www-commits
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

www/gnu gnu-linux-faq.html


From: Joakim Olsson
Subject: www/gnu gnu-linux-faq.html
Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2008 10:28:27 +0000

CVSROOT:        /web/www
Module name:    www
Changes by:     Joakim Olsson <jocke>   08/04/30 10:28:27

Modified files:
        gnu            : gnu-linux-faq.html 

Log message:
        Fixed a little more.

CVSWeb URLs:
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/gnu/gnu-linux-faq.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.82&r2=1.83

Patches:
Index: gnu-linux-faq.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/gnu/gnu-linux-faq.html,v
retrieving revision 1.82
retrieving revision 1.83
diff -u -b -r1.82 -r1.83
--- gnu-linux-faq.html  30 Apr 2008 10:22:43 -0000      1.82
+++ gnu-linux-faq.html  30 Apr 2008 10:28:12 -0000      1.83
@@ -87,16 +87,9 @@
     the system as it is today, but they don't insist on calling it
     XYZ/Linux.  Why should we treat GNU specially?</a></li>
 
-<li><a href="#allsmall" id="allsmall">GNU is a small fraction of the system
+<li><a href="#allsmall" id="TOCallsmall">GNU is a small fraction of the system
     nowadays, so why should we mention it?</a></li>
 
-<li><a href="#distronames" id="distronames">My distro is called
-    &ldquo;Foobar Linux&rdquo;; doesn't that show it's really Linux?</a></li>
-
-<li><a href="#distronames1" id="distronames1">My distro's official name is
-    &ldquo;Foobar Linux&rdquo;; isn't it wrong to call the distro 
-    anything but &ldquo;Linux&rdquo;?</a></li>
-
 <li><a href="#manycompanies" id="TOCmanycompanies">Many companies
     contributed to the system as it is today; doesn't that mean
     we ought to call it GNU/Redhat/Novell/Linux?</a></li>
@@ -154,7 +147,7 @@
     "Linux" anyway, and strengthen Linus Torvalds' role as posterboy for our
     community?</a></li>
 
-<li><a href="#claimlinux" id="claimlinux">Isn't it wrong for us to label Linus
+<li><a href="#claimlinux" id="TOCclaimlinux">Isn't it wrong for us to label 
Linus
     Torvalds' work as GNU?</a></li>
 
 <li><a href="#linusagreed" id="TOClinusagreed">Does Linus Torvalds
@@ -190,10 +183,6 @@
 <li><a href="#require" id="TOCrequire">Shouldn't you put something in the GNU 
GPL to
     require people to call the system "GNU"?</a></li>
 
-<li><a href="#winning" id="TOCwinning">Many people care about what's 
convenient or
-    who's winning, not about arguments of right or wrong.  Couldn't you
-    get more of their support by a different road?</a></li>
-
 <li><a href="#deserve" id="TOCdeserve">Since you failed to put something in 
the GNU GPL
     to require people to call the system "GNU", you deserve what
     happened; why are you complaining now?</a></li>
@@ -1317,7 +1306,7 @@
 <p>
 Updated:
 <!-- timestamp start -->
-$Date: 2008/04/30 10:22:43 $
+$Date: 2008/04/30 10:28:12 $
 <!-- timestamp end -->
 </p>
 </div>




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]