www-commits
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

www/licenses license-list.html


From: Richard M. Stallman
Subject: www/licenses license-list.html
Date: Mon, 16 Oct 2017 14:50:47 -0400 (EDT)

CVSROOT:        /web/www
Module name:    www
Changes by:     Richard M. Stallman <rms>       17/10/16 14:50:47

Modified files:
        licenses       : license-list.html 

Log message:
        (WxWindows Library License): Added
        (EPL2): Added.

CVSWeb URLs:
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/licenses/license-list.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.477&r2=1.478

Patches:
Index: license-list.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/licenses/license-list.html,v
retrieving revision 1.477
retrieving revision 1.478
diff -u -b -r1.477 -r1.478
--- license-list.html   26 Aug 2017 06:30:36 -0000      1.477
+++ license-list.html   16 Oct 2017 18:50:47 -0000      1.478
@@ -962,18 +962,23 @@
 license for one, we recommend the Apache 2.0 license since it protects
 users from patent treachery.</p></dd>
 
-<dt><a id="Wx"></a>WxWidgets License <span class="anchor-reference-id">(<a 
href="#Wx">#Wx</a>)</span></dt>
+<dt><a id="Wx"></a>WxWidgets Library License <span 
class="anchor-reference-id">(<a href="#Wx">#Wx</a>)</span></dt>
 <dd>
 <p>The WxWidgets license is a GPL-compatible free software license. It
-consists of the  <a href="/licenses/old-licenses/lgpl-2.0.html">LGPL 2.0</a> 
-or any later version, plus an additional permission allowing binary
-distributions that use the library to be licensed under terms of the
-distributor's choice (including proprietary). Like the LGPL it is a
-weak copyleft license, so we recommend it <a
-href="/licenses/why-not-lgpl.html"> only in special
+consists of the <a href="/licenses/old-licenses/lgpl-2.0.html">GNU
+Lesser GPL 2.0</a> or any later version, plus an additional permission
+allowing binary distributions that use the library to be licensed
+under terms of the distributor's choice (including proprietary).  It
+is a weak copyleft, even weaker than the LGPL, so we recommend
+it <a href="/licenses/why-not-lgpl.html"> only in special
 circumstances</a>.</p>
 </dd>
 
+<dt><a id="Wxwind"></a>WxWindows Library License <span 
class="anchor-reference-id">(<a href="#Wxwind">#Wx</a>)</span></dt>
+<dd>
+<p>An older name for the <a href="#Wx">WxWidgets Library license</a>.</p>
+</dd>
+
 <dt><a id="X11License" href="http://directory.fsf.org/wiki/License:X11";>
     X11 License</a>
     <span class="anchor-reference-id">
@@ -1240,6 +1245,22 @@
 infringement suits specifically against Contributors to the EPL'd
 program.</p></dd>
 
+<dt><a id="EPL2" href="http://directory.fsf.org/wiki/License:EPLv2.0";>
+    Eclipse Public License Version 2.0</a>
+    <span class="anchor-reference-id">(<a href="#EPL">#EPL</a>)</span></dt>
+<dd>
+<p>In terms of GPL compatibility, the Eclipse Public License version
+2.0 is essentially equivalent to version 1.0. The only change is that
+it explicitly offers the option of designating the GNU GPL version 2
+or later as a &ldquo;secondary license&rdquo; for a certain piece of
+code.</p>
+
+<p>If an initial contributor releases a specific piece of code and
+designates GNU GPL version 2 or later as a secondary license, that
+provides explicit compatibility with those GPL versions for that
+code. (Doing so is roughly equivalent, for users, to releasing that
+piece of code under a dual license, EPL | GPL.) However, the EPL2
+without this designation remains incompatible with the GPL.</p>
 
 <dt><a id="EUPL" href="http://directory.fsf.org/wiki/License:EUPLv1.1";>
     European Union Public License (EUPL) version 1.1</a>
@@ -2698,7 +2719,7 @@
 
 <p class="unprintable">Updated:
 <!-- timestamp start -->
-$Date: 2017/08/26 06:30:36 $
+$Date: 2017/10/16 18:50:47 $
 <!-- timestamp end -->
 </p>
 </div>



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]