[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
www/philosophy freedom-or-copyright-old.nl.html...
|
From: |
GNUN |
|
Subject: |
www/philosophy freedom-or-copyright-old.nl.html... |
|
Date: |
Mon, 08 Apr 2013 05:28:49 +0000 |
CVSROOT: /web/www
Module name: www
Changes by: GNUN <gnun> 13/04/08 05:28:49
Modified files:
philosophy : freedom-or-copyright-old.nl.html
microsoft-old.ca.html microsoft-old.ko.html
microsoft-old.nl.html
Added files:
philosophy/po : freedom-or-copyright-old.nl-diff.html
microsoft-old.ca-diff.html
microsoft-old.ko-diff.html
microsoft-old.nl-diff.html
Log message:
Automatic update by GNUnited Nations.
CVSWeb URLs:
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/freedom-or-copyright-old.nl.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.6&r2=1.7
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/microsoft-old.ca.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.12&r2=1.13
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/microsoft-old.ko.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.16&r2=1.17
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/microsoft-old.nl.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.4&r2=1.5
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/po/freedom-or-copyright-old.nl-diff.html?cvsroot=www&rev=1.1
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/po/microsoft-old.ca-diff.html?cvsroot=www&rev=1.1
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/po/microsoft-old.ko-diff.html?cvsroot=www&rev=1.1
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/po/microsoft-old.nl-diff.html?cvsroot=www&rev=1.1
Patches:
Index: freedom-or-copyright-old.nl.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/freedom-or-copyright-old.nl.html,v
retrieving revision 1.6
retrieving revision 1.7
diff -u -b -r1.6 -r1.7
--- freedom-or-copyright-old.nl.html 22 Nov 2012 04:27:23 -0000 1.6
+++ freedom-or-copyright-old.nl.html 8 Apr 2013 05:28:48 -0000 1.7
@@ -8,6 +8,13 @@
<title>Vrijheid of Auteursrecht? - GNU Project - Free Software Foundation
(FSF)</title>
<!--#include virtual="/server/banner.nl.html" -->
+<!--#set var="PO_FILE"
+ value='<a
href="http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/po/freedom-or-copyright-old.nl.po";>
+ http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/po/freedom-or-copyright-old.nl.po</a>' -->
+ <!--#set var="ORIGINAL_FILE"
value="/philosophy/freedom-or-copyright-old.html" -->
+ <!--#set var="DIFF_FILE"
value="/philosophy/po/freedom-or-copyright-old.nl-diff.html" -->
+ <!--#set var="OUTDATED_SINCE" value="2013-02-07" -->
+ <!--#include virtual="/server/outdated.nl.html" -->
<!--#include virtual="/philosophy/po/freedom-or-copyright-old.translist" -->
<h2>Vrijheid of Auteursrecht?</h2>
@@ -179,7 +186,7 @@
<!-- timestamp start -->
Bijgewerkt:
-$Date: 2012/11/22 04:27:23 $
+$Date: 2013/04/08 05:28:48 $
<!-- timestamp end -->
</p>
Index: microsoft-old.ca.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/microsoft-old.ca.html,v
retrieving revision 1.12
retrieving revision 1.13
diff -u -b -r1.12 -r1.13
--- microsoft-old.ca.html 27 Sep 2012 16:53:59 -0000 1.12
+++ microsoft-old.ca.html 8 Apr 2013 05:28:48 -0000 1.13
@@ -7,6 +7,13 @@
<title>Ãs Microsoft el Papu? - GNU Project - Free Software Foundation
(FSF)</title>
<!--#include virtual="/server/banner.ca.html" -->
+<!--#set var="PO_FILE"
+ value='<a href="http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/po/microsoft-old.ca.po";>
+ http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/po/microsoft-old.ca.po</a>' -->
+ <!--#set var="ORIGINAL_FILE" value="/philosophy/microsoft-old.html" -->
+ <!--#set var="DIFF_FILE" value="/philosophy/po/microsoft-old.ca-diff.html" -->
+ <!--#set var="OUTDATED_SINCE" value="2013-02-07" -->
+ <!--#include virtual="/server/outdated.ca.html" -->
<!--#include virtual="/philosophy/po/microsoft-old.translist" -->
<h2>Ãs Microsoft el Papu?</h2>
@@ -107,7 +114,7 @@
<!-- timestamp start -->
Updated:
-$Date: 2012/09/27 16:53:59 $
+$Date: 2013/04/08 05:28:48 $
<!-- timestamp end -->
</p>
Index: microsoft-old.ko.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/microsoft-old.ko.html,v
retrieving revision 1.16
retrieving revision 1.17
diff -u -b -r1.16 -r1.17
--- microsoft-old.ko.html 27 Sep 2012 16:53:59 -0000 1.16
+++ microsoft-old.ko.html 8 Apr 2013 05:28:48 -0000 1.17
@@ -7,6 +7,13 @@
<title>ë§ì´í¬ë¡ìíí¸ë ê±°ëí ì
ë§ì¸ê°? - GNU íë¡ì í¸ -
ìì ìíí¸ì¨ì´ ì¬ë¨ (FSF)</title>
<!--#include virtual="/server/banner.ko.html" -->
+<!--#set var="PO_FILE"
+ value='<a href="http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/po/microsoft-old.ko.po";>
+ http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/po/microsoft-old.ko.po</a>' -->
+ <!--#set var="ORIGINAL_FILE" value="/philosophy/microsoft-old.html" -->
+ <!--#set var="DIFF_FILE" value="/philosophy/po/microsoft-old.ko-diff.html" -->
+ <!--#set var="OUTDATED_SINCE" value="2013-02-07" -->
+ <!--#include virtual="/server/outdated.ko.html" -->
<!--#include virtual="/philosophy/po/microsoft-old.translist" -->
<h2>ë§ì´í¬ë¡ìíí¸ë ê±°ëí ì
ë§ì¸ê°?</h2>
@@ -94,7 +101,7 @@
<!-- timestamp start -->
ìµì¢
ìì ì¼:
-$Date: 2012/09/27 16:53:59 $
+$Date: 2013/04/08 05:28:48 $
<!-- timestamp end -->
</p>
Index: microsoft-old.nl.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/microsoft-old.nl.html,v
retrieving revision 1.4
retrieving revision 1.5
diff -u -b -r1.4 -r1.5
--- microsoft-old.nl.html 17 Dec 2012 17:57:27 -0000 1.4
+++ microsoft-old.nl.html 8 Apr 2013 05:28:48 -0000 1.5
@@ -7,6 +7,13 @@
<title>Is Microsoft de Duivel? - GNU Project - Free Software Foundation
(FSF)</title>
<!--#include virtual="/server/banner.nl.html" -->
+<!--#set var="PO_FILE"
+ value='<a href="http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/po/microsoft-old.nl.po";>
+ http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/po/microsoft-old.nl.po</a>' -->
+ <!--#set var="ORIGINAL_FILE" value="/philosophy/microsoft-old.html" -->
+ <!--#set var="DIFF_FILE" value="/philosophy/po/microsoft-old.nl-diff.html" -->
+ <!--#set var="OUTDATED_SINCE" value="2013-02-07" -->
+ <!--#include virtual="/server/outdated.nl.html" -->
<!--#include virtual="/philosophy/po/microsoft-old.translist" -->
<h2>Is Microsoft de Duivel?</h2>
@@ -103,7 +110,7 @@
<!-- timestamp start -->
Bijgewerkt:
-$Date: 2012/12/17 17:57:27 $
+$Date: 2013/04/08 05:28:48 $
<!-- timestamp end -->
</p>
Index: po/freedom-or-copyright-old.nl-diff.html
===================================================================
RCS file: po/freedom-or-copyright-old.nl-diff.html
diff -N po/freedom-or-copyright-old.nl-diff.html
--- /dev/null 1 Jan 1970 00:00:00 -0000
+++ po/freedom-or-copyright-old.nl-diff.html 8 Apr 2013 05:28:49 -0000
1.1
@@ -0,0 +1,216 @@
+<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Strict//EN"
+ "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-strict.dtd";>
+<!-- Generated by GNUN -->
+<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"; xml:lang="en" lang="en">
+<head>
+<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8" />
+<title>/philosophy/freedom-or-copyright-old.html-diff</title>
+<style type="text/css">
+span.removed { background-color: #f22; color: #000; }
+span.inserted { background-color: #2f2; color: #000; }
+</style></head>
+<body><pre>
+<!--#include virtual="/server/header.html" -->
+<span class="inserted"><ins><em><!-- Parent-Version: 1.75
--></em></ins></span>
+<title>Freedom—or Copyright? <span class="inserted"><ins><em>(Old
Version)</em></ins></span>
+- GNU Project - Free Software <span class="removed"><del><strong>Foundation
(FSF)</title></strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>Foundation</title></em></ins></span>
+<!--#include <span
class="removed"><del><strong>virtual="/server/banner.html"</strong></del></span>
<span
class="inserted"><ins><em>virtual="/philosophy/po/freedom-or-copyright-old.translist"</em></ins></span>
-->
+<!--#include <span
class="removed"><del><strong>virtual="/philosophy/po/freedom-or-copyright-old.translist"</strong></del></span>
<span
class="inserted"><ins><em>virtual="/server/banner.html"</em></ins></span> -->
+
+<h2>Freedom—or <span
class="removed"><del><strong>Copyright?</h2></strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>Copyright? (Old Version)</h2>
+
+<div class="announcement">
+<blockquote><p>There is an <a
+href="/philosophy/freedom-or-copyright.html"> updated version</a> of
+this article.</p></blockquote>
+</div></em></ins></span>
+
+<p>
+ by <strong>Richard M. Stallman</strong>
+</p>
+
+<blockquote>
+<p>
+The brave new world of e-books: no more used book stores, no more
+lending a book to your friend, no more borrowing one from the public
+library, no purchasing a book except with a credit card that
+identifies what you read. Even reading an e-book without
+authorization is a crime.
+</p>
+</blockquote>
+
+<p>
+Once upon a time, in the age of the printing press, an industrial
+regulation was established for the business of writing and
+publishing. It was called copyright. Copyright's purpose was to
+encourage the publication of a diversity of written
+works. Copyright's method was to make publishers get permission
+from authors to reprint recent writings.</p>
+
+<p>
+Ordinary readers had little reason to disapprove, since copyright
+restricted only publication, not the things a reader could do. If it
+raised the price of a book a small amount, that was only
+money. Copyright provided a public benefit, as intended, with little
+burden on the public. It did its job well—back then.</p>
+
+<p>
+Then a new way of distributing information came about: computers and
+networks. The advantage of digital information technology is that it
+facilitates copying and manipulating information, including software,
+musical recordings and books. Networks offered the possibility of
+unlimited access to all sorts of data—an information utopia.</p>
+
+<p>
+But one obstacle stood in the way: copyright. Readers who made use of
+their computers to share published information were technically
+copyright infringers. The world had changed, and what was once an
+industrial regulation on publishers had become a restriction on the
+public it was meant to serve.</p>
+
+<p>
+In a democracy, a law that prohibits a popular, natural and useful
+activity is usually soon relaxed. But the powerful publishers'
+lobby was determined to prevent the public from taking advantage of
+the power of their computers, and found copyright a suitable
+weapon. Under their influence, rather than relaxing copyright to suit
+the new circumstances, governments made it stricter than ever,
+imposing harsh penalties on readers caught sharing.</p>
+
+<p>
+But that wasn't the last of it. Computers can be powerful tools of
+domination when a few people control what other people's computers
+do. The publishers realized that by forcing people to use specially
+designated software to watch videos and read e-books, they can gain
+unprecedented power: they can compel readers to pay, and identify
+themselves, every time they read a book!</p>
+
+<p>
+That is the publishers' dream, and they prevailed upon the
+U.S. government to enact the Digital Millennium Copyright Act of
+1998. This law gives them total legal power over almost anything a
+reader might do with an e-book, as long as they publish the book in
+encrypted form. Even reading the book without authorization is a
+crime.</p>
+
+<p>
+We still have the same old freedoms in using paper books. But if
+e-books replace printed books, that exception will do little
+good. With “electronic ink”, which makes it possible to
+download new text onto an apparently printed piece of paper, even
+newspapers could become ephemeral. Imagine: no more used book stores;
+no more lending a book to your friend; no more borrowing one from the
+public library—no more “leaks” that might give someone a
+chance to read without paying. (And judging from the ads for Microsoft
+Reader, no more anonymous purchasing of books either.) This is the
+world publishers have in mind for us.</p>
+
+<p>
+Why is there so little public debate about these momentous changes?
+Most citizens have not yet had occasion to come to grips with the
+political issues raised by this futuristic technology. Besides, the
+public has been taught that copyright exists to “protect”
+the copyright holders, with the implication that the public's
+interests do not count. (The biased term
+“<a href="/philosophy/not-ipr.html"> intellectual
+property</a>” also promotes that view; in addition, it
+encourages the mistake of trying to treat several laws that are almost
+totally different—such as copyright law and patent law—as
+if they were a single issue.)</p>
+
+<p>
+But when the public at large begins to use e-books, and discovers the
+regime that the publishers have prepared for them, they will begin to
+resist. Humanity will not accept this yoke forever.</p>
+
+<p>
+The publishers would have us believe that suppressive copyright is the
+only way to keep art alive, but we do not need a War on Copying to
+encourage a diversity of published works; as the Grateful Dead showed,
+private copying among fans is not necessarily a problem for
+artists. (In 2007, Radiohead made millions by inviting fans to copy an
+album and pay whatever amount they wish; a few years before, Stephen King
+got hundreds of thousands for an e-book which people could copy.) By
+legalizing the copying of e-books among friends, we can turn copyright
+back into the industrial regulation it once was.</p>
+
+<p>
+For some kinds of writing, we should go even further. For scholarly
+papers and monographs, everyone should be encouraged to republish them
+verbatim online; this helps protect the scholarly record while making
+it more accessible. For textbooks and most reference works,
+publication of modified versions should be allowed as well, since that
+encourages improvement.</p>
+
+<p>
+Eventually, when computer networks provide an easy way to send someone
+a small amount of money, the whole rationale for restricting verbatim
+copying will go away. If you like a book, and a box pops up on your
+computer saying “Click here to give the author one
+dollar”, wouldn't you click? Copyright for books and music, as
+it applies to distributing verbatim unmodified copies, will be
+entirely obsolete. And not a moment too soon!</p>
+
+<span class="removed"><del><strong></div></strong></del></span>
+<span class="inserted"><ins><em></div><!-- for id="content", starts
in the include above --></em></ins></span>
+<!--#include virtual="/server/footer.html" -->
+<div id="footer">
+<span class="removed"><del><strong><p>
+Please</strong></del></span>
+
+<span class="inserted"><ins><em><p>Please</em></ins></span> send <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>general</em></ins></span> FSF & GNU inquiries to
<a <span
class="removed"><del><strong>href="mailto:address@hidden"><em>address@hidden</em></a>.</strong></del></span>
+<span
class="inserted"><ins><em>href="mailto:address@hidden"><address@hidden></a>.</em></ins></span>
There are also <a
+href="/contact/">other ways to contact</a> the FSF.
+<span class="removed"><del><strong><br />
+Please send broken</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>Broken</em></ins></span> links and other
+corrections or suggestions <span class="inserted"><ins><em>can be
sent</em></ins></span> to <a <span
class="removed"><del><strong>href="mailto:address@hidden"><em>address@hidden</em></a>.
+</p>
+
+<p></strong></del></span>
+<span
class="inserted"><ins><em>href="mailto:address@hidden"><address@hidden></a>.</p>
+
+<p><!-- TRANSLATORS: Ignore the original text in this paragraph,
+ replace it with the translation of these two:
+
+ We work hard and do our best to provide accurate, good quality
+ translations. However, we are not exempt from imperfection.
+ Please send your comments and general suggestions in this regard
+ to <a href="mailto:address@hidden">
+ <address@hidden></a>.</p>
+
+ <p>For information on coordinating and submitting translations of
+ our web pages, see <a
+ href="/server/standards/README.translations.html">Translations
+ README</a>. --></em></ins></span>
+Please see the <a
+href="/server/standards/README.translations.html">Translations
README</a> for
+information on coordinating and submitting translations of this <span
class="removed"><del><strong>article.
+</p>
+
+<p>
+Copyright</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>article.</p>
+
+<p>Copyright</em></ins></span> © 1999, 2008 Richard M. <span
class="removed"><del><strong>Stallman
+<br />
+This</strong></del></span> <span class="inserted"><ins><em>Stallman</p>
+
+<p>This</em></ins></span> page is licensed under a <a rel="license"
+href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/3.0/us/">Creative
+Commons Attribution-NoDerivs 3.0 United States <span
class="removed"><del><strong>License</a>.
+</p>
+
+<p>
+Updated:</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>License</a>.</p>
+
+<!--#include virtual="/server/bottom-notes.html" -->
+
+<p>Updated:</em></ins></span>
+<!-- timestamp start -->
+$Date: 2013/04/08 05:28:49 $
+<!-- timestamp end -->
+</p>
+</div>
+</div>
+</body>
+</html>
+</pre></body></html>
Index: po/microsoft-old.ca-diff.html
===================================================================
RCS file: po/microsoft-old.ca-diff.html
diff -N po/microsoft-old.ca-diff.html
--- /dev/null 1 Jan 1970 00:00:00 -0000
+++ po/microsoft-old.ca-diff.html 8 Apr 2013 05:28:49 -0000 1.1
@@ -0,0 +1,127 @@
+<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Strict//EN"
+ "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-strict.dtd";>
+<!-- Generated by GNUN -->
+<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"; xml:lang="en" lang="en">
+<head>
+<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8" />
+<title>/philosophy/microsoft-old.html-diff</title>
+<style type="text/css">
+span.removed { background-color: #f22; color: #000; }
+span.inserted { background-color: #2f2; color: #000; }
+</style></head>
+<body><pre>
+<!--#include virtual="/server/header.html" -->
+<span class="inserted"><ins><em><!-- Parent-Version: 1.75
--></em></ins></span>
+<title>Is Microsoft the Great Satan? <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>(Old Version)</em></ins></span>
+- GNU Project - Free Software <span class="removed"><del><strong>Foundation
(FSF)</title></strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>Foundation</title></em></ins></span>
+<!--#include <span
class="removed"><del><strong>virtual="/server/banner.html"</strong></del></span>
<span
class="inserted"><ins><em>virtual="/philosophy/po/microsoft-old.translist"</em></ins></span>
-->
+<!--#include <span
class="removed"><del><strong>virtual="/philosophy/po/microsoft-old.translist"</strong></del></span>
<span
class="inserted"><ins><em>virtual="/server/banner.html"</em></ins></span> -->
+<h2>Is Microsoft the Great <span
class="removed"><del><strong>Satan?</h2></strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>Satan? (Old Version)</h2></em></ins></span>
+
+<div class="announcement">
+<blockquote><p>There is an <a
href="/philosophy/microsoft.html">
+updated version</a> of this article.</p></blockquote>
+</div>
+
+<p>Many people think of Microsoft as the monster menace of the software
+industry. There is even a campaign to boycott Microsoft. This feeling
+has intensified since Microsoft expressed active hostility towards
+free software.</p>
+
+<p>In the free software movement, our perspective is different. We see
+that Microsoft is doing something that is bad for software users:
+making software <a
href="/philosophy/categories.html#ProprietarySoftware">
+proprietary</a> and thus denying users their rightful freedom.</p>
+
+<p>But Microsoft is not alone in this; almost all software companies
+do the same thing to the users. If other companies manage to dominate
+fewer users than Microsoft, that is not for lack of trying.</p>
+
+<p>This is not meant to excuse Microsoft. Rather, it is meant as a
+reminder that Microsoft is the natural development of a software
+industry based on <a href="/philosophy/shouldbefree.html">dividing
+users and taking away their freedom</a>. When criticizing Microsoft,
+we must not exonerate the other companies that also make proprietary
+software. At the FSF, we don't run any proprietary software—not
+from Microsoft or anyone else.</p>
+
+<p>In the “Halloween documents”, released at the end of
+October 1998, Microsoft executives stated an intention to use various
+methods to obstruct the development of free software: specifically,
+designing secret protocols and file formats, and patenting algorithms
+and software features.</p>
+
+<p>These obstructionist policies are nothing new: Microsoft, and many
+other software companies, have been doing them for years now. In the
+past, probably, their motivation was to attack each other; now, it
+seems, we are among the intended targets. But that change in
+motivation has no practical consequence, because secret conventions
+and software patents obstruct everyone, regardless of the
+“intended target”.</p>
+
+<p>Secrecy and patents do threaten free software. They have obstructed
+us greatly in the past, and we must expect they will do so even more
+in the future. But this is no different from what was going to happen
+even if Microsoft had never noticed us. The only real significance of
+the “Halloween documents” is that Microsoft seems to think
+that the <a href="/gnu/linux-and-gnu.html">GNU/Linux system</a> has
+the potential for great success.</p>
+
+<p>Thank you, Microsoft, and please get out of the way.</p>
+<span class="removed"><del><strong></div></strong></del></span>
+<span class="inserted"><ins><em></div><!-- for id="content", starts
in the include above --></em></ins></span>
+<!--#include virtual="/server/footer.html" -->
+<div id="footer">
+
+<p>Please send <span class="inserted"><ins><em>general</em></ins></span>
FSF & GNU inquiries to <a
+href="mailto:address@hidden"><address@hidden></a>. There are
also <a
+href="/contact/">other ways to contact</a> the FSF.
+<span class="removed"><del><strong><br />
+Please send broken</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>Broken</em></ins></span> links and other
+corrections or suggestions <span class="inserted"><ins><em>can be
sent</em></ins></span> to <a <span
class="removed"><del><strong>href="mailto:address@hidden"><address@hidden></a>.
+</p>
+
+<p></strong></del></span>
+<span
class="inserted"><ins><em>href="mailto:address@hidden"><address@hidden></a>.</p>
+
+<p><!-- TRANSLATORS: Ignore the original text in this paragraph,
+ replace it with the translation of these two:
+
+ We work hard and do our best to provide accurate, good quality
+ translations. However, we are not exempt from imperfection.
+ Please send your comments and general suggestions in this regard
+ to <a href="mailto:address@hidden">
+ <address@hidden></a>.</p>
+
+ <p>For information on coordinating and submitting translations of
+ our web pages, see <a
+ href="/server/standards/README.translations.html">Translations
+ README</a>. --></em></ins></span>
+Please see the <a
+href="/server/standards/README.translations.html">Translations
README</a> for
+information on coordinating and submitting translations of this <span
class="removed"><del><strong>article.
+</p></strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>article.</p></em></ins></span>
+
+<p>
+Copyright © 1997, 1998, 1999, 2000, 2007, 2008, 2009 Free
+Software Foundation, Inc.</p>
+<p>This page is licensed under a <a rel="license"
+href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/3.0/us/">Creative
+Commons Attribution-NoDerivs 3.0 United States License</a>.
+</p>
+
+<span class="removed"><del><strong><p>
+Updated:</strong></del></span>
+
+<span class="inserted"><ins><em><!--#include
virtual="/server/bottom-notes.html" -->
+
+<p>Updated:</em></ins></span>
+<!-- timestamp start -->
+$Date: 2013/04/08 05:28:49 $
+<!-- timestamp end -->
+</p>
+</div>
+</div>
+</body>
+</html>
+</pre></body></html>
Index: po/microsoft-old.ko-diff.html
===================================================================
RCS file: po/microsoft-old.ko-diff.html
diff -N po/microsoft-old.ko-diff.html
--- /dev/null 1 Jan 1970 00:00:00 -0000
+++ po/microsoft-old.ko-diff.html 8 Apr 2013 05:28:49 -0000 1.1
@@ -0,0 +1,127 @@
+<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Strict//EN"
+ "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-strict.dtd";>
+<!-- Generated by GNUN -->
+<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"; xml:lang="en" lang="en">
+<head>
+<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8" />
+<title>/philosophy/microsoft-old.html-diff</title>
+<style type="text/css">
+span.removed { background-color: #f22; color: #000; }
+span.inserted { background-color: #2f2; color: #000; }
+</style></head>
+<body><pre>
+<!--#include virtual="/server/header.html" -->
+<span class="inserted"><ins><em><!-- Parent-Version: 1.75
--></em></ins></span>
+<title>Is Microsoft the Great Satan? <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>(Old Version)</em></ins></span>
+- GNU Project - Free Software <span class="removed"><del><strong>Foundation
(FSF)</title></strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>Foundation</title></em></ins></span>
+<!--#include <span
class="removed"><del><strong>virtual="/server/banner.html"</strong></del></span>
<span
class="inserted"><ins><em>virtual="/philosophy/po/microsoft-old.translist"</em></ins></span>
-->
+<!--#include <span
class="removed"><del><strong>virtual="/philosophy/po/microsoft-old.translist"</strong></del></span>
<span
class="inserted"><ins><em>virtual="/server/banner.html"</em></ins></span> -->
+<h2>Is Microsoft the Great <span
class="removed"><del><strong>Satan?</h2></strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>Satan? (Old Version)</h2></em></ins></span>
+
+<div class="announcement">
+<blockquote><p>There is an <a
href="/philosophy/microsoft.html">
+updated version</a> of this article.</p></blockquote>
+</div>
+
+<p>Many people think of Microsoft as the monster menace of the software
+industry. There is even a campaign to boycott Microsoft. This feeling
+has intensified since Microsoft expressed active hostility towards
+free software.</p>
+
+<p>In the free software movement, our perspective is different. We see
+that Microsoft is doing something that is bad for software users:
+making software <a
href="/philosophy/categories.html#ProprietarySoftware">
+proprietary</a> and thus denying users their rightful freedom.</p>
+
+<p>But Microsoft is not alone in this; almost all software companies
+do the same thing to the users. If other companies manage to dominate
+fewer users than Microsoft, that is not for lack of trying.</p>
+
+<p>This is not meant to excuse Microsoft. Rather, it is meant as a
+reminder that Microsoft is the natural development of a software
+industry based on <a href="/philosophy/shouldbefree.html">dividing
+users and taking away their freedom</a>. When criticizing Microsoft,
+we must not exonerate the other companies that also make proprietary
+software. At the FSF, we don't run any proprietary software—not
+from Microsoft or anyone else.</p>
+
+<p>In the “Halloween documents”, released at the end of
+October 1998, Microsoft executives stated an intention to use various
+methods to obstruct the development of free software: specifically,
+designing secret protocols and file formats, and patenting algorithms
+and software features.</p>
+
+<p>These obstructionist policies are nothing new: Microsoft, and many
+other software companies, have been doing them for years now. In the
+past, probably, their motivation was to attack each other; now, it
+seems, we are among the intended targets. But that change in
+motivation has no practical consequence, because secret conventions
+and software patents obstruct everyone, regardless of the
+“intended target”.</p>
+
+<p>Secrecy and patents do threaten free software. They have obstructed
+us greatly in the past, and we must expect they will do so even more
+in the future. But this is no different from what was going to happen
+even if Microsoft had never noticed us. The only real significance of
+the “Halloween documents” is that Microsoft seems to think
+that the <a href="/gnu/linux-and-gnu.html">GNU/Linux system</a> has
+the potential for great success.</p>
+
+<p>Thank you, Microsoft, and please get out of the way.</p>
+<span class="removed"><del><strong></div></strong></del></span>
+<span class="inserted"><ins><em></div><!-- for id="content", starts
in the include above --></em></ins></span>
+<!--#include virtual="/server/footer.html" -->
+<div id="footer">
+
+<p>Please send <span class="inserted"><ins><em>general</em></ins></span>
FSF & GNU inquiries to <a
+href="mailto:address@hidden"><address@hidden></a>. There are
also <a
+href="/contact/">other ways to contact</a> the FSF.
+<span class="removed"><del><strong><br />
+Please send broken</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>Broken</em></ins></span> links and other
+corrections or suggestions <span class="inserted"><ins><em>can be
sent</em></ins></span> to <a <span
class="removed"><del><strong>href="mailto:address@hidden"><address@hidden></a>.
+</p>
+
+<p></strong></del></span>
+<span
class="inserted"><ins><em>href="mailto:address@hidden"><address@hidden></a>.</p>
+
+<p><!-- TRANSLATORS: Ignore the original text in this paragraph,
+ replace it with the translation of these two:
+
+ We work hard and do our best to provide accurate, good quality
+ translations. However, we are not exempt from imperfection.
+ Please send your comments and general suggestions in this regard
+ to <a href="mailto:address@hidden">
+ <address@hidden></a>.</p>
+
+ <p>For information on coordinating and submitting translations of
+ our web pages, see <a
+ href="/server/standards/README.translations.html">Translations
+ README</a>. --></em></ins></span>
+Please see the <a
+href="/server/standards/README.translations.html">Translations
README</a> for
+information on coordinating and submitting translations of this <span
class="removed"><del><strong>article.
+</p></strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>article.</p></em></ins></span>
+
+<p>
+Copyright © 1997, 1998, 1999, 2000, 2007, 2008, 2009 Free
+Software Foundation, Inc.</p>
+<p>This page is licensed under a <a rel="license"
+href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/3.0/us/">Creative
+Commons Attribution-NoDerivs 3.0 United States License</a>.
+</p>
+
+<span class="removed"><del><strong><p>
+Updated:</strong></del></span>
+
+<span class="inserted"><ins><em><!--#include
virtual="/server/bottom-notes.html" -->
+
+<p>Updated:</em></ins></span>
+<!-- timestamp start -->
+$Date: 2013/04/08 05:28:49 $
+<!-- timestamp end -->
+</p>
+</div>
+</div>
+</body>
+</html>
+</pre></body></html>
Index: po/microsoft-old.nl-diff.html
===================================================================
RCS file: po/microsoft-old.nl-diff.html
diff -N po/microsoft-old.nl-diff.html
--- /dev/null 1 Jan 1970 00:00:00 -0000
+++ po/microsoft-old.nl-diff.html 8 Apr 2013 05:28:49 -0000 1.1
@@ -0,0 +1,127 @@
+<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Strict//EN"
+ "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-strict.dtd";>
+<!-- Generated by GNUN -->
+<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"; xml:lang="en" lang="en">
+<head>
+<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8" />
+<title>/philosophy/microsoft-old.html-diff</title>
+<style type="text/css">
+span.removed { background-color: #f22; color: #000; }
+span.inserted { background-color: #2f2; color: #000; }
+</style></head>
+<body><pre>
+<!--#include virtual="/server/header.html" -->
+<span class="inserted"><ins><em><!-- Parent-Version: 1.75
--></em></ins></span>
+<title>Is Microsoft the Great Satan? <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>(Old Version)</em></ins></span>
+- GNU Project - Free Software <span class="removed"><del><strong>Foundation
(FSF)</title></strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>Foundation</title></em></ins></span>
+<!--#include <span
class="removed"><del><strong>virtual="/server/banner.html"</strong></del></span>
<span
class="inserted"><ins><em>virtual="/philosophy/po/microsoft-old.translist"</em></ins></span>
-->
+<!--#include <span
class="removed"><del><strong>virtual="/philosophy/po/microsoft-old.translist"</strong></del></span>
<span
class="inserted"><ins><em>virtual="/server/banner.html"</em></ins></span> -->
+<h2>Is Microsoft the Great <span
class="removed"><del><strong>Satan?</h2></strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>Satan? (Old Version)</h2></em></ins></span>
+
+<div class="announcement">
+<blockquote><p>There is an <a
href="/philosophy/microsoft.html">
+updated version</a> of this article.</p></blockquote>
+</div>
+
+<p>Many people think of Microsoft as the monster menace of the software
+industry. There is even a campaign to boycott Microsoft. This feeling
+has intensified since Microsoft expressed active hostility towards
+free software.</p>
+
+<p>In the free software movement, our perspective is different. We see
+that Microsoft is doing something that is bad for software users:
+making software <a
href="/philosophy/categories.html#ProprietarySoftware">
+proprietary</a> and thus denying users their rightful freedom.</p>
+
+<p>But Microsoft is not alone in this; almost all software companies
+do the same thing to the users. If other companies manage to dominate
+fewer users than Microsoft, that is not for lack of trying.</p>
+
+<p>This is not meant to excuse Microsoft. Rather, it is meant as a
+reminder that Microsoft is the natural development of a software
+industry based on <a href="/philosophy/shouldbefree.html">dividing
+users and taking away their freedom</a>. When criticizing Microsoft,
+we must not exonerate the other companies that also make proprietary
+software. At the FSF, we don't run any proprietary software—not
+from Microsoft or anyone else.</p>
+
+<p>In the “Halloween documents”, released at the end of
+October 1998, Microsoft executives stated an intention to use various
+methods to obstruct the development of free software: specifically,
+designing secret protocols and file formats, and patenting algorithms
+and software features.</p>
+
+<p>These obstructionist policies are nothing new: Microsoft, and many
+other software companies, have been doing them for years now. In the
+past, probably, their motivation was to attack each other; now, it
+seems, we are among the intended targets. But that change in
+motivation has no practical consequence, because secret conventions
+and software patents obstruct everyone, regardless of the
+“intended target”.</p>
+
+<p>Secrecy and patents do threaten free software. They have obstructed
+us greatly in the past, and we must expect they will do so even more
+in the future. But this is no different from what was going to happen
+even if Microsoft had never noticed us. The only real significance of
+the “Halloween documents” is that Microsoft seems to think
+that the <a href="/gnu/linux-and-gnu.html">GNU/Linux system</a> has
+the potential for great success.</p>
+
+<p>Thank you, Microsoft, and please get out of the way.</p>
+<span class="removed"><del><strong></div></strong></del></span>
+<span class="inserted"><ins><em></div><!-- for id="content", starts
in the include above --></em></ins></span>
+<!--#include virtual="/server/footer.html" -->
+<div id="footer">
+
+<p>Please send <span class="inserted"><ins><em>general</em></ins></span>
FSF & GNU inquiries to <a
+href="mailto:address@hidden"><address@hidden></a>. There are
also <a
+href="/contact/">other ways to contact</a> the FSF.
+<span class="removed"><del><strong><br />
+Please send broken</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>Broken</em></ins></span> links and other
+corrections or suggestions <span class="inserted"><ins><em>can be
sent</em></ins></span> to <a <span
class="removed"><del><strong>href="mailto:address@hidden"><address@hidden></a>.
+</p>
+
+<p></strong></del></span>
+<span
class="inserted"><ins><em>href="mailto:address@hidden"><address@hidden></a>.</p>
+
+<p><!-- TRANSLATORS: Ignore the original text in this paragraph,
+ replace it with the translation of these two:
+
+ We work hard and do our best to provide accurate, good quality
+ translations. However, we are not exempt from imperfection.
+ Please send your comments and general suggestions in this regard
+ to <a href="mailto:address@hidden">
+ <address@hidden></a>.</p>
+
+ <p>For information on coordinating and submitting translations of
+ our web pages, see <a
+ href="/server/standards/README.translations.html">Translations
+ README</a>. --></em></ins></span>
+Please see the <a
+href="/server/standards/README.translations.html">Translations
README</a> for
+information on coordinating and submitting translations of this <span
class="removed"><del><strong>article.
+</p></strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>article.</p></em></ins></span>
+
+<p>
+Copyright © 1997, 1998, 1999, 2000, 2007, 2008, 2009 Free
+Software Foundation, Inc.</p>
+<p>This page is licensed under a <a rel="license"
+href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/3.0/us/">Creative
+Commons Attribution-NoDerivs 3.0 United States License</a>.
+</p>
+
+<span class="removed"><del><strong><p>
+Updated:</strong></del></span>
+
+<span class="inserted"><ins><em><!--#include
virtual="/server/bottom-notes.html" -->
+
+<p>Updated:</em></ins></span>
+<!-- timestamp start -->
+$Date: 2013/04/08 05:28:49 $
+<!-- timestamp end -->
+</p>
+</div>
+</div>
+</body>
+</html>
+</pre></body></html>
| [Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread] |
- www/philosophy freedom-or-copyright-old.nl.html...,
GNUN <=