[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
www/philosophy danger-of-software-patents.html ...
From: |
Jeanne Rasata |
Subject: |
www/philosophy danger-of-software-patents.html ... |
Date: |
Tue, 29 Jun 2010 02:21:00 +0000 |
CVSROOT: /web/www
Module name: www
Changes by: Jeanne Rasata <jrasata> 10/06/29 02:21:00
Modified files:
philosophy : danger-of-software-patents.html ebooks.html
freedom-or-copyright.html mcvoy.html
misinterpreting-copyright.html
no-word-attachments.html
push-copyright-aside.html
who-does-that-server-really-serve.html
why-free.html
Log message:
added comma or colon before direct quote, or removed redundant quotes,
or added quotes
CVSWeb URLs:
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/danger-of-software-patents.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.15&r2=1.16
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/ebooks.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.12&r2=1.13
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/freedom-or-copyright.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.40&r2=1.41
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/mcvoy.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.7&r2=1.8
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/misinterpreting-copyright.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.29&r2=1.30
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.61&r2=1.62
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/push-copyright-aside.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.15&r2=1.16
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/who-does-that-server-really-serve.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.17&r2=1.18
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/why-free.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.55&r2=1.56
Patches:
Index: danger-of-software-patents.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/danger-of-software-patents.html,v
retrieving revision 1.15
retrieving revision 1.16
diff -u -b -r1.15 -r1.16
--- danger-of-software-patents.html 28 Jun 2010 11:36:44 -0000 1.15
+++ danger-of-software-patents.html 29 Jun 2010 02:20:16 -0000 1.16
@@ -566,7 +566,7 @@
<p>So if your employer says to you, “We need some patents to
defend ourselves, so help us get patents,” I recommend this
-response.</p>
+response:</p>
<blockquote><p>Boss, I trust you and I'm sure you would only use those
patents to defend the company if it's attacked. But I don't know
@@ -1431,7 +1431,7 @@
<p>Updated:
<!-- timestamp start -->
-$Date: 2010/06/28 11:36:44 $
+$Date: 2010/06/29 02:20:16 $
<!-- timestamp end -->
</p>
Index: ebooks.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/ebooks.html,v
retrieving revision 1.12
retrieving revision 1.13
diff -u -b -r1.12 -r1.13
--- ebooks.html 15 Dec 2009 14:57:50 -0000 1.12
+++ ebooks.html 29 Jun 2010 02:20:28 -0000 1.13
@@ -100,7 +100,7 @@
<p>Eventually, when computer networks provide an easy way to send
someone a small amount of money, the whole rationale for restricting
verbatim copying will go away. If you like a book, and it pops up a
-box saying “Click here to give the author one dollar”,
+box saying, “Click here to give the author one dollar”,
wouldn't you click? Copyright for books and music, as it applies to
distributing verbatim unmodified copies, will be entirely obsolete.
And not a moment too soon!</p>
@@ -136,7 +136,7 @@
<p>
Updated:
<!-- timestamp start -->
-$Date: 2009/12/15 14:57:50 $
+$Date: 2010/06/29 02:20:28 $
<!-- timestamp end -->
</p>
</div>
Index: freedom-or-copyright.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/freedom-or-copyright.html,v
retrieving revision 1.40
retrieving revision 1.41
diff -u -b -r1.40 -r1.41
--- freedom-or-copyright.html 28 Jun 2010 11:12:06 -0000 1.40
+++ freedom-or-copyright.html 29 Jun 2010 02:20:33 -0000 1.41
@@ -148,7 +148,7 @@
When computer networks provide an easy anonymous method for sending
someone a small amount of money, without a credit card, it will be
easy to set up a much better system to support the arts. When you
-view a work, there will be a button you can press saying “Click
+view a work, there will be a button you can press saying, “Click
here to send the artist one dollar”. Wouldn't you press it, at
least once a week?</p>
@@ -219,7 +219,7 @@
<p>
Updated:
<!-- timestamp start -->
-$Date: 2010/06/28 11:12:06 $
+$Date: 2010/06/29 02:20:33 $
<!-- timestamp end -->
</p>
</div>
Index: mcvoy.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/mcvoy.html,v
retrieving revision 1.7
retrieving revision 1.8
diff -u -b -r1.7 -r1.8
--- mcvoy.html 24 Jun 2010 14:19:43 -0000 1.7
+++ mcvoy.html 29 Jun 2010 02:20:38 -0000 1.8
@@ -40,8 +40,8 @@
</p>
<p>
-The free software movement has said “Think of free speech, not
-free beer” for 15 years. McVoy said the opposite; he invited
+The free software movement has said “Think of ‘free speech,’
not
+‘free beer’” for 15 years. McVoy said the opposite; he
invited
developers to focus on the lack of monetary price, instead of on
freedom. A free software activist would dismiss this suggestion, but
those in our community who value technical advantage above freedom and
@@ -155,7 +155,7 @@
<p>
Updated:
<!-- timestamp start -->
-$Date: 2010/06/24 14:19:43 $
+$Date: 2010/06/29 02:20:38 $
<!-- timestamp end -->
</p>
</div>
Index: misinterpreting-copyright.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/misinterpreting-copyright.html,v
retrieving revision 1.29
retrieving revision 1.30
diff -u -b -r1.29 -r1.30
--- misinterpreting-copyright.html 29 Jun 2010 00:26:02 -0000 1.29
+++ misinterpreting-copyright.html 29 Jun 2010 02:20:45 -0000 1.30
@@ -366,7 +366,7 @@
<p>
Libraries were a key source of opposition to this bill, especially to
the aspects that block the forms of copying that are considered
-“fair use.” How did the publishers respond? Former
+fair use. How did the publishers respond? Former
representative Pat Schroeder, now a lobbyist for the Association of
American Publishers, said that the publishers “could not live
with what [the libraries were] asking for.” Since the libraries
@@ -641,7 +641,7 @@
<p>
Updated:
<!-- timestamp start -->
-$Date: 2010/06/29 00:26:02 $
+$Date: 2010/06/29 02:20:45 $
<!-- timestamp end -->
</p>
</div>
Index: no-word-attachments.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html,v
retrieving revision 1.61
retrieving revision 1.62
diff -u -b -r1.61 -r1.62
--- no-word-attachments.html 29 Jun 2010 00:01:53 -0000 1.61
+++ no-word-attachments.html 29 Jun 2010 02:20:49 -0000 1.62
@@ -87,7 +87,7 @@
If we all do this, we will have a much larger effect. People who
disregard one polite request may change their practice when they
receive multiple polite requests from various people. We may be able
-to give “don't send Word format” the status of netiquette,
+to give <em>Don't send Word format!</em> the status of netiquette,
if we start systematically raising the issue with everyone who sends
us Word files.</p>
@@ -294,7 +294,7 @@
<p>
Updated:
<!-- timestamp start -->
-$Date: 2010/06/29 00:01:53 $
+$Date: 2010/06/29 02:20:49 $
<!-- timestamp end -->
</p>
</div>
Index: push-copyright-aside.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/push-copyright-aside.html,v
retrieving revision 1.15
retrieving revision 1.16
diff -u -b -r1.15 -r1.16
--- push-copyright-aside.html 29 Jun 2010 00:21:02 -0000 1.15
+++ push-copyright-aside.html 29 Jun 2010 02:20:50 -0000 1.16
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
<!--#include virtual="/server/header.html" -->
<title>Science must “push copyright aside” - GNU Project - Free
Software Foundation (FSF)</title>
<!--#include virtual="/server/banner.html" -->
-<h2>Science must “push copyright aside”</h2>
+<h2>Science must push copyright aside</h2>
<p>by <strong>Richard M. Stallman</strong></p>
@@ -136,7 +136,7 @@
<p>
Updated:
<!-- timestamp start -->
-$Date: 2010/06/29 00:21:02 $
+$Date: 2010/06/29 02:20:50 $
<!-- timestamp end -->
</p>
</div>
Index: who-does-that-server-really-serve.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/who-does-that-server-really-serve.html,v
retrieving revision 1.17
retrieving revision 1.18
diff -u -b -r1.17 -r1.18
--- who-does-that-server-really-serve.html 28 Jun 2010 12:08:40 -0000
1.17
+++ who-does-that-server-really-serve.html 29 Jun 2010 02:20:50 -0000
1.18
@@ -126,7 +126,7 @@
changing the software. But none of these servers would give you
control over computing you do on it, unless it's <em>your</em> server.
The rest would all be SaaS. SaaS always subjects you to the power of
-the server operator, and the only remedy is, <em>don't use SaaS!</em>
+the server operator, and the only remedy is, <em>Don't use SaaS!</em>
Don't use someone else's server to do your own computing on data
provided by you.</p>
@@ -295,7 +295,7 @@
<p>Updated:
<!-- timestamp start -->
-$Date: 2010/06/28 12:08:40 $
+$Date: 2010/06/29 02:20:50 $
<!-- timestamp end -->
</p>
</div>
Index: why-free.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/why-free.html,v
retrieving revision 1.55
retrieving revision 1.56
diff -u -b -r1.55 -r1.56
--- why-free.html 24 Jun 2010 14:08:16 -0000 1.55
+++ why-free.html 29 Jun 2010 02:20:50 -0000 1.56
@@ -60,7 +60,7 @@
All four practices resemble those used in the former Soviet Union,
where every copying machine had a guard to prevent forbidden copying,
and where individuals had to copy information secretly and pass it
-from hand to hand as “samizdat”. There is of course a
+from hand to hand as samizdat. There is of course a
difference: the motive for information control in the Soviet Union was
political; in the US the motive is profit. But it is the actions that
affect us, not the motive. Any attempt to block the sharing of
@@ -342,7 +342,7 @@
<p>
Updated:
<!-- timestamp start -->
-$Date: 2010/06/24 14:08:16 $
+$Date: 2010/06/29 02:20:50 $
<!-- timestamp end -->
</p>
</div>