www/philosophy ipjustice.html

[Yavor Doganov]

CVSROOT:        /web/www
Module name:    www
Changes by:     Yavor Doganov <yavor>   07/04/24 06:59:49

Modified files:
        philosophy     : ipjustice.html 

Log message:
        Include the minimal footer.

CVSWeb URLs:
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/ipjustice.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.10&r2=1.11

Patches:
Index: ipjustice.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/ipjustice.html,v
retrieving revision 1.10
retrieving revision 1.11
diff -u -b -r1.10 -r1.11
--- ipjustice.html      23 Apr 2007 16:49:49 -0000      1.10
+++ ipjustice.html      24 Apr 2007 06:59:32 -0000      1.11
@@ -7,25 +7,37 @@
 <h2>Reject IP Enforcement Directive</h2>
 
 <p>
-A coalition of civil liberties and consumer groups opposes a new proposed 
directive for stricter punishment for copyright and patent infringement:
+A coalition of civil liberties and consumer groups opposes a new
+proposed directive for stricter punishment for copyright and patent
+infringement:
 </p>
 
 <p>
 <a 
href="http://www.ipjustice.org/081103codepress.shtml";>http://www.ipjustice.org/081103codepress.shtml</a></p>
 
 <p>
-The FSF also opposes this directive, but we did not sign that statement 
because it accepts too much of what ought to be opposed.  EU law is already too 
restrictive, and simply to prevent further changes is not enough.  It is wrong 
to stop people from sharing music and other published works, and only draconian 
laws could possibly do the job, so it's no surprise to see they are being 
proposed.  But opposing this directive without criticizing its unjust 
motivation is insufficient.  Even using the term "intellectual property" is a 
point of weakness, because this is a <a 
href="/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html#IntellectualProperty"> propaganda 
term</a> for those who aim to restrict the public.
+The FSF also opposes this directive, but we did not sign that
+statement because it accepts too much of what ought to be opposed.  EU
+law is already too restrictive, and simply to prevent further changes
+is not enough.  It is wrong to stop people from sharing music and
+other published works, and only draconian laws could possibly do the
+job, so it's no surprise to see they are being proposed.  But opposing
+this directive without criticizing its unjust motivation is
+insufficient.  Even using the term &ldquo;intellectual property&rdquo;
+is a point of weakness, because this is
+a <a href="/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html#IntellectualProperty">
+propaganda term</a> for those who aim to restrict the public.
 </p>
 
 </div>
 
-<!--#include virtual="/server/footer-short.html" -->
+<!--#include virtual="/server/footer-min.html" -->
 
 <div id="footer">
 <p>
 Please send FSF &amp; GNU inquiries to 
 <a href="mailto:address@hidden";><em>address@hidden</em></a>.
-There are also <a href="http://www.fsf.org/about/contact.html";>other ways to 
contact</a> 
+There are also <a href="/contact/">other ways to contact</a> 
 the FSF.
 <br />
 Please send broken links and other corrections (or suggestions) to
@@ -40,17 +52,17 @@
 </p>
 
 <p>
-Copyright &copy; 2003 Free Software Foundation, Inc., 59 Temple
-Place - Fifth Floor, Bostan MA 02110, USA
-<br />
-Verbatim copying and distribution of this entire article is permitted in any 
-medium, provided this notice is preserved.
+Copyright &copy; 2003 Free Software Foundation, Inc.,
+</p>
+<address>59 Temple Place - Fifth Floor, Bostan MA 02110, USA</address>
+<p>Verbatim copying and distribution of this entire article is
+permitted in any medium, provided this notice is preserved.
 </p>
 
 <p>
 Updated:
 <!-- timestamp start -->
-$Date: 2007/04/23 16:49:49 $
+$Date: 2007/04/24 06:59:32 $
 <!-- timestamp end -->
 </p>
 </div>