www-commits
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

www/philosophy open-source-misses-the-point.html


From: Richard M. Stallman
Subject: www/philosophy open-source-misses-the-point.html
Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2013 12:07:51 +0000

CVSROOT:        /web/www
Module name:    www
Changes by:     Richard M. Stallman <rms>       13/11/26 12:07:50

Modified files:
        philosophy     : open-source-misses-the-point.html 

Log message:
        Cleanup of my previous change.

CVSWeb URLs:
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/open-source-misses-the-point.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.66&r2=1.67

Patches:
Index: open-source-misses-the-point.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/open-source-misses-the-point.html,v
retrieving revision 1.66
retrieving revision 1.67
diff -u -b -r1.66 -r1.67
--- open-source-misses-the-point.html   20 Nov 2013 18:56:10 -0000      1.66
+++ open-source-misses-the-point.html   26 Nov 2013 12:07:39 -0000      1.67
@@ -342,8 +342,10 @@
 <p> The terms &ldquo;FLOSS&rdquo; and &ldquo;FOSS&rdquo; are used to
 be <a href="/philosophy/floss-and-foss.html"> neutral between free
 software and open source</a>.  If neutrality is your goal,
-&ldquo;FLOSS&rdquo; does it better.  But if you want to stand up for
-freedom, using these neutral terms is not the way to do it.</p>
+&ldquo;FLOSS&rdquo; is the better of the two, since it really is
+neutral.  But if you want to stand up for freedom, using a neutral
+term isn't the way.  Standing up for freedom entails showing people
+your support for freedom.</p>
 
 <h3>Conclusion</h3>
 
@@ -412,7 +414,7 @@
 
 <p>Updated:
 <!-- timestamp start -->
-$Date: 2013/11/20 18:56:10 $
+$Date: 2013/11/26 12:07:39 $
 <!-- timestamp end -->
 </p>
 </div>



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]