[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
www/philosophy po/limit-patent-effect.translist...
|
From: |
GNUN |
|
Subject: |
www/philosophy po/limit-patent-effect.translist... |
|
Date: |
Wed, 05 Jun 2013 17:28:32 +0000 |
CVSROOT: /web/www
Module name: www
Changes by: GNUN <gnun> 13/06/05 17:28:31
Modified files:
philosophy/po : limit-patent-effect.translist
microsoft-verdict.ca.po microsoft-verdict.fr.po
microsoft-verdict.it.po microsoft-verdict.ko.po
microsoft-verdict.nl.po microsoft-verdict.pl.po
microsoft-verdict.pot microsoft-verdict.ru.po
Added files:
philosophy : limit-patent-effect.ru.html
philosophy/po : limit-patent-effect.ru-en.html
Log message:
Automatic update by GNUnited Nations.
CVSWeb URLs:
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/limit-patent-effect.ru.html?cvsroot=www&rev=1.1
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/po/limit-patent-effect.translist?cvsroot=www&r1=1.7&r2=1.8
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/po/microsoft-verdict.ca.po?cvsroot=www&r1=1.13&r2=1.14
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/po/microsoft-verdict.fr.po?cvsroot=www&r1=1.26&r2=1.27
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/po/microsoft-verdict.it.po?cvsroot=www&r1=1.8&r2=1.9
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/po/microsoft-verdict.ko.po?cvsroot=www&r1=1.16&r2=1.17
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/po/microsoft-verdict.nl.po?cvsroot=www&r1=1.3&r2=1.4
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/po/microsoft-verdict.pl.po?cvsroot=www&r1=1.15&r2=1.16
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/po/microsoft-verdict.pot?cvsroot=www&r1=1.11&r2=1.12
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/po/microsoft-verdict.ru.po?cvsroot=www&r1=1.14&r2=1.15
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/po/limit-patent-effect.ru-en.html?cvsroot=www&rev=1.1
Patches:
Index: po/limit-patent-effect.translist
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/po/limit-patent-effect.translist,v
retrieving revision 1.7
retrieving revision 1.8
diff -u -b -r1.7 -r1.8
--- po/limit-patent-effect.translist 16 Mar 2013 08:30:11 -0000 1.7
+++ po/limit-patent-effect.translist 5 Jun 2013 17:28:30 -0000 1.8
@@ -4,6 +4,7 @@
<p>
<span dir="ltr" class="original"><a lang="en" hreflang="en"
href="/philosophy/limit-patent-effect.en.html">English</a> [en]</span>
<span dir="ltr"><a lang="fr" hreflang="fr"
href="/philosophy/limit-patent-effect.fr.html">français</a> [fr]</span>
+<span dir="ltr"><a lang="ru" hreflang="ru"
href="/philosophy/limit-patent-effect.ru.html">ÑÑÑÑкий</a> [ru]</span>
</p>
</div>' -->
<!--#if expr="$HTML_BODY = yes" -->
Index: po/microsoft-verdict.ca.po
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/po/microsoft-verdict.ca.po,v
retrieving revision 1.13
retrieving revision 1.14
diff -u -b -r1.13 -r1.14
--- po/microsoft-verdict.ca.po 15 May 2013 19:29:02 -0000 1.13
+++ po/microsoft-verdict.ca.po 5 Jun 2013 17:28:30 -0000 1.14
@@ -7,7 +7,7 @@
msgstr ""
"Project-Id-Version: microsoft-verdict.ca\n"
"Report-Msgid-Bugs-To: \n"
-"POT-Creation-Date: 2013-05-15 19:25+0000\n"
+"POT-Creation-Date: 2013-06-05 17:25+0000\n"
"PO-Revision-Date: 2011-07-25 13:17+0200\n"
"Last-Translator: Miquel Puigpelat <address@hidden>\n"
"Language-Team: Catalan <address@hidden>\n"
@@ -34,10 +34,19 @@
# type: Content of: <p>
#. type: Content of: <p>
+#, fuzzy
+#| msgid ""
+#| "Many <a href=\"/gnu/linux-and-gnu.html\">GNU/Linux</a> users think of the "
+#| "system as competition for Microsoft. But the Free Software Movement aims "
+#| "to solve a problem that is much bigger than Microsoft: proprietary, non-"
+#| "free software, designed to keep users helpless and prohibit cooperation. "
+#| "Microsoft is the largest developer of such software, but many other "
+#| "companies treat the users' freedom just as badly; if they have not "
+#| "shackled as many users as Microsoft, it is not for lack of trying."
msgid ""
"Many <a href=\"/gnu/linux-and-gnu.html\">GNU/Linux</a> users think of the "
"system as competition for Microsoft. But the Free Software Movement aims to "
-"solve a problem that is much bigger than Microsoft: proprietary, non-free "
+"solve a problem that is much bigger than Microsoft: proprietary, nonfree "
"software, designed to keep users helpless and prohibit cooperation. "
"Microsoft is the largest developer of such software, but many other "
"companies treat the users' freedom just as badly; if they have not shackled "
@@ -68,9 +77,21 @@
# type: Content of: <p>
#. type: Content of: <p>
+#, fuzzy
+#| msgid ""
+#| "If the remedies are designed to enable other companies compete in "
+#| "offering proprietary, non-free software, that will do the Free World no "
+#| "particular good. Alternative possible masters is not freedom. And "
+#| "competition could lead them to do a “better” job, better in a "
+#| "narrow technical sense; then it could be harder for us to “"
+#| "compete” with them technically. We will continue to offer the user "
+#| "one thing those companies do not—freedom—and users who value "
+#| "freedom will continue to choose free software for that reason. But users "
+#| "who do not value freedom, and choose a system based on mere convenience, "
+#| "might be enticed away to “improved” proprietary systems."
msgid ""
"If the remedies are designed to enable other companies compete in offering "
-"proprietary, non-free software, that will do the Free World no particular "
+"proprietary, nonfree software, that will do the Free World no particular "
"good. Alternative possible masters is not freedom. And competition could "
"lead them to do a “better” job, better in a narrow technical "
"sense; then it could be harder for us to “compete” with them "
Index: po/microsoft-verdict.fr.po
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/po/microsoft-verdict.fr.po,v
retrieving revision 1.26
retrieving revision 1.27
diff -u -b -r1.26 -r1.27
--- po/microsoft-verdict.fr.po 21 May 2013 21:25:50 -0000 1.26
+++ po/microsoft-verdict.fr.po 5 Jun 2013 17:28:30 -0000 1.27
@@ -7,7 +7,7 @@
msgid ""
msgstr ""
"Project-Id-Version: microsoft-verdict.html\n"
-"POT-Creation-Date: 2013-05-15 19:25+0000\n"
+"POT-Creation-Date: 2013-06-05 17:25+0000\n"
"PO-Revision-Date: 2013-05-18 19:58+0200\n"
"Last-Translator: Thérèse Godefroy <godef.th AT free.fr>\n"
"Language-Team: French <address@hidden>\n"
@@ -15,6 +15,7 @@
"MIME-Version: 1.0\n"
"Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8\n"
"Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit\n"
+"Outdated-Since: 2013-06-05 17:25+0000\n"
#. type: Content of: <title>
msgid "On the Microsoft Verdict - GNU Project - Free Software Foundation"
@@ -25,10 +26,26 @@
msgstr "Ã propos du verdict Microsoft"
#. type: Content of: <p>
+# | Many <a href=\"/gnu/linux-and-gnu.html\">GNU/Linux</a> users think of the
+# | system as competition for Microsoft. But the Free Software Movement aims
+# | to solve a problem that is much bigger than Microsoft: proprietary,
+# | non[---]free software, designed to keep users helpless and prohibit
+# | cooperation. Microsoft is the largest developer of such software, but
+# | many other companies treat the users' freedom just as badly; if they have
+# | not shackled as many users as Microsoft, it is not for lack of trying.
+#, fuzzy
+#| msgid ""
+#| "Many <a href=\"/gnu/linux-and-gnu.html\">GNU/Linux</a> users think of the "
+#| "system as competition for Microsoft. But the Free Software Movement aims "
+#| "to solve a problem that is much bigger than Microsoft: proprietary, non-"
+#| "free software, designed to keep users helpless and prohibit cooperation. "
+#| "Microsoft is the largest developer of such software, but many other "
+#| "companies treat the users' freedom just as badly; if they have not "
+#| "shackled as many users as Microsoft, it is not for lack of trying."
msgid ""
"Many <a href=\"/gnu/linux-and-gnu.html\">GNU/Linux</a> users think of the "
"system as competition for Microsoft. But the Free Software Movement aims to "
-"solve a problem that is much bigger than Microsoft: proprietary, non-free "
+"solve a problem that is much bigger than Microsoft: proprietary, nonfree "
"software, designed to keep users helpless and prohibit cooperation. "
"Microsoft is the largest developer of such software, but many other "
"companies treat the users' freedom just as badly; if they have not shackled "
@@ -58,9 +75,32 @@
"par le juge."
#. type: Content of: <p>
+# | If the remedies are designed to enable other companies compete in offering
+# | proprietary, non[---]free software, that will do the Free World no
+# | particular good. Alternative possible masters is not freedom. And
+# | competition could lead them to do a “better” job, better in a
+# | narrow technical sense; then it could be harder for us to
+# | “compete” with them technically. We will continue to offer
+# | the user one thing those companies do not—freedom—and users
+# | who value freedom will continue to choose free software for that reason.
+# | But users who do not value freedom, and choose a system based on mere
+# | convenience, might be enticed away to “improved” proprietary
+# | systems.
+#, fuzzy
+#| msgid ""
+#| "If the remedies are designed to enable other companies compete in "
+#| "offering proprietary, non-free software, that will do the Free World no "
+#| "particular good. Alternative possible masters is not freedom. And "
+#| "competition could lead them to do a “better” job, better in a "
+#| "narrow technical sense; then it could be harder for us to “"
+#| "compete” with them technically. We will continue to offer the user "
+#| "one thing those companies do not—freedom—and users who value "
+#| "freedom will continue to choose free software for that reason. But users "
+#| "who do not value freedom, and choose a system based on mere convenience, "
+#| "might be enticed away to “improved” proprietary systems."
msgid ""
"If the remedies are designed to enable other companies compete in offering "
-"proprietary, non-free software, that will do the Free World no particular "
+"proprietary, nonfree software, that will do the Free World no particular "
"good. Alternative possible masters is not freedom. And competition could "
"lead them to do a “better” job, better in a narrow technical "
"sense; then it could be harder for us to “compete” with them "
Index: po/microsoft-verdict.it.po
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/po/microsoft-verdict.it.po,v
retrieving revision 1.8
retrieving revision 1.9
diff -u -b -r1.8 -r1.9
--- po/microsoft-verdict.it.po 15 May 2013 21:28:39 -0000 1.8
+++ po/microsoft-verdict.it.po 5 Jun 2013 17:28:30 -0000 1.9
@@ -7,7 +7,7 @@
msgid ""
msgstr ""
"Project-Id-Version: microsoft-verdict.html\n"
-"POT-Creation-Date: 2013-05-15 19:25+0000\n"
+"POT-Creation-Date: 2013-06-05 17:25+0000\n"
"PO-Revision-Date: 2013-05-15 23:15+0100\n"
"Last-Translator: Andrea Pescetti <address@hidden>\n"
"Language-Team: Italian\n"
@@ -15,6 +15,7 @@
"MIME-Version: 1.0\n"
"Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8\n"
"Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit\n"
+"Outdated-Since: 2013-06-05 17:25+0000\n"
#. type: Content of: <title>
msgid "On the Microsoft Verdict - GNU Project - Free Software Foundation"
@@ -27,10 +28,26 @@
msgstr "A proposito della sentenza Microsoft"
#. type: Content of: <p>
+# | Many <a href=\"/gnu/linux-and-gnu.html\">GNU/Linux</a> users think of the
+# | system as competition for Microsoft. But the Free Software Movement aims
+# | to solve a problem that is much bigger than Microsoft: proprietary,
+# | non[---]free software, designed to keep users helpless and prohibit
+# | cooperation. Microsoft is the largest developer of such software, but
+# | many other companies treat the users' freedom just as badly; if they have
+# | not shackled as many users as Microsoft, it is not for lack of trying.
+#, fuzzy
+#| msgid ""
+#| "Many <a href=\"/gnu/linux-and-gnu.html\">GNU/Linux</a> users think of the "
+#| "system as competition for Microsoft. But the Free Software Movement aims "
+#| "to solve a problem that is much bigger than Microsoft: proprietary, non-"
+#| "free software, designed to keep users helpless and prohibit cooperation. "
+#| "Microsoft is the largest developer of such software, but many other "
+#| "companies treat the users' freedom just as badly; if they have not "
+#| "shackled as many users as Microsoft, it is not for lack of trying."
msgid ""
"Many <a href=\"/gnu/linux-and-gnu.html\">GNU/Linux</a> users think of the "
"system as competition for Microsoft. But the Free Software Movement aims to "
-"solve a problem that is much bigger than Microsoft: proprietary, non-free "
+"solve a problem that is much bigger than Microsoft: proprietary, nonfree "
"software, designed to keep users helpless and prohibit cooperation. "
"Microsoft is the largest developer of such software, but many other "
"companies treat the users' freedom just as badly; if they have not shackled "
@@ -59,9 +76,32 @@
"libertà degli utenti."
#. type: Content of: <p>
+# | If the remedies are designed to enable other companies compete in offering
+# | proprietary, non[---]free software, that will do the Free World no
+# | particular good. Alternative possible masters is not freedom. And
+# | competition could lead them to do a “better” job, better in a
+# | narrow technical sense; then it could be harder for us to
+# | “compete” with them technically. We will continue to offer
+# | the user one thing those companies do not—freedom—and users
+# | who value freedom will continue to choose free software for that reason.
+# | But users who do not value freedom, and choose a system based on mere
+# | convenience, might be enticed away to “improved” proprietary
+# | systems.
+#, fuzzy
+#| msgid ""
+#| "If the remedies are designed to enable other companies compete in "
+#| "offering proprietary, non-free software, that will do the Free World no "
+#| "particular good. Alternative possible masters is not freedom. And "
+#| "competition could lead them to do a “better” job, better in a "
+#| "narrow technical sense; then it could be harder for us to “"
+#| "compete” with them technically. We will continue to offer the user "
+#| "one thing those companies do not—freedom—and users who value "
+#| "freedom will continue to choose free software for that reason. But users "
+#| "who do not value freedom, and choose a system based on mere convenience, "
+#| "might be enticed away to “improved” proprietary systems."
msgid ""
"If the remedies are designed to enable other companies compete in offering "
-"proprietary, non-free software, that will do the Free World no particular "
+"proprietary, nonfree software, that will do the Free World no particular "
"good. Alternative possible masters is not freedom. And competition could "
"lead them to do a “better” job, better in a narrow technical "
"sense; then it could be harder for us to “compete” with them "
Index: po/microsoft-verdict.ko.po
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/po/microsoft-verdict.ko.po,v
retrieving revision 1.16
retrieving revision 1.17
diff -u -b -r1.16 -r1.17
--- po/microsoft-verdict.ko.po 15 May 2013 19:29:02 -0000 1.16
+++ po/microsoft-verdict.ko.po 5 Jun 2013 17:28:30 -0000 1.17
@@ -8,7 +8,7 @@
msgid ""
msgstr ""
"Project-Id-Version: microsoft-verdict.html\n"
-"POT-Creation-Date: 2013-05-15 19:25+0000\n"
+"POT-Creation-Date: 2013-06-05 17:25+0000\n"
"PO-Revision-Date: 2012-03-19 09:15+0900\n"
"Last-Translator: Chang-hun Song <address@hidden>\n"
"Language-Team: Korean <address@hidden>\n"
@@ -32,10 +32,19 @@
msgstr "ë§ì´í¬ë¡ìíí¸ì ëí íê²°ì ëí´ì"
#. type: Content of: <p>
+#, fuzzy
+#| msgid ""
+#| "Many <a href=\"/gnu/linux-and-gnu.html\">GNU/Linux</a> users think of the "
+#| "system as competition for Microsoft. But the Free Software Movement aims "
+#| "to solve a problem that is much bigger than Microsoft: proprietary, non-"
+#| "free software, designed to keep users helpless and prohibit cooperation. "
+#| "Microsoft is the largest developer of such software, but many other "
+#| "companies treat the users' freedom just as badly; if they have not "
+#| "shackled as many users as Microsoft, it is not for lack of trying."
msgid ""
"Many <a href=\"/gnu/linux-and-gnu.html\">GNU/Linux</a> users think of the "
"system as competition for Microsoft. But the Free Software Movement aims to "
-"solve a problem that is much bigger than Microsoft: proprietary, non-free "
+"solve a problem that is much bigger than Microsoft: proprietary, nonfree "
"software, designed to keep users helpless and prohibit cooperation. "
"Microsoft is the largest developer of such software, but many other "
"companies treat the users' freedom just as badly; if they have not shackled "
@@ -65,9 +74,21 @@
"ë¬ë ¤ ììµëë¤."
#. type: Content of: <p>
+#, fuzzy
+#| msgid ""
+#| "If the remedies are designed to enable other companies compete in "
+#| "offering proprietary, non-free software, that will do the Free World no "
+#| "particular good. Alternative possible masters is not freedom. And "
+#| "competition could lead them to do a “better” job, better in a "
+#| "narrow technical sense; then it could be harder for us to “"
+#| "compete” with them technically. We will continue to offer the user "
+#| "one thing those companies do not—freedom—and users who value "
+#| "freedom will continue to choose free software for that reason. But users "
+#| "who do not value freedom, and choose a system based on mere convenience, "
+#| "might be enticed away to “improved” proprietary systems."
msgid ""
"If the remedies are designed to enable other companies compete in offering "
-"proprietary, non-free software, that will do the Free World no particular "
+"proprietary, nonfree software, that will do the Free World no particular "
"good. Alternative possible masters is not freedom. And competition could "
"lead them to do a “better” job, better in a narrow technical "
"sense; then it could be harder for us to “compete” with them "
Index: po/microsoft-verdict.nl.po
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/po/microsoft-verdict.nl.po,v
retrieving revision 1.3
retrieving revision 1.4
diff -u -b -r1.3 -r1.4
--- po/microsoft-verdict.nl.po 15 May 2013 19:29:02 -0000 1.3
+++ po/microsoft-verdict.nl.po 5 Jun 2013 17:28:31 -0000 1.4
@@ -6,7 +6,7 @@
msgid ""
msgstr ""
"Project-Id-Version: \n"
-"POT-Creation-Date: 2013-05-15 19:25+0000\n"
+"POT-Creation-Date: 2013-06-05 17:25+0000\n"
"PO-Revision-Date: \n"
"Last-Translator: Tom Uijldert <address@hidden>\n"
"Language-Team: \n"
@@ -31,10 +31,26 @@
msgstr "Over de Veroordeling van Microsoft"
#. type: Content of: <p>
+# | Many <a href=\"/gnu/linux-and-gnu.html\">GNU/Linux</a> users think of the
+# | system as competition for Microsoft. But the Free Software Movement aims
+# | to solve a problem that is much bigger than Microsoft: proprietary,
+# | non[---]free software, designed to keep users helpless and prohibit
+# | cooperation. Microsoft is the largest developer of such software, but
+# | many other companies treat the users' freedom just as badly; if they have
+# | not shackled as many users as Microsoft, it is not for lack of trying.
+#, fuzzy
+#| msgid ""
+#| "Many <a href=\"/gnu/linux-and-gnu.html\">GNU/Linux</a> users think of the "
+#| "system as competition for Microsoft. But the Free Software Movement aims "
+#| "to solve a problem that is much bigger than Microsoft: proprietary, non-"
+#| "free software, designed to keep users helpless and prohibit cooperation. "
+#| "Microsoft is the largest developer of such software, but many other "
+#| "companies treat the users' freedom just as badly; if they have not "
+#| "shackled as many users as Microsoft, it is not for lack of trying."
msgid ""
"Many <a href=\"/gnu/linux-and-gnu.html\">GNU/Linux</a> users think of the "
"system as competition for Microsoft. But the Free Software Movement aims to "
-"solve a problem that is much bigger than Microsoft: proprietary, non-free "
+"solve a problem that is much bigger than Microsoft: proprietary, nonfree "
"software, designed to keep users helpless and prohibit cooperation. "
"Microsoft is the largest developer of such software, but many other "
"companies treat the users' freedom just as badly; if they have not shackled "
@@ -64,9 +80,32 @@
"de rechter zal nemen."
#. type: Content of: <p>
+# | If the remedies are designed to enable other companies compete in offering
+# | proprietary, non[---]free software, that will do the Free World no
+# | particular good. Alternative possible masters is not freedom. And
+# | competition could lead them to do a “better” job, better in a
+# | narrow technical sense; then it could be harder for us to
+# | “compete” with them technically. We will continue to offer
+# | the user one thing those companies do not—freedom—and users
+# | who value freedom will continue to choose free software for that reason.
+# | But users who do not value freedom, and choose a system based on mere
+# | convenience, might be enticed away to “improved” proprietary
+# | systems.
+#, fuzzy
+#| msgid ""
+#| "If the remedies are designed to enable other companies compete in "
+#| "offering proprietary, non-free software, that will do the Free World no "
+#| "particular good. Alternative possible masters is not freedom. And "
+#| "competition could lead them to do a “better” job, better in a "
+#| "narrow technical sense; then it could be harder for us to “"
+#| "compete” with them technically. We will continue to offer the user "
+#| "one thing those companies do not—freedom—and users who value "
+#| "freedom will continue to choose free software for that reason. But users "
+#| "who do not value freedom, and choose a system based on mere convenience, "
+#| "might be enticed away to “improved” proprietary systems."
msgid ""
"If the remedies are designed to enable other companies compete in offering "
-"proprietary, non-free software, that will do the Free World no particular "
+"proprietary, nonfree software, that will do the Free World no particular "
"good. Alternative possible masters is not freedom. And competition could "
"lead them to do a “better” job, better in a narrow technical "
"sense; then it could be harder for us to “compete” with them "
Index: po/microsoft-verdict.pl.po
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/po/microsoft-verdict.pl.po,v
retrieving revision 1.15
retrieving revision 1.16
diff -u -b -r1.15 -r1.16
--- po/microsoft-verdict.pl.po 18 May 2013 22:11:27 -0000 1.15
+++ po/microsoft-verdict.pl.po 5 Jun 2013 17:28:31 -0000 1.16
@@ -9,7 +9,7 @@
msgid ""
msgstr ""
"Project-Id-Version: philosophy/microsoft-verdict.html\n"
-"POT-Creation-Date: 2013-05-15 19:25+0000\n"
+"POT-Creation-Date: 2013-06-05 17:25+0000\n"
"PO-Revision-Date: 2013-05-18 16:01-0600\n"
"Last-Translator: Jan Owoc <jsowoc AT gmail.com>\n"
"Language-Team: Polish <address@hidden>\n"
@@ -17,6 +17,7 @@
"MIME-Version: 1.0\n"
"Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8\n"
"Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit\n"
+"Outdated-Since: 2013-06-05 17:25+0000\n"
"Plural-Forms: nplurals=3; plural=(n==1 ? 0 : n%10>=2 && n%10<=4 && (n%100<10 "
"|| n%100>=20) ? 1 : 2);\n"
"X-Generator: Virtaal 0.7.0\n"
@@ -34,10 +35,26 @@
# type: Content of: <p>
#. type: Content of: <p>
+# | Many <a href=\"/gnu/linux-and-gnu.html\">GNU/Linux</a> users think of the
+# | system as competition for Microsoft. But the Free Software Movement aims
+# | to solve a problem that is much bigger than Microsoft: proprietary,
+# | non[---]free software, designed to keep users helpless and prohibit
+# | cooperation. Microsoft is the largest developer of such software, but
+# | many other companies treat the users' freedom just as badly; if they have
+# | not shackled as many users as Microsoft, it is not for lack of trying.
+#, fuzzy
+#| msgid ""
+#| "Many <a href=\"/gnu/linux-and-gnu.html\">GNU/Linux</a> users think of the "
+#| "system as competition for Microsoft. But the Free Software Movement aims "
+#| "to solve a problem that is much bigger than Microsoft: proprietary, non-"
+#| "free software, designed to keep users helpless and prohibit cooperation. "
+#| "Microsoft is the largest developer of such software, but many other "
+#| "companies treat the users' freedom just as badly; if they have not "
+#| "shackled as many users as Microsoft, it is not for lack of trying."
msgid ""
"Many <a href=\"/gnu/linux-and-gnu.html\">GNU/Linux</a> users think of the "
"system as competition for Microsoft. But the Free Software Movement aims to "
-"solve a problem that is much bigger than Microsoft: proprietary, non-free "
+"solve a problem that is much bigger than Microsoft: proprietary, nonfree "
"software, designed to keep users helpless and prohibit cooperation. "
"Microsoft is the largest developer of such software, but many other "
"companies treat the users' freedom just as badly; if they have not shackled "
@@ -70,9 +87,32 @@
# type: Content of: <p>
#. type: Content of: <p>
+# | If the remedies are designed to enable other companies compete in offering
+# | proprietary, non[---]free software, that will do the Free World no
+# | particular good. Alternative possible masters is not freedom. And
+# | competition could lead them to do a “better” job, better in a
+# | narrow technical sense; then it could be harder for us to
+# | “compete” with them technically. We will continue to offer
+# | the user one thing those companies do not—freedom—and users
+# | who value freedom will continue to choose free software for that reason.
+# | But users who do not value freedom, and choose a system based on mere
+# | convenience, might be enticed away to “improved” proprietary
+# | systems.
+#, fuzzy
+#| msgid ""
+#| "If the remedies are designed to enable other companies compete in "
+#| "offering proprietary, non-free software, that will do the Free World no "
+#| "particular good. Alternative possible masters is not freedom. And "
+#| "competition could lead them to do a “better” job, better in a "
+#| "narrow technical sense; then it could be harder for us to “"
+#| "compete” with them technically. We will continue to offer the user "
+#| "one thing those companies do not—freedom—and users who value "
+#| "freedom will continue to choose free software for that reason. But users "
+#| "who do not value freedom, and choose a system based on mere convenience, "
+#| "might be enticed away to “improved” proprietary systems."
msgid ""
"If the remedies are designed to enable other companies compete in offering "
-"proprietary, non-free software, that will do the Free World no particular "
+"proprietary, nonfree software, that will do the Free World no particular "
"good. Alternative possible masters is not freedom. And competition could "
"lead them to do a “better” job, better in a narrow technical "
"sense; then it could be harder for us to “compete” with them "
Index: po/microsoft-verdict.pot
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/po/microsoft-verdict.pot,v
retrieving revision 1.11
retrieving revision 1.12
diff -u -b -r1.11 -r1.12
--- po/microsoft-verdict.pot 15 May 2013 19:29:03 -0000 1.11
+++ po/microsoft-verdict.pot 5 Jun 2013 17:28:31 -0000 1.12
@@ -7,7 +7,7 @@
msgid ""
msgstr ""
"Project-Id-Version: microsoft-verdict.html\n"
-"POT-Creation-Date: 2013-05-15 19:25+0000\n"
+"POT-Creation-Date: 2013-06-05 17:25+0000\n"
"PO-Revision-Date: YEAR-MO-DA HO:MI+ZONE\n"
"Last-Translator: FULL NAME <address@hidden>\n"
"Language-Team: LANGUAGE <address@hidden>\n"
@@ -27,7 +27,7 @@
msgid ""
"Many <a href=\"/gnu/linux-and-gnu.html\">GNU/Linux</a> users think of the "
"system as competition for Microsoft. But the Free Software Movement aims to "
-"solve a problem that is much bigger than Microsoft: proprietary, non-free "
+"solve a problem that is much bigger than Microsoft: proprietary, nonfree "
"software, designed to keep users helpless and prohibit cooperation. "
"Microsoft is the largest developer of such software, but many other "
"companies treat the users' freedom just as badly; if they have not shackled "
@@ -45,7 +45,7 @@
#. type: Content of: <p>
msgid ""
"If the remedies are designed to enable other companies compete in offering "
-"proprietary, non-free software, that will do the Free World no particular "
+"proprietary, nonfree software, that will do the Free World no particular "
"good. Alternative possible masters is not freedom. And competition could "
"lead them to do a “better” job, better in a narrow technical "
"sense; then it could be harder for us to “compete” with them "
Index: po/microsoft-verdict.ru.po
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/po/microsoft-verdict.ru.po,v
retrieving revision 1.14
retrieving revision 1.15
diff -u -b -r1.14 -r1.15
--- po/microsoft-verdict.ru.po 18 May 2013 06:43:44 -0000 1.14
+++ po/microsoft-verdict.ru.po 5 Jun 2013 17:28:31 -0000 1.15
@@ -7,7 +7,7 @@
msgid ""
msgstr ""
"Project-Id-Version: microsoft-verdict.html\n"
-"POT-Creation-Date: 2013-05-15 19:25+0000\n"
+"POT-Creation-Date: 2013-06-05 17:25+0000\n"
"PO-Revision-Date: 2013-05-16 17:17+0000\n"
"Last-Translator: Ineiev <address@hidden>\n"
"Language-Team: Russian <address@hidden>\n"
@@ -15,6 +15,7 @@
"MIME-Version: 1.0\n"
"Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8\n"
"Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit\n"
+"Outdated-Since: 2013-06-05 17:25+0000\n"
"Plural-Forms: nplurals=3; plural=(n%10==1 && n%100!=11 ? 0 : n%10>=2 && n"
"%10<=4 && (n%100<10 || n%100>=20) ? 1 : 2);\n"
@@ -31,10 +32,26 @@
# type: Content of: <p>
#. type: Content of: <p>
+# | Many <a href=\"/gnu/linux-and-gnu.html\">GNU/Linux</a> users think of the
+# | system as competition for Microsoft. But the Free Software Movement aims
+# | to solve a problem that is much bigger than Microsoft: proprietary,
+# | non[---]free software, designed to keep users helpless and prohibit
+# | cooperation. Microsoft is the largest developer of such software, but
+# | many other companies treat the users' freedom just as badly; if they have
+# | not shackled as many users as Microsoft, it is not for lack of trying.
+#, fuzzy
+#| msgid ""
+#| "Many <a href=\"/gnu/linux-and-gnu.html\">GNU/Linux</a> users think of the "
+#| "system as competition for Microsoft. But the Free Software Movement aims "
+#| "to solve a problem that is much bigger than Microsoft: proprietary, non-"
+#| "free software, designed to keep users helpless and prohibit cooperation. "
+#| "Microsoft is the largest developer of such software, but many other "
+#| "companies treat the users' freedom just as badly; if they have not "
+#| "shackled as many users as Microsoft, it is not for lack of trying."
msgid ""
"Many <a href=\"/gnu/linux-and-gnu.html\">GNU/Linux</a> users think of the "
"system as competition for Microsoft. But the Free Software Movement aims to "
-"solve a problem that is much bigger than Microsoft: proprietary, non-free "
+"solve a problem that is much bigger than Microsoft: proprietary, nonfree "
"software, designed to keep users helpless and prohibit cooperation. "
"Microsoft is the largest developer of such software, but many other "
"companies treat the users' freedom just as badly; if they have not shackled "
@@ -66,9 +83,32 @@
# type: Content of: <p>
#. type: Content of: <p>
+# | If the remedies are designed to enable other companies compete in offering
+# | proprietary, non[---]free software, that will do the Free World no
+# | particular good. Alternative possible masters is not freedom. And
+# | competition could lead them to do a “better” job, better in a
+# | narrow technical sense; then it could be harder for us to
+# | “compete” with them technically. We will continue to offer
+# | the user one thing those companies do not—freedom—and users
+# | who value freedom will continue to choose free software for that reason.
+# | But users who do not value freedom, and choose a system based on mere
+# | convenience, might be enticed away to “improved” proprietary
+# | systems.
+#, fuzzy
+#| msgid ""
+#| "If the remedies are designed to enable other companies compete in "
+#| "offering proprietary, non-free software, that will do the Free World no "
+#| "particular good. Alternative possible masters is not freedom. And "
+#| "competition could lead them to do a “better” job, better in a "
+#| "narrow technical sense; then it could be harder for us to “"
+#| "compete” with them technically. We will continue to offer the user "
+#| "one thing those companies do not—freedom—and users who value "
+#| "freedom will continue to choose free software for that reason. But users "
+#| "who do not value freedom, and choose a system based on mere convenience, "
+#| "might be enticed away to “improved” proprietary systems."
msgid ""
"If the remedies are designed to enable other companies compete in offering "
-"proprietary, non-free software, that will do the Free World no particular "
+"proprietary, nonfree software, that will do the Free World no particular "
"good. Alternative possible masters is not freedom. And competition could "
"lead them to do a “better” job, better in a narrow technical "
"sense; then it could be harder for us to “compete” with them "
Index: limit-patent-effect.ru.html
===================================================================
RCS file: limit-patent-effect.ru.html
diff -N limit-patent-effect.ru.html
--- /dev/null 1 Jan 1970 00:00:00 -0000
+++ limit-patent-effect.ru.html 5 Jun 2013 17:28:26 -0000 1.1
@@ -0,0 +1,225 @@
+
+
+<!--#include virtual="/server/header.ru.html" -->
+<!-- Parent-Version: 1.75 -->
+
+<!-- This file is automatically generated by GNUnited Nations! -->
+ <!--#set var="ENGLISH_PAGE" value="/philosophy/limit-patent-effect.en.html"
-->
+
+<title>ÐаÑиÑа оÑÑаÑли пÑогÑаммиÑÐ¾Ð²Ð°Ð½Ð¸Ñ Ð¾Ñ
паÑенÑов - ÐÑÐ¾ÐµÐºÑ GNU - Фонд Ñвободного
+пÑогÑаммного обеÑпеÑениÑ</title>
+
+<!--#include virtual="/philosophy/po/limit-patent-effect.translist" -->
+<!--#include virtual="/server/banner.ru.html" -->
+<h2>ÐаÑиÑа оÑÑаÑли пÑогÑаммиÑÐ¾Ð²Ð°Ð½Ð¸Ñ Ð¾Ñ
паÑенÑов</h2>
+
+<p><a href="http://www.stallman.org/";><strong>РиÑаÑд
СÑолмен</strong></a></p>
+
+<p><em>ÐеÑвонаÑалÑÐ½Ð°Ñ Ð²ÐµÑÑÐ¸Ñ ÑÑой ÑÑаÑÑи
бÑла опÑбликована в <a
+href="http://www.wired.com/opinion/2012/11/richard-stallman-software-patents/";>
+УайеÑед</a> в ноÑбÑе 2012 года.</em></p>
+
+<p>ÐаÑенÑÑ ÑгÑожаÑÑ ÐºÐ°Ð¶Ð´Ð¾Ð¼Ñ ÑазÑабоÑÑикÑ
пÑогÑамм, и паÑенÑнÑе войнÑ, коÑоÑÑÑ
+Ð¼Ñ Ð´Ð¾Ð»Ð³Ð¾ Ñо ÑÑÑаÑ
ом ожидали, наконеÑ
ÑазÑазилиÑÑ. РазÑабоÑÑикам пÑогÑамм и
+полÑзоваÑелÑм пÑогÑамм — а они
ÑоÑÑавлÑÑÑ Ð±Ð¾Ð»ÑÑинÑÑво в наÑем
+обÑеÑÑве — нÑждаÑÑÑÑ Ð² Ñом, ÑÑобÑ
пÑогÑÐ°Ð¼Ð¼Ñ Ð±Ñли ÑÐ²Ð¾Ð±Ð¾Ð´Ð½Ñ Ð¾Ñ
+паÑенÑов.</p>
+
+<p>ÐаÑенÑÑ, коÑоÑÑе нам ÑгÑожаÑÑ, ÑаÑÑо
назÑваÑÑ “паÑенÑами на
+пÑогÑаммє, но ÑÑо вÑÑажение вноÑиÑ
пÑÑаниÑÑ. Такие паÑенÑÑ Ð½Ðµ
+оÑноÑÑÑÑÑ Ð½Ð¸ к какой конкÑеÑной пÑогÑамме.
ÐапÑоÑив, каждÑй паÑÐµÐ½Ñ Ð¾Ð¿Ð¸ÑÑваеÑ
+некоÑоÑÑÑ Ð¿ÑакÑиÑеÑкÑÑ Ð¸Ð´ÐµÑ, и в нем
говоÑиÑÑÑ, ÑÑо на вÑÑкого, кÑо пÑоводиÑ
+ее в жизнÑ, можно подаÑÑ Ð² ÑÑд. Так ÑÑо
более ÑÑнÑм бÑло Ð±Ñ Ð½Ð°Ð·Ð²Ð°Ð½Ð¸Ðµ
+“паÑенÑÑ Ð½Ð° вÑÑиÑлиÑелÑнÑе идеи”.</p>
+
+<p>РпаÑенÑной ÑиÑÑеме СШРпаÑенÑÑ Ð½Ðµ
помеÑаÑÑÑÑ Ñак, ÑÑÐ¾Ð±Ñ Ð¼Ð¾Ð¶Ð½Ð¾ бÑло ÑказаÑÑ,
+ÑÑо ÑÑÐ¾Ñ Ð¿Ð°ÑÐµÐ½Ñ ÑвлÑеÑÑÑ “паÑенÑом на
пÑогÑаммє, а
+ÑÐ¾Ñ — неÑ. ÐÑ
ÑазлиÑаÑÑ ÑазÑабоÑÑики
пÑогÑамм — они
+оÑлиÑаÑÑ Ð¿Ð°ÑенÑÑ, коÑоÑÑе ÑгÑожаÑÑ Ð½Ð°Ð¼
(паÑенÑÑ, вÑданнÑе на идеи, коÑоÑÑе
+можно ÑеализоваÑÑ Ð² пÑогÑаммаÑ
), Ð¾Ñ Ð¿ÑоÑиÑ
паÑенÑов. ÐапÑимеÑ, еÑли
+запаÑенÑÐ¾Ð²Ð°Ð½Ð½Ð°Ñ Ð¸Ð´ÐµÑ ÑоÑÑÐ¾Ð¸Ñ Ð² ÑоÑме
ÑизиÑеÑкой ÑÑÑÑкÑÑÑÑ Ð¸Ð»Ð¸ в Ñ
имиÑеÑкой
+ÑеакÑии, Ñо Ð½Ð¸ÐºÐ°ÐºÐ°Ñ Ð¿ÑогÑамма ее
ÑеализоваÑÑ Ð½Ðµ можеÑ; ÑÑÐ¾Ñ Ð¿Ð°ÑÐµÐ½Ñ Ð½Ðµ
+ÑгÑÐ¾Ð¶Ð°ÐµÑ Ð¾ÑÑаÑли пÑогÑаммиÑованиÑ. Ðо
еÑли запаÑенÑÐ¾Ð²Ð°Ð½Ð½Ð°Ñ Ð¸Ð´ÐµÑ Ð·Ð°ÐºÐ»ÑÑаеÑÑÑ
+в вÑÑиÑлении, Ñо дÑло ÑÑого паÑенÑа
ÑмоÑÑÐ¸Ñ Ð½Ð° ÑазÑабоÑÑиков и полÑзоваÑелей
+пÑогÑамм.</p>
+
+<p>Ðе Ñо ÑÑÐ¾Ð±Ñ Ð¿Ð°ÑенÑÑ Ð½Ð° вÑÑиÑлиÑелÑнÑе
идеи запÑеÑали ÑолÑко пÑогÑаммÑ. ÐÑи
+идеи можно ÑеализоваÑÑ Ð¸ аппаÑаÑно —
и многие из ниÑ
бÑли
+ÑÐµÐ°Ð»Ð¸Ð·Ð¾Ð²Ð°Ð½Ñ Ð°Ð¿Ð¿Ð°ÑаÑно. ÐаждÑй паÑенÑ, как
пÑавило, ÑаÑпÑоÑÑÑанÑеÑÑÑ ÐºÐ°Ðº на
+аппаÑаÑнÑе, <em>Ñак и на пÑогÑаммнÑе</em>
ÑеализаÑии идеи.</p>
+
+<h3>ÐÑÐ¾Ð±Ð°Ñ Ð¿Ñоблема пÑогÑамм</h3>
+
+<p>Тем не менее в ÑлÑÑае пÑогÑамм паÑенÑÑ Ð½Ð°
вÑÑиÑлиÑелÑнÑе идеи пÑиводÑÑ Ðº
+оÑобой пÑоблеме. Ð ÑÑом ÑлÑÑае в одной
пÑогÑамме легко ÑеализоваÑÑ
+одновÑеменно ÑÑÑÑÑи идей. ÐÑли 10% из ниÑ
запаÑенÑованÑ, ÑÑо знаÑиÑ, ÑÑо
+пÑогÑамме ÑгÑожаÑÑ ÑоÑни паÑенÑов.</p>
+
+<p>Ðогда Ðан РейвиÑÐµÑ Ð¸Ð· ÐбÑеÑÑвенного
паÑенÑного Ñонда изÑÑил
+в 2004 Ð³Ð¾Ð´Ñ Ð¾Ð´Ð½Ñ ÐºÑÑпнÑÑ Ð¿ÑогÑÐ°Ð¼Ð¼Ñ (Linux,
коÑоÑÐ°Ñ ÑвлÑеÑÑÑ ÑдÑом
+опеÑаÑионной ÑиÑÑÐµÐ¼Ñ <a href="/gnu/gnu-linux-faq.html">
GNU/Linux</a>), он
+наÑÑиÑал 283 паÑенÑа СШÐ, коÑоÑÑе,
по-видимомÑ, ÑаÑпÑоÑÑÑанÑлиÑÑ Ð½Ð°
+вÑÑиÑлиÑелÑнÑе идеи, ÑеализованнÑе в иÑÑ
одном ÑекÑÑе ÑÑой пÑогÑаммÑ. Ð Ñом
+же Ñамом Ð³Ð¾Ð´Ñ Ð¾Ð´Ð¸Ð½ жÑÑнал Ñделал оÑенкÑ, по
коÑоÑой Ð´Ð¾Ð»Ñ Linux ÑоÑÑавлÑла
+0,25% Ð¾Ñ Ð²Ñей ÑиÑÑÐµÐ¼Ñ GNU/Linux. Умножив 300 на 400,
Ð¼Ñ Ð¿Ð¾Ð»ÑÑаем гÑÑбÑÑ
+оÑенкÑ, ÑоглаÑно коÑоÑой ÑиÑÑеме в Ñелом
<em>ÑгÑожало поÑÑдка ÑÑа ÑÑÑÑÑ
+паÑенÑов</em>.</p>
+
+<p>ÐÑли Ð±Ñ Ð¿Ð¾Ð»Ð¾Ð²Ð¸Ð½Ð° из ÑÑиÑ
паÑенÑов бÑла
иÑклÑÑена по пÑиÑине “низкого
+каÑеÑÑва” — Ñ.е. оÑибок паÑенÑной
ÑиÑÑÐµÐ¼Ñ — ÑÑо
+Ð±Ñ Ð¼Ð°Ð»Ð¾ ÑÑо изменило. СÑо ÑÑÑÑÑ Ð¿Ð°ÑенÑов
или пÑÑÑдеÑÑÑ ÑÑÑÑÑ —
+вÑе Ñавно ÑÑо Ñакое же бедÑÑвие. ÐÐ¾Ñ Ð¿Ð¾ÑемÑ
бÑло Ð±Ñ Ð¾Ñибкой огÑаниÑиваÑÑ
+наÑÑ ÐºÑиÑÐ¸ÐºÑ ÑолÑко “паÑенÑнÑми
ÑÑоллÑми” или
+“низкокаÑеÑÑвеннÑми” паÑенÑами.
СамÑй злоÑÑнÑй из ÑегоднÑÑниÑ
+паÑенÑнÑÑ
агÑеÑÑоÑов — ÐºÐ¾Ð¼Ð¿Ð°Ð½Ð¸Ñ Apple,
коÑоÑÐ°Ñ Ð½Ðµ ÑвлÑеÑÑÑ
+“ÑÑоллем” в обÑÑном опÑеделении; Ñ Ð½Ðµ
знаÑ, ÑвлÑÑÑÑÑ Ð»Ð¸ паÑенÑÑ
+Apple “каÑеÑÑвеннÑми”, но Ñем вÑÑе
“каÑеÑÑво”
+паÑенÑа, Ñем опаÑнее его ÑгÑоза.</p>
+
+<p>Ðам нÑжно ÑеÑаÑÑ Ð²ÑÑ Ð¿ÑоблемÑ, а не
ÑолÑко ÑаÑÑÑ ÐµÐµ.</p>
+
+<p>ÐбÑÑно Ð´Ð»Ñ ÑÑÑÑÐ°Ð½ÐµÐ½Ð¸Ñ ÑÑой пÑÐ¾Ð±Ð»ÐµÐ¼Ñ Ð½Ð°
законодаÑелÑном ÑÑовне пÑедлагаÑÑ
+измениÑÑ ÐºÑиÑеÑии вÑдаÑи паÑенÑов —
напÑимеÑ, запÑеÑиÑÑ Ð²ÑдаваÑÑ
+паÑенÑÑ Ð½Ð° вÑÑиÑлиÑелÑнÑÑ Ð¿ÑакÑÐ¸ÐºÑ Ð¸
ÑиÑÑемÑ, коÑоÑÑе ее оÑÑÑеÑÑвлÑÑÑ. У
+ÑÑого подÑ
ода еÑÑÑ Ð´Ð²Ð° недоÑÑаÑка.</p>
+
+<p>Ðо-пеÑвÑÑ
, паÑенÑнÑе ÑÑиÑÑÑ ÑмеÑÑ
иÑкÑÑно пеÑеÑоÑмÑлиÑоваÑÑ Ð¿Ð°ÑенÑÑ, ÑÑобÑ
+они пÑоÑли по вÑем пÑавилам, какие ÑолÑко
можно пÑимениÑÑ; они ÑводÑÑ Ð»ÑбÑÑ
+попÑÑÐºÑ Ð¾Ð³ÑаниÑиÑÑ ÑÑÑноÑÑÑ Ð¿Ð°ÑенÑов к
пÑоÑÑой ÑоÑмалÑноÑÑи. ÐапÑимеÑ,
+многие паÑенÑÑ Ð¡Ð¨Ð Ð½Ð° вÑÑиÑлиÑелÑнÑе идеи
опиÑÑваÑÑ ÑиÑÑемÑ, в коÑоÑÑÑ
+вÑ
Ð¾Ð´Ð¸Ñ Ð°ÑиÑмеÑиÑеÑкое ÑÑÑÑойÑÑво,
ÑÑÑÑойÑÑво вÑбоÑки команд, памÑÑÑ, а Ñакже
+оÑÐ³Ð°Ð½Ñ ÑпÑÐ°Ð²Ð»ÐµÐ½Ð¸Ñ Ð´Ð»Ñ Ð¿ÑоведениÑ
конкÑеÑного вÑÑиÑлениÑ. ÐÑо ÑвоеобÑазнÑй
+ÑпоÑоб опиÑÐ°Ð½Ð¸Ñ ÐºÐ¾Ð¼Ð¿ÑÑÑеÑа, вÑполнÑÑÑего
пÑогÑаммÑ, коÑоÑÐ°Ñ Ð¿ÑоводиÑ
+опÑеделенное вÑÑиÑление; он бÑл вÑдÑман
Ð´Ð»Ñ Ñого, ÑÑÐ¾Ð±Ñ Ð¿ÑивеÑÑи заÑÐ²ÐºÑ Ð½Ð°
+паÑÐµÐ½Ñ Ð² ÑооÑвеÑÑÑвие Ñ ÐºÑиÑеÑиÑми,
коÑоÑÑÑ
, как некоÑоÑое вÑÐµÐ¼Ñ ÑÑиÑалоÑÑ,
+ÑÑебовала паÑенÑÐ½Ð°Ñ ÑиÑÑема СШÐ.</p>
+
+<p>Ðо-вÑоÑÑÑ
, в СШРÑже еÑÑÑ Ð¼Ð½Ð¾Ð³Ð¾ ÑÑÑÑÑ
паÑенÑов на вÑÑиÑлиÑелÑнÑе идеи, Ñак
+ÑÑо изменение кÑиÑеÑиев длÑ
пÑедоÑвÑаÑÐµÐ½Ð¸Ñ Ð²ÑдаÑи новÑÑ
паÑенÑов не
избавило
+Ð±Ñ Ð¾Ñ Ñже ÑÑÑеÑÑвÑÑÑиÑ
. Ðам пÑиÑлоÑÑ Ð±Ñ
ждаÑÑ Ð¿Ð¾ÑÑи двадÑаÑÑ Ð»ÐµÑ, пока
+пÑоблема бÑла Ð±Ñ Ð¿Ð¾Ð»Ð½Ð¾ÑÑÑÑ ÑÑÑÑанена по
завеÑÑении дейÑÑÐ²Ð¸Ñ ÑÑиÑ
+паÑенÑов. ÐÑ Ð¼Ð¾Ð³Ð»Ð¸ Ð±Ñ Ð¿ÑедÑÑавиÑÑ Ñебе
оÑÐ¼ÐµÐ½Ñ ÑÑиÑ
ÑÑÑеÑÑвÑÑÑиÑ
паÑенÑов в
+законодаÑелÑном поÑÑдке, но ÑÑо, веÑоÑÑно,
неконÑÑиÑÑÑионно (ÐеÑÑ
овнÑй ÑÑд
+ÑпÑÑмо наÑÑаивал, ÑÑо ÐонгÑеÑÑ Ð¼Ð¾Ð¶ÐµÑ
ÑаÑÑиÑÑÑÑ ÑаÑÑнÑе пÑивилегии за ÑÑеÑ
+пÑав обÑеÑÑва, но ÑÑо не Ð¼Ð¾Ð¶ÐµÑ Ð¿ÑоизойÑи в
обÑаÑном напÑавлении).</p>
+
+<h3>ÐÑÑгой подÑ
од: огÑаниÑиÑÑ Ð´ÐµÐ¹ÑÑвие, а не
паÑенÑоÑпоÑобноÑÑÑ</h3>
+
+<p>Ðое пÑедложение — измениÑÑ
<em>дейÑÑвие</em> паÑенÑов. Ðам
+ÑледÑÐµÑ Ð¸Ð·Ð¼ÐµÐ½Ð¸ÑÑ Ð·Ð°ÐºÐ¾Ð½Ñ Ñак, ÑÑобÑ
ÑазÑабоÑка, ÑаÑпÑоÑÑÑанение или запÑÑк
+пÑогÑÐ°Ð¼Ð¼Ñ Ð½Ð° вÑÑиÑлиÑелÑной аппаÑаÑÑÑе
обÑего пÑÐ¸Ð¼ÐµÐ½ÐµÐ½Ð¸Ñ Ð½Ðµ ÑоÑÑавлÑли
+наÑÑÑÐµÐ½Ð¸Ñ Ð¿Ð°ÑенÑа. У ÑÑого подÑ
ода
неÑколÑко доÑÑоинÑÑв:</p>
+
+<ul>
+<li>Ðн не ÑÑебÑÐµÑ ÐºÐ»Ð°ÑÑиÑикаÑии паÑенÑов
или заÑвок на паÑенÑÑ ÐºÐ°Ðº
+“пÑогÑаммнÑÑ
” или “непÑогÑаммнÑÑ
”.</li>
+<li>Ðн пÑедоÑÑавлÑÐµÑ ÑазÑабоÑÑикам и
полÑзоваÑелÑм заÑиÑÑ ÐºÐ°Ðº Ð¾Ñ ÑÑÑеÑÑвÑÑÑиÑ
+паÑенÑов на вÑÑиÑлиÑелÑнÑе идеи, Ñак и оÑ
паÑенÑов, возможнÑÑ
в бÑдÑÑем.</li>
+<li>ÐаÑенÑнÑе ÑÑиÑÑÑ Ð½Ðµ могÑÑ ÑвеÑÑи на неÑ
желаемÑй ÑÑÑÐµÐºÑ Ð¸Ð·Ð¼ÐµÐ½ÐµÐ½Ð¸ÐµÐ¼ ÑоÑмÑ
+заÑвок.</li>
+</ul>
+
+<p>ÐÑÐ¾Ñ Ð¿Ð¾Ð´Ñ
од полноÑÑÑÑ Ð½Ðµ оÑменÑеÑ
ÑÑÑеÑÑвÑÑÑие паÑенÑÑ Ð½Ð° вÑÑиÑлиÑелÑнÑе
+идеи, поÑÐ¾Ð¼Ñ ÑÑо они по-пÑÐµÐ¶Ð½ÐµÐ¼Ñ Ð±Ñли бÑ
пÑÐ¸Ð¼ÐµÐ½Ð¸Ð¼Ñ Ðº ÑеализаÑиÑм в
+аппаÑаÑÑÑе ÑпеÑиалÑного назнаÑениÑ. ÐÑо
доÑÑоинÑÑво, поÑÐ¾Ð¼Ñ ÑÑо ÑÑо
+иÑклÑÑÐ°ÐµÑ ÑпоÑÑ Ð¾ легиÑимноÑÑи ÑÑого
плана. ÐеÑколÑко Ð»ÐµÑ Ð½Ð°Ð·Ð°Ð´ в СШРбÑл
+пÑинÑÑ Ð·Ð°ÐºÐ¾Ð½, пÑикÑÑваÑÑий Ð¾Ñ Ð¿Ð°ÑенÑнÑÑ
пÑеÑледований Ñ
иÑÑÑгов, Ñак ÑÑо
+Ñ
иÑÑÑги в безопаÑноÑÑи, даже еÑли Ñ
иÑÑÑгиÑеÑкие пÑоÑедÑÑÑ
+запаÑенÑованÑ. ÐÑÐ¾Ñ Ð·Ð°ÐºÐ¾Ð½ Ð´Ð°ÐµÑ Ð¿ÑеÑеденÑ
Ð´Ð»Ñ ÑÑого ÑеÑениÑ.</p>
+
+<p>РазÑабоÑÑики и полÑзоваÑели пÑогÑамм
нÑждаÑÑÑÑ Ð² заÑиÑе Ð¾Ñ Ð¿Ð°ÑенÑов. ÐÑо
+единÑÑвенное законодаÑелÑное ÑеÑение,
коÑоÑое пÑедоÑÑавило вÑем Ð±Ñ Ð¿Ð¾Ð»Ð½ÑÑ
+заÑиÑÑ. Тогда Ð¼Ñ Ð¼Ð¾Ð³Ð»Ð¸ Ð±Ñ Ð¾Ð¿ÑÑÑ Ð²ÐµÑнÑÑÑÑÑ Ðº
конкÑÑенÑии или
+ÑоÑÑÑдниÑеÑÑвÑ... не боÑÑÑ, ÑÑо
какой-нибÑÐ´Ñ Ð½ÐµÐ·Ð½Ð°ÐºÐ¾Ð¼ÐµÑ Ð·Ð°ÑеÑÐºÐ½ÐµÑ Ð²ÑÑ Ð½Ð°ÑÑ
+ÑабоÑÑ.</p>
+
+<p><em>См. Ñакже: <a
href="/philosophy/patent-reform-is-not-enough.html">
+ÐаÑенÑной ÑеÑоÑÐ¼Ñ Ð½Ðµ доÑÑаÑоÑно</a></em></p>
+
+
+<div style="font-size: small;">
+
+<!--TRANSLATORS: Use space (SPC) as msgstr if you don't have notes.-->
+ </div>
+</div>
+
+<!-- for id="content", starts in the include above -->
+<!--#include virtual="/server/footer.ru.html" -->
+<div id="footer">
+
+<p>ÐожалÑйÑÑа, пÑиÑÑлайÑе обÑие запÑоÑÑ
ÑÐ¾Ð½Ð´Ñ Ð¸ GNU по адÑеÑÑ <a
+href="mailto:address@hidden";><address@hidden></a>. ÐÑÑÑ Ñакже <a
+href="/contact/">дÑÑгие ÑпоÑÐ¾Ð±Ñ ÑвÑзаÑÑÑÑ</a> Ñ
Ñондом. ÐÑÑеÑÑ Ð¾
+неÑабоÑаÑÑиÑ
ÑÑÑлкаÑ
и дÑÑгие попÑавки
или пÑÐµÐ´Ð»Ð¾Ð¶ÐµÐ½Ð¸Ñ Ð¼Ð¾Ð¶Ð½Ð¾ пÑиÑÑлаÑÑ Ð¿Ð¾
+адÑеÑÑ <a href="mailto:address@hidden";><address@hidden></a>.</p>
+
+<p>
+<!-- TRANSLATORS: Ignore the original text in this paragraph,
+ replace it with the translation of these two:
+
+ We work hard and do our best to provide accurate, good quality
+ translations. However, we are not exempt from imperfection.
+ Please send your comments and general suggestions in this regard
+ to <a href="mailto:address@hidden";>
+
+ <address@hidden></a>.</p>
+
+ <p>For information on coordinating and submitting translations of
+ our web pages, see <a
+ href="/server/standards/README.translations.html">Translations
+ README</a>. -->
+ÐÑ ÑÑаÑалиÑÑ ÑделаÑÑ ÑÑÐ¾Ñ Ð¿ÐµÑевод ÑоÑнÑм и
каÑеÑÑвеннÑм, но иÑклÑÑиÑÑ
+возможноÑÑÑ Ð¾Ñибки Ð¼Ñ Ð½Ðµ можем.
ÐÑиÑÑлайÑе, пожалÑйÑÑа, Ñвои замеÑÐ°Ð½Ð¸Ñ Ð¸
+пÑÐµÐ´Ð»Ð¾Ð¶ÐµÐ½Ð¸Ñ Ð¿Ð¾ пеÑÐµÐ²Ð¾Ð´Ñ Ð¿Ð¾ адÑеÑÑ <a
+href="mailto:address@hidden";><address@hidden></a>.
+</p><p>Ð¡Ð²ÐµÐ´ÐµÐ½Ð¸Ñ Ð¿Ð¾ кооÑдинаÑии и
пÑедложениÑм пеÑеводов наÑиÑ
ÑÑаÑей Ñм. в
+<a href="/server/standards/README.translations.html">“Ð
ÑководÑÑве по
+пеÑеводам”</a>.</p>
+
+<!-- Regarding copyright, in general, standalone pages (as opposed to
+ files generated as part of manuals) on the GNU web server should
+ be under CC BY-ND 3.0 US. Please do NOT change or remove this
+ without talking with the webmasters or licensing team first.
+ Please make sure the copyright date is consistent with the
+ document. For web pages, it is ok to list just the latest year the
+ document was modified, or published.
+
+ If you wish to list earlier years, that is ok too.
+ Either "2001, 2002, 2003" or "2001-2003" are ok for specifying
+ years, as long as each year in the range is in fact a copyrightable
+ year, i.e., a year in which the document was published (including
+ being publicly visible on the web or in a revision control system).
+
+ There is more detail about copyright years in the GNU Maintainers
+ Information document, www.gnu.org/prep/maintain. -->
+<p>Copyright © 2012, 2013 Free Software Foundation, Inc.</p>
+
+<p>ÐÑо пÑоизведение доÑÑÑпно по <a rel="license"
+href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/3.0/us/deed.ru";>лиÑензии
+Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivs (<em>ÐÑÑибÑÑÐ¸Ñ —
Ðез
+пÑоизводнÑÑ
пÑоизведений</em>) 3.0 СШÐ</a>.
+</p>
+
+<!--#include virtual="/server/bottom-notes.ru.html" -->
+<div class="translators-credits">
+
+<!--TRANSLATORS: Use space (SPC) as msgstr if you don't want credits.-->
+<em>Ðнимание! РподгоÑовке ÑÑого пеÑевода
ÑÑаÑÑвовал ÑолÑко один Ñеловек. ÐÑ
+можеÑе ÑÑÑеÑÑвенно ÑлÑÑÑиÑÑ Ð¿ÐµÑевод, еÑли
пÑовеÑиÑе его и ÑаÑÑкажеÑе о
+найденнÑÑ
оÑибкаÑ
в <a
+href="http://savannah.gnu.org/projects/www-ru";>ÑÑÑÑкой гÑÑппе
пеÑеводов
+gnu.org</a>.</em></div>
+
+
+ <p>
+<!-- timestamp start -->
+Ðбновлено:
+
+$Date: 2013/06/05 17:28:26 $
+
+<!-- timestamp end -->
+</p>
+</div>
+</div>
+</body>
+</html>
Index: po/limit-patent-effect.ru-en.html
===================================================================
RCS file: po/limit-patent-effect.ru-en.html
diff -N po/limit-patent-effect.ru-en.html
--- /dev/null 1 Jan 1970 00:00:00 -0000
+++ po/limit-patent-effect.ru-en.html 5 Jun 2013 17:28:28 -0000 1.1
@@ -0,0 +1,193 @@
+<!--#include virtual="/server/header.html" -->
+<!-- Parent-Version: 1.75 -->
+<title>Giving the Software Field Protection from Patents
+- GNU Project - Free Software Foundation</title>
+<!--#include virtual="/philosophy/po/limit-patent-effect.translist" -->
+<!--#include virtual="/server/banner.html" -->
+<h2>Giving the Software Field Protection from Patents</h2>
+
+<p>by <a href="http://www.stallman.org/";><strong>Richard
+Stallman</strong></a></p>
+
+<p><em>A version of this article was first published at
+<a
href="http://www.wired.com/opinion/2012/11/richard-stallman-software-patents/";>Wired</a>
+in November 2012.</em></p>
+
+<p>Patents threaten every software developer, and the patent wars we have
+long feared have broken out. Software developers and software
+users—which in our society, is most people—need software
+to be free of patents.</p>
+
+<p>The patents that threaten us are often called “software
+patents”, but that term is misleading. Such patents are not
+about any specific program. Rather, each patent describes some
+practical idea, and says that anyone carrying out the idea can be
+sued. So it is clearer to call them “computational idea
+patents”.</p>
+
+<p>The US patent system doesn't label patents to say this one's a
+“software patent” and that one isn't. Software developers
+are the ones who make a distinction between the patents that threaten
+us—those that cover ideas that can be implemented in
+software—and the rest. For example, if the patented idea is the
+shape of a physical structure or a chemical reaction, no program can
+implement that idea; that patent doesn't threaten the software field.
+But if the idea that's patented is a computation, that patent's barrel
+points at software developers and users.</p>
+
+<p>This is not to say that computational idea patents prohibit only
+software. These ideas can also be implemented in hardware—and
+many of them have been. Each patent typically covers both hardware
+<em>and</em> software implementations of the idea.</p>
+
+<h3>The Special Problem of Software</h3>
+
+<p>Still, software is where computational idea patents cause a special
+problem. In software, it's easy to implement thousands of ideas
+together in one program. If 10% are patented, that means hundreds of
+patents threaten it.</p>
+
+<p>When Dan Ravicher of the Public Patent Foundation studied one large program
+(Linux, which is the kernel of the
+<a href="/gnu/gnu-linux-faq.html"> GNU/Linux</a> operating system) in
+2004, he found 283 US patents that appeared to cover computing ideas
+implemented in the source code of that program. That same year, a
+magazine estimated that Linux was .25% of the whole GNU/Linux system.
+Multiplying 300 by 400 we get the order-of-magnitude estimate that the
+system as a whole was <em>threatened by around 100,000 patents</em>.</p>
+
+<p>If half of those patents were eliminated as “bad
+quality”—mistakes of the patent system, that
+is—it would not really change things. Whether 100,000 patents
+or 50,000, it's the same disaster. This is why it's a mistake to
+limit our criticism of software patents to just “patent
+trolls” or “bad quality” patents. The worst patent
+aggressor today is Apple, which isn't a “troll” by the
+usual definition; I don't know whether Apple's patents are “good
+quality”, but the better the patent's “quality” the
+more dangerous its threat.</p>
+
+<p>We need to fix the whole problem, not just part.</p>
+
+<p>The usual suggestions for correcting this problem legislatively
+involve changing the criteria for granting patents—for instance,
+to ban issuance of patents on computational practices and systems to
+perform them. This approach has two drawbacks.</p>
+
+<p>First, patent lawyers are clever at reformulating patents to fit
+whatever rules may apply; they transform any attempt at limiting the
+substance of patents into a requirement of mere form. For instance,
+many US computational idea patents describe a system including an
+arithmetic unit, an instruction sequencer, a memory, plus controls to
+carry out a particular computation. This is a peculiar way of
+describing a computer running a program that does a certain
+computation; it was designed to make the patent application satisfy criteria
+that the US patent system was believed for a time to require.</p>
+
+<p>Second, the US already has many thousands of computational idea
+patents, and changing the criteria to prevent issuing more would not
+get rid of the existing ones. We would have to wait almost 20 years
+for the problem to be entirely corrected through the expiration of
+these patents. We could envision legislating the abolition of these
+existing patents, but that is probably unconstitutional. (The Supreme
+Court has perversely insisted that Congress can extend private
+privileges at the expense of the public's rights but that it can't go
+in the other direction.)</p>
+
+<h3>A Different Approach: Limit Effect, Not Patentability</h3>
+
+<p>My suggestion is to change the <em>effect</em> of patents. We
+should legislate that developing, distributing, or running a program
+on generally used computing hardware does not constitute patent
+infringement. This approach has several advantages:</p>
+
+<ul>
+<li>It does not require classifying patents or patent applications as
+“software” or “not software”.</li>
+<li>It provides developers and users with protection from both existing
+and potential future computational idea patents.</li>
+<li>Patent lawyers cannot defeat the intended effect by writing
+applications differently.</li>
+</ul>
+
+<p>This approach doesn't entirely invalidate existing computational idea
+patents, because they would continue to apply to implementations using
+special-purpose hardware. This is an advantage because it eliminates
+an argument against the legal validity of the plan. The US passed a
+law some years ago shielding surgeons from patent lawsuits, so that
+even if surgical procedures are patented, surgeons are safe. That
+provides a precedent for this solution.</p>
+
+<p>Software developers and software users need protection from patents.
+This is the only legislative solution that would provide full
+protection for all. We could then go back to competing or
+cooperating… without the fear that some stranger will wipe away
+our work.</p>
+
+<p><em>See also:
+<a href="/philosophy/patent-reform-is-not-enough.html">
+Patent Reform Is Not Enough</a></em></p>
+
+</div><!-- for id="content", starts in the include above -->
+<!--#include virtual="/server/footer.html" -->
+<div id="footer">
+
+<p>Please send general FSF & GNU inquiries to <a
+href="mailto:address@hidden";><address@hidden></a>. There are also <a
+href="/contact/">other ways to contact</a> the FSF. Broken links and other
+corrections or suggestions can be sent to <a
+href="mailto:address@hidden";><address@hidden></a>.</p>
+
+<p><!-- TRANSLATORS: Ignore the original text in this paragraph,
+ replace it with the translation of these two:
+
+ We work hard and do our best to provide accurate, good quality
+ translations. However, we are not exempt from imperfection.
+ Please send your comments and general suggestions in this regard
+ to <a href="mailto:address@hidden";>
+ <address@hidden></a>.</p>
+
+ <p>For information on coordinating and submitting translations of
+ our web pages, see <a
+ href="/server/standards/README.translations.html">Translations
+ README</a>. -->
+Please see the <a
+href="/server/standards/README.translations.html">Translations README</a> for
+information on coordinating and submitting translations of this article.</p>
+
+<!-- Regarding copyright, in general, standalone pages (as opposed to
+ files generated as part of manuals) on the GNU web server should
+ be under CC BY-ND 3.0 US. Please do NOT change or remove this
+ without talking with the webmasters or licensing team first.
+ Please make sure the copyright date is consistent with the
+ document. For web pages, it is ok to list just the latest year the
+ document was modified, or published.
+
+ If you wish to list earlier years, that is ok too.
+ Either "2001, 2002, 2003" or "2001-2003" are ok for specifying
+ years, as long as each year in the range is in fact a copyrightable
+ year, i.e., a year in which the document was published (including
+ being publicly visible on the web or in a revision control system).
+
+ There is more detail about copyright years in the GNU Maintainers
+ Information document, www.gnu.org/prep/maintain. -->
+
+<p>Copyright © 2012, 2013 Free Software Foundation, Inc.</p>
+
+<p>This page is licensed under a <a rel="license"
+href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/3.0/us/";>Creative
+Commons Attribution-NoDerivs 3.0 United States License</a>.
+</p>
+
+<!--#include virtual="/server/bottom-notes.html" -->
+
+<p>
+Updated:
+<!-- timestamp start -->
+$Date: 2013/06/05 17:28:28 $
+<!-- timestamp end -->
+</p>
+</div>
+</div>
+</body>
+</html>
| [Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread] |
- www/philosophy po/limit-patent-effect.translist...,
GNUN <=