[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
www/philosophy/po not-ipr.nl.po
|
From: |
Tom Uijldert |
|
Subject: |
www/philosophy/po not-ipr.nl.po |
|
Date: |
Wed, 19 Dec 2012 19:05:59 +0000 |
CVSROOT: /webcvs/www
Module name: www
Changes by: Tom Uijldert <tuijldert> 12/12/19 19:05:59
Added files:
philosophy/po : not-ipr.nl.po
Log message:
Initial GNUN conversion.
CVSWeb URLs:
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/po/not-ipr.nl.po?cvsroot=www&rev=1.1
Patches:
Index: not-ipr.nl.po
===================================================================
RCS file: not-ipr.nl.po
diff -N not-ipr.nl.po
--- /dev/null 1 Jan 1970 00:00:00 -0000
+++ not-ipr.nl.po 19 Dec 2012 19:05:58 -0000 1.1
@@ -0,0 +1,442 @@
+# Dutch translation of http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/not-ipr.html
+# Copyright (C) YEAR Free Software Foundation, Inc.
+# This file is distributed under the same license as the original article.
+# FIRST AUTHOR <address@hidden>, YEAR.
+#
+msgid ""
+msgstr ""
+"Project-Id-Version: \n"
+"POT-Creation-Date: \n"
+"PO-Revision-Date: \n"
+"Last-Translator: Tom Uijldert <address@hidden>\n"
+"Language-Team: \n"
+"MIME-Version: 1.0\n"
+"Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1\n"
+"Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit\n"
+
+# | Did You Say [-\"Intellectual Property\"?-] {+“Intellectual
+# | Property”?+} It's a Seductive Mirage {+- GNU Project - Free Software
+# | Foundation (FSF)+}
+#. type: Content of: <title>
+#| msgid "Did You Say \"Intellectual Property\"? It's a Seductive Mirage"
+msgid "Did You Say “Intellectual Property”? It's a Seductive
Mirage - GNU Project - Free Software Foundation (FSF)"
+msgstr "Zei U: “Intellectueel Eigendom&rdquo? Dat Is Een Verleidelijke
Luchtspiegeling - GNU Project - Free Software Foundation (FSF)"
+
+# | Did You Say [-\"Intellectual Property\"?-] {+“Intellectual
+# | Property”?+} It's a Seductive Mirage
+#. type: Content of: <h2>
+#| msgid "Did You Say \"Intellectual Property\"? It's a Seductive Mirage"
+msgid "Did You Say “Intellectual Property”? It's a Seductive
Mirage"
+msgstr "Zei U: “Intellectueel Eigendom”? Dat Is Een Verleidelijke
Luchtspiegeling"
+
+# || No change detected. The change might only be in amounts of spaces.
+#. type: Content of: <p>
+#| msgid "by <a href=\"http://www.stallman.org/\";>Richard M. Stallman</a>"
+msgid "by <a href=\"http://www.stallman.org/\";>Richard M. Stallman</a>"
+msgstr "door <a href=\"http://www.stallman.org/\";>Richard M. Stallman</a>"
+
+# | It has become fashionable to toss copyright, patents, and [-trademarks -
+# | three-] {+trademarks—three+} separate and different entities
+# | involving three separate and different sets of {+laws—plus a dozen
+# | other+} laws [----] into one pot and call it [-\"intellectual
+# | property\".-] {+“intellectual property”.+} The distorting and
+# | confusing term did not [-arise-] {+become common+} by accident. Companies
+# | that gain from the confusion promoted it. The clearest way out of the
+# | confusion is to reject the term entirely.
+#. type: Content of: <p>
+#| msgid ""
+#| "It has become fashionable to toss copyright, patents, and trademarks - "
+#| "three separate and different entities involving three separate and "
+#| "different sets of laws -- into one pot and call it \"intellectual property"
+#| "\". The distorting and confusing term did not arise by accident. "
+#| "Companies that gain from the confusion promoted it. The clearest way out "
+#| "of the confusion is to reject the term entirely."
+msgid "It has become fashionable to toss copyright, patents, and
trademarks—three separate and different entities involving three separate
and different sets of laws—plus a dozen other laws into one pot and call
it “intellectual property”. The distorting and confusing term did
not become common by accident. Companies that gain from the confusion promoted
it. The clearest way out of the confusion is to reject the term entirely."
+msgstr "Het is tegenwoordig modieus om de begrippen auteursrecht, patentrecht
en handelsmerken — drie verschillende begrippen met daarbijbehorende
verschillende wetgeving — op één hoop te gooien onder de
noemer “intellectueel eigendom” Deze verwarrende en misleidende
term is niet toevallig ontstaan. Bedrijven die baat hebben bij deze verwarring
bevorderen het gebruik ervan. De eenvoudigste manier om dit tegen te gaan is om
de term volledig af te wijzen."
+
+# | According to Professor Mark Lemley, now of the Stanford Law School, the
+# | widespread use of the term [-\"intellectual property\"-]
+# | {+“intellectual property”+} is a [-fad-] {+fashion+} that
+# | followed the 1967 founding of the World [-\"Intellectual Property\"
+# | Organization,-] {+“Intellectual Property” Organization
+# | (WIPO),+} and only became really common in recent years. (WIPO is formally
+# | a UN organization, but in fact represents the interests of the holders of
+# | copyrights, patents, and trademarks.) {+Wide use dates from <a
+# |
href=\"http://ngrams.googlelabs.com/graph?content=intellectual+property&year_start=1800&year_end=2008&corpus=0&smoothing=1\";>around
+# | 1990</a>. (<a href=\"/graphics/seductivemirage.png\">Local image
+# | copy</a>)+}
+#. type: Content of: <p>
+#| msgid ""
+#| "According to Professor Mark Lemley, now of the Stanford Law School, the "
+#| "widespread use of the term \"intellectual property\" is a fad that "
+#| "followed the 1967 founding of the World \"Intellectual Property\" "
+#| "Organization, and only became really common in recent years. (WIPO is "
+#| "formally a UN organization, but in fact represents the interests of the "
+#| "holders of copyrights, patents, and trademarks.)"
+msgid "According to Professor Mark Lemley, now of the Stanford Law School, the
widespread use of the term “intellectual property” is a fashion
that followed the 1967 founding of the World “Intellectual
Property” Organization (WIPO), and only became really common in recent
years. (WIPO is formally a UN organization, but in fact represents the
interests of the holders of copyrights, patents, and trademarks.) Wide use
dates from <a
href=\"http://ngrams.googlelabs.com/graph?content=intellectual+property&year_start=1800&year_end=2008&corpus=0&smoothing=1\";>around
1990</a>. (<a href=\"/graphics/seductivemirage.png\">Local image copy</a>)"
+msgstr "Volgens professor Mark Lemley, tegenwoordig van de Stanford Law
School, begon de term in de mode te komen na de stichting in 1967 van de World
“Intellectual Property” Organization en werd pas recent echt
gemeengoed (WIPO is formeel een organisatie van de VN maar vertegenwoordigd
feitelijk de belangen van houders van patenten, auteursrechten en
handelsmerken). Algemeen gebruik van de term begon <a
href=\"http://ngrams.googlelabs.com/graph?content=intellectual+property&year_start=1800&year_end=2008&corpus=0&smoothing=1\";>rond
1990</a>. (<a href=\"/graphics/seductivemirage.png\">Local image copy</a>)"
+
+# | The term carries a bias that is not hard to see: it suggests thinking
+# | about copyright, patents and trademarks by analogy with property rights
+# | for physical objects. (This analogy is at odds with the legal philosophies
+# | of copyright law, of patent law, and of trademark law, but only
+# | specialists know that.) These laws are in fact not much like physical
+# | property law, but use of this term leads legislators to change them to be
+# | more so. Since that is the change desired by the companies that exercise
+# | copyright, patent and trademark powers, the bias [-of \"intellectual
+# | property\"-] {+introduced by the term “intellectual
+# | property”+} suits them.
+#. type: Content of: <p>
+#| msgid ""
+#| "The term carries a bias that is not hard to see: it suggests thinking "
+#| "about copyright, patents and trademarks by analogy with property rights "
+#| "for physical objects. (This analogy is at odds with the legal "
+#| "philosophies of copyright law, of patent law, and of trademark law, but "
+#| "only specialists know that.) These laws are in fact not much like "
+#| "physical property law, but use of this term leads legislators to change "
+#| "them to be more so. Since that is the change desired by the companies "
+#| "that exercise copyright, patent and trademark powers, the bias of "
+#| "\"intellectual property\" suits them."
+msgid "The term carries a bias that is not hard to see: it suggests thinking
about copyright, patents and trademarks by analogy with property rights for
physical objects. (This analogy is at odds with the legal philosophies of
copyright law, of patent law, and of trademark law, but only specialists know
that.) These laws are in fact not much like physical property law, but use of
this term leads legislators to change them to be more so. Since that is the
change desired by the companies that exercise copyright, patent and trademark
powers, the bias introduced by the term “intellectual property”
suits them."
+msgstr "De uitdrukking bevat een duidelijk vooroordeel: het suggereert dat
auteursrecht, patentrecht en handelsmerken bijna hetzelfde is als
eigendomsrechten op vaste objecten (Deze analogie is in tegenspraak met het
juridische denken over auteursrechten, patenten en handelsmerken, maar alleen
specialisten weten dat). Deze wetten lijken helemaal niet op eigendomsrecht
maar het gebruik van deze uitdrukking verleid wetgevers om er wél zo
over te denken en wetten dus navenant aan te passen. Aangezien bedrijven die
auteursrechten, patenten en handelsmerken hebben dit juist willen, komt het
ingebakken vooroordeel in de uitdrukking “intellectueel eigendom”
hen goed van pas."
+
+# | The bias is [-enough-] reason {+enough+} to reject the term, and people
+# | have often asked me to propose some other name for the overall [-category
+# | -- or-] {+category—or+} have proposed their own alternatives (often
+# | humorous). Suggestions include IMPs, for Imposed Monopoly Privileges, and
+# | GOLEMs, for Government-Originated Legally Enforced Monopolies. Some speak
+# | of [-\"exclusive-] {+“exclusive+} rights [-regimes\",-]
+# | {+regimes”,+} but referring to restrictions as [-\"rights\"-]
+# | {+“rights”+} is doublethink too.
+#. type: Content of: <p>
+#| msgid ""
+#| "The bias is enough reason to reject the term, and people have often asked "
+#| "me to propose some other name for the overall category -- or have "
+#| "proposed their own alternatives (often humorous). Suggestions include "
+#| "IMPs, for Imposed Monopoly Privileges, and GOLEMs, for Government-"
+#| "Originated Legally Enforced Monopolies. Some speak of \"exclusive rights "
+#| "regimes\", but referring to restrictions as \"rights\" is doublethink too."
+msgid "The bias is reason enough to reject the term, and people have often
asked me to propose some other name for the overall category—or have
proposed their own alternatives (often humorous). Suggestions include IMPs,
for Imposed Monopoly Privileges, and GOLEMs, for Government-Originated Legally
Enforced Monopolies. Some speak of “exclusive rights regimes”, but
referring to restrictions as “rights” is doublethink too."
+msgstr "Dit vooroordeel is voldoende om de uitdrukking af te keuren en mensen
hebben me vaak gevraagd een andere naam te bedenken voor de hele categorie
-— of kwamen zelfs met eigen (vaak geestige) suggesties. Zoals IMPs voor
Imposed Monopoly Privileges (opgedrongen monopolie voorrechten) en GOLEMs voor
Government-Originated Legally Enforced Monopolies (van overheidswege
gelegaliseerde monopolies). Sommigen hebben het over “exclusieve rechten
regimes” maar verwijzen naar beperkingen als zijnde “rechten”
klopt ook niet."
+
+# | Some of these alternative names would be an improvement, but it is a
+# | mistake to replace [-\"intellectual property\"-] {+“intellectual
+# | property”+} with any other term. A different name will not address
+# | the term's deeper problem: overgeneralization. There is no such unified
+# | thing as [-\"intellectual property\"--it-] {+“intellectual
+# | property”—it+} is a mirage. The only reason people think it
+# | makes sense as a coherent category is that widespread use of the term
+# | [-gives that impression.-] {+has misled them.+}
+#. type: Content of: <p>
+#| msgid ""
+#| "Some of these alternative names would be an improvement, but it is a "
+#| "mistake to replace \"intellectual property\" with any other term. A "
+#| "different name will not address the term's deeper problem: "
+#| "overgeneralization. There is no such unified thing as \"intellectual "
+#| "property\"--it is a mirage. The only reason people think it makes sense "
+#| "as a coherent category is that widespread use of the term gives that "
+#| "impression."
+msgid "Some of these alternative names would be an improvement, but it is a
mistake to replace “intellectual property” with any other term. A
different name will not address the term's deeper problem: overgeneralization.
There is no such unified thing as “intellectual property”—it
is a mirage. The only reason people think it makes sense as a coherent
category is that widespread use of the term has misled them."
+msgstr "Sommige van de alternatieve uitdrukkingen zouden zeker een verbetering
zijn maar het is een vergissing om de term “intellectueel eigendom”
te willen vervangen. Een andere uitdrukking is geen oplossing voor het dieper
liggende probleem, dat van een teveel aan generaliseren. Er bestaat geen
universeel iets als “intellectueel eigendom”—het is een
luchtspiegeling. De enige reden waarom mensen denken dat het een samenhangend
geheel is is het wijd verbreidde gebruik van de uitdrukking die tot deze indruk
leidt."
+
+# | The term [-\"intellectual property\"-] {+“intellectual
+# | property”+} is at best a catch-all to lump together disparate laws.
+# | Non[---]lawyers who hear one term applied to these various laws tend to
+# | assume they are based on a common principle[-,-] and function similarly.
+#. type: Content of: <p>
+#| msgid ""
+#| "The term \"intellectual property\" is at best a catch-all to lump "
+#| "together disparate laws. Non-lawyers who hear one term applied to these "
+#| "various laws tend to assume they are based on a common principle, and "
+#| "function similarly."
+msgid "The term “intellectual property” is at best a catch-all to
lump together disparate laws. Nonlawyers who hear one term applied to these
various laws tend to assume they are based on a common principle and function
similarly."
+msgstr "De term “intellectueel eigendom” is op zijn best een
omsluiting van meerdere wetten die niets met elkaar te maken hebben.
Niet-juristen die de uitdrukking toegepast zien op deze diverse wetten hebben
de neiging aan te nemen dat ze gebaseerd zijn op hetzelfde principe en
hetzelfde werken."
+
+# || No change detected. The change might only be in amounts of spaces.
+#. type: Content of: <p>
+#| msgid ""
+#| "Nothing could be further from the case. These laws originated "
+#| "separately, evolved differently, cover different activities, have "
+#| "different rules, and raise different public policy issues."
+msgid "Nothing could be further from the case. These laws originated
separately, evolved differently, cover different activities, have different
rules, and raise different public policy issues."
+msgstr "Niets is minder waar. Deze wetten hebben een eigen
ontstaansgeschiedenis, zijn langs aparte wegen geëvolueerd, gaan over
verschillende aktiviteiten, hebben andere regels en hebben betrekking op
verschillend openbaar beleid."
+
+# | Copyright law was designed to promote authorship and art, and covers the
+# | details of expression of a work. Patent law was intended to promote the
+# | publication of useful ideas, at the price of giving the one who publishes
+# | an idea a temporary monopoly over [-it--a-] {+it—a+} price that may
+# | be worth paying in some fields and not in others.
+#. type: Content of: <p>
+#| msgid ""
+#| "Copyright law was designed to promote authorship and art, and covers the "
+#| "details of expression of a work. Patent law was intended to promote the "
+#| "publication of useful ideas, at the price of giving the one who publishes "
+#| "an idea a temporary monopoly over it--a price that may be worth paying in "
+#| "some fields and not in others."
+msgid "Copyright law was designed to promote authorship and art, and covers
the details of expression of a work. Patent law was intended to promote the
publication of useful ideas, at the price of giving the one who publishes an
idea a temporary monopoly over it—a price that may be worth paying in
some fields and not in others."
+msgstr "Het auteursrecht was in het leven geroepen om het schrijven en de
kunsten te bevorderen en regelt de verschijningsvorm van een werk. Het
patentrecht had tot doel het publiceren van nuttige ideeën te bevorderen,
met als tegenprestatie een tijdelijk monopolie op het idee voor de bedenker
— een prijs die het waard is betaald te worden op sommige gebieden maar
bij anderen weer niet."
+
+# | Trademark law, by contrast, was not intended to promote any particular way
+# | of acting, but simply to enable buyers to know what they are buying.
+# | Legislators under the influence of [-\"intellectual property\",-] {+the
+# | term “intellectual property”,+} however, have turned it into a
+# | scheme that provides incentives for advertising.
+#. type: Content of: <p>
+#| msgid ""
+#| "Trademark law, by contrast, was not intended to promote any particular "
+#| "way of acting, but simply to enable buyers to know what they are buying. "
+#| "Legislators under the influence of \"intellectual property\", however, "
+#| "have turned it into a scheme that provides incentives for advertising."
+msgid "Trademark law, by contrast, was not intended to promote any particular
way of acting, but simply to enable buyers to know what they are buying.
Legislators under the influence of the term “intellectual
property”, however, have turned it into a scheme that provides incentives
for advertising."
+msgstr "In tegestelling hiermee was het handelsmerk nooit bedoeld om bepaalde
akties te bevorderen maar gewoon om kopers te laten weten wat ze eigenlijk
kochten. Wetgevers, onder invloed van het begrip “intellectueel
eigendom”, hebben dit echter verdraaid naar een aanmoediging voor het
maken van reclame."
+
+# || No change detected. The change might only be in amounts of spaces.
+#. type: Content of: <p>
+#| msgid ""
+#| "Since these laws developed independently, they are different in every "
+#| "detail, as well as in their basic purposes and methods. Thus, if you "
+#| "learn some fact about copyright law, you'd be wise to assume that patent "
+#| "law is different. You'll rarely go wrong!"
+msgid "Since these laws developed independently, they are different in every
detail, as well as in their basic purposes and methods. Thus, if you learn
some fact about copyright law, you'd be wise to assume that patent law is
different. You'll rarely go wrong!"
+msgstr "Aangezien deze wetten onafhankelijk van elkaar zijn ontstaan,
verschillen ze op allerlei punten, zo ook op hun uitgangspunten. Als je dus
iets weet over auteursrecht kun je maar beter aannemen dat dit niét in
patentrecht voorkomt. Je zult het zelden verkeerd hebben!"
+
+# | People often say [-\"intellectual property\"-] {+“intellectual
+# | property”+} when they really mean some larger or smaller category.
+# | For instance, rich countries often impose unjust laws on poor countries to
+# | squeeze money out of them. Some of these laws are [-\"intellectual
+# | property\"-] {+“intellectual property”+} laws, and others are
+# | not; nonetheless, critics of the practice often grab for that label
+# | because it has become familiar to them. By using it, they misrepresent
+# | the nature of the issue. It would be better to use an accurate term, such
+# | as [-\"legislative colonization\",-] {+“legislative
+# | colonization”,+} that gets to the heart of the matter.
+#. type: Content of: <p>
+#| msgid ""
+#| "People often say \"intellectual property\" when they really mean some "
+#| "larger or smaller category. For instance, rich countries often impose "
+#| "unjust laws on poor countries to squeeze money out of them. Some of these "
+#| "laws are \"intellectual property\" laws, and others are not; nonetheless, "
+#| "critics of the practice often grab for that label because it has become "
+#| "familiar to them. By using it, they misrepresent the nature of the issue. "
+#| "It would be better to use an accurate term, such as \"legislative "
+#| "colonization\", that gets to the heart of the matter."
+msgid "People often say “intellectual property” when they really
mean some larger or smaller category. For instance, rich countries often
impose unjust laws on poor countries to squeeze money out of them. Some of
these laws are “intellectual property” laws, and others are not;
nonetheless, critics of the practice often grab for that label because it has
become familiar to them. By using it, they misrepresent the nature of the
issue. It would be better to use an accurate term, such as “legislative
colonization”, that gets to the heart of the matter."
+msgstr "Mensen misbruiken vaak de uitdrukking “intellectueel
eigendom” voor een veel breder begrip, of iets veel specifiekers. Rijke
landen bijvoorbeeld leggen vaak oneerlijke wetten op aan arme landen om daar
geld aan te kunnen verdienen. Sommige van deze wetten gaan over
“intellectueel eigendom”, en anderen niet; niettemin grijpen
critici van deze praktijken vaak naar dit begrip omdat het bekend is. Deze term
dekt echter niet de lading en het zou beter zijn om iets passenders te
gebruiken zoals “koloniserende wetgeving”, wat precies zegt waar
het op staat."
+
+# | Laymen are not alone in being confused by this term. Even law professors
+# | who teach these laws are lured [-by,-] and distracted by[-,-] the
+# | seductiveness of the term [-\"intellectual property\",-]
+# | {+“intellectual property”,+} and make general statements that
+# | conflict with facts they know. For example, one professor wrote in 2006:
+#. type: Content of: <p>
+#| msgid ""
+#| "Laymen are not alone in being confused by this term. Even law professors "
+#| "who teach these laws are lured by, and distracted by, the seductiveness "
+#| "of the term \"intellectual property\", and make general statements that "
+#| "conflict with facts they know. For example, one professor wrote in 2006:"
+msgid "Laymen are not alone in being confused by this term. Even law
professors who teach these laws are lured and distracted by the seductiveness
of the term “intellectual property”, and make general statements
that conflict with facts they know. For example, one professor wrote in 2006:"
+msgstr "Het zijn niet alleen leken die dit verwarren. Zelfs professoren in de
rechten, die deze wetten onderwijzen, worden door de uitdrukking
“intellectueel eigendom” verleid en afgeleid en doen daardoor
uitspraken die tegen de feiten in gaan, hoewel ze die feiten dus kennen.
Bijvoorbeeld in 2006 schreef een professor:"
+
+# | [-\"Unlike-]{+Unlike+} their descendants who now work the floor at WIPO,
+# | the framers of the US constitution had a principled, pro[---]competitive
+# | attitude to intellectual property. They knew rights might be necessary,
+# | [-but...they-] {+but…they+} tied congress's hands, restricting its
+# | power in multiple [-ways\".-] {+ways.+}
+#. type: Content of: <blockquote><p>
+#| msgid ""
+#| "\"Unlike their descendants who now work the floor at WIPO, the framers of "
+#| "the US constitution had a principled, pro-competitive attitude to "
+#| "intellectual property. They knew rights might be necessary, but...they "
+#| "tied congress's hands, restricting its power in multiple ways\"."
+msgid "Unlike their descendants who now work the floor at WIPO, the framers of
the US constitution had a principled, procompetitive attitude to intellectual
property. They knew rights might be necessary, but…they tied congress's
hands, restricting its power in multiple ways."
+msgstr "“In tegenstelling tot hun nazaten, die nu de WIPO bevolken,
hadden de grondleggers van de amerikaanse grondwet een principiële en
concurrentie—gezinde houding ten opzichte van intellectueel eigendom. Ze
wisten dat er wellicht rechten nodig waren maar…ze beperkten het congres
en dus zijn macht op meerdere wijzen”."
+
+# | That statement refers to [-the article 1 section-] {+Article 1, Section+}
+# | 8, [-c-]{+C+}lause 8 [-in-] {+of+} the US Constitution, which authorizes
+# | copyright law and patent law. That clause, though, has nothing to do with
+# | trademark [-law.-] {+law or various others.+} The term [-\"intellectual
+# | property\"-] {+“intellectual property”+} led that professor
+# | [-into a-] {+to make+} false generalization.
+#. type: Content of: <p>
+#| msgid ""
+#| "That statement refers to the article 1 section 8, clause 8 in the US "
+#| "Constitution, which authorizes copyright law and patent law. That clause, "
+#| "though, has nothing to do with trademark law. The term \"intellectual "
+#| "property\" led that professor into a false generalization."
+msgid "That statement refers to Article 1, Section 8, Clause 8 of the US
Constitution, which authorizes copyright law and patent law. That clause,
though, has nothing to do with trademark law or various others. The term
“intellectual property” led that professor to make false
generalization."
+msgstr "Deze uitspraak slaat op artikel 1, sectie 8, sub 8 van de amerikaanse
grondwet, die auteursrecht en patentrecht toestaat. Deze clausule heeft echter
niets te maken met handelsmerken. De uitdrukking “intellectueel
eigendom” leidde tot deze foute veralgemenisering van de professor."
+
+# | The term [-\"intellectual property\"-] {+“intellectual
+# | property”+} also leads to simplistic thinking. It leads people to
+# | focus on the meager commonality in form that these disparate laws
+# | [-have--that-] {+have—that+} they create artificial privileges for
+# | certain [-parties--and-] {+parties—and+} to disregard the details
+# | which form their substance: the specific restrictions each law places on
+# | the public, and the consequences that result. This simplistic focus on
+# | the form encourages an [-\"economistic\"-] {+“economistic”+}
+# | approach to all these issues.
+#. type: Content of: <p>
+#| msgid ""
+#| "The term \"intellectual property\" also leads to simplistic thinking. It "
+#| "leads people to focus on the meager commonality in form that these "
+#| "disparate laws have--that they create artificial privileges for certain "
+#| "parties--and to disregard the details which form their substance: the "
+#| "specific restrictions each law places on the public, and the consequences "
+#| "that result. This simplistic focus on the form encourages an \"economistic"
+#| "\" approach to all these issues."
+msgid "The term “intellectual property” also leads to simplistic
thinking. It leads people to focus on the meager commonality in form that
these disparate laws have—that they create artificial privileges for
certain parties—and to disregard the details which form their substance:
the specific restrictions each law places on the public, and the consequences
that result. This simplistic focus on the form encourages an
“economistic” approach to all these issues."
+msgstr "De uitdrukking “intellectueel eigendom” leid ook tot
té simpel denken. Het legt de nadruk op die ene kleine eigenschap die de
wetten gemeen hebben — dat ze kunstmatige rechten verlenen aan bepaalde
partijen — en negeert de verdere details waaruit die wetten bestaan: de
precieze beperkingen die iedere wet oplegt aan de gemeenschap en de gevolgen
hiervan. Dit simplistische blindstaren werkt een “economische” kijk
op dit alles in de hand."
+
+# | Economics operates here, as it often does, as a vehicle for unexamined
+# | assumptions. These include assumptions about values, such as that amount
+# | of production matters[-,-] while freedom and way of life do not, and
+# | factual assumptions which are mostly false, such as that copyrights on
+# | music supports musicians, or that patents on drugs support life-saving
+# | research.
+#. type: Content of: <p>
+#| msgid ""
+#| "Economics operates here, as it often does, as a vehicle for unexamined "
+#| "assumptions. These include assumptions about values, such as that amount "
+#| "of production matters, while freedom and way of life do not, and factual "
+#| "assumptions which are mostly false, such as that copyrights on music "
+#| "supports musicians, or that patents on drugs support life-saving research."
+msgid "Economics operates here, as it often does, as a vehicle for unexamined
assumptions. These include assumptions about values, such as that amount of
production matters while freedom and way of life do not, and factual
assumptions which are mostly false, such as that copyrights on music supports
musicians, or that patents on drugs support life-saving research."
+msgstr "Deze economische kijk werkt, zoals zo vaak, ondoordachte aannames in
de hand. Onder ander aannames over normen en waarden zoals de aanname dat
alleen de hoeveelheid productie van belang is en vrijheid of levensovertuiging
niet, en feitelijke aannames die niet kloppen zoals dat het auteursrecht bij
muziek er is voor de muzikanten of de aanname dat patenten op geneesmiddelen
onontbeerlijk zijn voor de voortgang van levensreddend onderzoek op dit gebied."
+
+# | Another problem is that, at the broad scale [-of \"intellectual
+# | property\",-] {+implicit in the term “intellectual
+# | property”,+} the specific issues raised by the various laws become
+# | nearly invisible. These issues arise from the specifics of each
+# | [-law--precisely-] {+law—precisely+} what the term [-\"intellectual
+# | property\"-] {+“intellectual property”+} encourages people to
+# | ignore. For instance, one issue relating to copyright law is whether
+# | music sharing should be [-allowed. Patent-] {+allowed; patent+} law has
+# | nothing to do with this. Patent law raises issues such as whether poor
+# | countries should be allowed to produce life-saving drugs and sell them
+# | cheaply to save [-lives. Copyright-] {+lives; copyright+} law has nothing
+# | to do with such matters.
+#. type: Content of: <p>
+#| msgid ""
+#| "Another problem is that, at the broad scale of \"intellectual property\", "
+#| "the specific issues raised by the various laws become nearly invisible. "
+#| "These issues arise from the specifics of each law--precisely what the "
+#| "term \"intellectual property\" encourages people to ignore. For instance, "
+#| "one issue relating to copyright law is whether music sharing should be "
+#| "allowed. Patent law has nothing to do with this. Patent law raises "
+#| "issues such as whether poor countries should be allowed to produce life-"
+#| "saving drugs and sell them cheaply to save lives. Copyright law has "
+#| "nothing to do with such matters."
+msgid "Another problem is that, at the broad scale implicit in the term
“intellectual property”, the specific issues raised by the various
laws become nearly invisible. These issues arise from the specifics of each
law—precisely what the term “intellectual property”
encourages people to ignore. For instance, one issue relating to copyright law
is whether music sharing should be allowed; patent law has nothing to do with
this. Patent law raises issues such as whether poor countries should be
allowed to produce life-saving drugs and sell them cheaply to save lives;
copyright law has nothing to do with such matters."
+msgstr "De term “intellectueel eigendom” is dusdanig algemeen dat
het als het ware specifieke eigenschappen van de diverse wetten ondersneeuwd.
Dit soort eigenschappen volgen uit de details van iedere wet — exact
datgene wat met het gebruik van de term “intellectueel eigendom”
mensen aanzet tot het negeren daarvan. Een discussiepunt dat te maken heeft met
het auteursrecht bijvoorbeeld is of het delen van muziek verboden zou moeten
worden of niet. Het patentrecht heeft daar niets mee te maken. Binnen het
patentrecht wordt gediscusieerd over of arme landen zelf vitale medicijnen
goedkoop zouden mogen produceren om zo levens te redden. Het auteursrecht heeft
daar niets mee te maken."
+
+# | Neither of these issues is solely economic in nature, [-but they are not
+# | similar,-] and [-anyone looking at them in-] {+their noneconomic aspects
+# | are very different; using+} the shallow economic [-perspectives of-]
+# | overgeneralization [-cannot grasp-] {+as the basis for considering them
+# | means ignoring+} the differences. [-If you put both-] {+Putting the
+# | two+} laws in the [-general \"intellectual property\" pot, you will find
+# | that-] {+“intellectual property” pot+} obstructs [-your
+# | ability to think clearly-] {+clear thinking+} about each one.
+#. type: Content of: <p>
+#| msgid ""
+#| "Neither of these issues is solely economic in nature, but they are not "
+#| "similar, and anyone looking at them in the shallow economic perspectives "
+#| "of overgeneralization cannot grasp the differences. If you put both laws "
+#| "in the general \"intellectual property\" pot, you will find that "
+#| "obstructs your ability to think clearly about each one."
+msgid "Neither of these issues is solely economic in nature, and their
noneconomic aspects are very different; using the shallow economic
overgeneralization as the basis for considering them means ignoring the
differences. Putting the two laws in the “intellectual property”
pot obstructs clear thinking about each one."
+msgstr "Geen van deze geschilpunten heeft alleen een economische invalshoek,
maar ze hebben ook weinig gemeenschappelijk. Maar iedereen die er met een
oppervlakkige economische blik naar kijkt zal het verschil ontgaan. Wanneer je
dit vervolgens rangschikt onder één noemer, “intellectueel
eigendom”, dan zul je merken dat je daardoor moeilijker over ieder
probleem apart kunt nadenken."
+
+# | [-As a result,-]{+Thus,+} any opinions about [-\"the-] {+“the+}
+# | issue of intellectual [-property\"-] {+property”+} and any
+# | generalizations about this supposed category are almost surely foolish.
+# | If you think all those laws are one issue, you will tend to choose your
+# | opinions from a selection of sweeping overgeneralizations, none of which
+# | is any good.
+#. type: Content of: <p>
+#| msgid ""
+#| "As a result, any opinions about \"the issue of intellectual property\" "
+#| "and any generalizations about this supposed category are almost surely "
+#| "foolish. If you think all those laws are one issue, you will tend to "
+#| "choose your opinions from a selection of sweeping overgeneralizations, "
+#| "none of which is any good."
+msgid "Thus, any opinions about “the issue of intellectual
property” and any generalizations about this supposed category are almost
surely foolish. If you think all those laws are one issue, you will tend to
choose your opinions from a selection of sweeping overgeneralizations, none of
which is any good."
+msgstr "En dus is ieder standpunt over “het probleem intellectueel
eigendom” en iedere generalisatie bij voorbaat al niet goed doordacht.
Wanneer je ervan uit gaat dat al deze wetten hetzelfde probleemgebied
behandelen zul je je mening dus baseren op een veel te vereenvoudigd standpunt
en dat is nooit goed."
+
+# | If you want to think clearly about the issues raised by patents, or
+# | copyrights, or trademarks, {+or various other different laws,+} the first
+# | step is to forget the idea of lumping them together, and treat them as
+# | separate topics. The second step is to reject the narrow perspectives and
+# | simplistic picture the term [-\"intellectual property\"-]
+# | {+“intellectual property”+} suggests. Consider each of these
+# | issues separately, in its fullness, and you have a chance of considering
+# | them well.
+#. type: Content of: <p>
+#| msgid ""
+#| "If you want to think clearly about the issues raised by patents, or "
+#| "copyrights, or trademarks, the first step is to forget the idea of "
+#| "lumping them together, and treat them as separate topics. The second step "
+#| "is to reject the narrow perspectives and simplistic picture the term "
+#| "\"intellectual property\" suggests. Consider each of these issues "
+#| "separately, in its fullness, and you have a chance of considering them "
+#| "well."
+msgid "If you want to think clearly about the issues raised by patents, or
copyrights, or trademarks, or various other different laws, the first step is
to forget the idea of lumping them together, and treat them as separate topics.
The second step is to reject the narrow perspectives and simplistic picture
the term “intellectual property” suggests. Consider each of these
issues separately, in its fullness, and you have a chance of considering them
well."
+msgstr "Als je je een gefundeerde mening wilt vormen bij discussies over
patenten, auteursrecht of merkenrecht dan moet je om te beginnen de drie niet
op één hoop gooien. Ten tweede moet je het starre denkbeeld wat
“intellectueel eigendom” oproept vergeten. Behandel de diverse
gebieden apart en je hebt een kans dat je de juiste afwegingen maakt."
+
+# | And when it comes to reforming WIPO, [-among other things-] {+here is+} <a
+# | [-href=\"http://www.fsfeurope.org/documents/wiwo.html\";>let's call-]
+# | {+href=\"http://fsfe.org/projects/wipo/wiwo.en.html\";>one proposal+} for
+# | changing [-its name</a>.-] {+the name and substance of WIPO</a>.+}
+#. type: Content of: <p>
+#| msgid ""
+#| "And when it comes to reforming WIPO, among other things <a href=\"http://";
+#| "www.fsfeurope.org/documents/wiwo.html\">let's call for changing its name</"
+#| "a>."
+msgid "And when it comes to reforming WIPO, here is <a
href=\"http://fsfe.org/projects/wipo/wiwo.en.html\";>one proposal for changing
the name and substance of WIPO</a>."
+msgstr "En wat het veranderen van het WIPO betreft, hier een <a
href=\"http://fsfe.org/projects/wipo/wiwo.en.html\";>voorstel tot naamswijziging
en invulling van het instituut</a>."
+
+#. TRANSLATORS: Use space (SPC) as msgstr if you don't have notes.
+#. type: Content of: <div>
+msgid "*GNUN-SLOT: TRANSLATOR'S NOTES*"
+msgstr " "
+
+# type: Content of: <div><p>
+#. type: Content of: <div><p>
+msgid "Please send FSF & GNU inquiries to <a
href=\"mailto:address@hidden";><em>address@hidden</em></a>. There are also <a
href=\"/contact/\">other ways to contact</a> the FSF."
+msgstr "Gelieve vragen over FSF & GNU te sturen naar <a
href=\"mailto:address@hidden";><em>address@hidden</em></a>. Er zijn ook nog <a
href=\"/contact/\">andere manieren om in contact te komen</a> met de FSF."
+
+# type: Content of: <div><p>
+#. type: Content of: <div><p>
+msgid "Please send broken links and other corrections or suggestions to <a
href=\"mailto:address@hidden";><em>address@hidden</em></a>."
+msgstr "Gelieve meldingen van verkeerde links en andere verbeteringen (of
suggesties) te sturen aan: <a
href=\"mailto:address@hidden";><em>address@hidden</em></a>."
+
+# || No change detected. The change might only be in amounts of spaces.
+#. type: Content of: <div><p>
+#| msgid ""
+#| "Please see the <a href=\"/server/standards/README.translations.html"
+#| "\">Translations README</a> for information on coordinating and submitting "
+#| "translations of this article."
+msgid "Please see the <a
href=\"/server/standards/README.translations.html\">Translations README</a> for
information on coordinating and submitting translations of this article."
+msgstr "Zie <a
href=\"/server/standards/README.translations.html\">Translations README</a>
voor nadere informatie over het eventueel vertalen van dit artikel."
+
+# | Copyright © 2004, [-2006-] {+2006, 2010+} Richard M. Stallman
+#. type: Content of: <div><p>
+#| msgid "Copyright © 2004, 2006 Richard M. Stallman"
+msgid "Copyright © 2004, 2006, 2010 Richard M. Stallman"
+msgstr "Copyright © 2004, 2006, 2010 Richard M. Stallman"
+
+#. type: Content of: <div><p>
+msgid "This page is licensed under a <a rel=\"license\"
href=\"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/3.0/us/\";>Creative Commons
Attribution-NoDerivs 3.0 United States License</a>."
+msgstr "Deze pagina valt onder de <a rel=\"license\"
href=\"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/3.0/us/\";>Creative Commons
Attribution-NoDerivs 3.0 United States Licentie</a>."
+
+#. TRANSLATORS: Use space (SPC) as msgstr if you don't want credits.
+#. type: Content of: <div><div>
+msgid "*GNUN-SLOT: TRANSLATOR'S CREDITS*"
+msgstr " "
+
+# type: Content of: <div><p>
+#. timestamp start
+#. type: Content of: <div><p>
+msgid "Updated:"
+msgstr "Bijgewerkt:"
+
- www/philosophy/po not-ipr.nl.po,
Tom Uijldert <=