www/philosophy words-to-avoid.it.html po/words-...

[GNUN]

CVSROOT:        /web/www
Module name:    www
Changes by:     GNUN <gnun>     14/11/14 22:27:45

Modified files:
        philosophy     : words-to-avoid.it.html 
        philosophy/po  : words-to-avoid.it-en.html words-to-avoid.it.po 

Log message:
        Automatic update by GNUnited Nations.

CVSWeb URLs:
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/words-to-avoid.it.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.66&r2=1.67
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/po/words-to-avoid.it-en.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.60&r2=1.61
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/po/words-to-avoid.it.po?cvsroot=www&r1=1.131&r2=1.132

Patches:
Index: words-to-avoid.it.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/words-to-avoid.it.html,v
retrieving revision 1.66
retrieving revision 1.67
diff -u -b -r1.66 -r1.67
--- words-to-avoid.it.html      6 Aug 2014 11:14:39 -0000       1.66
+++ words-to-avoid.it.html      14 Nov 2014 22:27:44 -0000      1.67
@@ -253,12 +253,14 @@
 autore. Tale uso rivela un  atteggiamento specifico nei confronti di tali
 opere: le considera  come beni di consumo intercambiabili il cui scopo è
 quello di  riempire una scatola e far soldi. In realtà ciò significa
-considerare in maniera irrispettosa le opere stesse.</p>
+considerare in maniera irrispettosa le opere stesse. Chi vuole evitare
+questo errore può parlare di "opere" o di "pubblicazioni".
+</p>
 <p>
-Coloro che usano questo termine sono spesso editori tesi ad  ottenere un
-maggior potere nel copyright a nome degli autori (o  "creatori", come vanno
-definendoli) delle opere. Il termine  "contenuto" ne rivela i sentimenti
-concreti. Vedere la <a
+Coloro che usano il termine "contenuto" sono spesso editori tesi ad
+ottenere un maggior potere nel copyright a nome degli autori (o  "creatori",
+come vanno definendoli) delle opere. Il termine  "contenuto" ne rivela i
+sentimenti concreti. Vedere la <a
 href="http://archive.salon.com/tech/feature/2000/06/14/love/print.html";>lettera
 aperta di Courtney Love a Steve Case</a>, cercando le parole &ldquo;content
 provider&rdquo; nella pagina; purtroppo, la signora Love non sa che anche il
@@ -911,7 +913,7 @@
 <p class="unprintable"><!-- timestamp start -->
 Ultimo aggiornamento:
 
-$Date: 2014/08/06 11:14:39 $
+$Date: 2014/11/14 22:27:44 $
 
 <!-- timestamp end -->
 </p>

Index: po/words-to-avoid.it-en.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/po/words-to-avoid.it-en.html,v
retrieving revision 1.60
retrieving revision 1.61
diff -u -b -r1.60 -r1.61
--- po/words-to-avoid.it-en.html        6 Aug 2014 11:14:47 -0000       1.60
+++ po/words-to-avoid.it-en.html        14 Nov 2014 22:27:45 -0000      1.61
@@ -331,17 +331,20 @@
 noun to describe written and other works of authorship adopts an
 attitude you might rather avoid.  It regards these works as a
 commodity whose purpose is to fill a box and make money.  In effect,
-it disparages the works themselves.</p>
+it disparages the works themselves.  If you don't agree with that
+attitude, you can call them &ldquo;works&rdquo; or &ldquo;publications.&rdquo;
+</p>
 <p>
-Those who use this term are often the publishers that push for
-increased copyright power in the name of the authors
+Those who use the term &ldquo;content&rdquo; are often the publishers
+that push for increased copyright power in the name of the authors
 (&ldquo;creators,&rdquo; as they say) of the works.  The term
-&ldquo;content&rdquo; reveals their real attitude towards these works and 
their authors.
+&ldquo;content&rdquo; reveals their real attitude towards these works
+and their authors.
 (See <a 
href="http://archive.salon.com/tech/feature/2000/06/14/love/print.html";>Courtney
 Love's open letter to Steve Case</a> and search for &ldquo;content
 provider&rdquo; in that page.  Alas, Ms. Love is unaware that the term
-&ldquo;intellectual property&rdquo; is also <a href="#IntellectualProperty">
-biased and confusing</a>.)</p>
+&ldquo;intellectual property&rdquo; is
+also <a href="#IntellectualProperty"> biased and confusing</a>.)</p>
 <p>
 However, as long as other people use the term &ldquo;content
 provider,&rdquo; political dissidents can well call themselves
@@ -976,7 +979,7 @@
 
 <p class="unprintable">Updated:
 <!-- timestamp start -->
-$Date: 2014/08/06 11:14:47 $
+$Date: 2014/11/14 22:27:45 $
 <!-- timestamp end -->
 </p>
 </div>

Index: po/words-to-avoid.it.po
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/po/words-to-avoid.it.po,v
retrieving revision 1.131
retrieving revision 1.132
diff -u -b -r1.131 -r1.132
--- po/words-to-avoid.it.po     14 Nov 2014 22:09:02 -0000      1.131
+++ po/words-to-avoid.it.po     14 Nov 2014 22:27:45 -0000      1.132
@@ -16,7 +16,6 @@
 "MIME-Version: 1.0\n"
 "Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8\n"
 "Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit\n"
-"X-Outdated-Since: 2014-11-14 00:28+0000\n"
 "X-Generator: Poedit 1.5.4\n"
 
 #. type: Content of: <title>
@@ -213,8 +212,8 @@
 #. type: Content of: <p>
 msgid "&ldquo;<a href=\"#SharingEconomy\">Sharing economy</a>&rdquo; |"
 msgstr ""
-"&ldquo;<a href=\"#SharingEconomy\">Economia di condivisione (Sharing "
-"economy)</a>&rdquo; |"
+"&ldquo;<a href=\"#SharingEconomy\">Economia di condivisione (Sharing economy)"
+"</a>&rdquo; |"
 
 #. type: Content of: <p>
 msgid "&ldquo;<a href=\"#SoftwareIndustry\">Software Industry</a>&rdquo; |"
@@ -673,21 +672,7 @@
 msgid "&ldquo;Content&rdquo;"
 msgstr "&ldquo;Contenuto&rdquo;"
 
-# | If you want to describe a feeling of comfort and satisfaction, by all
-# | means say you are &ldquo;content,&rdquo; but using the word as a noun to
-# | describe written and other works of authorship adopts an attitude you
-# | might rather avoid.  It regards these works as a commodity whose purpose
-# | is to fill a box and make money.  In effect, it disparages the works
-# | themselves.  {+If you don't agree with that attitude, you can call them
-# | &ldquo;works&rdquo; or &ldquo;publications.&rdquo;+}
-#. type: Content of: <p>
-#| msgid ""
-#| "If you want to describe a feeling of comfort and satisfaction, by all "
-#| "means say you are &ldquo;content,&rdquo; but using the word as a noun to "
-#| "describe written and other works of authorship adopts an attitude you "
-#| "might rather avoid.  It regards these works as a commodity whose purpose "
-#| "is to fill a box and make money.  In effect, it disparages the works "
-#| "themselves."
+#. type: Content of: <p>
 msgid ""
 "If you want to describe a feeling of comfort and satisfaction, by all means "
 "say you are &ldquo;content,&rdquo; but using the word as a noun to describe "
@@ -706,27 +691,7 @@
 "considerare in maniera irrispettosa le opere stesse. Chi vuole evitare "
 "questo errore può parlare di \"opere\" o di \"pubblicazioni\"."
 
-# | Those who use [-this-] {+the+} term {+&ldquo;content&rdquo;+} are often
-# | the publishers that push for increased copyright power in the name of the
-# | authors (&ldquo;creators,&rdquo; as they say) of the works.  The term
-# | &ldquo;content&rdquo; reveals their real attitude towards these works and
-# | their authors.  (See <a
-# | 
href=\"http://archive.salon.com/tech/feature/2000/06/14/love/print.html\";>Courtney
-# | Love's open letter to Steve Case</a> and search for &ldquo;content
-# | provider&rdquo; in that page.  Alas, Ms. Love is unaware that the term
-# | &ldquo;intellectual property&rdquo; is also <a
-# | href=\"#IntellectualProperty\"> biased and confusing</a>.)
-#. type: Content of: <p>
-#| msgid ""
-#| "Those who use this term are often the publishers that push for increased "
-#| "copyright power in the name of the authors (&ldquo;creators,&rdquo; as "
-#| "they say) of the works.  The term &ldquo;content&rdquo; reveals their "
-#| "real attitude towards these works and their authors.  (See <a href="
-#| "\"http://archive.salon.com/tech/feature/2000/06/14/love/print.html";
-#| "\">Courtney Love's open letter to Steve Case</a> and search for &ldquo;"
-#| "content provider&rdquo; in that page.  Alas, Ms. Love is unaware that the "
-#| "term &ldquo;intellectual property&rdquo; is also <a href="
-#| "\"#IntellectualProperty\"> biased and confusing</a>.)"
+#. type: Content of: <p>
 msgid ""
 "Those who use the term &ldquo;content&rdquo; are often the publishers that "
 "push for increased copyright power in the name of the authors (&ldquo;"