[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Vrs-development] IBM Token Ring Thingy...

From: morphius
Subject: Re: [Vrs-development] IBM Token Ring Thingy...
Date: Wed, 08 May 2002 12:03:08 -0700 (PDT)

You wrote:

Chris is right. I think the GNU/FSF guys will be able to help us out in this.
Every database company has presence in this group and it is quite understandable
that they charge for this stuff, i suppose. They evidently have a dictionary
that has a different meaning for "Open" :-)

- Morphius

> On Wednesday 08 May 2002 16:56, you wrote:
> > Humm .. quite a stretch of the term "Open" at those
> > memberships fee prices.  It there any kind of
> > encumberance on these specs that might screw us up?
> They're specs for 'open compatibility'.
> Implementing systems that conform to these won't cause any problems.
> At least I don't think so.
> Perhaps we could bounce this question over to the GNU guys who know.
> I hope not - the XA/XATMI stuff is really important as it'll allow Goldwater
> to integrate with products such as Oracle.
> C
> --
> Chris Smith
>   Technical Architect - netFluid Technology Limited.
>   "Internet Technologies, Distributed Systems and Tuxedo Consultancy"
>   E: address@hidden  W: http://www.nfluid.co.uk
> _______________________________________________
> Vrs-development mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://mail.freesoftware.fsf.org/mailman/listinfo/vrs-development

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]