[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
www/philosophy/sco/po sco-v-ibm.fr.po sco-witho...
From: |
Therese Godefroy |
Subject: |
www/philosophy/sco/po sco-v-ibm.fr.po sco-witho... |
Date: |
Thu, 02 Jan 2014 17:13:27 +0000 |
CVSROOT: /webcvs/www
Module name: www
Changes by: Therese Godefroy <th_g> 14/01/02 17:13:27
Modified files:
philosophy/sco/po: sco-v-ibm.fr.po sco-without-fear.fr.po
Log message:
French translation update
CVSWeb URLs:
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/sco/po/sco-v-ibm.fr.po?cvsroot=www&r1=1.28&r2=1.29
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/sco/po/sco-without-fear.fr.po?cvsroot=www&r1=1.29&r2=1.30
Patches:
Index: sco-v-ibm.fr.po
===================================================================
RCS file: /webcvs/www/www/philosophy/sco/po/sco-v-ibm.fr.po,v
retrieving revision 1.28
retrieving revision 1.29
diff -u -b -r1.28 -r1.29
--- sco-v-ibm.fr.po 1 Jan 2014 13:35:03 -0000 1.28
+++ sco-v-ibm.fr.po 2 Jan 2014 17:13:27 -0000 1.29
@@ -8,15 +8,15 @@
msgstr ""
"Project-Id-Version: sco-v-ibm.fr.html\n"
"POT-Creation-Date: 2014-01-01 13:32+0000\n"
-"PO-Revision-Date: 2013-08-30 11:18+0200\n"
+"PO-Revision-Date: 2014-01-02 18:11+0100\n"
"Last-Translator: Thérèse Godefroy <godef.th AT free.fr>\n"
"Language-Team: French <address@hidden>\n"
"Language: fr\n"
"MIME-Version: 1.0\n"
"Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8\n"
"Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit\n"
-"Outdated-Since: 2014-01-01 13:32+0000\n"
"Plural-Forms: \n"
+"X-Generator: Gtranslator 2.91.5\n"
#. type: Content of: <title>
msgid "FSF Statement on SCO v. IBM - GNU Project - Free Software Foundation"
@@ -133,62 +133,6 @@
"seul à remplir."
#. type: Content of: <p>
-# | SCO's confusing use of names makes the basis of its claims unclear: has
-# | SCO alleged that trade secrets of Unix's originator, AT&T—of
-# | which SCO is by intermediate transactions the successor in
-# | interest—have been incorporated by IBM in the kernel, Linux, or in
-# | parts of GNU? If the former, there is no justification for the broad
-# | statements urging the Fortune 1500 to be cautious about using free
-# | software, or GNU programs generally. If, on the other hand, SCO claims
-# | that GNU contains any Unix trade secret or copyrighted material, the claim
-# | is almost surely false. Contributors to the GNU Project promise to follow
-# | the Free Software Foundation's rules for the project, which
-# | specify—among other things—that contributors must not enter
-# | into non-disclosure agreements for technical information relevant to their
-# | work on GNU programs, and that they must not consult or make any use of
-# | source code from non-free programs, including specifically Unix. The
-# | Foundation has no basis to believe that GNU contains any material about
-# | which SCO or anyone else could assert valid trade secret or copyright
-# | claims. Contributors could have made misrepresentations of fact in their
-# | copyright assignment statements, but failing willful misrepresentation by
-# | a contributor, which has never happened so far as the Foundation is aware,
-# | there is no significant likelihood that our supervision of the freedom of
-# | our free software has failed. The Foundation notes that despite the
-# | alarmist statements SCO's employees have made, the Foundation has not been
-# | sued, nor has SCO, despite our requests, identified any work whose
-# | copyright the Foundation [-holds-including-] {+holds—including+} all
-# | of IBM's modifications to the kernel for use with IBM's S/390 mainframe
-# | computers, assigned to the Foundation by IBM—that SCO asserts
-# | infringes its rights in any way.
-#, fuzzy
-#| msgid ""
-#| "SCO's confusing use of names makes the basis of its claims unclear: has "
-#| "SCO alleged that trade secrets of Unix's originator, AT&T—of "
-#| "which SCO is by intermediate transactions the successor in interest—"
-#| "have been incorporated by IBM in the kernel, Linux, or in parts of GNU? "
-#| "If the former, there is no justification for the broad statements urging "
-#| "the Fortune 1500 to be cautious about using free software, or GNU "
-#| "programs generally. If, on the other hand, SCO claims that GNU contains "
-#| "any Unix trade secret or copyrighted material, the claim is almost surely "
-#| "false. Contributors to the GNU Project promise to follow the Free "
-#| "Software Foundation's rules for the project, which specify—among "
-#| "other things—that contributors must not enter into non-disclosure "
-#| "agreements for technical information relevant to their work on GNU "
-#| "programs, and that they must not consult or make any use of source code "
-#| "from non-free programs, including specifically Unix. The Foundation has "
-#| "no basis to believe that GNU contains any material about which SCO or "
-#| "anyone else could assert valid trade secret or copyright claims. "
-#| "Contributors could have made misrepresentations of fact in their "
-#| "copyright assignment statements, but failing willful misrepresentation by "
-#| "a contributor, which has never happened so far as the Foundation is "
-#| "aware, there is no significant likelihood that our supervision of the "
-#| "freedom of our free software has failed. The Foundation notes that "
-#| "despite the alarmist statements SCO's employees have made, the Foundation "
-#| "has not been sued, nor has SCO, despite our requests, identified any work "
-#| "whose copyright the Foundation holds-including all of IBM's modifications "
-#| "to the kernel for use with IBM's S/390 mainframe computers, assigned to "
-#| "the Foundation by IBM—that SCO asserts infringes its rights in any "
-#| "way."
msgid ""
"SCO's confusing use of names makes the basis of its claims unclear: has SCO "
"alleged that trade secrets of Unix's originator, AT&T—of which SCO "
Index: sco-without-fear.fr.po
===================================================================
RCS file: /webcvs/www/www/philosophy/sco/po/sco-without-fear.fr.po,v
retrieving revision 1.29
retrieving revision 1.30
diff -u -b -r1.29 -r1.30
--- sco-without-fear.fr.po 1 Jan 2014 20:58:44 -0000 1.29
+++ sco-without-fear.fr.po 2 Jan 2014 17:13:27 -0000 1.30
@@ -9,14 +9,13 @@
msgstr ""
"Project-Id-Version: sco-without-fear.html\n"
"POT-Creation-Date: 2014-01-01 20:55+0000\n"
-"PO-Revision-Date: 2013-11-30 19:00+0100\n"
+"PO-Revision-Date: 2014-01-02 18:11+0100\n"
"Last-Translator: Thérèse Godefroy <godef.th AT free.fr>\n"
"Language-Team: French <address@hidden>\n"
"Language: fr\n"
"MIME-Version: 1.0\n"
"Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8\n"
"Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit\n"
-"Outdated-Since: 2014-01-01 20:55+0000\n"
"Plural-Forms: \n"
"X-Generator: Gtranslator 2.91.5\n"
@@ -335,40 +334,6 @@
"cherché à fuir ses responsabilités. La loi ne permet pas ce double-jeu."
#. type: Content of: <p>
-# | So now it has become time for SCO and its lawyers to pound the table.
-# | SCO's response to IBM's counterclaim has been a round of absurd attacks on
-# | the GPL, its users, and its [-author,-] {+publisher,+} the Free Software
-# | Foundation. The GPL, SCO's answer to IBM's counterclaim alleges, violates
-# | not just federal statutes but also the United States Constitution. How a
-# | private copyright holder can violate the US Constitution by giving others
-# | permission to copy, modify and redistribute its work SCO does not deign to
-# | say. Legal theories aren't secrets; if SCO's lawyers had anything to
-# | offer in support of this novel proposition, they would offer it. Not one
-# | case decided in the long history of US copyright affords support to this
-# | ridiculous conception of an unconstitutional copyright license. No lawyer
-# | of my reasonably broad acquaintance, no matter what his or her view of the
-# | GPL may be, takes this moonshine seriously. After failing on the facts,
-# | failing on the law, and raising no more than derisive laughter from
-# | pounding the table, even the proverbial shyster is out of luck. What will
-# | we see next from SCO, an attack on the umpire?
-#, fuzzy
-#| msgid ""
-#| "So now it has become time for SCO and its lawyers to pound the table. "
-#| "SCO's response to IBM's counterclaim has been a round of absurd attacks "
-#| "on the GPL, its users, and its author, the Free Software Foundation. The "
-#| "GPL, SCO's answer to IBM's counterclaim alleges, violates not just "
-#| "federal statutes but also the United States Constitution. How a private "
-#| "copyright holder can violate the US Constitution by giving others "
-#| "permission to copy, modify and redistribute its work SCO does not deign "
-#| "to say. Legal theories aren't secrets; if SCO's lawyers had anything to "
-#| "offer in support of this novel proposition, they would offer it. Not one "
-#| "case decided in the long history of US copyright affords support to this "
-#| "ridiculous conception of an unconstitutional copyright license. No "
-#| "lawyer of my reasonably broad acquaintance, no matter what his or her "
-#| "view of the GPL may be, takes this moonshine seriously. After failing on "
-#| "the facts, failing on the law, and raising no more than derisive laughter "
-#| "from pounding the table, even the proverbial shyster is out of luck. "
-#| "What will we see next from SCO, an attack on the umpire?"
msgid ""
"So now it has become time for SCO and its lawyers to pound the table. SCO's "
"response to IBM's counterclaim has been a round of absurd attacks on the "
@@ -389,7 +354,7 @@
msgstr ""
"Ainsi le temps est venu pour SCO et ses avocats de taper du poing sur la "
"table. La réponse de SCO à la riposte d'IBM a été une suite d'attaques "
-"absurdes contre la GPL, ses utilisateurs et son auteur, la <cite>Free "
+"absurdes contre la GPL, ses utilisateurs et son éditeur, la <cite>Free "
"Software Foundation</cite>. SCO, en réponse à la demande reconventionnelle "
"d'IBM, prétend que la GPL viole non seulement les lois fédérales, mais
aussi "
"la Constitution des Ãtat-Unis. Comment une entité privée qui détient un "
[Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread] |
- www/philosophy/sco/po sco-v-ibm.fr.po sco-witho...,
Therese Godefroy <=