[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
www/philosophy latest-articles.html
From: |
Pavel Kharitonov |
Subject: |
www/philosophy latest-articles.html |
Date: |
Sun, 01 Sep 2013 05:49:23 +0000 |
CVSROOT: /web/www
Module name: www
Changes by: Pavel Kharitonov <ineiev> 13/09/01 05:49:23
Modified files:
philosophy : latest-articles.html
Log message:
Link to /p/proprietary.html; update boilerplate to v1.75
CVSWeb URLs:
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/latest-articles.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.25&r2=1.26
Patches:
Index: latest-articles.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/latest-articles.html,v
retrieving revision 1.25
retrieving revision 1.26
diff -u -b -r1.25 -r1.26
--- latest-articles.html 30 Jul 2013 06:20:25 -0000 1.25
+++ latest-articles.html 1 Sep 2013 05:49:23 -0000 1.26
@@ -1,6 +1,7 @@
<!--#include virtual="/server/header.html" -->
-
-<title>Philosophy of the GNU Project - Latest Articles - GNU Project - Free
Software Foundation (FSF)</title>
+<!-- Parent-Version: 1.75 -->
+<title>Latest Articles
+- GNU Project - Free Software Foundation</title>
<!--#include virtual="/philosophy/po/latest-articles.translist" -->
<!--#include virtual="/server/banner.html" -->
@@ -15,8 +16,8 @@
<p>Hot off the presses, here are the latest published articles on free
software and the GNU project.</p>
<ul>
+<li><a href="/philosophy/proprietary.html">Proprietary Software</a></li>
<li><a href="/philosophy/is-ever-good-use-nonfree-program.html">Is It Ever a
Good Thing to Use a Nonfree Program?</a></li>
-<li><a href="/philosophy/proprietary-sabotage.html">Proprietary
Sabotage</a></li>
<li><a href="/philosophy/funding-art-vs-funding-software.html">Funding Art vs
Funding Software</a></li>
<li><a href="/philosophy/ubuntu-spyware.html">Ubuntu Spyware: What to
Do?</a></li>
<li><a href="/philosophy/when_free_software_isnt_practically_better.html">When
Free Software Isn't (Practically) Better</a></li>
@@ -57,50 +58,68 @@
Exceptions to the GNU GPL</a></li>
</ul>
-</div>
-
+</div><!-- for id="content", starts in the include above -->
<!--#include virtual="/server/footer.html" -->
-
<div id="footer">
-<p>
-Please send FSF & GNU inquiries to
+
+<p>Please send general FSF & GNU inquiries to
<a href="mailto:address@hidden"><address@hidden></a>.
There are also <a href="/contact/">other ways to contact</a>
-the FSF.
-<br />
-Please send broken links and other corrections or suggestions to
-<a href="mailto:address@hidden"><address@hidden></a>.
-</p>
+the FSF. Broken links and other corrections or suggestions can be sent
+to <a href="mailto:address@hidden"><address@hidden></a>.</p>
-<p>
-Please see the
-<a href="/server/standards/README.translations.html">Translations
-README</a> for information on coordinating and submitting
-translations of this article.
-</p>
+<p><!-- TRANSLATORS: Ignore the original text in this paragraph,
+ replace it with the translation of these two:
+
+ We work hard and do our best to provide accurate, good quality
+ translations. However, we are not exempt from imperfection.
+ Please send your comments and general suggestions in this regard
+ to <a href="mailto:address@hidden">
+ <address@hidden></a>.</p>
+
+ <p>For information on coordinating and submitting translations of
+ our web pages, see <a
+ href="/server/standards/README.translations.html">Translations
+ README</a>. -->
+Please see the <a
+href="/server/standards/README.translations.html">Translations
+README</a> for information on coordinating and submitting translations
+of this article.</p>
+
+<!-- Regarding copyright, in general, standalone pages (as opposed to
+ files generated as part of manuals) on the GNU web server should
+ be under CC BY-ND 3.0 US. Please do NOT change or remove this
+ without talking with the webmasters or licensing team first.
+ Please make sure the copyright date is consistent with the
+ document. For web pages, it is ok to list just the latest year the
+ document was modified, or published.
+
+ If you wish to list earlier years, that is ok too.
+ Either "2001, 2002, 2003" or "2001-2003" are ok for specifying
+ years, as long as each year in the range is in fact a copyrightable
+ year, i.e., a year in which the document was published (including
+ being publicly visible on the web or in a revision control system).
+
+ There is more detail about copyright years in the GNU Maintainers
+ Information document, www.gnu.org/prep/maintain. -->
<p>
Copyright © 1996, 1997, 1998, 1999, 2000, 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004,
-2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010 Free Software Foundation, Inc.</p>
+2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2013
+Free Software Foundation, Inc.</p>
+
<p>This page is licensed under a <a rel="license"
href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/3.0/us/">Creative
-Commons Attribution-NoDerivs 3.0 United States License</a>.
-</p>
+Commons Attribution-NoDerivs 3.0 United States License</a>.</p>
<!--#include virtual="/server/bottom-notes.html" -->
<p>Updated:
<!-- timestamp start -->
-$Date: 2013/07/30 06:20:25 $
+$Date: 2013/09/01 05:49:23 $
<!-- timestamp end -->
</p>
</div>
-<!-- All pages on the GNU web server should have the section about -->
-<!-- verbatim copying. Please do NOT remove this without talking -->
-<!-- with the webmasters first. -->
-<!-- Please make sure the copyright date is consistent with the document -->
-<!-- and that it is like this "2001, 2002" not this "2001-2002." -->
-
</div>
</body>
</html>
[Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread] |
- www/philosophy latest-articles.html,
Pavel Kharitonov <=