[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
www/philosophy open-source-misses-the-point.html
From: |
Richard M. Stallman |
Subject: |
www/philosophy open-source-misses-the-point.html |
Date: |
Tue, 26 Nov 2013 12:07:51 +0000 |
CVSROOT: /web/www
Module name: www
Changes by: Richard M. Stallman <rms> 13/11/26 12:07:50
Modified files:
philosophy : open-source-misses-the-point.html
Log message:
Cleanup of my previous change.
CVSWeb URLs:
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/open-source-misses-the-point.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.66&r2=1.67
Patches:
Index: open-source-misses-the-point.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/open-source-misses-the-point.html,v
retrieving revision 1.66
retrieving revision 1.67
diff -u -b -r1.66 -r1.67
--- open-source-misses-the-point.html 20 Nov 2013 18:56:10 -0000 1.66
+++ open-source-misses-the-point.html 26 Nov 2013 12:07:39 -0000 1.67
@@ -342,8 +342,10 @@
<p> The terms “FLOSS” and “FOSS” are used to
be <a href="/philosophy/floss-and-foss.html"> neutral between free
software and open source</a>. If neutrality is your goal,
-“FLOSS” does it better. But if you want to stand up for
-freedom, using these neutral terms is not the way to do it.</p>
+“FLOSS” is the better of the two, since it really is
+neutral. But if you want to stand up for freedom, using a neutral
+term isn't the way. Standing up for freedom entails showing people
+your support for freedom.</p>
<h3>Conclusion</h3>
@@ -412,7 +414,7 @@
<p>Updated:
<!-- timestamp start -->
-$Date: 2013/11/20 18:56:10 $
+$Date: 2013/11/26 12:07:39 $
<!-- timestamp end -->
</p>
</div>