www/gnu thegnuproject.html

[Richard M. Stallman]

CVSROOT:        /webcvs/www
Module name:    www
Changes by:     Richard M. Stallman <rms>       07/12/25 17:05:20

Modified files:
        gnu            : thegnuproject.html 

Log message:
        Use <em> instead of *.  Add link on "piracy".

CVSWeb URLs:
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/gnu/thegnuproject.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.36&r2=1.37

Patches:
Index: thegnuproject.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /webcvs/www/www/gnu/thegnuproject.html,v
retrieving revision 1.36
retrieving revision 1.37
diff -u -b -r1.36 -r1.37
--- thegnuproject.html  19 Jun 2007 00:03:59 -0000      1.36
+++ thegnuproject.html  25 Dec 2007 17:05:15 -0000      1.37
@@ -92,8 +92,8 @@
 people that there is only one way to look at the issue.</p>
 <p>
 When software publishers talk about &ldquo;enforcing&rdquo; their
-&ldquo;rights&rdquo; or &ldquo;stopping piracy&rdquo;, what they
-actually *say* is secondary.  The real message of these statements is
+&ldquo;rights&rdquo; or &ldquo;stopping <a 
href="/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html#Piracy">piracy</a>&rdquo;, what they
+actually <em>say</em> is secondary.  The real message of these statements is
 in the unstated assumptions they take for granted; the public is
 supposed to accept them uncritically.  So let's examine them.</p>
 <p>
@@ -878,7 +878,7 @@
 fit the modified program.  In other words, they don't block the free
 software community from making full use of the manual.</p>
 <p>
-However, it must be possible to modify all the *technical* content of
+However, it must be possible to modify all the <em>technical</em> content of
 the manual, and then distribute the result in all the usual media,
 through all the usual channels; otherwise, the restrictions do
 obstruct the community, the manual is not free, and we need another
@@ -1011,7 +1011,7 @@
 <p>
 Updated:
 <!-- timestamp start -->
-$Date: 2007/06/19 00:03:59 $
+$Date: 2007/12/25 17:05:15 $
 <!-- timestamp end -->
 </p>
 </div>