[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
www/philosophy bsd.html
From: |
Richard M. Stallman |
Subject: |
www/philosophy bsd.html |
Date: |
Thu, 02 Aug 2012 23:43:47 +0000 |
CVSROOT: /web/www
Module name: www
Changes by: Richard M. Stallman <rms> 12/08/02 23:43:47
Modified files:
philosophy : bsd.html
Log message:
Mention that the Apache license is preferred to the X11 license.
Link to /licenses/license-recommendations.html.
CVSWeb URLs:
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/bsd.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.34&r2=1.35
Patches:
Index: bsd.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/bsd.html,v
retrieving revision 1.34
retrieving revision 1.35
diff -u -b -r1.34 -r1.35
--- bsd.html 10 Jun 2012 08:06:06 -0000 1.34
+++ bsd.html 2 Aug 2012 23:43:31 -0000 1.35
@@ -132,10 +132,16 @@
example which has no particular problem. For instance, if you talk
about “X11-style licenses”, you will encourage people to copy
the
license from X11, which avoids the advertising clause for certain,
- rather than take a risk by randomly choosing one of the two BSD
+ rather than take a risk by randomly choosing one of the BSD
licenses.
</p>
<p>
+ Or you could mention the non-copyleft license
+ which <a href="/licenses/license-recommendations.html"> we
+ recommend over the other non-copyleft licenses</a>: the Apache 2.0
+ license, which has a clause to prevent patent treachery.
+</p>
+<p>
When you want to refer specifically to one of the BSD licenses,
please always state which one: the “original BSD license” or
the
“revised BSD license”.
@@ -180,7 +186,7 @@
<p>
Updated:
<!-- timestamp start -->
-$Date: 2012/06/10 08:06:06 $
+$Date: 2012/08/02 23:43:31 $
<!-- timestamp end -->
</p>
</div>
[Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread] |
- www/philosophy bsd.html,
Richard M. Stallman <=