[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
www/proprietary proprietary-insecurity.html
From: |
Richard M. Stallman |
Subject: |
www/proprietary proprietary-insecurity.html |
Date: |
Sun, 30 Apr 2017 18:01:56 -0400 (EDT) |
CVSROOT: /web/www
Module name: www
Changes by: Richard M. Stallman <rms> 17/04/30 18:01:56
Modified files:
proprietary : proprietary-insecurity.html
Log message:
Rewrite initial intro.
CVSWeb URLs:
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/proprietary/proprietary-insecurity.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.52&r2=1.53
Patches:
Index: proprietary-insecurity.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/proprietary/proprietary-insecurity.html,v
retrieving revision 1.52
retrieving revision 1.53
diff -u -b -r1.52 -r1.53
--- proprietary-insecurity.html 13 Apr 2017 22:36:56 -0000 1.52
+++ proprietary-insecurity.html 30 Apr 2017 22:01:54 -0000 1.53
@@ -19,12 +19,20 @@
proprietary software that has grave consequences or is otherwise
noteworthy.</p>
-<p>It would be incorrect to compare proprietary software with a
-fictitious idea of free software as perfect. Every nontrivial program
-has bugs, and any system, free or proprietary, may have security
-holes. That in itself is not culpable. But proprietary software
-developers frequently disregard gaping holes, or even introduce them
-deliberately, and <em>the users are helpless to fix them</em>.</p>
+<p>It is incorrect to compare free software with a fictitious idea of
+proprietary software as perfect, but the press often implicitly does
+that whenever a security hole in a free program is discovered. The
+examples below show that proprietary software isn't perfect, and
+is often quite sloppy.</p>
+
+<p>It would be equally incorrect to compare proprietary software with
+a fictitious idea of free software as perfect. Every nontrivial
+program has bugs, and any system, free or proprietary, may have
+security errors. To err is human, and not culpable. But proprietary
+software developers frequently disregard gaping holes, or even
+introduce them deliberately. In any case, they keep users <em>the
+helpless to fix these problems</em>. Keeping the users helpless is
+what's culpable about proprietary software.</p>
<ul>
<li>
@@ -448,7 +456,7 @@
<p class="unprintable">Updated:
<!-- timestamp start -->
-$Date: 2017/04/13 22:36:56 $
+$Date: 2017/04/30 22:01:54 $
<!-- timestamp end -->
</p>
</div>