[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
www doc/doc.ca.html philosophy/free-sw.af.html ...
|
From: |
Yavor Doganov |
|
Subject: |
www doc/doc.ca.html philosophy/free-sw.af.html ... |
|
Date: |
Thu, 29 Apr 2010 08:26:27 +0000 |
CVSROOT: /web/www
Module name: www
Changes by: Yavor Doganov <yavor> 10/04/29 08:26:27
Modified files:
doc : doc.ca.html
philosophy : free-sw.af.html free-sw.ar.html free-sw.bg.html
free-sw.es.html free-sw.fr.html free-sw.sk.html
free-sw.sr.html free-sw.tr.html
pirate-party.fr.html pirate-party.it.html
push-copyright-aside.bg.html
push-copyright-aside.fr.html
push-copyright-aside.tr.html
philosophy/po : dat.fr.po dat.pot freedom-or-copyright.fa.po
freedom-or-copyright.fr.po
freedom-or-copyright.pot
push-copyright-aside.bg.po
push-copyright-aside.fr.po
push-copyright-aside.pot
push-copyright-aside.tr.po
server : body-include-2.el.html
Added files:
philosophy : philosophy.el.html pirate-party.cs.html
Log message:
Automatic update by GNUnited Nations.
CVSWeb URLs:
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/doc/doc.ca.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.10&r2=1.11
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/free-sw.af.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.15&r2=1.16
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/free-sw.ar.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.21&r2=1.22
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/free-sw.bg.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.24&r2=1.25
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/free-sw.es.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.22&r2=1.23
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/free-sw.fr.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.59&r2=1.60
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/free-sw.sk.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.8&r2=1.9
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/free-sw.sr.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.23&r2=1.24
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/free-sw.tr.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.24&r2=1.25
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/pirate-party.fr.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.4&r2=1.5
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/pirate-party.it.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.1&r2=1.2
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/push-copyright-aside.bg.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.5&r2=1.6
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/push-copyright-aside.fr.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.12&r2=1.13
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/push-copyright-aside.tr.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.1&r2=1.2
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/philosophy.el.html?cvsroot=www&rev=1.1
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/pirate-party.cs.html?cvsroot=www&rev=1.1
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/po/dat.fr.po?cvsroot=www&r1=1.8&r2=1.9
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/po/dat.pot?cvsroot=www&r1=1.4&r2=1.5
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/po/freedom-or-copyright.fa.po?cvsroot=www&r1=1.4&r2=1.5
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/po/freedom-or-copyright.fr.po?cvsroot=www&r1=1.5&r2=1.6
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/po/freedom-or-copyright.pot?cvsroot=www&r1=1.4&r2=1.5
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/po/push-copyright-aside.bg.po?cvsroot=www&r1=1.4&r2=1.5
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/po/push-copyright-aside.fr.po?cvsroot=www&r1=1.5&r2=1.6
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/po/push-copyright-aside.pot?cvsroot=www&r1=1.3&r2=1.4
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/po/push-copyright-aside.tr.po?cvsroot=www&r1=1.1&r2=1.2
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/server/body-include-2.el.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.6&r2=1.7
Patches:
Index: doc/doc.ca.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/doc/doc.ca.html,v
retrieving revision 1.10
retrieving revision 1.11
diff -u -b -r1.10 -r1.11
--- doc/doc.ca.html 28 Apr 2010 20:26:16 -0000 1.10
+++ doc/doc.ca.html 29 Apr 2010 08:26:15 -0000 1.11
@@ -110,7 +110,7 @@
<!-- timestamp start -->
Updated:
-$Date: 2010/04/28 20:26:16 $
+$Date: 2010/04/29 08:26:15 $
<!-- timestamp end -->
</p>
Index: philosophy/free-sw.af.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/free-sw.af.html,v
retrieving revision 1.15
retrieving revision 1.16
diff -u -b -r1.15 -r1.16
--- philosophy/free-sw.af.html 29 Jan 2010 09:25:51 -0000 1.15
+++ philosophy/free-sw.af.html 29 Apr 2010 08:26:18 -0000 1.16
@@ -25,9 +25,9 @@
</p>
<p>
-<q>Vrye sagteware</q> gaan oor vryheid en nie prys nie. Daarom die woord
-<q>vry</q> en nie gratis nie. Vrye sagteware kan jou geld kos terwyl
-sommige sagteware wat jy verniet kry nie noodwendig vry is nie.
+“Free software” is a matter of liberty, not price. To
+understand the concept, you should think of “free” as in
+“free speech,” not as in “free beer.”
</p>
<p>
@@ -94,7 +94,8 @@
In order for freedoms 1 and 3 (the freedom to make changes and the freedom
to publish improved versions) to be meaningful, you must have access to the
source code of the program. Therefore, accessibility of source code is a
-necessary condition for free software.
+necessary condition for free software. Obfuscated “source code”
+is not real source code and does not count as source code.
</p>
<p>
@@ -143,13 +144,13 @@
</p>
<p>
-<q>Free software</q> does not mean <q>noncommercial.</q> A free program must
-be available for commercial use, commercial development, and commercial
-distribution. Commercial development of free software is no longer unusual;
-such free commercial software is very important. You may have paid money to
-get copies of free software, or you may have obtained copies at no charge.
-But regardless of how you got your copies, you always have the freedom to
-copy and change the software, even to <a
+“Free software” does not mean “noncommercial.” A
+free program must be available for commercial use, commercial development,
+and commercial distribution. Commercial development of free software is no
+longer unusual; such free commercial software is very important. You may
+have paid money to get copies of free software, or you may have obtained
+copies at no charge. But regardless of how you got your copies, you always
+have the freedom to copy and change the software, even to <a
href="/philosophy/selling.html">sell copies</a>.
</p>
@@ -162,20 +163,20 @@
<p>
However, rules about how to package a modified version are acceptable, if
they don't substantively limit your freedom to release modified versions, or
-your freedom to make and use modified versions privately. Rules that <q>if
-you make your version available in this way, you must make it available in
-that way also</q> can be acceptable too, on the same condition. (Note that
-such a rule still leaves you the choice of whether to publish your version
-at all.) Rules that require release of source code to the users for
-versions that you put into public use are also acceptable. It is also
-acceptable for the license to require that you identify your modifications
-as yours, or that, if you have distributed a modified version and a previous
-developer asks for a copy of it, you must send one.
+your freedom to make and use modified versions privately. Rules that
+“if you make your version available in this way, you must make it
+available in that way also” can be acceptable too, on the same
+condition. (Note that such a rule still leaves you the choice of whether to
+publish your version at all.) Rules that require release of source code to
+the users for versions that you put into public use are also acceptable. It
+is also acceptable for the license to require that you identify your
+modifications as yours, or that, if you have distributed a modified version
+and a previous developer asks for a copy of it, you must send one.
</p>
<p>
-In the GNU project, we use <q><a
-href="/copyleft/copyleft.html">copyleft</a></q> to protect these freedoms
+In the GNU project, we use “<a
+href="/copyleft/copyleft.html">copyleft</a>” to protect these freedoms
legally for everyone. But <a
href="/philosophy/categories.html#Non-CopyleftedFreeSoftware">non-copylefted
free software</a> also exists. We believe there are important reasons why
@@ -185,10 +186,9 @@
</p>
<p>
-Sien <a
-href="http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/categories.html";>Kategorieë</a> van
-Vrye Sagteware vir 'n beskrywing van hoe vrye sagteware, kopielinkse
-sagteware en ander kategorieë sagteware verband hou met mekaar.
+See <a href="/philosophy/categories.html">Categories of Free Software</a>
+for a description of how “free software,” “copylefted
+software” and other categories of software relate to each other.
</p>
<p>
@@ -223,13 +223,13 @@
<p>
When talking about free software, it is best to avoid using terms like
-<q>give away</q> or <q>for free,</q> because those terms imply that the
-issue is about price, not freedom. Some common terms such as <q>piracy</q>
-embody opinions we hope you won't endorse. See <a
+“give away” or “for free,” because those terms imply
+that the issue is about price, not freedom. Some common terms such as
+“piracy” embody opinions we hope you won't endorse. See <a
href="/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html">Confusing Words and Phrases that are
Worth Avoiding</a> for a discussion of these terms. We also have a list of
-proper <a href="/philosophy/fs-translations.html">translations of <q>free
-software</q></a> into various languages.
+proper <a href="/philosophy/fs-translations.html">translations of
+“free software”</a> into various languages.
</p>
<p>
@@ -295,11 +295,13 @@
<h2 id="open-source">Oopbron?</h2>
<p>
-'n Ander groep het begin om die begrip oopbron te gebruik om iets
-soortgelyks (maar nie identies) aan vrye sagteware te beteken. Die begrip
-vrye sagteware word verkies omdat dit vryheid beklemtoon. Die woord <a
-href="http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/open-source-misses-the-point.html";>oop
-verwys nooit na vryheid nie</a>.
+Another group has started using the term “open source” to mean
+something close (but not identical) to “free software.” We
+prefer the term “free software” because, once you have heard
+that it refers to freedom rather than price, it calls to mind freedom. The
+word “open” <a
+href="/philosophy/open-source-misses-the-point.html"> never refers to
+freedom</a>.
</p>
<h2 id="History">History</h2>
@@ -312,6 +314,10 @@
<ul>
<li><a
+href="http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewvc/www/philosophy/free-sw.html?root=www&r1=1.91&r2=1.92";>Version
+1.92</a>: Clarify that obfuscated code does not qualify as source code.</li>
+
+<li><a
href="http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewvc/www/philosophy/free-sw.html?root=www&r1=1.89&r2=1.90";>Version
1.90</a>: Clarify that freedom 3 means the right to distribute copies of
your own modified or improved version, not a right to participate in someone
@@ -442,7 +448,7 @@
<!-- timestamp start -->
Opgedateer:
-$Date: 2010/01/29 09:25:51 $
+$Date: 2010/04/29 08:26:18 $
<!-- timestamp end -->
</p>
Index: philosophy/free-sw.ar.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/free-sw.ar.html,v
retrieving revision 1.21
retrieving revision 1.22
diff -u -b -r1.21 -r1.22
--- philosophy/free-sw.ar.html 29 Jan 2010 09:25:51 -0000 1.21
+++ philosophy/free-sw.ar.html 29 Apr 2010 08:26:18 -0000 1.22
@@ -24,9 +24,9 @@
</p>
<p>
-Ù٠اÙÙغة اÙØ¥ÙجÙÙزÙØ©Ø <q>Free software</q> تد٠عÙÙ
اÙØرÙØ©Ø ÙÙÙس اÙسعر. ÙÙÙÙ
-اÙÙÙرة باÙÙغة اÙØ¥ÙجÙÙزÙØ©Ø Ø§Ø¹ØªØ¨Ø± <q>free</q> ÙÙ
ا
ÙÙ ÙاÙت ÙÙ <q>free
-speech</q> ÙÙÙس <q>free beer</q>.
+“Free software” is a matter of liberty, not price. To
+understand the concept, you should think of “free” as in
+“free speech,” not as in “free beer.”
</p>
<p>
@@ -89,7 +89,8 @@
In order for freedoms 1 and 3 (the freedom to make changes and the freedom
to publish improved versions) to be meaningful, you must have access to the
source code of the program. Therefore, accessibility of source code is a
-necessary condition for free software.
+necessary condition for free software. Obfuscated “source code”
+is not real source code and does not count as source code.
</p>
<p>
@@ -135,13 +136,13 @@
</p>
<p>
-<q>Free software</q> does not mean <q>noncommercial.</q> A free program must
-be available for commercial use, commercial development, and commercial
-distribution. Commercial development of free software is no longer unusual;
-such free commercial software is very important. You may have paid money to
-get copies of free software, or you may have obtained copies at no charge.
-But regardless of how you got your copies, you always have the freedom to
-copy and change the software, even to <a
+“Free software” does not mean “noncommercial.” A
+free program must be available for commercial use, commercial development,
+and commercial distribution. Commercial development of free software is no
+longer unusual; such free commercial software is very important. You may
+have paid money to get copies of free software, or you may have obtained
+copies at no charge. But regardless of how you got your copies, you always
+have the freedom to copy and change the software, even to <a
href="/philosophy/selling.html">sell copies</a>.
</p>
@@ -153,20 +154,20 @@
<p>
However, rules about how to package a modified version are acceptable, if
they don't substantively limit your freedom to release modified versions, or
-your freedom to make and use modified versions privately. Rules that <q>if
-you make your version available in this way, you must make it available in
-that way also</q> can be acceptable too, on the same condition. (Note that
-such a rule still leaves you the choice of whether to publish your version
-at all.) Rules that require release of source code to the users for
-versions that you put into public use are also acceptable. It is also
-acceptable for the license to require that you identify your modifications
-as yours, or that, if you have distributed a modified version and a previous
-developer asks for a copy of it, you must send one.
+your freedom to make and use modified versions privately. Rules that
+“if you make your version available in this way, you must make it
+available in that way also” can be acceptable too, on the same
+condition. (Note that such a rule still leaves you the choice of whether to
+publish your version at all.) Rules that require release of source code to
+the users for versions that you put into public use are also acceptable. It
+is also acceptable for the license to require that you identify your
+modifications as yours, or that, if you have distributed a modified version
+and a previous developer asks for a copy of it, you must send one.
</p>
<p>
-In the GNU project, we use <q><a
-href="/copyleft/copyleft.html">copyleft</a></q> to protect these freedoms
+In the GNU project, we use “<a
+href="/copyleft/copyleft.html">copyleft</a>” to protect these freedoms
legally for everyone. But <a
href="/philosophy/categories.html#Non-CopyleftedFreeSoftware">non-copylefted
free software</a> also exists. We believe there are important reasons why
@@ -176,9 +177,9 @@
</p>
<p>
-راجع <a href="/philosophy/categories.ar.html">تصاÙÙ٠اÙبرÙ
جÙات اÙØرة</a>
-ÙØ´Ø±Ø ÙÙÙÙØ© ارتباط <q>اÙبرÙ
جÙات اÙØرةØ</q>
Ù<q>اÙبرÙ
جÙات Ù
ترÙÙØ© اÙØÙÙÙ</q>
-ÙغÙرÙا Ù
٠تصاÙÙ٠اÙبرÙ
جÙات ببعضÙا.
+See <a href="/philosophy/categories.html">Categories of Free Software</a>
+for a description of how “free software,” “copylefted
+software” and other categories of software relate to each other.
</p>
<p>
@@ -210,13 +211,13 @@
<p>
When talking about free software, it is best to avoid using terms like
-<q>give away</q> or <q>for free,</q> because those terms imply that the
-issue is about price, not freedom. Some common terms such as <q>piracy</q>
-embody opinions we hope you won't endorse. See <a
+“give away” or “for free,” because those terms imply
+that the issue is about price, not freedom. Some common terms such as
+“piracy” embody opinions we hope you won't endorse. See <a
href="/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html">Confusing Words and Phrases that are
Worth Avoiding</a> for a discussion of these terms. We also have a list of
-proper <a href="/philosophy/fs-translations.html">translations of <q>free
-software</q></a> into various languages.
+proper <a href="/philosophy/fs-translations.html">translations of
+“free software”</a> into various languages.
</p>
<p>
@@ -273,11 +274,13 @@
<h2 id="open-source">اÙÙ
صدر اÙÙ
ÙتÙØØ</h2>
<p>
-بدأت Ù
جÙ
Ùعة أخر٠Ù٠استخداÙ
اÙÙ
صطÙØ <q>open
source</q> ÙÙصد Ø´ÙØ¡ شبÙÙ (ÙغÙر
-Ù
طابÙ) <q>ÙÙبرÙ
جÙات اÙØرة</q> ÙØÙ ÙÙض٠Ù
صطÙØ
<q>اÙبرÙ
جÙات اÙØرة</q> ÙØ£ÙÙ
-ÙÙÙد٠بÙ
جرد سÙ
اع٠إÙ٠اÙتÙÙÙر باÙØرÙØ©. ÙÙÙ
Ø© <q>Ù
ÙتÙØ</q> <a
-href="/philosophy/open-source-misses-the-point.html"> Ùا تشÙر
إطÙاÙا Ø¥ÙÙ
-اÙØرÙØ©</a>.
+Another group has started using the term “open source” to mean
+something close (but not identical) to “free software.” We
+prefer the term “free software” because, once you have heard
+that it refers to freedom rather than price, it calls to mind freedom. The
+word “open” <a
+href="/philosophy/open-source-misses-the-point.html"> never refers to
+freedom</a>.
</p>
<h2 id="History">اÙتارÙØ®</h2>
@@ -289,6 +292,10 @@
<ul>
<li><a
+href="http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewvc/www/philosophy/free-sw.html?root=www&r1=1.91&r2=1.92";>Version
+1.92</a>: Clarify that obfuscated code does not qualify as source code.</li>
+
+<li><a
href="http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewvc/www/philosophy/free-sw.html?root=www&r1=1.89&r2=1.90";>Version
1.90</a>: Clarify that freedom 3 means the right to distribute copies of
your own modified or improved version, not a right to participate in someone
@@ -411,7 +418,7 @@
<!-- timestamp start -->
ØÙدÙثت:
-$Date: 2010/01/29 09:25:51 $
+$Date: 2010/04/29 08:26:18 $
<!-- timestamp end -->
</p>
Index: philosophy/free-sw.bg.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/free-sw.bg.html,v
retrieving revision 1.24
retrieving revision 1.25
diff -u -b -r1.24 -r1.25
--- philosophy/free-sw.bg.html 29 Jan 2010 09:25:52 -0000 1.24
+++ philosophy/free-sw.bg.html 29 Apr 2010 08:26:18 -0000 1.25
@@ -28,9 +28,9 @@
</p>
<p>
-âСвободниÑÑ ÑоÑÑÑеÑâ е изÑаз на
ÑвободаÑа, а не на ÑенаÑа. Ðа да ÑазбеÑеÑе
-конÑепÑиÑÑа, миÑлеÑе Ñи за âÑвобода на
ÑловоÑоâ, а не âбезплаÑен
-обÑдâ<sup><a href="#TransNote1">1</a></sup>.
+“Free software” is a matter of liberty, not price. To
+understand the concept, you should think of “free” as in
+“free speech,” not as in “free beer.”
</p>
<p>
@@ -97,7 +97,8 @@
In order for freedoms 1 and 3 (the freedom to make changes and the freedom
to publish improved versions) to be meaningful, you must have access to the
source code of the program. Therefore, accessibility of source code is a
-necessary condition for free software.
+necessary condition for free software. Obfuscated “source code”
+is not real source code and does not count as source code.
</p>
<p>
@@ -146,13 +147,13 @@
</p>
<p>
-<q>Free software</q> does not mean <q>noncommercial.</q> A free program must
-be available for commercial use, commercial development, and commercial
-distribution. Commercial development of free software is no longer unusual;
-such free commercial software is very important. You may have paid money to
-get copies of free software, or you may have obtained copies at no charge.
-But regardless of how you got your copies, you always have the freedom to
-copy and change the software, even to <a
+“Free software” does not mean “noncommercial.” A
+free program must be available for commercial use, commercial development,
+and commercial distribution. Commercial development of free software is no
+longer unusual; such free commercial software is very important. You may
+have paid money to get copies of free software, or you may have obtained
+copies at no charge. But regardless of how you got your copies, you always
+have the freedom to copy and change the software, even to <a
href="/philosophy/selling.html">sell copies</a>.
</p>
@@ -165,20 +166,20 @@
<p>
However, rules about how to package a modified version are acceptable, if
they don't substantively limit your freedom to release modified versions, or
-your freedom to make and use modified versions privately. Rules that <q>if
-you make your version available in this way, you must make it available in
-that way also</q> can be acceptable too, on the same condition. (Note that
-such a rule still leaves you the choice of whether to publish your version
-at all.) Rules that require release of source code to the users for
-versions that you put into public use are also acceptable. It is also
-acceptable for the license to require that you identify your modifications
-as yours, or that, if you have distributed a modified version and a previous
-developer asks for a copy of it, you must send one.
+your freedom to make and use modified versions privately. Rules that
+“if you make your version available in this way, you must make it
+available in that way also” can be acceptable too, on the same
+condition. (Note that such a rule still leaves you the choice of whether to
+publish your version at all.) Rules that require release of source code to
+the users for versions that you put into public use are also acceptable. It
+is also acceptable for the license to require that you identify your
+modifications as yours, or that, if you have distributed a modified version
+and a previous developer asks for a copy of it, you must send one.
</p>
<p>
-In the GNU project, we use <q><a
-href="/copyleft/copyleft.html">copyleft</a></q> to protect these freedoms
+In the GNU project, we use “<a
+href="/copyleft/copyleft.html">copyleft</a>” to protect these freedoms
legally for everyone. But <a
href="/philosophy/categories.html#Non-CopyleftedFreeSoftware">non-copylefted
free software</a> also exists. We believe there are important reasons why
@@ -188,9 +189,9 @@
</p>
<p>
-ÐÑегледайÑе ÑÑаÑиÑÑа â<a
href="/philosophy/categories.html">Ðидове Ñвободен
-ÑоÑÑÑеÑ</a>â за опиÑаниеÑо как каÑегоÑииÑе
âÑвободен ÑоÑÑÑеÑâ, âÑоÑÑÑÐµÑ ÑÑÑ
-заÑиÑа copyleftâ и дÑÑгиÑе видове Ñе
ÑÑоÑнаÑÑÑ ÐµÐ´Ð¸Ð½ Ñ Ð´ÑÑг.
+See <a href="/philosophy/categories.html">Categories of Free Software</a>
+for a description of how “free software,” “copylefted
+software” and other categories of software relate to each other.
</p>
<p>
@@ -225,13 +226,13 @@
<p>
When talking about free software, it is best to avoid using terms like
-<q>give away</q> or <q>for free,</q> because those terms imply that the
-issue is about price, not freedom. Some common terms such as <q>piracy</q>
-embody opinions we hope you won't endorse. See <a
+“give away” or “for free,” because those terms imply
+that the issue is about price, not freedom. Some common terms such as
+“piracy” embody opinions we hope you won't endorse. See <a
href="/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html">Confusing Words and Phrases that are
Worth Avoiding</a> for a discussion of these terms. We also have a list of
-proper <a href="/philosophy/fs-translations.html">translations of <q>free
-software</q></a> into various languages.
+proper <a href="/philosophy/fs-translations.html">translations of
+“free software”</a> into various languages.
</p>
<p>
@@ -296,12 +297,13 @@
<h2 id="open-source">ÐÑвоÑен код?</h2>
<p>
-Ðдна дÑÑга гÑÑпа запоÑна да използва
ÑеÑмина âоÑвоÑен кодâ, за да обознаÑи
-неÑо близко (но не иденÑиÑно) ÑÑÑ
âÑÐ²Ð¾Ð±Ð¾Ð´Ð½Ð¸Ñ ÑоÑÑÑеÑâ. Ðие пÑедпоÑиÑаме
-понÑÑиеÑо âÑвободен ÑоÑÑÑеÑâ, заÑоÑо
веднÑж каÑо ÑÑеÑе, Ñе Ñе оÑнаÑÑ Ð·Ð°
-ÑвободаÑа, а не за ÑенаÑа, Ñо извиква в
ÑÑзнаниеÑо â âÑвободаâ. ÐÑмаÑа
-âоÑвоÑенâ <a
href="/philosophy/open-source-misses-the-point.bg.html">пÑоÑÑо
-не пÑави Ñова</a>.
+Another group has started using the term “open source” to mean
+something close (but not identical) to “free software.” We
+prefer the term “free software” because, once you have heard
+that it refers to freedom rather than price, it calls to mind freedom. The
+word “open” <a
+href="/philosophy/open-source-misses-the-point.html"> never refers to
+freedom</a>.
</p>
<h2 id="History">History</h2>
@@ -314,6 +316,10 @@
<ul>
<li><a
+href="http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewvc/www/philosophy/free-sw.html?root=www&r1=1.91&r2=1.92";>Version
+1.92</a>: Clarify that obfuscated code does not qualify as source code.</li>
+
+<li><a
href="http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewvc/www/philosophy/free-sw.html?root=www&r1=1.89&r2=1.90";>Version
1.90</a>: Clarify that freedom 3 means the right to distribute copies of
your own modified or improved version, not a right to participate in someone
@@ -466,7 +472,7 @@
<!-- timestamp start -->
ÐоÑледно обновÑване:
-$Date: 2010/01/29 09:25:52 $
+$Date: 2010/04/29 08:26:18 $
<!-- timestamp end -->
</p>
Index: philosophy/free-sw.es.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/free-sw.es.html,v
retrieving revision 1.22
retrieving revision 1.23
diff -u -b -r1.22 -r1.23
--- philosophy/free-sw.es.html 1 Jan 2010 21:25:48 -0000 1.22
+++ philosophy/free-sw.es.html 29 Apr 2010 08:26:19 -0000 1.23
@@ -26,9 +26,9 @@
</p>
<p>
-El <q>software libre</q> es una cuestión de libertad, no de precio. Para
-entender el concepto, deberÃa pensar en <q>libre</q> como en <q>libre
-expresión</q>, no como en <q>barra libre</q>.
+“Free software” is a matter of liberty, not price. To
+understand the concept, you should think of “free” as in
+“free speech,” not as in “free beer.”
</p>
<p>
@@ -95,10 +95,11 @@
</p>
<p>
-Para que la 1ª y 3ª libertad, para realizar cambios y publicar versiones
-mejoradas, tengan sentido; debe tener acceso al código fuente del
-programa. Por consiguiente, el acceso al código fuente es una condición
-necesaria para el software libre.
+In order for freedoms 1 and 3 (the freedom to make changes and the freedom
+to publish improved versions) to be meaningful, you must have access to the
+source code of the program. Therefore, accessibility of source code is a
+necessary condition for free software. Obfuscated “source code”
+is not real source code and does not count as source code.
</p>
<p>
@@ -148,14 +149,14 @@
</p>
<p>
-<q>Software libre</q> no significa <q>que no sea comercial</q>. Un programa
-libre debe estar disponible para el uso comercial, la programación comercial
-y la distribución comercial. La programación comercial de software libre ya
-no es inusual; tal software libre comercial es muy importante. Puede haber
-pagado dinero para obtener copias de software libre, o puede haber obtenido
-copias sin costo. Pero sin tener en cuenta cómo obtuvo sus copias, siempre
-tiene la libertad de copiar y modificar el software, incluso de <a
-href="/philosophy/selling.es.html">vender copias</a>.
+“Free software” does not mean “noncommercial.” A
+free program must be available for commercial use, commercial development,
+and commercial distribution. Commercial development of free software is no
+longer unusual; such free commercial software is very important. You may
+have paid money to get copies of free software, or you may have obtained
+copies at no charge. But regardless of how you got your copies, you always
+have the freedom to copy and change the software, even to <a
+href="/philosophy/selling.html">sell copies</a>.
</p>
<p>
@@ -165,36 +166,34 @@
</p>
<p>
-Sin embargo, las reglas sobre cómo empaquetar una versión modificada son
-aceptables si no limitan sustancialmente su libertad de publicar versiones
-modificadas, o su libertad de hacer y usar versiones modificadas en
-privado. Las reglas estilo <q>si usted hace disponible su versión de tal
-modo, debe hacerla disponible en tal otro modo</q> pueden ser aceptables
-también, bajo la misma condición. (Note que dicha regla todavÃa le deja la
-elección sobre si publicar su versión.). Las reglas que requieran la
-publicación del código fuente a los usuarios para versiones que haya puesto
-en uso público también son aceptables. También es aceptable para la licencia
-requerir que, si distribuyó una versión modificada y un programador anterior
-le pide una copia, le deba enviar una, o que identifique como propias sus
-modificaciones.
+However, rules about how to package a modified version are acceptable, if
+they don't substantively limit your freedom to release modified versions, or
+your freedom to make and use modified versions privately. Rules that
+“if you make your version available in this way, you must make it
+available in that way also” can be acceptable too, on the same
+condition. (Note that such a rule still leaves you the choice of whether to
+publish your version at all.) Rules that require release of source code to
+the users for versions that you put into public use are also acceptable. It
+is also acceptable for the license to require that you identify your
+modifications as yours, or that, if you have distributed a modified version
+and a previous developer asks for a copy of it, you must send one.
</p>
<p>
-En el proyecto GNU, usamos <q><a
-href="/copyleft/copyleft.es.html">copyleft</a></q> para proteger legalmente
-estas libertades para todos. Pero también existe <a
-href="/philosophy/categories.es.html#Non-CopyleftedFreeSoftware">software
-libre sin copyleft</a>. Creemos que existen razones importantes por las que
-<a href="/philosophy/pragmatic.es.html">es mejor usar copyleft</a>, pero si
-su programa es software libre sin copyleft, sigue siendo ético de todos
-modos.
+In the GNU project, we use “<a
+href="/copyleft/copyleft.html">copyleft</a>” to protect these freedoms
+legally for everyone. But <a
+href="/philosophy/categories.html#Non-CopyleftedFreeSoftware">non-copylefted
+free software</a> also exists. We believe there are important reasons why
+<a href="/philosophy/pragmatic.html">it is better to use copyleft</a>, but
+if your program is non-copylefted free software, it is still basically
+ethical.
</p>
<p>
-Vea las <a href="/philosophy/categories.es.html">categorÃas del software
-libre</a> para una descripción de cómo <q>software libre</q>, <q>software
-con copyleft</q> y otras categorÃas de software se relacionan unas con
-otras.
+See <a href="/philosophy/categories.html">Categories of Free Software</a>
+for a description of how “free software,” “copylefted
+software” and other categories of software relate to each other.
</p>
<p>
@@ -232,14 +231,14 @@
</p>
<p>
-Cuando se habla de software libre, es mejor evitar usar términos como
-<q>regalar</q> o <q>gratuito</q>, porque dichos términos implican que el
-asunto pasa por el precio, no la libertad. Algunos términos comunes como
-<q>piraterÃa</q> implican opiniones con las que esperamos no concuerde. Vea
-<a href="/philosophy/words-to-avoid.es.html">palabras y frases confusas que
-vale la pena evitar</a> para el debate sobre esos términos. También tenemos
-una lista de <a href="/philosophy/fs-translations.es.html">traducciones de
-«software libre»</a> a varios idiomas.
+When talking about free software, it is best to avoid using terms like
+“give away” or “for free,” because those terms imply
+that the issue is about price, not freedom. Some common terms such as
+“piracy” embody opinions we hope you won't endorse. See <a
+href="/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html">Confusing Words and Phrases that are
+Worth Avoiding</a> for a discussion of these terms. We also have a list of
+proper <a href="/philosophy/fs-translations.html">translations of
+“free software”</a> into various languages.
</p>
<p>
@@ -306,13 +305,13 @@
<h2 id="open-source">¿Código abierto?</h2>
<p>
-Otro grupo ha comenzado a usar el término <q>código abierto</q> (del inglés
-<q>open source</q>) que significa algo parecido (pero no idéntico) a
-<q>software libre</q>. Preferimos el término <q>software libre</q> porque,
-una vez que ha escuchado que se refiere a la libertad en lugar del precio,
-le hace pensar en la libertad. La palabra <q>abierto</q> <a
-href="/philosophy/open-source-misses-the-point.es.html">nunca se refiere a
-la libertad</a>.
+Another group has started using the term “open source” to mean
+something close (but not identical) to “free software.” We
+prefer the term “free software” because, once you have heard
+that it refers to freedom rather than price, it calls to mind freedom. The
+word “open” <a
+href="/philosophy/open-source-misses-the-point.html"> never refers to
+freedom</a>.
</p>
<h2 id="History">Historial</h2>
@@ -326,6 +325,10 @@
<ul>
<li><a
+href="http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewvc/www/philosophy/free-sw.html?root=www&r1=1.91&r2=1.92";>Version
+1.92</a>: Clarify that obfuscated code does not qualify as source code.</li>
+
+<li><a
href="http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewvc/www/philosophy/free-sw.html?root=www&r1=1.89&r2=1.90";>Version
1.90</a>: aclarar que la 3ª libertad significa el derecho a distribuir
copias de sus propias versiones modificadas o mejoradas. No el derecho de
@@ -462,7 +465,7 @@
<!-- timestamp start -->
Ãltima actualización:
-$Date: 2010/01/01 21:25:48 $
+$Date: 2010/04/29 08:26:19 $
<!-- timestamp end -->
</p>
Index: philosophy/free-sw.fr.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/free-sw.fr.html,v
retrieving revision 1.59
retrieving revision 1.60
diff -u -b -r1.59 -r1.60
--- philosophy/free-sw.fr.html 14 Feb 2010 21:25:40 -0000 1.59
+++ philosophy/free-sw.fr.html 29 Apr 2010 08:26:19 -0000 1.60
@@ -24,11 +24,9 @@
</p>
<p>
-L'expression « Logiciel libre » fait
-référence à la liberté et non pas au prix. Pour
-comprendre le concept, vous devez penser à la
-« liberté d'expression », pas à
-« l'entrée libre ».
+“Free software” is a matter of liberty, not price. To
+understand the concept, you should think of “free” as in
+“free speech,” not as in “free beer.”
</p>
<p>
@@ -99,7 +97,8 @@
In order for freedoms 1 and 3 (the freedom to make changes and the freedom
to publish improved versions) to be meaningful, you must have access to the
source code of the program. Therefore, accessibility of source code is a
-necessary condition for free software.
+necessary condition for free software. Obfuscated “source code”
+is not real source code and does not count as source code.
</p>
<p>
@@ -153,13 +152,13 @@
</p>
<p>
-<q>Free software</q> does not mean <q>noncommercial.</q> A free program must
-be available for commercial use, commercial development, and commercial
-distribution. Commercial development of free software is no longer unusual;
-such free commercial software is very important. You may have paid money to
-get copies of free software, or you may have obtained copies at no charge.
-But regardless of how you got your copies, you always have the freedom to
-copy and change the software, even to <a
+“Free software” does not mean “noncommercial.” A
+free program must be available for commercial use, commercial development,
+and commercial distribution. Commercial development of free software is no
+longer unusual; such free commercial software is very important. You may
+have paid money to get copies of free software, or you may have obtained
+copies at no charge. But regardless of how you got your copies, you always
+have the freedom to copy and change the software, even to <a
href="/philosophy/selling.html">sell copies</a>.
</p>
@@ -172,33 +171,32 @@
<p>
However, rules about how to package a modified version are acceptable, if
they don't substantively limit your freedom to release modified versions, or
-your freedom to make and use modified versions privately. Rules that <q>if
-you make your version available in this way, you must make it available in
-that way also</q> can be acceptable too, on the same condition. (Note that
-such a rule still leaves you the choice of whether to publish your version
-at all.) Rules that require release of source code to the users for
-versions that you put into public use are also acceptable. It is also
-acceptable for the license to require that you identify your modifications
-as yours, or that, if you have distributed a modified version and a previous
-developer asks for a copy of it, you must send one.
+your freedom to make and use modified versions privately. Rules that
+“if you make your version available in this way, you must make it
+available in that way also” can be acceptable too, on the same
+condition. (Note that such a rule still leaves you the choice of whether to
+publish your version at all.) Rules that require release of source code to
+the users for versions that you put into public use are also acceptable. It
+is also acceptable for the license to require that you identify your
+modifications as yours, or that, if you have distributed a modified version
+and a previous developer asks for a copy of it, you must send one.
</p>
<p>
-Dans le projet GNU, nous utilisons le « <a
-href="/copyleft/copyleft.fr.html">copyleft</a> » pour
-protéger ces libertés. Mais des <a
-href="/philosophy/categories.fr.html#Non-CopyleftedFreeSoftware">logiciels
-libres non-copyleftés</a> existent aussi. Nous croyons qu'il y a de
-bonnes raisons qui font <a href="/philosophy/pragmatic.fr.html">qu'il est
-mieux d'utiliser le copyleft</a>, mais si votre programme est libre
-non-copylefté, il est quand même basiquement éthique.
+In the GNU project, we use “<a
+href="/copyleft/copyleft.html">copyleft</a>” to protect these freedoms
+legally for everyone. But <a
+href="/philosophy/categories.html#Non-CopyleftedFreeSoftware">non-copylefted
+free software</a> also exists. We believe there are important reasons why
+<a href="/philosophy/pragmatic.html">it is better to use copyleft</a>, but
+if your program is non-copylefted free software, it is still basically
+ethical.
</p>
<p>
-Lisez <a href="/philosophy/categories.fr.html">Les catégories de
-Logiciel Libre</a>, où sont décrites les relations entre
-« logiciel libre », « logiciel
-copylefté » et les autres catégories de logiciel.
+See <a href="/philosophy/categories.html">Categories of Free Software</a>
+for a description of how “free software,” “copylefted
+software” and other categories of software relate to each other.
</p>
<p>
@@ -233,13 +231,13 @@
<p>
When talking about free software, it is best to avoid using terms like
-<q>give away</q> or <q>for free,</q> because those terms imply that the
-issue is about price, not freedom. Some common terms such as <q>piracy</q>
-embody opinions we hope you won't endorse. See <a
+“give away” or “for free,” because those terms imply
+that the issue is about price, not freedom. Some common terms such as
+“piracy” embody opinions we hope you won't endorse. See <a
href="/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html">Confusing Words and Phrases that are
Worth Avoiding</a> for a discussion of these terms. We also have a list of
-proper <a href="/philosophy/fs-translations.html">translations of <q>free
-software</q></a> into various languages.
+proper <a href="/philosophy/fs-translations.html">translations of
+“free software”</a> into various languages.
</p>
<p>
@@ -310,16 +308,13 @@
<h2 id="open-source">Open Source ?</h2>
<p>
-Un autre groupe a commencé à utiliser le terme
-« open source » pour exprimer quelque chose de proche
-(mais pas d'identique) au « logiciel libre ». Nous
-préférons le terme « logiciel libre »
-parce que, une fois que vous avez entendu que ce terme réfère
-à la liberté plutôt qu'au prix, il appelle à
-prêter attention à la liberté. Le mot
-« open » <a
-href="/philosophy/open-source-misses-the-point.fr.html">ne rend pas compte
-de cela</a>.
+Another group has started using the term “open source” to mean
+something close (but not identical) to “free software.” We
+prefer the term “free software” because, once you have heard
+that it refers to freedom rather than price, it calls to mind freedom. The
+word “open” <a
+href="/philosophy/open-source-misses-the-point.html"> never refers to
+freedom</a>.
</p>
<h2 id="History">Histoire</h2>
@@ -332,6 +327,10 @@
<ul>
<li><a
+href="http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewvc/www/philosophy/free-sw.html?root=www&r1=1.91&r2=1.92";>Version
+1.92</a>: Clarify that obfuscated code does not qualify as source code.</li>
+
+<li><a
href="http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewvc/www/philosophy/free-sw.html?root=www&r1=1.89&r2=1.90";>Version
1.90</a>: Clarify that freedom 3 means the right to distribute copies of
your own modified or improved version, not a right to participate in someone
@@ -471,7 +470,7 @@
<!-- timestamp start -->
Dernière mise à jour :
-$Date: 2010/02/14 21:25:40 $
+$Date: 2010/04/29 08:26:19 $
<!-- timestamp end -->
</p>
Index: philosophy/free-sw.sk.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/free-sw.sk.html,v
retrieving revision 1.8
retrieving revision 1.9
diff -u -b -r1.8 -r1.9
--- philosophy/free-sw.sk.html 29 Jan 2010 09:25:52 -0000 1.8
+++ philosophy/free-sw.sk.html 29 Apr 2010 08:26:19 -0000 1.9
@@ -26,10 +26,9 @@
</p>
<p>
-Slobodný softvér sa týka slobody, nie ceny softvéru<sup><a
-href="#TransNote1">1</a></sup>. Slovo <q>free</q> v originálnom názve
-<q>Free software</q> je preto potrebné chápať v zmysle <q>free speech</q>
-(sloboda prejavu) a nie ako <q>free beer</q> (pivo zadarmo).
+“Free software” is a matter of liberty, not price. To
+understand the concept, you should think of “free” as in
+“free speech,” not as in “free beer.”
</p>
<p>
@@ -96,7 +95,8 @@
In order for freedoms 1 and 3 (the freedom to make changes and the freedom
to publish improved versions) to be meaningful, you must have access to the
source code of the program. Therefore, accessibility of source code is a
-necessary condition for free software.
+necessary condition for free software. Obfuscated “source code”
+is not real source code and does not count as source code.
</p>
<p>
@@ -145,13 +145,13 @@
</p>
<p>
-<q>Free software</q> does not mean <q>noncommercial.</q> A free program must
-be available for commercial use, commercial development, and commercial
-distribution. Commercial development of free software is no longer unusual;
-such free commercial software is very important. You may have paid money to
-get copies of free software, or you may have obtained copies at no charge.
-But regardless of how you got your copies, you always have the freedom to
-copy and change the software, even to <a
+“Free software” does not mean “noncommercial.” A
+free program must be available for commercial use, commercial development,
+and commercial distribution. Commercial development of free software is no
+longer unusual; such free commercial software is very important. You may
+have paid money to get copies of free software, or you may have obtained
+copies at no charge. But regardless of how you got your copies, you always
+have the freedom to copy and change the software, even to <a
href="/philosophy/selling.html">sell copies</a>.
</p>
@@ -164,20 +164,20 @@
<p>
However, rules about how to package a modified version are acceptable, if
they don't substantively limit your freedom to release modified versions, or
-your freedom to make and use modified versions privately. Rules that <q>if
-you make your version available in this way, you must make it available in
-that way also</q> can be acceptable too, on the same condition. (Note that
-such a rule still leaves you the choice of whether to publish your version
-at all.) Rules that require release of source code to the users for
-versions that you put into public use are also acceptable. It is also
-acceptable for the license to require that you identify your modifications
-as yours, or that, if you have distributed a modified version and a previous
-developer asks for a copy of it, you must send one.
+your freedom to make and use modified versions privately. Rules that
+“if you make your version available in this way, you must make it
+available in that way also” can be acceptable too, on the same
+condition. (Note that such a rule still leaves you the choice of whether to
+publish your version at all.) Rules that require release of source code to
+the users for versions that you put into public use are also acceptable. It
+is also acceptable for the license to require that you identify your
+modifications as yours, or that, if you have distributed a modified version
+and a previous developer asks for a copy of it, you must send one.
</p>
<p>
-In the GNU project, we use <q><a
-href="/copyleft/copyleft.html">copyleft</a></q> to protect these freedoms
+In the GNU project, we use “<a
+href="/copyleft/copyleft.html">copyleft</a>” to protect these freedoms
legally for everyone. But <a
href="/philosophy/categories.html#Non-CopyleftedFreeSoftware">non-copylefted
free software</a> also exists. We believe there are important reasons why
@@ -187,9 +187,9 @@
</p>
<p>
-Pozrite sa na <a href="/philosophy/categories.html">kategórie slobodného
-softvéru</a>, ak chcete mať prehľad o tom, ako <q>slobodný softvér,</q>
-<q>copyleftovaný softvér</q> a iné druhy softvéru navzájom súvisia.
+See <a href="/philosophy/categories.html">Categories of Free Software</a>
+for a description of how “free software,” “copylefted
+software” and other categories of software relate to each other.
</p>
<p>
@@ -223,13 +223,13 @@
<p>
When talking about free software, it is best to avoid using terms like
-<q>give away</q> or <q>for free,</q> because those terms imply that the
-issue is about price, not freedom. Some common terms such as <q>piracy</q>
-embody opinions we hope you won't endorse. See <a
+“give away” or “for free,” because those terms imply
+that the issue is about price, not freedom. Some common terms such as
+“piracy” embody opinions we hope you won't endorse. See <a
href="/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html">Confusing Words and Phrases that are
Worth Avoiding</a> for a discussion of these terms. We also have a list of
-proper <a href="/philosophy/fs-translations.html">translations of <q>free
-software</q></a> into various languages.
+proper <a href="/philosophy/fs-translations.html">translations of
+“free software”</a> into various languages.
</p>
<p>
@@ -295,12 +295,13 @@
<h2 id="open-source">Open Source?</h2>
<p>
-Iná skupina ľudà zaÄala použÃvaÅ¥ pojem <q>open souce</q> (otvorený
zdroj),
-ktorým oznaÄuje nieÄo blÃzke (ale nie totožné) <q>slobodnému
softvéru.</q>
-My uprednostÅujeme názov <q>slobodný softvér</q>, pretože ten okamžite
-vyvoláva myšlienku slobody. Pojem <q>otvorený</q> <a
-href="/philosophy/open-source-misses-the-point.html">nijako nepoukazuje na
-slobodu</a>.
+Another group has started using the term “open source” to mean
+something close (but not identical) to “free software.” We
+prefer the term “free software” because, once you have heard
+that it refers to freedom rather than price, it calls to mind freedom. The
+word “open” <a
+href="/philosophy/open-source-misses-the-point.html"> never refers to
+freedom</a>.
</p>
<h2 id="History">História</h2>
@@ -312,6 +313,10 @@
<ul>
<li><a
+href="http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewvc/www/philosophy/free-sw.html?root=www&r1=1.91&r2=1.92";>Version
+1.92</a>: Clarify that obfuscated code does not qualify as source code.</li>
+
+<li><a
href="http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewvc/www/philosophy/free-sw.html?root=www&r1=1.89&r2=1.90";>Version
1.90</a>: Clarify that freedom 3 means the right to distribute copies of
your own modified or improved version, not a right to participate in someone
@@ -449,7 +454,7 @@
<!-- timestamp start -->
Aktualizované:
-$Date: 2010/01/29 09:25:52 $
+$Date: 2010/04/29 08:26:19 $
<!-- timestamp end -->
</p>
Index: philosophy/free-sw.sr.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/free-sw.sr.html,v
retrieving revision 1.23
retrieving revision 1.24
diff -u -b -r1.23 -r1.24
--- philosophy/free-sw.sr.html 29 Jan 2010 09:25:52 -0000 1.23
+++ philosophy/free-sw.sr.html 29 Apr 2010 08:26:19 -0000 1.24
@@ -26,12 +26,9 @@
</p>
<p>
-âСлободни ÑоÑÑвеÑâ (енгл. <em>free software</em>) Ñе
ÑÑÐ²Ð°Ñ Ñлободе, а не
-Ñене. Ðа биÑÑе боÑе ÑазÑмели на ÑÑа миÑлимо
(Ñ ÐµÐ½Ð³Ð»ÐµÑком Ñе пÑидев
-<em>free</em> двоÑмиÑлен â може да ознаÑава
âÑлободноâ, али и âбеÑплаÑноâ,
-пÑим. пÑев.), ÑÑебало би да на ÑеÑ
âÑлободноâ гледаÑе као Ñ ÑинÑагми
-âÑлободни говоÑâ (енгл. <em>free speech</em>), а не
као Ñ ÑинÑагми
-âбеÑплаÑно пивоâ (енгл. <em>free beer</em>).
+“Free software” is a matter of liberty, not price. To
+understand the concept, you should think of “free” as in
+“free speech,” not as in “free beer.”
</p>
<p>
@@ -96,7 +93,8 @@
In order for freedoms 1 and 3 (the freedom to make changes and the freedom
to publish improved versions) to be meaningful, you must have access to the
source code of the program. Therefore, accessibility of source code is a
-necessary condition for free software.
+necessary condition for free software. Obfuscated “source code”
+is not real source code and does not count as source code.
</p>
<p>
@@ -145,13 +143,13 @@
</p>
<p>
-<q>Free software</q> does not mean <q>noncommercial.</q> A free program must
-be available for commercial use, commercial development, and commercial
-distribution. Commercial development of free software is no longer unusual;
-such free commercial software is very important. You may have paid money to
-get copies of free software, or you may have obtained copies at no charge.
-But regardless of how you got your copies, you always have the freedom to
-copy and change the software, even to <a
+“Free software” does not mean “noncommercial.” A
+free program must be available for commercial use, commercial development,
+and commercial distribution. Commercial development of free software is no
+longer unusual; such free commercial software is very important. You may
+have paid money to get copies of free software, or you may have obtained
+copies at no charge. But regardless of how you got your copies, you always
+have the freedom to copy and change the software, even to <a
href="/philosophy/selling.html">sell copies</a>.
</p>
@@ -164,20 +162,20 @@
<p>
However, rules about how to package a modified version are acceptable, if
they don't substantively limit your freedom to release modified versions, or
-your freedom to make and use modified versions privately. Rules that <q>if
-you make your version available in this way, you must make it available in
-that way also</q> can be acceptable too, on the same condition. (Note that
-such a rule still leaves you the choice of whether to publish your version
-at all.) Rules that require release of source code to the users for
-versions that you put into public use are also acceptable. It is also
-acceptable for the license to require that you identify your modifications
-as yours, or that, if you have distributed a modified version and a previous
-developer asks for a copy of it, you must send one.
+your freedom to make and use modified versions privately. Rules that
+“if you make your version available in this way, you must make it
+available in that way also” can be acceptable too, on the same
+condition. (Note that such a rule still leaves you the choice of whether to
+publish your version at all.) Rules that require release of source code to
+the users for versions that you put into public use are also acceptable. It
+is also acceptable for the license to require that you identify your
+modifications as yours, or that, if you have distributed a modified version
+and a previous developer asks for a copy of it, you must send one.
</p>
<p>
-In the GNU project, we use <q><a
-href="/copyleft/copyleft.html">copyleft</a></q> to protect these freedoms
+In the GNU project, we use “<a
+href="/copyleft/copyleft.html">copyleft</a>” to protect these freedoms
legally for everyone. But <a
href="/philosophy/categories.html#Non-CopyleftedFreeSoftware">non-copylefted
free software</a> also exists. We believe there are important reasons why
@@ -187,9 +185,9 @@
</p>
<p>
-ÐогледаÑÑе <a href="/philosophy/categories.sr.html">ÐÑÑÑе
Ñлободног
-ÑоÑÑвеÑа</a> за Ð¾Ð¿Ð¸Ñ Ð¾Ð´Ð½Ð¾Ñа измеÑÑ
âÑлободног ÑоÑÑвеÑаâ, âкопилеÑоÑваног
-ÑоÑÑвеÑаâ и дÑÑгиÑ
каÑегоÑиÑа ÑоÑÑвеÑа.
+See <a href="/philosophy/categories.html">Categories of Free Software</a>
+for a description of how “free software,” “copylefted
+software” and other categories of software relate to each other.
</p>
<p>
@@ -224,13 +222,13 @@
<p>
When talking about free software, it is best to avoid using terms like
-<q>give away</q> or <q>for free,</q> because those terms imply that the
-issue is about price, not freedom. Some common terms such as <q>piracy</q>
-embody opinions we hope you won't endorse. See <a
+“give away” or “for free,” because those terms imply
+that the issue is about price, not freedom. Some common terms such as
+“piracy” embody opinions we hope you won't endorse. See <a
href="/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html">Confusing Words and Phrases that are
Worth Avoiding</a> for a discussion of these terms. We also have a list of
-proper <a href="/philosophy/fs-translations.html">translations of <q>free
-software</q></a> into various languages.
+proper <a href="/philosophy/fs-translations.html">translations of
+“free software”</a> into various languages.
</p>
<p>
@@ -294,12 +292,13 @@
<h2 id="open-source">ÐÑвоÑени извоÑни код?</h2>
<p>
-Ðедна дÑÑга гÑÑпа Ñе поÑела да ÑпоÑÑебÑава
изÑаз âоÑвоÑени извоÑни кодâ да
-ознаÑи неÑÑо блиÑко (али не и иÑÑовеÑно)
âÑлободном ÑоÑÑвеÑÑâ. Ðи Ñе
-одлÑÑÑÑемо за изÑаз âÑлободни ÑоÑÑвеÑâ,
ÑÐµÑ ÐºÐ°Ð´Ð° Ñедном ÑазнаÑе да Ñе он
-одноÑи на ÑлободÑ, а не на ÑенÑ, Ñвек ÑеÑе
Ñе ÑеÑиÑи Ñлободе. Ð ÐµÑ âоÑвоÑеноâ
-<a href="/philosophy/open-source-misses-the-point.html">Ñе никад не
одноÑи
-на ÑлободÑ</a>.
+Another group has started using the term “open source” to mean
+something close (but not identical) to “free software.” We
+prefer the term “free software” because, once you have heard
+that it refers to freedom rather than price, it calls to mind freedom. The
+word “open” <a
+href="/philosophy/open-source-misses-the-point.html"> never refers to
+freedom</a>.
</p>
<h2 id="History">History</h2>
@@ -312,6 +311,10 @@
<ul>
<li><a
+href="http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewvc/www/philosophy/free-sw.html?root=www&r1=1.91&r2=1.92";>Version
+1.92</a>: Clarify that obfuscated code does not qualify as source code.</li>
+
+<li><a
href="http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewvc/www/philosophy/free-sw.html?root=www&r1=1.89&r2=1.90";>Version
1.90</a>: Clarify that freedom 3 means the right to distribute copies of
your own modified or improved version, not a right to participate in someone
@@ -454,7 +457,7 @@
<!-- timestamp start -->
ÐжÑÑиÑано:
-$Date: 2010/01/29 09:25:52 $
+$Date: 2010/04/29 08:26:19 $
<!-- timestamp end -->
</p>
Index: philosophy/free-sw.tr.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/free-sw.tr.html,v
retrieving revision 1.24
retrieving revision 1.25
diff -u -b -r1.24 -r1.25
--- philosophy/free-sw.tr.html 29 Jan 2010 09:25:52 -0000 1.24
+++ philosophy/free-sw.tr.html 29 Apr 2010 08:26:19 -0000 1.25
@@ -25,8 +25,9 @@
</p>
<p>
-<q>Ãzgür yazılım</q> bir özgürlük meselesidir, fiyat deÄil<sup><a
-id="RefTransNote1" href="#TransNote1">1</a></sup>.
+“Free software” is a matter of liberty, not price. To
+understand the concept, you should think of “free” as in
+“free speech,” not as in “free beer.”
</p>
<p>
@@ -92,7 +93,8 @@
In order for freedoms 1 and 3 (the freedom to make changes and the freedom
to publish improved versions) to be meaningful, you must have access to the
source code of the program. Therefore, accessibility of source code is a
-necessary condition for free software.
+necessary condition for free software. Obfuscated “source code”
+is not real source code and does not count as source code.
</p>
<p>
@@ -139,13 +141,13 @@
</p>
<p>
-<q>Free software</q> does not mean <q>noncommercial.</q> A free program must
-be available for commercial use, commercial development, and commercial
-distribution. Commercial development of free software is no longer unusual;
-such free commercial software is very important. You may have paid money to
-get copies of free software, or you may have obtained copies at no charge.
-But regardless of how you got your copies, you always have the freedom to
-copy and change the software, even to <a
+“Free software” does not mean “noncommercial.” A
+free program must be available for commercial use, commercial development,
+and commercial distribution. Commercial development of free software is no
+longer unusual; such free commercial software is very important. You may
+have paid money to get copies of free software, or you may have obtained
+copies at no charge. But regardless of how you got your copies, you always
+have the freedom to copy and change the software, even to <a
href="/philosophy/selling.html">sell copies</a>.
</p>
@@ -159,20 +161,20 @@
<p>
However, rules about how to package a modified version are acceptable, if
they don't substantively limit your freedom to release modified versions, or
-your freedom to make and use modified versions privately. Rules that <q>if
-you make your version available in this way, you must make it available in
-that way also</q> can be acceptable too, on the same condition. (Note that
-such a rule still leaves you the choice of whether to publish your version
-at all.) Rules that require release of source code to the users for
-versions that you put into public use are also acceptable. It is also
-acceptable for the license to require that you identify your modifications
-as yours, or that, if you have distributed a modified version and a previous
-developer asks for a copy of it, you must send one.
+your freedom to make and use modified versions privately. Rules that
+“if you make your version available in this way, you must make it
+available in that way also” can be acceptable too, on the same
+condition. (Note that such a rule still leaves you the choice of whether to
+publish your version at all.) Rules that require release of source code to
+the users for versions that you put into public use are also acceptable. It
+is also acceptable for the license to require that you identify your
+modifications as yours, or that, if you have distributed a modified version
+and a previous developer asks for a copy of it, you must send one.
</p>
<p>
-In the GNU project, we use <q><a
-href="/copyleft/copyleft.html">copyleft</a></q> to protect these freedoms
+In the GNU project, we use “<a
+href="/copyleft/copyleft.html">copyleft</a>” to protect these freedoms
legally for everyone. But <a
href="/philosophy/categories.html#Non-CopyleftedFreeSoftware">non-copylefted
free software</a> also exists. We believe there are important reasons why
@@ -182,10 +184,9 @@
</p>
<p>
-<q>özgür yazılım</q>, <q>copyleft yazılım</q> ile diÄer yazılım
kategorileri
-ve bunların birbirleriyle iliÅkilerini görmek için <a
-href="/philosophy/categories.html">Ãzgür Yazılım Kategorileri</a>
sayfasına
-bakın.
+See <a href="/philosophy/categories.html">Categories of Free Software</a>
+for a description of how “free software,” “copylefted
+software” and other categories of software relate to each other.
</p>
<p>
@@ -220,13 +221,13 @@
<p>
When talking about free software, it is best to avoid using terms like
-<q>give away</q> or <q>for free,</q> because those terms imply that the
-issue is about price, not freedom. Some common terms such as <q>piracy</q>
-embody opinions we hope you won't endorse. See <a
+“give away” or “for free,” because those terms imply
+that the issue is about price, not freedom. Some common terms such as
+“piracy” embody opinions we hope you won't endorse. See <a
href="/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html">Confusing Words and Phrases that are
Worth Avoiding</a> for a discussion of these terms. We also have a list of
-proper <a href="/philosophy/fs-translations.html">translations of <q>free
-software</q></a> into various languages.
+proper <a href="/philosophy/fs-translations.html">translations of
+“free software”</a> into various languages.
</p>
<p>
@@ -290,12 +291,13 @@
<h2 id="open-source">Açık Kaynak?</h2>
<p>
-DiÄer bir grup, <q>özgür yazılım</q> kavramına benzer (ancak aynısı
deÄil)
-<q>açık kaynak</q> diye bir terim kullanmaya baÅladı. Biz, <q>özgür
-yazılım</q> terimini tercih ediyoruz, çünkü bu terimin ücret yerine
-özgürlüÄü simgelediÄini bir kere duyduÄunuzda, bu terim artık size
düÅünce
-özgürlüÄünü çaÄrıÅtırır. Ancak <q>açık</q> kelimesi, asla
özgürlüÄe iÅaret
-etmez.
+Another group has started using the term “open source” to mean
+something close (but not identical) to “free software.” We
+prefer the term “free software” because, once you have heard
+that it refers to freedom rather than price, it calls to mind freedom. The
+word “open” <a
+href="/philosophy/open-source-misses-the-point.html"> never refers to
+freedom</a>.
</p>
<h2 id="History">Tarih</h2>
@@ -308,6 +310,10 @@
<ul>
<li><a
+href="http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewvc/www/philosophy/free-sw.html?root=www&r1=1.91&r2=1.92";>Version
+1.92</a>: Clarify that obfuscated code does not qualify as source code.</li>
+
+<li><a
href="http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewvc/www/philosophy/free-sw.html?root=www&r1=1.89&r2=1.90";>Version
1.90</a>: Clarify that freedom 3 means the right to distribute copies of
your own modified or improved version, not a right to participate in someone
@@ -496,7 +502,7 @@
<!-- timestamp start -->
Son Güncelleme:
-$Date: 2010/01/29 09:25:52 $
+$Date: 2010/04/29 08:26:19 $
<!-- timestamp end -->
</p>
Index: philosophy/pirate-party.fr.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/pirate-party.fr.html,v
retrieving revision 1.4
retrieving revision 1.5
diff -u -b -r1.4 -r1.5
--- philosophy/pirate-party.fr.html 1 Oct 2009 20:25:54 -0000 1.4
+++ philosophy/pirate-party.fr.html 29 Apr 2010 08:26:19 -0000 1.5
@@ -166,7 +166,7 @@
<!-- timestamp start -->
Dernière mise à jour :
-$Date: 2009/10/01 20:25:54 $
+$Date: 2010/04/29 08:26:19 $
<!-- timestamp end -->
</p>
@@ -175,21 +175,23 @@
<div id="translations">
<h4>Traductions de cette page</h4>
-<!-- Please keep this list alphabetical by language code. -->
-<!-- Comment what the language is for each type, i.e. de is German. -->
-<!-- Write the language name in its own language (Deutsch) in the text. -->
-<!-- If you add a new language here, please -->
-<!-- advise address@hidden and add it to -->
-<!-- - /home/www/html/server/standards/README.translations.html -->
-<!-- - one of the lists under the section "Translations Underway" -->
-<!-- - if there is a translation team, you also have to add an alias -->
-<!-- to mail.gnu.org:/com/mailer/aliases -->
-<!-- Please also check you have the language code right; see: -->
-<!-- http://www.loc.gov/standards/iso639-2/php/code_list.php -->
-<!-- If the 2-letter ISO 639-1 code is not available, -->
-<!-- use the 3-letter ISO 639-2. -->
-<!-- Please use W3C normative character entities. -->
+<!-- Please keep this list alphabetical by language code.
+ Comment what the language is for each type, i.e. de is German.
+ Write the language name in its own language (Deutsch) in the text.
+ If you add a new language here, please
+ advise address@hidden and add it to
+ - /home/www/html/server/standards/README.translations.html
+ - one of the lists under the section "Translations Underway"
+ - if there is a translation team, you also have to add an alias
+ to mail.gnu.org:/com/mailer/aliases
+ Please also check you have the language code right; see:
+ http://www.loc.gov/standards/iso639-2/php/code_list.php
+ If the 2-letter ISO 639-1 code is not available,
+ use the 3-letter ISO 639-2.
+ Please use W3C normative character entities. -->
<ul class="translations-list">
+<!-- Czech -->
+<li><a href="/philosophy/pirate-party.cs.html">Česky</a> [cs]</li>
<!-- English -->
<li><a href="/philosophy/pirate-party.html">English</a> [en]</li>
<!-- French -->
Index: philosophy/pirate-party.it.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/pirate-party.it.html,v
retrieving revision 1.1
retrieving revision 1.2
diff -u -b -r1.1 -r1.2
--- philosophy/pirate-party.it.html 1 Oct 2009 20:25:55 -0000 1.1
+++ philosophy/pirate-party.it.html 29 Apr 2010 08:26:19 -0000 1.2
@@ -157,7 +157,7 @@
<!-- timestamp start -->
Ultimo aggiornamento:
-$Date: 2009/10/01 20:25:55 $
+$Date: 2010/04/29 08:26:19 $
<!-- timestamp end -->
</p>
@@ -166,21 +166,23 @@
<div id="translations">
<h4>Traduzioni di questa pagina</h4>
-<!-- Please keep this list alphabetical by language code. -->
-<!-- Comment what the language is for each type, i.e. de is German. -->
-<!-- Write the language name in its own language (Deutsch) in the text. -->
-<!-- If you add a new language here, please -->
-<!-- advise address@hidden and add it to -->
-<!-- - /home/www/html/server/standards/README.translations.html -->
-<!-- - one of the lists under the section "Translations Underway" -->
-<!-- - if there is a translation team, you also have to add an alias -->
-<!-- to mail.gnu.org:/com/mailer/aliases -->
-<!-- Please also check you have the language code right; see: -->
-<!-- http://www.loc.gov/standards/iso639-2/php/code_list.php -->
-<!-- If the 2-letter ISO 639-1 code is not available, -->
-<!-- use the 3-letter ISO 639-2. -->
-<!-- Please use W3C normative character entities. -->
+<!-- Please keep this list alphabetical by language code.
+ Comment what the language is for each type, i.e. de is German.
+ Write the language name in its own language (Deutsch) in the text.
+ If you add a new language here, please
+ advise address@hidden and add it to
+ - /home/www/html/server/standards/README.translations.html
+ - one of the lists under the section "Translations Underway"
+ - if there is a translation team, you also have to add an alias
+ to mail.gnu.org:/com/mailer/aliases
+ Please also check you have the language code right; see:
+ http://www.loc.gov/standards/iso639-2/php/code_list.php
+ If the 2-letter ISO 639-1 code is not available,
+ use the 3-letter ISO 639-2.
+ Please use W3C normative character entities. -->
<ul class="translations-list">
+<!-- Czech -->
+<li><a href="/philosophy/pirate-party.cs.html">Česky</a> [cs]</li>
<!-- English -->
<li><a href="/philosophy/pirate-party.html">English</a> [en]</li>
<!-- French -->
Index: philosophy/push-copyright-aside.bg.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/push-copyright-aside.bg.html,v
retrieving revision 1.5
retrieving revision 1.6
diff -u -b -r1.5 -r1.6
--- philosophy/push-copyright-aside.bg.html 12 Jan 2010 21:26:00 -0000
1.5
+++ philosophy/push-copyright-aside.bg.html 29 Apr 2010 08:26:19 -0000
1.6
@@ -10,6 +10,14 @@
<p>Ð¾Ñ <strong>РиÑаÑд Ð. СÑолман</strong></p>
+<p><em>Many points that lead to a conclusion that software freedom must be
+universal often apply to other forms of expressive works, albeit in
+different ways. This essay concerns the application of principles related to
+software freedom to the area of literature. Generally, such issues are
+orthogonal to software freedom, but we include essays like this here since
+many people interested in Free Software want to know more about how the
+principles can be applied to areas other than software.</em></p>
+
<p><em>Тази ÑÑаÑÐ¸Ñ Ñе поÑви в <em>âÐейÑÑÑ
ÑебдибейÑÑâ</em> пÑез 2001 г.</em></p>
<p>ÐавÑÑно вÑеки знае, Ñе наÑÑнаÑа
лиÑеÑаÑÑÑа ÑÑÑеÑÑвÑва, за да
ÑазпÑоÑÑÑанÑва
@@ -145,7 +153,7 @@
<!-- timestamp start -->
ÐоÑледно обновÑване:
-$Date: 2010/01/12 21:26:00 $
+$Date: 2010/04/29 08:26:19 $
<!-- timestamp end -->
</p>
Index: philosophy/push-copyright-aside.fr.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/push-copyright-aside.fr.html,v
retrieving revision 1.12
retrieving revision 1.13
diff -u -b -r1.12 -r1.13
--- philosophy/push-copyright-aside.fr.html 12 Jan 2010 21:26:00 -0000
1.12
+++ philosophy/push-copyright-aside.fr.html 29 Apr 2010 08:26:19 -0000
1.13
@@ -12,6 +12,14 @@
<p>par <strong>Richard M. Stallman</strong></p>
+<p><em>Many points that lead to a conclusion that software freedom must be
+universal often apply to other forms of expressive works, albeit in
+different ways. This essay concerns the application of principles related to
+software freedom to the area of literature. Generally, such issues are
+orthogonal to software freedom, but we include essays like this here since
+many people interested in Free Software want to know more about how the
+principles can be applied to areas other than software.</em></p>
+
<p><em>Cet article est paru dans <em>Nature Webdebates</em> en 2001</em></p>
<p>Il devrait être évident pour tout un chacun que la
@@ -160,7 +168,7 @@
<!-- timestamp start -->
Dernière mise à jour :
-$Date: 2010/01/12 21:26:00 $
+$Date: 2010/04/29 08:26:19 $
<!-- timestamp end -->
</p>
Index: philosophy/push-copyright-aside.tr.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/push-copyright-aside.tr.html,v
retrieving revision 1.1
retrieving revision 1.2
diff -u -b -r1.1 -r1.2
--- philosophy/push-copyright-aside.tr.html 12 Jan 2010 21:26:00 -0000
1.1
+++ philosophy/push-copyright-aside.tr.html 29 Apr 2010 08:26:19 -0000
1.2
@@ -10,6 +10,14 @@
<p>Yazan: <strong>Richard M. Stallman</strong></p>
+<p><em>Many points that lead to a conclusion that software freedom must be
+universal often apply to other forms of expressive works, albeit in
+different ways. This essay concerns the application of principles related to
+software freedom to the area of literature. Generally, such issues are
+orthogonal to software freedom, but we include essays like this here since
+many people interested in Free Software want to know more about how the
+principles can be applied to areas other than software.</em></p>
+
<p><em>Bu yazı 2001'de <em>Nature Webdebates</em>'de
yayınlanmıÅtır</em></p>
<p>Bilimsel literatürün bilimsel bilgiyi yaymak ve bilimsel dergilerin bu
@@ -175,7 +183,7 @@
<!-- timestamp start -->
Son Güncelleme:
-$Date: 2010/01/12 21:26:00 $
+$Date: 2010/04/29 08:26:19 $
<!-- timestamp end -->
</p>
Index: philosophy/po/dat.fr.po
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/po/dat.fr.po,v
retrieving revision 1.8
retrieving revision 1.9
diff -u -b -r1.8 -r1.9
--- philosophy/po/dat.fr.po 21 Apr 2010 20:25:50 -0000 1.8
+++ philosophy/po/dat.fr.po 29 Apr 2010 08:26:21 -0000 1.9
@@ -7,7 +7,7 @@
msgid ""
msgstr ""
"Project-Id-Version: dat.html\n"
-"POT-Creation-Date: 2010-04-21 16:25-0300\n"
+"POT-Creation-Date: 2010-04-29 04:26-0300\n"
"PO-Revision-Date: 2009-11-29 16:06+0100\n"
"Last-Translator: Cédric Corazza <cedric.corazza AT wanadoo.fr>\n"
"Language-Team: French <address@hidden>\n"
@@ -33,6 +33,17 @@
"a>"
# type: Content of: <p>
+msgid ""
+"<em>Many points that lead to a conclusion that software freedom must be "
+"universal often apply to other forms of expressive works, albeit in "
+"different ways. This essay concerns the application of principles related to "
+"software freedom to the area of music. Generally, such issues are "
+"orthogonal to software freedom, but we include essays like this here since "
+"many people interested in Free Software want to know more about how the "
+"principles can be applied to areas other than software.</em>"
+msgstr ""
+
+# type: Content of: <p>
#, fuzzy
#| msgid ""
#| "<em> [This article was published in Wired magazine in 1992; the text has "
Index: philosophy/po/dat.pot
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/po/dat.pot,v
retrieving revision 1.4
retrieving revision 1.5
diff -u -b -r1.4 -r1.5
--- philosophy/po/dat.pot 21 Apr 2010 20:25:50 -0000 1.4
+++ philosophy/po/dat.pot 29 Apr 2010 08:26:21 -0000 1.5
@@ -7,7 +7,7 @@
msgid ""
msgstr ""
"Project-Id-Version: PACKAGE VERSION\n"
-"POT-Creation-Date: 2010-04-21 16:25-0300\n"
+"POT-Creation-Date: 2010-04-29 04:26-0300\n"
"PO-Revision-Date: YEAR-MO-DA HO:MI+ZONE\n"
"Last-Translator: FULL NAME <address@hidden>\n"
"Language-Team: LANGUAGE <address@hidden>\n"
@@ -31,6 +31,17 @@
# type: Content of: <p>
msgid ""
+"<em>Many points that lead to a conclusion that software freedom must be "
+"universal often apply to other forms of expressive works, albeit in "
+"different ways. This essay concerns the application of principles related to "
+"software freedom to the area of music. Generally, such issues are "
+"orthogonal to software freedom, but we include essays like this here since "
+"many people interested in Free Software want to know more about how the "
+"principles can be applied to areas other than software.</em>"
+msgstr ""
+
+# type: Content of: <p>
+msgid ""
"<em>[This article was published in Wired magazine in 1992; the text has not "
"been changed, but notes in square brackets have been added (with these notes "
"emphasized for those browsers that will display emphasized text).]</em>"
Index: philosophy/po/freedom-or-copyright.fa.po
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/po/freedom-or-copyright.fa.po,v
retrieving revision 1.4
retrieving revision 1.5
diff -u -b -r1.4 -r1.5
--- philosophy/po/freedom-or-copyright.fa.po 23 Mar 2010 20:25:53 -0000
1.4
+++ philosophy/po/freedom-or-copyright.fa.po 29 Apr 2010 08:26:21 -0000
1.5
@@ -6,7 +6,7 @@
msgid ""
msgstr ""
"Project-Id-Version: freedom-or-copyright.html\n"
-"POT-Creation-Date: 2010-03-23 16:25-0300\n"
+"POT-Creation-Date: 2010-04-29 04:26-0300\n"
"PO-Revision-Date: 2009-04-18 00:05+0330\n"
"Last-Translator: Abbas Esmaeeli Some'eh <address@hidden>\n"
"Language-Team: Persian <address@hidden>\n"
@@ -27,6 +27,17 @@
msgstr "ÙÙشتÙÙ <strong>رÛÚارد استاÙÙ
Ù</strong>"
# type: Content of: <p>
+msgid ""
+"<em>Many points that lead to a conclusion that software freedom must be "
+"universal often apply to other forms of expressive works, albeit in "
+"different ways. This essay concerns the application of principles related to "
+"software freedom to the area of literature. Generally, such issues are "
+"orthogonal to software freedom, but we include essays like this here since "
+"many people interested in Free Software want to know more about how the "
+"principles can be applied to areas other than software.</em>"
+msgstr ""
+
+# type: Content of: <p>
#, fuzzy
#| msgid ""
#| "Copyright was established in the age of the printing press as an "
Index: philosophy/po/freedom-or-copyright.fr.po
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/po/freedom-or-copyright.fr.po,v
retrieving revision 1.5
retrieving revision 1.6
diff -u -b -r1.5 -r1.6
--- philosophy/po/freedom-or-copyright.fr.po 23 Mar 2010 20:25:53 -0000
1.5
+++ philosophy/po/freedom-or-copyright.fr.po 29 Apr 2010 08:26:21 -0000
1.6
@@ -7,7 +7,7 @@
msgid ""
msgstr ""
"Project-Id-Version: freedom-or-copyright.html\n"
-"POT-Creation-Date: 2010-03-23 16:25-0300\n"
+"POT-Creation-Date: 2010-04-29 04:26-0300\n"
"PO-Revision-Date: 2009-01-06 13:54+0100\n"
"Last-Translator: Cédric Corazza <cedric.corazza AT wanadoo.fr>\n"
"Language-Team: French <address@hidden>\n"
@@ -30,6 +30,17 @@
msgstr "par <strong>Richard M. Stallman</strong>"
# type: Content of: <p>
+msgid ""
+"<em>Many points that lead to a conclusion that software freedom must be "
+"universal often apply to other forms of expressive works, albeit in "
+"different ways. This essay concerns the application of principles related to "
+"software freedom to the area of literature. Generally, such issues are "
+"orthogonal to software freedom, but we include essays like this here since "
+"many people interested in Free Software want to know more about how the "
+"principles can be applied to areas other than software.</em>"
+msgstr ""
+
+# type: Content of: <p>
#, fuzzy
#| msgid ""
#| "Copyright was established in the age of the printing press as an "
Index: philosophy/po/freedom-or-copyright.pot
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/po/freedom-or-copyright.pot,v
retrieving revision 1.4
retrieving revision 1.5
diff -u -b -r1.4 -r1.5
--- philosophy/po/freedom-or-copyright.pot 23 Mar 2010 20:25:53 -0000
1.4
+++ philosophy/po/freedom-or-copyright.pot 29 Apr 2010 08:26:21 -0000
1.5
@@ -7,7 +7,7 @@
msgid ""
msgstr ""
"Project-Id-Version: PACKAGE VERSION\n"
-"POT-Creation-Date: 2010-03-23 16:25-0300\n"
+"POT-Creation-Date: 2010-04-29 04:26-0300\n"
"PO-Revision-Date: YEAR-MO-DA HO:MI+ZONE\n"
"Last-Translator: FULL NAME <address@hidden>\n"
"Language-Team: LANGUAGE <address@hidden>\n"
@@ -29,6 +29,17 @@
# type: Content of: <p>
msgid ""
+"<em>Many points that lead to a conclusion that software freedom must be "
+"universal often apply to other forms of expressive works, albeit in "
+"different ways. This essay concerns the application of principles related to "
+"software freedom to the area of literature. Generally, such issues are "
+"orthogonal to software freedom, but we include essays like this here since "
+"many people interested in Free Software want to know more about how the "
+"principles can be applied to areas other than software.</em>"
+msgstr ""
+
+# type: Content of: <p>
+msgid ""
"Copyright was established in the age of the printing press as an industrial "
"regulation on the business of writing and publishing. The aim was to "
"encourage the publication of a diversity of written works. The means was to "
Index: philosophy/po/push-copyright-aside.bg.po
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/po/push-copyright-aside.bg.po,v
retrieving revision 1.4
retrieving revision 1.5
diff -u -b -r1.4 -r1.5
--- philosophy/po/push-copyright-aside.bg.po 28 Oct 2009 14:51:37 -0000
1.4
+++ philosophy/po/push-copyright-aside.bg.po 29 Apr 2010 08:26:21 -0000
1.5
@@ -6,7 +6,7 @@
msgid ""
msgstr ""
"Project-Id-Version: push-copyright-aside.html\n"
-"POT-Creation-Date: 2009-10-18 04:25-0300\n"
+"POT-Creation-Date: 2010-04-29 04:26-0300\n"
"PO-Revision-Date: 2009-10-28 15:20+0200\n"
"Last-Translator: Yavor Doganov <address@hidden>\n"
"Language-Team: Bulgarian <address@hidden>\n"
@@ -31,6 +31,17 @@
msgstr "Ð¾Ñ <strong>РиÑаÑд Ð. СÑолман</strong>"
# type: Content of: <p>
+msgid ""
+"<em>Many points that lead to a conclusion that software freedom must be "
+"universal often apply to other forms of expressive works, albeit in "
+"different ways. This essay concerns the application of principles related to "
+"software freedom to the area of literature. Generally, such issues are "
+"orthogonal to software freedom, but we include essays like this here since "
+"many people interested in Free Software want to know more about how the "
+"principles can be applied to areas other than software.</em>"
+msgstr ""
+
+# type: Content of: <p>
msgid "<em>This article appeared in <em>Nature Webdebates</em> in 2001</em>"
msgstr ""
"<em>Тази ÑÑаÑÐ¸Ñ Ñе поÑви в <em>âÐейÑÑÑ
ÑебдибейÑÑâ</em> пÑез 2001 г.</em>"
Index: philosophy/po/push-copyright-aside.fr.po
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/po/push-copyright-aside.fr.po,v
retrieving revision 1.5
retrieving revision 1.6
diff -u -b -r1.5 -r1.6
--- philosophy/po/push-copyright-aside.fr.po 30 Nov 2009 21:26:55 -0000
1.5
+++ philosophy/po/push-copyright-aside.fr.po 29 Apr 2010 08:26:21 -0000
1.6
@@ -7,7 +7,7 @@
msgid ""
msgstr ""
"Project-Id-Version: push-copyright-aside.html\n"
-"POT-Creation-Date: 2009-10-18 04:25-0300\n"
+"POT-Creation-Date: 2010-04-29 04:26-0300\n"
"PO-Revision-Date: 2009-11-29 17:53+0100\n"
"Last-Translator: Cédric Corazza <cedric.corazza AT wanadoo.fr>\n"
"Language-Team: French <address@hidden>\n"
@@ -34,6 +34,17 @@
msgstr "par <strong>Richard M. Stallman</strong>"
# type: Content of: <p>
+msgid ""
+"<em>Many points that lead to a conclusion that software freedom must be "
+"universal often apply to other forms of expressive works, albeit in "
+"different ways. This essay concerns the application of principles related to "
+"software freedom to the area of literature. Generally, such issues are "
+"orthogonal to software freedom, but we include essays like this here since "
+"many people interested in Free Software want to know more about how the "
+"principles can be applied to areas other than software.</em>"
+msgstr ""
+
+# type: Content of: <p>
msgid "<em>This article appeared in <em>Nature Webdebates</em> in 2001</em>"
msgstr "<em>Cet article est paru dans <em>Nature Webdebates</em> en 2001</em>"
Index: philosophy/po/push-copyright-aside.pot
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/po/push-copyright-aside.pot,v
retrieving revision 1.3
retrieving revision 1.4
diff -u -b -r1.3 -r1.4
--- philosophy/po/push-copyright-aside.pot 18 Oct 2009 08:26:43 -0000
1.3
+++ philosophy/po/push-copyright-aside.pot 29 Apr 2010 08:26:21 -0000
1.4
@@ -7,7 +7,7 @@
msgid ""
msgstr ""
"Project-Id-Version: PACKAGE VERSION\n"
-"POT-Creation-Date: 2009-10-18 04:25-0300\n"
+"POT-Creation-Date: 2010-04-29 04:26-0300\n"
"PO-Revision-Date: YEAR-MO-DA HO:MI+ZONE\n"
"Last-Translator: FULL NAME <address@hidden>\n"
"Language-Team: LANGUAGE <address@hidden>\n"
@@ -30,6 +30,17 @@
msgstr ""
# type: Content of: <p>
+msgid ""
+"<em>Many points that lead to a conclusion that software freedom must be "
+"universal often apply to other forms of expressive works, albeit in "
+"different ways. This essay concerns the application of principles related to "
+"software freedom to the area of literature. Generally, such issues are "
+"orthogonal to software freedom, but we include essays like this here since "
+"many people interested in Free Software want to know more about how the "
+"principles can be applied to areas other than software.</em>"
+msgstr ""
+
+# type: Content of: <p>
msgid "<em>This article appeared in <em>Nature Webdebates</em> in 2001</em>"
msgstr ""
Index: philosophy/po/push-copyright-aside.tr.po
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/po/push-copyright-aside.tr.po,v
retrieving revision 1.1
retrieving revision 1.2
diff -u -b -r1.1 -r1.2
--- philosophy/po/push-copyright-aside.tr.po 12 Jan 2010 15:09:44 -0000
1.1
+++ philosophy/po/push-copyright-aside.tr.po 29 Apr 2010 08:26:21 -0000
1.2
@@ -11,7 +11,7 @@
msgid ""
msgstr ""
"Project-Id-Version: push-copyright-aside.html\n"
-"POT-Creation-Date: 2009-10-18 04:25-0300\n"
+"POT-Creation-Date: 2010-04-29 04:26-0300\n"
"PO-Revision-Date: 2010-01-12 16:07+0100\n"
"Last-Translator: Tahir Emre Kalaycı <address@hidden>\n"
"Language-Team: Turkish <address@hidden>\n"
@@ -37,6 +37,17 @@
msgstr "Yazan: <strong>Richard M. Stallman</strong>"
# type: Content of: <p>
+msgid ""
+"<em>Many points that lead to a conclusion that software freedom must be "
+"universal often apply to other forms of expressive works, albeit in "
+"different ways. This essay concerns the application of principles related to "
+"software freedom to the area of literature. Generally, such issues are "
+"orthogonal to software freedom, but we include essays like this here since "
+"many people interested in Free Software want to know more about how the "
+"principles can be applied to areas other than software.</em>"
+msgstr ""
+
+# type: Content of: <p>
msgid "<em>This article appeared in <em>Nature Webdebates</em> in 2001</em>"
msgstr "<em>Bu yazı 2001'de <em>Nature Webdebates</em>'de
yayınlanmıÅtır</em>"
Index: server/body-include-2.el.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/server/body-include-2.el.html,v
retrieving revision 1.6
retrieving revision 1.7
diff -u -b -r1.6 -r1.7
--- server/body-include-2.el.html 27 Apr 2010 08:25:59 -0000 1.6
+++ server/body-include-2.el.html 29 Apr 2010 08:26:24 -0000 1.7
@@ -21,10 +21,10 @@
<div id="navigation">
<div class="inner">
<ul>
- <li id="tabPhilosophy"><a
href="/philosophy/philosophy.html">ΦιλοÏοÏία</a></li>
+ <li id="tabPhilosophy"><a
href="/philosophy/philosophy.el.html">ΦιλοÏοÏία</a></li>
<li id="tabLicenses"><a
href="/licenses/licenses.el.html">ÎδειεÏ</a></li>
<li id="tabSoftware"><a
href="/software/software.el.html">ÎεÏαÏοÏÏÏÏειÏ</a></li>
- <li id="tabDoc"><a href="/doc/doc.html">ΤεκμηÏίÏÏη</a></li>
+ <li id="tabDoc"><a
href="/doc/doc.el.html">ΤεκμηÏίÏÏη</a></li>
<li><a
href="/help/help.el.html">ÎοηθήÏÏε Ïο GNU</a></li>
<li id="joinfsftab"><a
href="https://www.fsf.org/associate/support_freedom?referrer=4052";>ÎίνεÏε
μÎÎ»Î¿Ï ÏοÏ
ÎÎÎ!</a></li>
Index: philosophy/philosophy.el.html
===================================================================
RCS file: philosophy/philosophy.el.html
diff -N philosophy/philosophy.el.html
--- /dev/null 1 Jan 1970 00:00:00 -0000
+++ philosophy/philosophy.el.html 29 Apr 2010 08:26:19 -0000 1.1
@@ -0,0 +1,231 @@
+
+
+<!--#include virtual="/server/header.el.html" -->
+
+<!-- This file is automatically generated by GNUnited Nations! -->
+<title>ΦιλοÏοÏία ÏοÏ
ÎÏγοÏ
GNU - ÎÏγο GNU - ÎδÏÏ
μα
ÎλεÏθεÏοÏ
ÎογιÏÎ¼Î¹ÎºÎ¿Ï (ÎÎÎ)</title>
+
+<!--#include virtual="/server/banner.el.html" -->
+<h2>ΦιλοÏοÏία ÏοÏ
ÎÏγοÏ
GNU</h2>
+
+<p>ΠανάÏÏÏ
ξη αÏÏ ÎµÎ¼Î¬Ï ÏοÏ
ελεÏθεÏοÏ
λογιÏÎ¼Î¹ÎºÎ¿Ï Î»ÎµÎ¹ÏοÏ
ÏÎ³Î¹ÎºÎ¿Ï ÏÏ
ÏÏήμαÏÎ¿Ï GNU
+ÏαÏακινείÏαι αÏÏ Ïη ÏιλοÏοÏία ÏοÏ
κινήμαÏÎ¿Ï ÎµÎ»ÎµÏθεÏοÏ
λογιÏμικοÏ. Î Ïελίδα
+αÏ
Ïή ÏαÏÎÏει μια ειÏαγÏγή Ïε ÏοÏÏη Ïη
ÏιλοÏοÏία, ÏÏ
νδÎÏμοÏ
Ï ÏÏα Ïιο ÏÏÏÏÏαÏα
+άÏθÏα ÏοÏ
ÎÏοÏ
με ÏÎ¬Î½Ï Ïε αÏ
ÏÏ Ïο θÎμα και ÏÏ
νδÎÏμοÏ
Ï Ïε ÏεÏαιÏÎÏÏ ÏηγÎÏ.</p>
+
+<h3 id="new">Î ÏÏÏÏαÏα άÏθÏα</h3>
+<p>ÎεÏÏά αÏÏ ÏÎ¹Ï ÏÏÎÏÏεÏ, ÎµÎ´Ï ÎµÎ¯Î½Î±Î¹ Ïα Ïιο
ÏÏÏÏÏαÏα δημοÏιεÏ
μÎνα άÏθÏα ÏÏεÏικά
+με Ïο ελεÏθεÏο λογιÏÎ¼Î¹ÎºÏ ÎºÎ±Î¹ Ïο ÎÏγο GNU.</p>
+<ul>
+ <li> <a
+href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/blog/2010/apr/06/digital-economy-bill-richard-stallman";>ÎÏζÎνÏα
+ÏηÏÎ¹Î±ÎºÎ®Ï Î¿Î¹ÎºÎ¿Î½Î¿Î¼Î¯Î±Ï: ÎÎ½Î±Ï ÎºÎ»ÏοÏ
ν Ïο ÎδÏÏε
και οι άλλοι κλÏοÏ
ν Ïο άÏÏαξαν</a></li>
+ <li><a href="/philosophy/who-does-that-server-really-serve.html">Ποιον
+ÏÏαγμαÏικά εξÏ
ÏηÏεÏεί αÏ
ÏÏÏ Î¿ εξÏ
ÏηÏεÏηÏήÏ;</a></li>
+ <li><a href="/philosophy/public-domain-manifesto.html">ÎιαÏί δεν
θα Ï
ÏογÏάÏÏ Ïο
+ÎανιÏÎÏÏο ÎημÏÏÎ¹Î±Ï Î§ÏήÏÎ·Ï (Public Domain
Manifesto)</a></li>
+ <li><a href="/philosophy/selling-exceptions.html">ΣÏεÏικά με ÏιÏ
εξαιÏÎÏειÏ
+ÏÏλήÏεÏν ÏÏη GNU GPL</a></li>
+ <li><a href="/philosophy/lest-codeplex-perplex.html">Îια να μην
ÏεÏιÏλÎκεÏÏε αÏÏ
+Ïο CodePlex</a></li>
+ <li><a href="/philosophy/danger-of-software-patents.html">ΠκίνδÏ
Î½Î¿Ï ÏÏν
+ÏαÏενÏÏν λογιÏμικοÏ</a></li>
+</ul>
+
+<h3 id="aboutfs">ΣÏεÏικά με Ïο ÎλεÏθεÏο
ÎογιÏμικÏ</h3>
+<p>
+Το ελεÏθεÏο λογιÏÎ¼Î¹ÎºÏ ÎµÎ¯Î½Î±Î¹ ζήÏημα ελεÏ
θεÏίαÏ: οι άνθÏÏÏοι θα ÎÏÏεÏε να
+είναι ελεÏθεÏοι να ÏÏηÏιμοÏοιοÏν Ïο
λογιÏÎ¼Î¹ÎºÏ Î¼Îµ ÏλοÏ
Ï ÏοÏ
Ï ÏÏÏÏοÏ
Ï ÏοÏ
+είναι κοινÏνικά ÏÏήÏιμοι. Το λογιÏμικÏ
διαÏÎÏει αÏÏ Ïα Ï
λικά
+ανÏικείμενα—ÏÏÏÏ ÎºÎ±ÏÎκλεÏ, ÏάνÏοÏ
ιÏÏ
και βενζίνη—ÏÏο ÏÏι μÏοÏεί
+να ανÏιγÏαÏεί και αλλαÏθεί ÏάÏα ÏÎ¿Î»Ï ÎµÏ
κολÏÏεÏα. Îι δÏ
ναÏÏÏηÏÎµÏ Î±Ï
ÏÎÏ
+κάνοÏ
ν Ïο λογιÏÎ¼Î¹ÎºÏ ÏÏÏο ÏÏήÏιμο ÏÏο
είναι· ÏιÏÏεÏοÏ
με ÏÏÏ Î¿Î¹ ÏÏήÏÏÎµÏ ÏοÏ
+λογιÏÎ¼Î¹ÎºÎ¿Ï Î¸Î± ÎÏÏεÏε να μÏοÏοÏν να ÏιÏ
ÏÏηÏιμοÏοιοÏν.</p>
+
+<!-- I don't think it's good idea to link specific translation -->
+<!-- (e.g. foo.fr.html) from here. It would be better to link them -->
+<!-- from philosophy.fr.html and the original documents. -mhatta -->
+<ul>
+ <li><a href="/philosophy/free-sw.html">Τι είναι Ïο ÎλεÏθεÏο
ÎογιÏμικÏ;</a></li>
+ <li><a href="/philosophy/why-free.html">ÎιαÏί Ïο λογιÏμικÏ
δεν ÏÏÎÏει να ÎÏει
+ιδιοκÏήÏεÏ</a></li>
+ <li><a href="/philosophy/pragmatic.html">Copyleft:
ÏÏαγμαÏιÏÏικÏÏ Î¹Î´ÎµÎ±Î»Î¹ÏμÏÏ</a></li>
+ <li><a href="/philosophy/free-doc.html">ÎιαÏί Ïο ελεÏθεÏο
λογιÏÎ¼Î¹ÎºÏ ÏÏειάζεÏαι
+ελεÏθεÏη ÏεκμηÏίÏÏη</a></li>
+ <li><a href="/philosophy/selling.html">Î ÏÏληÏη ελεÏθεÏοÏ
λογιÏμικοÏ</a> είναι
+ενÏάξει!</li>
+ <li><a href="/philosophy/fs-motives.html">ÎίνηÏÏα για Ïη ÏÏ
γγÏαÏή ελεÏθεÏοÏ
+λογιÏμικοÏ</a></li>
+ <li><a href="/philosophy/right-to-read.html">Το δικαίÏμα ÏÏην
ανάγνÏÏη: Îια
+ÎÏ
ÏÏοÏιανή ÏÏνÏομη ιÏÏοÏία</a> αÏÏ Ïο <a
href="http://www.stallman.org/";>
+Richard Stallman</a></li>
+ <li><a href="/philosophy/open-source-misses-the-point.html">ÎιαÏί ο
+“ÎνοιÏÏÏÏ ÎÏδικαϔ Ïάνει Ïο
ÏÏοκείμενο ÏοÏ
ÎλεÏθεÏοÏ
+ÎογιÏμικοÏ</a></li>
+</ul>
+
+<h3>ΣÏνδεÏμοι Ïε ÏεÏιÏÏÏÏεÏα άÏθÏα
ÏιλοÏοÏίαÏ</h3>
+
+<p>ÎÏοÏ
με ÏÎ¿Î»Ï ÏεÏιÏÏÏÏεÏα άÏθÏα αÏÏ Î±Ï
Ïά
ÏοÏ
μÏοÏοÏν να ÏÏÏÎÏοÏ
ν Ïε μία μÏνο
+Ïελίδα. ÎÏοÏείÏε να Ïα βÏείÏε ÏÏÎ¹Ï ÏελίδεÏ
ÏοÏ
ÏÏ
νδÎονÏαι αÏÏ ÎµÎ´Ï.</p>
+
+<ul>
+<li id="EssaysAndArticles"><a href="/philosophy/essays-and-articles.html">
Îοκίμια και άÏθÏα.</a> Îια
+ÏειÏά αÏÏ Î¬ÏθÏα ÏοÏ
ÏεÏιγÏάÏοÏ
ν Ïη
ÏιλοÏοÏία ÏοÏ
κινήμαÏÎ¿Ï ÎµÎ»ÎµÏθεÏοÏ
+λογιÏμικοÏ, Ïο οÏοίο είναι η ÏθηÏη για Ïην
ανάÏÏÏ
ξη αÏÏ ÎµÎ¼Î¬Ï ÏοÏ
ελεÏθεÏοÏ
+λογιÏÎ¼Î¹ÎºÎ¿Ï Î»ÎµÎ¹ÏοÏ
ÏÎ³Î¹ÎºÎ¿Ï ÏÏ
ÏÏήμαÏÎ¿Ï GNU.</li>
+
+<li id="Speeches"><a
href="/philosophy/speeches-and-interview.html">ÎÎ¼Î¹Î»Î¯ÎµÏ ÎºÎ±Î¹
+ÏÏ
νενÏεÏξειÏ.</a> ΣÏνδεÏμοι Ïε ÏÏ
νενÏεÏξειÏ
και μεÏαγÏαÏÎÏ Î¿Î¼Î¹Î»Î¹Ïν ÏÏεÏικά
+με Ïο ελεÏθεÏο λογιÏÎ¼Î¹ÎºÏ ÎºÎ±Î¹ Ïο ÎÏγο GNU.</li>
+
+<li id="History"><a href="/gnu/gnu.html">ÎÏÏοÏία ÏοÏ
GNU, και ÏÏ
ζήÏηÏη για Ïο GNU και Ïο
+Linux.</a></li>
+
+<li id="ThirdPartyIdeas"><a
href="/philosophy/third-party-ideas.html">ÎδÎÎµÏ ÏÏίÏÏν
μεÏÏν.</a> Τα
+άÏθÏα αÏ
Ïά δίνοÏ
ν ÏÎ¹Ï ÏιλοÏοÏικÎÏ Î³Î½ÏμεÏ
άλλÏν ανθÏÏÏÏν ÏÏÎ¿Ï Ï
ÏοÏÏήÏιξη ÏοÏ
+ελεÏθεÏοÏ
λογιÏμικοÏ, ή ÏÏεÏιζÏμενÏν
ζηÏημάÏÏν, και δεν μιλοÏν εκ μÎÏοÏ
Ï ÏοÏ
+ÎÏγοÏ
GNU—αλλά ÏÏ
μÏÏνοÏμε λιγÏÏεÏο ή
ÏεÏιÏÏÏÏεÏο μ' αÏ
ÏÎÏ.</li>
+</ul>
+
+<p>
+
+<!-- please leave both these ID attributes here. ... -->
+<!-- ... we removed this as an H$ section as it was duplicating the -->
+<!-- same information on links.html, but it's possible that some users -->
+<!-- have the URLs bookmarked or on their pages. -len -->
+<a id="TOCFreedomOrganizations">ÎμείÏ</a> <a
+id="FreedomOrganizations">εÏίÏηÏ</a> διαÏηÏοÏμε μια
λίÏÏα αÏÏ <a
+href="/links/links.html#FreedomOrganizations">ÎÏγανιÏμοί ÏοÏ
εÏγάζονÏαι για
+Ïην ελεÏ
θεÏία ÏÏην ανάÏÏÏ
ξη Ï
ÏολογιÏÏÏν
και ÏÎ¹Ï Î·Î»ÎµÎºÏÏονικÎÏ
+εÏικοινÏνίεÏ</a>.</p>
+
+
+<div style="font-size: small;">
+
+<!--TRANSLATORS: Use space (SPC) as msgstr if you don't have notes.-->
+ </div>
+</div>
+
+<!--#include virtual="/server/footer.el.html" -->
+<div id="footer">
+<p>
+ΠαÏακαλοÏμε ÏÏείλÏε εÏÏÏήÏÎµÎ¹Ï Î³Î¹Î± Ïα ÎÎÎ
& GNU ÏÏο <a
+href="mailto:address@hidden";><address@hidden></a>. Î¥ÏάÏÏοÏ
ν
εÏίÏÎ·Ï <a
+href="/contact/">άλλοι ÏÏÏÏοι για να
εÏικοινÏνήÏεÏε</a> με Ïο ÎÎÎ. <br />
+ΠαÏακαλοÏμε ÏÏείλÏε ανενεÏγοÏÏ ÏÏ
νδÎÏμοÏ
Ï ÎºÎ±Î¹ Î¬Î»Î»ÎµÏ Î´Î¹Î¿ÏθÏÏÎµÎ¹Ï Î® ÏÏοÏάÏειÏ
+ÏÏο <a href="mailto:address@hidden";><address@hidden></a>.
+</p>
+
+<p>
+ΠαÏακαλοÏμε δείÏε Ïο <a
+href="/server/standards/README.translations.html">ÎεÏαÏÏάÏειÏ
README</a> για
+ÏληÏοÏοÏÎ¯ÎµÏ ÏÏεÏικά με Ïο ÏÏ
νÏονιÏÎ¼Ï ÎºÎ±Î¹
Ïην Ï
Ïοβολή μεÏαÏÏάÏεÏν αÏ
ÏÎ¿Ï ÏοÏ
+άÏθÏοÏ
.
+</p>
+
+<p>
+ΠνεÏ
μαÏικά δικαιÏμαÏα © 1996, 1997, 1998, 1999, 2000,
2001, 2002, 2003,
+2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010 ÎδÏÏ
μα ÎλεÏθεÏοÏ
ÎογιÏμικοÏ, Inc.</p>
+<p>ÎÏιÏÏÎÏεÏαι η καÏά λÎξη ανÏιγÏαÏή και
διανομή ÏλοÏ
αÏ
ÏÎ¿Ï ÏοÏ
άÏθÏοÏ
Ïε κάθε
+μÎÏο, με Ïην ÏÏοÏÏÏθεÏη ÏÏι αÏ
Ïή η
ειδοÏοίηÏη διαÏηÏείÏαι.
+</p>
+
+
+<div class="translators-credits">
+
+<!--TRANSLATORS: Use space (SPC) as msgstr if you don't want credits.-->
+ÎεÏάÏÏαÏη ÏÏα ελληνικά: <a
+href="http://savannah.gnu.org/users/gzarkadas";>ÎεÏÏγιοÏ
ÎαÏκάδαÏ</a> (2010).</div>
+ <p>
+<!-- timestamp start -->
+ÎνημεÏÏθηκε:
+
+$Date: 2010/04/29 08:26:19 $
+
+<!-- timestamp end -->
+</p>
+</div>
+
+<!-- All pages on the GNU web server should have the section about -->
+<!-- verbatim copying. Please do NOT remove this without talking -->
+<!-- with the webmasters first. -->
+<!-- Please make sure the copyright date is consistent with the document -->
+<!-- and that it is like this "2001, 2002" not this "2001-2002." -->
+<div id="translations">
+<h4>ÎεÏαÏÏάÏÎµÎ¹Ï Î±Ï
ÏÎ®Ï ÏÎ·Ï ÏελίδαÏ</h4>
+
+<!-- Please keep this list alphabetical by language code.
+ Comment what the language is for each type, i.e. de is German.
+ Write the language name in its own language (Deutsch) in the text.
+ If you add a new language here, please
+ advise address@hidden and add it to
+ - /home/www/html/server/standards/README.translations.html
+ - one of the lists under the section "Translations Underway"
+ - if there is a translation team, you also have to add an alias
+ to mail.gnu.org:/com/mailer/aliases
+ Please also check you have the language code right; see:
+ http://www.loc.gov/standards/iso639-2/php/code_list.php
+ If the 2-letter ISO 639-1 code is not available,
+ use the 3-letter ISO 639-2.
+ Please use W3C normative character entities. -->
+<ul class="translations-list">
+<!-- Arabic -->
+<li><a
href="/philosophy/philosophy.ar.html">العربية</a> [ar]</li>
+<!-- Bulgarian -->
+<li><a
href="/philosophy/philosophy.bg.html">български</a> [bg]</li>
+<!-- Bosnian -->
+<li><a href="/philosophy/philosophy.bs.html">bosanski</a> [bs]</li>
+<!-- Catalan -->
+<li><a href="/philosophy/philosophy.ca.html">català</a> [ca]</li>
+<!-- Czech -->
+<li><a href="/philosophy/philosophy.cs.html">Česky</a> [cs]</li>
+<!-- Danish -->
+<li><a href="/philosophy/philosophy.da.html">dansk</a> [da]</li>
+<!-- German -->
+<li><a href="/philosophy/philosophy.de.html">Deutsch</a> [de]</li>
+<!-- Greek -->
+<li><a
href="/philosophy/philosophy.el.html">Ελληνικά</a> [el]</li>
+<!-- English -->
+<li><a href="/philosophy/philosophy.html">English</a> [en]</li>
+<!-- Spanish -->
+<li><a href="/philosophy/philosophy.es.html">español</a> [es]</li>
+<!-- Finnish -->
+<li><a href="/philosophy/philosophy.fi.html">suomi</a> [fi]</li>
+<!-- French -->
+<li><a href="/philosophy/philosophy.fr.html">français</a> [fr]</li>
+<!-- Galician -->
+<li><a href="/philosophy/philosophy.gl.html">galego</a> [gl]</li>
+<!-- Hebrew -->
+<li><a
href="/philosophy/philosophy.he.html">עברית</a> [he]</li>
+<!-- Hungarian -->
+<li><a href="/philosophy/philosophy.hu.html">magyar</a> [hu]</li>
+<!-- Indonesian -->
+<li><a href="/philosophy/philosophy.id.html">Bahasa
Indonesia</a> [id]</li>
+<!-- Italian -->
+<li><a href="/philosophy/philosophy.it.html">italiano</a> [it]</li>
+<!-- Japanese -->
+<li><a
href="/philosophy/philosophy.ja.html">日本語</a> [ja]</li>
+<!-- Korean -->
+<li><a
href="/philosophy/philosophy.ko.html">한국어</a> [ko]</li>
+<!-- Macedonian -->
+<li><a
href="/philosophy/philosophy.mk.html">македонски</a> [mk]</li>
+<!-- Dutch -->
+<li><a href="/philosophy/philosophy.nl.html">Nederlands</a> [nl]</li>
+<!-- Polish -->
+<li><a href="/philosophy/philosophy.pl.html">polski</a> [pl]</li>
+<!-- Brazilian Portuguese -->
+<li><a href="/philosophy/philosophy.pt-br.html">português do
Brasil</a> [pt-br]</li>
+<!-- Romanian -->
+<li><a
href="/philosophy/philosophy.ro.html">română</a> [ro]</li>
+<!-- Russian -->
+<li><a
href="/philosophy/philosophy.ru.html">русский</a> [ru]</li>
+<!-- Serbian -->
+<li><a
href="/philosophy/philosophy.sr.html">српски</a> [sr]</li>
+<!-- Chinese (Traditional) -->
+<li><a
href="/philosophy/philosophy.zh-tw.html">繁體中文</a> [zh-tw]</li>
+</ul>
+</div>
+</div>
+</body>
+</html>
Index: philosophy/pirate-party.cs.html
===================================================================
RCS file: philosophy/pirate-party.cs.html
diff -N philosophy/pirate-party.cs.html
--- /dev/null 1 Jan 1970 00:00:00 -0000
+++ philosophy/pirate-party.cs.html 29 Apr 2010 08:26:19 -0000 1.1
@@ -0,0 +1,185 @@
+
+<!--#include virtual="/server/header.cs.html" -->
+
+<!-- This file is automatically generated by GNUnited Nations! -->
+<title>Jak švédská Pirátská strana podkopává svobodný software</title>
+
+<!--#include virtual="/server/banner.cs.html" -->
+<h2>Jak švédská Pirátská strana podkopává svobodný software</h2>
+
+<p>od Richarda Stallmana</p>
+
+<p>Å ikana ze strany vlastnÃků autorských práv podnÃtila ve Å védsku
vznik
+prvnÃpolitické strany, jež má ve vÃnku redukci ochrany autorských práv;
+Pirátskoustranu. Mezi jejÃmi tezemi můžeme najÃt: zákaz správy
digitálnÃch
+práv(digital restrictions management - DRM), legalizaci nekomerÄnÃho
sdÃlenÃ
+publikovaných pracà a zkrácenà doby platnosti autorských práv pÅi
komerÄnÃm
+užità na pÄt let. Po pÄti letech od vydánÃ, by se každá publikovaná
práce
+stalasouÄástà veÅejné domény (public domain).</p>
+
+<p>ObecnÄ ÅeÄeno: tyto zmÄny podporuji. Ironicky, podoba tÄchto zmÄn
+zvolenášvédskou Pirátskou stranou podkopává svobodný software. Jsem si
jist,
+ženezamýšleli svobodný software poÅ¡kodit, pÅesto je to to, co by se
stalo.</p>
+
+<p>GNU General Public License a ostatnà copyleftové licence použÃvajÃ
+autorsképrávo k obranÄ svobody každého uživatele. GPL vÅ¡em povoluje
+Å¡ÃÅenÃupravených pracÃ, ale pouze pod tou samou licencÃ. Å ÃÅenÃ
nepozmÄnÄné
+prácetaktéž vyžaduje zachovánà licence. StejnÄ tak vÅ¡ichni Å¡iÅitelé
+musÃuživatelům umožnit pÅÃstup ke zdrojovému kódu softwaru.</p>
+
+<p>Jak by tedy základnà teze švédské Pirátské strany postihly svobodný
+softwarepod copyleftovou licencÃ? Za pÄt let by jejich zdrojové kódy se
+stalysouÄástà veÅejné domény a vývojáÅi proprietárnÃho softwaru by
ho
+mohlizaÄlenit do svých programů. A jak že to vypadá v pÅÃpadÄ
opaÄném?</p>
+
+<p>Proprietárnà software je omezený licenÄnÃm ujednánÃm pro koncového
+uživatele(EULA), tedy nejen autorským právem, a uživatelé navÃc nemajÃ
jeho
+zdrojovýkód. I pokud by autorské právo povolovalo nekomerÄnà sdÃlenÃ,
EULA
+ho můžezakazovat. NavÃc: uživatelé, nemajÃce zdrojové kódy, nemajÃ
vliv na
+to, coprogram dÄlá, když ho spustÃ. SpouÅ¡tÄnÃm takového programu se
své
+svobodyvzdáváte a pÅenecháváte vývojáÅi vládu nad sebou samými.</p>
+
+<p>Jaký následek by mÄlo ukonÄenà autorských práv k programu po
uplynutà pÄti
+let?SouÄasný návrh by nevyžadoval, aby vývojáŠuvolnil zdrojový kód,
a dá se
+pÅedpokládat, že vÄtÅ¡ina by to dobrovolnÄ ani nikdy
+neudÄlala. Uživatelům,poÅád bez pÅÃstupu ke zdrojovému kódu, by nebylo
+umožnÄno použÃvat programve svobodném duchu. Program by dokonce mohl mÃt
+„Äasovanoubombu“, která by zajistila, že po pÄti letech
pÅestane
+fungovat; v tompÅÃpadÄ by kopie ve „veÅejné doménÄ“ vůbec
+nefungovaly.</p>
+
+<p>Tedy, podle návrhu Pirátské strany by za pÄt let vývojáÅi
+proprietárnÃhosoftwaru dostali k využità kód pod GPL, ale vývojáÅi
+svobodného softwaruby na oplátku nedostali kód proprietárnÃ; ne za pÄt
+dokonce let ani za padesátlet ne. Svobodný svÄt by dostal to Å¡patné, ale
ne
+to dobré. RozdÃl mezizdrojovým kódem a objektovým kódem na stranÄ
jedné a
+praxà v použÃvánÃlicenÄnÃch ujednánà pro koncového uživatele na
stranÄ druhé
+by, dal proprietárnÃmu softwaru faktickou výjimku ze vÅ¡eobecného pravidla
o
+pÄtiletéochranÄ autorských práv — tu by ale svobodný software
+nesdÃlel.</p>
+
+<p>V neposlednà ÅadÄ použÃváme autorské právo k ÄásteÄnému
odstÃnÄnÃ
+nebezpeÄÃsoftwarových patentů. Nedokážeme zajistit, že naÅ¡e programy
jsou od
+problémůs nimi spojenými oproÅ¡tÄné (v zemi, která je zavede, nebude
nikdy
+žádnýprogram v bezpeÄÃ), ale alespoÅ patentům zabraÅujeme, aby udÄlaly
+program fakticky nesvobodným. Å védská Pirátská strana navrhuje zruÅ¡enÃ
+softwarových patentů, a pokud by se tak i stalo, tento problém by
+zmizel. Ale dokud toho dosaženo nenÃ, nesmÃme ztratit naÅ¡i jedinou obranu
+pÅed patenty.</p>
+
+<p>Když švédská Pirátská strana oznámila své základnà teze,
vývojáÅi
+svobodnéhosoftwaru si vÅ¡imli tohoto následku a zaÄali navrhovat zvláštnÃ
+pravidlo prosvobodný software - pro ten by autorské právo trvalo déle,
takže
+by mohlo dálepokraÄovat v Å¡ÃÅenà pod copyleftem. Tato výslovná
výjimka pro
+svobodnýsoftware by vyvážila onu faktickou výjimku pro proprietárnÃ
+software.MyslÃm, že i jenom desetiletá výjimka by mÄla staÄit. AvÅ¡ak
tento
+návrh sesetkal s odporem u lÃdrů Pirátské strany, kteÅà se stavÄli
proti
+ideji delÅ¡Ãplatnosti autorského práva v nÄjakém speciálnÃm
pÅÃpadÄ.</p>
+
+<p>Dokázal bych podpoÅit právnà úpravu, která by po uplynutà pÄti let
+zajistilauvolnÄnà zdrojového kódu GPL softwaru do veÅejné domény pod
+podmÃnkou, že tosamé bude platit pro proprietárnà zdrojový kód. Konec
konců
+copyleft je jenprostÅedek vedoucà ke konci – svobodÄ
+uživatelů – ne koncem samotným. A osobnÄ bych nerad obhajoval
+silnÄjÅ¡Ã ochranu autorských práv.</p>
+
+<p>Takže jsem navrhl, aÅ¥ programové teze Pirátské strany požadujÃ, aby v
+dobÄuvolnÄnà binárnÃch souborů byl zdrojový kód vydán “do
+úschovy”.Takto “uschovaný” zdrojový kód by mohl být po
+pÄti letech uvolnÄn do veÅejné domény. SpÃÅ¡e než dÄlat ze svobodného
+softwaru oficiálnà výjimku v pÄtileté ochranÄ autorských práv, toto by
+eliminovalo neoficiálnà výjimku proprietárnÃho softwaru. AÅ¥ tak Äi onak,
+výsledek je férový.</p>
+
+<p>Jeden pÅÃvrženec Pirátské strany navrhl obecnÄjÅ¡Ã variantu onoho
prvnÃho
+návrhu: obecné schéma, dÃky kterému autorská práva trvajà déle, pokud
je
+veÅejnosti dáváno vÃce svobody pÅi využÃvánà dané práce. Výhoda
+tohotopÅÃstupu je ta, že svobodný software se stává obecnÄjÅ¡Ãho
Å¡irÅ¡Ãho
+proudu pracà se vzájemnÄ se liÅ¡ÃcÃmi licencemi a ne osamÄlou
výjimkou.</p>
+
+<p>Preferoval bych ÅeÅ¡enà “úschovou”, ale jakákoliv z tÄchto
metod
+by pÅedeÅ¡la specifickému pÅedpojatému úÄinku proti svobodnému
+softwaru. Můžou zde být i dalÅ¡Ã ÅeÅ¡enÃ, která by mohla být stejnÄ
dobrá,
+jako ta už zmÃnÄná. AÅ¥ tak Äi onak, Å¡védská Pirátská strana by
mÄla pÅedejÃt
+uvalenà hendikepu na hnutà ochraÅujÃcà veÅejnosti pÅed záškodnickými
obry.</p>
+
+
+<div style="font-size: small;">
+
+<!--TRANSLATORS: Use space (SPC) as msgstr if you don't have notes.-->
+ </div>
+</div>
+
+<!--#include virtual="/server/footer.cs.html" -->
+<div id="footer">
+
+<p>
+Dotazy ohlednÄ FSF a GNU na <a
+href="mailto:address@hidden";><address@hidden></a>. Jsou zde také
dalšà <a
+href="/contact/">možnosti</a>, jak FSF kontaktovat. <br /> NefungujÃcÃodkazy
+a jiné opravy a návrhy posÃlejte na <a
+href="mailto:address@hidden";><address@hidden></a>.
+</p>
+
+<p>
+PodÃvejte se prosÃm na <a
+href="/server/standards/README.translations.html">pÅekladové README</a> pro
+informace o koordinaci a zasÃlánà pÅekladů tohoto Älánku.
+</p>
+
+<p>Copyright © 2009 Richard Stallman</p>
+
+<p>Tato práce je lincencována pod Creative Commons Attribution-No
+DerivativeWorks 3.0 United States License. Kopie této licence: <a
+href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/3.0/us/";>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/3.0/us/</a>.
+Nebo pošlete dopis na adresu: Creative Commons, 171 Second Street, Suite
+300, San Francisco, California, 94105, USA.</p>
+
+
+<div class="translators-credits">
+
+<!--TRANSLATORS: Use space (SPC) as msgstr if you don't want credits.-->
+<b>PÅeklad</b>: Michal Nowak <a
+href="mailto:address@hidden";><address@hidden></a>,
+2010.</div>
+ <p>
+<!-- timestamp start -->
+Aktualizováno:
+
+$Date: 2010/04/29 08:26:19 $
+
+<!-- timestamp end -->
+</p>
+</div>
+
+<div id="translations">
+<h4>PÅeklady této stránky</h4>
+
+<!-- Please keep this list alphabetical by language code.
+ Comment what the language is for each type, i.e. de is German.
+ Write the language name in its own language (Deutsch) in the text.
+ If you add a new language here, please
+ advise address@hidden and add it to
+ - /home/www/html/server/standards/README.translations.html
+ - one of the lists under the section "Translations Underway"
+ - if there is a translation team, you also have to add an alias
+ to mail.gnu.org:/com/mailer/aliases
+ Please also check you have the language code right; see:
+ http://www.loc.gov/standards/iso639-2/php/code_list.php
+ If the 2-letter ISO 639-1 code is not available,
+ use the 3-letter ISO 639-2.
+ Please use W3C normative character entities. -->
+<ul class="translations-list">
+<!-- Czech -->
+<li><a href="/philosophy/pirate-party.cs.html">Česky</a> [cs]</li>
+<!-- English -->
+<li><a href="/philosophy/pirate-party.html">English</a> [en]</li>
+<!-- French -->
+<li><a
href="/philosophy/pirate-party.fr.html">français</a> [fr]</li>
+<!-- Italian -->
+<li><a href="/philosophy/pirate-party.it.html">Italiano</a> [it]</li>
+</ul>
+</div>
+</div>
+</body>
+</html>
| [Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread] |
- www doc/doc.ca.html philosophy/free-sw.af.html ...,
Yavor Doganov <=