www-commits
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

www/philosophy imperfection-isnt-oppression.html


From: Richard M. Stallman
Subject: www/philosophy imperfection-isnt-oppression.html
Date: Thu, 29 May 2014 10:44:35 +0000

CVSROOT:        /web/www
Module name:    www
Changes by:     Richard M. Stallman <rms>       14/05/29 10:44:35

Modified files:
        philosophy     : imperfection-isnt-oppression.html 

Log message:
        It's only a free program that isn't doing wrong.

CVSWeb URLs:
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/imperfection-isnt-oppression.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.3&r2=1.4

Patches:
Index: imperfection-isnt-oppression.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/imperfection-isnt-oppression.html,v
retrieving revision 1.3
retrieving revision 1.4
diff -u -b -r1.3 -r1.4
--- imperfection-isnt-oppression.html   27 May 2014 23:22:52 -0000      1.3
+++ imperfection-isnt-oppression.html   29 May 2014 10:44:34 -0000      1.4
@@ -44,13 +44,13 @@
   developing a free replacement, but we can't make the nonfree program
   free.</p>
 
-<p>Developing a program without adding a certain important feature is not
-  doing wrong to anyone. Rather, it's doing some good but not all the
-  good that people need. Nobody in particular deserves condemnation for
-  not developing the missing feature, since any capable person could do
-  it. It would be ungrateful, as well as self-defeating, to single out
-  the free program's authors for blame for not having done some
-  additional work.</p>
+<p>Developing a free program without adding a certain important
+  feature is not doing wrong to anyone. Rather, it's doing some good
+  but not all the good that people need. Nobody in particular deserves
+  condemnation for not developing the missing feature, since any
+  capable person could do it. It would be ungrateful, as well as
+  self-defeating, to single out the free program's authors for blame
+  for not having done some additional work.</p>
 
 <p>What we can do is state that completing the job calls for doing
   some additional work. That is constructive because it helps us
@@ -104,7 +104,7 @@
 
 <p class="unprintable">Updated:
 <!-- timestamp start -->
-$Date: 2014/05/27 23:22:52 $
+$Date: 2014/05/29 10:44:34 $
 <!-- timestamp end -->
 </p>
 </div>



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]