[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Wget-dev] scripts under /benchmarks
From: |
G_Gold |
Subject: |
Re: [Wget-dev] scripts under /benchmarks |
Date: |
Wed, 1 Aug 2018 22:03:23 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.9.4 (2018-02-28) |
Darshit,
I was referring to the 'wget2_noinstall' directory, I'm not able
to locate it, in either wget or wget2 build directories.
I'm sorry if I'm missing something very obvious :-)
Guy
On Wed,Aug 01 02:44:PM, Darshit Shah wrote:
> * G_Gold <address@hidden> [180801 09:39]:
> > Thank you Tim, Darshit.
> >
> > In benchmark.sh , the line:
> >
> > WGET2="$SCRIPT_DIR/../src/wget2_noinstall
> >
> > might be referring to a directory that has been removed ever since ?
> >
> Nope. That directory definitely exists.
> $SCRIPT_DIR is the directory where the script lies (./benchmarks/), so the
> path
> you're seeing there is just the path to the wget2 binary.
> >
> > Thank you.
> >
> >
> >
> > On Tue,Jul 31 04:45:PM, Darshit Shah wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > These scripts were written last year in order to benchmark the network
> > > performance of Wget2 relative to the other major tools, Wget and cURL.
> > >
> > > They're meant to be one shot with no arguments passed.
> > >
> > > Since only a couple of us devs have ever used these scripts, they have
> > > some
> > > implicit assumptions. Tim already clarified how the paths are to be
> > > interpreted.
> > >
> > > These scripts could definitely be cleaned up / expanded and any effort in
> > > that
> > > direction will be very appreciated! In case you're interested in doing
> > > so, I
> > > would recommend you start by cleaning up the scripts as best as you can
> > > (Shellcheck is an amazing tool for this).
> > >
> > > Some ideas I have for expanding these scripts:
> > >
> > > 1. Allow passing --benchmark-path as an argument which points to a
> > > directory
> > > containing all containing all the sources (Wget, cURL, etc.)
> > > 2. Expand the scripts to cover some other popular tools (Aria2, axel,
> > > etc.)
> > > 3. As Tim mentioned, testing a recursive download (over HTTP/1.1 and
> > > HTTP/2)
> > >
> > > Any other ideas that you may have for performance metrics when comparing
> > > such
> > > tools would also be welcome.
> > >
> > > * G_Gold <address@hidden> [180731 10:38]:
> > > > Greetings list.
> > > >
> > > > I'd like to help and expand the scripts under /benchmarks, can
> > > > any of the members please help shed a bit more light on usage, or
> > > > any information that can help ?
> > > >
> > > > When I call the script without arguments (should I be calling it with
> > > > arguments? I'm not certain), it exits with:
> > > >
> > > > address@hidden:~/wget2/benchmarks$ ./benchmark.sh
> > > > benchmark.sh: line 34: /home/guy/wget2/benchmarks/../../wget/src/wget:
> > > > No such file or directory
> > > >
> > > > it seems the relative paths are inaccurate (?)
> > > >
> > > > Thank you.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Guy Gold
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Thanking You,
> > > Darshit Shah
> > > PGP Fingerprint: 7845 120B 07CB D8D6 ECE5 FF2B 2A17 43ED A91A 35B6
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Guy Gold
> >
> >
>
> --
> Thanking You,
> Darshit Shah
> PGP Fingerprint: 7845 120B 07CB D8D6 ECE5 FF2B 2A17 43ED A91A 35B6
--
Guy Gold
- Re: [Wget-dev] scripts under /benchmarks, Darshit Shah, 2018/08/01
- Re: [Wget-dev] scripts under /benchmarks,
G_Gold <=
- Re: [Wget-dev] scripts under /benchmarks, Darshit Shah, 2018/08/02
- Re: [Wget-dev] scripts under /benchmarks, G_Gold, 2018/08/04
- Re: [Wget-dev] scripts under /benchmarks, Tim Rühsen, 2018/08/04
- Re: [Wget-dev] scripts under /benchmarks, G_Gold, 2018/08/04
- Re: [Wget-dev] scripts under /benchmarks, Tim Rühsen, 2018/08/05
- Re: [Wget-dev] scripts under /benchmarks, G_Gold, 2018/08/05
- Re: [Wget-dev] scripts under /benchmarks, Tim Rühsen, 2018/08/07