www/licenses license-recommendations.html

[Dora Scilipoti]

CVSROOT:        /web/www
Module name:    www
Changes by:     Dora Scilipoti <dora>   14/09/29 14:23:29

Modified files:
        licenses       : license-recommendations.html 

Log message:
        Validation fix.

CVSWeb URLs:
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/licenses/license-recommendations.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.28&r2=1.29

Patches:
Index: license-recommendations.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/licenses/license-recommendations.html,v
retrieving revision 1.28
retrieving revision 1.29
diff -u -b -r1.28 -r1.29
--- license-recommendations.html        29 Sep 2014 11:29:43 -0000      1.28
+++ license-recommendations.html        29 Sep 2014 14:23:29 -0000      1.29
@@ -103,7 +103,7 @@
 are going to use a lax pushover license, whatever the reason,
 we recommend using that one.</p>
 
-<h4 id="libraries">Libraries</h3>
+<h3 id="libraries">Libraries</h3>
 
 <p>For libraries, we distinguish three kind of cases.</p>
 
@@ -139,9 +139,9 @@
 face entrenched noncopylefted or nonfree competition, we recommend
 using the plain GNU GPL.  For the reasons why,
 read <a href="/licenses/why-not-lgpl.html">&ldquo;Why you shouldn't
-use the Lesser GPL for your next library&rdquo;</a>.
+use the Lesser GPL for your next library&rdquo;</a>.</p>
 
-<h4 id="server">Server Software</h3>
+<h3 id="server">Server Software</h3>
 
 <p>If it is likely that others will make improved versions of your
 program to run on servers and not distribute their versions to anyone
@@ -276,7 +276,7 @@
 
 <p class="unprintable">Updated:
 <!-- timestamp start -->
-$Date: 2014/09/29 11:29:43 $
+$Date: 2014/09/29 14:23:29 $
 <!-- timestamp end -->
 </p>
 </div>