www-commits
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

www/philosophy not-ipr.zh-cn.html po/not-ipr.zh...


From: GNUN
Subject: www/philosophy not-ipr.zh-cn.html po/not-ipr.zh...
Date: Sat, 5 Aug 2017 02:00:45 -0400 (EDT)

CVSROOT:        /web/www
Module name:    www
Changes by:     GNUN <gnun>     17/08/05 02:00:45

Modified files:
        philosophy     : not-ipr.zh-cn.html 
        philosophy/po  : not-ipr.zh-cn-en.html not-ipr.zh-cn.po 

Log message:
        Automatic update by GNUnited Nations.

CVSWeb URLs:
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/not-ipr.zh-cn.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.24&r2=1.25
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/po/not-ipr.zh-cn-en.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.13&r2=1.14
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/po/not-ipr.zh-cn.po?cvsroot=www&r1=1.26&r2=1.27

Patches:
Index: not-ipr.zh-cn.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/not-ipr.zh-cn.html,v
retrieving revision 1.24
retrieving revision 1.25
diff -u -b -r1.24 -r1.25
--- not-ipr.zh-cn.html  9 Nov 2016 09:01:50 -0000       1.24
+++ not-ipr.zh-cn.html  5 Aug 2017 06:00:44 -0000       1.25
@@ -1,25 +1,13 @@
-<!--#set var="PO_FILE"
- value='<a href="/philosophy/po/not-ipr.zh-cn.po">
- https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/po/not-ipr.zh-cn.po</a>'
- --><!--#set var="ORIGINAL_FILE" value="/philosophy/not-ipr.html"
- --><!--#set var="DIFF_FILE" value="/philosophy/po/not-ipr.zh-cn-diff.html"
- --><!--#set var="OUTDATED_SINCE" value="2013-07-22" -->
+<!--#set var="ENGLISH_PAGE" value="/philosophy/not-ipr.en.html" -->
+
 <!--#include virtual="/server/header.zh-cn.html" -->
+<!-- Parent-Version: 1.79 -->
 
 <!-- This file is automatically generated by GNUnited Nations! -->
-<!--#set var="DISABLE_TOP_ADDENDUM" value="yes" -->
- <!--#set var="ENGLISH_PAGE" value="/philosophy/not-ipr.en.html" -->
-
-<title>还在用&ldquo;知识产权&rdquo;这词吗?它只是看上去很美 
- GNU 工程 - 自由软件基金会 </title>
+<title>还在用&ldquo;知识产权&rdquo;这词吗?它只是看上去很美 
- GNU 工程 - 自由软件基金会 (FSF)</title>
 
-<!-- Fixed by hand on August 20, 2014:
-     - disable top addendum,
-     - partially update footer.
--->
 <!--#include virtual="/philosophy/po/not-ipr.translist" -->
 <!--#include virtual="/server/banner.zh-cn.html" -->
-<!--#include virtual="/server/outdated.zh-cn.html" -->
- 
 
<h2>还在用&ldquo;知识产权&rdquo;这词吗?它只是看上去很美</h2>
 
 <p><a href="http://www.stallman.org/";>理查德·斯托曼</a> 著</p>
@@ -33,8 +21,8 @@
 <p>
 按照现任职于斯坦福大学法学院的 Mark Lemley 
教授的说法,&ldquo;知识产权&rdquo;这一术语的流行始于 1967
 年世界知识产权组织(WIPO)成立之后。最近几
年对这个词汇的使用则越来越频繁。(世界知识产权组织从属于联合国,但实é™
…上却是代表着版权、专利和商标持有者
的利益。)广泛使用该词大约要追溯到<a
-href="http://ngrams.googlelabs.com/graph?content=intellectual+property&amp;year_start=1800&amp;year_end=2008&amp;corpus=0&amp;smoothing=1";>1990年</a>上下。(<a
-href="http://www.gnu.org/graphics/seductivemirage.png";>本地截图</a>)
+href="https://books.google.com/ngrams/graph?content=intellectual+property&amp;year_start=1800&amp;year_end=2008&amp;corpus=15&amp;smoothing=1&amp;share=&amp;direct_url=t1%3B%2Cintellectual%20property%3B%2Cc0";>1990年左右</a>。(<a
+href="/graphics/seductivemirage.png">本地截图</a>)
 </p>
 
 <p>
@@ -46,12 +34,12 @@
 或者
每类找个替换的词(不过这多半是开玩笑)。比如有这么一些建议:&ldquo;强行垄断特权&rdquo;(Imposed
 Monopoly
 Priviledges, 
IMP);&ldquo;政策性合法强制垄断&rdquo;(Government-Originated 
Legally
 Enforced Monopolies, 
GOLEM)。还有人建议说是&ldquo;排他性权利域&rdquo;(exclusive 
rights
-regimes),不过一说起限制&ldquo;权利&rdquo;这事,那就又得来个双重思想了(<a
-href="#TransNote1">译注1</a>)。
+regimes),不过一说起限制&ldquo;权利&rdquo;这事儿,那就又得来个双重思想<sup><a
+href="#TransNote1">1</a></sup>了。
 </p>
 
 <p>
-这些替代词往往比原词有了不小的改进。不过无
论&ldquo;知识产权&rdquo;这词换成什么,都是个错误。单纯换个词,并不能解决深层次的问题:过度概括。这世界上压æ
 
¹å°±æ²¡æœ‰è¿™ä¹ˆä¸€ç§æ‰åˆåœ¨ä¸€èµ·çš„,叫做&ldquo;知识产权&rdquo;的东西。那就是朵浮云。人们之所以觉得版权、专利、商æ
 ‡è¿˜æœ‰é‚£äº›å…¶ä»–东西是一个有机的整体,恰恰是因
为普遍地使用&ldquo;知识产权&rdquo;这词所带来的误导。
+这些替代词往往比原词有了不小的改进。不过无
论&ldquo;知识产权&rdquo;这词换成什么,都是个错误。单纯换个词,并不能解决深层次的问题:过度概括。这世界上压æ
 
¹å°±æ²¡æœ‰è¿™ä¹ˆä¸€ç§æ‰åˆåœ¨ä¸€èµ·çš„,叫做&ldquo;知识产权&rdquo;的东西。那就是朵浮云。人们之所以觉得版权、专利、商æ
 ‡è¿˜æœ‰é‚£äº›å…¶ä»–东西是一个有机的整体,恰恰是因
为普遍地使用&ldquo;知识产权&rdquo;这词对相关法律造
成了误导。
 </p>
 
 <p>
@@ -63,11 +51,11 @@
 </p>
 
 <p>
-版权法被设计用以鼓励和推动创作和技术。它覆盖了整个创作实现的每个细节。专利法则意在推进实用创意的发布。通过在一定时期å†
…,赋予创意者
对该创意的垄断权,来达到此目的&mdash;这一垄断权在有些领域可能是值得给的,而有些领域中则不值得。
+比如,版权法被设计用以鼓励和推动创作和技术。它覆盖了整个创作实现的每个细节。专利法则意在推进实用创意的发布。通过在一定时期å†
…,赋予创意者
对该创意的垄断权,来达到此目的&mdash;这一垄断权在有些领域可能是值得给的,而有些领域中则不值得。
 </p>
 
 <p>
-相反,商æ 
‡æ³•åˆ™ä¸æ˜¯ç”¨ä»¥æŽ¨åŠ¨ä»€ä¹ˆç‰¹æ®Šæ´»åŠ¨ã€‚它只是用来让消费者
们知道自己买了什么。而立法者
们由于被&ldquo;知识产权&rdquo;这个词影响,认为商æ 
‡æ³•æ˜¯ç”¨ä»¥æŽ¨åŠ¨å¹¿å‘Šå®£ä¼ çš„。
+相反,商æ 
‡æ³•åˆ™ä¸æ˜¯ç”¨ä»¥æŽ¨åŠ¨ä»€ä¹ˆç‰¹æ®Šæ´»åŠ¨ã€‚它只是用来让消费者
们知道自己买了什么。而立法者
们由于被&ldquo;知识产权&rdquo;这个词影响,认为商æ 
‡æ³•æ˜¯ç”¨ä»¥æŽ¨åŠ¨å¹¿å‘Šå®£ä¼ 
的。这些还只是该词所涉及的众多法律中的三个例子。
 </p>
 
 <p>
@@ -75,7 +63,19 @@
 </p>
 
 <p>
-人们说&ldquo;知识产权&rdquo;的时候,往往是指代着一些更大或è€
…更小的领域。比如说,一些富强的国家往往给贫困国家强加
一些不平等的法律,从中榨取利益。这å…
¶ä¸­æœ‰äº›å°±æ˜¯æ‰€è°“çš„&ldquo;知识产权&rdquo;法,还有一些则不是。可是批评人士总是喜欢抓着&ldquo;知识产权&rdquo;的æ
 ‡ç­¾åˆ°å¤„乱贴,因为他们更熟悉这些内
容。在使用的过程中,他们往往错误地解读了这些问题。这时候就需要些更宽泛的词,比如&ldquo;法律殖民&rdquo;,这才算是说到点上。
+实际上,几乎你看到的所有使用 &ldquo;知识产权&rdquo; 
的一般性陈述都是错误的。比如,你会看到声称 
&ldquo;该词&rdquo;
+的目的是 &ldquo;推动创新&rdquo; 的说法,但是创新仅
适用于专利法,或许还适用于植物品种垄断法<sup><a
+href="#TransNote2">2</a></sup>。版权法无å…
³åˆ›æ–°ï¼›å³ä½¿æ²¡æœ‰ä»»ä½•åˆ›æ–°å…ƒç´ ï¼Œæµè¡Œæ­Œæ›²æˆ–畅销书也å…
·æœ‰ç‰ˆæƒã€‚商标法也无关创新;如果我开了一个叫做
+&ldquo;rms tea&rdquo;
+的茶店,那么该名字是商标,无论我是否和别人一æ 
·å–茶。贸易秘密法也无å…
³åˆ›æ–°ï¼Œè‡³å¤šä¹Ÿåªæ˜¯æ²¾è¾¹ï¼›æˆ‘的茶店客户名单也算贸易秘密,但这和创新毫æ—
 å…³ç³»ã€‚</p>
+
+<p>
+你还会看到声称 &ldquo;知识产权&rdquo; 关乎 &ldquo;创造力&rdquo;
+的说法,但实际上创造力仅
适用于版权法。专利发明的要求不仅仅是创造力。商æ 
‡æ³•å’Œè´¸æ˜“秘密法也无关创造力;&ldquo;rms tea&rdquo;
+这个名字根本不需要创造
力,我的茶店客户名单也不需要创造力。</p>
+
+<p>
+人们说&ldquo;知识产权&rdquo;的时候,往往是指代着一些更大或è€
…
更小类别的法律。比如说,一些富强的国家往往给贫困国家强åŠ
 ä¸€äº›ä¸å¹³ç­‰çš„法律,从中榨取利益。这å…
¶ä¸­æœ‰äº›å°±æ˜¯æ‰€è°“çš„&ldquo;知识产权&rdquo;法,还有一些则不是。可是批评人士总是喜欢抓着&ldquo;知识产权&rdquo;的æ
 ‡ç­¾åˆ°å¤„乱贴,因为他们更熟悉这些内
容。在使用的过程中,他们往往错误地解读了这些问题的实质。这时候就需要些更准确的词,比如&ldquo;法律殖民&rdquo;,这才算是说到点子上。
 </p>
 
 <p>
@@ -115,66 +115,121 @@
 </p>
 
 <p>
+拒绝 &ldquo;知识产权&rdquo; 不仅仅
是哲学式的消遣。这个词着实有害。Apple 使用它来 <a
+href="https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2017/mar/11/nebraska-farmers-right-to-repair-bill-stalls-apple";>歪曲å
…³äºŽ
+Nebraska 的 &ldquo;维修权利&rdquo; 
法案</a>。这个虚假的概念使得 Apple
+能够在和客户发生权益冲突时,装
扮成更愿意保守商业秘密的æ 
·å­ï¼Œè€Œè¿«ä½¿å®¢æˆ·å’Œæ”¿åºœå±ˆæœã€‚</p>
+
+<p>
 假如你希望清晰地思考专利问题、版权问题、商æ 
‡é—®é¢˜æˆ–是其他法律相å…
³çš„问题,那么第一步要做的,就是尝试不要把它们搅
和在一起,应该把它们当作不同的问题,分开对待
。第二步,则是要拒绝接受由&ldquo;知识产权&rdquo;这词描述的那个狭隘单纯的世界。不同问题区分对å¾
…,每一点都考虑到,这样你
才有可能对它们有更深刻的认识。
 </p>
 
 
<p>另外,这也是时候去改变世界知识产权组织(WIPO)了,这里有<a
 
href="http://fsfe.org/projects/wipo/wiwo.en.html";>一份要求他们更名的提案</a>。
+</p>
+
+<hr />
 
+<p>
+还可以参阅 <a href="/philosophy/komongistan.html">Komongistan 
的奇特历史(打破
+&ldquo;知识产权&rdquo; 的概念)</a>。
 </p>
 
+<p>
+非洲的国家更象这些法律,并且 &ldquo;非洲&rdquo; 也是一个清
晰的地理概念;尽管如此,<a
+href="http://www.theguardian.com/world/2014/jan/24/africa-clinton";> 谈论
+&ldquo;非洲&rdquo; 
而不是特指某个非洲国家还是会导致许多困惑</a>。
+</p>
+
+<p>
+<a
+href="http://torrentfreak.com/language-matters-framing-the-copyright-monopoly-so-we-can-keep-our-liberties-130714/";>Rickard
+Falkvinge 支持废除该术语</a>。</p>
+
+<p><a
+href="http://www.locusmag.com/Perspectives/2016/11/cory-doctorow-sole-and-despotic-dominion/";>Cory
+Doctorow 也认为知识产权</a> 这一术语 &ldquo;不当。&rdquo;</p>
+
 <div class="translators-notes">
 
 <!--TRANSLATORS: Use space (SPC) as msgstr if you don't have notes.-->
-<b>译注</b>
+<h3>译注</h3>
 <ol>
 <li
 
id="TransNote1">双重思想,doublethink。源自乔治·奥维尔的小说《一九å
…«å››ã€‹ã€‚特指同时接受了两种相互矛盾的思想。</li>
+<li id="TransNote2">植物品种垄断法,Plant Variety 
Monopoly。用来保护育种专利和种植专利的法律。</li>
 </ol></div>
 </div>
 
+<!-- for id="content", starts in the include above -->
 <!--#include virtual="/server/footer.zh-cn.html" -->
 <div id="footer">
 <div class="unprintable">
 
-<p>
-请将有关自由软件基金会与 GNU 
的查询与问题(以英语)发送到<a
-href="mailto:address@hidden";>&lt;address@hidden&gt;</a>。您也可以通过<a
-href="/contact/">其它方法</a>联系自由软件基金会。
-发现任何错误和链接或å…
¶å®ƒéœ€è¦æ›´æ­£çš„地方(或任何建议),请发送邮件至<a
-href="mailto:address@hidden";>&lt;address@hidden&gt;</a>。
-</p>
-
-<p>
+<p>请将有关自由软件基金会(FSF) &amp; GNU 的一般性 &amp; 
问题发送到<a
+href="mailto:address@hidden";>&lt;address@hidden&gt;</a>。也可以通过 <a
+href="/contact/">其他联系方法</a> 
联系自由软件基金会(FSF)。有关失效链接或å…
¶ä»–错误和建议,请发送邮件到<a
+href="mailto:address@hidden";>&lt;address@hidden&gt;</a>。</p>
+
+<p>
+<!-- TRANSLATORS: Ignore the original text in this paragraph,
+        replace it with the translation of these two:
+
+        We work hard and do our best to provide accurate, good quality
+        translations.  However, we are not exempt from imperfection.
+        Please send your comments and general suggestions in this regard
+        to <a href="mailto:address@hidden";>
+
+        &lt;address@hidden&gt;</a>.</p>
+
+        <p>For information on coordinating and submitting translations of
+        our web pages, see <a
+        href="/server/standards/README.translations.html">Translations
+        README</a>. -->
 若您想翻译本文,请参看<a
-href="/server/standards/README.translations.html">翻译手册</a>获取有å…
³åè°ƒå’Œæäº¤ç¿»è¯‘的相关事项。
-</p>
+href="/server/standards/README.translations.html">翻译须知</a>获取有å…
³åè°ƒå’Œæäº¤ç¿»è¯‘的相关事项。</p>
 </div>
 
-<p>
-Copyright &copy; 2004, 2006, 2010 Richard M. Stallman
-<br />
-本文采用<a rel="license"
-href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/3.0/us/";>CC署名-禁止演绎协议美国3.0版</a>授权
-</p>
+<!-- Regarding copyright, in general, standalone pages (as opposed to
+     files generated as part of manuals) on the GNU web server should
+     be under CC BY-ND 4.0.  Please do NOT change or remove this
+     without talking with the webmasters or licensing team first.
+     Please make sure the copyright date is consistent with the
+     document.  For web pages, it is ok to list just the latest year the
+     document was modified, or published.
+     
+     If you wish to list earlier years, that is ok too.
+     Either "2001, 2002, 2003" or "2001-2003" are ok for specifying
+     years, as long as each year in the range is in fact a copyrightable
+     year, i.e., a year in which the document was published (including
+     being publicly visible on the web or in a revision control system).
+     
+     There is more detail about copyright years in the GNU Maintainers
+     Information document, www.gnu.org/prep/maintain. -->
+<p>Copyright &copy; 2004, 2006, 2010, 2013, 2015, 2016, 2017 Richard
+M. Stallman</p>
+
+<p>本页面基于 <a rel="license"
+href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/";>Creative Commons
+Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License</a> 授权。</p>
 
 <!--#include virtual="/server/bottom-notes.zh-cn.html" -->
 <div class="translators-credits">
 
 <!--TRANSLATORS: Use space (SPC) as msgstr if you don't want credits.-->
-<b>翻译:</b>邓楠 2010<br />
-<b>审校:</b>李凡希 2010</div>
-
+<b>翻译</b>:邓楠,2010。
+<b>审校</b>:李凡希,2010。
+<b>翻译团队</b>:<a rel="team"
+href="https://savannah.gnu.org/projects/www-zh-cn/";>&lt;CTT&gt;</a>,2017。</div>
 
 <p class="unprintable"><!-- timestamp start -->
-最后更新
+最后更新:
 
-$Date: 2016/11/09 09:01:50 $
+$Date: 2017/08/05 06:00:44 $
 
 <!-- timestamp end -->
 </p>
 </div>
-
 </div>
 </body>
 </html>

Index: po/not-ipr.zh-cn-en.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/po/not-ipr.zh-cn-en.html,v
retrieving revision 1.13
retrieving revision 1.14
diff -u -b -r1.13 -r1.14
--- po/not-ipr.zh-cn-en.html    28 Feb 2013 19:12:49 -0000      1.13
+++ po/not-ipr.zh-cn-en.html    5 Aug 2017 06:00:45 -0000       1.14
@@ -1,5 +1,7 @@
 <!--#include virtual="/server/header.html" -->
-<title>Did You Say &ldquo;Intellectual Property&rdquo;?  It's a Seductive 
Mirage - GNU Project - Free Software Foundation (FSF)</title>
+<!-- Parent-Version: 1.79 -->
+<title>Did You Say &ldquo;Intellectual Property&rdquo;?  It's a Seductive 
Mirage
+- GNU Project - Free Software Foundation</title>
 <!--#include virtual="/philosophy/po/not-ipr.translist" -->
 <!--#include virtual="/server/banner.html" -->
 <h2>Did You Say &ldquo;Intellectual Property&rdquo;?  It's a Seductive 
Mirage</h2>
@@ -23,7 +25,7 @@
 Property&rdquo; Organization (WIPO), and only became really common in recent
 years. (WIPO is formally a UN organization, but in fact represents the
 interests of the holders of copyrights, patents, and trademarks.) Wide use 
dates from
-<a 
href="http://ngrams.googlelabs.com/graph?content=intellectual+property&amp;year_start=1800&amp;year_end=2008&amp;corpus=0&amp;smoothing=1";>around
+<a 
href="https://books.google.com/ngrams/graph?content=intellectual+property&amp;year_start=1800&amp;year_end=2008&amp;corpus=15&amp;smoothing=1&amp;share=&amp;direct_url=t1%3B%2Cintellectual%20property%3B%2Cc0";>around
 1990</a>. (<a href="/graphics/seductivemirage.png">Local image copy</a>)
 </p>
 
@@ -56,7 +58,7 @@
 overgeneralization.  There is no such unified thing as
 &ldquo;intellectual property&rdquo;&mdash;it is a mirage.  The only
 reason people think it makes sense as a coherent category is that
-widespread use of the term has misled them.
+widespread use of the term has misled them about the laws in question.
 </p>
 
 <p>
@@ -73,11 +75,12 @@
 </p>
 
 <p>
-Copyright law was designed to promote authorship and art, and covers
-the details of expression of a work.  Patent law was intended to
-promote the publication of useful ideas, at the price of giving the
-one who publishes an idea a temporary monopoly over it&mdash;a price
-that may be worth paying in some fields and not in others.
+For instance, copyright law was designed to promote authorship and
+art, and covers the details of expression of a work.  Patent law was
+intended to promote the publication of useful ideas, at the price of
+giving the one who publishes an idea a temporary monopoly over
+it&mdash;a price that may be worth paying in some fields and not in
+others.
 </p>
 
 <p>
@@ -85,7 +88,8 @@
 way of acting, but simply to enable buyers to know what they are
 buying.  Legislators under the influence of the term &ldquo;intellectual
 property&rdquo;, however, have turned it into a scheme that provides
-incentives for advertising.
+incentives for advertising.  And these are just
+three out of many laws that the term refers to.
 </p>
 
 <p>
@@ -96,15 +100,37 @@
 </p>
 
 <p>
+In practice, nearly all general statements you encounter that are
+formulated using &ldquo;intellectual property&rdquo; will be false.
+For instance, you'll see claims that &ldquo;its&rdquo; purpose is to
+&ldquo;promote innovation&rdquo;, but that only fits patent law and
+perhaps plant variety monopolies.  Copyright law is not concerned with
+innovation; a pop song or novel is copyrighted even if there is
+nothing innovative about it.  Trademark law is not concerned with
+innovation; if I start a tea store and call it &ldquo;rms tea&rdquo;,
+that would be a solid trademark even if I sell the same teas in the
+same way as everyone else.  Trade secret law is not concerned with
+innovation, except tangentially; my list of tea customers would be a
+trade secret with nothing to do with innovation.</p>
+
+<p>
+You will also see assertions that &ldquo;intellectual property&rdquo;
+is concerned with &ldquo;creativity&rdquo;, but really that only fits
+copyright law.  More than creativity is needed to make a patentable
+invention.  Trademark law and trade secret law have nothing to do with
+creativity; the name &ldquo;rms tea&rdquo; isn't creative at all, and
+neither is my secret list of tea customers.</p>
+
+<p>
 People often say &ldquo;intellectual property&rdquo; when they really
-mean some larger or smaller category.  For instance, rich countries
+mean some larger or smaller set of laws.  For instance, rich countries
 often impose unjust laws on poor countries to squeeze money out of
-them.  Some of these laws are &ldquo;intellectual property&rdquo; laws,
-and others are not; nonetheless, critics of the practice often grab
-for that label because it has become familiar to them.  By using it,
-they misrepresent the nature of the issue.  It would be better to use
-an accurate term, such as &ldquo;legislative colonization&rdquo;, that
-gets to the heart of the matter.
+them.  Some of these laws are among those called &ldquo;intellectual
+property&rdquo; laws, and others are not; nonetheless, critics of the
+practice often grab for that label because it has become familiar to
+them.  By using it, they misrepresent the nature of the issue.  It
+would be better to use an accurate term, such as &ldquo;legislative
+colonization&rdquo;, that gets to the heart of the matter.
 </p>
 
 <p>
@@ -126,9 +152,9 @@
 <p>
 That statement refers to Article 1, Section 8, Clause 8 of the US
 Constitution, which authorizes copyright law and patent law.  That
-clause, though, has nothing to do with trademark law or various
-others.  The term &ldquo;intellectual property&rdquo; led that
-professor to make false generalization.
+clause, though, has nothing to do with trademark law, trade secret
+law, or various others.  The term &ldquo;intellectual property&rdquo;
+led that professor to make a false generalization.
 </p>
 
 <p>
@@ -181,6 +207,15 @@
 </p>
 
 <p>
+Rejection of &ldquo;intellectual property&rdquo; is not mere
+philosophical recreation.  The term does real harm.  Apple used it
+to <a 
href="https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2017/mar/11/nebraska-farmers-right-to-repair-bill-stalls-apple";>warp
 debate about Nebraska's
+&ldquo;right to repair&rdquo; bill</a>.  The bogus concept gave
+Apple a way to dress up its preference for secrecy, which conficts
+with its customers' rights, as a supposed principle that customers
+and the state must yield to.</p>
+
+<p>
 If you want to think clearly about the issues raised by patents, or
 copyrights, or trademarks, or various other different laws, the first
 step is to
@@ -194,46 +229,93 @@
 <p>And when it comes to reforming WIPO, here is <a
 href="http://fsfe.org/projects/wipo/wiwo.en.html";>one proposal for
 changing the name and substance of WIPO</a>.
-
 </p>
-</div>
-<!--#include virtual="/server/footer.html" -->
-<div id="footer">
+
+<hr />
 
 <p>
-Please send FSF &amp; GNU inquiries to 
-<a href="mailto:address@hidden";><em>address@hidden</em></a>.
-There are also <a href="/contact/">other ways to contact</a> 
-the FSF.
-<br />
-Please send broken links and other corrections or suggestions to
-<a href="mailto:address@hidden";><em>address@hidden</em></a>.
+See also <a href="/philosophy/komongistan.html">The Curious History of 
+Komongistan (Busting the term &ldquo;intellectual property&rdquo;)</a>.
 </p>
 
 <p>
-Please see the 
-<a href="/server/standards/README.translations.html">Translations
-README</a> for information on coordinating and submitting
-translations of this article.
+Countries in Africa are a lot more similar than these laws, and
+&ldquo;Africa&rdquo; is a coherent geographical concept; nonetheless,
+<a href="http://www.theguardian.com/world/2014/jan/24/africa-clinton";>
+talking about &ldquo;Africa&rdquo; instead of a specific country
+causes lots of confusion</a>.
 </p>
 
 <p>
-Copyright &copy; 2004, 2006, 2010 Richard M. Stallman
-<br />
-This page is licensed under a <a rel="license"
-href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/3.0/us/";>Creative
-Commons Attribution-NoDerivs 3.0 United States License</a>.
-</p>
+<a 
href="http://torrentfreak.com/language-matters-framing-the-copyright-monopoly-so-we-can-keep-our-liberties-130714/";>
+Rickard Falkvinge supports rejection of this term</a>.</p>
+
+<p><a
+href="http://www.locusmag.com/Perspectives/2016/11/cory-doctorow-sole-and-despotic-dominion/";>
+Cory Doctorow also condemns</a> the term &ldquo;intellectual
+property.&rdquo;</p>
+
+</div><!-- for id="content", starts in the include above -->
+<!--#include virtual="/server/footer.html" -->
+<div id="footer">
+<div class="unprintable">
+
+<p>Please send general FSF &amp; GNU inquiries to
+<a href="mailto:address@hidden";>&lt;address@hidden&gt;</a>.
+There are also <a href="/contact/">other ways to contact</a>
+the FSF.  Broken links and other corrections or suggestions can be sent
+to <a href="mailto:address@hidden";>&lt;address@hidden&gt;</a>.</p>
+
+<p><!-- TRANSLATORS: Ignore the original text in this paragraph,
+        replace it with the translation of these two:
+
+        We work hard and do our best to provide accurate, good quality
+        translations.  However, we are not exempt from imperfection.
+        Please send your comments and general suggestions in this regard
+        to <a href="mailto:address@hidden";>
+        &lt;address@hidden&gt;</a>.</p>
+
+        <p>For information on coordinating and submitting translations of
+        our web pages, see <a
+        href="/server/standards/README.translations.html">Translations
+        README</a>. -->
+Please see the <a
+href="/server/standards/README.translations.html">Translations
+README</a> for information on coordinating and submitting translations
+of this article.</p>
+</div>
+
+<!-- Regarding copyright, in general, standalone pages (as opposed to
+     files generated as part of manuals) on the GNU web server should
+     be under CC BY-ND 4.0.  Please do NOT change or remove this
+     without talking with the webmasters or licensing team first.
+     Please make sure the copyright date is consistent with the
+     document.  For web pages, it is ok to list just the latest year the
+     document was modified, or published.
+     
+     If you wish to list earlier years, that is ok too.
+     Either "2001, 2002, 2003" or "2001-2003" are ok for specifying
+     years, as long as each year in the range is in fact a copyrightable
+     year, i.e., a year in which the document was published (including
+     being publicly visible on the web or in a revision control system).
+     
+     There is more detail about copyright years in the GNU Maintainers
+     Information document, www.gnu.org/prep/maintain. -->
+
+<p>Copyright &copy; 2004, 2006, 2010, 2013, 2015, 2016, 2017 Richard M. 
Stallman</p>
+
+<p>This page is licensed under a <a rel="license"
+href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/";>Creative
+Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License</a>.</p>
 
 <!--#include virtual="/server/bottom-notes.html" -->
 
-<p>Updated:
+<p class="unprintable">Updated:
 <!-- timestamp start -->
-$Date: 2013/02/28 19:12:49 $
+$Date: 2017/08/05 06:00:45 $
 <!-- timestamp end -->
 </p>
 </div>
-
 </div>
 </body>
 </html>

Index: po/not-ipr.zh-cn.po
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/po/not-ipr.zh-cn.po,v
retrieving revision 1.26
retrieving revision 1.27
diff -u -b -r1.26 -r1.27
--- po/not-ipr.zh-cn.po 5 Aug 2017 05:29:15 -0000       1.26
+++ po/not-ipr.zh-cn.po 5 Aug 2017 06:00:45 -0000       1.27
@@ -15,7 +15,6 @@
 "MIME-Version: 1.0\n"
 "Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8\n"
 "Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit\n"
-"Outdated-Since: 2013-07-22 14:22+0000\n"
 
 # type: Content of: <title>
 #. type: Content of: <title>



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]