[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
www/philosophy po/ubuntu-spyware.hr.po po/ubunt...
|
From: |
GNUN |
|
Subject: |
www/philosophy po/ubuntu-spyware.hr.po po/ubunt... |
|
Date: |
Mon, 09 Sep 2013 07:03:27 +0000 |
CVSROOT: /web/www
Module name: www
Changes by: GNUN <gnun> 13/09/09 07:03:27
Modified files:
philosophy/po : ubuntu-spyware.hr.po ubuntu-spyware.translist
Added files:
philosophy : ubuntu-spyware.hr.html
philosophy/po : ubuntu-spyware.hr-en.html
Log message:
Automatic update by GNUnited Nations.
CVSWeb URLs:
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/ubuntu-spyware.hr.html?cvsroot=www&rev=1.1
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/po/ubuntu-spyware.hr.po?cvsroot=www&r1=1.3&r2=1.4
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/po/ubuntu-spyware.translist?cvsroot=www&r1=1.8&r2=1.9
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/po/ubuntu-spyware.hr-en.html?cvsroot=www&rev=1.1
Patches:
Index: po/ubuntu-spyware.hr.po
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/po/ubuntu-spyware.hr.po,v
retrieving revision 1.3
retrieving revision 1.4
diff -u -b -r1.3 -r1.4
--- po/ubuntu-spyware.hr.po 9 Sep 2013 06:54:11 -0000 1.3
+++ po/ubuntu-spyware.hr.po 9 Sep 2013 07:03:26 -0000 1.4
@@ -14,7 +14,6 @@
"MIME-Version: 1.0\n"
"Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8\n"
"Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit\n"
-"Outdated-Since: 2012-12-22 17:55-0500\n"
"Plural-Forms: nplurals=2; plural=(n!=1);\n"
"X-Poedit-SourceCharset: UTF-8\n"
"X-Generator: Poedit 1.5.4\n"
@@ -310,21 +309,12 @@
"drugom obliku negativnog utjecaja koji Ubuntu vrši u zajednici slobodnog "
"softvera, a to je legitimiziranje neslobodnog softvera."
-# | *GNUN-SLOT: TRANSLATOR'S [-CREDITS*-] {+NOTES*+}
#. TRANSLATORS: Use space (SPC) as msgstr if you don't have notes.
#. type: Content of: <div>
-#| msgid "*GNUN-SLOT: TRANSLATOR'S CREDITS*"
msgid "*GNUN-SLOT: TRANSLATOR'S NOTES*"
msgstr " "
-# || No change detected. The change might only be in amounts of spaces.
#. type: Content of: <div><p>
-#| msgid ""
-#| "Please send general FSF & GNU inquiries to <a
href=\"mailto:address@hidden";
-#| "org\"><address@hidden></a>. There are also <a href=\"/contact/"
-#| "\">other ways to contact</a> the FSF. Broken links and other corrections "
-#| "or suggestions can be sent to <a href=\"mailto:address@hidden";><"
-#| "address@hidden></a>."
msgid ""
"Please send general FSF & GNU inquiries to <a
href=\"mailto:address@hidden";
"\"><address@hidden></a>. There are also <a href=\"/contact/\">other
ways "
Index: po/ubuntu-spyware.translist
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/po/ubuntu-spyware.translist,v
retrieving revision 1.8
retrieving revision 1.9
diff -u -b -r1.8 -r1.9
--- po/ubuntu-spyware.translist 27 Jul 2013 11:29:47 -0000 1.8
+++ po/ubuntu-spyware.translist 9 Sep 2013 07:03:26 -0000 1.9
@@ -6,6 +6,7 @@
<span dir="ltr"><a lang="de" hreflang="de"
href="/philosophy/ubuntu-spyware.de.html">Deutsch</a> [de]</span>
<span dir="ltr"><a lang="es" hreflang="es"
href="/philosophy/ubuntu-spyware.es.html">español</a> [es]</span>
<span dir="ltr"><a lang="fr" hreflang="fr"
href="/philosophy/ubuntu-spyware.fr.html">français</a> [fr]</span>
+<span dir="ltr"><a lang="hr" hreflang="hr"
href="/philosophy/ubuntu-spyware.hr.html">hrvatski</a> [hr]</span>
<span dir="ltr"><a lang="ru" hreflang="ru"
href="/philosophy/ubuntu-spyware.ru.html">ÑÑÑÑкий</a> [ru]</span>
</p>
</div>' -->
Index: ubuntu-spyware.hr.html
===================================================================
RCS file: ubuntu-spyware.hr.html
diff -N ubuntu-spyware.hr.html
--- /dev/null 1 Jan 1970 00:00:00 -0000
+++ ubuntu-spyware.hr.html 9 Sep 2013 07:03:24 -0000 1.1
@@ -0,0 +1,221 @@
+
+
+<!--#include virtual="/server/header.hr.html" -->
+<!-- Parent-Version: 1.75 -->
+
+<!-- This file is automatically generated by GNUnited Nations! -->
+ <!--#set var="ENGLISH_PAGE" value="/philosophy/ubuntu-spyware.en.html" -->
+
+<title>Ubuntu je Å¡pijunski softver: Å to uÄiniti? - Projekt GNU - Zaklada za
+slobodan softver</title>
+
+<!--#include virtual="/philosophy/po/ubuntu-spyware.translist" -->
+<!--#include virtual="/server/banner.hr.html" -->
+<h2>Ubuntu je Å¡pijunski softver: Å to uÄiniti?</h2>
+
+<p>napisao <a href="http://www.stallman.org/";>Richard Stallman</a></p>
+
+<p>Jedna od glavnih prednosti slobodnog softvera je da zajednica Å¡titi
+korisnike od zlonamjernog softvera. Sada je Ubuntu <a
+href="/gnu/linux-and-gnu.html"> GNU/Linux </a> postao primjer suprotnog. Å to
+mi kao korisnici možemo uÄiniti?</p>
+
+<p>VlasniÄki je softver povezan sa zlonamjernim postupcima prema korisniku:
+ubaÄeni kod za nadzor, digitalne lisice (DRM ili upravljanje digitalnim
+ograniÄenjima) i skriveni udaljeni pristup raÄunalu mogu korisniku uÄiniti
+dosta neugodnih stvari. Programe koji rade takve stvari treba tretirati
+jednako kao i Å¡pijunski softver (malware). NajÄeÅ¡Äi su primjeri Windows,
+iProizvodi i Amazon “Kindle”, koji koriste sva tri postupka;
+Macintosh i Playstation III, koji su nametnuli DRM, veÄina mobilnih
+telefona, koji Å¡pijuniraju korisnike i pružaju skriveni pristup ureÄaju;
+Adobe Flash Player, koji Å¡pijunira i nameÄe DRM, te mnoge aplikacije za
+iPhone i Android, koje rade jednu ili više ovakvih ružnih stvari.</p>
+
+<p>Slobodan softver korisniku pruža priliku da se zaštiti od zlonamjernog
+softvera. Osim toga, najÄeÅ¡Äe zajednica Å¡titi sve korisnike, tako da
veÄina
+ljudi ne mora niÅ¡ta uÄiniti da bi se zaÅ¡titila. Evo na koji naÄin.</p>
+
+<p>Ponekad korisnici koji se razumiju u programiranje naiÄu na slobodan
program
+koji u sebi ima zlonamjerni kod. UobiÄajeno je da se tada izdaje ispravljena
+inaÄica takvog programa (ali ne pod istim imenom). Uz Äetiri slobode koje
+definiraju slobodni softver (pogledaj <a
+href="/philosophy/free-sw.html">http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/free-sw.html</a>),
+oni su u moguÄnosti to uÄiniti. To se naziva "forkanje" programa. Ubrzo se
+zajednica prebacuje na tu drugu, ispravljenu verziju (fork), dok se
+zlonamjerna verzija odbacuje. Å anse za neslavnu propast zlonamjernog
+programa su velike tako da i oni kojima savjest ili društvene norme nisu
+prepreka za takve aktivnosti uglavnom zaziru od toga. </p>
+
+<p>Ali ne uvijek. Ubuntu, Å¡iroko rasprostranjena i utjecajna distribucija <a
+href="/gnu/linux-and-gnu.html">GNU/Linuxa </a>, ima instaliran nadzorni
+kod. Kad korisnik pretražuje neki izraz u vlastitim lokalnim datotekama
+koristeÄi Ubuntuovo suÄelje, Ubuntu Å¡alje taj izraz na neki od Canonicalovih
+servera. (Canonical je kompanija koja razvija Ubuntu.) </p>
+
+<p>To je upravo poput prvog sluÄaja nadzora u Windowsima s kojima sam se
+upoznao. Moj mi je pokojni prijatelj Fravia ispriÄao da, dok je u lokalnim
+datotekama Windowsa tražio neki izraz, njegov vatrozid je otkrio slanje
+paketa nekakvom serveru. Nakon tog prvog primjera, poÄeo sam obraÄati
+pozornost na takve stvari, te uoÄio sklonost vlasniÄkog softvera
+“uglednih” softverskih firmi prema Å¡pijuniranju. Možda i nije
+tek stjecaj okolnosti da Ubuntu Å¡alje iste informacije.</p>
+
+<p>Ubuntu koristi te informacije da bi prikazivao reklame za kupnju proizvoda
+na Amazonu. Amazon Äini razne loÅ¡e stvari (pogledaj <a
+href="http://stallman.org/amazon.html";>http://stallman.org/amazon.html</a>);
+a reklamirajuÄi Amazon i Canonical sudjeluje u njima. MeÄutim, najveÄi
+problem nisu reklame. NajveÄi problem je Å¡pijuniranje. Iz Canonicala tvrde
+da ne šalju Amazonu podatke o tome tko je što tražio. Svejedno, prikupljanje
+osobnih podataka nije u redu, bio to Canonical ili Amazon.</p>
+
+<p>Ljudi Äe vjerojatno napraviti preraÄene inaÄice Ubuntua bez takvog
+nadzora. U stvari, nekoliko GNU/Linux distribucija je nastalo od
+Ubuntua. Kad se te distribucije ažuriraju na novu Ubuntuovu osnovu, oÄekujem
+da Äe izbaciti nadzor iz svojih inaÄica. To svakako oÄekuje i Canonical.</p>
+
+<p>VeÄina bi razvijatelja slobodnog softvera napustila ovakav plan ako bi
imala
+priliku prebaciti se na drugu, ispravljenu verziju. Ali Canonical nije
+napustio Ubuntu spyware. Vjerojatno Canonical raÄuna da ime
+“Ubuntu” ima toliki momenat i utjecaj da može izbjeÄi uobiÄajene
+posljedice i izvuÄi se s nadziranjem korisnika.</p>
+
+<p>Canonical tvrdi da se internet tako samo pretražuje na drugaÄiji
+naÄin. Ovisno o detaljima, to može uÄiniti problem veÄim, ali svakako ne
+manjim.</p>
+
+<p>Ubuntu dopuÅ¡ta korisniku iskljuÄivanje nadzora. OÄito je da u Canonicalu
+misle da Äe veÄina korisnika Ubuntua ostaviti nadzor ukljuÄenim. I mnogi to
+i Äine, zato Å¡to nisu svjesni toga i da bi trebali neÅ¡to uÄiniti s tim u
+vezi. Tako da postojanje tog prekidaÄa ne Äini samim time i nadzor
+opravdanim.</p>
+
+<p>Äak i da je Å¡pijuniranje u startu onemoguÄeno, i dalje bi bilo
+opasno. “UkljuÄivanje za stalno” u riskantne pothvate, gdje
+rizik ovisi o detaljima, stvara nemarnost. Da bi se zaštitila privatnost
+korisnika, sustav mora omoguÄiti da oprez i obazrivost pri upotrebi budu
+jednostavno dostižni: ako lokalni program za pretragu ima opciju za
+pretraživanje mreže, korisnik mora imati posebnu opciju da <em>svaki
+put</em> iskljuÄivo izabere mrežno pretraživanje ako to želi. To nije
teško
+napraviti. Potrebno je samo postaviti posebnu dugmad za mrežno i lokalno
+pretraživanje, kako je uostalom i bilo na prijašnjim verzijama
+Ubuntua. Mrežna pretraga bi takoÄer trebala informirati korisnika kome Å¡alje
+te osobne informacije i koje informacije Å¡alje. </p>
+
+<p>Ako veÄina vodeÄih mislilaca u naÅ¡oj zajednici vide ovo kao osobni
problem
+svakog korisnika, ako sami na svom sustavu iskljuÄe nadzor i nastave
+promovirati Ubuntu, Canonical bi se mogao izvuÄi s tom praksom. To bi
+naÄinilo veliku Å¡teta zajednici slobodnog softvera. </p>
+
+<p>Mi koji predstavljamo slobodni softver kao obranu od malwarea, ne kažemo da
+je ta obrana savršena. Ne postoji savršena obrana. Mi ne kažemo da je
+zajednica u stanju držati malware podalje <em>bez ijedne greške</em>, tako
+da primjer s Ubuntu-ovim Å¡pijunskim softverom ne znaÄi da moramo priznati da
+nismo u pravu.</p>
+
+<p>Ali ovdje je u igri nešto više od toga tko je u pravu a tko nije. U
pitanju
+je to može li naša zajednica pravilno koristiti argument o zlonamjernom
+vlasniÄkom softveru. Ako možemo reÄi samo da “vas slobodni softver
+neÄe Å¡pijunirati osim ako to nije Ubuntu,”, to ima puno manju snagu
+nego ako se kaže “slobodni vas softver neÄe uopÄe
Å¡pijunirati.”</p>
+
+<p>Na nama bi bilo da uÄinimo sve Å¡to je potrebno da se Canonical sprijeÄi u
+takvoj praksi. Bilo kakav izgovor Canonicala je neprihvatljiv. Äak i da
+iskoriste sav novac koji dobiju od Amazona za razvoj slobodnog softvera, to
+neÄe nadoknaditi ono Å¡to Äe slobodni softver izgubiti ako prestane nuditi
+dobar naÄin zaÅ¡tite korisnika od zlostavljanja. </p>
+
+<p>Ako budete preporuÄivali ili instalirali nekome GNU/Linux, molim vas da
+iskljuÄite Ubuntu sa popisa distribucija koje preporuÄujete. Ako vas dosad
+nije uvjerila praksa Ubuntua da instaliraju i preporuÄuju neslobodni
+softver, neka vam ovo bude pouka. Na vašim instal-feštama, na Danima
+slobodnog softvera itd., nemojte instalirati niti preporuÄivati
+Ubuntu. Umjesto toga, recite ljudima da Ubuntu treba izbjegavati zbog
+Å¡pijuniranja. </p>
+
+<p>I dok to radite, recite ljudima da Ubuntu sadrži i preporuÄuje druge
+neslobodne programe. (Pogledaj <a href="/distros/common-distros.html">
+http://www.gnu.org/distros/common-distros.html</a>.) To Äe biti protuteža
+drugom obliku negativnog utjecaja koji Ubuntu vrši u zajednici slobodnog
+softvera, a to je legitimiziranje neslobodnog softvera.</p>
+
+
+<div style="font-size: small;">
+
+<!--TRANSLATORS: Use space (SPC) as msgstr if you don't have notes.-->
+ </div>
+</div>
+
+<!-- for id="content", starts in the include above -->
+<!--#include virtual="/server/footer.hr.html" -->
+<div id="footer">
+
+<p>Molimo vas, opÄenite upite o FSF & GNU Å¡aljite na <a
+href="mailto:address@hidden";><address@hidden></a>. Postoje i <a
+href="/contact/">drugi naÄini kontaktiranja</a> FSF-a. Prekinute poveznice i
+ostale ispravke ili prijedloge možete poslati na <a
+href="mailto:address@hidden";><address@hidden></a>.</p>
+
+<p>
+<!-- TRANSLATORS: Ignore the original text in this paragraph,
+ replace it with the translation of these two:
+
+ We work hard and do our best to provide accurate, good quality
+ translations. However, we are not exempt from imperfection.
+ Please send your comments and general suggestions in this regard
+ to <a href="mailto:address@hidden";>
+
+ <address@hidden></a>.</p>
+
+ <p>For information on coordinating and submitting translations of
+ our web pages, see <a
+ href="/server/standards/README.translations.html">Translations
+ README</a>. -->
+Radimo naporno i dajemo sve od sebe kako bismo pružili toÄne, visoko
+kvalitetne prijevode. MeÄutim, nismo osloboÄeni od nesavrÅ¡enosti. Molimo
+vas, Å¡aljite svoje komentare i opÄenite prijedloge u tom smislu na <a
+href="mailto:address@hidden";><address@hidden></a>.
+Za informacije o koordiniranju i dostavljanju prijevoda naših mrežnih
+stranica, pogledajte <a
+href="/server/standards/README.translations.html">PROÄITAJME za
+prijevode</a>.</p>
+
+<!-- Regarding copyright, in general, standalone pages (as opposed to
+ files generated as part of manuals) on the GNU web server should
+ be under CC BY-ND 3.0 US. Please do NOT change or remove this
+ without talking with the webmasters or licensing team first.
+ Please make sure the copyright date is consistent with the
+ document. For web pages, it is ok to list just the latest year the
+ document was modified, or published.
+
+ If you wish to list earlier years, that is ok too.
+ Either "2001, 2002, 2003" or "2001-2003" are ok for specifying
+ years, as long as each year in the range is in fact a copyrightable
+ year, i.e., a year in which the document was published (including
+ being publicly visible on the web or in a revision control system).
+
+ There is more detail about copyright years in the GNU Maintainers
+ Information document, www.gnu.org/prep/maintain. -->
+<p>Copyright © 2012 Richard Stallman</p>
+
+<p>Ovo djelo dano je na korištenje pod <a rel="license"
+href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/3.0/us/deed.hr";>licencom
+Creative Commons Imenovanje-Bez prerada 3.0 SAD</a>.</p>
+
+<!--#include virtual="/server/bottom-notes.hr.html" -->
+<div class="translators-credits">
+
+<!--TRANSLATORS: Use space (SPC) as msgstr if you don't want credits.-->
+ Prijevod: JK, 2013.</div>
+
+
+ <p><!-- timestamp start -->
+Vrijeme zadnje izmjene:
+
+$Date: 2013/09/09 07:03:24 $
+
+<!-- timestamp end -->
+</p>
+</div>
+</div>
+</body>
+</html>
Index: po/ubuntu-spyware.hr-en.html
===================================================================
RCS file: po/ubuntu-spyware.hr-en.html
diff -N po/ubuntu-spyware.hr-en.html
--- /dev/null 1 Jan 1970 00:00:00 -0000
+++ po/ubuntu-spyware.hr-en.html 9 Sep 2013 07:03:25 -0000 1.1
@@ -0,0 +1,199 @@
+<!--#include virtual="/server/header.html" -->
+<!-- Parent-Version: 1.75 -->
+<title>Ubuntu Spyware: What to Do?
+ - GNU Project - Free Software Foundation</title>
+<!--#include virtual="/philosophy/po/ubuntu-spyware.translist" -->
+<!--#include virtual="/server/banner.html" -->
+<h2>Ubuntu Spyware: What to Do?</h2>
+
+<p>by <a href="http://www.stallman.org/";>Richard Stallman</a></p>
+
+<p>One of the major advantages of free software is that the community
+ protects users from malicious software. Now
+ Ubuntu <a href="/gnu/linux-and-gnu.html"> GNU/Linux </a> has become
+ a counterexample. What should we do?</p>
+
+<p>Proprietary software is associated with malicious treatment of the user:
+ surveillance code, digital handcuffs (DRM or Digital Restrictions
+ Management) to restrict users, and back doors that can do nasty things
+ under remote control. Programs that do any of these things are
+ malware and should be treated as such. Widely used examples include
+ Windows, the iThings, and the Amazon “Kindle” product for
virtual book
+ burning, which do all three; Macintosh and the Playstation III which
+ impose DRM; most portable phones, which do spying and have back doors;
+ Adobe Flash Player, which does spying and enforces DRM; and plenty of
+ apps for iThings and Android, which are guilty of one or more of these
+ nasty practices.</p>
+
+<p>Free software gives users a chance to protect themselves from
+ malicious software behaviors. Even better, usually the community
+ protects everyone, and most users don't have to move a muscle. Here's
+ how.</p>
+
+<p>Once in a while, users who know programming find that a free program
+ has malicious code. Generally the next thing they do is release a
+ corrected version of the program; with the four freedoms that define
+ free software (see <a
href="/philosophy/free-sw.html">http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/free-sw.html</a>),
they
+ are free to do this. This is called a “fork” of the program.
Soon
+ the community switches to the corrected fork, and the malicious
+ version is rejected. The prospect of ignominious rejection is not
+ very tempting; thus, most of the time, even those who are not stopped
+ by their consciences and social pressure refrain from putting
+ malfeatures in free software.</p>
+
+<p>But not always. Ubuntu, a widely used and
+ influential <a href="/gnu/linux-and-gnu.html"> GNU/Linux </a>
+ distribution, has installed surveillance code. When the user
+ searches her own local files for a string using the Ubuntu desktop,
+ Ubuntu sends that string to one of Canonical's servers. (Canonical
+ is the company that develops Ubuntu.)</p>
+
+<p>This is just like the first surveillance practice I learned about in
+ Windows. My late friend Fravia told me that when he searched for a
+ string in the files of his Windows system, it sent a packet to some
+ server, which was detected by his firewall. Given that first example
+ I paid attention and learned about the propensity of “reputable”
+ proprietary software to be malware. Perhaps it is no coincidence that
+ Ubuntu sends the same information.</p>
+
+<p>Ubuntu uses the information about searches to show the user ads to buy
+ various things from Amazon. Amazon commits many wrongs (see
+ <a
href="http://stallman.org/amazon.html";>http://stallman.org/amazon.html</a>); by
promoting Amazon, Canonical
+ contributes to them. However, the ads are not the core of the
+ problem. The main issue is the spying. Canonical says it does not
+ tell Amazon who searched for what. However, it is just as bad for
+ Canonical to collect your personal information as it would have been
+ for Amazon to collect it.</p>
+
+<p>People will certainly make a modified version of Ubuntu without this
+ surveillance. In fact, several GNU/Linux distros are modified
+ versions of Ubuntu. When those update to the latest Ubuntu as a base,
+ I expect they will remove this. Canonical surely expects that too.</p>
+
+<p>Most free software developers would abandon such a plan given the
+ prospect of a mass switch to someone else's corrected version. But
+ Canonical has not abandoned the Ubuntu spyware. Perhaps Canonical
+ figures that the name “Ubuntu” has so much momentum and
influence that
+ it can avoid the usual consequences and get away with surveillance.</p>
+
+<p>Canonical says this feature searches the Internet in other ways.
+ Depending on the details, that might or might not make the problem
+ bigger, but not smaller.</p>
+
+<p>Ubuntu allows users to switch the surveillance off. Clearly Canonical
+ thinks that many Ubuntu users will leave this setting in the default
+ state (on). And many may do so, because it doesn't occur to them to
+ try to do anything about it. Thus, the existence of that switch does
+ not make the surveillance feature ok.</p>
+
+<p>Even if it were disabled by default, the feature would still be
+ dangerous: “opt in, once and for all” for a risky practice,
where the
+ risk varies depending on details, invites carelessness. To protect
+ users' privacy, systems should make prudence easy: when a local search
+ program has a network search feature, it should be up to the user to
+ choose network search explicitly <em>each time</em>. This is easy:
+ all it takes is to have separate buttons for network searches and
+ local searches, as earlier versions of Ubuntu did. A network search
+ feature should also inform the user clearly and concretely about who
+ will get what personal information of hers, if and when she uses the
+ feature.</p>
+
+<p>If a sufficient part of our community's opinion leaders view this
+ issue in personal terms only, if they switch the surveillance off for
+ themselves and continue to promote Ubuntu, Canonical might get away
+ with it. That would be a great loss to the free software community.</p>
+
+<p>We who present free software as a defense against malware do not say
+ it is a perfect defense. No perfect defense is known. We don't say
+ the community will deter malware <em>without fail</em>. Thus,
+ strictly speaking, the Ubuntu spyware example doesn't mean we have to
+ eat our words.</p>
+
+<p>But there's more at stake here than whether some of us have to eat
+ some words. What's at stake is whether our community can effectively
+ use the argument based on proprietary spyware. If we can only say,
+ “free software won't spy on you, unless it's Ubuntu,” that's
much less
+ powerful than saying, “free software won't spy on you.”</p>
+
+<p>It behooves us to give Canonical whatever rebuff is needed to make it
+ stop this. Any excuse Canonical offers is inadequate; even if it used
+ all the money it gets from Amazon to develop free software, that can
+ hardly overcome what free software will lose if it ceases to offer an
+ effective way to avoid abuse of the users.</p>
+
+<p>If you ever recommend or redistribute GNU/Linux, please remove Ubuntu
+ from the distros you recommend or redistribute. If its practice of
+ installing and recommending nonfree software didn't convince you to
+ stop, let this convince you. In your install fests, in your Software
+ Freedom Day events, in your FLISOL events, don't install or recommend
+ Ubuntu. Instead, tell people that Ubuntu is shunned for spying.</p>
+
+<p>While you're at it, you can also tell them that Ubuntu contains
+ nonfree programs and suggests other nonfree programs. (See
+ <a href="/distros/common-distros.html">
+ http://www.gnu.org/distros/common-distros.html</a>.) That will counteract
+ the other form of negative influence that Ubuntu exerts in the free
+ software community: legitimizing nonfree software.</p>
+
+</div><!-- for id="content", starts in the include above -->
+<!--#include virtual="/server/footer.html" -->
+<div id="footer">
+
+<p>Please send general FSF & GNU inquiries to
+<a href="mailto:address@hidden";><address@hidden></a>.
+There are also <a href="/contact/">other ways to contact</a>
+the FSF. Broken links and other corrections or suggestions can be sent
+to <a href="mailto:address@hidden";><address@hidden></a>.</p>
+
+<p><!-- TRANSLATORS: Ignore the original text in this paragraph,
+ replace it with the translation of these two:
+
+ We work hard and do our best to provide accurate, good quality
+ translations. However, we are not exempt from imperfection.
+ Please send your comments and general suggestions in this regard
+ to <a href="mailto:address@hidden";>
+ <address@hidden></a>.</p>
+
+ <p>For information on coordinating and submitting translations of
+ our web pages, see <a
+ href="/server/standards/README.translations.html">Translations
+ README</a>. -->
+Please see the <a
+href="/server/standards/README.translations.html">Translations
+README</a> for information on coordinating and submitting translations
+of this article.</p>
+
+<!-- Regarding copyright, in general, standalone pages (as opposed to
+ files generated as part of manuals) on the GNU web server should
+ be under CC BY-ND 3.0 US. Please do NOT change or remove this
+ without talking with the webmasters or licensing team first.
+ Please make sure the copyright date is consistent with the
+ document. For web pages, it is ok to list just the latest year the
+ document was modified, or published.
+
+ If you wish to list earlier years, that is ok too.
+ Either "2001, 2002, 2003" or "2001-2003" are ok for specifying
+ years, as long as each year in the range is in fact a copyrightable
+ year, i.e., a year in which the document was published (including
+ being publicly visible on the web or in a revision control system).
+
+ There is more detail about copyright years in the GNU Maintainers
+ Information document, www.gnu.org/prep/maintain. -->
+
+<p>Copyright © 2012 Richard Stallman</p>
+
+<p>This page is licensed under a <a rel="license"
+href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/3.0/us/";>Creative
+Commons Attribution-NoDerivs 3.0 United States License</a>.</p>
+
+<!--#include virtual="/server/bottom-notes.html" -->
+
+<p>Updated:
+<!-- timestamp start -->
+$Date: 2013/09/09 07:03:25 $
+<!-- timestamp end -->
+</p>
+</div>
+</div>
+</body>
+</html>
| [Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread] |
- www/philosophy po/ubuntu-spyware.hr.po po/ubunt...,
GNUN <=