www/philosophy words-to-avoid.it.html po/words-...

[GNUN]

CVSROOT:        /web/www
Module name:    www
Changes by:     GNUN <gnun>     14/06/17 07:47:59

Modified files:
        philosophy     : words-to-avoid.it.html 
        philosophy/po  : words-to-avoid.it-en.html words-to-avoid.it.po 

Log message:
        Automatic update by GNUnited Nations.

CVSWeb URLs:
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/words-to-avoid.it.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.61&r2=1.62
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/po/words-to-avoid.it-en.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.55&r2=1.56
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/po/words-to-avoid.it.po?cvsroot=www&r1=1.116&r2=1.117

Patches:
Index: words-to-avoid.it.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/words-to-avoid.it.html,v
retrieving revision 1.61
retrieving revision 1.62
diff -u -b -r1.61 -r1.62
--- words-to-avoid.it.html      23 May 2014 21:29:04 -0000      1.61
+++ words-to-avoid.it.html      17 Jun 2014 07:47:35 -0000      1.62
@@ -372,8 +372,9 @@
 
 <h4 id="FLOSS">&ldquo;FLOSS&rdquo;</h4>
 <p>
-Il termine &ldquo;FLOSS&rdquo; è stato creato come opzione per essere <a
-href="/philosophy/floss-and-foss.html"> neutrali tra software libero e open
+Il termine &ldquo;FLOSS&rdquo;, che sta per &ldquo;Free/Libre and Open
+Source Software&rdquo;, è stato creato come opzione per essere <a
+href="/philosophy/floss-and-foss.html">neutrali tra software libero e open
 source</a>.  Per chi desidera essere neutrale, &ldquo;FLOSS&rdquo; è la
 scelta migliore; ma chi vuole difendere la libertà non dovrebbe usare
 termini neutrali.</p>
@@ -397,7 +398,8 @@
 
 <h4 id="FOSS">&ldquo;FOSS&rdquo;</h4>
 <p>
-Il termine &ldquo;FOSS&rdquo; è stato creato come opzione per essere <a
+Il termine &ldquo;FOSS&rdquo;, che sta per &ldquo;Free and Open Source
+Software&rdquo;, è stato creato come opzione per essere <a
 href="/philosophy/floss-and-foss.html"> neutrali tra software libero e open
 source</a>, ma non rispetta appieno il suo scopo. Per chi desidera essere
 neutrale, è meglio usare &ldquo;FLOSS&rdquo;; ma chi vuole difendere la
@@ -889,7 +891,7 @@
 <p class="unprintable"><!-- timestamp start -->
 Ultimo aggiornamento:
 
-$Date: 2014/05/23 21:29:04 $
+$Date: 2014/06/17 07:47:35 $
 
 <!-- timestamp end -->
 </p>

Index: po/words-to-avoid.it-en.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/po/words-to-avoid.it-en.html,v
retrieving revision 1.55
retrieving revision 1.56
diff -u -b -r1.55 -r1.56
--- po/words-to-avoid.it-en.html        23 May 2014 21:29:04 -0000      1.55
+++ po/words-to-avoid.it-en.html        17 Jun 2014 07:47:39 -0000      1.56
@@ -446,8 +446,9 @@
 
 <h4 id="FLOSS">&ldquo;FLOSS&rdquo;</h4>
 <p>
-The term &ldquo;FLOSS&rdquo; was coined as a way
-to <a href="/philosophy/floss-and-foss.html"> be neutral between free
+The term &ldquo;FLOSS,&rdquo; meaning &ldquo;Free/Libre and Open
+Source Software,&rdquo; was coined as a way
+to <a href="/philosophy/floss-and-foss.html">be neutral between free
 software and open source</a>.  If neutrality is your goal,
 &ldquo;FLOSS&rdquo; is the best way to be neutral.  But if you want to
 show you stand for freedom, don't use a neutral term.</p>
@@ -470,8 +471,9 @@
 
 <h4 id="FOSS">&ldquo;FOSS&rdquo;</h4>
 <p>
-The term &ldquo;FOSS&rdquo; was coined as a way
-to <a href="/philosophy/floss-and-foss.html"> be neutral between free
+The term &ldquo;FOSS,&rdquo; meaning &ldquo;Free and Open Source
+Software,&rdquo; was coined as a way
+to <a href="/philosophy/floss-and-foss.html">be neutral between free
 software and open source</a>, but it doesn't really do that.  If
 neutrality is your goal, &ldquo;FLOSS&rdquo; is better.  But if you
 want to show you stand for freedom, don't use a neutral term.</p>
@@ -823,11 +825,11 @@
 distributed, but the text confuses this with the development
 methodology.  It distinguishes &ldquo;open source&rdquo; and
 &rdquo;shared source&rdquo; as answers, but they overlap &mdash;
-Microsoft uses that marketing term to cover a range of practices, some
-of which are &ldquo;open source&rdquo;.  Thus, this term seems to
-convey no coherent information, but it provides an opportunity to say
-&ldquo;open source&rdquo; in pages describing free software
-programs.</p>
+Microsoft uses the latter as a marketing term to cover a range of
+practices, some of which are &ldquo;open source&rdquo;.  Thus, this
+term really conveys no coherent information, but it provides an
+opportunity to say &ldquo;open source&rdquo; in pages describing free
+software programs.</p>
 
 <h4 id="Theft">&ldquo;Theft&rdquo;</h4>
 <p>
@@ -952,7 +954,7 @@
 
 <p class="unprintable">Updated:
 <!-- timestamp start -->
-$Date: 2014/05/23 21:29:04 $
+$Date: 2014/06/17 07:47:39 $
 <!-- timestamp end -->
 </p>
 </div>

Index: po/words-to-avoid.it.po
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/po/words-to-avoid.it.po,v
retrieving revision 1.116
retrieving revision 1.117
diff -u -b -r1.116 -r1.117
--- po/words-to-avoid.it.po     17 Jun 2014 06:59:49 -0000      1.116
+++ po/words-to-avoid.it.po     17 Jun 2014 07:47:40 -0000      1.117
@@ -16,7 +16,6 @@
 "MIME-Version: 1.0\n"
 "Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8\n"
 "Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit\n"
-"X-Outdated-Since: 2014-06-16 12:27+0000\n"
 "X-Generator: Poedit 1.5.4\n"
 
 #. type: Content of: <title>
@@ -928,19 +927,7 @@
 msgid "&ldquo;FLOSS&rdquo;"
 msgstr "&ldquo;FLOSS&rdquo;"
 
-# | The term [-&ldquo;FLOSS&rdquo;-] {+&ldquo;FLOSS,&rdquo; meaning
-# | &ldquo;Free/Libre and Open Source Software,&rdquo;+} was coined as a way
-# | to <a href=\"/philosophy/floss-and-foss.html\">[- -]be neutral between
-# | free software and open source</a>.  If neutrality is your goal,
-# | &ldquo;FLOSS&rdquo; is the best way to be neutral.  But if you want to
-# | show you stand for freedom, don't use a neutral term.
-#. type: Content of: <p>
-#| msgid ""
-#| "The term &ldquo;FLOSS&rdquo; was coined as a way to <a href=\"/philosophy/"
-#| "floss-and-foss.html\"> be neutral between free software and open source</"
-#| "a>.  If neutrality is your goal, &ldquo;FLOSS&rdquo; is the best way to "
-#| "be neutral.  But if you want to show you stand for freedom, don't use a "
-#| "neutral term."
+#. type: Content of: <p>
 msgid ""
 "The term &ldquo;FLOSS,&rdquo; meaning &ldquo;Free/Libre and Open Source "
 "Software,&rdquo; was coined as a way to <a href=\"/philosophy/floss-and-foss."
@@ -997,19 +984,7 @@
 msgid "&ldquo;FOSS&rdquo;"
 msgstr "&ldquo;FOSS&rdquo;"
 
-# | The term [-&ldquo;FOSS&rdquo;-] {+&ldquo;FOSS,&rdquo; meaning &ldquo;Free
-# | and Open Source Software,&rdquo;+} was coined as a way to <a
-# | href=\"/philosophy/floss-and-foss.html\">[- -]be neutral between free
-# | software and open source</a>, but it doesn't really do that.  If
-# | neutrality is your goal, &ldquo;FLOSS&rdquo; is better.  But if you want
-# | to show you stand for freedom, don't use a neutral term.
-#. type: Content of: <p>
-#| msgid ""
-#| "The term &ldquo;FOSS&rdquo; was coined as a way to <a href=\"/philosophy/"
-#| "floss-and-foss.html\"> be neutral between free software and open source</"
-#| "a>, but it doesn't really do that.  If neutrality is your goal, &ldquo;"
-#| "FLOSS&rdquo; is better.  But if you want to show you stand for freedom, "
-#| "don't use a neutral term."
+#. type: Content of: <p>
 msgid ""
 "The term &ldquo;FOSS,&rdquo; meaning &ldquo;Free and Open Source Software,"
 "&rdquo; was coined as a way to <a href=\"/philosophy/floss-and-foss.html"
@@ -1716,26 +1691,7 @@
 msgid "&ldquo;Source model&rdquo;"
 msgstr "&ldquo;Modello di sorgente (Source model)&rdquo;"
 
-# | Wikipedia uses the term &ldquo;source model&rdquo; in a confused and
-# | ambiguous way.  Ostensibly it refers to how a program's source is
-# | distributed, but the text confuses this with the development methodology.
-# | It distinguishes &ldquo;open source&rdquo; and &rdquo;shared source&rdquo;
-# | as answers, but they overlap &mdash; Microsoft uses [-that-] {+the latter
-# | as a+} marketing term to cover a range of practices, some of which are
-# | &ldquo;open source&rdquo;.  Thus, this term [-seems to convey-] {+really
-# | conveys+} no coherent information, but it provides an opportunity to say
-# | &ldquo;open source&rdquo; in pages describing free software programs.
-#. type: Content of: <p>
-#| msgid ""
-#| "Wikipedia uses the term &ldquo;source model&rdquo; in a confused and "
-#| "ambiguous way.  Ostensibly it refers to how a program's source is "
-#| "distributed, but the text confuses this with the development "
-#| "methodology.  It distinguishes &ldquo;open source&rdquo; and &rdquo;"
-#| "shared source&rdquo; as answers, but they overlap &mdash; Microsoft uses "
-#| "that marketing term to cover a range of practices, some of which are "
-#| "&ldquo;open source&rdquo;.  Thus, this term seems to convey no coherent "
-#| "information, but it provides an opportunity to say &ldquo;open "
-#| "source&rdquo; in pages describing free software programs."
+#. type: Content of: <p>
 msgid ""
 "Wikipedia uses the term &ldquo;source model&rdquo; in a confused and "
 "ambiguous way.  Ostensibly it refers to how a program's source is "