[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
www/licenses gpl-faq.html
From: |
Brett Smith |
Subject: |
www/licenses gpl-faq.html |
Date: |
Fri, 30 Nov 2007 15:28:55 +0000 |
CVSROOT: /web/www
Module name: www
Changes by: Brett Smith <brett> 07/11/30 15:28:55
Modified files:
licenses : gpl-faq.html
Log message:
New question per RMS, vetted by Fontana.
CVSWeb URLs:
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/licenses/gpl-faq.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.117&r2=1.118
Patches:
Index: gpl-faq.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/licenses/gpl-faq.html,v
retrieving revision 1.117
retrieving revision 1.118
diff -u -b -r1.117 -r1.118
--- gpl-faq.html 26 Nov 2007 16:28:17 -0000 1.117
+++ gpl-faq.html 30 Nov 2007 15:28:51 -0000 1.118
@@ -205,6 +205,10 @@
“ interacting with [the software] remotely through a computer
network?”</a></li>
+ <li><a href="#ApacheLegalEntity">How does GPLv3's concept of
+ “you” compare to the definition of “Legal
+ Entity” in the Apache License 2.0?</a></li>
+
</ul>
<h4>Using GNU licenses for your programs</h4>
@@ -3023,6 +3027,17 @@
or a remote X session.
</p></dd>
+<dt><b><a name="ApacheLegalEntity">How does GPLv3's concept of
+“you” compare to the definition of “Legal Entity”
+in the Apache License 2.0?</a></b></dt>
+
+<dd><p>They're effectively identical. The definition of “Legal
+Entity” in the Apache License 2.0 is very standard in various kinds
+of legal agreements—so much so that it would be very surprising if a
+court did not interpret the term in the same way in the absence of an
+explicit definition. We fully expect them to do the same when they look at
+GPLv3 and consider who qualifies as a licensee.</p></dd>
+
<dt><b><a name="AllCompatibility">How are the various GNU licenses
compatible with each other?</a></b></dt>
@@ -3269,7 +3284,7 @@
<p>
Updated:
<!-- timestamp start -->
- $Date: 2007/11/26 16:28:17 $
+ $Date: 2007/11/30 15:28:51 $
<!-- timestamp end -->
</p>
</div>