www-commits
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

www/philosophy government-free-software.ja.html...


From: GNUN
Subject: www/philosophy government-free-software.ja.html...
Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2017 08:29:17 -0400 (EDT)

CVSROOT:        /web/www
Module name:    www
Changes by:     GNUN <gnun>     17/08/24 08:29:17

Modified files:
        philosophy     : government-free-software.ja.html 
                         microsoft.ar.html microsoft.ca.html 
                         microsoft.hr.html microsoft.pl.html 
                         whats-wrong-with-youtube.ja.html 
                         why-audio-format-matters.pl.html 
        philosophy/po  : microsoft.ca-diff.html 
                         why-audio-format-matters.pl-diff.html 
Added files:
        philosophy/po  : government-free-software.ja-diff.html 
                         microsoft.ar-diff.html microsoft.hr-diff.html 
                         microsoft.pl-diff.html 
                         whats-wrong-with-youtube.ja-diff.html 

Log message:
        Automatic update by GNUnited Nations.

CVSWeb URLs:
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/government-free-software.ja.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.5&r2=1.6
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/microsoft.ar.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.22&r2=1.23
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/microsoft.ca.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.35&r2=1.36
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/microsoft.hr.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.8&r2=1.9
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/microsoft.pl.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.44&r2=1.45
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/whats-wrong-with-youtube.ja.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.7&r2=1.8
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/why-audio-format-matters.pl.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.25&r2=1.26
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/po/microsoft.ca-diff.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.5&r2=1.6
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/po/why-audio-format-matters.pl-diff.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.1&r2=1.2
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/po/government-free-software.ja-diff.html?cvsroot=www&rev=1.1
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/po/microsoft.ar-diff.html?cvsroot=www&rev=1.1
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/po/microsoft.hr-diff.html?cvsroot=www&rev=1.1
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/po/microsoft.pl-diff.html?cvsroot=www&rev=1.1
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/po/whats-wrong-with-youtube.ja-diff.html?cvsroot=www&rev=1.1

Patches:
Index: government-free-software.ja.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/government-free-software.ja.html,v
retrieving revision 1.5
retrieving revision 1.6
diff -u -b -r1.5 -r1.6
--- government-free-software.ja.html    18 Nov 2016 07:32:45 -0000      1.5
+++ government-free-software.ja.html    24 Aug 2017 12:29:16 -0000      1.6
@@ -1,4 +1,9 @@
-<!--#set var="ENGLISH_PAGE" 
value="/philosophy/government-free-software.en.html" -->
+<!--#set var="PO_FILE"
+ value='<a href="/philosophy/po/government-free-software.ja.po">
+ https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/po/government-free-software.ja.po</a>'
+ --><!--#set var="ORIGINAL_FILE" 
value="/philosophy/government-free-software.html"
+ --><!--#set var="DIFF_FILE" 
value="/philosophy/po/government-free-software.ja-diff.html"
+ --><!--#set var="OUTDATED_SINCE" value="2017-06-25" --><!--#set 
var="ENGLISH_PAGE" value="/philosophy/government-free-software.en.html" -->
 
 <!--#include virtual="/server/header.ja.html" -->
 <!-- Parent-Version: 1.79 -->
@@ -8,6 +13,7 @@
 
 <!--#include virtual="/philosophy/po/government-free-software.translist" -->
 <!--#include virtual="/server/banner.ja.html" -->
+<!--#include virtual="/server/outdated.ja.html" -->
 
<h2>政府が自由ソフトウェアを奨励するために使える方策</h2>
 
 <p><a 
href="http://www.stallman.org/";><strong>リチャード・ストールマン</strong></a>著</p>
@@ -167,7 +173,7 @@
 <p class="unprintable"><!-- timestamp start -->
 最終更新:
 
-$Date: 2016/11/18 07:32:45 $
+$Date: 2017/08/24 12:29:16 $
 
 <!-- timestamp end -->
 </p>

Index: microsoft.ar.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/microsoft.ar.html,v
retrieving revision 1.22
retrieving revision 1.23
diff -u -b -r1.22 -r1.23
--- microsoft.ar.html   8 Nov 2014 22:00:12 -0000       1.22
+++ microsoft.ar.html   24 Aug 2017 12:29:16 -0000      1.23
@@ -1,4 +1,9 @@
-<!--#set var="ENGLISH_PAGE" value="/philosophy/microsoft.en.html" -->
+<!--#set var="PO_FILE"
+ value='<a href="/philosophy/po/microsoft.ar.po">
+ https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/po/microsoft.ar.po</a>'
+ --><!--#set var="ORIGINAL_FILE" value="/philosophy/microsoft.html"
+ --><!--#set var="DIFF_FILE" value="/philosophy/po/microsoft.ar-diff.html"
+ --><!--#set var="OUTDATED_SINCE" value="2017-06-25" --><!--#set 
var="ENGLISH_PAGE" value="/philosophy/microsoft.en.html" -->
 
 <!--#include virtual="/server/header.ar.html" -->
 <!-- Parent-Version: 1.77 -->
@@ -8,6 +13,7 @@
 
 <!--#include virtual="/philosophy/po/microsoft.translist" -->
 <!--#include virtual="/server/banner.ar.html" -->
+<!--#include virtual="/server/outdated.ar.html" -->
 <h2>هل مايكروسوفت الشيطان الأعظم؟</h2>
 
 <div class="announcement">
@@ -155,7 +161,7 @@
 <p class="unprintable"><!-- timestamp start -->
 حُدّثت:
 
-$Date: 2014/11/08 22:00:12 $
+$Date: 2017/08/24 12:29:16 $
 
 <!-- timestamp end -->
 </p>

Index: microsoft.ca.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/microsoft.ca.html,v
retrieving revision 1.35
retrieving revision 1.36
diff -u -b -r1.35 -r1.36
--- microsoft.ca.html   11 Jul 2016 08:35:14 -0000      1.35
+++ microsoft.ca.html   24 Aug 2017 12:29:16 -0000      1.36
@@ -1,4 +1,9 @@
-<!--#set var="ENGLISH_PAGE" value="/philosophy/microsoft.en.html" -->
+<!--#set var="PO_FILE"
+ value='<a href="/philosophy/po/microsoft.ca.po">
+ https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/po/microsoft.ca.po</a>'
+ --><!--#set var="ORIGINAL_FILE" value="/philosophy/microsoft.html"
+ --><!--#set var="DIFF_FILE" value="/philosophy/po/microsoft.ca-diff.html"
+ --><!--#set var="OUTDATED_SINCE" value="2017-06-25" --><!--#set 
var="ENGLISH_PAGE" value="/philosophy/microsoft.en.html" -->
 
 <!--#include virtual="/server/header.ca.html" -->
 <!-- Parent-Version: 1.77 -->
@@ -8,6 +13,7 @@
 
 <!--#include virtual="/philosophy/po/microsoft.translist" -->
 <!--#include virtual="/server/banner.ca.html" -->
+<!--#include virtual="/server/outdated.ca.html" -->
 <h2>És Microsoft el Papu?</h2>
 
 <div class="announcement">
@@ -172,7 +178,7 @@
 <p class="unprintable"><!-- timestamp start -->
 Updated:
 
-$Date: 2016/07/11 08:35:14 $
+$Date: 2017/08/24 12:29:16 $
 
 <!-- timestamp end -->
 </p>

Index: microsoft.hr.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/microsoft.hr.html,v
retrieving revision 1.8
retrieving revision 1.9
diff -u -b -r1.8 -r1.9
--- microsoft.hr.html   23 May 2015 05:09:16 -0000      1.8
+++ microsoft.hr.html   24 Aug 2017 12:29:16 -0000      1.9
@@ -1,4 +1,9 @@
-<!--#set var="ENGLISH_PAGE" value="/philosophy/microsoft.en.html" -->
+<!--#set var="PO_FILE"
+ value='<a href="/philosophy/po/microsoft.hr.po">
+ https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/po/microsoft.hr.po</a>'
+ --><!--#set var="ORIGINAL_FILE" value="/philosophy/microsoft.html"
+ --><!--#set var="DIFF_FILE" value="/philosophy/po/microsoft.hr-diff.html"
+ --><!--#set var="OUTDATED_SINCE" value="2017-06-25" --><!--#set 
var="ENGLISH_PAGE" value="/philosophy/microsoft.en.html" -->
 
 <!--#include virtual="/server/header.hr.html" -->
 <!-- Parent-Version: 1.77 -->
@@ -8,6 +13,7 @@
 
 <!--#include virtual="/philosophy/po/microsoft.translist" -->
 <!--#include virtual="/server/banner.hr.html" -->
+<!--#include virtual="/server/outdated.hr.html" -->
 <h2>Je li Microsoft glavni vrag?</h2>
 
 <div class="announcement">
@@ -166,7 +172,7 @@
 <p class="unprintable"><!-- timestamp start -->
 Vrijeme zadnje izmjene:
 
-$Date: 2015/05/23 05:09:16 $
+$Date: 2017/08/24 12:29:16 $
 
 <!-- timestamp end -->
 </p>

Index: microsoft.pl.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/microsoft.pl.html,v
retrieving revision 1.44
retrieving revision 1.45
diff -u -b -r1.44 -r1.45
--- microsoft.pl.html   16 Jan 2016 00:05:00 -0000      1.44
+++ microsoft.pl.html   24 Aug 2017 12:29:16 -0000      1.45
@@ -1,4 +1,9 @@
-<!--#set var="ENGLISH_PAGE" value="/philosophy/microsoft.en.html" -->
+<!--#set var="PO_FILE"
+ value='<a href="/philosophy/po/microsoft.pl.po">
+ https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/po/microsoft.pl.po</a>'
+ --><!--#set var="ORIGINAL_FILE" value="/philosophy/microsoft.html"
+ --><!--#set var="DIFF_FILE" value="/philosophy/po/microsoft.pl-diff.html"
+ --><!--#set var="OUTDATED_SINCE" value="2017-06-25" --><!--#set 
var="ENGLISH_PAGE" value="/philosophy/microsoft.en.html" -->
 
 <!--#include virtual="/server/header.pl.html" -->
 <!-- Parent-Version: 1.77 -->
@@ -9,6 +14,7 @@
 
 <!--#include virtual="/philosophy/po/microsoft.translist" -->
 <!--#include virtual="/server/banner.pl.html" -->
+<!--#include virtual="/server/outdated.pl.html" -->
 <h2>Czy&nbsp;Microsoft jest Wielkim Szatanem?</h2>
 
 <div class="announcement">
@@ -188,7 +194,7 @@
 <p class="unprintable"><!-- timestamp start -->
 Aktualizowane:
 
-$Date: 2016/01/16 00:05:00 $
+$Date: 2017/08/24 12:29:16 $
 
 <!-- timestamp end -->
 </p>

Index: whats-wrong-with-youtube.ja.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/whats-wrong-with-youtube.ja.html,v
retrieving revision 1.7
retrieving revision 1.8
diff -u -b -r1.7 -r1.8
--- whats-wrong-with-youtube.ja.html    4 Jan 2017 02:28:47 -0000       1.7
+++ whats-wrong-with-youtube.ja.html    24 Aug 2017 12:29:16 -0000      1.8
@@ -1,4 +1,9 @@
-<!--#set var="ENGLISH_PAGE" 
value="/philosophy/whats-wrong-with-youtube.en.html" -->
+<!--#set var="PO_FILE"
+ value='<a href="/philosophy/po/whats-wrong-with-youtube.ja.po">
+ https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/po/whats-wrong-with-youtube.ja.po</a>'
+ --><!--#set var="ORIGINAL_FILE" 
value="/philosophy/whats-wrong-with-youtube.html"
+ --><!--#set var="DIFF_FILE" 
value="/philosophy/po/whats-wrong-with-youtube.ja-diff.html"
+ --><!--#set var="OUTDATED_SINCE" value="2017-06-25" --><!--#set 
var="ENGLISH_PAGE" value="/philosophy/whats-wrong-with-youtube.en.html" -->
 
 <!--#include virtual="/server/header.ja.html" -->
 <!-- Parent-Version: 1.79 -->
@@ -8,6 +13,7 @@
 
 <!--#include virtual="/philosophy/po/whats-wrong-with-youtube.translist" -->
 <!--#include virtual="/server/banner.ja.html" -->
+<!--#include virtual="/server/outdated.ja.html" -->
 <h2>YouTubeの何が間違いか</h2>
 
 <p>わたくしの講演の動画のサイト<a
@@ -110,7 +116,7 @@
 <p class="unprintable"><!-- timestamp start -->
 最終更新:
 
-$Date: 2017/01/04 02:28:47 $
+$Date: 2017/08/24 12:29:16 $
 
 <!-- timestamp end -->
 </p>

Index: why-audio-format-matters.pl.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/why-audio-format-matters.pl.html,v
retrieving revision 1.25
retrieving revision 1.26
diff -u -b -r1.25 -r1.26
--- why-audio-format-matters.pl.html    16 Jan 2016 00:05:03 -0000      1.25
+++ why-audio-format-matters.pl.html    24 Aug 2017 12:29:16 -0000      1.26
@@ -1,4 +1,9 @@
-<!--#set var="ENGLISH_PAGE" 
value="/philosophy/why-audio-format-matters.en.html" -->
+<!--#set var="PO_FILE"
+ value='<a href="/philosophy/po/why-audio-format-matters.pl.po">
+ https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/po/why-audio-format-matters.pl.po</a>'
+ --><!--#set var="ORIGINAL_FILE" 
value="/philosophy/why-audio-format-matters.html"
+ --><!--#set var="DIFF_FILE" 
value="/philosophy/po/why-audio-format-matters.pl-diff.html"
+ --><!--#set var="OUTDATED_SINCE" value="2017-06-25" --><!--#set 
var="ENGLISH_PAGE" value="/philosophy/why-audio-format-matters.en.html" -->
 
 <!--#include virtual="/server/header.pl.html" -->
 <!-- Parent-Version: 1.77 -->
@@ -9,6 +14,7 @@
 
 <!--#include virtual="/philosophy/po/why-audio-format-matters.translist" -->
 <!--#include virtual="/server/banner.pl.html" -->
+<!--#include virtual="/server/outdated.pl.html" -->
 <h2>Dlaczego format pliku dźwiękowego ma znaczenie</h2>
 
 <h3 class="subtitle">Zaproszenie twórców audio do&nbsp;używania formatu Ogg 
Vorbis obok formatu
@@ -219,7 +225,7 @@
 <p class="unprintable"><!-- timestamp start -->
 Aktualizowane:
 
-$Date: 2016/01/16 00:05:03 $
+$Date: 2017/08/24 12:29:16 $
 
 <!-- timestamp end -->
 </p>

Index: po/microsoft.ca-diff.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/po/microsoft.ca-diff.html,v
retrieving revision 1.5
retrieving revision 1.6
diff -u -b -r1.5 -r1.6
--- po/microsoft.ca-diff.html   10 Apr 2013 17:28:58 -0000      1.5
+++ po/microsoft.ca-diff.html   24 Aug 2017 12:29:16 -0000      1.6
@@ -11,11 +11,11 @@
 </style></head>
 <body><pre>
 &lt;!--#include virtual="/server/header.html" --&gt;
-<span class="inserted"><ins><em>&lt;!-- Parent-Version: 1.75 
--&gt;</em></ins></span>
+&lt;!-- Parent-Version: 1.77 --&gt;
 &lt;title&gt;Is Microsoft the Great Satan?
-- GNU Project - Free Software <span class="removed"><del><strong>Foundation 
(FSF)&lt;/title&gt;</strong></del></span> <span 
class="inserted"><ins><em>Foundation&lt;/title&gt;</em></ins></span>
-&lt;!--#include <span 
class="removed"><del><strong>virtual="/server/banner.html"</strong></del></span>
 <span 
class="inserted"><ins><em>virtual="/philosophy/po/microsoft.translist"</em></ins></span>
 --&gt;
-&lt;!--#include <span 
class="removed"><del><strong>virtual="/philosophy/po/microsoft.translist"</strong></del></span>
 <span 
class="inserted"><ins><em>virtual="/server/banner.html"</em></ins></span> --&gt;
+- GNU Project - Free Software Foundation&lt;/title&gt;
+&lt;!--#include virtual="/philosophy/po/microsoft.translist" --&gt;
+&lt;!--#include virtual="/server/banner.html" --&gt;
 &lt;h2&gt;Is Microsoft the Great Satan?&lt;/h2&gt;
 
 &lt;div class="announcement"&gt;
@@ -39,7 +39,7 @@
 
 &lt;p&gt;This is not meant to excuse Microsoft.  Rather, it is meant as a
 reminder that Microsoft is the natural development of a software
-industry based on &lt;a href="/philosophy/shouldbefree.html"&gt;keeping
+industry based on &lt;a <span 
class="removed"><del><strong>href="/philosophy/shouldbefree.html"&gt;keeping</strong></del></span>
 <span 
class="inserted"><ins><em>href="/philosophy/free-software-even-more-important.html"&gt;keeping</em></ins></span>
 users divided and subjugating them&lt;/a&gt;.  When criticizing Microsoft,
 we should not focus so narrowly on Microsoft that we let other
 proprietary software developers off the hook.&lt;/p&gt;
@@ -49,7 +49,7 @@
 protest, of products that are otherwise acceptable.  Rejecting a
 product because it hurts you is not a boycott, just ordinary
 rationality.  To maintain your freedom, you need to
-reject &lt;em&gt;all&lt;/em&gt; proprietary software, regardless of who 
developed
+reject <span class="removed"><del><strong>&lt;em&gt;all&lt;/em&gt; proprietary 
software,</strong></del></span> <span class="inserted"><ins><em>the software 
that takes away freedom,</em></ins></span> regardless of who developed
 it or who distributes it.&lt;/p&gt;
 
 &lt;p&gt;There is no need to reject Microsoft non-software products, or
@@ -58,7 +58,7 @@
 &lt;a href="/philosophy/javascript-trap.html"&gt;non-free JavaScript
 programs&lt;/a&gt; that it may try to slip into your browser.)  When
 Microsoft releases free programs, which it occasionally does, they are
-acceptable in theory; but most of them depend fundamentally on
+acceptable in <span class="removed"><del><strong>theory; 
but</strong></del></span> <span class="inserted"><ins><em>theory.  
Alas,</em></ins></span> most of them depend fundamentally on
 Microsoft proprietary software, which we do need to reject, and that
 makes them useless for anyone that chooses to live in freedom.&lt;/p&gt;
 
@@ -80,7 +80,7 @@
 
 &lt;p&gt;But Microsoft's patents are not the only patents that threaten us
 (and software developers and users generally)&mdash;consider the harm
-that the MP3 patent has done.  Thus, defending against specific
+that the MP3 <span class="removed"><del><strong>patent 
has</strong></del></span> <span class="inserted"><ins><em>patents 
have</em></ins></span> done.  Thus, defending against specific
 attacks is necessary but not sufficient.  The only full solution is
 to &lt;a href="http://endsoftpatents.org/"&gt;eliminate software
 patents&lt;/a&gt;.
@@ -109,21 +109,16 @@
 But we do recognize it as the company that has separated more users
 from their freedom than any other, and a powerful avowed enemy of
 computer users' freedom.  We act accordingly.&lt;/p&gt;
-<span class="removed"><del><strong>&lt;/div&gt;</strong></del></span>
-<span class="inserted"><ins><em>&lt;/div&gt;&lt;!-- for id="content", starts 
in the include above --&gt;</em></ins></span>
+&lt;/div&gt;&lt;!-- for id="content", starts in the include above --&gt;
 &lt;!--#include virtual="/server/footer.html" --&gt;
 &lt;div id="footer"&gt;
+&lt;div class="unprintable"&gt;
 
-&lt;p&gt;Please send <span class="inserted"><ins><em>general</em></ins></span> 
FSF &amp; GNU inquiries to &lt;a
+&lt;p&gt;Please send general FSF &amp; GNU inquiries to &lt;a
 href="mailto:address@hidden"&gt;&lt;address@hidden&gt;&lt;/a&gt;.  There are 
also &lt;a
-href="/contact/"&gt;other ways to contact&lt;/a&gt; the FSF.
-<span class="removed"><del><strong>&lt;br /&gt;
-Please send broken</strong></del></span>  <span 
class="inserted"><ins><em>Broken</em></ins></span> links and other
-corrections or suggestions <span class="inserted"><ins><em>can be 
sent</em></ins></span> to &lt;a <span 
class="removed"><del><strong>href="mailto:address@hidden"&gt;&lt;address@hidden&gt;&lt;/a&gt;.
-&lt;/p&gt;
-
-&lt;p&gt;</strong></del></span>
-<span 
class="inserted"><ins><em>href="mailto:address@hidden"&gt;&lt;address@hidden&gt;&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
+href="/contact/"&gt;other ways to contact&lt;/a&gt; the FSF.  Broken links and 
other
+corrections or suggestions can be sent to &lt;a
+href="mailto:address@hidden"&gt;&lt;address@hidden&gt;&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
 
 &lt;p&gt;&lt;!-- TRANSLATORS: Ignore the original text in this paragraph,
         replace it with the translation of these two:
@@ -137,25 +132,42 @@
         &lt;p&gt;For information on coordinating and submitting translations of
         our web pages, see &lt;a
         href="/server/standards/README.translations.html"&gt;Translations
-        README&lt;/a&gt;. --&gt;</em></ins></span>
+        README&lt;/a&gt;. --&gt;
 Please see the &lt;a
 href="/server/standards/README.translations.html"&gt;Translations 
README&lt;/a&gt; for
-information on coordinating and submitting translations of this <span 
class="removed"><del><strong>article.
-&lt;/p&gt;</strong></del></span> <span 
class="inserted"><ins><em>article.&lt;/p&gt;</em></ins></span>
+information on coordinating and submitting translations of this 
article.&lt;/p&gt;
+&lt;/div&gt;
+
+&lt;!-- Regarding copyright, in general, standalone pages (as opposed to
+     files generated as part of manuals) on the GNU web server should
+     be under CC BY-ND <span class="removed"><del><strong>3.0 
US.</strong></del></span> <span 
class="inserted"><ins><em>4.0.</em></ins></span>  Please do NOT change or 
remove this
+     without talking with the webmasters or licensing team first.
+     Please make sure the copyright date is consistent with the
+     document.  For web pages, it is ok to list just the latest year the
+     document was modified, or published.
+     
+     If you wish to list earlier years, that is ok too.
+     Either "2001, 2002, 2003" or "2001-2003" are ok for specifying
+     years, as long as each year in the range is in fact a copyrightable
+     year, i.e., a year in which the document was published (including
+     being publicly visible on the web or in a revision control system).
 
-&lt;p&gt;
-Copyright &copy; 1997, 1998, 1999, 2000, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010 Free
+     There is more detail about copyright years in the GNU Maintainers
+     Information document, www.gnu.org/prep/maintain. --&gt;
+
+&lt;p&gt;Copyright &copy; 1997, 1998, 1999, 2000, 2007, 2008, 2009, <span 
class="removed"><del><strong>2010</strong></del></span> <span 
class="inserted"><ins><em>2010, 2017</em></ins></span> Free
 Software Foundation, Inc.&lt;/p&gt;
+
 &lt;p&gt;This page is licensed under a &lt;a rel="license"
-href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/3.0/us/"&gt;Creative
-Commons Attribution-NoDerivs 3.0 United States License&lt;/a&gt;.
-&lt;/p&gt;
+<span 
class="removed"><del><strong>href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/3.0/us/"&gt;Creative</strong></del></span>
+<span 
class="inserted"><ins><em>href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/"&gt;Creative</em></ins></span>
+Commons <span class="removed"><del><strong>Attribution-NoDerivs 3.0 United 
States</strong></del></span> <span 
class="inserted"><ins><em>Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 
International</em></ins></span> License&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
 
 &lt;!--#include virtual="/server/bottom-notes.html" --&gt;
 
-&lt;p&gt;Updated:
+&lt;p class="unprintable"&gt;Updated:
 &lt;!-- timestamp start --&gt;
-$Date: 2013/04/10 17:28:58 $
+$Date: 2017/08/24 12:29:16 $
 &lt;!-- timestamp end --&gt;
 &lt;/p&gt;
 &lt;/div&gt;

Index: po/why-audio-format-matters.pl-diff.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/po/why-audio-format-matters.pl-diff.html,v
retrieving revision 1.1
retrieving revision 1.2
diff -u -b -r1.1 -r1.2
--- po/why-audio-format-matters.pl-diff.html    25 Oct 2013 09:01:02 -0000      
1.1
+++ po/why-audio-format-matters.pl-diff.html    24 Aug 2017 12:29:16 -0000      
1.2
@@ -11,32 +11,30 @@
 </style></head>
 <body><pre>
 &lt;!--#include virtual="/server/header.html" --&gt;
-<span class="inserted"><ins><em>&lt;!-- Parent-Version: 1.75 
--&gt;</em></ins></span>
+&lt;!-- Parent-Version: 1.77 --&gt;
 &lt;title&gt;Why Audio Format Matters
-- GNU Project - Free <span class="removed"><del><strong>as in 
Freedom&lt;/title&gt;</strong></del></span> <span 
class="inserted"><ins><em>Software Foundation&lt;/title&gt;</em></ins></span>
+- GNU Project - Free Software Foundation&lt;/title&gt;
 &lt;!--#include virtual="/philosophy/po/why-audio-format-matters.translist" 
--&gt;
 &lt;!--#include virtual="/server/banner.html" --&gt;
 &lt;h2&gt;Why Audio Format Matters&lt;/h2&gt;
 
-<span class="removed"><del><strong>&lt;!-- This document uses XHTML 1.0 
Strict, but may be served as --&gt;
-&lt;!-- text/html.  Please ensure that markup style considers --&gt;
-&lt;!-- appendex C of the XHTML 1.0 standard. See validator.w3.org. --&gt;
-
-&lt;!-- Please ensure links are consistent with Apache's MultiView. --&gt;
-&lt;!-- Change include statements to be consistent with the relevant --&gt;
-&lt;!-- language, where necessary. --&gt;</strong></del></span>
-
 &lt;h3 class="subtitle"&gt;An invitation to audio producers to use Ogg
 Vorbis alongside MP3&lt;/h3&gt;
 
 &lt;p&gt;by Karl Fogel&lt;/p&gt;
 
-&lt;div class="announcement"&gt;&lt;p class="footer"&gt;&lt;a 
href="http://xiph.org/about/"&gt;More information&lt;/a&gt; about Xiph.org (the
+&lt;div class="announcement"&gt;
+&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://xiph.org/about/"&gt;More 
information&lt;/a&gt; about Xiph.org (the
 organization that created Ogg Vorbis) and the importance of free
 distribution formats &lt;a href="http://xiph.org/about/"&gt;is 
available&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
 
 &lt;p&gt;The Free Software Foundation have also produced &lt;a 
href="http://playogg.org"&gt;a user-friendly guide to installing Ogg Vorbis 
support in Microsoft
-Windows and Apple Mac OS X&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
+Windows and Apple Mac OS <span 
class="removed"><del><strong>X&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;</strong></del></span>
 <span class="inserted"><ins><em>X&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
+
+&lt;p&gt;The patents covering MP3 will reportedly all have expired by 2018,
+but similar problems will continue to arise as long as patents are
+permitted to restrict software development.&lt;/p&gt;
+&lt;/blockquote&gt;</em></ins></span>
 &lt;/div&gt;
 
 &lt;p&gt;If you produce audio for general distribution, you probably spend
@@ -148,20 +146,13 @@
 &lt;/div&gt;&lt;!-- for id="content", starts in the include above --&gt;
 &lt;!--#include virtual="/server/footer.html" --&gt;
 &lt;div id="footer"&gt;
+&lt;div class="unprintable"&gt;
 
-<span class="removed"><del><strong>&lt;p&gt;
-Please</strong></del></span>
-
-<span class="inserted"><ins><em>&lt;p&gt;Please</em></ins></span> send <span 
class="inserted"><ins><em>general</em></ins></span> FSF &amp; GNU inquiries to
-&lt;a <span 
class="removed"><del><strong>href="mailto:address@hidden"&gt;&lt;em&gt;address@hidden&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;.</strong></del></span>
 <span 
class="inserted"><ins><em>href="mailto:address@hidden"&gt;&lt;address@hidden&gt;&lt;/a&gt;.</em></ins></span>
+&lt;p&gt;Please send general FSF &amp; GNU inquiries to
+&lt;a href="mailto:address@hidden"&gt;&lt;address@hidden&gt;&lt;/a&gt;.
 There are also &lt;a href="/contact/"&gt;other ways to contact&lt;/a&gt;
-the FSF.
-<span class="removed"><del><strong>&lt;br /&gt;
-Please send broken</strong></del></span>  <span 
class="inserted"><ins><em>Broken</em></ins></span> links and other corrections 
or suggestions <span class="inserted"><ins><em>can be sent</em></ins></span>
-to &lt;a <span 
class="removed"><del><strong>href="mailto:address@hidden"&gt;&lt;em&gt;address@hidden&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;.
-&lt;/p&gt;
-
-&lt;p&gt;</strong></del></span> <span 
class="inserted"><ins><em>href="mailto:address@hidden"&gt;&lt;address@hidden&gt;&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
+the FSF.  Broken links and other corrections or suggestions can be sent
+to &lt;a 
href="mailto:address@hidden"&gt;&lt;address@hidden&gt;&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
 
 &lt;p&gt;&lt;!-- TRANSLATORS: Ignore the original text in this paragraph,
         replace it with the translation of these two:
@@ -175,19 +166,16 @@
         &lt;p&gt;For information on coordinating and submitting translations of
         our web pages, see &lt;a
         href="/server/standards/README.translations.html"&gt;Translations
-        README&lt;/a&gt;. --&gt;</em></ins></span>
+        README&lt;/a&gt;. --&gt;
 Please see the &lt;a
 href="/server/standards/README.translations.html"&gt;Translations
 README&lt;/a&gt; for information on coordinating and submitting translations
-of this <span class="removed"><del><strong>article.
-&lt;/p&gt;
-
-&lt;p&gt;
-Copyright</strong></del></span> <span 
class="inserted"><ins><em>article.&lt;/p&gt;
+of this article.&lt;/p&gt;
+&lt;/div&gt;
 
 &lt;!-- Regarding copyright, in general, standalone pages (as opposed to
      files generated as part of manuals) on the GNU web server should
-     be under CC BY-ND 3.0 US.  Please do NOT change or remove this
+     be under CC BY-ND <span class="removed"><del><strong>3.0 
US.</strong></del></span> <span 
class="inserted"><ins><em>4.0.</em></ins></span>  Please do NOT change or 
remove this
      without talking with the webmasters or licensing team first.
      Please make sure the copyright date is consistent with the
      document.  For web pages, it is ok to list just the latest year the
@@ -202,19 +190,17 @@
      There is more detail about copyright years in the GNU Maintainers
      Information document, www.gnu.org/prep/maintain. --&gt;
 
-&lt;p&gt;Copyright</em></ins></span> &copy; 2007 Karl <span 
class="removed"><del><strong>Fogel
-&lt;/p&gt;</strong></del></span> <span 
class="inserted"><ins><em>Fogel&lt;/p&gt;</em></ins></span>
+&lt;p&gt;Copyright &copy; 2007 Karl Fogel&lt;/p&gt;
 
 &lt;p&gt;Verbatim copying and distribution of this entire article are
 permitted worldwide, without royalty, in any medium, provided this
-notice, and the copyright notice, are <span 
class="removed"><del><strong>preserved.
-&lt;/p&gt;</strong></del></span> <span 
class="inserted"><ins><em>preserved.&lt;/p&gt;</em></ins></span>
+notice, and the copyright notice, are preserved.&lt;/p&gt;
 
 &lt;!--#include virtual="/server/bottom-notes.html" --&gt;
 
-&lt;p&gt;Updated:
+&lt;p class="unprintable"&gt;Updated:
 &lt;!-- timestamp start --&gt;
-$Date: 2013/10/25 09:01:02 $
+$Date: 2017/08/24 12:29:16 $
 &lt;!-- timestamp end --&gt;
 &lt;/p&gt;
 &lt;/div&gt;

Index: po/government-free-software.ja-diff.html
===================================================================
RCS file: po/government-free-software.ja-diff.html
diff -N po/government-free-software.ja-diff.html
--- /dev/null   1 Jan 1970 00:00:00 -0000
+++ po/government-free-software.ja-diff.html    24 Aug 2017 12:29:16 -0000      
1.1
@@ -0,0 +1,288 @@
+<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Strict//EN"
+    "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-strict.dtd";>
+<!-- Generated by GNUN -->
+<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"; xml:lang="en" lang="en">
+<head>
+<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8" />
+<title>/philosophy/government-free-software.html-diff</title>
+<style type="text/css">
+span.removed { background-color: #f22; color: #000; }
+span.inserted { background-color: #2f2; color: #000; }
+</style></head>
+<body><pre>
+&lt;!--#include virtual="/server/header.html" --&gt;
+&lt;!-- Parent-Version: 1.79 --&gt;
+&lt;title&gt;Measures Governments Can Use to Promote Free Software
+- GNU Project - Free Software Foundation&lt;/title&gt;
+&lt;!--#include virtual="/philosophy/po/government-free-software.translist" 
--&gt;
+&lt;!--#include virtual="/server/banner.html" --&gt;
+&lt;h2&gt;Measures Governments Can Use to Promote Free Software&lt;/h2&gt;
+<span class="inserted"><ins><em>&lt;h3&gt;And why it is their duty to do 
so&lt;/h3&gt;</em></ins></span>
+
+&lt;p&gt;by &lt;a href="http://www.stallman.org/"&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Richard
+Stallman&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
+
+&lt;p&gt;This article suggests policies for a strong and firm effort to promote
+free software within the state, and to lead the rest of the country
+towards software freedom.&lt;/p&gt;
+
+&lt;p&gt;The mission of the state is to organize society for the freedom and
+well-being of the people.  One aspect of this mission, in the
+computing field, is to encourage users to adopt free software:
+&lt;a href="/philosophy/free-sw.html"&gt;software that respects the users'
+freedom&lt;/a&gt;.  A proprietary (non-free) program tramples the freedom of
+those that use it; it is a social problem that the state should work
+to eradicate.&lt;/p&gt;
+
+&lt;p&gt;The state needs to insist on free software in its own computing for
+the sake of its computational sovereignty (the state's control over
+its own computing).  All users deserve control over their computing,
+but the state has a responsibility to the people to maintain control
+over the computing it does on their behalf.  Most government
+activities now depend on computing, and its control over those
+activities depends on its control over that computing.  Losing this
+control in an agency whose mission is critical undermines national
+security.&lt;/p&gt;
+
+&lt;p&gt;Moving state agencies to free software can also provide secondary
+benefits, such as saving money and encouraging local software support
+businesses.&lt;/p&gt;
+
+&lt;p&gt;In this text, &ldquo;state entities&rdquo; refers to all levels of 
government, and
+means public agencies including schools, public-private partnerships,
+largely state-funded activities such as charter schools, and 
&ldquo;private&rdquo;
+corporations controlled by the state or established with special
+privileges or functions by the state.&lt;/p&gt;
+
+&lt;h3&gt;Education&lt;/h3&gt;
+&lt;p&gt;The most important policy concerns education, since that shapes
+the future of the country:&lt;/p&gt;
+
+&lt;ul&gt;
+&lt;li&gt;&lt;b&gt;Teach only free software&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
+Educational activities, or at least those of state entities, must
+teach only free software (thus, they should never lead students to use
+a nonfree program), and should teach the civic reasons for insisting
+on free software.  To teach a nonfree program is to teach dependence,
+which is contrary to the mission of the school.&lt;/li&gt;
+&lt;/ul&gt;
+
+&lt;h3&gt;The State and the Public&lt;/h3&gt;
+&lt;p&gt;Also crucial are state policies that influence what software
+individuals and organizations use:&lt;/p&gt;
+
+&lt;ul&gt;
+&lt;li&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;Never require nonfree programs&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br 
/&gt;
+Laws and public sector practices must be changed so that they never
+require or pressure individuals or organizations to use a nonfree
+program.  They should also discourage communication and publication
+practices that imply such consequences (including
+&lt;a href="http://www.defectivebydesign.org/what_is_drm"&gt;Digital
+Restrictions Management&lt;/a&gt;).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/li&gt;
+
+&lt;li&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;Distribute only free software&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
+Whenever a state entity distributes software to the public,
+including programs included in or specified by its web pages, it must
+be distributed as free software, and must be capable of running on a
+platform containing exclusively free software.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/li&gt;
+
+&lt;li&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;State web sites&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
+State entity web sites and network services must be designed so
+that users can use them, without disadvantage, by means of free
+software exclusively.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/li&gt;
+
+&lt;li&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;Free formats and protocols&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
+State entities must use only file formats and communication
+protocols that are well supported by free software, preferably with
+published specifications.  (We do not state this in terms of
+&ldquo;standards&rdquo; because it should apply to nonstandardized interfaces 
as
+well as standardized ones.)  For example, they must not distribute
+audio or video recordings in formats that require Flash or nonfree
+codecs, and public libraries must not distribute works with Digital
+Restrictions Management.&lt;/p&gt;
+
+&lt;p&gt;To support the policy of distributing publications and works in
+freedom-respecting formats, the state must insist that all reports
+developed for it be delivered in freedom-respecting 
formats.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/li&gt;
+
+&lt;li&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;Untie computers from licenses&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
+Sale of computers must not require purchase of a proprietary
+software license.  The seller should be required by law to offer the
+purchaser the option of buying the computer without the proprietary
+software and without paying the license fee.&lt;/p&gt;
+&lt;p&gt;The imposed payment is a secondary wrong, and should not distract
+us from the essential injustice of proprietary software, the loss of
+freedom which results from using it.  Nonetheless, the abuse of
+forcing users to pay for it gives certain proprietary software
+developers an additional unfair advantage, detrimental to users'
+freedom.  It is proper for the state to prevent this abuse.&lt;/p&gt;
+&lt;/li&gt;
+&lt;/ul&gt;
+
+&lt;h3&gt;Computational Sovereignty&lt;/h3&gt;
+&lt;p&gt;Several policies affect the computational sovereignty of the state.
+State entities must maintain control over their computing, not cede
+control to private hands.  These points apply to all computers,
+including smartphones.&lt;/p&gt;
+
+&lt;ul&gt;
+&lt;li&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;Migrate to free software&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
+State entities must migrate to free software, and must not install,
+or continue using, any nonfree software except under a temporary
+exception.  Only one agency should have the authority to grant these
+temporary exceptions, and only when shown compelling reasons.  This
+agency's goal should be to reduce the number of exceptions to 
zero.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/li&gt;
+
+&lt;li&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;Develop free IT solutions&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
+When a state entity pays for development of a computing solution, the
+contract must require it be delivered as free software, and that it be
+designed such that one can both run it and develop it on a 100%-free
+environment.  All contracts must require this, so that if the
+developer does not comply with these requirements, the work cannot be
+paid for.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/li&gt;
+
+&lt;li&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;Choose computers for free software&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br 
/&gt;
+When a state entity buys or leases computers, it must choose among
+the models that come closest, in their class, to being capable of
+running without any proprietary software.  The state should maintain,
+for each class of computers, a list of the models authorized based on
+this criterion.  Models available to both the public and the state
+should be preferred to models available only to the state.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/li&gt;
+
+&lt;li&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;Negotiate with manufacturers&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
+The state should negotiate actively with manufacturers to bring
+about the availability in the market (to the state and the public) of
+suitable hardware products, in all pertinent product areas, that
+require no proprietary software.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/li&gt;
+
+&lt;li&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;Unite with other states&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
+The state should invite other states to negotiate collectively with
+manufacturers about suitable hardware products.  Together they will
+have more clout.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/li&gt;
+&lt;/ul&gt;
+
+&lt;h3&gt;Computational Sovereignty II&lt;/h3&gt;
+&lt;p&gt;The computational sovereignty (and security) of the state includes
+control over the computers that do the state's work.  This requires
+avoiding &lt;a href="/philosophy/who-does-that-server-really-serve.html"&gt;
+Service as a Software Substitute&lt;/a&gt;, unless the service is run by a 
state
+agency under the same branch of government, as well as other practices
+that diminish the state control over its computing.  Therefore,&lt;/p&gt;
+
+&lt;ul&gt;
+&lt;li&gt;&lt;b&gt;State must control its computers&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
+Every computer that the state uses must belong to or be leased by
+the same branch of government that uses it, and that branch must not
+cede to outsiders the right to decide who has physical access to the
+computer, who can do maintenance (hardware or software) on it, or
+what software should be installed in it.  If the computer is not
+portable, then while in use it must be in a physical space of which
+the state is the occupant (either as owner or as tenant).&lt;/li&gt;
+&lt;/ul&gt;
+
+&lt;h3&gt;Influence Development&lt;/h3&gt;
+&lt;p&gt;State policy affects free and nonfree software development:&lt;/p&gt;
+
+&lt;ul&gt;
+&lt;li&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;Encourage free&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
+The state should encourage developers to create or enhance free
+software and make it available to the public, e.g. by tax breaks
+and other financial incentive.  Contrariwise, no such incentives
+should be granted for development, distribution or use of nonfree
+software.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/li&gt;
+
+&lt;li&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;Don't encourage nonfree&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
+In particular, proprietary software developers should not be able to
+&ldquo;donate&rdquo; copies to schools and claim a tax write-off for the 
nominal
+value of the software.  Proprietary software is not legitimate in a
+school.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/li&gt;
+&lt;/ul&gt;
+
+&lt;h3&gt;E-waste&lt;/h3&gt;
+&lt;p&gt;Freedom should not imply e-waste:&lt;/p&gt;
+
+&lt;ul&gt;
+&lt;li&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;Replaceable software&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
+Many modern computers are designed to make it impossible to
+replace their preloaded software with free software.  Thus, the only
+way to free them is to junk them.  This practice is harmful to
+society.&lt;/p&gt;
+
+&lt;p&gt;Therefore, it should be illegal, or at least substantially
+discouraged through heavy taxation, to sell, import or distribute in
+quantity a new computer (that is, not second-hand) or computer-based
+product for which secrecy about hardware interfaces or intentional
+restrictions prevent users from developing, installing and using
+replacements for any and all of the installed software that the
+manufacturer could upgrade.  This would apply, in particular, to any
+device on which &lt;a 
href="/proprietary/proprietary-jails.html"&gt;&ldquo;jailbreaking&rdquo;&lt;/a&gt;
 is needed to install a
+different operating system, or in which the interfaces for some
+peripherals are secret.
+&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/li&gt;
+&lt;/ul&gt;
+
+&lt;h3&gt;Technological neutrality&lt;/h3&gt;
+
+&lt;p&gt;With the measures in this article, the state can recover control
+over its computing, and lead the country's citizens, businesses and
+organizations towards control over their computing.  However, some
+object on the grounds that this would violate the
+&ldquo;principle&rdquo; of technological neutrality.&lt;/p&gt;
+
+&lt;p&gt;The idea of technological neutrality is that the state should not
+impose arbitrary preferences on technical choices.  Whether that is a
+valid principle is disputable, but it is limited in any case to issues
+that are merely technical.  The measures advocated here address issues
+of ethical, social and political importance, so they are
+&lt;a href="/philosophy/technological-neutrality.html"&gt;outside the scope
+of &lt;em&gt;technological&lt;/em&gt; neutrality&lt;/a&gt;.  Only those who 
wish to
+subjugate a country would suggest that its government be
+&ldquo;neutral&rdquo; about its sovereignty or its citizens' freedom.&lt;/p&gt;
+
+&lt;/div&gt;&lt;!-- for id="content", starts in the include above --&gt;
+&lt;!--#include virtual="/server/footer.html" --&gt;
+&lt;div id="footer"&gt;
+&lt;div class="unprintable"&gt;
+
+&lt;p&gt;Please send general FSF &amp; GNU inquiries to &lt;a
+href="mailto:address@hidden"&gt;&lt;address@hidden&gt;&lt;/a&gt;.  There are 
also &lt;a
+href="/contact/"&gt;other ways to contact&lt;/a&gt; the FSF.  Broken links and 
other
+corrections or suggestions can be sent to &lt;a
+href="mailto:address@hidden"&gt;&lt;address@hidden&gt;&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
+
+&lt;p&gt;&lt;!-- TRANSLATORS: Ignore the original text in this paragraph,
+        replace it with the translation of these two:
+
+        We work hard and do our best to provide accurate, good quality
+        translations.  However, we are not exempt from imperfection.
+        Please send your comments and general suggestions in this regard
+        to &lt;a href="mailto:address@hidden"&gt;
+        &lt;address@hidden&gt;&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
+
+        &lt;p&gt;For information on coordinating and submitting translations of
+        our web pages, see &lt;a
+        href="/server/standards/README.translations.html"&gt;Translations
+        README&lt;/a&gt;. --&gt;
+Please see the &lt;a
+href="/server/standards/README.translations.html"&gt;Translations 
README&lt;/a&gt; for
+information on coordinating and submitting translations of this 
article.&lt;/p&gt;
+&lt;/div&gt;
+
+&lt;p&gt;Copyright &copy; 2011, 2015, <span 
class="removed"><del><strong>2016</strong></del></span> <span 
class="inserted"><ins><em>2016, 2017</em></ins></span> Free Software 
Foundation, Inc.&lt;/p&gt;
+
+&lt;p&gt;This page is licensed under a &lt;a rel="license"
+href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/"&gt;Creative
+Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International 
License&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
+
+&lt;!--#include virtual="/server/bottom-notes.html" --&gt;
+
+&lt;p class="unprintable"&gt;Updated:
+&lt;!-- timestamp start --&gt;
+$Date: 2017/08/24 12:29:16 $
+&lt;!-- timestamp end --&gt;
+&lt;/p&gt;
+&lt;/div&gt;
+&lt;/div&gt;
+&lt;/body&gt;
+&lt;/html&gt;
+</pre></body></html>

Index: po/microsoft.ar-diff.html
===================================================================
RCS file: po/microsoft.ar-diff.html
diff -N po/microsoft.ar-diff.html
--- /dev/null   1 Jan 1970 00:00:00 -0000
+++ po/microsoft.ar-diff.html   24 Aug 2017 12:29:16 -0000      1.1
@@ -0,0 +1,177 @@
+<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Strict//EN"
+    "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-strict.dtd";>
+<!-- Generated by GNUN -->
+<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"; xml:lang="en" lang="en">
+<head>
+<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8" />
+<title>/philosophy/microsoft.html-diff</title>
+<style type="text/css">
+span.removed { background-color: #f22; color: #000; }
+span.inserted { background-color: #2f2; color: #000; }
+</style></head>
+<body><pre>
+&lt;!--#include virtual="/server/header.html" --&gt;
+&lt;!-- Parent-Version: 1.77 --&gt;
+&lt;title&gt;Is Microsoft the Great Satan?
+- GNU Project - Free Software Foundation&lt;/title&gt;
+&lt;!--#include virtual="/philosophy/po/microsoft.translist" --&gt;
+&lt;!--#include virtual="/server/banner.html" --&gt;
+&lt;h2&gt;Is Microsoft the Great Satan?&lt;/h2&gt;
+
+&lt;div class="announcement"&gt;
+&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;This article was given a major rewrite in 2009.
+The &lt;a href="/philosophy/microsoft-old.html"&gt;old version&lt;/a&gt; is 
also
+available.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
+&lt;/div&gt;
+
+&lt;p&gt;Many people think of Microsoft as the monster menace of the
+software industry.  There is even a specific campaign to boycott
+Microsoft.  This feeling has intensified since Microsoft expressed
+active hostility towards free software.&lt;/p&gt;
+
+&lt;p&gt;In the free software movement, our perspective is different.  We
+see that Microsoft is doing something that mistreats software users:
+making software &lt;a 
href="/philosophy/categories.html#ProprietarySoftware"&gt;
+proprietary&lt;/a&gt; and thus denying users their rightful freedom.  But
+Microsoft is not alone in this; many other companies do the same thing
+to the users.  If other companies manage to dominate fewer users than
+Microsoft, that is not for lack of trying.&lt;/p&gt;
+
+&lt;p&gt;This is not meant to excuse Microsoft.  Rather, it is meant as a
+reminder that Microsoft is the natural development of a software
+industry based on &lt;a <span 
class="removed"><del><strong>href="/philosophy/shouldbefree.html"&gt;keeping</strong></del></span>
 <span 
class="inserted"><ins><em>href="/philosophy/free-software-even-more-important.html"&gt;keeping</em></ins></span>
+users divided and subjugating them&lt;/a&gt;.  When criticizing Microsoft,
+we should not focus so narrowly on Microsoft that we let other
+proprietary software developers off the hook.&lt;/p&gt;
+
+&lt;p&gt;When we reject Microsoft's proprietary software, that is not a
+boycott.  The word &ldquo;boycott&rdquo; means rejection, as a
+protest, of products that are otherwise acceptable.  Rejecting a
+product because it hurts you is not a boycott, just ordinary
+rationality.  To maintain your freedom, you need to
+reject <span class="removed"><del><strong>&lt;em&gt;all&lt;/em&gt; proprietary 
software,</strong></del></span> <span class="inserted"><ins><em>the software 
that takes away freedom,</em></ins></span> regardless of who developed
+it or who distributes it.&lt;/p&gt;
+
+&lt;p&gt;There is no need to reject Microsoft non-software products, or
+services that you can use without proprietary software.  (When you use
+a web service, whether Microsoft's or not, watch out for
+&lt;a href="/philosophy/javascript-trap.html"&gt;non-free JavaScript
+programs&lt;/a&gt; that it may try to slip into your browser.)  When
+Microsoft releases free programs, which it occasionally does, they are
+acceptable in <span class="removed"><del><strong>theory; 
but</strong></del></span> <span class="inserted"><ins><em>theory.  
Alas,</em></ins></span> most of them depend fundamentally on
+Microsoft proprietary software, which we do need to reject, and that
+makes them useless for anyone that chooses to live in freedom.&lt;/p&gt;
+
+&lt;p&gt;In the &ldquo;Halloween documents&rdquo;, leaked in October 1998,
+Microsoft executives stated an intention to use various methods to
+obstruct the development of free software: specifically, designing
+secret protocols and file formats, and patenting algorithms and
+software features.&lt;/p&gt;
+
+&lt;p&gt;These obstructionist policies were not new: Microsoft, and many
+other software companies, had been doing them for years.  Secrecy
+and patents have obstructed us greatly, and they may be more damaging
+in the future.  For the most part, the companies' main motivation in
+doing these things is to attack each other; now, it seems, we are
+specifically targeted.  Microsoft is using its patents directly to
+&lt;a 
href="http://www.redhat.com/about/news/archive/2009/9/microsoft-and-patent-trolls"&gt;
+attack the free software community&lt;/a&gt;, and our community is fighting
+back.&lt;/p&gt;
+
+&lt;p&gt;But Microsoft's patents are not the only patents that threaten us
+(and software developers and users generally)&mdash;consider the harm
+that the MP3 <span class="removed"><del><strong>patent 
has</strong></del></span> <span class="inserted"><ins><em>patents 
have</em></ins></span> done.  Thus, defending against specific
+attacks is necessary but not sufficient.  The only full solution is
+to &lt;a href="http://endsoftpatents.org/"&gt;eliminate software
+patents&lt;/a&gt;.
+&lt;/p&gt;
+
+&lt;p&gt;Other Microsoft practices specifically harmful to the adoption of
+free software are the ones designed to build up social inertia that
+obstructs migration to GNU/Linux.  For instance, when Microsoft
+&ldquo;donates&rdquo; copies of Windows to schools, it converts these
+schools into tools for implanting a dependence on Windows.  There are
+indications that Microsoft systematically plans these
+activities &lt;a href="http://boycottnovell.com/wiki/index.php/EDGI"&gt; as
+a campaign against the adoption of GNU/Linux&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
+
+&lt;p&gt;Each Windows &ldquo;upgrade&rdquo; augments Microsoft's power over
+the users; Microsoft plans it that way.  And each one is a step
+forward in malicious features, which
+include &lt;a href="http://DefectiveByDesign.org"&gt;Digital Restrictions
+Management&lt;/a&gt; and back doors.  So the FSF runs campaigns to warn
+users against &ldquo;upgrading&rdquo;
+to &lt;a href="http://BadVista.org/"&gt;Windows Vista&lt;/a&gt;
+and &lt;a href="http://Windows7Sins.org"&gt;Windows 7&lt;/a&gt;.  We aim to 
reduce
+the amount of inertia they will create.&lt;/p&gt;
+
+&lt;p&gt;We don't hate Microsoft, and we don't consider it the Great Satan.
+But we do recognize it as the company that has separated more users
+from their freedom than any other, and a powerful avowed enemy of
+computer users' freedom.  We act accordingly.&lt;/p&gt;
+&lt;/div&gt;&lt;!-- for id="content", starts in the include above --&gt;
+&lt;!--#include virtual="/server/footer.html" --&gt;
+&lt;div id="footer"&gt;
+&lt;div class="unprintable"&gt;
+
+&lt;p&gt;Please send general FSF &amp; GNU inquiries to &lt;a
+href="mailto:address@hidden"&gt;&lt;address@hidden&gt;&lt;/a&gt;.  There are 
also &lt;a
+href="/contact/"&gt;other ways to contact&lt;/a&gt; the FSF.  Broken links and 
other
+corrections or suggestions can be sent to &lt;a
+href="mailto:address@hidden"&gt;&lt;address@hidden&gt;&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
+
+&lt;p&gt;&lt;!-- TRANSLATORS: Ignore the original text in this paragraph,
+        replace it with the translation of these two:
+
+        We work hard and do our best to provide accurate, good quality
+        translations.  However, we are not exempt from imperfection.
+        Please send your comments and general suggestions in this regard
+        to &lt;a href="mailto:address@hidden"&gt;
+        &lt;address@hidden&gt;&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
+
+        &lt;p&gt;For information on coordinating and submitting translations of
+        our web pages, see &lt;a
+        href="/server/standards/README.translations.html"&gt;Translations
+        README&lt;/a&gt;. --&gt;
+Please see the &lt;a
+href="/server/standards/README.translations.html"&gt;Translations 
README&lt;/a&gt; for
+information on coordinating and submitting translations of this 
article.&lt;/p&gt;
+&lt;/div&gt;
+
+&lt;!-- Regarding copyright, in general, standalone pages (as opposed to
+     files generated as part of manuals) on the GNU web server should
+     be under CC BY-ND <span class="removed"><del><strong>3.0 
US.</strong></del></span> <span 
class="inserted"><ins><em>4.0.</em></ins></span>  Please do NOT change or 
remove this
+     without talking with the webmasters or licensing team first.
+     Please make sure the copyright date is consistent with the
+     document.  For web pages, it is ok to list just the latest year the
+     document was modified, or published.
+     
+     If you wish to list earlier years, that is ok too.
+     Either "2001, 2002, 2003" or "2001-2003" are ok for specifying
+     years, as long as each year in the range is in fact a copyrightable
+     year, i.e., a year in which the document was published (including
+     being publicly visible on the web or in a revision control system).
+     
+     There is more detail about copyright years in the GNU Maintainers
+     Information document, www.gnu.org/prep/maintain. --&gt;
+
+&lt;p&gt;Copyright &copy; 1997, 1998, 1999, 2000, 2007, 2008, 2009, <span 
class="removed"><del><strong>2010</strong></del></span> <span 
class="inserted"><ins><em>2010, 2017</em></ins></span> Free
+Software Foundation, Inc.&lt;/p&gt;
+
+&lt;p&gt;This page is licensed under a &lt;a rel="license"
+<span 
class="removed"><del><strong>href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/3.0/us/"&gt;Creative</strong></del></span>
+<span 
class="inserted"><ins><em>href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/"&gt;Creative</em></ins></span>
+Commons <span class="removed"><del><strong>Attribution-NoDerivs 3.0 United 
States</strong></del></span> <span 
class="inserted"><ins><em>Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 
International</em></ins></span> License&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
+
+&lt;!--#include virtual="/server/bottom-notes.html" --&gt;
+
+&lt;p class="unprintable"&gt;Updated:
+&lt;!-- timestamp start --&gt;
+$Date: 2017/08/24 12:29:16 $
+&lt;!-- timestamp end --&gt;
+&lt;/p&gt;
+&lt;/div&gt;
+&lt;/div&gt;
+&lt;/body&gt;
+&lt;/html&gt;
+</pre></body></html>

Index: po/microsoft.hr-diff.html
===================================================================
RCS file: po/microsoft.hr-diff.html
diff -N po/microsoft.hr-diff.html
--- /dev/null   1 Jan 1970 00:00:00 -0000
+++ po/microsoft.hr-diff.html   24 Aug 2017 12:29:16 -0000      1.1
@@ -0,0 +1,177 @@
+<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Strict//EN"
+    "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-strict.dtd";>
+<!-- Generated by GNUN -->
+<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"; xml:lang="en" lang="en">
+<head>
+<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8" />
+<title>/philosophy/microsoft.html-diff</title>
+<style type="text/css">
+span.removed { background-color: #f22; color: #000; }
+span.inserted { background-color: #2f2; color: #000; }
+</style></head>
+<body><pre>
+&lt;!--#include virtual="/server/header.html" --&gt;
+&lt;!-- Parent-Version: 1.77 --&gt;
+&lt;title&gt;Is Microsoft the Great Satan?
+- GNU Project - Free Software Foundation&lt;/title&gt;
+&lt;!--#include virtual="/philosophy/po/microsoft.translist" --&gt;
+&lt;!--#include virtual="/server/banner.html" --&gt;
+&lt;h2&gt;Is Microsoft the Great Satan?&lt;/h2&gt;
+
+&lt;div class="announcement"&gt;
+&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;This article was given a major rewrite in 2009.
+The &lt;a href="/philosophy/microsoft-old.html"&gt;old version&lt;/a&gt; is 
also
+available.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
+&lt;/div&gt;
+
+&lt;p&gt;Many people think of Microsoft as the monster menace of the
+software industry.  There is even a specific campaign to boycott
+Microsoft.  This feeling has intensified since Microsoft expressed
+active hostility towards free software.&lt;/p&gt;
+
+&lt;p&gt;In the free software movement, our perspective is different.  We
+see that Microsoft is doing something that mistreats software users:
+making software &lt;a 
href="/philosophy/categories.html#ProprietarySoftware"&gt;
+proprietary&lt;/a&gt; and thus denying users their rightful freedom.  But
+Microsoft is not alone in this; many other companies do the same thing
+to the users.  If other companies manage to dominate fewer users than
+Microsoft, that is not for lack of trying.&lt;/p&gt;
+
+&lt;p&gt;This is not meant to excuse Microsoft.  Rather, it is meant as a
+reminder that Microsoft is the natural development of a software
+industry based on &lt;a <span 
class="removed"><del><strong>href="/philosophy/shouldbefree.html"&gt;keeping</strong></del></span>
 <span 
class="inserted"><ins><em>href="/philosophy/free-software-even-more-important.html"&gt;keeping</em></ins></span>
+users divided and subjugating them&lt;/a&gt;.  When criticizing Microsoft,
+we should not focus so narrowly on Microsoft that we let other
+proprietary software developers off the hook.&lt;/p&gt;
+
+&lt;p&gt;When we reject Microsoft's proprietary software, that is not a
+boycott.  The word &ldquo;boycott&rdquo; means rejection, as a
+protest, of products that are otherwise acceptable.  Rejecting a
+product because it hurts you is not a boycott, just ordinary
+rationality.  To maintain your freedom, you need to
+reject <span class="removed"><del><strong>&lt;em&gt;all&lt;/em&gt; proprietary 
software,</strong></del></span> <span class="inserted"><ins><em>the software 
that takes away freedom,</em></ins></span> regardless of who developed
+it or who distributes it.&lt;/p&gt;
+
+&lt;p&gt;There is no need to reject Microsoft non-software products, or
+services that you can use without proprietary software.  (When you use
+a web service, whether Microsoft's or not, watch out for
+&lt;a href="/philosophy/javascript-trap.html"&gt;non-free JavaScript
+programs&lt;/a&gt; that it may try to slip into your browser.)  When
+Microsoft releases free programs, which it occasionally does, they are
+acceptable in <span class="removed"><del><strong>theory; 
but</strong></del></span> <span class="inserted"><ins><em>theory.  
Alas,</em></ins></span> most of them depend fundamentally on
+Microsoft proprietary software, which we do need to reject, and that
+makes them useless for anyone that chooses to live in freedom.&lt;/p&gt;
+
+&lt;p&gt;In the &ldquo;Halloween documents&rdquo;, leaked in October 1998,
+Microsoft executives stated an intention to use various methods to
+obstruct the development of free software: specifically, designing
+secret protocols and file formats, and patenting algorithms and
+software features.&lt;/p&gt;
+
+&lt;p&gt;These obstructionist policies were not new: Microsoft, and many
+other software companies, had been doing them for years.  Secrecy
+and patents have obstructed us greatly, and they may be more damaging
+in the future.  For the most part, the companies' main motivation in
+doing these things is to attack each other; now, it seems, we are
+specifically targeted.  Microsoft is using its patents directly to
+&lt;a 
href="http://www.redhat.com/about/news/archive/2009/9/microsoft-and-patent-trolls"&gt;
+attack the free software community&lt;/a&gt;, and our community is fighting
+back.&lt;/p&gt;
+
+&lt;p&gt;But Microsoft's patents are not the only patents that threaten us
+(and software developers and users generally)&mdash;consider the harm
+that the MP3 <span class="removed"><del><strong>patent 
has</strong></del></span> <span class="inserted"><ins><em>patents 
have</em></ins></span> done.  Thus, defending against specific
+attacks is necessary but not sufficient.  The only full solution is
+to &lt;a href="http://endsoftpatents.org/"&gt;eliminate software
+patents&lt;/a&gt;.
+&lt;/p&gt;
+
+&lt;p&gt;Other Microsoft practices specifically harmful to the adoption of
+free software are the ones designed to build up social inertia that
+obstructs migration to GNU/Linux.  For instance, when Microsoft
+&ldquo;donates&rdquo; copies of Windows to schools, it converts these
+schools into tools for implanting a dependence on Windows.  There are
+indications that Microsoft systematically plans these
+activities &lt;a href="http://boycottnovell.com/wiki/index.php/EDGI"&gt; as
+a campaign against the adoption of GNU/Linux&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
+
+&lt;p&gt;Each Windows &ldquo;upgrade&rdquo; augments Microsoft's power over
+the users; Microsoft plans it that way.  And each one is a step
+forward in malicious features, which
+include &lt;a href="http://DefectiveByDesign.org"&gt;Digital Restrictions
+Management&lt;/a&gt; and back doors.  So the FSF runs campaigns to warn
+users against &ldquo;upgrading&rdquo;
+to &lt;a href="http://BadVista.org/"&gt;Windows Vista&lt;/a&gt;
+and &lt;a href="http://Windows7Sins.org"&gt;Windows 7&lt;/a&gt;.  We aim to 
reduce
+the amount of inertia they will create.&lt;/p&gt;
+
+&lt;p&gt;We don't hate Microsoft, and we don't consider it the Great Satan.
+But we do recognize it as the company that has separated more users
+from their freedom than any other, and a powerful avowed enemy of
+computer users' freedom.  We act accordingly.&lt;/p&gt;
+&lt;/div&gt;&lt;!-- for id="content", starts in the include above --&gt;
+&lt;!--#include virtual="/server/footer.html" --&gt;
+&lt;div id="footer"&gt;
+&lt;div class="unprintable"&gt;
+
+&lt;p&gt;Please send general FSF &amp; GNU inquiries to &lt;a
+href="mailto:address@hidden"&gt;&lt;address@hidden&gt;&lt;/a&gt;.  There are 
also &lt;a
+href="/contact/"&gt;other ways to contact&lt;/a&gt; the FSF.  Broken links and 
other
+corrections or suggestions can be sent to &lt;a
+href="mailto:address@hidden"&gt;&lt;address@hidden&gt;&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
+
+&lt;p&gt;&lt;!-- TRANSLATORS: Ignore the original text in this paragraph,
+        replace it with the translation of these two:
+
+        We work hard and do our best to provide accurate, good quality
+        translations.  However, we are not exempt from imperfection.
+        Please send your comments and general suggestions in this regard
+        to &lt;a href="mailto:address@hidden"&gt;
+        &lt;address@hidden&gt;&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
+
+        &lt;p&gt;For information on coordinating and submitting translations of
+        our web pages, see &lt;a
+        href="/server/standards/README.translations.html"&gt;Translations
+        README&lt;/a&gt;. --&gt;
+Please see the &lt;a
+href="/server/standards/README.translations.html"&gt;Translations 
README&lt;/a&gt; for
+information on coordinating and submitting translations of this 
article.&lt;/p&gt;
+&lt;/div&gt;
+
+&lt;!-- Regarding copyright, in general, standalone pages (as opposed to
+     files generated as part of manuals) on the GNU web server should
+     be under CC BY-ND <span class="removed"><del><strong>3.0 
US.</strong></del></span> <span 
class="inserted"><ins><em>4.0.</em></ins></span>  Please do NOT change or 
remove this
+     without talking with the webmasters or licensing team first.
+     Please make sure the copyright date is consistent with the
+     document.  For web pages, it is ok to list just the latest year the
+     document was modified, or published.
+     
+     If you wish to list earlier years, that is ok too.
+     Either "2001, 2002, 2003" or "2001-2003" are ok for specifying
+     years, as long as each year in the range is in fact a copyrightable
+     year, i.e., a year in which the document was published (including
+     being publicly visible on the web or in a revision control system).
+     
+     There is more detail about copyright years in the GNU Maintainers
+     Information document, www.gnu.org/prep/maintain. --&gt;
+
+&lt;p&gt;Copyright &copy; 1997, 1998, 1999, 2000, 2007, 2008, 2009, <span 
class="removed"><del><strong>2010</strong></del></span> <span 
class="inserted"><ins><em>2010, 2017</em></ins></span> Free
+Software Foundation, Inc.&lt;/p&gt;
+
+&lt;p&gt;This page is licensed under a &lt;a rel="license"
+<span 
class="removed"><del><strong>href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/3.0/us/"&gt;Creative</strong></del></span>
+<span 
class="inserted"><ins><em>href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/"&gt;Creative</em></ins></span>
+Commons <span class="removed"><del><strong>Attribution-NoDerivs 3.0 United 
States</strong></del></span> <span 
class="inserted"><ins><em>Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 
International</em></ins></span> License&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
+
+&lt;!--#include virtual="/server/bottom-notes.html" --&gt;
+
+&lt;p class="unprintable"&gt;Updated:
+&lt;!-- timestamp start --&gt;
+$Date: 2017/08/24 12:29:16 $
+&lt;!-- timestamp end --&gt;
+&lt;/p&gt;
+&lt;/div&gt;
+&lt;/div&gt;
+&lt;/body&gt;
+&lt;/html&gt;
+</pre></body></html>

Index: po/microsoft.pl-diff.html
===================================================================
RCS file: po/microsoft.pl-diff.html
diff -N po/microsoft.pl-diff.html
--- /dev/null   1 Jan 1970 00:00:00 -0000
+++ po/microsoft.pl-diff.html   24 Aug 2017 12:29:16 -0000      1.1
@@ -0,0 +1,177 @@
+<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Strict//EN"
+    "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-strict.dtd";>
+<!-- Generated by GNUN -->
+<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"; xml:lang="en" lang="en">
+<head>
+<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8" />
+<title>/philosophy/microsoft.html-diff</title>
+<style type="text/css">
+span.removed { background-color: #f22; color: #000; }
+span.inserted { background-color: #2f2; color: #000; }
+</style></head>
+<body><pre>
+&lt;!--#include virtual="/server/header.html" --&gt;
+&lt;!-- Parent-Version: 1.77 --&gt;
+&lt;title&gt;Is Microsoft the Great Satan?
+- GNU Project - Free Software Foundation&lt;/title&gt;
+&lt;!--#include virtual="/philosophy/po/microsoft.translist" --&gt;
+&lt;!--#include virtual="/server/banner.html" --&gt;
+&lt;h2&gt;Is Microsoft the Great Satan?&lt;/h2&gt;
+
+&lt;div class="announcement"&gt;
+&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;This article was given a major rewrite in 2009.
+The &lt;a href="/philosophy/microsoft-old.html"&gt;old version&lt;/a&gt; is 
also
+available.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
+&lt;/div&gt;
+
+&lt;p&gt;Many people think of Microsoft as the monster menace of the
+software industry.  There is even a specific campaign to boycott
+Microsoft.  This feeling has intensified since Microsoft expressed
+active hostility towards free software.&lt;/p&gt;
+
+&lt;p&gt;In the free software movement, our perspective is different.  We
+see that Microsoft is doing something that mistreats software users:
+making software &lt;a 
href="/philosophy/categories.html#ProprietarySoftware"&gt;
+proprietary&lt;/a&gt; and thus denying users their rightful freedom.  But
+Microsoft is not alone in this; many other companies do the same thing
+to the users.  If other companies manage to dominate fewer users than
+Microsoft, that is not for lack of trying.&lt;/p&gt;
+
+&lt;p&gt;This is not meant to excuse Microsoft.  Rather, it is meant as a
+reminder that Microsoft is the natural development of a software
+industry based on &lt;a <span 
class="removed"><del><strong>href="/philosophy/shouldbefree.html"&gt;keeping</strong></del></span>
 <span 
class="inserted"><ins><em>href="/philosophy/free-software-even-more-important.html"&gt;keeping</em></ins></span>
+users divided and subjugating them&lt;/a&gt;.  When criticizing Microsoft,
+we should not focus so narrowly on Microsoft that we let other
+proprietary software developers off the hook.&lt;/p&gt;
+
+&lt;p&gt;When we reject Microsoft's proprietary software, that is not a
+boycott.  The word &ldquo;boycott&rdquo; means rejection, as a
+protest, of products that are otherwise acceptable.  Rejecting a
+product because it hurts you is not a boycott, just ordinary
+rationality.  To maintain your freedom, you need to
+reject <span class="removed"><del><strong>&lt;em&gt;all&lt;/em&gt; proprietary 
software,</strong></del></span> <span class="inserted"><ins><em>the software 
that takes away freedom,</em></ins></span> regardless of who developed
+it or who distributes it.&lt;/p&gt;
+
+&lt;p&gt;There is no need to reject Microsoft non-software products, or
+services that you can use without proprietary software.  (When you use
+a web service, whether Microsoft's or not, watch out for
+&lt;a href="/philosophy/javascript-trap.html"&gt;non-free JavaScript
+programs&lt;/a&gt; that it may try to slip into your browser.)  When
+Microsoft releases free programs, which it occasionally does, they are
+acceptable in <span class="removed"><del><strong>theory; 
but</strong></del></span> <span class="inserted"><ins><em>theory.  
Alas,</em></ins></span> most of them depend fundamentally on
+Microsoft proprietary software, which we do need to reject, and that
+makes them useless for anyone that chooses to live in freedom.&lt;/p&gt;
+
+&lt;p&gt;In the &ldquo;Halloween documents&rdquo;, leaked in October 1998,
+Microsoft executives stated an intention to use various methods to
+obstruct the development of free software: specifically, designing
+secret protocols and file formats, and patenting algorithms and
+software features.&lt;/p&gt;
+
+&lt;p&gt;These obstructionist policies were not new: Microsoft, and many
+other software companies, had been doing them for years.  Secrecy
+and patents have obstructed us greatly, and they may be more damaging
+in the future.  For the most part, the companies' main motivation in
+doing these things is to attack each other; now, it seems, we are
+specifically targeted.  Microsoft is using its patents directly to
+&lt;a 
href="http://www.redhat.com/about/news/archive/2009/9/microsoft-and-patent-trolls"&gt;
+attack the free software community&lt;/a&gt;, and our community is fighting
+back.&lt;/p&gt;
+
+&lt;p&gt;But Microsoft's patents are not the only patents that threaten us
+(and software developers and users generally)&mdash;consider the harm
+that the MP3 <span class="removed"><del><strong>patent 
has</strong></del></span> <span class="inserted"><ins><em>patents 
have</em></ins></span> done.  Thus, defending against specific
+attacks is necessary but not sufficient.  The only full solution is
+to &lt;a href="http://endsoftpatents.org/"&gt;eliminate software
+patents&lt;/a&gt;.
+&lt;/p&gt;
+
+&lt;p&gt;Other Microsoft practices specifically harmful to the adoption of
+free software are the ones designed to build up social inertia that
+obstructs migration to GNU/Linux.  For instance, when Microsoft
+&ldquo;donates&rdquo; copies of Windows to schools, it converts these
+schools into tools for implanting a dependence on Windows.  There are
+indications that Microsoft systematically plans these
+activities &lt;a href="http://boycottnovell.com/wiki/index.php/EDGI"&gt; as
+a campaign against the adoption of GNU/Linux&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
+
+&lt;p&gt;Each Windows &ldquo;upgrade&rdquo; augments Microsoft's power over
+the users; Microsoft plans it that way.  And each one is a step
+forward in malicious features, which
+include &lt;a href="http://DefectiveByDesign.org"&gt;Digital Restrictions
+Management&lt;/a&gt; and back doors.  So the FSF runs campaigns to warn
+users against &ldquo;upgrading&rdquo;
+to &lt;a href="http://BadVista.org/"&gt;Windows Vista&lt;/a&gt;
+and &lt;a href="http://Windows7Sins.org"&gt;Windows 7&lt;/a&gt;.  We aim to 
reduce
+the amount of inertia they will create.&lt;/p&gt;
+
+&lt;p&gt;We don't hate Microsoft, and we don't consider it the Great Satan.
+But we do recognize it as the company that has separated more users
+from their freedom than any other, and a powerful avowed enemy of
+computer users' freedom.  We act accordingly.&lt;/p&gt;
+&lt;/div&gt;&lt;!-- for id="content", starts in the include above --&gt;
+&lt;!--#include virtual="/server/footer.html" --&gt;
+&lt;div id="footer"&gt;
+&lt;div class="unprintable"&gt;
+
+&lt;p&gt;Please send general FSF &amp; GNU inquiries to &lt;a
+href="mailto:address@hidden"&gt;&lt;address@hidden&gt;&lt;/a&gt;.  There are 
also &lt;a
+href="/contact/"&gt;other ways to contact&lt;/a&gt; the FSF.  Broken links and 
other
+corrections or suggestions can be sent to &lt;a
+href="mailto:address@hidden"&gt;&lt;address@hidden&gt;&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
+
+&lt;p&gt;&lt;!-- TRANSLATORS: Ignore the original text in this paragraph,
+        replace it with the translation of these two:
+
+        We work hard and do our best to provide accurate, good quality
+        translations.  However, we are not exempt from imperfection.
+        Please send your comments and general suggestions in this regard
+        to &lt;a href="mailto:address@hidden"&gt;
+        &lt;address@hidden&gt;&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
+
+        &lt;p&gt;For information on coordinating and submitting translations of
+        our web pages, see &lt;a
+        href="/server/standards/README.translations.html"&gt;Translations
+        README&lt;/a&gt;. --&gt;
+Please see the &lt;a
+href="/server/standards/README.translations.html"&gt;Translations 
README&lt;/a&gt; for
+information on coordinating and submitting translations of this 
article.&lt;/p&gt;
+&lt;/div&gt;
+
+&lt;!-- Regarding copyright, in general, standalone pages (as opposed to
+     files generated as part of manuals) on the GNU web server should
+     be under CC BY-ND <span class="removed"><del><strong>3.0 
US.</strong></del></span> <span 
class="inserted"><ins><em>4.0.</em></ins></span>  Please do NOT change or 
remove this
+     without talking with the webmasters or licensing team first.
+     Please make sure the copyright date is consistent with the
+     document.  For web pages, it is ok to list just the latest year the
+     document was modified, or published.
+     
+     If you wish to list earlier years, that is ok too.
+     Either "2001, 2002, 2003" or "2001-2003" are ok for specifying
+     years, as long as each year in the range is in fact a copyrightable
+     year, i.e., a year in which the document was published (including
+     being publicly visible on the web or in a revision control system).
+     
+     There is more detail about copyright years in the GNU Maintainers
+     Information document, www.gnu.org/prep/maintain. --&gt;
+
+&lt;p&gt;Copyright &copy; 1997, 1998, 1999, 2000, 2007, 2008, 2009, <span 
class="removed"><del><strong>2010</strong></del></span> <span 
class="inserted"><ins><em>2010, 2017</em></ins></span> Free
+Software Foundation, Inc.&lt;/p&gt;
+
+&lt;p&gt;This page is licensed under a &lt;a rel="license"
+<span 
class="removed"><del><strong>href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/3.0/us/"&gt;Creative</strong></del></span>
+<span 
class="inserted"><ins><em>href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/"&gt;Creative</em></ins></span>
+Commons <span class="removed"><del><strong>Attribution-NoDerivs 3.0 United 
States</strong></del></span> <span 
class="inserted"><ins><em>Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 
International</em></ins></span> License&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
+
+&lt;!--#include virtual="/server/bottom-notes.html" --&gt;
+
+&lt;p class="unprintable"&gt;Updated:
+&lt;!-- timestamp start --&gt;
+$Date: 2017/08/24 12:29:16 $
+&lt;!-- timestamp end --&gt;
+&lt;/p&gt;
+&lt;/div&gt;
+&lt;/div&gt;
+&lt;/body&gt;
+&lt;/html&gt;
+</pre></body></html>

Index: po/whats-wrong-with-youtube.ja-diff.html
===================================================================
RCS file: po/whats-wrong-with-youtube.ja-diff.html
diff -N po/whats-wrong-with-youtube.ja-diff.html
--- /dev/null   1 Jan 1970 00:00:00 -0000
+++ po/whats-wrong-with-youtube.ja-diff.html    24 Aug 2017 12:29:16 -0000      
1.1
@@ -0,0 +1,154 @@
+<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Strict//EN"
+    "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-strict.dtd";>
+<!-- Generated by GNUN -->
+<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"; xml:lang="en" lang="en">
+<head>
+<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8" />
+<title>/philosophy/whats-wrong-with-youtube.html-diff</title>
+<style type="text/css">
+span.removed { background-color: #f22; color: #000; }
+span.inserted { background-color: #2f2; color: #000; }
+</style></head>
+<body><pre>
+&lt;!--#include virtual="/server/header.html" --&gt;
+&lt;!-- Parent-Version: 1.79 --&gt;
+
+&lt;title&gt;What's Wrong with YouTube
+- GNU Project - Free Software Foundation&lt;/title&gt;
+ &lt;!--#include virtual="/philosophy/po/whats-wrong-with-youtube.translist" 
--&gt;
+&lt;!--#include virtual="/server/banner.html" --&gt;
+&lt;h2&gt;What's Wrong with YouTube&lt;/h2&gt;
+
+&lt;p&gt;Please
+cite &lt;a href="http://audio-video.gnu.org/"&gt;audio-video.gnu.org&lt;/a&gt; 
as
+the site for videos of my speeches &mdash; not YouTube.&lt;/p&gt;
+
+&lt;p&gt;There are two problems with YouTube as a place to post
+videos or refer to videos.&lt;/p&gt;
+
+&lt;ul&gt;
+&lt;li&gt;Normal use of YouTube involves use of nonfree software.
+
+  &lt;ul&gt;
+   &lt;li&gt;In the HTML5 mode, it involves running
+   a &lt;a href="/philosophy/javascript-trap.html"&gt;nonfree JavaScript
+   program&lt;/a&gt;.  For some videos, it also requires the nonfree Adobe
+   DRM software that has been incorporated into proprietary browsers
+   and Firefox, but not into the GNU browsers
+   including &lt;a href="/software/icecat"&gt;IceCat&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/li&gt;
+
+   &lt;li&gt;In the <span 
class="inserted"><ins><em>(deprecated)</em></ins></span> non-HTML5 mode, it 
involves use of Flash
+   Player, which is nonfree.  It even tells users to install Flash <span 
class="removed"><del><strong>Player.  (This
+   mode was deprecated by YouTube as of January 
2015.)&lt;/li&gt;</strong></del></span>
+   <span class="inserted"><ins><em>Player.&lt;/li&gt;</em></ins></span>
+  &lt;/ul&gt;
+&lt;/li&gt;
+
+&lt;li&gt;YouTube tries to stop people from downloading copies.
+
+ <span class="removed"><del><strong>&lt;p&gt;The developers of youtube-dl need 
to keep changing it as the site
+   changes.</strong></del></span>
+   The <span class="removed"><del><strong>mere 
&lt;em&gt;attempt&lt;/em&gt;</strong></del></span> <span 
class="inserted"><ins><em>nonfree JavaScript code for some videos does not allow
+   the browser</em></ins></span> to <span class="removed"><del><strong>stop 
you from downloading</strong></del></span> <span 
class="inserted"><ins><em>save</em></ins></span> a
+   <span class="removed"><del><strong>file</strong></del></span> <span 
class="inserted"><ins><em>copy.  This</em></ins></span> is <span 
class="removed"><del><strong>wrongdoing even if you can overcome 
it.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/li&gt;</strong></del></span> <span 
class="inserted"><ins><em>a form of DRM.
+&lt;/li&gt;</em></ins></span>
+&lt;/ul&gt;
+
+&lt;p&gt;The free software community has made progress in overcoming these
+problems.  It is getting easier to access YouTube videos (except those
+with DRM) without running nonfree software.  Indeed, the HTML5 Video
+Everywhere add-on for Firefox (included in IceCat) takes care of this,
+though it occasionally breaks temporarily when sites change their
+undocumented APIs.&lt;/p&gt;
+
+&lt;p&gt;However, most users don't use such methods, so putting a video on
+YouTube usually leads people to watch it by running nonfree
+software.&lt;/p&gt;
+
+&lt;p&gt;One thing about YouTube that is &lt;em&gt;not&lt;/em&gt; a moral 
strike against
+it is nonfree software on YouTube servers &mdash; if there is any.  We
+as possible users of YouTube can't tell whether the servers run any
+nonfree software, because that has no effect on us &mdash; therefore
+it doesn't do wrong to us.&lt;/p&gt;
+
+&lt;p&gt;If there are any nonfree programs running on YouTube servers, they
+mistreat Google by denying Google control of that aspect of its
+computing.  We hope that Google will reclaim its freedom by ceasing to
+use those nonfree programs, if any.  But those programs do not mistreat
+the &lt;em&gt;users&lt;/em&gt; of YouTube, so they are not a reason to refuse
+to &lt;em&gt;use&lt;/em&gt; that service.&lt;/p&gt;
+
+&lt;hr/&gt;
+
+&lt;p&gt;Dailymotion and Vimeo have the same problem as YouTube's HTML5
+option: viewing their videos in the normal way requires nonfree
+JavaScript code.  If there is any commercial video-hosting platform
+that doesn't have this problem, please inform us.&lt;/p&gt;
+
+&lt;hr/&gt;
+
+&lt;p&gt;To post a video without requiring nonfree software to view it,
+you can place the video as an Ogg or WebM file on an ordinary web site.
+If you are concerned there will be a lot of download traffic, you
+can seed a torrent and suggest people download through that.&lt;/p&gt;
+
+&lt;p&gt;Another way to publish videos on the web using free software is
+&lt;a href="http://mediagoblin.org/"&gt;GNU MediaGoblin&lt;/a&gt;.  Ideally
+you will set up
+&lt;a href="http://docs.mediagoblin.org/"&gt;your own server&lt;/a&gt;, or run
+one for your family and friends, but you can also post on
+&lt;a href="https://wiki.mediagoblin.org/Live_instances"&gt;public
+servers&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
+
+&lt;p&gt;Please
+&lt;a href="https://wiki.mediagoblin.org/HackingHowto"&gt;contribute to
+GNU MediaGoblin&lt;/a&gt; if you can.&lt;/p&gt;
+
+&lt;/div&gt;&lt;!-- for id="content", starts in the include above --&gt;
+&lt;!--#include virtual="/server/footer.html" --&gt;
+&lt;div id="footer"&gt;
+&lt;div class="unprintable"&gt;
+
+&lt;p&gt;Please send general FSF &amp; GNU inquiries to
+&lt;a href="mailto:address@hidden"&gt;&lt;address@hidden&gt;&lt;/a&gt;.
+There are also &lt;a href="/contact/"&gt;other ways to contact&lt;/a&gt;
+the FSF.  Broken links and other corrections or suggestions can be sent
+to &lt;a 
href="mailto:address@hidden"&gt;&lt;address@hidden&gt;&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
+
+&lt;p&gt;&lt;!-- TRANSLATORS: Ignore the original text in this paragraph,
+        replace it with the translation of these two:
+
+        We work hard and do our best to provide accurate, good quality
+        translations.  However, we are not exempt from imperfection.
+        Please send your comments and general suggestions in this regard
+        to &lt;a href="mailto:address@hidden"&gt;
+        &lt;address@hidden&gt;&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
+
+        &lt;p&gt;For information on coordinating and submitting translations of
+        our web pages, see &lt;a
+        href="/server/standards/README.translations.html"&gt;Translations
+        README&lt;/a&gt;. --&gt;
+Please see the &lt;a
+href="/server/standards/README.translations.html"&gt;Translations
+README&lt;/a&gt; for information on coordinating and submitting translations
+of this article.&lt;/p&gt;
+&lt;/div&gt;
+
+&lt;p&gt;Copyright &copy; 2015, <span 
class="removed"><del><strong>2016</strong></del></span> <span 
class="inserted"><ins><em>2016, 2017</em></ins></span> Free Software 
Foundation, Inc.&lt;/p&gt;
+
+&lt;p&gt;This page is licensed under a &lt;a rel="license"
+href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/"&gt;Creative
+Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International 
License&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
+
+&lt;!--#include virtual="/server/bottom-notes.html" --&gt;
+
+&lt;p class="unprintable"&gt;Updated:
+&lt;!-- timestamp start --&gt;
+$Date: 2017/08/24 12:29:16 $
+&lt;!-- timestamp end --&gt;
+&lt;/p&gt;
+&lt;/div&gt;
+&lt;/div&gt;
+&lt;/body&gt;
+&lt;/html&gt;
+</pre></body></html>



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]