[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
www/philosophy no-ip-ethos.html
From: |
Richard M. Stallman |
Subject: |
www/philosophy no-ip-ethos.html |
Date: |
Sun, 16 Oct 2011 09:41:42 +0000 |
CVSROOT: /webcvs/www
Module name: www
Changes by: Richard M. Stallman <rms> 11/10/16 09:41:42
Modified files:
philosophy : no-ip-ethos.html
Log message:
Minor changes.
CVSWeb URLs:
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/no-ip-ethos.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.17&r2=1.18
Patches:
Index: no-ip-ethos.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /webcvs/www/www/philosophy/no-ip-ethos.html,v
retrieving revision 1.17
retrieving revision 1.18
diff -u -b -r1.17 -r1.18
--- no-ip-ethos.html 16 Oct 2011 09:38:28 -0000 1.17
+++ no-ip-ethos.html 16 Oct 2011 09:41:37 -0000 1.18
@@ -41,8 +41,8 @@
want to do is easier.</p>
<p>Disney wishes to stamp out semi-underground organizations that
- sell exact copies. With free software, regardless of the type of
- license, that kind of copying is legal. What we want to prevent,
+ sell exact copies. With free software, regardless of precisely which
+ free license is used, that kind of copying is legal. What we want to prevent,
when the free software license is the
GNU <a href="/copyleft/gpl.html">GPL</a>, is the release of
proprietary software products based on our code. That kind of abuse
@@ -79,7 +79,7 @@
“intellectual property” and “patents” as if they were
two names for the same thing. Having studied those two laws,
Meeker knows they are vastly different; all they have in common
- is a rough sketch of their form.</p>
+ is an abstract sketch of their form.</p>
<p>Other “intellectual property” laws don't even
share that much with them. The implication that you can treat
@@ -94,7 +94,7 @@
<p>What is really in the U.S. Constitution? It doesn't mention
“intellectual property”, and it says nothing at all
- about most of the laws that term covers. Only two of them —
+ about most of the laws that term is applied to. Only two of them —
copyright law and patent law — are treated there.</p>
<p>What does the Constitution say about them? What is its ethos?
@@ -160,7 +160,7 @@
<p>
Updated:
<!-- timestamp start -->
-$Date: 2011/10/16 09:38:28 $
+$Date: 2011/10/16 09:41:37 $
<!-- timestamp end -->
</p>
</div>