vile
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [vile] How can I run xvile like "gvim -f"?


From: Thomas Dickey
Subject: Re: [vile] How can I run xvile like "gvim -f"?
Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2017 16:51:19 -0500
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)

On Mon, Dec 11, 2017 at 08:32:13PM +0000, Chris Green wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 11, 2017 at 01:47:54PM -0500, Paul Fox wrote:
> > address@hidden wrote:
> >  > Chris Green writes:
> >  > >On Mon, Dec 11, 2017 at 01:06:47PM +0000, Chris Green wrote:
> >  > >> I am invoking xvile from a firefox extension (textern if anyone is
> >  > >> interested, it's a replacement for "It's all text" which doesn't work
> >  > >> on Firefox 57 or newer).
> >  > >> 
> >  > >> For this to work xvile needs to stay in the foreground when invoked,
> >  > >> i.e. it needs to to what gvim does with "gvim -f".  Is there any way
> >  > >> to get it to do this or will I need some sort of wrapper?
> >  > >> 
> >  > >To be more explicit I need xvile to not detach from the calling
> >  > >process.  This is so that the caller blocks until xvile exits.
> >  > 
> >  > I guess I don't understand what you're asking.  When I run xvile,
> >  > the program stays in the foreground and the shell waits for the
> >  > program to end.  If that's what you're asking for, then as far as I
> >  > can tell, the answer is "It does that by default."
> > 
> > i just said the same thing privately to chris -- forgot to cc: the list.
> > 
> ... and here's my reply (copied back to the list):-
> 
> > i guess i'm a little confused, now that i've actually fired up xvile.
> >
> > if i start xvile from a shell, the shell waits for it to exit.  if i
> > start xvile with "xvile -fork", then it doesn't wait -- i.e., i get a
> > fresh prompt.
> >
> You're right!  So what does +fork do?  ... or is it just the default
> behaviour?

+fork tells xvile to NOT fork and set a new process group.
 
> Whatever it doesn't do the same as 'gvim -f'.
> 
> > do you perhaps have an X resources file that's changing xvile's behavior?
> >
> No, as above I think mine works the same as yours.  The question is
> how do I make it do what 'gvim -f' does (and what is that?).

"xvile +fork" should work.  But since it's not, I'd suggest finding why
xvile exits early.  For that, I'd use strace (if you're running on a
Linux system - seems that strace's "maintainer" removed other platforms
a while back).  By making the extension call a shell script which logs
the system calls to xvile, you can spot where the program gives up:

        #!/bin/sh
        strace -s 1024 -o trace.log xvile +fork "$@"

Perhaps the extension sends xvile a SIGHUP or something like that, and
gvim ignores it.

-- 
Thomas E. Dickey <address@hidden>
https://invisible-island.net
ftp://ftp.invisible-island.net

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]