[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
www/proprietary malware-mobiles.html proprietar...
From: |
Pavel Kharitonov |
Subject: |
www/proprietary malware-mobiles.html proprietar... |
Date: |
Tue, 24 Nov 2015 14:43:38 +0000 |
CVSROOT: /web/www
Module name: www
Changes by: Pavel Kharitonov <ineiev> 15/11/24 14:43:38
Modified files:
proprietary : malware-mobiles.html
proprietary-surveillance.html
Log message:
<mobile surveillance>: New entry RT #1063468.
CVSWeb URLs:
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/proprietary/malware-mobiles.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.6&r2=1.7
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/proprietary/proprietary-surveillance.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.24&r2=1.25
Patches:
Index: malware-mobiles.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/proprietary/malware-mobiles.html,v
retrieving revision 1.6
retrieving revision 1.7
diff -u -b -r1.6 -r1.7
--- malware-mobiles.html 29 Jun 2015 08:08:35 -0000 1.6
+++ malware-mobiles.html 24 Nov 2015 14:43:37 -0000 1.7
@@ -119,6 +119,20 @@
<h3 id="surveillance">Mobile Surveillance</h3>
<ul>
+ <li><p>“Cryptic communication,” unrelated to the app's
functionality,
+ was <a
href="http://news.mit.edu/2015/data-transferred-android-apps-hiding-1119">
+ found in the 500 most popular gratis Android apps</a>.</p>
+
+ <p>The article should not have described these apps as
+ “free”—they are not free software. The clear way to say
+ “zero price” is “gratis.”</p>
+
+ <p>The article takes for granted that the usual analytics tools are
+ legitimate, but is that valid? Software developers have no right to
+ analyze what users are doing or how. “Analytics” tools that
snoop are
+ just as wrong as any other snooping.</p>
+ </li>
+
<li><p>Many proprietary apps for mobile devices report which other
apps the user has
installed. <a
href="http://techcrunch.com/2014/11/26/twitter-app-graph/">Twitter
@@ -240,7 +254,7 @@
<p class="unprintable">Updated:
<!-- timestamp start -->
-$Date: 2015/06/29 08:08:35 $
+$Date: 2015/11/24 14:43:37 $
<!-- timestamp end -->
</p>
</div>
Index: proprietary-surveillance.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/proprietary/proprietary-surveillance.html,v
retrieving revision 1.24
retrieving revision 1.25
diff -u -b -r1.24 -r1.25
--- proprietary-surveillance.html 17 Nov 2015 13:45:16 -0000 1.24
+++ proprietary-surveillance.html 24 Nov 2015 14:43:37 -0000 1.25
@@ -216,6 +216,19 @@
</div>
<ul>
+ <li><p>“Cryptic communication,” unrelated to the app's
functionality,
+ was <a
href="http://news.mit.edu/2015/data-transferred-android-apps-hiding-1119">
+ found in the 500 most popular gratis Android apps</a>.</p>
+
+ <p>The article should not have described these apps as
+ “free”—they are not free software. The clear way to say
+ “zero price” is “gratis.”</p>
+
+ <p>The article takes for granted that the usual analytics tools are
+ legitimate, but is that valid? Software developers have no right to
+ analyze what users are doing or how. “Analytics” tools that
snoop are
+ just as wrong as any other snooping.</p>
+ </li>
<li><p>Gratis Android apps (but not <a href="/philosophy/free-sw.html">free
software</a>)
connect to 100
<a
href="http://www.theguardian.com/technology/2015/may/06/free-android-apps-connect-tracking-advertising-websites">tracking
and advertising</a> URLs,
@@ -781,7 +794,7 @@
<p class="unprintable">Updated:
<!-- timestamp start -->
-$Date: 2015/11/17 13:45:16 $
+$Date: 2015/11/24 14:43:37 $
<!-- timestamp end -->
</p>
</div>
[Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread] |
- www/proprietary malware-mobiles.html proprietar...,
Pavel Kharitonov <=