[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
www/distros common-distros.pt-br.html po/common...
|
From: |
GNUN |
|
Subject: |
www/distros common-distros.pt-br.html po/common... |
|
Date: |
Thu, 31 Aug 2017 05:29:54 -0400 (EDT) |
CVSROOT: /web/www
Module name: www
Changes by: GNUN <gnun> 17/08/31 05:29:54
Modified files:
distros : common-distros.pt-br.html
distros/po : common-distros.pt-br-diff.html
Log message:
Automatic update by GNUnited Nations.
CVSWeb URLs:
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/distros/common-distros.pt-br.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.23&r2=1.24
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/distros/po/common-distros.pt-br-diff.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.26&r2=1.27
Patches:
Index: common-distros.pt-br.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/distros/common-distros.pt-br.html,v
retrieving revision 1.23
retrieving revision 1.24
diff -u -b -r1.23 -r1.24
--- common-distros.pt-br.html 1 Jun 2017 09:01:30 -0000 1.23
+++ common-distros.pt-br.html 31 Aug 2017 09:29:54 -0000 1.24
@@ -1,4 +1,9 @@
-<!--#set var="ENGLISH_PAGE" value="/distros/common-distros.en.html" -->
+<!--#set var="PO_FILE"
+ value='<a href="/distros/po/common-distros.pt-br.po">
+ https://www.gnu.org/distros/po/common-distros.pt-br.po</a>'
+ --><!--#set var="ORIGINAL_FILE" value="/distros/common-distros.html"
+ --><!--#set var="DIFF_FILE" value="/distros/po/common-distros.pt-br-diff.html"
+ --><!--#set var="OUTDATED_SINCE" value="2017-07-02" --><!--#set
var="ENGLISH_PAGE" value="/distros/common-distros.en.html" -->
<!--#include virtual="/server/header.pt-br.html" -->
<!-- Parent-Version: 1.79 -->
@@ -12,6 +17,7 @@
<!--#include virtual="/distros/po/common-distros.translist" -->
<!--#include virtual="/server/banner.pt-br.html" -->
+<!--#include virtual="/server/outdated.pt-br.html" -->
<h2>Explicando Por Que Não Apoiamos Outros Sistemas</h2>
<!--#include virtual="/licenses/fsf-licensing.pt-br.html" -->
@@ -347,7 +353,7 @@
<p class="unprintable"><!-- timestamp start -->
Ãltima atualização:
-$Date: 2017/06/01 09:01:30 $
+$Date: 2017/08/31 09:29:54 $
<!-- timestamp end -->
</p>
Index: po/common-distros.pt-br-diff.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/distros/po/common-distros.pt-br-diff.html,v
retrieving revision 1.26
retrieving revision 1.27
diff -u -b -r1.26 -r1.27
--- po/common-distros.pt-br-diff.html 18 Nov 2016 07:32:10 -0000 1.26
+++ po/common-distros.pt-br-diff.html 31 Aug 2017 09:29:54 -0000 1.27
@@ -11,7 +11,7 @@
</style></head>
<body><pre>
<!--#include virtual="/server/header.html" -->
-<!-- Parent-Version: <span
class="removed"><del><strong>1.75</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>1.79</em></ins></span> -->
+<!-- Parent-Version: <span
class="removed"><del><strong>1.79</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>1.83</em></ins></span> -->
<title>Explaining Why We Don't Endorse Other Systems - GNU Project -
Free Software Foundation</title>
<link rel="alternate" title="Free GNU/Linux distributions"
href="http://www.gnu.org/distros/distros.rss";
@@ -19,7 +19,7 @@
<!--#include virtual="/distros/po/common-distros.translist" -->
<!--#include virtual="/server/banner.html" -->
<h2>Explaining Why We Don't Endorse Other Systems</h2>
-<span class="inserted"><ins><em><!--#include
virtual="/licenses/fsf-licensing.html" --></em></ins></span>
+<!--#include virtual="/licenses/fsf-licensing.html" -->
<p>We're often asked why we don't endorse a particular
system—usually a popular GNU/Linux distribution. The short
@@ -98,8 +98,8 @@
repository of nonfree software. According to the project, this
software is “not part of the Debian system,” but the
repository is hosted on many of the project's main servers, and people
-can readily <span class="removed"><del><strong>learn
about</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>find</em></ins></span> these nonfree packages by
browsing Debian's
-online package <span
class="removed"><del><strong>database.</p></strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>database and its wiki.</p></em></ins></span>
+can readily find these nonfree packages by browsing Debian's
+online package database and its wiki.</p>
<p>There is also a “contrib” repository; its packages are
free, but some of them exist to load separately distributed
@@ -113,6 +113,9 @@
the problem partly remains: the installer in some cases recommends
these nonfree firmware files for the peripherals on the machine.</p>
+<p>Debian's wiki includes pages about installing nonfree
firmware.</p>
+<!-- https://wiki.debian.org/ATIProprietary -->
+
<h3 id="Fedora">Fedora</h3>
<p>Fedora does have a clear policy about what can be included in the
@@ -124,8 +127,8 @@
<h3 id="Gentoo">Gentoo GNU/Linux</h3>
-<p>Gentoo <span class="removed"><del><strong>makes it easy to
install</strong></del></span> <span class="inserted"><ins><em>includes
installation recipes for</em></ins></span> a number of nonfree
-programs <span class="removed"><del><strong>through</strong></del></span>
<span class="inserted"><ins><em>in</em></ins></span> its primary package
system.</p>
+<p>Gentoo includes installation recipes for a number of nonfree
+programs in its primary package system.</p>
<h3 id="Mandriva">Mandriva GNU/Linux</h3>
@@ -138,16 +141,16 @@
<p>Mandriva also provides nonfree software through dedicated
repositories.</p>
-<h3 <span
class="removed"><del><strong>id="openSUSE">openSUSE</strong></del></span>
<span class="inserted"><ins><em>id="Mint">Mint</em></ins></span>
GNU/Linux</h3>
+<h3 id="Mint">Mint GNU/Linux</h3>
-<span class="inserted"><ins><em><p>Mint does not have a policy against
including nonfree software, it
+<p>Mint does not have a policy against including nonfree software, it
includes nonfree binary blobs in drivers packaged with the kernel, and
it includes nonfree programs in its repositories. It even includes
proprietary codecs.</p>
-<h3 id="openSUSE">openSUSE</h3></em></ins></span>
+<h3 id="openSUSE">openSUSE</h3>
-<p>openSUSE offers <span class="removed"><del><strong>its users access
to</strong></del></span> a repository of nonfree software. This is an
+<p>openSUSE offers a repository of nonfree software. This is an
instance of
how <a href="/philosophy/open-source-misses-the-point.html">
“open” is weaker than “free”</a>.</p>
@@ -165,11 +168,10 @@
<p>Slackware has the two usual problems: there's no clear policy about
what software can be included, and nonfree blobs are included in
Linux, the kernel. It also ships with the nonfree image-viewing
-program xv. Of course, with no firm policy <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>against them, more nonfree
-programs could get</em></ins></span> in <span
class="removed"><del><strong>place, there might be
-other</strong></del></span> <span class="inserted"><ins><em>at any time.
There is an
-<a href="http://freeslack.net/">unofficial list</a>
of</em></ins></span> nonfree software <span
class="removed"><del><strong>included that we
missed.</p></strong></del></span>
-<span class="inserted"><ins><em>in Slackware.</p>
+program xv. Of course, with no firm policy against them, more nonfree
+programs could get in at any time. There is an
+<a href="http://freeslack.net/">unofficial list</a> of nonfree
software
+in Slackware.</p>
<h3 id="SteamOS">SteamOS</h3>
@@ -179,19 +181,19 @@
href="https://www.defectivebydesign.org/what_is_drm">Digital
Restrictions Management (DRM)</a> to impose restrictions on the
software it distributes, as well as on the proprietary software it
-promotes via the Steam store.</p></em></ins></span>
+promotes via the Steam store.</p>
-<h3 id="SUSE">SUSE <span
class="removed"><del><strong>GNU/Linux</h3></strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>GNU/Linux Enterprise</h3></em></ins></span>
+<h3 id="SUSE">SUSE GNU/Linux Enterprise</h3>
<p>In addition to the usual two problems, several nonfree software
programs are available for download from SUSE's official FTP site.</p>
-<h3 <span class="inserted"><ins><em>id="Tails">Tails</h3>
+<h3 id="Tails">Tails</h3>
<p>Tails uses the vanilla version of Linux, which contains nonfree
firmware blobs.</p>
-<h3</em></ins></span> id="Ubuntu">Ubuntu GNU/Linux</h3>
+<h3 id="Ubuntu">Ubuntu GNU/Linux</h3>
<p>Ubuntu provides specific repositories of nonfree software, and
Canonical expressly promotes and recommends nonfree software under the
@@ -200,51 +202,33 @@
option to install nonfree packages too. In addition, the version of
Linux, the kernel, included in Ubuntu contains firmware blobs.</p>
-<span class="removed"><del><strong><p>
-Ubuntu's trademark policy prohibits</strong></del></span>
-
-<span class="inserted"><ins><em><p>The “Ubuntu Software
Center” lists proprietary programs
+<p>The “Ubuntu Software Center” lists proprietary programs
and free programs jumbled together. It
is <a
href="http://www.freesoftwaremagazine.com/articles/ubuntu_software_center_proprietary_and_free_software_mixed_confusing_ui">hard
to tell which ones are free</a> since proprietary programs for
download at no charge are labelled “free”.</p>
<p>Ubuntu <a
href="http://www.ubuntu.com/legal/terms-and-policies/intellectual-property-policy#your-use-of-ubuntu">appears
-to permit</em></ins></span> commercial redistribution of exact copies <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>with the
-trademarks</a>; removal</em></ins></span> of <span
class="removed"><del><strong>Ubuntu, denying</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>the trademarks is required only for
-modified versions. That is</em></ins></span> an <span
class="removed"><del><strong>important freedom.
-</p>
-
-<p>
-As of October 2012, Ubuntu
-<a
href="http://www.omgubuntu.co.uk/2012/10/does-ubuntus-amazon-lens-break-eu-law">
-sends personal data about users' searches</a> to</strong></del></span>
<span class="inserted"><ins><em>acceptable policy for trademarks. The
-same page, further down, makes</em></ins></span> a <span
class="removed"><del><strong>server belonging to
-Canonical, which sends back ads</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>vague and ominous statement about
-“Ubuntu patents,” without giving enough details</em></ins></span>
to <span class="removed"><del><strong>buy things from Amazon. This does
-not, strictly speaking, affect</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>show</em></ins></span>
-whether <span class="removed"><del><strong>Ubuntu is free software, but it
-is a violation of users' privacy. It also encourages buying from
-Amazon, a company</strong></del></span> <span class="inserted"><ins><em>that
constitutes aggression or not.</p>
+to permit commercial redistribution of exact copies with the
+trademarks</a>; removal of the trademarks is required only for
+modified versions. That is an acceptable policy for trademarks. The
+same page, further down, makes a vague and ominous statement about
+“Ubuntu patents,” without giving enough details to show
+whether that constitutes aggression or not.</p>
<p>That page spreads confusion by using the misleading
-term</em></ins></span> <a <span
class="removed"><del><strong>href="http://DefectiveByDesign.org/">associated
-with DRM</a> as well as mistreatment of workers,
authors</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>href="/philosophy/not-ipr.html">“intellectual
property
-rights”</a>, which falsely presumes that trademark
law</em></ins></span> and <span
class="removed"><del><strong>publishers.</p>
-
-<p>This adware is</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>patent law
-and several other laws belong in</em></ins></span> one <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>single conceptual framework. Use</em></ins></span>
-of <span class="removed"><del><strong>the rare occasions in which a free
software
-developer persists in keeping</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>that term is harmful, without exception, so after
making</em></ins></span> a <span class="removed"><del><strong>malicious feature
in its version</strong></del></span>
-<span class="inserted"><ins><em>reference to someone else's
use</em></ins></span> of <span class="inserted"><ins><em>the term, we should
always reject
-it. However, that is not a substantive issue about Ubuntu
as</em></ins></span> a
-<span class="removed"><del><strong>program.</p></strong></del></span>
-<span class="inserted"><ins><em>GNU/Linux
distribution.</p></em></ins></span>
+term <a href="/philosophy/not-ipr.html">“intellectual property
+rights”</a>, which falsely presumes that trademark law and patent
law
+and several other laws belong in one single conceptual framework. Use
+of that term is harmful, without exception, so after making a
+reference to someone else's use of the term, we should always reject
+it. However, that is not a substantive issue about Ubuntu as a
+GNU/Linux distribution.</p>
<h2>Some Other Distros</h2>
-<p>Here we discuss some <span
class="removed"><del><strong>systems</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>well-known or significant non-GNU/Linux system
-distros</em></ins></span> that <span
class="removed"><del><strong>are</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>do</em></ins></span> not <span
class="removed"><del><strong>GNU/Linux.</p></strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>qualify as free.</p></em></ins></span>
+<p>Here we discuss some well-known or significant non-GNU/Linux system
+distros that do not qualify as free.</p>
<h3 id="BSD">BSD systems</h3>
@@ -269,32 +253,33 @@
<p>Haiku includes some software that you're not allowed to modify. It
also includes nonfree firmware blobs.</p>
-<h3 <span class="inserted"><ins><em>id="Android">Android</h3>
+<h3 id="Android">Android</h3>
<p><a
href="/philosophy/android-and-users-freedom.html">Android</a> as
released by Google contains many nonfree parts as well as many free
parts. Most of the free parts are covered by a pushover license (not
-<a href="/copyleft/copyleft.html">copyleft</a>), so manufacturers
that
+<a <span
class="removed"><del><strong>href="/copyleft/copyleft.html">copyleft</a>),</strong></del></span>
<span
class="inserted"><ins><em>href="/licenses/copyleft.html">copyleft</a>),</em></ins></span>
so manufacturers that
distribute Android in a product sometimes make those parts nonfree as
well.</p>
-<h3</em></ins></span> id="CyanogenMod">CyanogenMod</h3>
+<h3 <span
class="removed"><del><strong>id="CyanogenMod">CyanogenMod</h3>
-<p>This modified version of Android contains nonfree libraries.
-It also explains how to install the nonfree applications that Google
-distributes with Android.</p>
+<p>This</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>id="LineageOS">LineageOS</h3>
-<span class="inserted"><ins><em><h3 id="ReactOS">ReactOS</h3>
+<p>LineageOS (formerly CyanogenMod) is a</em></ins></span> modified
version of <span class="removed"><del><strong>Android</strong></del></span>
<span class="inserted"><ins><em>Android,
+which</em></ins></span> contains nonfree libraries. It also explains how to
install the
+nonfree applications that Google distributes with Android.</p>
+
+<h3 id="ReactOS">ReactOS</h3>
<p>ReactOS is meant as a free binary compatible replacement for
-Windows. Allowing people to continue using the proprietary software
-and drivers meant for Windows is one of the stated goals of the
-project. </p></em></ins></span>
+Windows. Use with proprietary software and drivers meant for Windows
+is one of the stated goals of the project.</p>
</div><!-- for id="content", starts in the include above -->
<!--#include virtual="/server/footer.html" -->
<div id="footer">
-<span class="inserted"><ins><em><div
class="unprintable"></em></ins></span>
+<div class="unprintable">
<p>Please send general FSF & GNU inquiries to
<a href="mailto:address@hidden"><address@hidden></a>.
@@ -319,11 +304,11 @@
href="/server/standards/README.translations.html">Translations
README</a> for information on coordinating and submitting translations
of this article.</p>
-<span class="inserted"><ins><em></div></em></ins></span>
+</div>
<!-- Regarding copyright, in general, standalone pages (as opposed to
files generated as part of manuals) on the GNU web server should
- be under CC BY-ND <span class="removed"><del><strong>3.0
US.</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>4.0.</em></ins></span> Please do NOT change or
remove this
+ be under CC BY-ND 4.0. Please do NOT change or remove this
without talking with the webmasters or licensing team first.
Please make sure the copyright date is consistent with the
document. For web pages, it is ok to list just the latest year the
@@ -338,20 +323,17 @@
There is more detail about copyright years in the GNU Maintainers
Information document, www.gnu.org/prep/maintain. -->
-<p>Copyright © <span
class="removed"><del><strong>2011</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>2014, 2015, 2016</em></ins></span> Free Software
Foundation, Inc.</p>
+<p>Copyright © 2014, 2015, 2016, 2017 Free Software Foundation,
Inc.</p>
<p>This page is licensed under a <a rel="license"
-<span
class="removed"><del><strong>href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/3.0/us/">Creative</strong></del></span>
-<span
class="inserted"><ins><em>href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/">Creative</em></ins></span>
-Commons <span class="removed"><del><strong>Attribution-NoDerivs 3.0 United
States</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0
International</em></ins></span> License</a>.</p>
+href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/">Creative
+Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
License</a>.</p>
<!--#include virtual="/server/bottom-notes.html" -->
-<span class="removed"><del><strong><p>Updated:</strong></del></span>
-
-<span class="inserted"><ins><em><p
class="unprintable">Updated:</em></ins></span>
+<p class="unprintable">Updated:
<!-- timestamp start -->
-$Date: 2016/11/18 07:32:10 $
+$Date: 2017/08/31 09:29:54 $
<!-- timestamp end -->
</p>
</div>
| [Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread] |
- www/distros common-distros.pt-br.html po/common...,
GNUN <=