www/licenses/po gpl-faq.es.po gpl-faq.fr.po gpl...

www-commits
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
www/licenses/po gpl-faq.es.po gpl-faq.fr.po gpl...

From:	GNUN
Subject:	www/licenses/po gpl-faq.es.po gpl-faq.fr.po gpl...
Date:	Sat, 25 Jan 2014 14:59:06 +0000
CVSROOT:        /web/www
Module name:    www
Changes by:     GNUN <gnun>     14/01/25 14:59:06

Modified files:
        licenses/po    : gpl-faq.es.po gpl-faq.fr.po gpl-faq.ja.po 
                         gpl-faq.pot gpl-faq.ru.po gpl-faq.ta.po 

Log message:
        Automatic update by GNUnited Nations.

CVSWeb URLs:
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/licenses/po/gpl-faq.es.po?cvsroot=www&r1=1.23&r2=1.24
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/licenses/po/gpl-faq.fr.po?cvsroot=www&r1=1.111&r2=1.112
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/licenses/po/gpl-faq.ja.po?cvsroot=www&r1=1.24&r2=1.25
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/licenses/po/gpl-faq.pot?cvsroot=www&r1=1.47&r2=1.48
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/licenses/po/gpl-faq.ru.po?cvsroot=www&r1=1.57&r2=1.58
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/licenses/po/gpl-faq.ta.po?cvsroot=www&r1=1.33&r2=1.34

Patches:
Index: gpl-faq.es.po
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/licenses/po/gpl-faq.es.po,v
retrieving revision 1.23
retrieving revision 1.24
diff -u -b -r1.23 -r1.24
--- gpl-faq.es.po       23 Dec 2013 23:34:42 -0000      1.23
+++ gpl-faq.es.po       25 Jan 2014 14:59:03 -0000      1.24
@@ -7,7 +7,7 @@
 msgid ""
 msgstr ""
 "Project-Id-Version: gpl-faq.html\n"
-"POT-Creation-Date: 2013-12-16 21:55+0000\n"
+"POT-Creation-Date: 2014-01-25 14:55+0000\n"
 "PO-Revision-Date: 2013-12-17 21:55+0100\n"
 "Last-Translator: Dora Scilipoti <dora AT gnu DOT org>\n"
 "Language-Team: Spanish <address@hidden>\n"
@@ -15,6 +15,7 @@
 "MIME-Version: 1.0\n"
 "Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8\n"
 "Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit\n"
+"Outdated-Since: 2014-01-25 14:55+0000\n"
 "Plural-Forms: nplurals=2; plural=(n!=1);\n"
 "X-Poedit-Language: Spanish\n"
 
@@ -288,6 +289,21 @@
 "de mis modificaciones de un programa cubierto por la GPL?</a>"
 
 #. type: Content of: <ul><li>
+# | <a [-href=\"#GPLTranslations\">Are there translations of-]
+# | {+href=\"#TranslateCode\">What does+} the GPL [-into other
+# | languages?</a>-] {+say about translating some code to a different
+# | programming language?</a>+}
+#, fuzzy
+#| msgid ""
+#| "<a href=\"#GPLTranslations\">Are there translations of the GPL into other "
+#| "languages?</a>"
+msgid ""
+"<a href=\"#TranslateCode\">What does the GPL say about translating some code "
+"to a different programming language?</a>"
+msgstr ""
+"<a href=\"#GPLTranslations\">Â¿Hay traducciones de la GPL a otras 
lenguas?</a>"
+
+#. type: Content of: <ul><li>
 msgid ""
 "<a href=\"#CombinePublicDomainWithGPL\">If a program combines public-domain "
 "code with GPL-covered code, can I take the public-domain part and use it as "
@@ -542,6 +558,18 @@
 
 #. type: Content of: <ul><li>
 msgid ""
+"<a href=\"#LicenseCopyOnly\">Is putting a copy of the GNU GPL in my "
+"repository enough to apply the GPL?</a>"
+msgstr ""
+
+#. type: Content of: <ul><li>
+msgid ""
+"<a href=\"#NoticeInSourceFile\">Why should I put a license notice in each "
+"source file?</a>"
+msgstr ""
+
+#. type: Content of: <ul><li>
+msgid ""
 "<a href=\"#HowIGetCopyright\">How do I get a copyright on my program in "
 "order to release it under the GPL?</a>"
 msgstr ""
@@ -1786,6 +1814,32 @@
 "a>)."
 
 #. type: Content of: <dl><dt>
+# | [-Are there translations of-]{+What does+} the GPL [-into other
+# | languages?-] {+say about translating some code to a different programming
+# | language?+} <span class=\"anchor-reference-id\">(<a
+# | [-href=\"#GPLTranslations\" >#GPLTranslations</a>)</span>-]
+# | {+href=\"#TranslateCode\" >#TranslateCode</a>)</span>+}
+#, fuzzy
+#| msgid ""
+#| "Are there translations of the GPL into other languages? <span class="
+#| "\"anchor-reference-id\">(<a href=\"#GPLTranslations\" >#GPLTranslations</"
+#| "a>)</span>"
+msgid ""
+"What does the GPL say about translating some code to a different programming "
+"language? <span class=\"anchor-reference-id\">(<a href=\"#TranslateCode\" "
+">#TranslateCode</a>)</span>"
+msgstr ""
+"Â¿Hay traducciones de la GPL a otras lenguas? <span class=\"anchor-reference-"
+"id\">(<a href=\"#GPLTranslations\" >#GPLTranslations</a>)</span>"
+
+#. type: Content of: <dl><dd><p>
+msgid ""
+"Under copyright law, translation of a work is considered a kind of "
+"modification.  Therefore, what the GPL says about modified versions applies "
+"also to translated versions."
+msgstr ""
+
+#. type: Content of: <dl><dt>
 msgid ""
 "If a program combines public-domain code with GPL-covered code, can I take "
 "the public-domain part and use it as public domain code? <span class="
@@ -2083,6 +2137,86 @@
 "ver la licencia consiste en incluir una copia de la licencia en el programa."
 
 #. type: Content of: <dl><dt>
+# | [-Are there translations-]{+Is it enough just to put a copy+} of the
+# | {+GNU+} GPL [-into other languages?-] {+in my repository?+} <span
+# | class=\"anchor-reference-id\">(<a [-href=\"#GPLTranslations\"
+# | >#GPLTranslations</a>)</span>-] {+href=\"#LicenseCopyOnly\"
+# | >#LicenseCopyOnly</a>)</span>+}
+#, fuzzy
+#| msgid ""
+#| "Are there translations of the GPL into other languages? <span class="
+#| "\"anchor-reference-id\">(<a href=\"#GPLTranslations\" >#GPLTranslations</"
+#| "a>)</span>"
+msgid ""
+"Is it enough just to put a copy of the GNU GPL in my repository? <span class="
+"\"anchor-reference-id\">(<a href=\"#LicenseCopyOnly\" >#LicenseCopyOnly</a>)"
+"</span>"
+msgstr ""
+"Â¿Hay traducciones de la GPL a otras lenguas? <span class=\"anchor-reference-"
+"id\">(<a href=\"#GPLTranslations\" >#GPLTranslations</a>)</span>"
+
+#. type: Content of: <dl><dd><p>
+msgid ""
+"Just putting a copy of the GNU GPL in a file in your repository does not "
+"explicitly state that the code in the same repository may be used under the "
+"GNU GPL.  Without such a statement, it's not entirely clear that the "
+"permissions in the license really apply to any particular source file.  An "
+"explicit statement saying that eliminates all doubt."
+msgstr ""
+
+#. type: Content of: <dl><dd><p>
+msgid ""
+"A file containing just a license, without a statement that certain other "
+"files are covered by that license, resembles a file containing just a "
+"subroutine which is never called from anywhere else.  The resemblance is not "
+"perfect: lawyers and courts might apply common sense and conclude that you "
+"must have put the copy of the GNU GPL there because you wanted to license "
+"the code that way.  But why leave any uncertainty?"
+msgstr ""
+
+#. type: Content of: <dl><dd><p>
+msgid ""
+"This has nothing to do with the specifics of the GNU GPL.  It is true for "
+"any free license."
+msgstr ""
+
+#. type: Content of: <dl><dt>
+# | Why [-is the original BSD-] {+should I put a+} license [-incompatible with
+# | the GPL?-] {+notice in each source file?+} <span
+# | class=\"anchor-reference-id\">(<a [-href=\"#OrigBSD\"
+# | >#OrigBSD</a>)</span>-] {+href=\"#NoticeInSourceFile\"
+# | >#NoticeInSourceFile</a>)</span>+}
+#, fuzzy
+#| msgid ""
+#| "Why is the original BSD license incompatible with the GPL? <span class="
+#| "\"anchor-reference-id\">(<a href=\"#OrigBSD\" >#OrigBSD</a>)</span>"
+msgid ""
+"Why should I put a license notice in each source file? <span class=\"anchor-"
+"reference-id\">(<a href=\"#NoticeInSourceFile\" >#NoticeInSourceFile</a>)</"
+"span>"
+msgstr ""
+"Â¿Por quÃ© la licencia BSD original es incompatible con la GPL? <span class="
+"\"anchor-reference-id\">(<a href=\"#OrigBSD\" >#OrigBSD</a>)</span>"
+
+#. type: Content of: <dl><dd><p>
+msgid ""
+"You should put a notice at the start of each source file, stating what "
+"license it carries, in order to avoid risk of the code's getting "
+"disconnected from its license.  If your repository's README says that source "
+"file is under the GNU GPL, what happens if someone copies that file to "
+"another program? That other context may not show what the file's license "
+"is.  It may appear to have some other license, or <a href=\"/licenses/"
+"license-list.html#NoLicense\">no license at all</a> (which would make the "
+"code nonfree)."
+msgstr ""
+
+#. type: Content of: <dl><dd><p>
+msgid ""
+"Adding a copyright notice and a license notice at the start of each source "
+"file is easy and makes such confusion unlikely."
+msgstr ""
+
+#. type: Content of: <dl><dt>
 msgid ""
 "What if the work is not very long? <span class=\"anchor-reference-id\">(<a "
 "href=\"#WhatIfWorkIsShort\" >#WhatIfWorkIsShort</a>)</span>"
@@ -2091,12 +2225,26 @@
 "href=\"#WhatIfWorkIsShort\" >#WhatIfWorkIsShort</a>)</span>"
 
 #. type: Content of: <dl><dd><p>
+# | If a whole software package contains very little code&mdash;less than 300
+# | lines is the benchmark we use&mdash;you may as well use a [-simple-] lax
+# | {+permissive+} license for it, rather than a copyleft license like the GNU
+# | GPL.  {+(Unless, that is, the code is specially important.)+}  We <a
+# | href=\"/licenses/license-recommendations.html#software\">recommend the
+# | Apache License 2.0</a> for such cases.
+#, fuzzy
+#| msgid ""
+#| "If a whole software package contains very little code&mdash;less than 300 "
+#| "lines is the benchmark we use&mdash;you may as well use a simple lax "
+#| "license for it, rather than a copyleft license like the GNU GPL.  We <a "
+#| "href=\"/licenses/license-recommendations.html#software\">recommend the "
+#| "Apache License 2.0</a> for such cases."
 msgid ""
 "If a whole software package contains very little code&mdash;less than 300 "
-"lines is the benchmark we use&mdash;you may as well use a simple lax license "
-"for it, rather than a copyleft license like the GNU GPL.  We <a href=\"/"
-"licenses/license-recommendations.html#software\">recommend the Apache "
-"License 2.0</a> for such cases."
+"lines is the benchmark we use&mdash;you may as well use a lax permissive "
+"license for it, rather than a copyleft license like the GNU GPL.  (Unless, "
+"that is, the code is specially important.)  We <a href=\"/licenses/license-"
+"recommendations.html#software\">recommend the Apache License 2.0</a> for "
+"such cases."
 msgstr ""
 "Si el paquete de software en conjunto contiene poco cÃ³digo &mdash;tomamos un 
"
 "lÃmite de 300 lÃneas como referencia&mdash; puede utilizar un licencia "

Index: gpl-faq.fr.po
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/licenses/po/gpl-faq.fr.po,v
retrieving revision 1.111
retrieving revision 1.112
diff -u -b -r1.111 -r1.112
--- gpl-faq.fr.po       17 Dec 2013 10:50:05 -0000      1.111
+++ gpl-faq.fr.po       25 Jan 2014 14:59:03 -0000      1.112
@@ -9,7 +9,7 @@
 msgid ""
 msgstr ""
 "Project-Id-Version: gpl-faq.html\n"
-"POT-Creation-Date: 2013-12-16 21:55+0000\n"
+"POT-Creation-Date: 2014-01-25 14:55+0000\n"
 "PO-Revision-Date: 2013-12-17 11:48+0100\n"
 "Last-Translator: ThÃ©rÃ¨se Godefroy <godef.th AT free.fr>\n"
 "Language-Team: French <address@hidden>\n"
@@ -17,6 +17,7 @@
 "MIME-Version: 1.0\n"
 "Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8\n"
 "Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit\n"
+"Outdated-Since: 2014-01-25 14:55+0000\n"
 "Plural-Forms: \n"
 "X-Generator: Gtranslator 2.91.5\n"
 
@@ -292,6 +293,22 @@
 "GPLÂ ?</a>"
 
 #. type: Content of: <ul><li>
+# | <a [-href=\"#GPLTranslations\">Are there translations of-]
+# | {+href=\"#TranslateCode\">What does+} the GPL [-into other
+# | languages?</a>-] {+say about translating some code to a different
+# | programming language?</a>+}
+#, fuzzy
+#| msgid ""
+#| "<a href=\"#GPLTranslations\">Are there translations of the GPL into other "
+#| "languages?</a>"
+msgid ""
+"<a href=\"#TranslateCode\">What does the GPL say about translating some code "
+"to a different programming language?</a>"
+msgstr ""
+"<a href=\"#GPLTranslations\">Existe-t-il des traductions de la GPL en "
+"d'autres languesÂ ?</a>"
+
+#. type: Content of: <ul><li>
 msgid ""
 "<a href=\"#CombinePublicDomainWithGPL\">If a program combines public-domain "
 "code with GPL-covered code, can I take the public-domain part and use it as "
@@ -546,6 +563,18 @@
 
 #. type: Content of: <ul><li>
 msgid ""
+"<a href=\"#LicenseCopyOnly\">Is putting a copy of the GNU GPL in my "
+"repository enough to apply the GPL?</a>"
+msgstr ""
+
+#. type: Content of: <ul><li>
+msgid ""
+"<a href=\"#NoticeInSourceFile\">Why should I put a license notice in each "
+"source file?</a>"
+msgstr ""
+
+#. type: Content of: <ul><li>
+msgid ""
 "<a href=\"#HowIGetCopyright\">How do I get a copyright on my program in "
 "order to release it under the GPL?</a>"
 msgstr ""
@@ -1794,6 +1823,33 @@
 "\"#GPLRequireSourcePostedPublic\">si vous la publiez</a>)."
 
 #. type: Content of: <dl><dt>
+# | [-Are there translations of-]{+What does+} the GPL [-into other
+# | languages?-] {+say about translating some code to a different programming
+# | language?+} <span class=\"anchor-reference-id\">(<a
+# | [-href=\"#GPLTranslations\" >#GPLTranslations</a>)</span>-]
+# | {+href=\"#TranslateCode\" >#TranslateCode</a>)</span>+}
+#, fuzzy
+#| msgid ""
+#| "Are there translations of the GPL into other languages? <span class="
+#| "\"anchor-reference-id\">(<a href=\"#GPLTranslations\" >#GPLTranslations</"
+#| "a>)</span>"
+msgid ""
+"What does the GPL say about translating some code to a different programming "
+"language? <span class=\"anchor-reference-id\">(<a href=\"#TranslateCode\" "
+">#TranslateCode</a>)</span>"
+msgstr ""
+"Existe-t-il des traductions de la GPL en d'autres languesÂ ? <span class="
+"\"anchor-reference-id\">(<a href=\"#GPLTranslations\" >#GPLTranslations</a>)"
+"</span>"
+
+#. type: Content of: <dl><dd><p>
+msgid ""
+"Under copyright law, translation of a work is considered a kind of "
+"modification.  Therefore, what the GPL says about modified versions applies "
+"also to translated versions."
+msgstr ""
+
+#. type: Content of: <dl><dt>
 msgid ""
 "If a program combines public-domain code with GPL-covered code, can I take "
 "the public-domain part and use it as public domain code? <span class="
@@ -2096,6 +2152,87 @@
 "programme."
 
 #. type: Content of: <dl><dt>
+# | [-Are there translations-]{+Is it enough just to put a copy+} of the
+# | {+GNU+} GPL [-into other languages?-] {+in my repository?+} <span
+# | class=\"anchor-reference-id\">(<a [-href=\"#GPLTranslations\"
+# | >#GPLTranslations</a>)</span>-] {+href=\"#LicenseCopyOnly\"
+# | >#LicenseCopyOnly</a>)</span>+}
+#, fuzzy
+#| msgid ""
+#| "Are there translations of the GPL into other languages? <span class="
+#| "\"anchor-reference-id\">(<a href=\"#GPLTranslations\" >#GPLTranslations</"
+#| "a>)</span>"
+msgid ""
+"Is it enough just to put a copy of the GNU GPL in my repository? <span class="
+"\"anchor-reference-id\">(<a href=\"#LicenseCopyOnly\" >#LicenseCopyOnly</a>)"
+"</span>"
+msgstr ""
+"Existe-t-il des traductions de la GPL en d'autres languesÂ ? <span class="
+"\"anchor-reference-id\">(<a href=\"#GPLTranslations\" >#GPLTranslations</a>)"
+"</span>"
+
+#. type: Content of: <dl><dd><p>
+msgid ""
+"Just putting a copy of the GNU GPL in a file in your repository does not "
+"explicitly state that the code in the same repository may be used under the "
+"GNU GPL.  Without such a statement, it's not entirely clear that the "
+"permissions in the license really apply to any particular source file.  An "
+"explicit statement saying that eliminates all doubt."
+msgstr ""
+
+#. type: Content of: <dl><dd><p>
+msgid ""
+"A file containing just a license, without a statement that certain other "
+"files are covered by that license, resembles a file containing just a "
+"subroutine which is never called from anywhere else.  The resemblance is not "
+"perfect: lawyers and courts might apply common sense and conclude that you "
+"must have put the copy of the GNU GPL there because you wanted to license "
+"the code that way.  But why leave any uncertainty?"
+msgstr ""
+
+#. type: Content of: <dl><dd><p>
+msgid ""
+"This has nothing to do with the specifics of the GNU GPL.  It is true for "
+"any free license."
+msgstr ""
+
+#. type: Content of: <dl><dt>
+# | Why [-is the original BSD-] {+should I put a+} license [-incompatible with
+# | the GPL?-] {+notice in each source file?+} <span
+# | class=\"anchor-reference-id\">(<a [-href=\"#OrigBSD\"
+# | >#OrigBSD</a>)</span>-] {+href=\"#NoticeInSourceFile\"
+# | >#NoticeInSourceFile</a>)</span>+}
+#, fuzzy
+#| msgid ""
+#| "Why is the original BSD license incompatible with the GPL? <span class="
+#| "\"anchor-reference-id\">(<a href=\"#OrigBSD\" >#OrigBSD</a>)</span>"
+msgid ""
+"Why should I put a license notice in each source file? <span class=\"anchor-"
+"reference-id\">(<a href=\"#NoticeInSourceFile\" >#NoticeInSourceFile</a>)</"
+"span>"
+msgstr ""
+"Pourquoi la licence BSD d'origine est-elle incompatible avec la GPLÂ ? <span "
+"class=\"anchor-reference-id\">(<a href=\"#OrigBSD\" >#OrigBSD</a>)</span>"
+
+#. type: Content of: <dl><dd><p>
+msgid ""
+"You should put a notice at the start of each source file, stating what "
+"license it carries, in order to avoid risk of the code's getting "
+"disconnected from its license.  If your repository's README says that source "
+"file is under the GNU GPL, what happens if someone copies that file to "
+"another program? That other context may not show what the file's license "
+"is.  It may appear to have some other license, or <a href=\"/licenses/"
+"license-list.html#NoLicense\">no license at all</a> (which would make the "
+"code nonfree)."
+msgstr ""
+
+#. type: Content of: <dl><dd><p>
+msgid ""
+"Adding a copyright notice and a license notice at the start of each source "
+"file is easy and makes such confusion unlikely."
+msgstr ""
+
+#. type: Content of: <dl><dt>
 msgid ""
 "What if the work is not very long? <span class=\"anchor-reference-id\">(<a "
 "href=\"#WhatIfWorkIsShort\" >#WhatIfWorkIsShort</a>)</span>"
@@ -2104,12 +2241,26 @@
 "\">(<a href=\"#WhatIfWorkIsShort\" >#WhatIfWorkIsShort</a>)</span>"
 
 #. type: Content of: <dl><dd><p>
+# | If a whole software package contains very little code&mdash;less than 300
+# | lines is the benchmark we use&mdash;you may as well use a [-simple-] lax
+# | {+permissive+} license for it, rather than a copyleft license like the GNU
+# | GPL.  {+(Unless, that is, the code is specially important.)+}  We <a
+# | href=\"/licenses/license-recommendations.html#software\">recommend the
+# | Apache License 2.0</a> for such cases.
+#, fuzzy
+#| msgid ""
+#| "If a whole software package contains very little code&mdash;less than 300 "
+#| "lines is the benchmark we use&mdash;you may as well use a simple lax "
+#| "license for it, rather than a copyleft license like the GNU GPL.  We <a "
+#| "href=\"/licenses/license-recommendations.html#software\">recommend the "
+#| "Apache License 2.0</a> for such cases."
 msgid ""
 "If a whole software package contains very little code&mdash;less than 300 "
-"lines is the benchmark we use&mdash;you may as well use a simple lax license "
-"for it, rather than a copyleft license like the GNU GPL.  We <a href=\"/"
-"licenses/license-recommendations.html#software\">recommend the Apache "
-"License 2.0</a> for such cases."
+"lines is the benchmark we use&mdash;you may as well use a lax permissive "
+"license for it, rather than a copyleft license like the GNU GPL.  (Unless, "
+"that is, the code is specially important.)  We <a href=\"/licenses/license-"
+"recommendations.html#software\">recommend the Apache License 2.0</a> for "
+"such cases."
 msgstr ""
 "Si un paquet logiciel complet contient trÃ¨s peu de code âÂ moins de "
 "300Â lignes selon notre critÃ¨reÂ â vous pouvez aussi bien le mettre sous 
une "

Index: gpl-faq.ja.po
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/licenses/po/gpl-faq.ja.po,v
retrieving revision 1.24
retrieving revision 1.25
diff -u -b -r1.24 -r1.25
--- gpl-faq.ja.po       24 Dec 2013 08:15:08 -0000      1.24
+++ gpl-faq.ja.po       25 Jan 2014 14:59:05 -0000      1.25
@@ -6,7 +6,7 @@
 msgid ""
 msgstr ""
 "Project-Id-Version: gpl-faq.html\n"
-"POT-Creation-Date: 2013-12-16 21:55+0000\n"
+"POT-Creation-Date: 2014-01-25 14:55+0000\n"
 "PO-Revision-Date: 2013-12-24 16:12+0900\n"
 "Last-Translator: NIIBE Yutaka <address@hidden>\n"
 "Language-Team: Japanese <address@hidden>\n"
@@ -14,6 +14,7 @@
 "MIME-Version: 1.0\n"
 "Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8\n"
 "Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit\n"
+"Outdated-Since: 2014-01-25 14:55+0000\n"
 
 #. type: Content of: <title>
 msgid ""
@@ -283,6 +284,17 @@
 "åãèªåãæ¹å¤ããç¹ã«é¢ãã¦èä½æ¨©ãä¸»å¼µããå¿
è¦ã¯ããã¾ãã?</a>"
 
 #. type: Content of: <ul><li>
+#, fuzzy
+#| msgid ""
+#| "<a href=\"#GPLTranslations\">Are there translations of the GPL into other "
+#| "languages?</a>"
+msgid ""
+"<a href=\"#TranslateCode\">What does the GPL say about translating some code "
+"to a different programming language?</a>"
+msgstr ""
+"<a 
href=\"#GPLTranslations\">GPLãä»ã®è¨èªã«ç¿»è¨³ãããã®ã¯ããã¾ãã?</a>"
+
+#. type: Content of: <ul><li>
 msgid ""
 "<a href=\"#CombinePublicDomainWithGPL\">If a program combines public-domain "
 "code with GPL-covered code, can I take the public-domain part and use it as "
@@ -527,6 +539,18 @@
 
 #. type: Content of: <ul><li>
 msgid ""
+"<a href=\"#LicenseCopyOnly\">Is putting a copy of the GNU GPL in my "
+"repository enough to apply the GPL?</a>"
+msgstr ""
+
+#. type: Content of: <ul><li>
+msgid ""
+"<a href=\"#NoticeInSourceFile\">Why should I put a license notice in each "
+"source file?</a>"
+msgstr ""
+
+#. type: Content of: <ul><li>
+msgid ""
 "<a href=\"#HowIGetCopyright\">How do I get a copyright on my program in "
 "order to release it under the GPL?</a>"
 msgstr ""
@@ -1740,6 +1764,27 @@
 "ãããªãã°</a>)"
 
 #. type: Content of: <dl><dt>
+#, fuzzy
+#| msgid ""
+#| "Are there translations of the GPL into other languages? <span class="
+#| "\"anchor-reference-id\">(<a href=\"#GPLTranslations\" >#GPLTranslations</"
+#| "a>)</span>"
+msgid ""
+"What does the GPL say about translating some code to a different programming "
+"language? <span class=\"anchor-reference-id\">(<a href=\"#TranslateCode\" "
+">#TranslateCode</a>)</span>"
+msgstr ""
+"GPLãä»ã®è¨èªã«ç¿»è¨³ãããã®ã¯ããã¾ãã? <span 
class=\"anchor-reference-id\">"
+"(<a href=\"#GPLTranslations\" >#GPLTranslations</a>)</span>"
+
+#. type: Content of: <dl><dd><p>
+msgid ""
+"Under copyright law, translation of a work is considered a kind of "
+"modification.  Therefore, what the GPL says about modified versions applies "
+"also to translated versions."
+msgstr ""
+
+#. type: Content of: <dl><dt>
 msgid ""
 "If a program combines public-domain code with GPL-covered code, can I take "
 "the public-domain part and use it as public domain code? <span class="
@@ -2036,6 +2081,76 @@
 "ã³ã¹ã®è¤è£½ãããã°ã©ã ã®ä¸ã«å«ãããã¨ã§ãã"
 
 #. type: Content of: <dl><dt>
+#, fuzzy
+#| msgid ""
+#| "Are there translations of the GPL into other languages? <span class="
+#| "\"anchor-reference-id\">(<a href=\"#GPLTranslations\" >#GPLTranslations</"
+#| "a>)</span>"
+msgid ""
+"Is it enough just to put a copy of the GNU GPL in my repository? <span class="
+"\"anchor-reference-id\">(<a href=\"#LicenseCopyOnly\" >#LicenseCopyOnly</a>)"
+"</span>"
+msgstr ""
+"GPLãä»ã®è¨èªã«ç¿»è¨³ãããã®ã¯ããã¾ãã? <span 
class=\"anchor-reference-id\">"
+"(<a href=\"#GPLTranslations\" >#GPLTranslations</a>)</span>"
+
+#. type: Content of: <dl><dd><p>
+msgid ""
+"Just putting a copy of the GNU GPL in a file in your repository does not "
+"explicitly state that the code in the same repository may be used under the "
+"GNU GPL.  Without such a statement, it's not entirely clear that the "
+"permissions in the license really apply to any particular source file.  An "
+"explicit statement saying that eliminates all doubt."
+msgstr ""
+
+#. type: Content of: <dl><dd><p>
+msgid ""
+"A file containing just a license, without a statement that certain other "
+"files are covered by that license, resembles a file containing just a "
+"subroutine which is never called from anywhere else.  The resemblance is not "
+"perfect: lawyers and courts might apply common sense and conclude that you "
+"must have put the copy of the GNU GPL there because you wanted to license "
+"the code that way.  But why leave any uncertainty?"
+msgstr ""
+
+#. type: Content of: <dl><dd><p>
+msgid ""
+"This has nothing to do with the specifics of the GNU GPL.  It is true for "
+"any free license."
+msgstr ""
+
+#. type: Content of: <dl><dt>
+#, fuzzy
+#| msgid ""
+#| "Why is the original BSD license incompatible with the GPL? <span class="
+#| "\"anchor-reference-id\">(<a href=\"#OrigBSD\" >#OrigBSD</a>)</span>"
+msgid ""
+"Why should I put a license notice in each source file? <span class=\"anchor-"
+"reference-id\">(<a href=\"#NoticeInSourceFile\" >#NoticeInSourceFile</a>)</"
+"span>"
+msgstr ""
+"ã©ããã¦ãªãªã¸ãã«ã®BSDã©ã¤ã»ã³ã¹ã¯GPLã¨ä¸¡ç«ããªãã®ã§ãã?
 <span class="
+"\"anchor-reference-id\">(<a href=\"#OrigBSD\" >#OrigBSD</a>)</span>"
+
+#. type: Content of: <dl><dd><p>
+msgid ""
+"You should put a notice at the start of each source file, stating what "
+"license it carries, in order to avoid risk of the code's getting "
+"disconnected from its license.  If your repository's README says that source "
+"file is under the GNU GPL, what happens if someone copies that file to "
+"another program? That other context may not show what the file's license "
+"is.  It may appear to have some other license, or <a href=\"/licenses/"
+"license-list.html#NoLicense\">no license at all</a> (which would make the "
+"code nonfree)."
+msgstr ""
+
+#. type: Content of: <dl><dd><p>
+msgid ""
+"Adding a copyright notice and a license notice at the start of each source "
+"file is easy and makes such confusion unlikely."
+msgstr ""
+
+#. type: Content of: <dl><dt>
 msgid ""
 "What if the work is not very long? <span class=\"anchor-reference-id\">(<a "
 "href=\"#WhatIfWorkIsShort\" >#WhatIfWorkIsShort</a>)</span>"
@@ -2045,12 +2160,20 @@
 ">#WhatIfWorkIsShort</a>)</span>"
 
 #. type: Content of: <dl><dd><p>
+#, fuzzy
+#| msgid ""
+#| "If a whole software package contains very little code&mdash;less than 300 "
+#| "lines is the benchmark we use&mdash;you may as well use a simple lax "
+#| "license for it, rather than a copyleft license like the GNU GPL.  We <a "
+#| "href=\"/licenses/license-recommendations.html#software\">recommend the "
+#| "Apache License 2.0</a> for such cases."
 msgid ""
 "If a whole software package contains very little code&mdash;less than 300 "
-"lines is the benchmark we use&mdash;you may as well use a simple lax license "
-"for it, rather than a copyleft license like the GNU GPL.  We <a href=\"/"
-"licenses/license-recommendations.html#software\">recommend the Apache "
-"License 2.0</a> for such cases."
+"lines is the benchmark we use&mdash;you may as well use a lax permissive "
+"license for it, rather than a copyleft license like the GNU GPL.  (Unless, "
+"that is, the code is specially important.)  We <a href=\"/licenses/license-"
+"recommendations.html#software\">recommend the Apache License 2.0</a> for "
+"such cases."
 msgstr ""
 "ããå
¨ä½ã®ã½ããã¦ã§ã¢ããã±ã¼ã¸ããããªã«å°ããã³ã¼ããããªã(300è¡ãããã"
 "ãã¡ã®ä½¿ãåºæºã§ã)çããªãã°ãGNU 
GPLã®ãããªã³ãã¼ã¬ããã®ã©ã¤ã»ã³ã¹ã§ã¯ãª"

Index: gpl-faq.pot
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/licenses/po/gpl-faq.pot,v
retrieving revision 1.47
retrieving revision 1.48
diff -u -b -r1.47 -r1.48
--- gpl-faq.pot 16 Dec 2013 21:56:09 -0000      1.47
+++ gpl-faq.pot 25 Jan 2014 14:59:05 -0000      1.48
@@ -7,7 +7,7 @@
 msgid ""
 msgstr ""
 "Project-Id-Version: gpl-faq.html\n"
-"POT-Creation-Date: 2013-12-16 21:55+0000\n"
+"POT-Creation-Date: 2014-01-25 14:55+0000\n"
 "PO-Revision-Date: YEAR-MO-DA HO:MI+ZONE\n"
 "Last-Translator: FULL NAME <address@hidden>\n"
 "Language-Team: LANGUAGE <address@hidden>\n"
@@ -223,6 +223,12 @@
 
 #. type: Content of: <ul><li>
 msgid ""
+"<a href=\"#TranslateCode\">What does the GPL say about translating some code "
+"to a different programming language?</a>"
+msgstr ""
+
+#. type: Content of: <ul><li>
+msgid ""
 "<a href=\"#CombinePublicDomainWithGPL\">If a program combines public-domain "
 "code with GPL-covered code, can I take the public-domain part and use it as "
 "public domain code?</a>"
@@ -405,6 +411,18 @@
 
 #. type: Content of: <ul><li>
 msgid ""
+"<a href=\"#LicenseCopyOnly\">Is putting a copy of the GNU GPL in my "
+"repository enough to apply the GPL?</a>"
+msgstr ""
+
+#. type: Content of: <ul><li>
+msgid ""
+"<a href=\"#NoticeInSourceFile\">Why should I put a license notice in each "
+"source file?</a>"
+msgstr ""
+
+#. type: Content of: <ul><li>
+msgid ""
 "<a href=\"#HowIGetCopyright\">How do I get a copyright on my program in "
 "order to release it under the GPL?</a>"
 msgstr ""
@@ -1268,6 +1286,20 @@
 
 #. type: Content of: <dl><dt>
 msgid ""
+"What does the GPL say about translating some code to a different programming "
+"language? <span class=\"anchor-reference-id\">(<a href=\"#TranslateCode\" "
+">#TranslateCode</a>)</span>"
+msgstr ""
+
+#. type: Content of: <dl><dd><p>
+msgid ""
+"Under copyright law, translation of a work is considered a kind of "
+"modification.  Therefore, what the GPL says about modified versions applies "
+"also to translated versions."
+msgstr ""
+
+#. type: Content of: <dl><dt>
+msgid ""
 "If a program combines public-domain code with GPL-covered code, can I take "
 "the public-domain part and use it as public domain code? <span "
 "class=\"anchor-reference-id\">(<a href=\"#CombinePublicDomainWithGPL\" "
@@ -1470,6 +1502,64 @@
 
 #. type: Content of: <dl><dt>
 msgid ""
+"Is it enough just to put a copy of the GNU GPL in my repository? <span "
+"class=\"anchor-reference-id\">(<a href=\"#LicenseCopyOnly\" "
+">#LicenseCopyOnly</a>)</span>"
+msgstr ""
+
+#. type: Content of: <dl><dd><p>
+msgid ""
+"Just putting a copy of the GNU GPL in a file in your repository does not "
+"explicitly state that the code in the same repository may be used under the "
+"GNU GPL.  Without such a statement, it's not entirely clear that the "
+"permissions in the license really apply to any particular source file.  An "
+"explicit statement saying that eliminates all doubt."
+msgstr ""
+
+#. type: Content of: <dl><dd><p>
+msgid ""
+"A file containing just a license, without a statement that certain other "
+"files are covered by that license, resembles a file containing just a "
+"subroutine which is never called from anywhere else.  The resemblance is not "
+"perfect: lawyers and courts might apply common sense and conclude that you "
+"must have put the copy of the GNU GPL there because you wanted to license "
+"the code that way.  But why leave any uncertainty?"
+msgstr ""
+
+#. type: Content of: <dl><dd><p>
+#:  
+msgid ""
+"This has nothing to do with the specifics of the GNU GPL.  It is true for "
+"any free license."
+msgstr ""
+
+#. type: Content of: <dl><dt>
+msgid ""
+"Why should I put a license notice in each source file? <span "
+"class=\"anchor-reference-id\">(<a href=\"#NoticeInSourceFile\" "
+">#NoticeInSourceFile</a>)</span>"
+msgstr ""
+
+#. type: Content of: <dl><dd><p>
+msgid ""
+"You should put a notice at the start of each source file, stating what "
+"license it carries, in order to avoid risk of the code's getting "
+"disconnected from its license.  If your repository's README says that source "
+"file is under the GNU GPL, what happens if someone copies that file to "
+"another program? That other context may not show what the file's license "
+"is.  It may appear to have some other license, or <a "
+"href=\"/licenses/license-list.html#NoLicense\">no license at all</a> (which "
+"would make the code nonfree)."
+msgstr ""
+
+#. type: Content of: <dl><dd><p>
+msgid ""
+"Adding a copyright notice and a license notice at the start of each source "
+"file is easy and makes such confusion unlikely."
+msgstr ""
+
+#. type: Content of: <dl><dt>
+msgid ""
 "What if the work is not very long? <span class=\"anchor-reference-id\">(<a "
 "href=\"#WhatIfWorkIsShort\" >#WhatIfWorkIsShort</a>)</span>"
 msgstr ""
@@ -1477,8 +1567,9 @@
 #. type: Content of: <dl><dd><p>
 msgid ""
 "If a whole software package contains very little code&mdash;less than 300 "
-"lines is the benchmark we use&mdash;you may as well use a simple lax license "
-"for it, rather than a copyleft license like the GNU GPL.  We <a "
+"lines is the benchmark we use&mdash;you may as well use a lax permissive "
+"license for it, rather than a copyleft license like the GNU GPL.  (Unless, "
+"that is, the code is specially important.)  We <a "
 "href=\"/licenses/license-recommendations.html#software\">recommend the "
 "Apache License 2.0</a> for such cases."
 msgstr ""

Index: gpl-faq.ru.po
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/licenses/po/gpl-faq.ru.po,v
retrieving revision 1.57
retrieving revision 1.58
diff -u -b -r1.57 -r1.58
--- gpl-faq.ru.po       17 Dec 2013 12:59:42 -0000      1.57
+++ gpl-faq.ru.po       25 Jan 2014 14:59:05 -0000      1.58
@@ -11,7 +11,7 @@
 msgid ""
 msgstr ""
 "Project-Id-Version: gpl-faq.html\n"
-"POT-Creation-Date: 2013-12-16 21:55+0000\n"
+"POT-Creation-Date: 2014-01-25 14:55+0000\n"
 "PO-Revision-Date: 2013-12-17 17:17+0000\n"
 "Last-Translator: Ineiev <address@hidden>\n"
 "Language-Team: Russian <address@hidden>\n"
@@ -19,6 +19,7 @@
 "MIME-Version: 1.0\n"
 "Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8\n"
 "Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit\n"
+"Outdated-Since: 2014-01-25 14:55+0000\n"
 
 #. type: Content of: <title>
 msgid ""
@@ -286,6 +287,21 @@
 "Ð°Ð²ÑÐ¾ÑÑÐºÐ¸Ñ Ð¿ÑÐ°Ð² Ð½Ð° Ð¼Ð¾Ð¸ Ð¸Ð·Ð¼ÐµÐ½ÐµÐ½Ð¸Ñ Ð² 
Ð¿ÑÐ¾Ð³ÑÐ°Ð¼Ð¼Ðµ Ð¿Ð¾Ð´ GPL?</a>"
 
 #. type: Content of: <ul><li>
+# | <a [-href=\"#GPLTranslations\">Are there translations of-]
+# | {+href=\"#TranslateCode\">What does+} the GPL [-into other
+# | languages?</a>-] {+say about translating some code to a different
+# | programming language?</a>+}
+#, fuzzy
+#| msgid ""
+#| "<a href=\"#GPLTranslations\">Are there translations of the GPL into other "
+#| "languages?</a>"
+msgid ""
+"<a href=\"#TranslateCode\">What does the GPL say about translating some code "
+"to a different programming language?</a>"
+msgstr ""
+"<a href=\"#GPLTranslations\">Ð¡ÑÑÐµÑÑÐ²ÑÑÑ Ð»Ð¸ Ð¿ÐµÑÐµÐ²Ð¾Ð´Ñ GPL 
Ð½Ð° Ð´ÑÑÐ³Ð¸Ðµ ÑÐ·ÑÐºÐ¸?</a>"
+
+#. type: Content of: <ul><li>
 msgid ""
 "<a href=\"#CombinePublicDomainWithGPL\">If a program combines public-domain "
 "code with GPL-covered code, can I take the public-domain part and use it as "
@@ -536,6 +552,18 @@
 
 #. type: Content of: <ul><li>
 msgid ""
+"<a href=\"#LicenseCopyOnly\">Is putting a copy of the GNU GPL in my "
+"repository enough to apply the GPL?</a>"
+msgstr ""
+
+#. type: Content of: <ul><li>
+msgid ""
+"<a href=\"#NoticeInSourceFile\">Why should I put a license notice in each "
+"source file?</a>"
+msgstr ""
+
+#. type: Content of: <ul><li>
+msgid ""
 "<a href=\"#HowIGetCopyright\">How do I get a copyright on my program in "
 "order to release it under the GPL?</a>"
 msgstr ""
@@ -1775,6 +1803,32 @@
 "Ð²ÐµÑÑÐ¸Ñ</a>)."
 
 #. type: Content of: <dl><dt>
+# | [-Are there translations of-]{+What does+} the GPL [-into other
+# | languages?-] {+say about translating some code to a different programming
+# | language?+} <span class=\"anchor-reference-id\">(<a
+# | [-href=\"#GPLTranslations\" >#GPLTranslations</a>)</span>-]
+# | {+href=\"#TranslateCode\" >#TranslateCode</a>)</span>+}
+#, fuzzy
+#| msgid ""
+#| "Are there translations of the GPL into other languages? <span class="
+#| "\"anchor-reference-id\">(<a href=\"#GPLTranslations\" >#GPLTranslations</"
+#| "a>)</span>"
+msgid ""
+"What does the GPL say about translating some code to a different programming "
+"language? <span class=\"anchor-reference-id\">(<a href=\"#TranslateCode\" "
+">#TranslateCode</a>)</span>"
+msgstr ""
+"Ð¡ÑÑÐµÑÑÐ²ÑÑÑ Ð»Ð¸ Ð¿ÐµÑÐµÐ²Ð¾Ð´Ñ GPL Ð½Ð° Ð´ÑÑÐ³Ð¸Ðµ ÑÐ·ÑÐºÐ¸? 
<span class=\"anchor-reference-id"
+"\">(<a href=\"#GPLTranslations\" >#GPLTranslations</a>)</span>"
+
+#. type: Content of: <dl><dd><p>
+msgid ""
+"Under copyright law, translation of a work is considered a kind of "
+"modification.  Therefore, what the GPL says about modified versions applies "
+"also to translated versions."
+msgstr ""
+
+#. type: Content of: <dl><dt>
 msgid ""
 "If a program combines public-domain code with GPL-covered code, can I take "
 "the public-domain part and use it as public domain code? <span class="
@@ -2071,6 +2125,86 @@
 "Ð¿ÑÐ¾Ð³ÑÐ°Ð¼Ð¼Ñ."
 
 #. type: Content of: <dl><dt>
+# | [-Are there translations-]{+Is it enough just to put a copy+} of the
+# | {+GNU+} GPL [-into other languages?-] {+in my repository?+} <span
+# | class=\"anchor-reference-id\">(<a [-href=\"#GPLTranslations\"
+# | >#GPLTranslations</a>)</span>-] {+href=\"#LicenseCopyOnly\"
+# | >#LicenseCopyOnly</a>)</span>+}
+#, fuzzy
+#| msgid ""
+#| "Are there translations of the GPL into other languages? <span class="
+#| "\"anchor-reference-id\">(<a href=\"#GPLTranslations\" >#GPLTranslations</"
+#| "a>)</span>"
+msgid ""
+"Is it enough just to put a copy of the GNU GPL in my repository? <span class="
+"\"anchor-reference-id\">(<a href=\"#LicenseCopyOnly\" >#LicenseCopyOnly</a>)"
+"</span>"
+msgstr ""
+"Ð¡ÑÑÐµÑÑÐ²ÑÑÑ Ð»Ð¸ Ð¿ÐµÑÐµÐ²Ð¾Ð´Ñ GPL Ð½Ð° Ð´ÑÑÐ³Ð¸Ðµ ÑÐ·ÑÐºÐ¸? 
<span class=\"anchor-reference-id"
+"\">(<a href=\"#GPLTranslations\" >#GPLTranslations</a>)</span>"
+
+#. type: Content of: <dl><dd><p>
+msgid ""
+"Just putting a copy of the GNU GPL in a file in your repository does not "
+"explicitly state that the code in the same repository may be used under the "
+"GNU GPL.  Without such a statement, it's not entirely clear that the "
+"permissions in the license really apply to any particular source file.  An "
+"explicit statement saying that eliminates all doubt."
+msgstr ""
+
+#. type: Content of: <dl><dd><p>
+msgid ""
+"A file containing just a license, without a statement that certain other "
+"files are covered by that license, resembles a file containing just a "
+"subroutine which is never called from anywhere else.  The resemblance is not "
+"perfect: lawyers and courts might apply common sense and conclude that you "
+"must have put the copy of the GNU GPL there because you wanted to license "
+"the code that way.  But why leave any uncertainty?"
+msgstr ""
+
+#. type: Content of: <dl><dd><p>
+msgid ""
+"This has nothing to do with the specifics of the GNU GPL.  It is true for "
+"any free license."
+msgstr ""
+
+#. type: Content of: <dl><dt>
+# | Why [-is the original BSD-] {+should I put a+} license [-incompatible with
+# | the GPL?-] {+notice in each source file?+} <span
+# | class=\"anchor-reference-id\">(<a [-href=\"#OrigBSD\"
+# | >#OrigBSD</a>)</span>-] {+href=\"#NoticeInSourceFile\"
+# | >#NoticeInSourceFile</a>)</span>+}
+#, fuzzy
+#| msgid ""
+#| "Why is the original BSD license incompatible with the GPL? <span class="
+#| "\"anchor-reference-id\">(<a href=\"#OrigBSD\" >#OrigBSD</a>)</span>"
+msgid ""
+"Why should I put a license notice in each source file? <span class=\"anchor-"
+"reference-id\">(<a href=\"#NoticeInSourceFile\" >#NoticeInSourceFile</a>)</"
+"span>"
+msgstr ""
+"ÐÐ¾ÑÐµÐ¼Ñ Ð¿ÐµÑÐ²Ð¾Ð½Ð°ÑÐ°Ð»ÑÐ½Ð°Ñ Ð»Ð¸ÑÐµÐ½Ð·Ð¸Ñ BSD 
Ð½ÐµÑÐ¾Ð²Ð¼ÐµÑÑÐ¸Ð¼Ð° Ñ GPL? <span class=\"anchor-"
+"reference-id\">(<a href=\"#OrigBSD\" >#OrigBSD</a>)</span>"
+
+#. type: Content of: <dl><dd><p>
+msgid ""
+"You should put a notice at the start of each source file, stating what "
+"license it carries, in order to avoid risk of the code's getting "
+"disconnected from its license.  If your repository's README says that source "
+"file is under the GNU GPL, what happens if someone copies that file to "
+"another program? That other context may not show what the file's license "
+"is.  It may appear to have some other license, or <a href=\"/licenses/"
+"license-list.html#NoLicense\">no license at all</a> (which would make the "
+"code nonfree)."
+msgstr ""
+
+#. type: Content of: <dl><dd><p>
+msgid ""
+"Adding a copyright notice and a license notice at the start of each source "
+"file is easy and makes such confusion unlikely."
+msgstr ""
+
+#. type: Content of: <dl><dt>
 msgid ""
 "What if the work is not very long? <span class=\"anchor-reference-id\">(<a "
 "href=\"#WhatIfWorkIsShort\" >#WhatIfWorkIsShort</a>)</span>"
@@ -2079,12 +2213,26 @@
 "href=\"#WhatIfWorkIsShort\" >#WhatIfWorkIsShort</a>)</span>"
 
 #. type: Content of: <dl><dd><p>
+# | If a whole software package contains very little code&mdash;less than 300
+# | lines is the benchmark we use&mdash;you may as well use a [-simple-] lax
+# | {+permissive+} license for it, rather than a copyleft license like the GNU
+# | GPL.  {+(Unless, that is, the code is specially important.)+}  We <a
+# | href=\"/licenses/license-recommendations.html#software\">recommend the
+# | Apache License 2.0</a> for such cases.
+#, fuzzy
+#| msgid ""
+#| "If a whole software package contains very little code&mdash;less than 300 "
+#| "lines is the benchmark we use&mdash;you may as well use a simple lax "
+#| "license for it, rather than a copyleft license like the GNU GPL.  We <a "
+#| "href=\"/licenses/license-recommendations.html#software\">recommend the "
+#| "Apache License 2.0</a> for such cases."
 msgid ""
 "If a whole software package contains very little code&mdash;less than 300 "
-"lines is the benchmark we use&mdash;you may as well use a simple lax license "
-"for it, rather than a copyleft license like the GNU GPL.  We <a href=\"/"
-"licenses/license-recommendations.html#software\">recommend the Apache "
-"License 2.0</a> for such cases."
+"lines is the benchmark we use&mdash;you may as well use a lax permissive "
+"license for it, rather than a copyleft license like the GNU GPL.  (Unless, "
+"that is, the code is specially important.)  We <a href=\"/licenses/license-"
+"recommendations.html#software\">recommend the Apache License 2.0</a> for "
+"such cases."
 msgstr ""
 "ÐÑÐ»Ð¸ Ð²ÐµÑÑ Ð¿Ð°ÐºÐµÑ Ð¿ÑÐ¾Ð³ÑÐ°Ð¼Ð¼ ÑÐ¾Ð´ÐµÑÐ¶Ð¸Ñ Ð¾ÑÐµÐ½Ñ 
Ð½ÐµÐ¼Ð½Ð¾Ð³Ð¾ ÑÐµÐºÑÑÐ°&nbsp;&mdash; Ð¿Ð¾ "
 "Ð½Ð°ÑÐµÐ¼Ñ ÐºÑÐ¸ÑÐµÑÐ¸Ñ, Ð¼ÐµÐ½ÑÑÐµ ÑÑÐµÑÑÐ¾Ñ 
ÑÑÑÐ¾Ðº&nbsp;&mdash; ÑÐ¾ Ð´Ð»Ñ Ð½ÐµÐ³Ð¾ Ð²Ð¿Ð¾Ð»Ð½Ðµ Ð¼Ð¾Ð¶Ð½Ð¾ "

Index: gpl-faq.ta.po
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/licenses/po/gpl-faq.ta.po,v
retrieving revision 1.33
retrieving revision 1.34
diff -u -b -r1.33 -r1.34
--- gpl-faq.ta.po       16 Dec 2013 22:59:35 -0000      1.33
+++ gpl-faq.ta.po       25 Jan 2014 14:59:06 -0000      1.34
@@ -5,7 +5,7 @@
 msgid ""
 msgstr ""
 "Project-Id-Version: \n"
-"POT-Creation-Date: 2013-12-16 21:55+0000\n"
+"POT-Creation-Date: 2014-01-25 14:55+0000\n"
 "PO-Revision-Date: 2010-06-20 15:55+0530\n"
 "Last-Translator: Amachu <address@hidden>\n"
 "Language-Team: Tamil <>\n"
@@ -287,6 +287,18 @@
 
 # type: Content of: <ul><li>
 #. type: Content of: <ul><li>
+#, fuzzy
+#| msgid ""
+#| "<a href=\"#GPLTranslations\">Are there translations of the GPL into other "
+#| "languages?</a>"
+msgid ""
+"<a href=\"#TranslateCode\">What does the GPL say about translating some code "
+"to a different programming language?</a>"
+msgstr ""
+"<a href=\"#GPLTranslations\">GPLà®à®©à¯ 
à®®à¯à®´à®¿à®ªà¯à®¯à®°à¯à®ªà¯à®ªà¯à®à®³à¯ à®ªà®¿à®± 
à®®à¯à®´à®¿à®à®³à®¿à®²à¯ à®à®¿à®à¯à®à¯à®à®¿à®±à®¤à®¾?</a>"
+
+# type: Content of: <ul><li>
+#. type: Content of: <ul><li>
 msgid ""
 "<a href=\"#CombinePublicDomainWithGPL\">If a program combines public-domain "
 "code with GPL-covered code, can I take the public-domain part and use it as "
@@ -495,6 +507,18 @@
 "instructions on how to apply the GPL to my program?</a>"
 msgstr ""
 
+#. type: Content of: <ul><li>
+msgid ""
+"<a href=\"#LicenseCopyOnly\">Is putting a copy of the GNU GPL in my "
+"repository enough to apply the GPL?</a>"
+msgstr ""
+
+#. type: Content of: <ul><li>
+msgid ""
+"<a href=\"#NoticeInSourceFile\">Why should I put a license notice in each "
+"source file?</a>"
+msgstr ""
+
 # type: Content of: <ul><li>
 #. type: Content of: <ul><li>
 msgid ""
@@ -1459,6 +1483,27 @@
 "all</a>)."
 msgstr ""
 
+# type: Content of: <ul><li>
+#. type: Content of: <dl><dt>
+#, fuzzy
+#| msgid ""
+#| "<a href=\"#WhyUseGPL\">Why should I use the GNU GPL rather than other "
+#| "free software licenses?</a>"
+msgid ""
+"What does the GPL say about translating some code to a different programming "
+"language? <span class=\"anchor-reference-id\">(<a href=\"#TranslateCode\" "
+">#TranslateCode</a>)</span>"
+msgstr ""
+"<a href=\"#WhyUseGPL\">à®à®©à¯à®¯ à®à®à¯à®à®±à¯à®± 
à®à®°à®¿à®®à®à¯à®à®³à¯ à®à®¾à®à¯à®à®¿à®²à¯à®®à¯ à®¨à®¾à®©à¯ 
à®à®©à¯ GNU GPLà® à®ªà®¯à®©à¯à®ªà®à¯à®¤à¯à®¤ "
+"à®µà¯à®£à¯à®à¯à®®à¯?</a>"
+
+#. type: Content of: <dl><dd><p>
+msgid ""
+"Under copyright law, translation of a work is considered a kind of "
+"modification.  Therefore, what the GPL says about modified versions applies "
+"also to translated versions."
+msgstr ""
+
 #. type: Content of: <dl><dt>
 msgid ""
 "If a program combines public-domain code with GPL-covered code, can I take "
@@ -1683,6 +1728,77 @@
 #| "<a href=\"#WhyUseGPL\">Why should I use the GNU GPL rather than other "
 #| "free software licenses?</a>"
 msgid ""
+"Is it enough just to put a copy of the GNU GPL in my repository? <span class="
+"\"anchor-reference-id\">(<a href=\"#LicenseCopyOnly\" >#LicenseCopyOnly</a>)"
+"</span>"
+msgstr ""
+"<a href=\"#WhyUseGPL\">à®à®©à¯à®¯ à®à®à¯à®à®±à¯à®± 
à®à®°à®¿à®®à®à¯à®à®³à¯ à®à®¾à®à¯à®à®¿à®²à¯à®®à¯ à®¨à®¾à®©à¯ 
à®à®©à¯ GNU GPLà® à®ªà®¯à®©à¯à®ªà®à¯à®¤à¯à®¤ "
+"à®µà¯à®£à¯à®à¯à®®à¯?</a>"
+
+#. type: Content of: <dl><dd><p>
+msgid ""
+"Just putting a copy of the GNU GPL in a file in your repository does not "
+"explicitly state that the code in the same repository may be used under the "
+"GNU GPL.  Without such a statement, it's not entirely clear that the "
+"permissions in the license really apply to any particular source file.  An "
+"explicit statement saying that eliminates all doubt."
+msgstr ""
+
+#. type: Content of: <dl><dd><p>
+msgid ""
+"A file containing just a license, without a statement that certain other "
+"files are covered by that license, resembles a file containing just a "
+"subroutine which is never called from anywhere else.  The resemblance is not "
+"perfect: lawyers and courts might apply common sense and conclude that you "
+"must have put the copy of the GNU GPL there because you wanted to license "
+"the code that way.  But why leave any uncertainty?"
+msgstr ""
+
+#. type: Content of: <dl><dd><p>
+msgid ""
+"This has nothing to do with the specifics of the GNU GPL.  It is true for "
+"any free license."
+msgstr ""
+
+# type: Content of: <ul><li>
+#. type: Content of: <dl><dt>
+#, fuzzy
+#| msgid ""
+#| "<a href=\"#WhyUseGPL\">Why should I use the GNU GPL rather than other "
+#| "free software licenses?</a>"
+msgid ""
+"Why should I put a license notice in each source file? <span class=\"anchor-"
+"reference-id\">(<a href=\"#NoticeInSourceFile\" >#NoticeInSourceFile</a>)</"
+"span>"
+msgstr ""
+"<a href=\"#WhyUseGPL\">à®à®©à¯à®¯ à®à®à¯à®à®±à¯à®± 
à®à®°à®¿à®®à®à¯à®à®³à¯ à®à®¾à®à¯à®à®¿à®²à¯à®®à¯ à®¨à®¾à®©à¯ 
à®à®©à¯ GNU GPLà® à®ªà®¯à®©à¯à®ªà®à¯à®¤à¯à®¤ "
+"à®µà¯à®£à¯à®à¯à®®à¯?</a>"
+
+#. type: Content of: <dl><dd><p>
+msgid ""
+"You should put a notice at the start of each source file, stating what "
+"license it carries, in order to avoid risk of the code's getting "
+"disconnected from its license.  If your repository's README says that source "
+"file is under the GNU GPL, what happens if someone copies that file to "
+"another program? That other context may not show what the file's license "
+"is.  It may appear to have some other license, or <a href=\"/licenses/"
+"license-list.html#NoLicense\">no license at all</a> (which would make the "
+"code nonfree)."
+msgstr ""
+
+#. type: Content of: <dl><dd><p>
+msgid ""
+"Adding a copyright notice and a license notice at the start of each source "
+"file is easy and makes such confusion unlikely."
+msgstr ""
+
+# type: Content of: <ul><li>
+#. type: Content of: <dl><dt>
+#, fuzzy
+#| msgid ""
+#| "<a href=\"#WhyUseGPL\">Why should I use the GNU GPL rather than other "
+#| "free software licenses?</a>"
+msgid ""
 "What if the work is not very long? <span class=\"anchor-reference-id\">(<a "
 "href=\"#WhatIfWorkIsShort\" >#WhatIfWorkIsShort</a>)</span>"
 msgstr ""
@@ -1692,10 +1808,11 @@
 #. type: Content of: <dl><dd><p>
 msgid ""
 "If a whole software package contains very little code&mdash;less than 300 "
-"lines is the benchmark we use&mdash;you may as well use a simple lax license "
-"for it, rather than a copyleft license like the GNU GPL.  We <a href=\"/"
-"licenses/license-recommendations.html#software\">recommend the Apache "
-"License 2.0</a> for such cases."
+"lines is the benchmark we use&mdash;you may as well use a lax permissive "
+"license for it, rather than a copyleft license like the GNU GPL.  (Unless, "
+"that is, the code is specially important.)  We <a href=\"/licenses/license-"
+"recommendations.html#software\">recommend the Apache License 2.0</a> for "
+"such cases."
 msgstr ""
 
 #. type: Content of: <dl><dt>
[Prev in Thread]
Current Thread
[Next in Thread]
www/licenses/po gpl-faq.es.po gpl-faq.fr.po gpl..., GNUN <=
Prev by Date: www/licenses gpl-faq.html
Next by Date: www layout.css
Previous by thread: www/licenses gpl-faq.html
Next by thread: www/philosophy/po government-free-software.fr.po
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread