[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Vrs-development] IBM Token Ring Thingy...

From: Eric Altendorf
Subject: Re: [Vrs-development] IBM Token Ring Thingy...
Date: Fri, 3 May 2002 17:00:20 -0700

On Friday 03 May 2002 16:45, Bill Lance wrote:
> --- address@hidden wrote:
> > I agree with the looseness of LDS within a cluster
> > but a 2 phase commit will
> > provide better reliability and rollback support.
> How can we do it without locking up processes?

The only processes which would have to be locked are those which are 
attempted to read from or write to the block being modified.  I think.


"First they ignore you.  Then they laugh at you.
 Then they fight you.  And then you win."             -Gandhi

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]