www-commits
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

www/philosophy/sco/po sco-v-ibm.fr.po sco-witho...


From: Therese Godefroy
Subject: www/philosophy/sco/po sco-v-ibm.fr.po sco-witho...
Date: Thu, 02 Jan 2014 17:13:27 +0000

CVSROOT:        /webcvs/www
Module name:    www
Changes by:     Therese Godefroy <th_g> 14/01/02 17:13:27

Modified files:
        philosophy/sco/po: sco-v-ibm.fr.po sco-without-fear.fr.po 

Log message:
        French translation update

CVSWeb URLs:
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/sco/po/sco-v-ibm.fr.po?cvsroot=www&r1=1.28&r2=1.29
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/sco/po/sco-without-fear.fr.po?cvsroot=www&r1=1.29&r2=1.30

Patches:
Index: sco-v-ibm.fr.po
===================================================================
RCS file: /webcvs/www/www/philosophy/sco/po/sco-v-ibm.fr.po,v
retrieving revision 1.28
retrieving revision 1.29
diff -u -b -r1.28 -r1.29
--- sco-v-ibm.fr.po     1 Jan 2014 13:35:03 -0000       1.28
+++ sco-v-ibm.fr.po     2 Jan 2014 17:13:27 -0000       1.29
@@ -8,15 +8,15 @@
 msgstr ""
 "Project-Id-Version: sco-v-ibm.fr.html\n"
 "POT-Creation-Date: 2014-01-01 13:32+0000\n"
-"PO-Revision-Date: 2013-08-30 11:18+0200\n"
+"PO-Revision-Date: 2014-01-02 18:11+0100\n"
 "Last-Translator: Thérèse Godefroy <godef.th AT free.fr>\n"
 "Language-Team: French <address@hidden>\n"
 "Language: fr\n"
 "MIME-Version: 1.0\n"
 "Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8\n"
 "Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit\n"
-"Outdated-Since: 2014-01-01 13:32+0000\n"
 "Plural-Forms: \n"
+"X-Generator: Gtranslator 2.91.5\n"
 
 #. type: Content of: <title>
 msgid "FSF Statement on SCO v. IBM - GNU Project - Free Software Foundation"
@@ -133,62 +133,6 @@
 "seul à remplir."
 
 #. type: Content of: <p>
-# | SCO's confusing use of names makes the basis of its claims unclear: has
-# | SCO alleged that trade secrets of Unix's originator, AT&amp;T&mdash;of
-# | which SCO is by intermediate transactions the successor in
-# | interest&mdash;have been incorporated by IBM in the kernel, Linux, or in
-# | parts of GNU? If the former, there is no justification for the broad
-# | statements urging the Fortune 1500 to be cautious about using free
-# | software, or GNU programs generally.  If, on the other hand, SCO claims
-# | that GNU contains any Unix trade secret or copyrighted material, the claim
-# | is almost surely false.  Contributors to the GNU Project promise to follow
-# | the Free Software Foundation's rules for the project, which
-# | specify&mdash;among other things&mdash;that contributors must not enter
-# | into non-disclosure agreements for technical information relevant to their
-# | work on GNU programs, and that they must not consult or make any use of
-# | source code from non-free programs, including specifically Unix.  The
-# | Foundation has no basis to believe that GNU contains any material about
-# | which SCO or anyone else could assert valid trade secret or copyright
-# | claims.  Contributors could have made misrepresentations of fact in their
-# | copyright assignment statements, but failing willful misrepresentation by
-# | a contributor, which has never happened so far as the Foundation is aware,
-# | there is no significant likelihood that our supervision of the freedom of
-# | our free software has failed.  The Foundation notes that despite the
-# | alarmist statements SCO's employees have made, the Foundation has not been
-# | sued, nor has SCO, despite our requests, identified any work whose
-# | copyright the Foundation [-holds-including-] {+holds&mdash;including+} all
-# | of IBM's modifications to the kernel for use with IBM's S/390 mainframe
-# | computers, assigned to the Foundation by IBM&mdash;that SCO asserts
-# | infringes its rights in any way.
-#, fuzzy
-#| msgid ""
-#| "SCO's confusing use of names makes the basis of its claims unclear: has "
-#| "SCO alleged that trade secrets of Unix's originator, AT&amp;T&mdash;of "
-#| "which SCO is by intermediate transactions the successor in interest&mdash;"
-#| "have been incorporated by IBM in the kernel, Linux, or in parts of GNU? "
-#| "If the former, there is no justification for the broad statements urging "
-#| "the Fortune 1500 to be cautious about using free software, or GNU "
-#| "programs generally.  If, on the other hand, SCO claims that GNU contains "
-#| "any Unix trade secret or copyrighted material, the claim is almost surely "
-#| "false.  Contributors to the GNU Project promise to follow the Free "
-#| "Software Foundation's rules for the project, which specify&mdash;among "
-#| "other things&mdash;that contributors must not enter into non-disclosure "
-#| "agreements for technical information relevant to their work on GNU "
-#| "programs, and that they must not consult or make any use of source code "
-#| "from non-free programs, including specifically Unix.  The Foundation has "
-#| "no basis to believe that GNU contains any material about which SCO or "
-#| "anyone else could assert valid trade secret or copyright claims.  "
-#| "Contributors could have made misrepresentations of fact in their "
-#| "copyright assignment statements, but failing willful misrepresentation by "
-#| "a contributor, which has never happened so far as the Foundation is "
-#| "aware, there is no significant likelihood that our supervision of the "
-#| "freedom of our free software has failed.  The Foundation notes that "
-#| "despite the alarmist statements SCO's employees have made, the Foundation "
-#| "has not been sued, nor has SCO, despite our requests, identified any work "
-#| "whose copyright the Foundation holds-including all of IBM's modifications "
-#| "to the kernel for use with IBM's S/390 mainframe computers, assigned to "
-#| "the Foundation by IBM&mdash;that SCO asserts infringes its rights in any "
-#| "way."
 msgid ""
 "SCO's confusing use of names makes the basis of its claims unclear: has SCO "
 "alleged that trade secrets of Unix's originator, AT&amp;T&mdash;of which SCO "

Index: sco-without-fear.fr.po
===================================================================
RCS file: /webcvs/www/www/philosophy/sco/po/sco-without-fear.fr.po,v
retrieving revision 1.29
retrieving revision 1.30
diff -u -b -r1.29 -r1.30
--- sco-without-fear.fr.po      1 Jan 2014 20:58:44 -0000       1.29
+++ sco-without-fear.fr.po      2 Jan 2014 17:13:27 -0000       1.30
@@ -9,14 +9,13 @@
 msgstr ""
 "Project-Id-Version: sco-without-fear.html\n"
 "POT-Creation-Date: 2014-01-01 20:55+0000\n"
-"PO-Revision-Date: 2013-11-30 19:00+0100\n"
+"PO-Revision-Date: 2014-01-02 18:11+0100\n"
 "Last-Translator: Thérèse Godefroy <godef.th AT free.fr>\n"
 "Language-Team: French <address@hidden>\n"
 "Language: fr\n"
 "MIME-Version: 1.0\n"
 "Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8\n"
 "Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit\n"
-"Outdated-Since: 2014-01-01 20:55+0000\n"
 "Plural-Forms:  \n"
 "X-Generator: Gtranslator 2.91.5\n"
 
@@ -335,40 +334,6 @@
 "cherché à fuir ses responsabilités. La loi ne permet pas ce double-jeu."
 
 #. type: Content of: <p>
-# | So now it has become time for SCO and its lawyers to pound the table. 
-# | SCO's response to IBM's counterclaim has been a round of absurd attacks on
-# | the GPL, its users, and its [-author,-] {+publisher,+} the Free Software
-# | Foundation.  The GPL, SCO's answer to IBM's counterclaim alleges, violates
-# | not just federal statutes but also the United States Constitution.  How a
-# | private copyright holder can violate the US Constitution by giving others
-# | permission to copy, modify and redistribute its work SCO does not deign to
-# | say.  Legal theories aren't secrets; if SCO's lawyers had anything to
-# | offer in support of this novel proposition, they would offer it.  Not one
-# | case decided in the long history of US copyright affords support to this
-# | ridiculous conception of an unconstitutional copyright license.  No lawyer
-# | of my reasonably broad acquaintance, no matter what his or her view of the
-# | GPL may be, takes this moonshine seriously.  After failing on the facts,
-# | failing on the law, and raising no more than derisive laughter from
-# | pounding the table, even the proverbial shyster is out of luck.  What will
-# | we see next from SCO, an attack on the umpire?
-#, fuzzy
-#| msgid ""
-#| "So now it has become time for SCO and its lawyers to pound the table.  "
-#| "SCO's response to IBM's counterclaim has been a round of absurd attacks "
-#| "on the GPL, its users, and its author, the Free Software Foundation.  The "
-#| "GPL, SCO's answer to IBM's counterclaim alleges, violates not just "
-#| "federal statutes but also the United States Constitution.  How a private "
-#| "copyright holder can violate the US Constitution by giving others "
-#| "permission to copy, modify and redistribute its work SCO does not deign "
-#| "to say.  Legal theories aren't secrets; if SCO's lawyers had anything to "
-#| "offer in support of this novel proposition, they would offer it.  Not one "
-#| "case decided in the long history of US copyright affords support to this "
-#| "ridiculous conception of an unconstitutional copyright license.  No "
-#| "lawyer of my reasonably broad acquaintance, no matter what his or her "
-#| "view of the GPL may be, takes this moonshine seriously.  After failing on "
-#| "the facts, failing on the law, and raising no more than derisive laughter "
-#| "from pounding the table, even the proverbial shyster is out of luck.  "
-#| "What will we see next from SCO, an attack on the umpire?"
 msgid ""
 "So now it has become time for SCO and its lawyers to pound the table.  SCO's "
 "response to IBM's counterclaim has been a round of absurd attacks on the "
@@ -389,7 +354,7 @@
 msgstr ""
 "Ainsi le temps est venu pour SCO et ses avocats de taper du poing sur la "
 "table. La réponse de SCO à la riposte d'IBM a été une suite d'attaques "
-"absurdes contre la GPL, ses utilisateurs et son auteur, la <cite>Free "
+"absurdes contre la GPL, ses utilisateurs et son éditeur, la <cite>Free "
 "Software Foundation</cite>. SCO, en réponse à la demande reconventionnelle "
 "d'IBM, prétend que la GPL viole non seulement les lois fédérales, mais 
aussi "
 "la Constitution des État-Unis. Comment une entité privée qui détient un "



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]