1970 00:00:00 -0000
+++ po/why-copyleft.pt-br-diff.html 9 Feb 2018 10:03:51 -0000 1.1
@@ -0,0 +1,150 @@
+<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Strict//EN"
+ "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-strict.dtd";>
+<!-- Generated by GNUN -->
+<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"; xml:lang="en" lang="en">
+<head>
+<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8" />
+<title>/philosophy/why-copyleft.html-diff</title>
+<style type="text/css">
+span.removed { background-color: #f22; color: #000; }
+span.inserted { background-color: #2f2; color: #000; }
+</style></head>
+<body><pre>
+<!--#include virtual="/server/header.html" -->
+<!-- Parent-Version: <span
class="removed"><del><strong>1.77</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>1.84</em></ins></span> -->
+<title>Why Copyleft?
+- GNU Project - Free Software Foundation</title>
+<!--#include virtual="/philosophy/po/why-copyleft.translist" -->
+<!--#include virtual="/server/banner.html" -->
+<h2>Why Copyleft?</h2>
+
+<p>
+<cite>“When it comes to defending the freedom of others, to lie
+down and do nothing is an act of weakness, not humility.”</cite>
+</p>
+
+<p>
+In the GNU Project we usually recommend people
+use <a href="/copyleft/copyleft.html">copyleft</a> licenses like
GNU
+GPL, rather than permissive non-copyleft free software licenses. We
+don't argue harshly against the non-copyleft licenses—in fact,
+we occasionally recommend them in special circumstances—but the
+advocates of those licenses show a pattern of arguing harshly against
+the <acronym title="General Public License">GPL</acronym>.
+</p>
+
+<p>
+In one such argument, a person stated that his use of one of the BSD
+licenses was an “act of humility”: “I ask nothing of
+those who use my code, except to credit me.” It is rather a
+stretch to describe a legal demand for credit as
+“humility”, but there is a deeper point to be considered
+here.
+</p>
+
+<p>
+Humility is <span
class="removed"><del><strong>abnegating</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>disregarding</em></ins></span> your own <span
class="removed"><del><strong>self interest,</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>self-interest,</em></ins></span> but <span
class="removed"><del><strong>you and</strong></del></span> the <span
class="removed"><del><strong>one who
+uses</strong></del></span> <span class="inserted"><ins><em>interest you
+abandon when you don't copyleft</em></ins></span> your code <span
class="removed"><del><strong>are not the only ones affected by your choice of
which
+free software license to use for</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>is much bigger than</em></ins></span> your <span
class="removed"><del><strong>code.</strong></del></span>
+<span class="inserted"><ins><em>own.</em></ins></span> Someone who uses your
code in a nonfree program is <span class="removed"><del><strong>trying to
deny</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>denying</em></ins></span>
+freedom to others, <span
class="removed"><del><strong>and</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>so</em></ins></span> if you <span
class="removed"><del><strong>let him do it,</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>allow that,</em></ins></span> you're failing to
defend <span class="removed"><del><strong>their</strong></del></span>
+<span class="inserted"><ins><em>those people's</em></ins></span> freedom.
When it comes to defending <span class="removed"><del><strong>the freedom of
others,</strong></del></span> <span class="inserted"><ins><em>everyone's
+freedom,</em></ins></span> to lie down and do nothing is an act of weakness,
not
+humility.
+</p>
+
+<p>
+Releasing your code under <span class="inserted"><ins><em><a
href="/licenses/bsd.html"></em></ins></span> one of the BSD <span
class="removed"><del><strong>licenses,</strong></del></span>
+<span class="inserted"><ins><em>licenses</a>,</em></ins></span> or some
other <span class="inserted"><ins><em>lax,</em></ins></span> permissive <span
class="removed"><del><strong>non-copyleft</strong></del></span> license, is not
doing
+wrong; the program is still free software, and still a contribution to
+our community. But it is weak, and in most cases it is not the best
+way to promote users' freedom to share and change software.
+</p>
+
+<span class="inserted"><ins><em><p>
+Here are specific examples of nonfree versions of free programs
+that have done major harm to the free world.</p>
+
+<ul>
+<li>Those who released LLVM under a non-copyleft
+license <a
href="https://www.anandtech.com/show/5238/nvidia-releases-cuda-41-cuda-goes-llvm-and-open-source-kind-of">enabled
+nVidia to release a high-quality nonfree compiler</a> for its GPUs,
+while keeping its instruction set secret. Thus, we can't write a free
+compiler for that platform without a big reverse engineering job. The
+nonfree adaptation of LLVM is the only compiler for those machines,
+and is likely to remain so.</li>
+
+<li>Intel uses
+<a
href="http://www.tomshardware.com/news/google-removing-minix-management-engine-intel,35876.html">a
+proprietary version of the MINIX system</a>, which is free but not
+copylefted, in the Management Engine back door in its modern
+processors.</li>
+</ul></em></ins></span>
+
+</div><!-- for id="content", starts in the include above -->
+<!--#include virtual="/server/footer.html" -->
+<div id="footer">
+<div class="unprintable">
+
+<p>Please send general FSF & GNU inquiries to
+<a href="mailto:address@hidden"><address@hidden></a>.
+There are also <a href="/contact/">other ways to contact</a>
+the FSF. Broken links and other corrections or suggestions can be sent
+to <a
href="mailto:address@hidden"><address@hidden></a>.</p>
+
+<p><!-- TRANSLATORS: Ignore the original text in this paragraph,
+ replace it with the translation of these two:
+
+ We work hard and do our best to provide accurate, good quality
+ translations. However, we are not exempt from imperfection.
+ Please send your comments and general suggestions in this regard
+ to <a href="mailto:address@hidden">
+ <address@hidden></a>.</p>
+
+ <p>For information on coordinating and submitting translations of
+ our web pages, see <a
+ href="/server/standards/README.translations.html">Translations
+ README</a>. -->
+Please see the <a
+href="/server/standards/README.translations.html">Translations
+README</a> for information on coordinating and submitting translations
+of this article.</p>
+</div>
+
+<!-- Regarding copyright, in general, standalone pages (as opposed to
+ files generated as part of manuals) on the GNU web server should
+ be under CC BY-ND <span class="removed"><del><strong>3.0
US.</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>4.0.</em></ins></span> Please do NOT change or
remove this
+ without talking with the webmasters or licensing team first.
+ Please make sure the copyright date is consistent with the
+ document. For web pages, it is ok to list just the latest year the
+ document was modified, or published.
+
+ If you wish to list earlier years, that is ok too.
+ Either "2001, 2002, 2003" or "2001-2003" are ok for specifying
+ years, as long as each year in the range is in fact a copyrightable
+ year, i.e., a year in which the document was published (including
+ being publicly visible on the web or in a revision control system).
+
+ There is more detail about copyright years in the GNU Maintainers
+ Information document, www.gnu.org/prep/maintain. -->
+
+<p>Copyright © 2003, 2007, 2008, <span
class="removed"><del><strong>2013</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>2013, 2017, 2018</em></ins></span> Free Software
Foundation, Inc.</p>
+
+<p>This page is licensed under a <a rel="license"
+<span
class="removed"><del><strong>href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/3.0/us/">Creative</strong></del></span>
+<span
class="inserted"><ins><em>href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/">Creative</em></ins></span>
+Commons <span class="removed"><del><strong>Attribution-NoDerivs 3.0 United
States</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0
International</em></ins></span> License</a>.</p>
+
+<!--#include virtual="/server/bottom-notes.html" -->
+
+<p class="unprintable">Updated:
+<!-- timestamp start -->
+$Date: 2018/02/09 10:03:51 $
+<!-- timestamp end -->
+</p>
+</div>
+</div>
+</body>
+</html>
+</pre></body></html>
Index: po/why-copyleft.tr-diff.html
===================================================================
RCS file: po/why-copyleft.tr-diff.html
diff -N po/why-copyleft.tr-diff.html
--- /dev/null 1 Jan 1970 00:00:00 -0000
+++ po/why-copyleft.tr-diff.html 9 Feb 2018 10:03:51 -0000 1.1
@@ -0,0 +1,150 @@
+<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Strict//EN"
+ "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-strict.dtd";>
+<!-- Generated by GNUN -->
+<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"; xml:lang="en" lang="en">
+<head>
+<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8" />
+<title>/philosophy/why-copyleft.html-diff</title>
+<style type="text/css">
+span.removed { background-color: #f22; color: #000; }
+span.inserted { background-color: #2f2; color: #000; }
+</style></head>
+<body><pre>
+<!--#include virtual="/server/header.html" -->
+<!-- Parent-Version: <span
class="removed"><del><strong>1.77</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>1.84</em></ins></span> -->
+<title>Why Copyleft?
+- GNU Project - Free Software Foundation</title>
+<!--#include virtual="/philosophy/po/why-copyleft.translist" -->
+<!--#include virtual="/server/banner.html" -->
+<h2>Why Copyleft?</h2>
+
+<p>
+<cite>“When it comes to defending the freedom of others, to lie
+down and do nothing is an act of weakness, not humility.”</cite>
+</p>
+
+<p>
+In the GNU Project we usually recommend people
+use <a href="/copyleft/copyleft.html">copyleft</a> licenses like
GNU
+GPL, rather than permissive non-copyleft free software licenses. We
+don't argue harshly against the non-copyleft licenses—in fact,
+we occasionally recommend them in special circumstances—but the
+advocates of those licenses show a pattern of arguing harshly against
+the <acronym title="General Public License">GPL</acronym>.
+</p>
+
+<p>
+In one such argument, a person stated that his use of one of the BSD
+licenses was an “act of humility”: “I ask nothing of
+those who use my code, except to credit me.” It is rather a
+stretch to describe a legal demand for credit as
+“humility”, but there is a deeper point to be considered
+here.
+</p>
+
+<p>
+Humility is <span
class="removed"><del><strong>abnegating</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>disregarding</em></ins></span> your own <span
class="removed"><del><strong>self interest,</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>self-interest,</em></ins></span> but <span
class="removed"><del><strong>you and</strong></del></span> the <span
class="removed"><del><strong>one who
+uses</strong></del></span> <span class="inserted"><ins><em>interest you
+abandon when you don't copyleft</em></ins></span> your code <span
class="removed"><del><strong>are not the only ones affected by your choice of
which
+free software license to use for</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>is much bigger than</em></ins></span> your <span
class="removed"><del><strong>code.</strong></del></span>
+<span class="inserted"><ins><em>own.</em></ins></span> Someone who uses your
code in a nonfree program is <span class="removed"><del><strong>trying to
deny</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>denying</em></ins></span>
+freedom to others, <span
class="removed"><del><strong>and</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>so</em></ins></span> if you <span
class="removed"><del><strong>let him do it,</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>allow that,</em></ins></span> you're failing to
defend <span class="removed"><del><strong>their</strong></del></span>
+<span class="inserted"><ins><em>those people's</em></ins></span> freedom.
When it comes to defending <span class="removed"><del><strong>the freedom of
others,</strong></del></span> <span class="inserted"><ins><em>everyone's
+freedom,</em></ins></span> to lie down and do nothing is an act of weakness,
not
+humility.
+</p>
+
+<p>
+Releasing your code under <span class="inserted"><ins><em><a
href="/licenses/bsd.html"></em></ins></span> one of the BSD <span
class="removed"><del><strong>licenses,</strong></del></span>
+<span class="inserted"><ins><em>licenses</a>,</em></ins></span> or some
other <span class="inserted"><ins><em>lax,</em></ins></span> permissive <span
class="removed"><del><strong>non-copyleft</strong></del></span> license, is not
doing
+wrong; the program is still free software, and still a contribution to
+our community. But it is weak, and in most cases it is not the best
+way to promote users' freedom to share and change software.
+</p>
+
+<span class="inserted"><ins><em><p>
+Here are specific examples of nonfree versions of free programs
+that have done major harm to the free world.</p>
+
+<ul>
+<li>Those who released LLVM under a non-copyleft
+license <a
href="https://www.anandtech.com/show/5238/nvidia-releases-cuda-41-cuda-goes-llvm-and-open-source-kind-of">enabled
+nVidia to release a high-quality nonfree compiler</a> for its GPUs,
+while keeping its instruction set secret. Thus, we can't write a free
+compiler for that platform without a big reverse engineering job. The
+nonfree adaptation of LLVM is the only compiler for those machines,
+and is likely to remain so.</li>
+
+<li>Intel uses
+<a
href="http://www.tomshardware.com/news/google-removing-minix-management-engine-intel,35876.html">a
+proprietary version of the MINIX system</a>, which is free but not
+copylefted, in the Management Engine back door in its modern
+processors.</li>
+</ul></em></ins></span>
+
+</div><!-- for id="content", starts in the include above -->
+<!--#include virtual="/server/footer.html" -->
+<div id="footer">
+<div class="unprintable">
+
+<p>Please send general FSF & GNU inquiries to
+<a href="mailto:address@hidden"><address@hidden></a>.
+There are also <a href="/contact/">other ways to contact</a>
+the FSF. Broken links and other corrections or suggestions can be sent
+to <a
href="mailto:address@hidden"><address@hidden></a>.</p>
+
+<p><!-- TRANSLATORS: Ignore the original text in this paragraph,
+ replace it with the translation of these two:
+
+ We work hard and do our best to provide accurate, good quality
+ translations. However, we are not exempt from imperfection.
+ Please send your comments and general suggestions in this regard
+ to <a href="mailto:address@hidden">
+ <address@hidden></a>.</p>
+
+ <p>For information on coordinating and submitting translations of
+ our web pages, see <a
+ href="/server/standards/README.translations.html">Translations
+ README</a>. -->
+Please see the <a
+href="/server/standards/README.translations.html">Translations
+README</a> for information on coordinating and submitting translations
+of this article.</p>
+</div>
+
+<!-- Regarding copyright, in general, standalone pages (as opposed to
+ files generated as part of manuals) on the GNU web server should
+ be under CC BY-ND <span class="removed"><del><strong>3.0
US.</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>4.0.</em></ins></span> Please do NOT change or
remove this
+ without talking with the webmasters or licensing team first.
+ Please make sure the copyright date is consistent with the
+ document. For web pages, it is ok to list just the latest year the
+ document was modified, or published.
+
+ If you wish to list earlier years, that is ok too.
+ Either "2001, 2002, 2003" or "2001-2003" are ok for specifying
+ years, as long as each year in the range is in fact a copyrightable
+ year, i.e., a year in which the document was published (including
+ being publicly visible on the web or in a revision control system).
+
+ There is more detail about copyright years in the GNU Maintainers
+ Information document, www.gnu.org/prep/maintain. -->
+
+<p>Copyright © 2003, 2007, 2008, <span
class="removed"><del><strong>2013</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>2013, 2017, 2018</em></ins></span> Free Software
Foundation, Inc.</p>
+
+<p>This page is licensed under a <a rel="license"
+<span
class="removed"><del><strong>href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/3.0/us/">Creative</strong></del></span>
+<span
class="inserted"><ins><em>href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/">Creative</em></ins></span>
+Commons <span class="removed"><del><strong>Attribution-NoDerivs 3.0 United
States</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0
International</em></ins></span> License</a>.</p>
+
+<!--#include virtual="/server/bottom-notes.html" -->
+
+<p class="unprintable">Updated:
+<!-- timestamp start -->
+$Date: 2018/02/09 10:03:51 $
+<!-- timestamp end -->
+</p>
+</div>
+</div>
+</body>
+</html>
+</pre></body></html>
| [Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread] |
- www/philosophy why-copyleft.ar.html why-copylef...,
GNUN <=