[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
www/distros common-distros.de.html common-distr...
|
From: |
GNUN |
|
Subject: |
www/distros common-distros.de.html common-distr... |
|
Date: |
Wed, 19 Jul 2017 11:59:11 -0400 (EDT) |
CVSROOT: /web/www
Module name: www
Changes by: GNUN <gnun> 17/07/19 11:59:11
Modified files:
distros : common-distros.de.html common-distros.pl.html
distros/po : common-distros.pl-diff.html
Added files:
distros/po : common-distros.de-diff.html
Log message:
Automatic update by GNUnited Nations.
CVSWeb URLs:
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/distros/common-distros.de.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.73&r2=1.74
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/distros/common-distros.pl.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.70&r2=1.71
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/distros/po/common-distros.pl-diff.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.6&r2=1.7
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/distros/po/common-distros.de-diff.html?cvsroot=www&rev=1.1
Patches:
Index: common-distros.de.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/distros/common-distros.de.html,v
retrieving revision 1.73
retrieving revision 1.74
diff -u -b -r1.73 -r1.74
--- common-distros.de.html 7 May 2017 14:58:24 -0000 1.73
+++ common-distros.de.html 19 Jul 2017 15:59:11 -0000 1.74
@@ -1,4 +1,9 @@
-<!--#set var="ENGLISH_PAGE" value="/distros/common-distros.en.html" -->
+<!--#set var="PO_FILE"
+ value='<a href="/distros/po/common-distros.de.po">
+ https://www.gnu.org/distros/po/common-distros.de.po</a>'
+ --><!--#set var="ORIGINAL_FILE" value="/distros/common-distros.html"
+ --><!--#set var="DIFF_FILE" value="/distros/po/common-distros.de-diff.html"
+ --><!--#set var="OUTDATED_SINCE" value="2017-05-20" --><!--#set
var="ENGLISH_PAGE" value="/distros/common-distros.en.html" -->
<!--#include virtual="/server/header.de.html" -->
<!-- Parent-Version: 1.79 -->
@@ -12,6 +17,7 @@
<!--#include virtual="/distros/po/common-distros.translist" -->
<!--#include virtual="/server/banner.de.html" -->
+<!--#include virtual="/server/outdated.de.html" -->
<h2>Warum andere Systeme nicht befürwortet werden</h2>
<!--#include virtual="/licenses/fsf-licensing.de.html" -->
@@ -383,7 +389,7 @@
<p class="unprintable"><!-- timestamp start -->
Letzte Ãnderung:
-$Date: 2017/05/07 14:58:24 $
+$Date: 2017/07/19 15:59:11 $
<!-- timestamp end -->
</p>
Index: common-distros.pl.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/distros/common-distros.pl.html,v
retrieving revision 1.70
retrieving revision 1.71
diff -u -b -r1.70 -r1.71
--- common-distros.pl.html 1 May 2017 17:30:35 -0000 1.70
+++ common-distros.pl.html 19 Jul 2017 15:59:11 -0000 1.71
@@ -1,4 +1,9 @@
-<!--#set var="ENGLISH_PAGE" value="/distros/common-distros.en.html" -->
+<!--#set var="PO_FILE"
+ value='<a href="/distros/po/common-distros.pl.po">
+ https://www.gnu.org/distros/po/common-distros.pl.po</a>'
+ --><!--#set var="ORIGINAL_FILE" value="/distros/common-distros.html"
+ --><!--#set var="DIFF_FILE" value="/distros/po/common-distros.pl-diff.html"
+ --><!--#set var="OUTDATED_SINCE" value="2017-05-20" --><!--#set
var="ENGLISH_PAGE" value="/distros/common-distros.en.html" -->
<!--#include virtual="/server/header.pl.html" -->
<!-- Parent-Version: 1.79 -->
@@ -12,6 +17,7 @@
<!--#include virtual="/distros/po/common-distros.translist" -->
<!--#include virtual="/server/banner.pl.html" -->
+<!--#include virtual="/server/outdated.pl.html" -->
<h2>Dlaczego nie popieramy innych systemów</h2>
<!--#include virtual="/licenses/fsf-licensing.pl.html" -->
@@ -356,7 +362,7 @@
<p class="unprintable"><!-- timestamp start -->
Aktualizowane:
-$Date: 2017/05/01 17:30:35 $
+$Date: 2017/07/19 15:59:11 $
<!-- timestamp end -->
</p>
Index: po/common-distros.pl-diff.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/distros/po/common-distros.pl-diff.html,v
retrieving revision 1.6
retrieving revision 1.7
diff -u -b -r1.6 -r1.7
--- po/common-distros.pl-diff.html 21 Apr 2017 02:30:04 -0000 1.6
+++ po/common-distros.pl-diff.html 19 Jul 2017 15:59:11 -0000 1.7
@@ -11,7 +11,7 @@
</style></head>
<body><pre>
<!--#include virtual="/server/header.html" -->
-<!-- Parent-Version: <span
class="removed"><del><strong>1.77</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>1.79</em></ins></span> -->
+<!-- Parent-Version: <span
class="removed"><del><strong>1.79</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>1.83</em></ins></span> -->
<title>Explaining Why We Don't Endorse Other Systems - GNU Project -
Free Software Foundation</title>
<link rel="alternate" title="Free GNU/Linux distributions"
href="http://www.gnu.org/distros/distros.rss";
@@ -98,8 +98,8 @@
repository of nonfree software. According to the project, this
software is “not part of the Debian system,” but the
repository is hosted on many of the project's main servers, and people
-can readily <span class="removed"><del><strong>learn
about</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>find</em></ins></span> these nonfree packages by
browsing Debian's
-online package <span
class="removed"><del><strong>database.</p></strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>database and its wiki.</p></em></ins></span>
+can readily find these nonfree packages by browsing Debian's
+online package database and its wiki.</p>
<p>There is also a “contrib” repository; its packages are
free, but some of them exist to load separately distributed
@@ -113,8 +113,8 @@
the problem partly remains: the installer in some cases recommends
these nonfree firmware files for the peripherals on the machine.</p>
-<span class="inserted"><ins><em><p>Debian's wiki includes pages about
installng nonfree firmware.</p>
-<!-- https://wiki.debian.org/ATIProprietary --></em></ins></span>
+<p>Debian's wiki includes pages about <span
class="removed"><del><strong>installng</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>installing</em></ins></span> nonfree
firmware.</p>
+<!-- https://wiki.debian.org/ATIProprietary -->
<h3 id="Fedora">Fedora</h3>
@@ -208,20 +208,6 @@
to tell which ones are free</a> since proprietary programs for
download at no charge are labelled “free”.</p>
-<span class="removed"><del><strong><p>
-Since October 2012, Ubuntu
-<a
href="http://www.omgubuntu.co.uk/2012/10/does-ubuntus-amazon-lens-break-eu-law">
-sends personal data about users' searches</a> to a server belonging to
-Canonical, which sends back ads to buy things from Amazon. This does
-not, strictly speaking, affect whether Ubuntu is free software, but it
-is a violation of users' privacy. It also encourages buying from
-Amazon, a company <a href="http://DefectiveByDesign.org/">associated
-with DRM</a> as well as mistreatment of workers, authors and
publishers.</p>
-
-<p>This adware is one of the rare occasions in which a free software
-developer persists in keeping a malicious feature in its version of a
-free program.</p></strong></del></span>
-
<p>Ubuntu <a
href="http://www.ubuntu.com/legal/terms-and-policies/intellectual-property-policy#your-use-of-ubuntu">appears
to permit commercial redistribution of exact copies with the
trademarks</a>; removal of the trademarks is required only for
@@ -272,22 +258,23 @@
<p><a
href="/philosophy/android-and-users-freedom.html">Android</a> as
released by Google contains many nonfree parts as well as many free
parts. Most of the free parts are covered by a pushover license (not
-<a href="/copyleft/copyleft.html">copyleft</a>), so manufacturers
that
+<a <span
class="removed"><del><strong>href="/copyleft/copyleft.html">copyleft</a>),</strong></del></span>
<span
class="inserted"><ins><em>href="/licenses/copyleft.html">copyleft</a>),</em></ins></span>
so manufacturers that
distribute Android in a product sometimes make those parts nonfree as
well.</p>
-<h3 id="CyanogenMod">CyanogenMod</h3>
+<h3 <span
class="removed"><del><strong>id="CyanogenMod">CyanogenMod</h3>
+
+<p>This</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>id="LineageOS">LineageOS</h3>
-<p>This modified version of Android contains nonfree libraries.
-It also explains how to install the nonfree applications that Google
-distributes with Android.</p>
+<p>LineageOS (formerly CyanogenMod) is a</em></ins></span> modified
version of <span class="removed"><del><strong>Android</strong></del></span>
<span class="inserted"><ins><em>Android,
+which</em></ins></span> contains nonfree libraries. It also explains how to
install the
+nonfree applications that Google distributes with Android.</p>
<h3 id="ReactOS">ReactOS</h3>
<p>ReactOS is meant as a free binary compatible replacement for
-Windows. <span class="removed"><del><strong>Allowing people to continue using
the</strong></del></span> <span class="inserted"><ins><em>Use
with</em></ins></span> proprietary software and drivers meant for Windows
-is one of the stated goals of the
-<span class="removed"><del><strong>project. </p></strong></del></span>
<span class="inserted"><ins><em>project.</p></em></ins></span>
+Windows. Use with proprietary software and drivers meant for Windows
+is one of the stated goals of the project.</p>
</div><!-- for id="content", starts in the include above -->
<!--#include virtual="/server/footer.html" -->
@@ -336,7 +323,7 @@
There is more detail about copyright years in the GNU Maintainers
Information document, www.gnu.org/prep/maintain. -->
-<p>Copyright © 2014, <span
class="removed"><del><strong>2015</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>2015, 2016, 2017</em></ins></span> Free Software
Foundation, Inc.</p>
+<p>Copyright © 2014, 2015, 2016, 2017 Free Software Foundation,
Inc.</p>
<p>This page is licensed under a <a rel="license"
href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/">Creative
@@ -346,7 +333,7 @@
<p class="unprintable">Updated:
<!-- timestamp start -->
-$Date: 2017/04/21 02:30:04 $
+$Date: 2017/07/19 15:59:11 $
<!-- timestamp end -->
</p>
</div>
Index: po/common-distros.de-diff.html
===================================================================
RCS file: po/common-distros.de-diff.html
diff -N po/common-distros.de-diff.html
--- /dev/null 1 Jan 1970 00:00:00 -0000
+++ po/common-distros.de-diff.html 19 Jul 2017 15:59:11 -0000 1.1
@@ -0,0 +1,343 @@
+<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Strict//EN"
+ "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-strict.dtd";>
+<!-- Generated by GNUN -->
+<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"; xml:lang="en" lang="en">
+<head>
+<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8" />
+<title>/distros/common-distros.html-diff</title>
+<style type="text/css">
+span.removed { background-color: #f22; color: #000; }
+span.inserted { background-color: #2f2; color: #000; }
+</style></head>
+<body><pre>
+<!--#include virtual="/server/header.html" -->
+<!-- Parent-Version: <span
class="removed"><del><strong>1.79</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>1.83</em></ins></span> -->
+<title>Explaining Why We Don't Endorse Other Systems - GNU Project -
Free Software Foundation</title>
+<link rel="alternate" title="Free GNU/Linux distributions"
+ href="http://www.gnu.org/distros/distros.rss";
+ type="application/rss+xml" />
+<!--#include virtual="/distros/po/common-distros.translist" -->
+<!--#include virtual="/server/banner.html" -->
+<h2>Explaining Why We Don't Endorse Other Systems</h2>
+<!--#include virtual="/licenses/fsf-licensing.html" -->
+
+<p>We're often asked why we don't endorse a particular
+system—usually a popular GNU/Linux distribution. The short
+answer to that question is that they don't follow
+the <a href="/distros/free-system-distribution-guidelines.html">free
+system distribution guidelines</a>. But since it isn't always obvious
+how a particular system fails to follow the guidelines, this list
+gives more information about the problems of certain well-known
+nonfree system distros.</p>
+
+<p>To learn more about the GNU/Linux systems that we do endorse, check
+out our list of <a href="/distros/free-distros.html">free GNU/Linux
+distributions</a>.</p>
+
+<p>Except where noted, all of the distributions listed on this page
+fail to follow the guidelines in at least two important ways:</p>
+
+<ul>
+<li><p>They do not have a policy of <em>only</em>
including free
+software, and removing nonfree software if it is discovered. Most of
+them have no clear policy on what software they'll accept or reject at
+all. The distributions that do have a policy unfortunately aren't
+strict enough, as explained below.</p></li>
+<li><p>The kernel that they distribute (in most cases, Linux)
includes
+“blobs”: pieces of object code distributed without source,
+usually firmware to run some device.</p></li>
+</ul>
+
+<p>Here is a list of some popular nonfree GNU/Linux distributions in
+alphabetical order, with brief notes about how they fall short. We do
+not aim for completeness; once we know some reasons we can't endorse a
+certain distro, we do not keep looking for all the reasons.
+</p>
+
+<p>A distro may have changed since we last updated information about
+it; if you think one of the problems mentioned here has been
+corrected, please <a href="mailto:address@hidden">let us know</a>.
+However, we will study and endorse a distro only if its developers ask
+for our endorsement.</p>
+
+<!-- Please keep this list sorted, first with all the GNU systems
+ alphabetically, then all the non-GNU systems alphabetically. -->
+
+<h3 id="Arch">Arch GNU/Linux</h3>
+
+<p>Arch has the two usual problems: there's no clear policy
+about what software can be included, and nonfree blobs are shipped with
+their kernel, Linux. Arch also has no policy about not distributing
+nonfree software through their normal channels.</p>
+
+<h3 id="Canaima">Canaima</h3>
+
+<p>Canaima GNU/Linux is a distribution made by Venezuela's government
+to distribute computers with GNU/Linux. While the overall plan is
+admirable, Canaima is flawed by the inclusion of nonfree software.</p>
+
+<p>Its main menu has an option, “Install nonfree
+software”, which installs all the nonfree drivers (even the
+ones that are not necessary). The distro also provides blobs for the
+kernel, Linux, and invites installing nonfree applications including
+Flash Player.</p>
+
+<h3 id="CentOS">CentOS</h3>
+
+<p>We're not aware of problems in CentOS aside from the two usual ones:
+there's no clear policy about what software can be included,
+and nonfree blobs are shipped with Linux, the kernel. Of course, with
+no firm policy in place, there might be other nonfree software
+included that we missed.</p>
+
+<h3 id="Debian">Debian GNU/Linux</h3>
+
+<p>Debian's Social Contract states the goal of making Debian entirely
+free software, and Debian conscientiously keeps nonfree software out
+of the official Debian system. However, Debian also provides a
+repository of nonfree software. According to the project, this
+software is “not part of the Debian system,” but the
+repository is hosted on many of the project's main servers, and people
+can readily find these nonfree packages by browsing Debian's
+online package database and its wiki.</p>
+
+<p>There is also a “contrib” repository; its packages are
+free, but some of them exist to load separately distributed
+proprietary programs. This too is not thoroughly separated from the
+main Debian distribution.</p>
+
+<p>Previous releases of Debian included nonfree blobs with Linux, the
+kernel. With the release of Debian 6.0 (“squeeze”) in
+February 2011, these blobs have been moved out of the main
+distribution to separate packages in the nonfree repository. However,
+the problem partly remains: the installer in some cases recommends
+these nonfree firmware files for the peripherals on the machine.</p>
+
+<p>Debian's wiki includes pages about <span
class="removed"><del><strong>installng</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>installing</em></ins></span> nonfree
firmware.</p>
+<!-- https://wiki.debian.org/ATIProprietary -->
+
+<h3 id="Fedora">Fedora</h3>
+
+<p>Fedora does have a clear policy about what can be included in the
+distribution, and it seems to be followed carefully. The policy
+requires that most software and all fonts be available under a free
+license, but makes an exception for certain kinds of nonfree firmware.
+Unfortunately, the decision to allow that firmware in the policy keeps
+Fedora from meeting the free system distribution guidelines.</p>
+
+<h3 id="Gentoo">Gentoo GNU/Linux</h3>
+
+<p>Gentoo includes installation recipes for a number of nonfree
+programs in its primary package system.</p>
+
+<h3 id="Mandriva">Mandriva GNU/Linux</h3>
+
+<p>Mandriva does have a stated policy about what can be included in the
+main system. It's based on Fedora's, which means that it also allows
+certain kinds of nonfree firmware to be included. On top of that, it
+permits software released under the original Artistic License to be
+included, even though that's a nonfree license.</p>
+
+<p>Mandriva also provides nonfree software through dedicated
+repositories.</p>
+
+<h3 id="Mint">Mint GNU/Linux</h3>
+
+<p>Mint does not have a policy against including nonfree software, it
+includes nonfree binary blobs in drivers packaged with the kernel, and
+it includes nonfree programs in its repositories. It even includes
+proprietary codecs.</p>
+
+<h3 id="openSUSE">openSUSE</h3>
+
+<p>openSUSE offers a repository of nonfree software. This is an
+instance of
+how <a href="/philosophy/open-source-misses-the-point.html">
+“open” is weaker than “free”</a>.</p>
+
+<h3 id="RedHat">Red Hat GNU/Linux</h3>
+
+<p>Red Hat's enterprise distribution primarily follows the same
+licensing policies as Fedora, with one exception. Thus, we don't
+endorse it for <a href="#Fedora">the same reasons</a>. In
addition to
+those, Red Hat has no policy against making nonfree software available
+for the system through supplementary distribution channels.</p>
+
+<h3 id="Slackware">Slackware</h3>
+
+<p>Slackware has the two usual problems: there's no clear policy about
+what software can be included, and nonfree blobs are included in
+Linux, the kernel. It also ships with the nonfree image-viewing
+program xv. Of course, with no firm policy against them, more nonfree
+programs could get in at any time. There is an
+<a href="http://freeslack.net/">unofficial list</a> of nonfree
software
+in Slackware.</p>
+
+<h3 id="SteamOS">SteamOS</h3>
+
+<p>SteamOS, a version of GNU/Linux to be distributed by Valve. It
+contains proprietary software, including the Steam client and
+proprietary drivers. Steam uses <a
+href="https://www.defectivebydesign.org/what_is_drm">Digital
+Restrictions Management (DRM)</a> to impose restrictions on the
+software it distributes, as well as on the proprietary software it
+promotes via the Steam store.</p>
+
+<h3 id="SUSE">SUSE GNU/Linux Enterprise</h3>
+
+<p>In addition to the usual two problems, several nonfree software
+programs are available for download from SUSE's official FTP site.</p>
+
+<h3 id="Tails">Tails</h3>
+
+<p>Tails uses the vanilla version of Linux, which contains nonfree
+firmware blobs.</p>
+
+<h3 id="Ubuntu">Ubuntu GNU/Linux</h3>
+
+<p>Ubuntu provides specific repositories of nonfree software, and
+Canonical expressly promotes and recommends nonfree software under the
+Ubuntu name in some of their distribution channels. Ubuntu offers the
+option to install only free packages, which means it also offers the
+option to install nonfree packages too. In addition, the version of
+Linux, the kernel, included in Ubuntu contains firmware blobs.</p>
+
+<p>The “Ubuntu Software Center” lists proprietary programs
+and free programs jumbled together. It
+is <a
href="http://www.freesoftwaremagazine.com/articles/ubuntu_software_center_proprietary_and_free_software_mixed_confusing_ui">hard
+to tell which ones are free</a> since proprietary programs for
+download at no charge are labelled “free”.</p>
+
+<p>Ubuntu <a
href="http://www.ubuntu.com/legal/terms-and-policies/intellectual-property-policy#your-use-of-ubuntu">appears
+to permit commercial redistribution of exact copies with the
+trademarks</a>; removal of the trademarks is required only for
+modified versions. That is an acceptable policy for trademarks. The
+same page, further down, makes a vague and ominous statement about
+“Ubuntu patents,” without giving enough details to show
+whether that constitutes aggression or not.</p>
+
+<p>That page spreads confusion by using the misleading
+term <a href="/philosophy/not-ipr.html">“intellectual property
+rights”</a>, which falsely presumes that trademark law and patent
law
+and several other laws belong in one single conceptual framework. Use
+of that term is harmful, without exception, so after making a
+reference to someone else's use of the term, we should always reject
+it. However, that is not a substantive issue about Ubuntu as a
+GNU/Linux distribution.</p>
+
+<h2>Some Other Distros</h2>
+
+<p>Here we discuss some well-known or significant non-GNU/Linux system
+distros that do not qualify as free.</p>
+
+<h3 id="BSD">BSD systems</h3>
+
+<p>FreeBSD, NetBSD, and OpenBSD all include instructions for obtaining
+nonfree programs in their ports system. In addition, their kernels
+include nonfree firmware blobs.</p>
+
+<p>Nonfree firmware programs used with Linux, the kernel, are called
+“blobs”, and that's how we use the term. In BSD parlance,
+the term “blob” means something else: a nonfree driver.
+OpenBSD and perhaps other BSD distributions (called “projects” by
BSD
+developers) have the policy of not including those. That is the right
+policy, as regards drivers; but when the developers say these distributions
+“contain no blobs”, it causes a misunderstanding. They are not
+talking about firmware blobs.</p>
+
+<p>No BSD distribution has policies against proprietary binary-only
+firmware that might be loaded even by free drivers.</p>
+
+<h3 id="Haiku">Haiku</h3>
+
+<p>Haiku includes some software that you're not allowed to modify. It
+also includes nonfree firmware blobs.</p>
+
+<h3 id="Android">Android</h3>
+
+<p><a
href="/philosophy/android-and-users-freedom.html">Android</a> as
+released by Google contains many nonfree parts as well as many free
+parts. Most of the free parts are covered by a pushover license (not
+<a <span
class="removed"><del><strong>href="/copyleft/copyleft.html">copyleft</a>),</strong></del></span>
<span
class="inserted"><ins><em>href="/licenses/copyleft.html">copyleft</a>),</em></ins></span>
so manufacturers that
+distribute Android in a product sometimes make those parts nonfree as
+well.</p>
+
+<h3 <span
class="removed"><del><strong>id="CyanogenMod">CyanogenMod</h3>
+
+<p>This</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>id="LineageOS">LineageOS</h3>
+
+<p>LineageOS (formerly CyanogenMod) is a</em></ins></span> modified
version of <span class="removed"><del><strong>Android</strong></del></span>
<span class="inserted"><ins><em>Android,
+which</em></ins></span> contains nonfree libraries. It also explains how to
install the
+nonfree applications that Google distributes with Android.</p>
+
+<h3 id="ReactOS">ReactOS</h3>
+
+<p>ReactOS is meant as a free binary compatible replacement for
+Windows. Use with proprietary software and drivers meant for Windows
+is one of the stated goals of the project.</p>
+
+</div><!-- for id="content", starts in the include above -->
+<!--#include virtual="/server/footer.html" -->
+<div id="footer">
+<div class="unprintable">
+
+<p>Please send general FSF & GNU inquiries to
+<a href="mailto:address@hidden"><address@hidden></a>.
+There are also <a href="/contact/">other ways to contact</a>
+the FSF. Broken links and other corrections or suggestions can be sent
+to <a
href="mailto:address@hidden"><address@hidden></a>.</p>
+
+<p><!-- TRANSLATORS: Ignore the original text in this paragraph,
+ replace it with the translation of these two:
+
+ We work hard and do our best to provide accurate, good quality
+ translations. However, we are not exempt from imperfection.
+ Please send your comments and general suggestions in this regard
+ to <a href="mailto:address@hidden">
+ <address@hidden></a>.</p>
+
+ <p>For information on coordinating and submitting translations of
+ our web pages, see <a
+ href="/server/standards/README.translations.html">Translations
+ README</a>. -->
+Please see the <a
+href="/server/standards/README.translations.html">Translations
+README</a> for information on coordinating and submitting translations
+of this article.</p>
+</div>
+
+<!-- Regarding copyright, in general, standalone pages (as opposed to
+ files generated as part of manuals) on the GNU web server should
+ be under CC BY-ND 4.0. Please do NOT change or remove this
+ without talking with the webmasters or licensing team first.
+ Please make sure the copyright date is consistent with the
+ document. For web pages, it is ok to list just the latest year the
+ document was modified, or published.
+
+ If you wish to list earlier years, that is ok too.
+ Either "2001, 2002, 2003" or "2001-2003" are ok for specifying
+ years, as long as each year in the range is in fact a copyrightable
+ year, i.e., a year in which the document was published (including
+ being publicly visible on the web or in a revision control system).
+
+ There is more detail about copyright years in the GNU Maintainers
+ Information document, www.gnu.org/prep/maintain. -->
+
+<p>Copyright © 2014, 2015, 2016, 2017 Free Software Foundation,
Inc.</p>
+
+<p>This page is licensed under a <a rel="license"
+href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/">Creative
+Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
License</a>.</p>
+
+<!--#include virtual="/server/bottom-notes.html" -->
+
+<p class="unprintable">Updated:
+<!-- timestamp start -->
+$Date: 2017/07/19 15:59:11 $
+<!-- timestamp end -->
+</p>
+</div>
+</div>
+</body>
+</html>
+</pre></body></html>
| [Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread] |
- www/distros common-distros.de.html common-distr...,
GNUN <=