www/philosophy not-ipr.es.html po/not-ipr.es-en...

[GNUN]

CVSROOT:        /web/www
Module name:    www
Changes by:     GNUN <gnun>     17/03/21 07:59:50

Modified files:
        philosophy     : not-ipr.es.html 
        philosophy/po  : not-ipr.es-en.html 

Log message:
        Automatic update by GNUnited Nations.

CVSWeb URLs:
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/not-ipr.es.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.46&r2=1.47
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/po/not-ipr.es-en.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.29&r2=1.30

Patches:
Index: not-ipr.es.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/not-ipr.es.html,v
retrieving revision 1.46
retrieving revision 1.47
diff -u -b -r1.46 -r1.47
--- not-ipr.es.html     9 Mar 2017 09:00:03 -0000       1.46
+++ not-ipr.es.html     21 Mar 2017 11:59:50 -0000      1.47
@@ -222,6 +222,16 @@
 </p>
 
 <p>
+El rechazo de la «propiedad intelectual» no es un mero entretenimiento
+filosófico. Esa expresión hace auténtico daño. Apple la ha utilizado para 
<a
+href="https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2017/mar/11/nebraska-farmers-right-to-repair-bill-stalls-apple";>distorsionar
+el debate en torno a la ley de Nebraska sobre el «derecho a
+reparar»</a>. Este falaz concepto le permitió a Apple disfrazar su
+preferencia por el secretismo, que entra en conflicto con los derechos de
+sus consumidores, como un supuesto principio al que los consumidores y el
+Estado deben someterse.</p>
+
+<p>
 Si quiere pensar con claridad sobre las cuestiones suscitadas por las
 patentes, el copyright o las marcas comerciales, el primer paso es olvidar
 la idea de agruparlas, debe tratarlas como asuntos separados. El segundo
@@ -338,7 +348,7 @@
 <p class="unprintable"><!-- timestamp start -->
 Última actualización:
 
-$Date: 2017/03/09 09:00:03 $
+$Date: 2017/03/21 11:59:50 $
 
 <!-- timestamp end -->
 </p>

Index: po/not-ipr.es-en.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/po/not-ipr.es-en.html,v
retrieving revision 1.29
retrieving revision 1.30
diff -u -b -r1.29 -r1.30
--- po/not-ipr.es-en.html       9 Mar 2017 09:00:03 -0000       1.29
+++ po/not-ipr.es-en.html       21 Mar 2017 11:59:50 -0000      1.30
@@ -207,6 +207,15 @@
 </p>
 
 <p>
+Rejection of &ldquo;intellectual property&rdquo; is not mere
+philosophical recreation.  The term does real harm.  Apple used it
+to <a 
href="https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2017/mar/11/nebraska-farmers-right-to-repair-bill-stalls-apple";>warp
 debate about Nebraska's
+&ldquo;right to repair&rdquo; bill</a>.  The bogus concept gave
+Apple a way to dress up its preference for secrecy, which conficts
+with its customers' rights, as a supposed principle that customers
+and the state must yield to.</p>
+
+<p>
 If you want to think clearly about the issues raised by patents, or
 copyrights, or trademarks, or various other different laws, the first
 step is to
@@ -303,7 +312,7 @@
 
 <p class="unprintable">Updated:
 <!-- timestamp start -->
-$Date: 2017/03/09 09:00:03 $
+$Date: 2017/03/21 11:59:50 $
 <!-- timestamp end -->
 </p>
 </div>