[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Vrs-development] IBM Token Ring Thingy...

From: Bill Lance
Subject: Re: [Vrs-development] IBM Token Ring Thingy...
Date: Fri, 3 May 2002 17:06:49 -0700 (PDT)

--- Eric Altendorf <address@hidden> wrote:
> On Friday 03 May 2002 16:45, Bill Lance wrote:
> > --- address@hidden wrote:
> > > I agree with the looseness of LDS within a
> cluster
> > > but a 2 phase commit will
> > > provide better reliability and rollback support.
> >
> > How can we do it without locking up processes?
> The only processes which would have to be locked are
> those which are 
> attempted to read from or write to the block being
> modified.  I think.

Humm ..  If these were part of the backgorund cluster
management activities, it probably wouldn't make a
difference.   As long as actual services requests
wern't hold up.  And these should be operating from
the cache anyway.

Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Health - your guide to health and wellness

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]