www/licenses license-list.html

[Joshua Gay]

CVSROOT:        /web/www
Module name:    www
Changes by:     Joshua Gay <josh>       15/01/30 16:52:54

Modified files:
        licenses       : license-list.html 

Log message:
        Summary: moving ecfonts into font section

CVSWeb URLs:
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/licenses/license-list.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.423&r2=1.424

Patches:
Index: license-list.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/licenses/license-list.html,v
retrieving revision 1.423
retrieving revision 1.424
diff -u -b -r1.423 -r1.424
--- license-list.html   28 Jan 2015 22:55:13 -0000      1.423
+++ license-list.html   30 Jan 2015 16:52:53 -0000      1.424
@@ -464,26 +464,6 @@
 compatible with the GNU GPL.  It is very similar to the X11 license.</p></dd>
 
 
-<dt><a id="ecfonts"
-       href="http://directory.fsf.org/wiki/License:LaTeX_ecfonts";>License
-       of the ec fonts for LaTeX</a>
-    <span class="anchor-reference-id">(<a 
href="#ecfonts">#ecfonts</a>)</span></dt>
-<dd>
-<p>This license covers the European Computer Modern Fonts and Text
-Companion Fonts, commonly used with LaTeX.  Depending on how it is
-used, it may be free or not.  If the package says that some fonts in
-the package may not be modified, then the package is nonfree.
-Otherwise the package is free.  The original fonts have no
-restrictions on modification, so they are free.</p>
-
-<p>Much like <a href="#LPPL-1.2">the LaTeX Project Public
-License 1.2</a>, this license requires modified versions of the work
-to use a name that's different from the name of any prior version.
-This is acceptable for work meant to be used with LaTeX, since TeX
-allows you to create filename mappings for your programs, but it's
-very annoying and could be overly burdensome in other contexts.</p>
-</dd>
-
 
 <dt><a id="eCos20"></a>  <!-- without decimal, leave for compatibility -->
     <a id="eCos2.0" href="http://directory.fsf.org/wiki/License:ECos2.0";>
@@ -2415,6 +2395,27 @@
 GPL. Its normal use is for fonts, and in that use, the
 incompatibility does not cause a problem.</p></dd>
 
+<dt><a id="ecfonts"
+       href="http://directory.fsf.org/wiki/License:LaTeX_ecfonts";>License
+       of the ec fonts for LaTeX</a>
+    <span class="anchor-reference-id">(<a 
href="#ecfonts">#ecfonts</a>)</span></dt>
+<dd>
+<p>This license covers the European Computer Modern Fonts and Text
+Companion Fonts, commonly used with LaTeX.  Depending on how it is
+used, it may be free or not.  If the package says that some fonts in
+the package may not be modified, then the package is nonfree.
+Otherwise the package is free.  The original fonts have no
+restrictions on modification, so they are free.</p>
+
+<p>Much like <a href="#LPPL-1.2">the LaTeX Project Public
+License 1.2</a>, this license requires modified versions of the work
+to use a name that's different from the name of any prior version.
+This is acceptable for work meant to be used with LaTeX, since TeX
+allows you to create filename mappings for your programs, but it's
+very annoying and could be overly burdensome in other contexts.</p>
+</dd>
+
+
 <dt><a id="IPAFONT"
     href="http://directory.fsf.org/wiki/License:IPA_Font_License";> IPA
     Font License</a>
@@ -2554,7 +2555,7 @@
 
 <p class="unprintable">Updated:
 <!-- timestamp start -->
-$Date: 2015/01/28 22:55:13 $
+$Date: 2015/01/30 16:52:53 $
 <!-- timestamp end -->
 </p>
 </div>