www/distros/po common-distros.fr.po common-dist...

[Yavor Doganov]

CVSROOT:        /web/www
Module name:    www
Changes by:     Yavor Doganov <yavor>   10/02/08 21:25:44

Modified files:
        distros/po     : common-distros.fr.po common-distros.pot 

Log message:
        Automatic update by GNUnited Nations.

CVSWeb URLs:
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/distros/po/common-distros.fr.po?cvsroot=www&r1=1.9&r2=1.10
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/distros/po/common-distros.pot?cvsroot=www&r1=1.4&r2=1.5

Patches:
Index: common-distros.fr.po
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/distros/po/common-distros.fr.po,v
retrieving revision 1.9
retrieving revision 1.10
diff -u -b -r1.9 -r1.10
--- common-distros.fr.po        18 Jan 2010 09:26:25 -0000      1.9
+++ common-distros.fr.po        8 Feb 2010 21:25:41 -0000       1.10
@@ -6,7 +6,7 @@
 msgid ""
 msgstr ""
 "Project-Id-Version: common-distros.html\n"
-"POT-Creation-Date: 2010-01-17 16:25-0500\n"
+"POT-Creation-Date: 2010-02-08 16:25-0500\n"
 "PO-Revision-Date: 2009-12-12 16:03+0100\n"
 "Last-Translator: Cédric Corazza <cedric.corazza AT wanadoo.fr>\n"
 "Language-Team: French <address@hidden>\n"
@@ -259,15 +259,12 @@
 
 # type: Content of: <p>
 msgid ""
-"Red Hat's enterprise distribution doesn't seem to have a clear policy about "
-"what software can be included.  Our understanding is that it makes it easy "
-"to obtain nonfree software, even beyond the proprietary firmware included "
-"with Fedora."
-msgstr ""
-"La distribution Red Hat Enterprise ne semble pas avoir de politique claire "
-"au sujet des logiciels qui peuvent être introduits. Notre interprétation 
est "
-"que cela rend très facile l'obtention de logiciels non-libres, bien au-delà 
"
-"des microcodes propriétaires inclus avec Fedora."
+"Red Hat's enterprise distribution primarily follows the same licensing "
+"policies as Fedora, with one exception.  Thus, we don't endorse it for <a "
+"href=\"#Fedora\">the same reasons</a>.  In addition to those, Red Hat has no "
+"policy against making nonfree software available for the system through "
+"supplementary distribution channels."
+msgstr ""
 
 # type: Content of: outside any tag (error?)
 msgid "<a id=\"Slackware\"></a>"
@@ -430,3 +427,15 @@
 # type: Content of: <div><h4>
 msgid "Translations of this page"
 msgstr "Traductions de cette page"
+
+# type: Content of: <p>
+#~ msgid ""
+#~ "Red Hat's enterprise distribution doesn't seem to have a clear policy "
+#~ "about what software can be included.  Our understanding is that it makes "
+#~ "it easy to obtain nonfree software, even beyond the proprietary firmware "
+#~ "included with Fedora."
+#~ msgstr ""
+#~ "La distribution Red Hat Enterprise ne semble pas avoir de politique "
+#~ "claire au sujet des logiciels qui peuvent être introduits. Notre "
+#~ "interprétation est que cela rend très facile l'obtention de logiciels 
non-"
+#~ "libres, bien au-delà des microcodes propriétaires inclus avec Fedora."

Index: common-distros.pot
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/distros/po/common-distros.pot,v
retrieving revision 1.4
retrieving revision 1.5
diff -u -b -r1.4 -r1.5
--- common-distros.pot  17 Jan 2010 21:25:05 -0000      1.4
+++ common-distros.pot  8 Feb 2010 21:25:41 -0000       1.5
@@ -7,7 +7,7 @@
 msgid ""
 msgstr ""
 "Project-Id-Version: PACKAGE VERSION\n"
-"POT-Creation-Date: 2010-01-17 16:25-0500\n"
+"POT-Creation-Date: 2010-02-08 16:25-0500\n"
 "PO-Revision-Date: YEAR-MO-DA HO:MI+ZONE\n"
 "Last-Translator: FULL NAME <address@hidden>\n"
 "Language-Team: LANGUAGE <address@hidden>\n"
@@ -194,10 +194,11 @@
 
 # type: Content of: <p>
 msgid ""
-"Red Hat's enterprise distribution doesn't seem to have a clear policy about "
-"what software can be included.  Our understanding is that it makes it easy "
-"to obtain nonfree software, even beyond the proprietary firmware included "
-"with Fedora."
+"Red Hat's enterprise distribution primarily follows the same licensing "
+"policies as Fedora, with one exception.  Thus, we don't endorse it for <a "
+"href=\"#Fedora\">the same reasons</a>.  In addition to those, Red Hat has no "
+"policy against making nonfree software available for the system through "
+"supplementary distribution channels."
 msgstr ""
 
 # type: Content of: outside any tag (error?)