www-commits
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

www/gnu fs-user-groups.html gnu-linux-faq.html


From: Yavor Doganov
Subject: www/gnu fs-user-groups.html gnu-linux-faq.html
Date: Sat, 14 Jun 2008 15:38:40 +0000

CVSROOT:        /web/www
Module name:    www
Changes by:     Yavor Doganov <yavor>   08/06/14 15:38:40

Modified files:
        gnu            : fs-user-groups.html gnu-linux-faq.html 

Log message:
        Validation and boilerplate compliance fixes.

CVSWeb URLs:
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/gnu/fs-user-groups.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.36&r2=1.37
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/gnu/gnu-linux-faq.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.87&r2=1.88

Patches:
Index: fs-user-groups.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/gnu/fs-user-groups.html,v
retrieving revision 1.36
retrieving revision 1.37
diff -u -b -r1.36 -r1.37
--- fs-user-groups.html 31 May 2008 12:19:41 -0000      1.36
+++ fs-user-groups.html 14 Jun 2008 15:38:25 -0000      1.37
@@ -65,7 +65,7 @@
          del Software Libre</a></li>
     </ul>
 
-  <h4 id="Chile">Colombia</h4>
+  <h4 id="Colombia">Colombia</h4>
     <ul>
       <li><a href="http://pulpa.utp.edu.co";>Pulpa - Grupo de Usuarios 
GNU/Linux de Pereira</a></li>
     </ul>
@@ -107,7 +107,7 @@
   <h4 id="Peru">Peru</h4>
     <ul>
       <li><a href="http://www.apesol.org/";>Asociaci&oacute;n Peruana de 
Software Libre</a></li>
-      <li><a href="http://www.somoslibres.org";>Grupo de Usuarios de Software 
Libre SomosLibres.org</a><li>
+      <li><a href="http://www.somoslibres.org";>Grupo de Usuarios de Software 
Libre SomosLibres.org</a></li>
     </ul>
 
   <h4 id="Spain">Spain</h4>
@@ -162,7 +162,7 @@
 <p>
 Updated:
 <!-- timestamp start -->
-$Date: 2008/05/31 12:19:41 $
+$Date: 2008/06/14 15:38:25 $
 <!-- timestamp end -->
 </p>
 </div>

Index: gnu-linux-faq.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/gnu/gnu-linux-faq.html,v
retrieving revision 1.87
retrieving revision 1.88
diff -u -b -r1.87 -r1.88
--- gnu-linux-faq.html  30 May 2008 21:33:47 -0000      1.87
+++ gnu-linux-faq.html  14 Jun 2008 15:38:25 -0000      1.88
@@ -26,10 +26,10 @@
 <li><a href="#whycare" id="TOCwhycare">Why is the name important?</a></li>
 
 <li><a href="#howerror" id="TOChowerror">How did it come about that most
-    people call the system "Linux"?</a></li>
+    people call the system &ldquo;Linux&rdquo;?</a></li>
 
-<li><a href="#always" id="TOCalways">Should we always say "GNU/Linux" instead
-of "Linux"?</a></li>
+<li><a href="#always" id="TOCalways">Should we always say
+&ldquo;GNU/Linux&rdquo; instead of &ldquo;Linux&rdquo;?</a></li>
 
 <li><a href="#linuxalone" id="TOClinuxalone">Would Linux have achieved
     the same success if there had been no GNU?</a></li>
@@ -41,15 +41,17 @@
     support an individual's free speech rights to call the system by
     any name that individual chooses?</a></li>
 
-<li><a href="#everyoneknows" id="TOCeveryoneknows">Since everyone knows
-    the role of GNU in developing the system, doesn't the "GNU/" in the
-    name go without saying?</a></li>
+<li><a href="#everyoneknows" id="TOCeveryoneknows">Since everyone
+    knows the role of GNU in developing the system, doesn't the
+    &ldquo;GNU/&rdquo; in the name go without saying?</a></li>
 
 <li><a href="#everyoneknows2" id="TOCeveryoneknows2">Since I know the role of
     GNU in this system, why does it matter what name I use?</a></li>
 
-<li><a href="#windows" id="TOCwindows">Isn't shortening "GNU/Linux"
-    to "Linux" just like shortening "Microsoft Windows" to "Windows"?</a></li>
+<li><a href="#windows" id="TOCwindows">Isn't shortening
+    &ldquo;GNU/Linux&rdquo; to &ldquo;Linux&rdquo; just like
+    shortening &ldquo;Microsoft Windows&rdquo; to
+    &ldquo;Windows&rdquo;?</a></li>
 
 <li><a href="#tools" id="TOCtools">Isn't GNU a collection of programming
     tools that were included in Linux?</a></li>
@@ -65,17 +67,19 @@
     system after the kernel, Linux.  Isn't it normal to name an
     operating system after a kernel?</a></li>
 
-<li><a href="#long" id="TOClong">The problem with "GNU/Linux" is that it
-    is too long.  How about recommending a shorter name?</a></li>
+<li><a href="#long" id="TOClong">The problem with
+    &ldquo;GNU/Linux&rdquo; is that it is too long.  How about
+    recommending a shorter name?</a></li>
 
 <li><a href="#justgnu" id="TOCjustgnu">Since Linux is a secondary
     contribution, would it be false to the facts to call the system
     simply "GNU"?</a></li>
 
-<li><a href="#trademarkfee" id="TOCtrademarkfee">I would have
-    to pay a fee if I use "Linux" in the name of a product, and that
-    would also apply if I say "GNU/Linux".  Is it wrong if I use "GNU"
-    without "Linux", to save the fee?</a></li>
+<li><a href="#trademarkfee" id="TOCtrademarkfee">I would have to pay a
+    fee if I use &ldquo;Linux&rdquo; in the name of a product, and
+    that would also apply if I say &ldquo;GNU/Linux&rdquo;.  Is it
+    wrong if I use &ldquo;GNU&rdquo; without &ldquo;Linux&rdquo;, to
+    save the fee?</a></li>
 
 <li><a href="#many" id="TOCmany">Many other projects contributed to the
     system as it is today; it includes TeX, X11, Apache, Perl, and many
@@ -94,34 +98,37 @@
     contributed to the system as it is today; doesn't that mean
     we ought to call it GNU/Redhat/Novell/Linux?</a></li>
 
-<li><a href="#whyslash" id="TOCwhyslash">Why do you write "GNU/Linux"
-    instead of "GNU Linux"?</a></li>
+<li><a href="#whyslash" id="TOCwhyslash">Why do you write
+    &ldquo;GNU/Linux&rdquo; instead of &ldquo;GNU
+    Linux&rdquo;?</a></li>
 
-<li><a href="#whyorder" id="TOCwhyorder">Why "GNU/Linux" rather than
-"Linux/GNU"?</a></li>
+<li><a href="#whyorder" id="TOCwhyorder">Why &ldquo;GNU/Linux&rdquo;
+rather than &ldquo;Linux/GNU&rdquo;?</a></li>
 
 <li><a href="#distronames" id="TOCdistronames">My distro is called
-    "Foobar Linux"; doesn't that show it's really Linux?</a></li>
+    &ldquo;Foobar Linux&rdquo;; doesn't that show it's really
+    Linux?</a></li>
 
-<li><a href="#distronames1" id="TOCdistronames1">My distro's
-    official name is "Foobar Linux"; isn't it wrong to call the distro
-    anything but "Linux"?</a></li>
+<li><a href="#distronames1" id="TOCdistronames1">My distro's official
+    name is &ldquo;Foobar Linux&rdquo;; isn't it wrong to call the
+    distro anything but &ldquo;Linux&rdquo;?</a></li>
 
 <li><a href="#companies" id="TOCcompanies">Wouldn't it be more
     effective to ask companies such as Mandrake, Red Hat and IBM to
-    call their distributions "GNU/Linux" rather than asking
-    individuals?</a></li>
+    call their distributions &ldquo;GNU/Linux&rdquo; rather than
+    asking individuals?</a></li>
 
-<li><a href="#reserve" id="TOCreserve">Wouldn't it be better to reserve
-    the name "GNU/Linux" for distributions that are purely free
-    software?  After all, that is the ideal of GNU.</a></li>
+<li><a href="#reserve" id="TOCreserve">Wouldn't it be better to
+    reserve the name &ldquo;GNU/Linux&rdquo; for distributions that
+    are purely free software?  After all, that is the ideal of
+    GNU.</a></li>
 
 <li><a href="#gnudist" id="TOCgnudist">Why not make a GNU distribution of
     Linux (sic) and call that GNU/Linux?</a></li>
 
-<li><a href="#linuxgnu" id="TOClinuxgnu">Why not just say "Linux is
-    the GNU kernel" and release some existing version of GNU/Linux
-    under the name "GNU"?</a></li>
+<li><a href="#linuxgnu" id="TOClinuxgnu">Why not just say &ldquo;Linux
+    is the GNU kernel&rdquo; and release some existing version of
+    GNU/Linux under the name &ldquo;GNU&rdquo;?</a></li>
 
 <li><a href="#condemn" id="TOCcondemn">Did the GNU Project condemn and
     oppose use of Linux in the early days?</a></li>
@@ -133,9 +140,11 @@
     be applied to all programs that are GPL'ed?</a></li>
     
 <li><a href="#unix" id="TOCunix">Since much of GNU comes from Unix,
-    shouldn't GNU give credit to Unix by using "Unix" in its name?</a></li>
+    shouldn't GNU give credit to Unix by using &ldquo;Unix&rdquo; in
+    its name?</a></li>
 
-<li><a href="#bsd" id="TOCbsd">Should we say "GNU/BSD" too?</a></li>
+<li><a href="#bsd" id="TOCbsd">Should we say &ldquo;GNU/BSD&rdquo;
+too?</a></li>
 
 <li><a href="#othersys" id="TOCothersys">If I install the GNU tools on
     Windows, does that mean I am running a GNU/Windows system?</a></li>
@@ -144,8 +153,8 @@
     without GNU?</a></li>
 
 <li><a href="#helplinus" id="TOChelplinus">Why not call the system
-    "Linux" anyway, and strengthen Linus Torvalds' role as posterboy for our
-    community?</a></li>
+    &ldquo;Linux&rdquo; anyway, and strengthen Linus Torvalds' role as
+    posterboy for our community?</a></li>
 
 <li><a href="#claimlinux" id="TOCclaimlinux">Isn't it wrong for us to label 
Linus
     Torvalds' work as GNU?</a></li>
@@ -153,17 +162,17 @@
 <li><a href="#linusagreed" id="TOClinusagreed">Does Linus Torvalds
     agree that Linux is just the kernel?</a></li>
     
-<li><a href="#lost" id="TOClost">The battle is already lost--society has
-    made its decision and we can't change it, so why even think about
-    it?</a></li>
+<li><a href="#lost" id="TOClost">The battle is already
+    lost&mdash;society has made its decision and we can't change it,
+    so why even think about it?</a></li>
     
 <li><a href="#whatgood" id="TOCwhatgood">Society has made its decision
     and we can't change it, so what good does it do if I say
-    "GNU/Linux"?</a></li>
+    &ldquo;GNU/Linux&rdquo;?</a></li>
     
-<li><a href="#explain" id="TOCexplain">Wouldn't it be better to call the
-    system "Linux" and teach people its real origin with a ten-minute
-    explanation?</a></li>
+<li><a href="#explain" id="TOCexplain">Wouldn't it be better to call
+    the system &ldquo;Linux&rdquo; and teach people its real origin
+    with a ten-minute explanation?</a></li>
     
 <li><a href="#treatment" id="TOCtreatment">Some people laugh at you when
     you ask them to call the system GNU/Linux.  Why do you subject yourself
@@ -180,18 +189,20 @@
     BSD license's advertising requirement to give credit to the University of 
     California, isn't it hypocritical to demand credit for the GNU 
project?</a></li>
 
-<li><a href="#require" id="TOCrequire">Shouldn't you put something in the GNU 
GPL to
-    require people to call the system "GNU"?</a></li>
-
-<li><a href="#deserve" id="TOCdeserve">Since you failed to put something in 
the GNU GPL
-    to require people to call the system "GNU", you deserve what
-    happened; why are you complaining now?</a></li>
+<li><a href="#require" id="TOCrequire">Shouldn't you put something in
+    the GNU GPL to require people to call the system
+    &ldquo;GNU&rdquo;?</a></li>
+
+<li><a href="#deserve" id="TOCdeserve">Since you failed to put
+    something in the GNU GPL to require people to call the system
+    &ldquo;GNU&rdquo;, you deserve what happened; why are you
+    complaining now?</a></li>
 
 <li><a href="#contradict" id="TOCcontradict">Wouldn't you be better off
     not contradicting what so many people believe?</a></li>
 
 <li><a href="#somanyright" id="TOCsomanyright">Since many people call it
-    "Linux", doesn't that make it right?</a></li>
+    &ldquo;Linux&rdquo;, doesn't that make it right?</a></li>
 
 <li><a href="#winning" id="TOCwinning">Many people care about what's 
convenient or
     who's winning, not about arguments of right or wrong.  Couldn't you
@@ -720,10 +731,11 @@
 It isn't a choice of one or the other&mdash;we ask companies and
 organizations and individuals to help spread the word.  In fact, we
 have asked all three of those companies.  Mandrake uses the term
-&ldquo;GNU/Linux&rdquo; some of the time, but IBM and Red Hat were unwilling to
-help.  One executive said, &ldquo;This is a pure commercial decision; we
-expect to make more money calling it `Linux'.&rdquo;  In other words, that
-company did not care what was right.
+&ldquo;GNU/Linux&rdquo; some of the time, but IBM and Red Hat were
+unwilling to help.  One executive said, &ldquo;This is a pure
+commercial decision; we expect to make more money calling it
+&lsquo;Linux&rsquo;.&rdquo; In other words, that company did not care
+what was right.
 <p>
 We can't make them change, but we're not the sort to give up just
 because the road isn't easy.  You may not have as much influence at
@@ -1287,7 +1299,7 @@
 There are also <a href="/contact/">other ways to contact</a> 
 the FSF.
 <br />
-Please send broken links and other corrections (or suggestions) to
+Please send broken links and other corrections or suggestions to
 <a href="mailto:address@hidden";><em>address@hidden</em></a>.
 </p>
 
@@ -1299,7 +1311,7 @@
 </p>
 
 <p>
-Copyright &copy; 2001, 2006, 2007 Free Software Foundation, Inc.,
+Copyright &copy; 2001, 2006, 2007, 2008 Free Software Foundation, Inc.,
 </p>
 <address>51 Franklin St, Fifth Floor, Boston, MA 02110-1301, USA</address>
 <p>Verbatim copying and distribution of this entire article is
@@ -1310,7 +1322,7 @@
 <p>
 Updated:
 <!-- timestamp start -->
-$Date: 2008/05/30 21:33:47 $
+$Date: 2008/06/14 15:38:25 $
 <!-- timestamp end -->
 </p>
 </div>




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]