www-commits
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

www/philosophy gates.html


From: Karl Berry
Subject: www/philosophy gates.html
Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2008 23:46:12 +0000

CVSROOT:        /web/www
Module name:    www
Changes by:     Karl Berry <karl>       08/07/11 23:46:12

Modified files:
        philosophy     : gates.html 

Log message:
        text updates per rms

CVSWeb URLs:
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/gates.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.4&r2=1.5

Patches:
Index: gates.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/gates.html,v
retrieving revision 1.4
retrieving revision 1.5
diff -u -b -r1.4 -r1.5
--- gates.html  10 Jul 2008 15:28:23 -0000      1.4
+++ gates.html  11 Jul 2008 23:46:06 -0000      1.5
@@ -9,23 +9,23 @@
 </p>
 
 <blockquote>
-<p><em>(This is an article published in BBC News in 2008.)</em></p>
+<p><em>(This article was <a
+href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/technology/7487060.stm";>published by
+BBC News in 2008</a>.)</em></p>
 </blockquote>
 
-  <p><strong>To pay so much attention to Bill Gates' retirement is
+  <p>To pay so much attention to Bill Gates' retirement is
   missing the point. What really matters is not Gates, nor
   Microsoft, but the unethical system of restrictions that
-  Microsoft, like many other software companies, imposes on its
-  customers.</strong></p>
+  Microsoft&mdash;like many other software companies&mdash;imposes on its
+  customers.</p>
 
-  <p>That statement may surprise you, since most people interested
-  in computers have strong feelings about Microsoft. Businessmen
-  and their tame politicians admire its success in building an
-  empire over so many computer users.</p>
-
-  <p>Many outside the computer field credit Microsoft for advances
-  which it only took advantage of, such as making computers cheap
-  and fast, and convenient graphical user interfaces.</p>
+  <p>That statement may surprise you, since most people interested in
+  computers have strong feelings about Microsoft. Businessmen and their
+  tame politicians admire its success in building an empire over so many
+  computer users.  Many outside the computer field credit Microsoft for
+  advances which it only took advantage of, such as making computers
+  cheap and fast, and convenient graphical user interfaces.</p>
 
   <p>Gates' philanthropy for health care for poor countries has won
   some people's good opinion. The LA Times reported that his
@@ -33,43 +33,32 @@
   the rest, sometimes in companies it suggests cause environmental
   degradation and illness in the same poor countries.</p>
 
-  <p>Many computerists specially hate Gates and Microsoft. They
-  have plenty of reasons.</p>
-
-  <p><strong>&lsquo;Solicit funds&rsquo;</strong></p>
-
-  <p>Microsoft persistently engages in anti-competitive behaviour,
-  and has been convicted three times. George W Bush, who let
-  Microsoft off the hook for the second US conviction, was invited
-  to Microsoft headquarters to solicit funds for the 2000
-  election.</p>
+  <p>Many computerists specially hate Gates and Microsoft. They have
+  plenty of reasons.  Microsoft persistently engages in anti-competitive
+  behaviour, and has been convicted three times. (Bush, who let
+  Microsoft off the hook for the second US conviction, was invited to
+  Microsoft headquarters to solicit funds for the 2000 election.  In the
+  UK, Microsoft established a major office in Gordon Brown's
+  constituency.  Both lawful, both potentially corrupting.)
 
   <p>Many users hate the &ldquo;Microsoft tax&rdquo;, the retail
   contracts that make you pay for Windows on your computer even if you
-  won't use it.</p>
-
-  <p>In some countries you can get a refund, but the effort
-  required is daunting.</p>
-
-  <p>There's also the Digital Restrictions Management: software
-  features designed to &ldquo;stop&rdquo; you from accessing your
-  files freely.  Increased restriction of users seems to be the main
-  advance of Vista.</p>
-
-  <p><strong>&lsquo;Gratuitous incompatibilities&rsquo;</strong></p>
-
-  <p>Then there are the gratuitous incompatibilities and obstacles
-  to interoperation with other software. This is why the EU
-  required Microsoft to publish interface specifications.</p>
-
-  <p>This year Microsoft packed standards committees with its
-  supporters to procure ISO approval of its unwieldy, unimplementable
-  and patented &ldquo;open standard&rdquo; for documents. The EU is
-  now investigating this.</p>
+  won't use it. (In some countries you can get a refund, but the effort
+  required is daunting.)  There's also the Digital Restrictions
+  Management: software features designed to &ldquo;stop&rdquo; you from
+  accessing your files freely.  (Increased restriction of users seems to
+  be the main advance of Vista.)</p>
+
+  <p>Then there are the gratuitous incompatibilities and obstacles to
+  interoperation with other software. (This is why the EU required
+  Microsoft to publish interface specifications.)  This year Microsoft
+  packed standards committees with its supporters to procure ISO
+  approval of its unwieldy, unimplementable and patented &ldquo;open
+  standard&rdquo; for documents. (The EU is now investigating this.)</p>
 
   <p>These actions are intolerable, of course, but they are not
   isolated events. They are systematic symptoms of a deeper wrong
-  which most people don't recognise: proprietary software.</p>
+  which most people don't recognize: proprietary software.</p>
 
   <p>Microsoft's software is distributed under licenses that keep
   users divided and helpless. The users are divided because they
@@ -77,51 +66,35 @@
   helpless because they don't have the source code that programmers
   can read and change.</p>
 
-  <p>If you're a programmer and you want to change the software,
-  for yourself or for someone else, you can't.</p>
-
-  <p>If you're a business and you want to pay a programmer to make
-  the software suit your needs better, you can't. If you copy it to
-  share with your friend, which is simple good-neighbourliness,
-  they call you a &ldquo;pirate&rdquo;.</p>
-
-  <p><strong>&lsquo;Unjust system&rsquo;</strong></p>
-
-  <p>Microsoft would have us believe that helping your neighbour is
-  the moral equivalent of attacking a ship.</p>
-
-  <p>The most important thing that Microsoft has done is to promote
-  this unjust social system.</p>
-
-  <p>Gates is personally identified with it, due to his infamous
-  open letter which rebuked microcomputer users for sharing copies
-  of his software.</p>
-
-  <p>It said, in effect, &ldquo;If you don't let me keep you divided
-  and helpless, I won't write the software and you won't have any.
-  Surrender to me, or you're lost!&rdquo;</p>
-
-  <p><strong>&lsquo;Change system&rsquo;</strong></p>
+  <p>If you're a programmer and you want to change the software, for
+  yourself or for someone else, you can't.  If you're a business and you
+  want to pay a programmer to make the software suit your needs better,
+  you can't. If you copy it to share with your friend, which is simple
+  good-neighbourliness, they call you a &ldquo;pirate&rdquo;.
+  Microsoft would have us believe that helping your neighbour is the
+  moral equivalent of attacking a ship.</p>
+
+  <p>The most important thing that Microsoft has done is to promote this
+  unjust social system.  Gates is personally identified with it, due to
+  his infamous open letter which rebuked microcomputer users for sharing
+  copies of his software. It said, in effect, &ldquo;If you don't let me
+  keep you divided and helpless, I won't write the software and you
+  won't have any.  Surrender to me, or you're lost!&rdquo;</p>
 
   <p>But Gates didn't invent proprietary software, and thousands of
-  other companies do the same thing. It's wrong, no matter who does
-  it.</p>
-
-  <p>Microsoft, Apple, Adobe, and the rest, offer you software that
-  gives them power over you. A change in executives or companies is
-  not important. What we need to change is this system.</p>
+  other companies do the same thing. It's wrong&mdash;no matter who does
+  it. Microsoft, Apple, Adobe, and the rest, offer you software that
+  gives them power over you. A change in executives or companies is not
+  important. What we need to change is this system.</p>
 
   <p>That's what the free software movement is all
   about. &ldquo;Free&rdquo; refers to freedom: we write and publish
-  software that users are free to share and modify.</p>
-
-  <p>We do this systematically, for freedom's sake; some of us
-  paid, many as volunteers. We already have complete free operating
-  systems, including GNU/Linux.</p>
-
-  <p>Our aim is to deliver a complete range of useful free
-  software, so that no computer user will be tempted to cede her
-  freedom to get software.</p>
+  software that users are free to share and modify.  We do this
+  systematically, for freedom's sake; some of us paid, many as
+  volunteers. We already have complete free operating systems, including
+  GNU/Linux. Our aim is to deliver a complete range of useful free
+  software, so that no computer user will be tempted to cede her freedom
+  to get software.</p>
 
   <p>In 1984, when I started the free software movement, I was hardly
   aware of Gates' letter. But I'd heard similar demands from others,
@@ -136,10 +109,9 @@
   schools. Tens of millions use it, around the world. You can use
   it too.</p>
 
-  <p>Gates may be gone, but the walls and bars of proprietary
-  software he helped create remain, for now.</p>
-
-  <p>Dismantling them is up to us.</p>
+  <p>Gates may be gone, but the walls and bars of proprietary software
+  he helped create remain&mdash;for now.  Dismantling them is up to
+  us.</p>
 
 </div>
 
@@ -192,7 +164,7 @@
 <p>
 Updated:
 <!-- timestamp start -->
-$Date: 2008/07/10 15:28:23 $
+$Date: 2008/07/11 23:46:06 $
 <!-- timestamp end -->
 </p>
 </div>




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]