www/philosophy/po rms-patents.pot

[GNUN]

CVSROOT:        /web/www
Module name:    www
Changes by:     GNUN <gnun>     16/09/10 18:28:06

Modified files:
        philosophy/po  : rms-patents.pot 

Log message:
        Automatic update by GNUnited Nations.

CVSWeb URLs:
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/po/rms-patents.pot?cvsroot=www&r1=1.1&r2=1.2

Patches:
Index: rms-patents.pot
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/po/rms-patents.pot,v
retrieving revision 1.1
retrieving revision 1.2
diff -u -b -r1.1 -r1.2
--- rms-patents.pot     21 Jul 2016 06:30:01 -0000      1.1
+++ rms-patents.pot     10 Sep 2016 18:28:05 -0000      1.2
@@ -7,7 +7,7 @@
 msgid ""
 msgstr ""
 "Project-Id-Version: rms-patents.html\n"
-"POT-Creation-Date: 2016-07-21 06:25+0000\n"
+"POT-Creation-Date: 2016-09-10 18:25+0000\n"
 "PO-Revision-Date: YEAR-MO-DA HO:MI+ZONE\n"
 "Last-Translator: FULL NAME <address@hidden>\n"
 "Language-Team: LANGUAGE <address@hidden>\n"
@@ -31,14 +31,11 @@
 msgstr ""
 
 #. type: Content of: <p>
-msgid "Locatelli Center, Santa Clara University, November, 2012"
-msgstr ""
-
-#. type: Content of: <p>
 msgid ""
-"<a href=\"//audio-video.gnu.org/video/keynote-what-is-the-problem.webm\"> "
-"Video</a> is available at <a href=\"//audio-video.gnu.org/\">GNU audio/video "
-"page</a>."
+"<em>Speech given at the Locatelli Center, Santa Clara University, in "
+"November 2012</em>&nbsp; (<a "
+"href=\"//audio-video.gnu.org/video/keynote-what-is-the-problem.webm\">video</a>,
 "
+"&nbsp;<a href=\"//audio-video.gnu.org/video/#2012\">metadata</a>)"
 msgstr ""
 
 #. type: Content of: <p>
@@ -141,14 +138,19 @@
 "at all like what copyrights do.  An analogy is a good way to do this.  What "
 "can you say about programs? Well, they're large works, full of details that "
 "all have to work together to get the desired result.  Well, what else is "
-"there like that? A novel, or a symphony.  So, imagine if the governments of "
-"Europe in the 1700s had had the cockeyed idea of promoting the progress of "
-"symphonic music with a system of &ldquo;musical idea patents.&rdquo; So, any "
-"musical idea statable in words could have been patented.  A melodic motif "
-"could have been patented, or a series of chords, or a rhythmic pattern, or a "
-"pattern of repetitions in a movement, or the use of certain instruments "
-"while the rest of the orchestra is silent and a bunch of other musical ideas "
-"that I can't think of, but maybe a composer would."
+"there like that? A novel, or a symphony."
+msgstr ""
+
+#. type: Content of: <p>
+msgid ""
+"So, imagine if the governments of Europe in the 1700s had had the cockeyed "
+"idea of promoting the progress of symphonic music with a system of "
+"&ldquo;musical idea patents.&rdquo; So, any musical idea statable in words "
+"could have been patented.  A melodic motif could have been patented, or a "
+"series of chords, or a rhythmic pattern, or a pattern of repetitions in a "
+"movement, or the use of certain instruments while the rest of the orchestra "
+"is silent and a bunch of other musical ideas that I can't think of, but "
+"maybe a composer would."
 msgstr ""
 
 #. type: Content of: <p>
@@ -158,14 +160,19 @@
 "you don't get sued for than to write a good symphony.  Now, you'd probably "
 "have complained, and the patent holders would have said &ldquo;Oh, "
 "Beethoven, you're just jealous because we had these ideas before you.  Why "
-"don't you go think of some ideas of your own?&rdquo; Of course, Beethoven is "
-"considered a great composer because he had lots of new ideas, and not only "
-"that, he knew how to use them effectively.  And that is: combined with lots "
-"of familiar ideas, so that his pieces were merely shocking for a while, but "
-"people could get used to them.  They were not so alien and incomprehensible "
-"that they got rejected.  They shocked people for a while, people got used to "
-"them, and now we don't see what's shocking any more, because we're used to "
-"those ideas.  Well, that's the proof that he used those ideas well."
+"don't you go think of some ideas of your own?&rdquo;"
+msgstr ""
+
+#. type: Content of: <p>
+msgid ""
+"Of course, Beethoven is considered a great composer because he had lots of "
+"new ideas, and not only that, he knew how to use them effectively.  And that "
+"is: combined with lots of familiar ideas, so that his pieces were merely "
+"shocking for a while, but people could get used to them.  They were not so "
+"alien and incomprehensible that they got rejected.  They shocked people for "
+"a while, people got used to them, and now we don't see what's shocking any "
+"more, because we're used to those ideas.  Well, that's the proof that he "
+"used those ideas well."
 msgstr ""
 
 #. type: Content of: <p>
@@ -240,13 +247,17 @@
 "for a system, a method of curing rubber.  The implementation involved a "
 "computer, but it also involved special purpose hardware, not a general "
 "purpose universal machine, and that special purpose hardware was crucial to "
-"carrying out the patented technique.  It wasn't actually a software "
-"technique.  And, actually, I read an article by Pamela Samuelson arguing "
-"that the CAFC twisted that decision and basically got the quantifiers in the "
-"wrong order.  That the Supreme Court said, &ldquo;the fact that there's a "
-"computer in there somewhere doesn't automatically make it "
-"non-patentable,&rdquo; and the CAFC twisted that into &ldquo;the computer "
-"makes it patentable.&rdquo;"
+"carrying out the patented technique."
+msgstr ""
+
+#. type: Content of: <p>
+msgid ""
+"It wasn't actually a software technique.  And, actually, I read an article "
+"by Pamela Samuelson arguing that the CAFC twisted that decision and "
+"basically got the quantifiers in the wrong order.  That the Supreme Court "
+"said, &ldquo;the fact that there's a computer in there somewhere doesn't "
+"automatically make it non-patentable,&rdquo; and the CAFC twisted that into "
+"&ldquo;the computer makes it patentable.&rdquo;"
 msgstr ""
 
 #. type: Content of: <p>
@@ -258,15 +269,20 @@
 "up with was: &ldquo;software running on generally used computing "
 "hardware.&rdquo; We certainly want things like smartphones to be covered; we "
 "don't want it to exclude anything that has any kind of special-purpose "
-"hardware in there.  The portable phone obviously has specialised hardware to "
-"talk to the phone network, but that shouldn't automatically mean that if "
-"it's running on a portable phone, it's vulnerable to patents.  Because that "
-"is a general purpose computer and people use it for all sorts of things.  "
-"But my words, &ldquo;generally used computing hardware,&rdquo; they may not "
-"be the best possible words.  This is a subject that I think calls for study, "
-"because we've got to look at each possible wording that might be used and "
-"see which cases would be protected from patents and which would be exposed "
-"to come up with the right method."
+"hardware in there."
+msgstr ""
+
+#. type: Content of: <p>
+msgid ""
+"The portable phone obviously has specialised hardware to talk to the phone "
+"network, but that shouldn't automatically mean that if it's running on a "
+"portable phone, it's vulnerable to patents.  Because that is a general "
+"purpose computer and people use it for all sorts of things.  But my words, "
+"&ldquo;generally used computing hardware,&rdquo; they may not be the best "
+"possible words.  This is a subject that I think calls for study, because "
+"we've got to look at each possible wording that might be used and see which "
+"cases would be protected from patents and which would be exposed to come up "
+"with the right method."
 msgstr ""
 
 #. type: Content of: <p>
@@ -276,13 +292,17 @@
 "solving the problem shocks people because it strikes them as radical.  They "
 "think &ldquo;I can't advocate something so radical as to really solve this "
 "whole problem.  I've got to look for some partial solution that will only "
-"protect some software developers.&rdquo; Well, that's a mistake.  It's a "
-"mistake a) because it wouldn't do the whole job, but b) because it would be "
-"harder to get it passed.  There are lots of software developers and they are "
-"all threatened and if we propose to protect them all, they will all have a "
-"reason to support it.  But if we propose to only protect some of them, the "
-"rest will say &ldquo;well, this doesn't do me any good, why should I "
-"care?&rdquo;"
+"protect some software developers.&rdquo;"
+msgstr ""
+
+#. type: Content of: <p>
+msgid ""
+"Well, that's a mistake.  It's a mistake a) because it wouldn't do the whole "
+"job, but b) because it would be harder to get it passed.  There are lots of "
+"software developers and they are all threatened and if we propose to protect "
+"them all, they will all have a reason to support it.  But if we propose to "
+"only protect some of them, the rest will say &ldquo;well, this doesn't do me "
+"any good, why should I care?&rdquo;"
 msgstr ""
 
 #. type: Content of: <p>
@@ -293,12 +313,17 @@
 "boundaries if you give them any kind of boundary that they can stretch.  And "
 "this, by the way, is another advantage of applying a change to suing people, "
 "rather than to what's patentable.  Because there, the criteria are just "
-"&ldquo;what kind of situation is this?&rdquo; It's harder to stretch those, "
-"and if they tried, it would always be in a case against somebody who's going "
-"to be fighting not to stretch it.  So it's less vulnerable to being "
-"distorted from an intended restriction of substance into an actual "
-"requirement of form of patent applications, which tends to happen to any "
-"kind of requirement about what patent applications have to look like."
+"&ldquo;what kind of situation is this?&rdquo;"
+msgstr ""
+
+#. type: Content of: <p>
+msgid ""
+"It's harder to stretch those, and if they tried, it would always be in a "
+"case against somebody who's going to be fighting not to stretch it.  So it's "
+"less vulnerable to being distorted from an intended restriction of substance "
+"into an actual requirement of form of patent applications, which tends to "
+"happen to any kind of requirement about what patent applications have to "
+"look like."
 msgstr ""
 
 #. type: Content of: <p>