www/philosophy/sco/po sco-without-fear.fr.po sc...

[GNUN]

CVSROOT:        /web/www
Module name:    www
Changes by:     GNUN <gnun>     14/01/01 20:58:44

Modified files:
        philosophy/sco/po: sco-without-fear.fr.po sco-without-fear.pot 
                           sco-without-fear.ru.po 

Log message:
        Automatic update by GNUnited Nations.

CVSWeb URLs:
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/sco/po/sco-without-fear.fr.po?cvsroot=www&r1=1.28&r2=1.29
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/sco/po/sco-without-fear.pot?cvsroot=www&r1=1.10&r2=1.11
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/sco/po/sco-without-fear.ru.po?cvsroot=www&r1=1.5&r2=1.6

Patches:
Index: sco-without-fear.fr.po
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/sco/po/sco-without-fear.fr.po,v
retrieving revision 1.28
retrieving revision 1.29
diff -u -b -r1.28 -r1.29
--- sco-without-fear.fr.po      30 Nov 2013 21:15:46 -0000      1.28
+++ sco-without-fear.fr.po      1 Jan 2014 20:58:44 -0000       1.29
@@ -8,7 +8,7 @@
 msgid ""
 msgstr ""
 "Project-Id-Version: sco-without-fear.html\n"
-"POT-Creation-Date: 2013-08-26 08:55+0000\n"
+"POT-Creation-Date: 2014-01-01 20:55+0000\n"
 "PO-Revision-Date: 2013-11-30 19:00+0100\n"
 "Last-Translator: Thérèse Godefroy <godef.th AT free.fr>\n"
 "Language-Team: French <address@hidden>\n"
@@ -16,6 +16,7 @@
 "MIME-Version: 1.0\n"
 "Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8\n"
 "Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit\n"
+"Outdated-Since: 2014-01-01 20:55+0000\n"
 "Plural-Forms:  \n"
 "X-Generator: Gtranslator 2.91.5\n"
 
@@ -334,10 +335,44 @@
 "cherché à fuir ses responsabilités. La loi ne permet pas ce double-jeu."
 
 #. type: Content of: <p>
+# | So now it has become time for SCO and its lawyers to pound the table. 
+# | SCO's response to IBM's counterclaim has been a round of absurd attacks on
+# | the GPL, its users, and its [-author,-] {+publisher,+} the Free Software
+# | Foundation.  The GPL, SCO's answer to IBM's counterclaim alleges, violates
+# | not just federal statutes but also the United States Constitution.  How a
+# | private copyright holder can violate the US Constitution by giving others
+# | permission to copy, modify and redistribute its work SCO does not deign to
+# | say.  Legal theories aren't secrets; if SCO's lawyers had anything to
+# | offer in support of this novel proposition, they would offer it.  Not one
+# | case decided in the long history of US copyright affords support to this
+# | ridiculous conception of an unconstitutional copyright license.  No lawyer
+# | of my reasonably broad acquaintance, no matter what his or her view of the
+# | GPL may be, takes this moonshine seriously.  After failing on the facts,
+# | failing on the law, and raising no more than derisive laughter from
+# | pounding the table, even the proverbial shyster is out of luck.  What will
+# | we see next from SCO, an attack on the umpire?
+#, fuzzy
+#| msgid ""
+#| "So now it has become time for SCO and its lawyers to pound the table.  "
+#| "SCO's response to IBM's counterclaim has been a round of absurd attacks "
+#| "on the GPL, its users, and its author, the Free Software Foundation.  The "
+#| "GPL, SCO's answer to IBM's counterclaim alleges, violates not just "
+#| "federal statutes but also the United States Constitution.  How a private "
+#| "copyright holder can violate the US Constitution by giving others "
+#| "permission to copy, modify and redistribute its work SCO does not deign "
+#| "to say.  Legal theories aren't secrets; if SCO's lawyers had anything to "
+#| "offer in support of this novel proposition, they would offer it.  Not one "
+#| "case decided in the long history of US copyright affords support to this "
+#| "ridiculous conception of an unconstitutional copyright license.  No "
+#| "lawyer of my reasonably broad acquaintance, no matter what his or her "
+#| "view of the GPL may be, takes this moonshine seriously.  After failing on "
+#| "the facts, failing on the law, and raising no more than derisive laughter "
+#| "from pounding the table, even the proverbial shyster is out of luck.  "
+#| "What will we see next from SCO, an attack on the umpire?"
 msgid ""
 "So now it has become time for SCO and its lawyers to pound the table.  SCO's "
 "response to IBM's counterclaim has been a round of absurd attacks on the "
-"GPL, its users, and its author, the Free Software Foundation.  The GPL, "
+"GPL, its users, and its publisher, the Free Software Foundation.  The GPL, "
 "SCO's answer to IBM's counterclaim alleges, violates not just federal "
 "statutes but also the United States Constitution.  How a private copyright "
 "holder can violate the US Constitution by giving others permission to copy, "

Index: sco-without-fear.pot
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/sco/po/sco-without-fear.pot,v
retrieving revision 1.10
retrieving revision 1.11
diff -u -b -r1.10 -r1.11
--- sco-without-fear.pot        26 Aug 2013 09:00:51 -0000      1.10
+++ sco-without-fear.pot        1 Jan 2014 20:58:44 -0000       1.11
@@ -7,7 +7,7 @@
 msgid ""
 msgstr ""
 "Project-Id-Version: sco-without-fear.html\n"
-"POT-Creation-Date: 2013-08-26 08:55+0000\n"
+"POT-Creation-Date: 2014-01-01 20:55+0000\n"
 "PO-Revision-Date: YEAR-MO-DA HO:MI+ZONE\n"
 "Last-Translator: FULL NAME <address@hidden>\n"
 "Language-Team: LANGUAGE <address@hidden>\n"
@@ -201,7 +201,7 @@
 msgid ""
 "So now it has become time for SCO and its lawyers to pound the table.  SCO's "
 "response to IBM's counterclaim has been a round of absurd attacks on the "
-"GPL, its users, and its author, the Free Software Foundation.  The GPL, "
+"GPL, its users, and its publisher, the Free Software Foundation.  The GPL, "
 "SCO's answer to IBM's counterclaim alleges, violates not just federal "
 "statutes but also the United States Constitution.  How a private copyright "
 "holder can violate the US Constitution by giving others permission to copy, "

Index: sco-without-fear.ru.po
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/sco/po/sco-without-fear.ru.po,v
retrieving revision 1.5
retrieving revision 1.6
diff -u -b -r1.5 -r1.6
--- sco-without-fear.ru.po      26 Aug 2013 09:29:28 -0000      1.5
+++ sco-without-fear.ru.po      1 Jan 2014 20:58:44 -0000       1.6
@@ -7,7 +7,7 @@
 msgid ""
 msgstr ""
 "Project-Id-Version: sco-without-fear.html\n"
-"POT-Creation-Date: 2013-08-26 08:55+0000\n"
+"POT-Creation-Date: 2014-01-01 20:55+0000\n"
 "PO-Revision-Date: 2013-03-29 16:21+0400\n"
 "Last-Translator: Ineiev <address@hidden>\n"
 "Language-Team: Russian <address@hidden>\n"
@@ -15,6 +15,7 @@
 "MIME-Version: 1.0\n"
 "Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8\n"
 "Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit\n"
+"Outdated-Since: 2014-01-01 20:55+0000\n"
 
 #. type: Content of: <title>
 msgid ""
@@ -336,10 +337,44 @@
 "одновременно и то, и другое."
 
 #. type: Content of: <p>
+# | So now it has become time for SCO and its lawyers to pound the table. 
+# | SCO's response to IBM's counterclaim has been a round of absurd attacks on
+# | the GPL, its users, and its [-author,-] {+publisher,+} the Free Software
+# | Foundation.  The GPL, SCO's answer to IBM's counterclaim alleges, violates
+# | not just federal statutes but also the United States Constitution.  How a
+# | private copyright holder can violate the US Constitution by giving others
+# | permission to copy, modify and redistribute its work SCO does not deign to
+# | say.  Legal theories aren't secrets; if SCO's lawyers had anything to
+# | offer in support of this novel proposition, they would offer it.  Not one
+# | case decided in the long history of US copyright affords support to this
+# | ridiculous conception of an unconstitutional copyright license.  No lawyer
+# | of my reasonably broad acquaintance, no matter what his or her view of the
+# | GPL may be, takes this moonshine seriously.  After failing on the facts,
+# | failing on the law, and raising no more than derisive laughter from
+# | pounding the table, even the proverbial shyster is out of luck.  What will
+# | we see next from SCO, an attack on the umpire?
+#, fuzzy
+#| msgid ""
+#| "So now it has become time for SCO and its lawyers to pound the table.  "
+#| "SCO's response to IBM's counterclaim has been a round of absurd attacks "
+#| "on the GPL, its users, and its author, the Free Software Foundation.  The "
+#| "GPL, SCO's answer to IBM's counterclaim alleges, violates not just "
+#| "federal statutes but also the United States Constitution.  How a private "
+#| "copyright holder can violate the US Constitution by giving others "
+#| "permission to copy, modify and redistribute its work SCO does not deign "
+#| "to say.  Legal theories aren't secrets; if SCO's lawyers had anything to "
+#| "offer in support of this novel proposition, they would offer it.  Not one "
+#| "case decided in the long history of US copyright affords support to this "
+#| "ridiculous conception of an unconstitutional copyright license.  No "
+#| "lawyer of my reasonably broad acquaintance, no matter what his or her "
+#| "view of the GPL may be, takes this moonshine seriously.  After failing on "
+#| "the facts, failing on the law, and raising no more than derisive laughter "
+#| "from pounding the table, even the proverbial shyster is out of luck.  "
+#| "What will we see next from SCO, an attack on the umpire?"
 msgid ""
 "So now it has become time for SCO and its lawyers to pound the table.  SCO's "
 "response to IBM's counterclaim has been a round of absurd attacks on the "
-"GPL, its users, and its author, the Free Software Foundation.  The GPL, "
+"GPL, its users, and its publisher, the Free Software Foundation.  The GPL, "
 "SCO's answer to IBM's counterclaim alleges, violates not just federal "
 "statutes but also the United States Constitution.  How a private copyright "
 "holder can violate the US Constitution by giving others permission to copy, "