www-commits
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

www planetfeeds.de.html distros/free-distros.de...


From: GNUN
Subject: www planetfeeds.de.html distros/free-distros.de...
Date: Fri, 31 Jan 2014 13:00:52 +0000

CVSROOT:        /web/www
Module name:    www
Changes by:     GNUN <gnun>     14/01/31 13:00:52

Modified files:
        .              : planetfeeds.de.html 
        distros        : free-distros.de.html 
                         free-system-distribution-guidelines.hr.html 
                         free-system-distribution-guidelines.pt-br.html 
                         free-system-distribution-guidelines.ro.html 
        distros/po     : free-distros.de-en.html 
        software       : recent-releases-include.de.html 
Added files:
        distros/po     : 
                         free-system-distribution-guidelines.hr-diff.html 
                         free-system-distribution-guidelines.pt-br-diff.html 
                         free-system-distribution-guidelines.ro-diff.html 

Log message:
        Automatic update by GNUnited Nations.

CVSWeb URLs:
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/planetfeeds.de.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.180&r2=1.181
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/distros/free-distros.de.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.57&r2=1.58
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/distros/free-system-distribution-guidelines.hr.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.4&r2=1.5
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/distros/free-system-distribution-guidelines.pt-br.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.14&r2=1.15
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/distros/free-system-distribution-guidelines.ro.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.3&r2=1.4
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/distros/po/free-distros.de-en.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.48&r2=1.49
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/distros/po/free-system-distribution-guidelines.hr-diff.html?cvsroot=www&rev=1.1
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/distros/po/free-system-distribution-guidelines.pt-br-diff.html?cvsroot=www&rev=1.1
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/distros/po/free-system-distribution-guidelines.ro-diff.html?cvsroot=www&rev=1.1
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/software/recent-releases-include.de.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.252&r2=1.253

Patches:
Index: planetfeeds.de.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/planetfeeds.de.html,v
retrieving revision 1.180
retrieving revision 1.181
diff -u -b -r1.180 -r1.181
--- planetfeeds.de.html 30 Jan 2014 05:59:06 -0000      1.180
+++ planetfeeds.de.html 31 Jan 2014 13:00:50 -0000      1.181
@@ -1,15 +1,13 @@
 
 <!-- Autogenerated by planetrss.pl 1.7 -->
-<p><a href='http://savannah.gnu.org/forum/forum.php?forum_id=7869'> GNU Xnee
-3.17 released</a>: We are pleased to announce the availability of GNU Xnee
-3.17 GNU Xnee is a suite of programs that can record, replay and distribute
-user actions under the X11 environme...  <a
-href='http://savannah.gnu.org/forum/forum.php?forum_id=7869'>more</a></p>
+<p><a href='http://savannah.gnu.org/forum/forum.php?forum_id=7869'>xnee @
+Savannah</a>: GNU Xnee 3.17 released. <a
+href='http://savannah.gnu.org/forum/forum.php?forum_id=7869'><small>[mehr]</small></a></p>
 <p><a
-href='http://www.fsf.org/blogs/community/as-free-software-users-we-need-to-speak-out-against-the-tpp'>
-As free software users, we need to speak out against the TPP</a>: You may
-already be involved in the international grassroots movement against the
-Trans-Pacific Partnership.</p>
-<p><a href='http://www.fsf.org/blogs/community/help-the-fsf-bury-windows-8'>
-Help the FSF bury Windows 8</a>: The widely-accepted failure of Windows 8
-provides a critical moment for the free software movement.</p>
+href='http://www.fsf.org/blogs/community/as-free-software-users-we-need-to-speak-out-against-the-tpp'>FSF
+Blogs</a>: As free software users, we need to speak out against the
+Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP). <a
+href='http://www.fsf.org/blogs/community/as-free-software-users-we-need-to-speak-out-against-the-tpp'><small>[mehr]</small></a></p>
+<p><a href='http://www.fsf.org/blogs/community/help-the-fsf-bury-windows-8'>FSF
+Blogs</a>: Help the FSF bury Windows 8 <a
+href='http://www.fsf.org/blogs/community/help-the-fsf-bury-windows-8'><small>[mehr]</small></a></p>

Index: distros/free-distros.de.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/distros/free-distros.de.html,v
retrieving revision 1.57
retrieving revision 1.58
diff -u -b -r1.57 -r1.58
--- distros/free-distros.de.html        1 Dec 2013 16:33:12 -0000       1.57
+++ distros/free-distros.de.html        31 Jan 2014 13:00:50 -0000      1.58
@@ -79,7 +79,7 @@
 mit finanzieller Unterstützung der FSF.</td></tr>
 
  <tr class="odd">
-   <td><a href="http://www.musix.org.ar";>
+   <td><a href="http://musix.najval.net/musix/isos/";>
        <img src="/graphics/distros-musix.png" alt="Musix GNU/Linux" /></a></td>
    <td>Musix ist eine auf Knoppix basierende GNU/Linux-Distribution, mit 
besonderem
 Schwerpunkt auf Audio-Produktion.</td></tr>
@@ -216,7 +216,8 @@
      
      There is more detail about copyright years in the GNU Maintainers
      Information document, www.gnu.org/prep/maintain. -->
-<p>Copyright &copy; 2011, 2012 Free Software Foundation, Inc.</p>
+<p>Copyright &copy; 2011, 2012<!--, 2013, 2014--> Free Software Foundation,
+Inc.</p>
 
 <p>Dieses Werk steht unter einer <a rel="license"
 href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/3.0/us/deed.de";>Creative
@@ -227,13 +228,13 @@
 <div class="translators-credits">
 
 <!--TRANSLATORS: Use space (SPC) as msgstr if you don't want credits.-->
-<strong>Übersetzung:</strong> Joerg Kohne, 2011, 2012, 2013.</div>
+<strong>Übersetzung:</strong> Joerg Kohne, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014.</div>
 
 
  <p><!-- timestamp start -->
 Aktualisierung:
 
-$Date: 2013/12/01 16:33:12 $
+$Date: 2014/01/31 13:00:50 $
 
 <!-- timestamp end -->
 </p>

Index: distros/free-system-distribution-guidelines.hr.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/distros/free-system-distribution-guidelines.hr.html,v
retrieving revision 1.4
retrieving revision 1.5
diff -u -b -r1.4 -r1.5
--- distros/free-system-distribution-guidelines.hr.html 31 Aug 2013 20:08:00 
-0000      1.4
+++ distros/free-system-distribution-guidelines.hr.html 31 Jan 2014 13:00:50 
-0000      1.5
@@ -14,6 +14,13 @@
 
 <!--#include 
virtual="/distros/po/free-system-distribution-guidelines.translist" -->
 <!--#include virtual="/server/banner.hr.html" -->
+<!--#set var="PO_FILE"
+ value='<a 
href="http://www.gnu.org/distros/po/free-system-distribution-guidelines.hr.po";>
+ http://www.gnu.org/distros/po/free-system-distribution-guidelines.hr.po</a>' 
-->
+ <!--#set var="ORIGINAL_FILE" 
value="/distros/free-system-distribution-guidelines.html" -->
+ <!--#set var="DIFF_FILE" 
value="/distros/po/free-system-distribution-guidelines.hr-diff.html" -->
+ <!--#set var="OUTDATED_SINCE" value="2013-12-02" -->
+ <!--#include virtual="/server/outdated.hr.html" -->
 <h2>Smjernice za distribucije slobodnog sustava</h2>
 
 <h3 id="introduction">Uvod</h3>
@@ -332,7 +339,7 @@
  <p><!-- timestamp start -->
 Zadnji put promijenjeno:
 
-$Date: 2013/08/31 20:08:00 $
+$Date: 2014/01/31 13:00:50 $
 
 <!-- timestamp end -->
 </p>

Index: distros/free-system-distribution-guidelines.pt-br.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/distros/free-system-distribution-guidelines.pt-br.html,v
retrieving revision 1.14
retrieving revision 1.15
diff -u -b -r1.14 -r1.15
--- distros/free-system-distribution-guidelines.pt-br.html      31 Aug 2013 
20:08:00 -0000      1.14
+++ distros/free-system-distribution-guidelines.pt-br.html      31 Jan 2014 
13:00:51 -0000      1.15
@@ -14,6 +14,13 @@
 
 <!--#include 
virtual="/distros/po/free-system-distribution-guidelines.translist" -->
 <!--#include virtual="/server/banner.pt-br.html" -->
+<!--#set var="PO_FILE"
+ value='<a 
href="http://www.gnu.org/distros/po/free-system-distribution-guidelines.pt-br.po";>
+ 
http://www.gnu.org/distros/po/free-system-distribution-guidelines.pt-br.po</a>' 
-->
+ <!--#set var="ORIGINAL_FILE" 
value="/distros/free-system-distribution-guidelines.html" -->
+ <!--#set var="DIFF_FILE" 
value="/distros/po/free-system-distribution-guidelines.pt-br-diff.html" -->
+ <!--#set var="OUTDATED_SINCE" value="2013-12-02" -->
+ <!--#include virtual="/server/outdated.pt-br.html" -->
 <h2>Diretrizes para Distribuições de Sistemas Livres</h2>
 
 <h3 id="introduction">Introdução</h3>
@@ -338,7 +345,7 @@
  <p><!-- timestamp start -->
 Última atualização: 
 
-$Date: 2013/08/31 20:08:00 $
+$Date: 2014/01/31 13:00:51 $
 
 <!-- timestamp end -->
 </p>

Index: distros/free-system-distribution-guidelines.ro.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/distros/free-system-distribution-guidelines.ro.html,v
retrieving revision 1.3
retrieving revision 1.4
diff -u -b -r1.3 -r1.4
--- distros/free-system-distribution-guidelines.ro.html 27 Nov 2013 14:59:54 
-0000      1.3
+++ distros/free-system-distribution-guidelines.ro.html 31 Jan 2014 13:00:51 
-0000      1.4
@@ -14,6 +14,13 @@
 
 <!--#include 
virtual="/distros/po/free-system-distribution-guidelines.translist" -->
 <!--#include virtual="/server/banner.ro.html" -->
+<!--#set var="PO_FILE"
+ value='<a 
href="http://www.gnu.org/distros/po/free-system-distribution-guidelines.ro.po";>
+ http://www.gnu.org/distros/po/free-system-distribution-guidelines.ro.po</a>' 
-->
+ <!--#set var="ORIGINAL_FILE" 
value="/distros/free-system-distribution-guidelines.html" -->
+ <!--#set var="DIFF_FILE" 
value="/distros/po/free-system-distribution-guidelines.ro-diff.html" -->
+ <!--#set var="OUTDATED_SINCE" value="2013-12-02" -->
+ <!--#include virtual="/server/outdated.ro.html" -->
 <h2>Recomandări pentru distribuțiile de sistem libere</h2>
 
 <h3 id="introduction">Introducere</h3>
@@ -340,7 +347,7 @@
  <p><!-- timestamp start -->
 Actualizat la:
 
-$Date: 2013/11/27 14:59:54 $
+$Date: 2014/01/31 13:00:51 $
 
 <!-- timestamp end -->
 </p>

Index: distros/po/free-distros.de-en.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/distros/po/free-distros.de-en.html,v
retrieving revision 1.48
retrieving revision 1.49
diff -u -b -r1.48 -r1.49
--- distros/po/free-distros.de-en.html  1 Dec 2013 16:33:14 -0000       1.48
+++ distros/po/free-distros.de-en.html  31 Jan 2014 13:00:51 -0000      1.49
@@ -71,7 +71,7 @@
        sponsorship from the FSF.</td></tr>
 
  <tr class="odd">
-   <td><a href="http://www.musix.org.ar";>
+   <td><a href="http://musix.najval.net/musix/isos/";>
        <img src="/graphics/distros-musix.png" alt="Musix GNU+Linux" /></a></td>
    <td>Musix, a GNU+Linux distribution based on Knoppix, with special
        emphasis on audio production.</td></tr>
@@ -195,7 +195,7 @@
 
 <p>Updated:
 <!-- timestamp start -->
-$Date: 2013/12/01 16:33:14 $
+$Date: 2014/01/31 13:00:51 $
 <!-- timestamp end -->
 </p>
 </div>

Index: software/recent-releases-include.de.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/software/recent-releases-include.de.html,v
retrieving revision 1.252
retrieving revision 1.253
diff -u -b -r1.252 -r1.253
--- software/recent-releases-include.de.html    30 Jan 2014 00:29:40 -0000      
1.252
+++ software/recent-releases-include.de.html    31 Jan 2014 13:00:52 -0000      
1.253
@@ -1,19 +1,18 @@
 <ul>
-<li><strong>January 29, 2014</strong>
+<li><strong>2014-01-29</strong>
 <ul>
 <li><a
 href="http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/info-gnu/2014-01/msg00016.html";>GNU
-Xnee 3.17 (‘Seeger') released</a>, <i>Henrik Sandklef</i>, 
<tt>19:03</tt></li>
+Xnee 3.17 (‚Seeger‘)</a>, <i>Henrik Sandklef</i>, <tt>19:03</tt></li>
 <li><a
 
href="http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/info-gnu/2014-01/msg00015.html";>Libgcrypt
-1.6.1 released</a>, <i>Werner Koch</i>, <tt>09:51</tt></li>
+1.6.1</a>, <i>Werner Koch</i>, <tt>09:51</tt></li>
 </ul></li>
-<li><strong>January 24, 2014</strong>
+<li><strong>2014-01-24</strong>
 <ul>
 <li><a
 href="http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/info-gnu/2014-01/msg00014.html";>GNU
-ccd2cue 0.3 released [stable]</a>, <i>Bruno Félix Rezende Ribeiro</i>,
-<tt>09:40</tt></li>
+CCD2CUE 0.3</a>, <i>Bruno Félix Rezende Ribeiro</i>, <tt>09:40</tt></li>
 </ul></li>
 <li><strong>2014-01-22</strong>
 <ul>
@@ -40,7 +39,7 @@
 <ul>
 <li><a
 
href="http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/info-gnu/2014-01/msg00009.html";>[Programmkorrektur]
-GNU MPC 1.0.2 („Fagus silvatica“)</a>, <i>Andreas Enge</i>, 
<tt>16:31</tt></li>
+GNU MPC 1.0.2 (‚Fagus silvatica‘)</a>, <i>Andreas Enge</i>, 
<tt>16:31</tt></li>
 </ul></li>
 <li><strong>2014-01-14</strong>
 <ul>

Index: distros/po/free-system-distribution-guidelines.hr-diff.html
===================================================================
RCS file: distros/po/free-system-distribution-guidelines.hr-diff.html
diff -N distros/po/free-system-distribution-guidelines.hr-diff.html
--- /dev/null   1 Jan 1970 00:00:00 -0000
+++ distros/po/free-system-distribution-guidelines.hr-diff.html 31 Jan 2014 
13:00:51 -0000      1.1
@@ -0,0 +1,337 @@
+<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Strict//EN"
+    "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-strict.dtd";>
+<!-- Generated by GNUN -->
+<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"; xml:lang="en" lang="en">
+<head>
+<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8" />
+<title>/distros/free-system-distribution-guidelines.html-diff</title>
+<style type="text/css">
+span.removed { background-color: #f22; color: #000; }
+span.inserted { background-color: #2f2; color: #000; }
+</style></head>
+<body><pre>
+&lt;!--#include virtual="/server/header.html" --&gt;
+&lt;!-- Parent-Version: 1.75 --&gt;
+&lt;title&gt;Guidelines for Free System Distributions - GNU Project - Free 
Software Foundation&lt;/title&gt;
+&lt;link rel="alternate" title="Free GNU/Linux distributions"
+      href="http://www.gnu.org/distros/distros.rss";
+      type="application/rss+xml" /&gt;
+&lt;!--#include 
virtual="/distros/po/free-system-distribution-guidelines.translist" --&gt;
+&lt;!--#include virtual="/server/banner.html" --&gt;
+&lt;h2&gt;Guidelines for Free System Distributions&lt;/h2&gt;
+
+&lt;h3 id="introduction"&gt;Introduction&lt;/h3&gt;
+
+&lt;p&gt;The purpose of these guidelines is to explain what it means for an
+installable system distribution (such as a GNU/Linux distribution) to
+qualify as free, and help distribution developers make their
+distributions qualify.&lt;/p&gt;
+
+&lt;p&gt;These guidelines are not complete.  We have mentioned the issues we
+are aware of now, but we're sure there are more.  We will add them
+when we come across them.&lt;/p&gt;
+
+&lt;p&gt;We would like to thank the Fedora Project for their help in focusing
+these policies, and allowing us to use their own distribution license
+guidelines as a basis for this document.&lt;/p&gt;
+
+&lt;h3 id="complete-distros"&gt;Complete Distros&lt;/h3&gt;
+
+&lt;p&gt;Our list of distributions is a guide for what to install in a
+computer.  Therefore, it only includes distributions that are complete
+in themselves and ready to use.  If a distribution is incomplete
+&mdash; if using it requires further work or presupposes installing
+other software as well &mdash; then it doesn't belong in this list,
+even if it is free software.&lt;/p&gt;
+
+&lt;h3 id="license-rules"&gt;License Rules&lt;/h3&gt;
+
+&lt;p&gt;&ldquo;Information for practical use&rdquo;
+includes software, documentation, fonts, and other data that has
+direct functional applications.  It does not include artistic works
+that have an aesthetic (rather than functional) purpose, or statements
+of opinion or judgment.&lt;/p&gt;
+
+&lt;p&gt;All information for practical use in a free distribution must be
+available in source form.  (&ldquo;Source&rdquo; means the form of the
+information that is preferred for making changes to it.)&lt;/p&gt;
+
+&lt;p&gt;The information, and the source, must be provided under an
+appropriate free license.  We list the ones we have evaluated
+on &lt;a class="reference" href="/licenses/license-list.html"&gt;our license
+list&lt;/a&gt;, with separate sections for licenses that are suitable for
+software, documentation, fonts, and other useful works.  If such a
+work is released under multiple licenses, at least one of which is
+free, it can be included in the system; the system developers just
+need to follow the terms of the available free license(s) when they
+distribute and/or modify it.&lt;/p&gt;
+
+&lt;p&gt;A free system distribution must not steer users towards obtaining
+any nonfree information for practical use, or encourage them to do so.
+The system should have no repositories for nonfree software and no
+specific recipes for installation of particular nonfree programs. Nor
+should the distribution refer to third-party repositories that are not
+committed to only including free software; even if they only have free
+software today, that may not be true tomorrow.  Programs in the system
+should not suggest installing nonfree plugins, documentation, and so
+on.&lt;/p&gt;
+
+&lt;p&gt;A free system distribution should be self-hosting.  This means that
+you must be able to develop and build the system with tools that the
+system provides you.  As a result, a free system distribution cannot
+include free software that can only be built by using nonfree
+software.&lt;/p&gt;
+
+&lt;p&gt;There's a lot of code in most free system distributions today; the
+amount of effort it would take to audit it all directly is impractical
+for most teams.  In the past, some nonfree code has accidentally been
+included in free system distributions.  We don't de-list distributions
+because of this; instead, we only ask that a distribution put forth a
+good faith effort to avoid including nonfree software, and commit
+itself to removing such programs if they are discovered later.&lt;/p&gt;
+
+&lt;p&gt;Certain kinds of license situations merit special attention for people
+creating or considering free software distributions; those are
+discussed in the sections below.&lt;/p&gt;
+
+&lt;h3 id="nonfree-firmware"&gt;Nonfree Firmware&lt;/h3&gt;
+
+&lt;p&gt;Some applications and drivers require firmware to function, and
+sometimes that firmware is distributed only in object code form, under
+a nonfree license.  We call these firmware programs
+&ldquo;blobs.&rdquo; On most GNU/Linux systems, you'll typically find
+these accompanying some drivers in the kernel Linux.  Such firmware
+should be removed from a free system distribution.&lt;/p&gt;
+
+&lt;p&gt;Blobs can take many forms.  Sometimes, they will be provided in
+separate files.  Other times, they may be incorporated into the source
+of the driver itself&mdash;for example, it could be encoded as a large
+array of numbers.  But no matter how it's encoded, any nonfree
+firmware needs to be removed from a free system.&lt;/p&gt;
+
+&lt;p&gt;(To be clear, not every array of numbers in a driver is firmware.
+It's important to understand the purpose of the data before deciding
+whether or not it's appropriate for a free system.)&lt;/p&gt;
+
+&lt;p&gt;Brian Brazil, Jeff Moe, and Alexandre Oliva have developed a series
+of &lt;a class="reference"
+href="http://www.fsfla.org/svn/fsfla/software/linux-libre/scripts/"&gt;scripts
+to remove nonfree firmware&lt;/a&gt; from a stock version of the Linux kernel.
+You may find them helpful if you would like to develop your own free
+GNU/Linux distribution&mdash;although we recommend joining development
+of an existing free distro rather than fragmenting effort by starting a
+new one.  The complete source for a blob-free version of the Linux
+kernel is also available; you can learn more about this project from the
+&lt;a class="reference" href="http://directory.fsf.org/project/linux/"&gt;Free
+Software Directory&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
+
+&lt;h3 id="non-functional-data"&gt;Non-functional Data&lt;/h3&gt;
+
+&lt;p&gt;Data that isn't functional, that doesn't do a practical job, is
+more of an adornment to the system's software than a part of it.
+Thus, we don't insist on the free license criteria for non-functional
+data.  It can be included in a free system distribution as long as its
+license gives you permission to copy and redistribute, both for
+commercial and non-commercial purposes.  For example, some game
+engines released under the GNU GPL have accompanying game
+information&mdash;a fictional world map, game graphics, and so
+on&mdash;released under such a verbatim-distribution license.  This
+kind of data can be part of a free system distribution, even though
+its license does not qualify as free, because it is non-functional.&lt;/p&gt;
+
+&lt;h3 id="trademarks"&gt;Trademarks&lt;/h3&gt;
+
+&lt;p&gt;Trademarks are associated with some software.  For example, the
+name of a program may be trademarked, or its interface may display a
+trademarked logo.  Often, the use of these marks will be controlled
+in some way; in particular, developers are commonly asked to remove
+references to the trademark from the software when they modify
+it.&lt;/p&gt;
+
+&lt;p&gt;In extreme cases, these restrictions may effectively render the
+program nonfree.  It is unfair for someone to ask you to remove a
+trademark from modified code if that trademark is scattered all
+throughout the original source.  As long as the practical
+requirements are reasonable, however, free system distributions may
+include these programs, either with or without the trademarks.&lt;/p&gt;
+
+&lt;p&gt;Similarly, the distribution itself may hold particular trademarks.
+It is not a problem if modification requires removal of these
+trademarks, as long as they can readily be removed without losing
+functionality.&lt;/p&gt;
+
+&lt;p&gt;However, it is unacceptable to use trademarks to restrict verbatim
+copying and redistribution of the whole distribution, or any part.&lt;/p&gt;
+
+&lt;h3 id="documentation"&gt;Documentation&lt;/h3&gt;
+
+&lt;p&gt;All the documentation in a free system distribution must be released
+under an appropriate free license.  Additionally, it must take care
+not to recommend nonfree software.&lt;/p&gt;
+
+&lt;p&gt;In general, something that helps people who already use nonfree
+software to use the free software better with it is acceptable, but
+something that encourages users of the free software to install
+nonfree software is not.&lt;/p&gt;
+
+&lt;p&gt;For example, a free system distribution may have documentation for
+users setting up dual boot systems.  It could explain how to access
+filesystems of the proprietary operating system, import settings
+from it, and so on.  That would be helping people install a free
+system distribution on a machine which already has proprietary
+software, which is good.&lt;/p&gt;
+
+&lt;p&gt;What would be unacceptable is for the documentation to give people
+instructions for installing a nonfree program on the system, or
+mention conveniences they might gain by doing so.&lt;/p&gt;
+
+&lt;p&gt;For a borderline case, a clear and serious exhortation not to use the
+nonfree program would move it to the acceptable side of the line.&lt;/p&gt;
+
+&lt;h3 id="patents"&gt;Patents&lt;/h3&gt;
+
+&lt;p&gt;It is effectively impossible for free software developers and
+distributors to know whether or not a given piece of software
+infringes any patents: there are too many of them, they vary from
+country to country, they're often worded so as to make it hard to tell
+what they do or don't cover, and it isn't easy to tell which ones are
+valid.  Therefore, we don't generally ask free system distributions to
+exclude software because of possible threats from patents.  On the
+other hand, we also don't object if a distributor chooses to omit some
+software in order to avoid patent risk.&lt;/p&gt;
+
+&lt;h3 <span class="inserted"><ins><em>id="no-malware"&gt;No Malware&lt;/h3&gt;
+
+&lt;p&gt;The distro must contain no DRM, no back doors, and no 
spyware.&lt;/p&gt;
+
+&lt;h3</em></ins></span> id="mistakes"&gt;Commitment to Correct 
Mistakes&lt;/h3&gt;
+
+&lt;p&gt;Most distribution development teams don't have the resources to
+exhaustively check that their distribution meet all these criteria.
+Neither do we.  So we expect <span 
class="removed"><del><strong>developers</strong></del></span> <span 
class="inserted"><ins><em>distros</em></ins></span> to occasionally <span 
class="removed"><del><strong>make mistakes
+that let some</strong></del></span> <span class="inserted"><ins><em>contain 
mistakes:</em></ins></span>
+nonfree software <span class="removed"><del><strong>slip</strong></del></span> 
<span class="inserted"><ins><em>that slipped</em></ins></span> through, <span 
class="removed"><del><strong>and we</strong></del></span> <span 
class="inserted"><ins><em>etc.  We</em></ins></span> don't reject a
+distribution <span class="removed"><del><strong>just for 
that.</strong></del></span> <span class="inserted"><ins><em>over 
mistakes.</em></ins></span>  Our requirement is for the distribution
+developers to have a firm commitment to promptly correct any mistakes
+that are reported to them.&lt;/p&gt;
+
+&lt;h3 id="maintenance"&gt;Maintenance&lt;/h3&gt;
+
+&lt;p&gt;To be listed, a distribution should be actively maintained,
+and should give the GNU Project a clear and specific way to report problems
+of nonfree software that we find out about.  It should also
+inform us when the problems we have reported are fixed.&lt;/p&gt;
+
+&lt;h3 id="name-confusion"&gt;Name Confusion&lt;/h3&gt;
+
+&lt;p&gt;We will not list a distribution whose name makes confusion with
+nonfree distributions likely.  For example, if Foobar Light is a free
+distribution and Foobar is a nonfree distribution, we will not list
+Foobar Light.  This is because we expect that the distinction between
+the two would be lost in the process of communicating the message.&lt;/p&gt;
+
+&lt;h3 id="upstream"&gt;Contacting Upstream If You're Downstream&lt;/h3&gt;
+
+&lt;p&gt;For distro developers (or anyone else) who have sent an important bug
+report for a GNU package: if it has gone unheeded by the package
+maintainer after a reasonable time (please allow at least two weeks),
+you can escalate the bug by writing to &lt;address@hidden&gt;.
+This is especially warranted if you can't find evidence of recent
+activity by the package maintainer.&lt;/p&gt;
+
+&lt;h3 id="teaching"&gt;Please Teach Users about Free Software&lt;/h3&gt;
+
+&lt;p&gt;To establish lasting freedom, just giving users freedom isn't
+sufficient.  It is necessary also to teach them to understand what it
+means and to demand it.  Thus, we suggest and urge that free distros
+announce prominently on the screen, before login and on the default
+desktop after login, a prominent statement about freedom, such as
+&ldquo;This system is freedom-respecting free/libre software&rdquo; or
+something comparable, and to present a link or icon pointing at
+gnu.org or gnu.org/philosophy for further information about the
+issue.&lt;/p&gt;
+
+&lt;h3 id="final-notes"&gt;Final Notes&lt;/h3&gt;
+
+&lt;p&gt;We maintain a list of the &lt;a 
href="/distros/free-distros.html"&gt;free
+system distributions&lt;/a&gt; we know about.  If you know about a free
+distribution that isn't listed there, please ask its developers write
+to &lt;&lt;a class="reference"
+href="mailto:address@hidden"&gt;address@hidden&lt;/a&gt;&gt; with a 
description of
+their system and a link to their web page.&lt;/p&gt;
+
+&lt;p&gt;Our list consists of systems based on GNU which acknowledge that
+they are based on GNU.  At present, we know of no other systems
+that would qualify.  If someday there is one, we will list it,
+but not necessarily in same way.&lt;/p&gt;
+
+&lt;p&gt;If you have questions or comments about these guidelines
+themselves, feel free to send those to &lt;&lt;a class="reference"
+href="mailto:address@hidden"&gt;address@hidden&lt;/a&gt;&gt;.  We hope
+that they help everyone better understand the issues that are important
+for free system distributions, and we look forward to promoting more
+of them in the future.&lt;/p&gt;
+
+&lt;/div&gt;&lt;!-- for id="content", starts in the include above --&gt;
+&lt;!--#include virtual="/server/footer.html" --&gt;
+&lt;div id="footer"&gt;
+
+&lt;p&gt;Please send general FSF &amp; GNU inquiries to
+&lt;a href="mailto:address@hidden"&gt;&lt;address@hidden&gt;&lt;/a&gt;.
+There are also &lt;a href="/contact/"&gt;other ways to contact&lt;/a&gt;
+the FSF.  Broken links and other corrections or suggestions can be sent
+to &lt;a 
href="mailto:address@hidden"&gt;&lt;address@hidden&gt;&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
+
+&lt;p&gt;&lt;!-- TRANSLATORS: Ignore the original text in this paragraph,
+        replace it with the translation of these two:
+
+        We work hard and do our best to provide accurate, good quality
+        translations.  However, we are not exempt from imperfection.
+        Please send your comments and general suggestions in this regard
+        to &lt;a href="mailto:address@hidden"&gt;
+        &lt;address@hidden&gt;&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
+
+        &lt;p&gt;For information on coordinating and submitting translations of
+        our web pages, see &lt;a
+        href="/server/standards/README.translations.html"&gt;Translations
+        README&lt;/a&gt;. --&gt;
+Please see the &lt;a
+href="/server/standards/README.translations.html"&gt;Translations
+README&lt;/a&gt; for information on coordinating and submitting translations
+of this article.&lt;/p&gt;
+
+&lt;!-- Regarding copyright, in general, standalone pages (as opposed to
+     files generated as part of manuals) on the GNU web server should
+     be under CC BY-ND 3.0 US.  Please do NOT change or remove this
+     without talking with the webmasters or licensing team first.
+     Please make sure the copyright date is consistent with the
+     document.  For web pages, it is ok to list just the latest year the
+     document was modified, or published.
+     
+     If you wish to list earlier years, that is ok too.
+     Either "2001, 2002, 2003" or "2001-2003" are ok for specifying
+     years, as long as each year in the range is in fact a copyrightable
+     year, i.e., a year in which the document was published (including
+     being publicly visible on the web or in a revision control system).
+     
+     There is more detail about copyright years in the GNU Maintainers
+     Information document, www.gnu.org/prep/maintain. --&gt;
+
+&lt;p&gt;Copyright &copy; 2010 Free Software Foundation, Inc.&lt;/p&gt;
+
+&lt;p&gt;This page is licensed under a &lt;a rel="license"
+href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/3.0/us/"&gt;Creative
+Commons Attribution-NoDerivs 3.0 United States License&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
+
+&lt;!--#include virtual="/server/bottom-notes.html" --&gt;
+
+&lt;p&gt;Updated:
+&lt;!-- timestamp start --&gt;
+$Date: 2014/01/31 13:00:51 $
+&lt;!-- timestamp end --&gt;
+&lt;/p&gt;
+&lt;/div&gt;
+&lt;/div&gt;
+&lt;/body&gt;
+&lt;/html&gt;
+</pre></body></html>

Index: distros/po/free-system-distribution-guidelines.pt-br-diff.html
===================================================================
RCS file: distros/po/free-system-distribution-guidelines.pt-br-diff.html
diff -N distros/po/free-system-distribution-guidelines.pt-br-diff.html
--- /dev/null   1 Jan 1970 00:00:00 -0000
+++ distros/po/free-system-distribution-guidelines.pt-br-diff.html      31 Jan 
2014 13:00:51 -0000      1.1
@@ -0,0 +1,337 @@
+<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Strict//EN"
+    "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-strict.dtd";>
+<!-- Generated by GNUN -->
+<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"; xml:lang="en" lang="en">
+<head>
+<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8" />
+<title>/distros/free-system-distribution-guidelines.html-diff</title>
+<style type="text/css">
+span.removed { background-color: #f22; color: #000; }
+span.inserted { background-color: #2f2; color: #000; }
+</style></head>
+<body><pre>
+&lt;!--#include virtual="/server/header.html" --&gt;
+&lt;!-- Parent-Version: 1.75 --&gt;
+&lt;title&gt;Guidelines for Free System Distributions - GNU Project - Free 
Software Foundation&lt;/title&gt;
+&lt;link rel="alternate" title="Free GNU/Linux distributions"
+      href="http://www.gnu.org/distros/distros.rss";
+      type="application/rss+xml" /&gt;
+&lt;!--#include 
virtual="/distros/po/free-system-distribution-guidelines.translist" --&gt;
+&lt;!--#include virtual="/server/banner.html" --&gt;
+&lt;h2&gt;Guidelines for Free System Distributions&lt;/h2&gt;
+
+&lt;h3 id="introduction"&gt;Introduction&lt;/h3&gt;
+
+&lt;p&gt;The purpose of these guidelines is to explain what it means for an
+installable system distribution (such as a GNU/Linux distribution) to
+qualify as free, and help distribution developers make their
+distributions qualify.&lt;/p&gt;
+
+&lt;p&gt;These guidelines are not complete.  We have mentioned the issues we
+are aware of now, but we're sure there are more.  We will add them
+when we come across them.&lt;/p&gt;
+
+&lt;p&gt;We would like to thank the Fedora Project for their help in focusing
+these policies, and allowing us to use their own distribution license
+guidelines as a basis for this document.&lt;/p&gt;
+
+&lt;h3 id="complete-distros"&gt;Complete Distros&lt;/h3&gt;
+
+&lt;p&gt;Our list of distributions is a guide for what to install in a
+computer.  Therefore, it only includes distributions that are complete
+in themselves and ready to use.  If a distribution is incomplete
+&mdash; if using it requires further work or presupposes installing
+other software as well &mdash; then it doesn't belong in this list,
+even if it is free software.&lt;/p&gt;
+
+&lt;h3 id="license-rules"&gt;License Rules&lt;/h3&gt;
+
+&lt;p&gt;&ldquo;Information for practical use&rdquo;
+includes software, documentation, fonts, and other data that has
+direct functional applications.  It does not include artistic works
+that have an aesthetic (rather than functional) purpose, or statements
+of opinion or judgment.&lt;/p&gt;
+
+&lt;p&gt;All information for practical use in a free distribution must be
+available in source form.  (&ldquo;Source&rdquo; means the form of the
+information that is preferred for making changes to it.)&lt;/p&gt;
+
+&lt;p&gt;The information, and the source, must be provided under an
+appropriate free license.  We list the ones we have evaluated
+on &lt;a class="reference" href="/licenses/license-list.html"&gt;our license
+list&lt;/a&gt;, with separate sections for licenses that are suitable for
+software, documentation, fonts, and other useful works.  If such a
+work is released under multiple licenses, at least one of which is
+free, it can be included in the system; the system developers just
+need to follow the terms of the available free license(s) when they
+distribute and/or modify it.&lt;/p&gt;
+
+&lt;p&gt;A free system distribution must not steer users towards obtaining
+any nonfree information for practical use, or encourage them to do so.
+The system should have no repositories for nonfree software and no
+specific recipes for installation of particular nonfree programs. Nor
+should the distribution refer to third-party repositories that are not
+committed to only including free software; even if they only have free
+software today, that may not be true tomorrow.  Programs in the system
+should not suggest installing nonfree plugins, documentation, and so
+on.&lt;/p&gt;
+
+&lt;p&gt;A free system distribution should be self-hosting.  This means that
+you must be able to develop and build the system with tools that the
+system provides you.  As a result, a free system distribution cannot
+include free software that can only be built by using nonfree
+software.&lt;/p&gt;
+
+&lt;p&gt;There's a lot of code in most free system distributions today; the
+amount of effort it would take to audit it all directly is impractical
+for most teams.  In the past, some nonfree code has accidentally been
+included in free system distributions.  We don't de-list distributions
+because of this; instead, we only ask that a distribution put forth a
+good faith effort to avoid including nonfree software, and commit
+itself to removing such programs if they are discovered later.&lt;/p&gt;
+
+&lt;p&gt;Certain kinds of license situations merit special attention for people
+creating or considering free software distributions; those are
+discussed in the sections below.&lt;/p&gt;
+
+&lt;h3 id="nonfree-firmware"&gt;Nonfree Firmware&lt;/h3&gt;
+
+&lt;p&gt;Some applications and drivers require firmware to function, and
+sometimes that firmware is distributed only in object code form, under
+a nonfree license.  We call these firmware programs
+&ldquo;blobs.&rdquo; On most GNU/Linux systems, you'll typically find
+these accompanying some drivers in the kernel Linux.  Such firmware
+should be removed from a free system distribution.&lt;/p&gt;
+
+&lt;p&gt;Blobs can take many forms.  Sometimes, they will be provided in
+separate files.  Other times, they may be incorporated into the source
+of the driver itself&mdash;for example, it could be encoded as a large
+array of numbers.  But no matter how it's encoded, any nonfree
+firmware needs to be removed from a free system.&lt;/p&gt;
+
+&lt;p&gt;(To be clear, not every array of numbers in a driver is firmware.
+It's important to understand the purpose of the data before deciding
+whether or not it's appropriate for a free system.)&lt;/p&gt;
+
+&lt;p&gt;Brian Brazil, Jeff Moe, and Alexandre Oliva have developed a series
+of &lt;a class="reference"
+href="http://www.fsfla.org/svn/fsfla/software/linux-libre/scripts/"&gt;scripts
+to remove nonfree firmware&lt;/a&gt; from a stock version of the Linux kernel.
+You may find them helpful if you would like to develop your own free
+GNU/Linux distribution&mdash;although we recommend joining development
+of an existing free distro rather than fragmenting effort by starting a
+new one.  The complete source for a blob-free version of the Linux
+kernel is also available; you can learn more about this project from the
+&lt;a class="reference" href="http://directory.fsf.org/project/linux/"&gt;Free
+Software Directory&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
+
+&lt;h3 id="non-functional-data"&gt;Non-functional Data&lt;/h3&gt;
+
+&lt;p&gt;Data that isn't functional, that doesn't do a practical job, is
+more of an adornment to the system's software than a part of it.
+Thus, we don't insist on the free license criteria for non-functional
+data.  It can be included in a free system distribution as long as its
+license gives you permission to copy and redistribute, both for
+commercial and non-commercial purposes.  For example, some game
+engines released under the GNU GPL have accompanying game
+information&mdash;a fictional world map, game graphics, and so
+on&mdash;released under such a verbatim-distribution license.  This
+kind of data can be part of a free system distribution, even though
+its license does not qualify as free, because it is non-functional.&lt;/p&gt;
+
+&lt;h3 id="trademarks"&gt;Trademarks&lt;/h3&gt;
+
+&lt;p&gt;Trademarks are associated with some software.  For example, the
+name of a program may be trademarked, or its interface may display a
+trademarked logo.  Often, the use of these marks will be controlled
+in some way; in particular, developers are commonly asked to remove
+references to the trademark from the software when they modify
+it.&lt;/p&gt;
+
+&lt;p&gt;In extreme cases, these restrictions may effectively render the
+program nonfree.  It is unfair for someone to ask you to remove a
+trademark from modified code if that trademark is scattered all
+throughout the original source.  As long as the practical
+requirements are reasonable, however, free system distributions may
+include these programs, either with or without the trademarks.&lt;/p&gt;
+
+&lt;p&gt;Similarly, the distribution itself may hold particular trademarks.
+It is not a problem if modification requires removal of these
+trademarks, as long as they can readily be removed without losing
+functionality.&lt;/p&gt;
+
+&lt;p&gt;However, it is unacceptable to use trademarks to restrict verbatim
+copying and redistribution of the whole distribution, or any part.&lt;/p&gt;
+
+&lt;h3 id="documentation"&gt;Documentation&lt;/h3&gt;
+
+&lt;p&gt;All the documentation in a free system distribution must be released
+under an appropriate free license.  Additionally, it must take care
+not to recommend nonfree software.&lt;/p&gt;
+
+&lt;p&gt;In general, something that helps people who already use nonfree
+software to use the free software better with it is acceptable, but
+something that encourages users of the free software to install
+nonfree software is not.&lt;/p&gt;
+
+&lt;p&gt;For example, a free system distribution may have documentation for
+users setting up dual boot systems.  It could explain how to access
+filesystems of the proprietary operating system, import settings
+from it, and so on.  That would be helping people install a free
+system distribution on a machine which already has proprietary
+software, which is good.&lt;/p&gt;
+
+&lt;p&gt;What would be unacceptable is for the documentation to give people
+instructions for installing a nonfree program on the system, or
+mention conveniences they might gain by doing so.&lt;/p&gt;
+
+&lt;p&gt;For a borderline case, a clear and serious exhortation not to use the
+nonfree program would move it to the acceptable side of the line.&lt;/p&gt;
+
+&lt;h3 id="patents"&gt;Patents&lt;/h3&gt;
+
+&lt;p&gt;It is effectively impossible for free software developers and
+distributors to know whether or not a given piece of software
+infringes any patents: there are too many of them, they vary from
+country to country, they're often worded so as to make it hard to tell
+what they do or don't cover, and it isn't easy to tell which ones are
+valid.  Therefore, we don't generally ask free system distributions to
+exclude software because of possible threats from patents.  On the
+other hand, we also don't object if a distributor chooses to omit some
+software in order to avoid patent risk.&lt;/p&gt;
+
+&lt;h3 <span class="inserted"><ins><em>id="no-malware"&gt;No Malware&lt;/h3&gt;
+
+&lt;p&gt;The distro must contain no DRM, no back doors, and no 
spyware.&lt;/p&gt;
+
+&lt;h3</em></ins></span> id="mistakes"&gt;Commitment to Correct 
Mistakes&lt;/h3&gt;
+
+&lt;p&gt;Most distribution development teams don't have the resources to
+exhaustively check that their distribution meet all these criteria.
+Neither do we.  So we expect <span 
class="removed"><del><strong>developers</strong></del></span> <span 
class="inserted"><ins><em>distros</em></ins></span> to occasionally <span 
class="removed"><del><strong>make mistakes
+that let some</strong></del></span> <span class="inserted"><ins><em>contain 
mistakes:</em></ins></span>
+nonfree software <span class="removed"><del><strong>slip</strong></del></span> 
<span class="inserted"><ins><em>that slipped</em></ins></span> through, <span 
class="removed"><del><strong>and we</strong></del></span> <span 
class="inserted"><ins><em>etc.  We</em></ins></span> don't reject a
+distribution <span class="removed"><del><strong>just for 
that.</strong></del></span> <span class="inserted"><ins><em>over 
mistakes.</em></ins></span>  Our requirement is for the distribution
+developers to have a firm commitment to promptly correct any mistakes
+that are reported to them.&lt;/p&gt;
+
+&lt;h3 id="maintenance"&gt;Maintenance&lt;/h3&gt;
+
+&lt;p&gt;To be listed, a distribution should be actively maintained,
+and should give the GNU Project a clear and specific way to report problems
+of nonfree software that we find out about.  It should also
+inform us when the problems we have reported are fixed.&lt;/p&gt;
+
+&lt;h3 id="name-confusion"&gt;Name Confusion&lt;/h3&gt;
+
+&lt;p&gt;We will not list a distribution whose name makes confusion with
+nonfree distributions likely.  For example, if Foobar Light is a free
+distribution and Foobar is a nonfree distribution, we will not list
+Foobar Light.  This is because we expect that the distinction between
+the two would be lost in the process of communicating the message.&lt;/p&gt;
+
+&lt;h3 id="upstream"&gt;Contacting Upstream If You're Downstream&lt;/h3&gt;
+
+&lt;p&gt;For distro developers (or anyone else) who have sent an important bug
+report for a GNU package: if it has gone unheeded by the package
+maintainer after a reasonable time (please allow at least two weeks),
+you can escalate the bug by writing to &lt;address@hidden&gt;.
+This is especially warranted if you can't find evidence of recent
+activity by the package maintainer.&lt;/p&gt;
+
+&lt;h3 id="teaching"&gt;Please Teach Users about Free Software&lt;/h3&gt;
+
+&lt;p&gt;To establish lasting freedom, just giving users freedom isn't
+sufficient.  It is necessary also to teach them to understand what it
+means and to demand it.  Thus, we suggest and urge that free distros
+announce prominently on the screen, before login and on the default
+desktop after login, a prominent statement about freedom, such as
+&ldquo;This system is freedom-respecting free/libre software&rdquo; or
+something comparable, and to present a link or icon pointing at
+gnu.org or gnu.org/philosophy for further information about the
+issue.&lt;/p&gt;
+
+&lt;h3 id="final-notes"&gt;Final Notes&lt;/h3&gt;
+
+&lt;p&gt;We maintain a list of the &lt;a 
href="/distros/free-distros.html"&gt;free
+system distributions&lt;/a&gt; we know about.  If you know about a free
+distribution that isn't listed there, please ask its developers write
+to &lt;&lt;a class="reference"
+href="mailto:address@hidden"&gt;address@hidden&lt;/a&gt;&gt; with a 
description of
+their system and a link to their web page.&lt;/p&gt;
+
+&lt;p&gt;Our list consists of systems based on GNU which acknowledge that
+they are based on GNU.  At present, we know of no other systems
+that would qualify.  If someday there is one, we will list it,
+but not necessarily in same way.&lt;/p&gt;
+
+&lt;p&gt;If you have questions or comments about these guidelines
+themselves, feel free to send those to &lt;&lt;a class="reference"
+href="mailto:address@hidden"&gt;address@hidden&lt;/a&gt;&gt;.  We hope
+that they help everyone better understand the issues that are important
+for free system distributions, and we look forward to promoting more
+of them in the future.&lt;/p&gt;
+
+&lt;/div&gt;&lt;!-- for id="content", starts in the include above --&gt;
+&lt;!--#include virtual="/server/footer.html" --&gt;
+&lt;div id="footer"&gt;
+
+&lt;p&gt;Please send general FSF &amp; GNU inquiries to
+&lt;a href="mailto:address@hidden"&gt;&lt;address@hidden&gt;&lt;/a&gt;.
+There are also &lt;a href="/contact/"&gt;other ways to contact&lt;/a&gt;
+the FSF.  Broken links and other corrections or suggestions can be sent
+to &lt;a 
href="mailto:address@hidden"&gt;&lt;address@hidden&gt;&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
+
+&lt;p&gt;&lt;!-- TRANSLATORS: Ignore the original text in this paragraph,
+        replace it with the translation of these two:
+
+        We work hard and do our best to provide accurate, good quality
+        translations.  However, we are not exempt from imperfection.
+        Please send your comments and general suggestions in this regard
+        to &lt;a href="mailto:address@hidden"&gt;
+        &lt;address@hidden&gt;&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
+
+        &lt;p&gt;For information on coordinating and submitting translations of
+        our web pages, see &lt;a
+        href="/server/standards/README.translations.html"&gt;Translations
+        README&lt;/a&gt;. --&gt;
+Please see the &lt;a
+href="/server/standards/README.translations.html"&gt;Translations
+README&lt;/a&gt; for information on coordinating and submitting translations
+of this article.&lt;/p&gt;
+
+&lt;!-- Regarding copyright, in general, standalone pages (as opposed to
+     files generated as part of manuals) on the GNU web server should
+     be under CC BY-ND 3.0 US.  Please do NOT change or remove this
+     without talking with the webmasters or licensing team first.
+     Please make sure the copyright date is consistent with the
+     document.  For web pages, it is ok to list just the latest year the
+     document was modified, or published.
+     
+     If you wish to list earlier years, that is ok too.
+     Either "2001, 2002, 2003" or "2001-2003" are ok for specifying
+     years, as long as each year in the range is in fact a copyrightable
+     year, i.e., a year in which the document was published (including
+     being publicly visible on the web or in a revision control system).
+     
+     There is more detail about copyright years in the GNU Maintainers
+     Information document, www.gnu.org/prep/maintain. --&gt;
+
+&lt;p&gt;Copyright &copy; 2010 Free Software Foundation, Inc.&lt;/p&gt;
+
+&lt;p&gt;This page is licensed under a &lt;a rel="license"
+href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/3.0/us/"&gt;Creative
+Commons Attribution-NoDerivs 3.0 United States License&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
+
+&lt;!--#include virtual="/server/bottom-notes.html" --&gt;
+
+&lt;p&gt;Updated:
+&lt;!-- timestamp start --&gt;
+$Date: 2014/01/31 13:00:51 $
+&lt;!-- timestamp end --&gt;
+&lt;/p&gt;
+&lt;/div&gt;
+&lt;/div&gt;
+&lt;/body&gt;
+&lt;/html&gt;
+</pre></body></html>

Index: distros/po/free-system-distribution-guidelines.ro-diff.html
===================================================================
RCS file: distros/po/free-system-distribution-guidelines.ro-diff.html
diff -N distros/po/free-system-distribution-guidelines.ro-diff.html
--- /dev/null   1 Jan 1970 00:00:00 -0000
+++ distros/po/free-system-distribution-guidelines.ro-diff.html 31 Jan 2014 
13:00:51 -0000      1.1
@@ -0,0 +1,337 @@
+<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Strict//EN"
+    "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-strict.dtd";>
+<!-- Generated by GNUN -->
+<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"; xml:lang="en" lang="en">
+<head>
+<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8" />
+<title>/distros/free-system-distribution-guidelines.html-diff</title>
+<style type="text/css">
+span.removed { background-color: #f22; color: #000; }
+span.inserted { background-color: #2f2; color: #000; }
+</style></head>
+<body><pre>
+&lt;!--#include virtual="/server/header.html" --&gt;
+&lt;!-- Parent-Version: 1.75 --&gt;
+&lt;title&gt;Guidelines for Free System Distributions - GNU Project - Free 
Software Foundation&lt;/title&gt;
+&lt;link rel="alternate" title="Free GNU/Linux distributions"
+      href="http://www.gnu.org/distros/distros.rss";
+      type="application/rss+xml" /&gt;
+&lt;!--#include 
virtual="/distros/po/free-system-distribution-guidelines.translist" --&gt;
+&lt;!--#include virtual="/server/banner.html" --&gt;
+&lt;h2&gt;Guidelines for Free System Distributions&lt;/h2&gt;
+
+&lt;h3 id="introduction"&gt;Introduction&lt;/h3&gt;
+
+&lt;p&gt;The purpose of these guidelines is to explain what it means for an
+installable system distribution (such as a GNU/Linux distribution) to
+qualify as free, and help distribution developers make their
+distributions qualify.&lt;/p&gt;
+
+&lt;p&gt;These guidelines are not complete.  We have mentioned the issues we
+are aware of now, but we're sure there are more.  We will add them
+when we come across them.&lt;/p&gt;
+
+&lt;p&gt;We would like to thank the Fedora Project for their help in focusing
+these policies, and allowing us to use their own distribution license
+guidelines as a basis for this document.&lt;/p&gt;
+
+&lt;h3 id="complete-distros"&gt;Complete Distros&lt;/h3&gt;
+
+&lt;p&gt;Our list of distributions is a guide for what to install in a
+computer.  Therefore, it only includes distributions that are complete
+in themselves and ready to use.  If a distribution is incomplete
+&mdash; if using it requires further work or presupposes installing
+other software as well &mdash; then it doesn't belong in this list,
+even if it is free software.&lt;/p&gt;
+
+&lt;h3 id="license-rules"&gt;License Rules&lt;/h3&gt;
+
+&lt;p&gt;&ldquo;Information for practical use&rdquo;
+includes software, documentation, fonts, and other data that has
+direct functional applications.  It does not include artistic works
+that have an aesthetic (rather than functional) purpose, or statements
+of opinion or judgment.&lt;/p&gt;
+
+&lt;p&gt;All information for practical use in a free distribution must be
+available in source form.  (&ldquo;Source&rdquo; means the form of the
+information that is preferred for making changes to it.)&lt;/p&gt;
+
+&lt;p&gt;The information, and the source, must be provided under an
+appropriate free license.  We list the ones we have evaluated
+on &lt;a class="reference" href="/licenses/license-list.html"&gt;our license
+list&lt;/a&gt;, with separate sections for licenses that are suitable for
+software, documentation, fonts, and other useful works.  If such a
+work is released under multiple licenses, at least one of which is
+free, it can be included in the system; the system developers just
+need to follow the terms of the available free license(s) when they
+distribute and/or modify it.&lt;/p&gt;
+
+&lt;p&gt;A free system distribution must not steer users towards obtaining
+any nonfree information for practical use, or encourage them to do so.
+The system should have no repositories for nonfree software and no
+specific recipes for installation of particular nonfree programs. Nor
+should the distribution refer to third-party repositories that are not
+committed to only including free software; even if they only have free
+software today, that may not be true tomorrow.  Programs in the system
+should not suggest installing nonfree plugins, documentation, and so
+on.&lt;/p&gt;
+
+&lt;p&gt;A free system distribution should be self-hosting.  This means that
+you must be able to develop and build the system with tools that the
+system provides you.  As a result, a free system distribution cannot
+include free software that can only be built by using nonfree
+software.&lt;/p&gt;
+
+&lt;p&gt;There's a lot of code in most free system distributions today; the
+amount of effort it would take to audit it all directly is impractical
+for most teams.  In the past, some nonfree code has accidentally been
+included in free system distributions.  We don't de-list distributions
+because of this; instead, we only ask that a distribution put forth a
+good faith effort to avoid including nonfree software, and commit
+itself to removing such programs if they are discovered later.&lt;/p&gt;
+
+&lt;p&gt;Certain kinds of license situations merit special attention for people
+creating or considering free software distributions; those are
+discussed in the sections below.&lt;/p&gt;
+
+&lt;h3 id="nonfree-firmware"&gt;Nonfree Firmware&lt;/h3&gt;
+
+&lt;p&gt;Some applications and drivers require firmware to function, and
+sometimes that firmware is distributed only in object code form, under
+a nonfree license.  We call these firmware programs
+&ldquo;blobs.&rdquo; On most GNU/Linux systems, you'll typically find
+these accompanying some drivers in the kernel Linux.  Such firmware
+should be removed from a free system distribution.&lt;/p&gt;
+
+&lt;p&gt;Blobs can take many forms.  Sometimes, they will be provided in
+separate files.  Other times, they may be incorporated into the source
+of the driver itself&mdash;for example, it could be encoded as a large
+array of numbers.  But no matter how it's encoded, any nonfree
+firmware needs to be removed from a free system.&lt;/p&gt;
+
+&lt;p&gt;(To be clear, not every array of numbers in a driver is firmware.
+It's important to understand the purpose of the data before deciding
+whether or not it's appropriate for a free system.)&lt;/p&gt;
+
+&lt;p&gt;Brian Brazil, Jeff Moe, and Alexandre Oliva have developed a series
+of &lt;a class="reference"
+href="http://www.fsfla.org/svn/fsfla/software/linux-libre/scripts/"&gt;scripts
+to remove nonfree firmware&lt;/a&gt; from a stock version of the Linux kernel.
+You may find them helpful if you would like to develop your own free
+GNU/Linux distribution&mdash;although we recommend joining development
+of an existing free distro rather than fragmenting effort by starting a
+new one.  The complete source for a blob-free version of the Linux
+kernel is also available; you can learn more about this project from the
+&lt;a class="reference" href="http://directory.fsf.org/project/linux/"&gt;Free
+Software Directory&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
+
+&lt;h3 id="non-functional-data"&gt;Non-functional Data&lt;/h3&gt;
+
+&lt;p&gt;Data that isn't functional, that doesn't do a practical job, is
+more of an adornment to the system's software than a part of it.
+Thus, we don't insist on the free license criteria for non-functional
+data.  It can be included in a free system distribution as long as its
+license gives you permission to copy and redistribute, both for
+commercial and non-commercial purposes.  For example, some game
+engines released under the GNU GPL have accompanying game
+information&mdash;a fictional world map, game graphics, and so
+on&mdash;released under such a verbatim-distribution license.  This
+kind of data can be part of a free system distribution, even though
+its license does not qualify as free, because it is non-functional.&lt;/p&gt;
+
+&lt;h3 id="trademarks"&gt;Trademarks&lt;/h3&gt;
+
+&lt;p&gt;Trademarks are associated with some software.  For example, the
+name of a program may be trademarked, or its interface may display a
+trademarked logo.  Often, the use of these marks will be controlled
+in some way; in particular, developers are commonly asked to remove
+references to the trademark from the software when they modify
+it.&lt;/p&gt;
+
+&lt;p&gt;In extreme cases, these restrictions may effectively render the
+program nonfree.  It is unfair for someone to ask you to remove a
+trademark from modified code if that trademark is scattered all
+throughout the original source.  As long as the practical
+requirements are reasonable, however, free system distributions may
+include these programs, either with or without the trademarks.&lt;/p&gt;
+
+&lt;p&gt;Similarly, the distribution itself may hold particular trademarks.
+It is not a problem if modification requires removal of these
+trademarks, as long as they can readily be removed without losing
+functionality.&lt;/p&gt;
+
+&lt;p&gt;However, it is unacceptable to use trademarks to restrict verbatim
+copying and redistribution of the whole distribution, or any part.&lt;/p&gt;
+
+&lt;h3 id="documentation"&gt;Documentation&lt;/h3&gt;
+
+&lt;p&gt;All the documentation in a free system distribution must be released
+under an appropriate free license.  Additionally, it must take care
+not to recommend nonfree software.&lt;/p&gt;
+
+&lt;p&gt;In general, something that helps people who already use nonfree
+software to use the free software better with it is acceptable, but
+something that encourages users of the free software to install
+nonfree software is not.&lt;/p&gt;
+
+&lt;p&gt;For example, a free system distribution may have documentation for
+users setting up dual boot systems.  It could explain how to access
+filesystems of the proprietary operating system, import settings
+from it, and so on.  That would be helping people install a free
+system distribution on a machine which already has proprietary
+software, which is good.&lt;/p&gt;
+
+&lt;p&gt;What would be unacceptable is for the documentation to give people
+instructions for installing a nonfree program on the system, or
+mention conveniences they might gain by doing so.&lt;/p&gt;
+
+&lt;p&gt;For a borderline case, a clear and serious exhortation not to use the
+nonfree program would move it to the acceptable side of the line.&lt;/p&gt;
+
+&lt;h3 id="patents"&gt;Patents&lt;/h3&gt;
+
+&lt;p&gt;It is effectively impossible for free software developers and
+distributors to know whether or not a given piece of software
+infringes any patents: there are too many of them, they vary from
+country to country, they're often worded so as to make it hard to tell
+what they do or don't cover, and it isn't easy to tell which ones are
+valid.  Therefore, we don't generally ask free system distributions to
+exclude software because of possible threats from patents.  On the
+other hand, we also don't object if a distributor chooses to omit some
+software in order to avoid patent risk.&lt;/p&gt;
+
+&lt;h3 <span class="inserted"><ins><em>id="no-malware"&gt;No Malware&lt;/h3&gt;
+
+&lt;p&gt;The distro must contain no DRM, no back doors, and no 
spyware.&lt;/p&gt;
+
+&lt;h3</em></ins></span> id="mistakes"&gt;Commitment to Correct 
Mistakes&lt;/h3&gt;
+
+&lt;p&gt;Most distribution development teams don't have the resources to
+exhaustively check that their distribution meet all these criteria.
+Neither do we.  So we expect <span 
class="removed"><del><strong>developers</strong></del></span> <span 
class="inserted"><ins><em>distros</em></ins></span> to occasionally <span 
class="removed"><del><strong>make mistakes
+that let some</strong></del></span> <span class="inserted"><ins><em>contain 
mistakes:</em></ins></span>
+nonfree software <span class="removed"><del><strong>slip</strong></del></span> 
<span class="inserted"><ins><em>that slipped</em></ins></span> through, <span 
class="removed"><del><strong>and we</strong></del></span> <span 
class="inserted"><ins><em>etc.  We</em></ins></span> don't reject a
+distribution <span class="removed"><del><strong>just for 
that.</strong></del></span> <span class="inserted"><ins><em>over 
mistakes.</em></ins></span>  Our requirement is for the distribution
+developers to have a firm commitment to promptly correct any mistakes
+that are reported to them.&lt;/p&gt;
+
+&lt;h3 id="maintenance"&gt;Maintenance&lt;/h3&gt;
+
+&lt;p&gt;To be listed, a distribution should be actively maintained,
+and should give the GNU Project a clear and specific way to report problems
+of nonfree software that we find out about.  It should also
+inform us when the problems we have reported are fixed.&lt;/p&gt;
+
+&lt;h3 id="name-confusion"&gt;Name Confusion&lt;/h3&gt;
+
+&lt;p&gt;We will not list a distribution whose name makes confusion with
+nonfree distributions likely.  For example, if Foobar Light is a free
+distribution and Foobar is a nonfree distribution, we will not list
+Foobar Light.  This is because we expect that the distinction between
+the two would be lost in the process of communicating the message.&lt;/p&gt;
+
+&lt;h3 id="upstream"&gt;Contacting Upstream If You're Downstream&lt;/h3&gt;
+
+&lt;p&gt;For distro developers (or anyone else) who have sent an important bug
+report for a GNU package: if it has gone unheeded by the package
+maintainer after a reasonable time (please allow at least two weeks),
+you can escalate the bug by writing to &lt;address@hidden&gt;.
+This is especially warranted if you can't find evidence of recent
+activity by the package maintainer.&lt;/p&gt;
+
+&lt;h3 id="teaching"&gt;Please Teach Users about Free Software&lt;/h3&gt;
+
+&lt;p&gt;To establish lasting freedom, just giving users freedom isn't
+sufficient.  It is necessary also to teach them to understand what it
+means and to demand it.  Thus, we suggest and urge that free distros
+announce prominently on the screen, before login and on the default
+desktop after login, a prominent statement about freedom, such as
+&ldquo;This system is freedom-respecting free/libre software&rdquo; or
+something comparable, and to present a link or icon pointing at
+gnu.org or gnu.org/philosophy for further information about the
+issue.&lt;/p&gt;
+
+&lt;h3 id="final-notes"&gt;Final Notes&lt;/h3&gt;
+
+&lt;p&gt;We maintain a list of the &lt;a 
href="/distros/free-distros.html"&gt;free
+system distributions&lt;/a&gt; we know about.  If you know about a free
+distribution that isn't listed there, please ask its developers write
+to &lt;&lt;a class="reference"
+href="mailto:address@hidden"&gt;address@hidden&lt;/a&gt;&gt; with a 
description of
+their system and a link to their web page.&lt;/p&gt;
+
+&lt;p&gt;Our list consists of systems based on GNU which acknowledge that
+they are based on GNU.  At present, we know of no other systems
+that would qualify.  If someday there is one, we will list it,
+but not necessarily in same way.&lt;/p&gt;
+
+&lt;p&gt;If you have questions or comments about these guidelines
+themselves, feel free to send those to &lt;&lt;a class="reference"
+href="mailto:address@hidden"&gt;address@hidden&lt;/a&gt;&gt;.  We hope
+that they help everyone better understand the issues that are important
+for free system distributions, and we look forward to promoting more
+of them in the future.&lt;/p&gt;
+
+&lt;/div&gt;&lt;!-- for id="content", starts in the include above --&gt;
+&lt;!--#include virtual="/server/footer.html" --&gt;
+&lt;div id="footer"&gt;
+
+&lt;p&gt;Please send general FSF &amp; GNU inquiries to
+&lt;a href="mailto:address@hidden"&gt;&lt;address@hidden&gt;&lt;/a&gt;.
+There are also &lt;a href="/contact/"&gt;other ways to contact&lt;/a&gt;
+the FSF.  Broken links and other corrections or suggestions can be sent
+to &lt;a 
href="mailto:address@hidden"&gt;&lt;address@hidden&gt;&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
+
+&lt;p&gt;&lt;!-- TRANSLATORS: Ignore the original text in this paragraph,
+        replace it with the translation of these two:
+
+        We work hard and do our best to provide accurate, good quality
+        translations.  However, we are not exempt from imperfection.
+        Please send your comments and general suggestions in this regard
+        to &lt;a href="mailto:address@hidden"&gt;
+        &lt;address@hidden&gt;&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
+
+        &lt;p&gt;For information on coordinating and submitting translations of
+        our web pages, see &lt;a
+        href="/server/standards/README.translations.html"&gt;Translations
+        README&lt;/a&gt;. --&gt;
+Please see the &lt;a
+href="/server/standards/README.translations.html"&gt;Translations
+README&lt;/a&gt; for information on coordinating and submitting translations
+of this article.&lt;/p&gt;
+
+&lt;!-- Regarding copyright, in general, standalone pages (as opposed to
+     files generated as part of manuals) on the GNU web server should
+     be under CC BY-ND 3.0 US.  Please do NOT change or remove this
+     without talking with the webmasters or licensing team first.
+     Please make sure the copyright date is consistent with the
+     document.  For web pages, it is ok to list just the latest year the
+     document was modified, or published.
+     
+     If you wish to list earlier years, that is ok too.
+     Either "2001, 2002, 2003" or "2001-2003" are ok for specifying
+     years, as long as each year in the range is in fact a copyrightable
+     year, i.e., a year in which the document was published (including
+     being publicly visible on the web or in a revision control system).
+     
+     There is more detail about copyright years in the GNU Maintainers
+     Information document, www.gnu.org/prep/maintain. --&gt;
+
+&lt;p&gt;Copyright &copy; 2010 Free Software Foundation, Inc.&lt;/p&gt;
+
+&lt;p&gt;This page is licensed under a &lt;a rel="license"
+href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/3.0/us/"&gt;Creative
+Commons Attribution-NoDerivs 3.0 United States License&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
+
+&lt;!--#include virtual="/server/bottom-notes.html" --&gt;
+
+&lt;p&gt;Updated:
+&lt;!-- timestamp start --&gt;
+$Date: 2014/01/31 13:00:51 $
+&lt;!-- timestamp end --&gt;
+&lt;/p&gt;
+&lt;/div&gt;
+&lt;/div&gt;
+&lt;/body&gt;
+&lt;/html&gt;
+</pre></body></html>



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]