www-commits
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

www/philosophy microsoft.ca.html po/microsoft.c...


From: GNUN
Subject: www/philosophy microsoft.ca.html po/microsoft.c...
Date: Fri, 07 Sep 2012 08:35:18 +0000

CVSROOT:        /web/www
Module name:    www
Changes by:     GNUN <gnun>     12/09/07 08:35:18

Modified files:
        philosophy     : microsoft.ca.html 
Added files:
        philosophy/po  : microsoft.ca-diff.html 

Log message:
        Automatic update by GNUnited Nations.

CVSWeb URLs:
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/microsoft.ca.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.18&r2=1.19
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/po/microsoft.ca-diff.html?cvsroot=www&rev=1.1

Patches:
Index: microsoft.ca.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/microsoft.ca.html,v
retrieving revision 1.18
retrieving revision 1.19
diff -u -b -r1.18 -r1.19
--- microsoft.ca.html   10 Jun 2012 09:18:43 -0000      1.18
+++ microsoft.ca.html   7 Sep 2012 08:34:39 -0000       1.19
@@ -5,6 +5,13 @@
 <title>És Microsoft el Papu? - GNU Project - Free Software Foundation 
(FSF)</title>
 
 <!--#include virtual="/server/banner.ca.html" -->
+<!--#set var="PO_FILE"
+ value='<a href="http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/po/microsoft.ca.po";>
+ http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/po/microsoft.ca.po</a>' -->
+ <!--#set var="ORIGINAL_FILE" value="/philosophy/microsoft.html" -->
+ <!--#set var="DIFF_FILE" value="/philosophy/po/microsoft.ca-diff.html" -->
+ <!--#set var="OUTDATED_SINCE" value="2012-07-09" -->
+ <!--#include virtual="/server/outdated.ca.html" -->
 <!--#include virtual="/philosophy/po/microsoft.translist" -->
 <h2>És Microsoft el Papu?</h2>
 
@@ -144,7 +151,7 @@
 <!-- timestamp start -->
 Updated:
 
-$Date: 2012/06/10 09:18:43 $
+$Date: 2012/09/07 08:34:39 $
 
 <!-- timestamp end -->
 </p>

Index: po/microsoft.ca-diff.html
===================================================================
RCS file: po/microsoft.ca-diff.html
diff -N po/microsoft.ca-diff.html
--- /dev/null   1 Jan 1970 00:00:00 -0000
+++ po/microsoft.ca-diff.html   7 Sep 2012 08:35:03 -0000       1.1
@@ -0,0 +1,151 @@
+<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Strict//EN"
+    "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-strict.dtd";>
+<!-- Generated by GNUN -->
+<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"; xml:lang="en" lang="en">
+<head>
+<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8" />
+<title>/philosophy/microsoft.html-diff</title>
+<style type="text/css">
+span.removed { background-color: #f22; color: #000; }
+span.inserted { background-color: #2f2; color: #000; }
+</style></head>
+<body><pre>
+&lt;!--#include virtual="/server/header.html" --&gt;
+&lt;title&gt;Is Microsoft the Great Satan? - GNU Project - Free Software 
Foundation (FSF)&lt;/title&gt;
+&lt;!--#include virtual="/server/banner.html" --&gt;
+&lt;!--#include virtual="/philosophy/po/microsoft.translist" --&gt;
+&lt;h2&gt;Is Microsoft the Great Satan?&lt;/h2&gt;
+
+&lt;div class="announcement"&gt;
+&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;This article was given a major rewrite in 2009.
+The &lt;a href="/philosophy/microsoft-old.html"&gt;old version&lt;/a&gt; is 
also
+available.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
+&lt;/div&gt;
+
+&lt;p&gt;Many people think of Microsoft as the monster menace of the
+software industry.  There is even a specific campaign to boycott
+Microsoft.  This feeling has intensified since Microsoft expressed
+active hostility towards free software.&lt;/p&gt;
+
+&lt;p&gt;In the free software movement, our perspective is different.  We
+see that Microsoft is doing something that mistreats software users:
+making software &lt;a 
href="/philosophy/categories.html#ProprietarySoftware"&gt;
+proprietary&lt;/a&gt; and thus denying users their rightful freedom.  But
+Microsoft is not alone in this; many other companies do the same thing
+to the users.  If other companies manage to dominate fewer users than
+Microsoft, that is not for lack of trying.&lt;/p&gt;
+
+&lt;p&gt;This is not meant to excuse Microsoft.  Rather, it is meant as a
+reminder that Microsoft is the natural development of a software
+industry based on &lt;a href="/philosophy/shouldbefree.html"&gt;keeping
+users divided and subjugating them&lt;/a&gt;.  When criticizing Microsoft,
+we should not focus so narrowly on Microsoft that we let other
+proprietary software developers off the hook.&lt;/p&gt;
+
+&lt;p&gt;When we reject Microsoft's proprietary software, that is not a
+boycott.  The word &ldquo;boycott&rdquo; means rejection, as a
+protest, of products that are otherwise acceptable.  Rejecting a
+product because it hurts you is not a boycott, just ordinary
+rationality.  To maintain your freedom, you need to
+reject &lt;em&gt;all&lt;/em&gt; proprietary software, regardless of who 
developed
+it or who distributes it.&lt;/p&gt;
+
+&lt;p&gt;There is no need to reject Microsoft non-software products, or
+services that you can use without proprietary software.  (When you use
+a web service, whether Microsoft's or not, watch out for
+&lt;a href="/philosophy/javascript-trap.html"&gt;non-free JavaScript
+programs&lt;/a&gt; that it may try to slip into your browser.)  When
+Microsoft releases free programs, which it occasionally does, they are
+acceptable in theory; but most of them depend fundamentally on
+Microsoft proprietary software, which we do need to reject, and that
+makes them useless for anyone that chooses to live in freedom.&lt;/p&gt;
+
+&lt;p&gt;In the &ldquo;Halloween documents&rdquo;, leaked in October 1998,
+Microsoft executives stated an intention to use various methods to
+obstruct the development of free software: specifically, designing
+secret protocols and file formats, and patenting algorithms and
+software features.&lt;/p&gt;
+
+&lt;p&gt;These obstructionist policies were not new: Microsoft, and many
+other software companies, had been doing them for years.  Secrecy
+and patents have obstructed us greatly, and they may be more damaging
+in the future.  For the most part, the companies' main motivation in
+doing these things is to attack each other; now, it seems, we are
+specifically targeted.  Microsoft is using its patents directly to
+&lt;a <span 
class="removed"><del><strong>href="http://press.redhat.com/2009/09/09/microsoft-and-patent-trolls/"&gt;</strong></del></span>
 <span 
class="inserted"><ins><em>href="http://www.redhat.com/about/news/archive/2009/9/microsoft-and-patent-trolls"&gt;</em></ins></span>
+attack the free software community&lt;/a&gt;, and our community is fighting
+back.&lt;/p&gt;
+
+&lt;p&gt;But Microsoft's patents are not the only patents that threaten us
+(and software developers and users generally)&mdash;consider the harm
+that the MP3 patent has done.  Thus, defending against specific
+attacks is necessary but not sufficient.  The only full solution is
+to &lt;a href="http://endsoftpatents.org/"&gt;eliminate software
+patents&lt;/a&gt;.
+&lt;/p&gt;
+
+&lt;p&gt;Other Microsoft practices specifically harmful to the adoption of
+free software are the ones designed to build up social inertia that
+obstructs migration to GNU/Linux.  For instance, when Microsoft
+&ldquo;donates&rdquo; copies of Windows to schools, it converts these
+schools into tools for implanting a dependence on Windows.  There are
+indications that Microsoft systematically plans these
+activities &lt;a href="http://boycottnovell.com/wiki/index.php/EDGI"&gt; as
+a campaign against the adoption of GNU/Linux&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
+
+&lt;p&gt;Each Windows &ldquo;upgrade&rdquo; augments Microsoft's power over
+the users; Microsoft plans it that way.  And each one is a step
+forward in malicious features, which
+include &lt;a href="http://DefectiveByDesign.org"&gt;Digital Restrictions
+Management&lt;/a&gt; and back doors.  So the FSF runs campaigns to warn
+users against &ldquo;upgrading&rdquo;
+to &lt;a href="http://BadVista.org/"&gt;Windows Vista&lt;/a&gt;
+and &lt;a href="http://Windows7Sins.org"&gt;Windows 7&lt;/a&gt;.  We aim to 
reduce
+the amount of inertia they will create.&lt;/p&gt;
+
+&lt;p&gt;We don't hate Microsoft, and we don't consider it the Great Satan.
+But we do recognize it as the company that has separated more users
+from their freedom than any other, and a powerful avowed enemy of
+computer users' freedom.  We act accordingly.&lt;/p&gt;
+&lt;/div&gt;
+
+&lt;!--#include virtual="/server/footer.html" --&gt;
+
+&lt;div id="footer"&gt;
+
+&lt;p&gt;Please send FSF &amp; GNU inquiries to
+&lt;a href="mailto:address@hidden"&gt;&lt;address@hidden&gt;&lt;/a&gt;.
+There are also &lt;a href="/contact/"&gt;other ways to contact&lt;/a&gt;
+the FSF.
+&lt;br /&gt;
+Please send broken links and other corrections or suggestions to
+&lt;a href="mailto:address@hidden"&gt;&lt;address@hidden&gt;&lt;/a&gt;.
+&lt;/p&gt;
+
+&lt;p&gt;
+Please see the 
+&lt;a href="/server/standards/README.translations.html"&gt;Translations
+README&lt;/a&gt; for information on coordinating and submitting
+translations of this article.
+&lt;/p&gt;
+
+&lt;p&gt;
+Copyright &copy; 1997, 1998, 1999, 2000, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010 Free
+Software Foundation, Inc.&lt;/p&gt;
+&lt;p&gt;This page is licensed under a &lt;a rel="license"
+href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/3.0/us/"&gt;Creative
+Commons Attribution-NoDerivs 3.0 United States License&lt;/a&gt;.
+&lt;/p&gt;
+
+&lt;p&gt;
+Updated:
+&lt;!-- timestamp start --&gt;
+$Date: 2012/09/07 08:35:03 $
+&lt;!-- timestamp end --&gt;
+&lt;/p&gt;
+&lt;/div&gt;
+
+&lt;/div&gt;
+&lt;/body&gt;
+&lt;/html&gt;
+</pre></body></html>



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]