[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
www/philosophy/po words-to-avoid.ar-diff.html w...
|
From: |
GNUN |
|
Subject: |
www/philosophy/po words-to-avoid.ar-diff.html w... |
|
Date: |
Mon, 22 Jun 2015 07:42:55 +0000 |
CVSROOT: /web/www
Module name: www
Changes by: GNUN <gnun> 15/06/22 07:42:55
Modified files:
philosophy/po : words-to-avoid.ar-diff.html
words-to-avoid.ar.po words-to-avoid.de.po
words-to-avoid.es.po words-to-avoid.fr.po
words-to-avoid.it.po words-to-avoid.ja.po
words-to-avoid.pot words-to-avoid.ru.po
words-to-avoid.sq.po words-to-avoid.sr.po
words-to-avoid.tr.po
Log message:
Automatic update by GNUnited Nations.
CVSWeb URLs:
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/po/words-to-avoid.ar-diff.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.56&r2=1.57
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/po/words-to-avoid.ar.po?cvsroot=www&r1=1.84&r2=1.85
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/po/words-to-avoid.de.po?cvsroot=www&r1=1.123&r2=1.124
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/po/words-to-avoid.es.po?cvsroot=www&r1=1.195&r2=1.196
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/po/words-to-avoid.fr.po?cvsroot=www&r1=1.199&r2=1.200
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/po/words-to-avoid.it.po?cvsroot=www&r1=1.161&r2=1.162
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/po/words-to-avoid.ja.po?cvsroot=www&r1=1.100&r2=1.101
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/po/words-to-avoid.pot?cvsroot=www&r1=1.96&r2=1.97
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/po/words-to-avoid.ru.po?cvsroot=www&r1=1.125&r2=1.126
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/po/words-to-avoid.sq.po?cvsroot=www&r1=1.50&r2=1.51
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/po/words-to-avoid.sr.po?cvsroot=www&r1=1.104&r2=1.105
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/po/words-to-avoid.tr.po?cvsroot=www&r1=1.77&r2=1.78
Patches:
Index: words-to-avoid.ar-diff.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/po/words-to-avoid.ar-diff.html,v
retrieving revision 1.56
retrieving revision 1.57
diff -u -b -r1.56 -r1.57
--- words-to-avoid.ar-diff.html 21 Jun 2015 14:31:01 -0000 1.56
+++ words-to-avoid.ar-diff.html 22 Jun 2015 07:42:47 -0000 1.57
@@ -412,7 +412,7 @@
Why is this perverse usage spreading? Some may feel that the term
sounds sophisticated; if that attracts you, rejecting it with cogent
reasons can appear even more sophisticated. Others may be acting from
-business interests (their own, or their employers’). Their use
+business interests (their own, or their employers'). Their use
of the term in prestigious forums gives the impression that it's the
“correct” term.</p>
@@ -440,7 +440,7 @@
from
<span class="removed"><del><strong>economic theory, and bring with them its
narrow perspective and
misguided assumptions. These tend</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>the idea that using the program
“consumes” the program (see
-<a href="Consume">the previous entry</a>), which leads
people</em></ins></span> to <span class="removed"><del><strong>warp your
thinking.</p></strong></del></span>
+<a href="#Consume">the previous entry</a>), which leads
people</em></ins></span> to <span class="removed"><del><strong>warp your
thinking.</p></strong></del></span>
<span class="inserted"><ins><em>impose on copiable digital works the economic
conclusions that were
drawn about uncopiable material products.</p></em></ins></span>
<p>
@@ -1293,7 +1293,7 @@
<span class="inserted"><ins><em><p
class="unprintable">Updated:</em></ins></span>
<!-- timestamp start -->
-$Date: 2015/06/21 14:31:01 $
+$Date: 2015/06/22 07:42:47 $
<!-- timestamp end -->
</p>
</div>
Index: words-to-avoid.ar.po
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/po/words-to-avoid.ar.po,v
retrieving revision 1.84
retrieving revision 1.85
diff -u -b -r1.84 -r1.85
--- words-to-avoid.ar.po 21 Jun 2015 14:31:01 -0000 1.84
+++ words-to-avoid.ar.po 22 Jun 2015 07:42:48 -0000 1.85
@@ -9,7 +9,7 @@
msgid ""
msgstr ""
"Project-Id-Version: words-to-avoid.html\n"
-"POT-Creation-Date: 2015-06-21 14:26+0000\n"
+"POT-Creation-Date: 2015-06-22 07:38+0000\n"
"PO-Revision-Date: 2013-01-16 14:00+0200\n"
"Last-Translator: Rafik E. Younan <address@hidden>\n"
"Language-Team: Arabic <>\n"
@@ -709,7 +709,7 @@
"Why is this perverse usage spreading? Some may feel that the term sounds "
"sophisticated; if that attracts you, rejecting it with cogent reasons can "
"appear even more sophisticated. Others may be acting from business "
-"interests (their own, or their employers’). Their use of the term in "
+"interests (their own, or their employers'). Their use of the term in "
"prestigious forums gives the impression that it's the “correct” "
"term."
msgstr ""
@@ -738,7 +738,7 @@
"The term “consumer,” when used to refer to the users of "
"computing, is loaded with assumptions we should reject. Some come from the "
"idea that using the program “consumes” the program (see <a href="
-"\"Consume\">the previous entry</a>), which leads people to impose on "
+"\"#Consume\">the previous entry</a>), which leads people to impose on "
"copiable digital works the economic conclusions that were drawn about "
"uncopiable material products."
msgstr ""
Index: words-to-avoid.de.po
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/po/words-to-avoid.de.po,v
retrieving revision 1.123
retrieving revision 1.124
diff -u -b -r1.123 -r1.124
--- words-to-avoid.de.po 21 Jun 2015 14:31:01 -0000 1.123
+++ words-to-avoid.de.po 22 Jun 2015 07:42:48 -0000 1.124
@@ -6,7 +6,7 @@
msgid ""
msgstr ""
"Project-Id-Version: words-to-avoid.html\n"
-"POT-Creation-Date: 2015-06-21 14:26+0000\n"
+"POT-Creation-Date: 2015-06-22 07:38+0000\n"
"PO-Revision-Date: 2015-04-04 22:00+0200\n"
"Last-Translator: Jоегg Kоhпе <joeko (AT) online [PUNKT] de>\n"
"Language-Team: German <address@hidden>\n"
@@ -766,7 +766,7 @@
"Why is this perverse usage spreading? Some may feel that the term sounds "
"sophisticated; if that attracts you, rejecting it with cogent reasons can "
"appear even more sophisticated. Others may be acting from business "
-"interests (their own, or their employers’). Their use of the term in "
+"interests (their own, or their employers'). Their use of the term in "
"prestigious forums gives the impression that it's the “correct” "
"term."
msgstr ""
@@ -796,7 +796,7 @@
"The term “consumer,” when used to refer to the users of "
"computing, is loaded with assumptions we should reject. Some come from the "
"idea that using the program “consumes” the program (see <a href="
-"\"Consume\">the previous entry</a>), which leads people to impose on "
+"\"#Consume\">the previous entry</a>), which leads people to impose on "
"copiable digital works the economic conclusions that were drawn about "
"uncopiable material products."
msgstr ""
Index: words-to-avoid.es.po
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/po/words-to-avoid.es.po,v
retrieving revision 1.195
retrieving revision 1.196
diff -u -b -r1.195 -r1.196
--- words-to-avoid.es.po 21 Jun 2015 14:31:01 -0000 1.195
+++ words-to-avoid.es.po 22 Jun 2015 07:42:48 -0000 1.196
@@ -15,7 +15,7 @@
msgstr ""
"Project-Id-Version: words-to-avoid.html\n"
"Report-Msgid-Bugs-To: \n"
-"POT-Creation-Date: 2015-06-21 14:26+0000\n"
+"POT-Creation-Date: 2015-06-22 07:38+0000\n"
"PO-Revision-Date: 2015-06-09 10:54+0100\n"
"Last-Translator: Javier Fdez. Retenaga <address@hidden>\n"
"Language-Team: Spanish <address@hidden>\n"
@@ -707,7 +707,7 @@
"Why is this perverse usage spreading? Some may feel that the term sounds "
"sophisticated; if that attracts you, rejecting it with cogent reasons can "
"appear even more sophisticated. Others may be acting from business "
-"interests (their own, or their employers’). Their use of the term in "
+"interests (their own, or their employers'). Their use of the term in "
"prestigious forums gives the impression that it's the “correct” "
"term."
msgstr ""
@@ -736,7 +736,7 @@
"The term “consumer,” when used to refer to the users of "
"computing, is loaded with assumptions we should reject. Some come from the "
"idea that using the program “consumes” the program (see <a href="
-"\"Consume\">the previous entry</a>), which leads people to impose on "
+"\"#Consume\">the previous entry</a>), which leads people to impose on "
"copiable digital works the economic conclusions that were drawn about "
"uncopiable material products."
msgstr ""
Index: words-to-avoid.fr.po
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/po/words-to-avoid.fr.po,v
retrieving revision 1.199
retrieving revision 1.200
diff -u -b -r1.199 -r1.200
--- words-to-avoid.fr.po 21 Jun 2015 14:31:02 -0000 1.199
+++ words-to-avoid.fr.po 22 Jun 2015 07:42:50 -0000 1.200
@@ -8,7 +8,7 @@
msgid ""
msgstr ""
"Project-Id-Version: words-to-avoid.html\n"
-"POT-Creation-Date: 2015-06-21 14:26+0000\n"
+"POT-Creation-Date: 2015-06-22 07:38+0000\n"
"PO-Revision-Date: 2015-06-06 17:59+0200\n"
"Last-Translator: Thérèse Godefroy <godef.th AT free.fr>\n"
"Language-Team: French <address@hidden>\n"
@@ -658,7 +658,7 @@
"Why is this perverse usage spreading? Some may feel that the term sounds "
"sophisticated; if that attracts you, rejecting it with cogent reasons can "
"appear even more sophisticated. Others may be acting from business "
-"interests (their own, or their employers’). Their use of the term in "
+"interests (their own, or their employers'). Their use of the term in "
"prestigious forums gives the impression that it's the “correct” "
"term."
msgstr ""
@@ -686,7 +686,7 @@
"The term “consumer,” when used to refer to the users of "
"computing, is loaded with assumptions we should reject. Some come from the "
"idea that using the program “consumes” the program (see <a href="
-"\"Consume\">the previous entry</a>), which leads people to impose on "
+"\"#Consume\">the previous entry</a>), which leads people to impose on "
"copiable digital works the economic conclusions that were drawn about "
"uncopiable material products."
msgstr ""
Index: words-to-avoid.it.po
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/po/words-to-avoid.it.po,v
retrieving revision 1.161
retrieving revision 1.162
diff -u -b -r1.161 -r1.162
--- words-to-avoid.it.po 21 Jun 2015 14:31:02 -0000 1.161
+++ words-to-avoid.it.po 22 Jun 2015 07:42:50 -0000 1.162
@@ -9,7 +9,7 @@
msgid ""
msgstr ""
"Project-Id-Version: words-to-avoid.html\n"
-"POT-Creation-Date: 2015-06-21 14:26+0000\n"
+"POT-Creation-Date: 2015-06-22 07:38+0000\n"
"PO-Revision-Date: \n"
"Last-Translator: Andrea Pescetti <address@hidden>\n"
"Language-Team: \n"
@@ -646,7 +646,7 @@
"Why is this perverse usage spreading? Some may feel that the term sounds "
"sophisticated; if that attracts you, rejecting it with cogent reasons can "
"appear even more sophisticated. Others may be acting from business "
-"interests (their own, or their employers’). Their use of the term in "
+"interests (their own, or their employers'). Their use of the term in "
"prestigious forums gives the impression that it's the “correct” "
"term."
msgstr ""
@@ -674,7 +674,7 @@
"The term “consumer,” when used to refer to the users of "
"computing, is loaded with assumptions we should reject. Some come from the "
"idea that using the program “consumes” the program (see <a href="
-"\"Consume\">the previous entry</a>), which leads people to impose on "
+"\"#Consume\">the previous entry</a>), which leads people to impose on "
"copiable digital works the economic conclusions that were drawn about "
"uncopiable material products."
msgstr ""
Index: words-to-avoid.ja.po
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/po/words-to-avoid.ja.po,v
retrieving revision 1.100
retrieving revision 1.101
diff -u -b -r1.100 -r1.101
--- words-to-avoid.ja.po 21 Jun 2015 14:31:02 -0000 1.100
+++ words-to-avoid.ja.po 22 Jun 2015 07:42:51 -0000 1.101
@@ -8,7 +8,7 @@
msgid ""
msgstr ""
"Project-Id-Version: words-to-avoid.html\n"
-"POT-Creation-Date: 2015-06-21 14:26+0000\n"
+"POT-Creation-Date: 2015-06-22 07:38+0000\n"
"PO-Revision-Date: 2015-06-01 15:19+0900\n"
"Last-Translator: NIIBE Yutaka <address@hidden>\n"
"Language-Team: Japanese <address@hidden>\n"
@@ -604,7 +604,7 @@
"Why is this perverse usage spreading? Some may feel that the term sounds "
"sophisticated; if that attracts you, rejecting it with cogent reasons can "
"appear even more sophisticated. Others may be acting from business "
-"interests (their own, or their employers’). Their use of the term in "
+"interests (their own, or their employers'). Their use of the term in "
"prestigious forums gives the impression that it's the “correct” "
"term."
msgstr ""
@@ -632,7 +632,7 @@
"The term “consumer,” when used to refer to the users of "
"computing, is loaded with assumptions we should reject. Some come from the "
"idea that using the program “consumes” the program (see <a href="
-"\"Consume\">the previous entry</a>), which leads people to impose on "
+"\"#Consume\">the previous entry</a>), which leads people to impose on "
"copiable digital works the economic conclusions that were drawn about "
"uncopiable material products."
msgstr ""
Index: words-to-avoid.pot
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/po/words-to-avoid.pot,v
retrieving revision 1.96
retrieving revision 1.97
diff -u -b -r1.96 -r1.97
--- words-to-avoid.pot 21 Jun 2015 14:31:03 -0000 1.96
+++ words-to-avoid.pot 22 Jun 2015 07:42:52 -0000 1.97
@@ -7,7 +7,7 @@
msgid ""
msgstr ""
"Project-Id-Version: words-to-avoid.html\n"
-"POT-Creation-Date: 2015-06-21 14:26+0000\n"
+"POT-Creation-Date: 2015-06-22 07:38+0000\n"
"PO-Revision-Date: YEAR-MO-DA HO:MI+ZONE\n"
"Last-Translator: FULL NAME <address@hidden>\n"
"Language-Team: LANGUAGE <address@hidden>\n"
@@ -491,7 +491,7 @@
"Why is this perverse usage spreading? Some may feel that the term sounds "
"sophisticated; if that attracts you, rejecting it with cogent reasons can "
"appear even more sophisticated. Others may be acting from business "
-"interests (their own, or their employers’). Their use of the term in "
+"interests (their own, or their employers'). Their use of the term in "
"prestigious forums gives the impression that it's the “correct” "
"term."
msgstr ""
@@ -519,7 +519,7 @@
"The term “consumer,” when used to refer to the users of "
"computing, is loaded with assumptions we should reject. Some come from the "
"idea that using the program “consumes” the program (see <a "
-"href=\"Consume\">the previous entry</a>), which leads people to impose on "
+"href=\"#Consume\">the previous entry</a>), which leads people to impose on "
"copiable digital works the economic conclusions that were drawn about "
"uncopiable material products."
msgstr ""
Index: words-to-avoid.ru.po
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/po/words-to-avoid.ru.po,v
retrieving revision 1.125
retrieving revision 1.126
diff -u -b -r1.125 -r1.126
--- words-to-avoid.ru.po 21 Jun 2015 14:31:03 -0000 1.125
+++ words-to-avoid.ru.po 22 Jun 2015 07:42:52 -0000 1.126
@@ -7,7 +7,7 @@
msgid ""
msgstr ""
"Project-Id-Version: words-to-avoid.html\n"
-"POT-Creation-Date: 2015-06-21 14:26+0000\n"
+"POT-Creation-Date: 2015-06-22 07:38+0000\n"
"PO-Revision-Date: 2015-06-06 17:34+0000\n"
"Last-Translator: Ineiev <address@hidden>\n"
"Language-Team: Russian <address@hidden>\n"
@@ -730,7 +730,7 @@
"Why is this perverse usage spreading? Some may feel that the term sounds "
"sophisticated; if that attracts you, rejecting it with cogent reasons can "
"appear even more sophisticated. Others may be acting from business "
-"interests (their own, or their employers’). Their use of the term in "
+"interests (their own, or their employers'). Their use of the term in "
"prestigious forums gives the impression that it's the “correct” "
"term."
msgstr ""
@@ -759,7 +759,7 @@
"The term “consumer,” when used to refer to the users of "
"computing, is loaded with assumptions we should reject. Some come from the "
"idea that using the program “consumes” the program (see <a href="
-"\"Consume\">the previous entry</a>), which leads people to impose on "
+"\"#Consume\">the previous entry</a>), which leads people to impose on "
"copiable digital works the economic conclusions that were drawn about "
"uncopiable material products."
msgstr ""
Index: words-to-avoid.sq.po
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/po/words-to-avoid.sq.po,v
retrieving revision 1.50
retrieving revision 1.51
diff -u -b -r1.50 -r1.51
--- words-to-avoid.sq.po 21 Jun 2015 14:31:03 -0000 1.50
+++ words-to-avoid.sq.po 22 Jun 2015 07:42:53 -0000 1.51
@@ -6,7 +6,7 @@
msgid ""
msgstr ""
"Project-Id-Version: words-to-avoid.html\n"
-"POT-Creation-Date: 2015-06-21 14:26+0000\n"
+"POT-Creation-Date: 2015-06-22 07:38+0000\n"
"PO-Revision-Date: 2013-01-05 20:03+0200\n"
"Last-Translator: Besnik Bleta <address@hidden>\n"
"Language-Team: LANGUAGE <address@hidden>\n"
@@ -497,7 +497,7 @@
"Why is this perverse usage spreading? Some may feel that the term sounds "
"sophisticated; if that attracts you, rejecting it with cogent reasons can "
"appear even more sophisticated. Others may be acting from business "
-"interests (their own, or their employers’). Their use of the term in "
+"interests (their own, or their employers'). Their use of the term in "
"prestigious forums gives the impression that it's the “correct” "
"term."
msgstr ""
@@ -525,7 +525,7 @@
"The term “consumer,” when used to refer to the users of "
"computing, is loaded with assumptions we should reject. Some come from the "
"idea that using the program “consumes” the program (see <a href="
-"\"Consume\">the previous entry</a>), which leads people to impose on "
+"\"#Consume\">the previous entry</a>), which leads people to impose on "
"copiable digital works the economic conclusions that were drawn about "
"uncopiable material products."
msgstr ""
Index: words-to-avoid.sr.po
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/po/words-to-avoid.sr.po,v
retrieving revision 1.104
retrieving revision 1.105
diff -u -b -r1.104 -r1.105
--- words-to-avoid.sr.po 21 Jun 2015 14:31:03 -0000 1.104
+++ words-to-avoid.sr.po 22 Jun 2015 07:42:53 -0000 1.105
@@ -8,7 +8,7 @@
msgid ""
msgstr ""
"Project-Id-Version: words-to-avoid.html\n"
-"POT-Creation-Date: 2015-06-21 14:26+0000\n"
+"POT-Creation-Date: 2015-06-22 07:38+0000\n"
"PO-Revision-Date: 2009-10-18 17:51+0200\n"
"Last-Translator: Strahinya Radich <address@hidden>\n"
"Language-Team: Serbian <address@hidden>\n"
@@ -674,7 +674,7 @@
"Why is this perverse usage spreading? Some may feel that the term sounds "
"sophisticated; if that attracts you, rejecting it with cogent reasons can "
"appear even more sophisticated. Others may be acting from business "
-"interests (their own, or their employers’). Their use of the term in "
+"interests (their own, or their employers'). Their use of the term in "
"prestigious forums gives the impression that it's the “correct” "
"term."
msgstr ""
@@ -703,7 +703,7 @@
"The term “consumer,” when used to refer to the users of "
"computing, is loaded with assumptions we should reject. Some come from the "
"idea that using the program “consumes” the program (see <a href="
-"\"Consume\">the previous entry</a>), which leads people to impose on "
+"\"#Consume\">the previous entry</a>), which leads people to impose on "
"copiable digital works the economic conclusions that were drawn about "
"uncopiable material products."
msgstr ""
Index: words-to-avoid.tr.po
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/po/words-to-avoid.tr.po,v
retrieving revision 1.77
retrieving revision 1.78
diff -u -b -r1.77 -r1.78
--- words-to-avoid.tr.po 21 Jun 2015 14:31:04 -0000 1.77
+++ words-to-avoid.tr.po 22 Jun 2015 07:42:53 -0000 1.78
@@ -12,7 +12,7 @@
msgid ""
msgstr ""
"Project-Id-Version: words-to-avoid.html\n"
-"POT-Creation-Date: 2015-06-21 14:26+0000\n"
+"POT-Creation-Date: 2015-06-22 07:38+0000\n"
"PO-Revision-Date: 2010-01-25 16:11+0100\n"
"Last-Translator: Tahir Emre Kalaycı <address@hidden>\n"
"Language-Team: Turkish <address@hidden>\n"
@@ -677,7 +677,7 @@
"Why is this perverse usage spreading? Some may feel that the term sounds "
"sophisticated; if that attracts you, rejecting it with cogent reasons can "
"appear even more sophisticated. Others may be acting from business "
-"interests (their own, or their employers’). Their use of the term in "
+"interests (their own, or their employers'). Their use of the term in "
"prestigious forums gives the impression that it's the “correct” "
"term."
msgstr ""
@@ -706,7 +706,7 @@
"The term “consumer,” when used to refer to the users of "
"computing, is loaded with assumptions we should reject. Some come from the "
"idea that using the program “consumes” the program (see <a href="
-"\"Consume\">the previous entry</a>), which leads people to impose on "
+"\"#Consume\">the previous entry</a>), which leads people to impose on "
"copiable digital works the economic conclusions that were drawn about "
"uncopiable material products."
msgstr ""
| [Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread] |
- www/philosophy/po words-to-avoid.ar-diff.html w...,
GNUN <=