[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
www/philosophy can-you-trust.html categories.ht...
From: |
Karl Berry |
Subject: |
www/philosophy can-you-trust.html categories.ht... |
Date: |
Wed, 23 Jun 2010 13:50:43 +0000 |
CVSROOT: /web/www
Module name: www
Changes by: Karl Berry <karl> 10/06/23 13:50:43
Modified files:
philosophy : can-you-trust.html categories.html
java-trap.html
open-source-misses-the-point.html
philosophy.html push-copyright-aside.html
right-to-read.html
software-literary-patents.html
words-to-avoid.html
Log message:
typos found by jeanne
CVSWeb URLs:
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/can-you-trust.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.35&r2=1.36
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/categories.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.61&r2=1.62
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/java-trap.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.35&r2=1.36
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/open-source-misses-the-point.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.37&r2=1.38
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/philosophy.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.320&r2=1.321
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/push-copyright-aside.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.11&r2=1.12
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/right-to-read.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.44&r2=1.45
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/software-literary-patents.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.19&r2=1.20
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.120&r2=1.121
Patches:
Index: can-you-trust.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/can-you-trust.html,v
retrieving revision 1.35
retrieving revision 1.36
diff -u -b -r1.35 -r1.36
--- can-you-trust.html 6 Jan 2010 17:50:53 -0000 1.35
+++ can-you-trust.html 23 Jun 2010 13:50:39 -0000 1.36
@@ -208,7 +208,7 @@
types of secrets Palladium could be used to keep, including
“third party secrets” and “user
secrets”—but it put “user secrets” in
-quotation marks, recognizing that this somewhat of an absurdity in the
+quotation marks, recognizing that this is somewhat of an absurdity in the
context of Palladium.</p>
<p>
The presentation made frequent use of other terms that we frequently
@@ -275,7 +275,7 @@
<p>
Updated:
<!-- timestamp start -->
-$Date: 2010/01/06 17:50:53 $
+$Date: 2010/06/23 13:50:39 $
<!-- timestamp end -->
</p>
</div>
Index: categories.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/categories.html,v
retrieving revision 1.61
retrieving revision 1.62
diff -u -b -r1.61 -r1.62
--- categories.html 4 Apr 2010 23:05:22 -0000 1.61
+++ categories.html 23 Jun 2010 13:50:39 -0000 1.62
@@ -245,7 +245,7 @@
software, we also say that it is a GNU program or a GNU
package. The README or manual of a GNU package should say it
is one; also, the <a href="/directory">Free Software
- Directory</a> indentifies all GNU packages.</p>
+ Directory</a> identifies all GNU packages.</p>
<p>Most GNU software is <a href=
"/copyleft/copyleft.html">copylefted</a> , but not all; however,
@@ -410,7 +410,7 @@
<p>
Updated:
<!-- timestamp start -->
-$Date: 2010/04/04 23:05:22 $
+$Date: 2010/06/23 13:50:39 $
<!-- timestamp end -->
</p>
</div>
Index: java-trap.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/java-trap.html,v
retrieving revision 1.35
retrieving revision 1.36
diff -u -b -r1.35 -r1.36
--- java-trap.html 17 May 2010 20:45:32 -0000 1.35
+++ java-trap.html 23 Jun 2010 13:50:39 -0000 1.36
@@ -134,7 +134,7 @@
than a full implementation of the specification. (See
<a
href="http://jcp.org/aboutJava/communityprocess/JSPA2.pdf">http://jcp.org/aboutJava/communityprocess/JSPA2.pdf</a>
and
<a
href="http://jcp.org/aboutJava/communityprocess/final/jsr129/j2me_pb-1_0-fr-spec-license.html">http://jcp.org/aboutJava/communityprocess/final/jsr129/j2me_pb-1_0-fr-spec-license.html</a>
- for examples).
+ for examples.)
</p>
<p>
@@ -229,7 +229,7 @@
<p>
Updated:
<!-- timestamp start -->
-$Date: 2010/05/17 20:45:32 $
+$Date: 2010/06/23 13:50:39 $
<!-- timestamp end -->
</p>
</div>
Index: open-source-misses-the-point.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/open-source-misses-the-point.html,v
retrieving revision 1.37
retrieving revision 1.38
diff -u -b -r1.37 -r1.38
--- open-source-misses-the-point.html 29 May 2010 23:04:56 -0000 1.37
+++ open-source-misses-the-point.html 23 Jun 2010 13:50:39 -0000 1.38
@@ -28,7 +28,7 @@
system</a>. Most of these users, however, have never heard of the ethical
reasons for which we developed this system and built the free software
community, because nowadays this system and community are more often
-spoken of as “open source,”, attributing them to a different
+spoken of as “open source”, attributing them to a different
philosophy in which these freedoms are hardly mentioned.</p>
<p>The free software movement has campaigned for computer users'
@@ -355,7 +355,7 @@
<p>
Updated:
<!-- timestamp start -->
-$Date: 2010/05/29 23:04:56 $
+$Date: 2010/06/23 13:50:39 $
<!-- timestamp end -->
</p>
</div>
Index: philosophy.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/philosophy.html,v
retrieving revision 1.320
retrieving revision 1.321
diff -u -b -r1.320 -r1.321
--- philosophy.html 28 Apr 2010 14:56:35 -0000 1.320
+++ philosophy.html 23 Jun 2010 13:50:39 -0000 1.321
@@ -16,8 +16,12 @@
<p>Hot off the presses, here are the latest published articles on free
software and the GNU project.</p>
<ul>
- <li> <a
href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/blog/2010/apr/06/digital-economy-bill-richard-stallman">Digital
economy bill: One clown giveth and the other clown taketh away</a></li>
- <li><a href="/philosophy/who-does-that-server-really-serve.html">Who does
that server really serve?</a></li>
+ <li><a
+
href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/blog/2010/apr/06/digital-economy-bill-richard-stallman">Digital
+ economy bill: One clown giveth and the other clown taketh
+ away</a></li>
+ <li><a href="/philosophy/who-does-that-server-really-serve.html">Who
+ Does That Server Really Serve?</a></li>
<li><a href="/philosophy/public-domain-manifesto.html">Why I Will Not Sign
the Public Domain Manifesto</a></li>
<li><a href="/philosophy/selling-exceptions.html">On Selling
@@ -125,7 +129,7 @@
<p>
Updated:
<!-- timestamp start -->
-$Date: 2010/04/28 14:56:35 $
+$Date: 2010/06/23 13:50:39 $
<!-- timestamp end -->
</p>
</div>
Index: push-copyright-aside.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/push-copyright-aside.html,v
retrieving revision 1.11
retrieving revision 1.12
diff -u -b -r1.11 -r1.12
--- push-copyright-aside.html 28 Apr 2010 21:34:38 -0000 1.11
+++ push-copyright-aside.html 23 Jun 2010 13:50:39 -0000 1.12
@@ -14,7 +14,8 @@
Software want to know more about how the principles can be applied to
areas other than software.</em></p>
-<p><em>This article appeared in <em>Nature Webdebates</em> in 2001</em></p>
+<p>(This article appeared in <em>Nature</em> magazine's
+<b>web</b>debates forum in 2001.)</p>
<p>It should be a truism that the scientific literature exists to
disseminate scientific knowledge, and that scientific journals exist
@@ -135,7 +136,7 @@
<p>
Updated:
<!-- timestamp start -->
-$Date: 2010/04/28 21:34:38 $
+$Date: 2010/06/23 13:50:39 $
<!-- timestamp end -->
</p>
</div>
Index: right-to-read.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/right-to-read.html,v
retrieving revision 1.44
retrieving revision 1.45
diff -u -b -r1.44 -r1.45
--- right-to-read.html 17 Apr 2010 16:06:17 -0000 1.44
+++ right-to-read.html 23 Jun 2010 13:50:39 -0000 1.45
@@ -287,7 +287,7 @@
James Boyle, New York Times, 31 March 1996</li>
<li>Public Data or Private Data, Washington Post, 4 Nov 1996. We
- used to have a link to this, but Washinton Post has decided to
+ used to have a link to this, but the Washington Post has decided to
start charging users who wishes to read articles on the web site
and therefore we have decided to remove the link.</li>
@@ -360,7 +360,7 @@
<p>
Updated:
<!-- timestamp start -->
-$Date: 2010/04/17 16:06:17 $
+$Date: 2010/06/23 13:50:39 $
<!-- timestamp end -->
</p>
</div>
Index: software-literary-patents.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/software-literary-patents.html,v
retrieving revision 1.19
retrieving revision 1.20
diff -u -b -r1.19 -r1.20
--- software-literary-patents.html 15 Dec 2009 15:44:40 -0000 1.19
+++ software-literary-patents.html 23 Jun 2010 13:50:39 -0000 1.20
@@ -51,7 +51,7 @@
</p>
<p>
-Consider Victor Hugo's novel, <cite> Les Misérables</cite>. Since he
+Consider Victor Hugo's novel <cite> Les Misérables</cite>. Since he
wrote it, the copyright belonged only to him. He
did not have to fear that some stranger could sue him for copyright
infringement and win. That was impossible, because copyright covers
@@ -256,7 +256,7 @@
<p>
Updated:
<!-- timestamp start -->
-$Date: 2009/12/15 15:44:40 $
+$Date: 2010/06/23 13:50:39 $
<!-- timestamp end -->
</p>
</div>
Index: words-to-avoid.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html,v
retrieving revision 1.120
retrieving revision 1.121
diff -u -b -r1.120 -r1.121
--- words-to-avoid.html 11 Mar 2010 23:59:09 -0000 1.120
+++ words-to-avoid.html 23 Jun 2010 13:50:39 -0000 1.121
@@ -184,7 +184,7 @@
recording, or running a program, does not consume it.</p>
<p>
The terms “producer” and “consumer” come from
-economic theory, and bring with them its narrow prespective and
+economic theory, and bring with them its narrow perspective and
misguided assumptions. They tend to warp your thinking.</p>
<p>
In addition, describing the users of software as “consumers”
@@ -630,7 +630,7 @@
<a href="/philosophy/can-you-trust.html">“Trusted computing”</a> is
the proponents' name for a scheme to redesign computers so that
application developers can trust your computer to obey them instead of
-you. For their point of view, it is “trusted”; from your
+you. From their point of view, it is “trusted”; from your
point of view, it is “treacherous.”
</p>
@@ -690,7 +690,7 @@
<p>
Updated:
<!-- timestamp start -->
-$Date: 2010/03/11 23:59:09 $
+$Date: 2010/06/23 13:50:39 $
<!-- timestamp end -->
</p>
</div>
[Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread] |
- www/philosophy can-you-trust.html categories.ht...,
Karl Berry <=